XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
XPost: soc.culture.greek, soc.culture.israel

Professeur de merde, Mikhail Blumboig wrote:

On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 07:39:40 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/oct/13/boris-johnson-covid-laws-rights-decree-two-years-democracy

Boris Johnson’s Covid laws took away our rights with flick of a pen. >>>> Don’t let that happen again
Adam Wagner
Ministers were able to rule by decree for more than two years. That’s >>>> not true democracy and it remains a risk in the future

Boris Johnson addressing the nation from 10 Downing Street as he placed >>>> the UK on lockdown.
Boris Johnson addressing the nation from 10 Downing Street as he placed >>>> the UK under lockdown in March 2020. Photograph: PA
Thu 13 Oct 2022 05.07 EDT
730
It is almost three years since the first case of a novel coronavirus was >>>> identified in Wuhan, China.

It’s just over two and a half years since Boris Johnson gave us a “very
simple instruction”, that we “must stay at home”, followed – three days
later – by a law that for the first time in our history would impose a >>>> 24-hour curfew on almost the entire population. The years, months, weeks >>>> and days since have been so relentless – and at times almost beyond
belief – that it is difficult to begin to process them. Many of us have >>>> experienced personal bereavement, and everyone has been touched in some way.

But as tempting as it is to move on, to focus on other important issues >>>> vexing our society, there are some aspects of the past three years we
must face up to.

Advertisement

There are a hundred lenses through which to view this important period >>>> in modern history, but as a barrister I have looked at the more than 100 >>>> laws that placed England in lockdown, imposed hotel quarantine,
international travel restrictions, self-isolation, face coverings and
business closures.

These were probably the strangest and most extraordinary laws in
England’s history, imposing previously unimaginable restrictions on our >>>> social lives, bringing into the realm of the criminal law areas of life >>>> – where we could worship, when we could leave home, even who we could >>>> hug – that had previously been purely a matter of personal choice.

By early 2020, the Johnson government already had form for seeing
democracy as a gadfly to be swatted away, having tried, and failed – >>>> thanks to the supreme court – to shut down parliament for weeks to ram >>>> through a Brexit deal. When the pandemic hit, it is no surprise that it >>>> took the same approach to involving parliament in the most consequential >>>> decisions and laws in living memory.

The Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 allowed for ministers to >>>> enact the coronavirus regulations with almost no parliamentary scrutiny. >>>> Of 109 lockdown laws, only eight were considered by parliament before
coming into force, usually only a day before. The rest became law
(literally) as soon as Matt Hancock, the then health secretary, put his >>>> signature at the bottom of the page.

Finally, this reckless government faces a reckoning for Covid deaths in >>>> care homes
Charlie Williams
Read more
I am not suggesting that emergency law-making would ever be
straightforward and neat, following all the processes of ordinary
legislation. During public emergencies, events move swiftly and
mercilessly. But it did not have to be like this.

Advertisement
Also troubling was the constant refrain that the government was
“following the science”, by which it meant its scientific advisory >>>> group, Sage. But decisions were ultimately taken in the extremely
powerful but opaque Covid-19 cabinet committees, presided over by four >>>> ministers – Boris Johnson, Rishi Sunak, Matt Hancock and Michael Gove. >>>> No minutes were released and no explanation offered of how decisions
were made. This was the most powerful government committee since the
second world war, but received no scrutiny. Important political
decisions need to be understood, scrutinised and tested. These hardly were.

We still live in the state that permitted ministers to rule by decree
for more than two years, and where basic freedoms were removed without >>>> democratic scrutiny or accountability. In 2008, the Public Health and
Wellbeing Act was amended to include vast powers for ministers to use in >>>> the case of a public health emergency. And because ministers would have >>>> the power to impose laws without parliament having to review them for
four weeks (or sometimes longer), they could, as one prescient member of >>>> the House of Lords put it during the brief 2008 debate, “at the stroke >>>> of a pen … limit and constrain the daily lives and freedoms of citizens”.

Parliament, meanwhile, allowed itself to play the role of a 1,400-person >>>> rubber stamp. The police, tasked with enforcing the ever-growing mass of >>>> legislation, often being changed more than once a week, floundered
between excessive and unjustified intrusions into our private lives, or >>>> – as was initially the case with the Partygate investigation –
attempting to stay out of the fray altogether. The courts, for their
part, also played a limited role, ruling repeatedly that pandemic policy >>>> – even when it interfered with fundamental rights – was a matter for >>>> government and parliament, not judges.

Why does this matter now? Because the pandemic – and the ease with which >>>> ancient freedoms such as the right to protest, to worship, to see our
families, were removed essentially by decisions of a tiny group of
ministers – should be a wake-up call. It is only a matter of time before >>>> a new crisis will arise – either connected to Covid-19, to another virus >>>> or to another kind of emergency altogether.

We must face up to the fact that we are not well protected from a
government if it wanted to use a state of emergency to corrode our
freedoms. We have no written constitution, meaning it is more difficult >>>> for people to claim their rights, and – unlike in many other democracies >>>> – the courts are reluctant to become embroiled in cases involving
fundamental rights that involve political controversy. Government power >>>> has been on the rise for years, not least through the ever increasing
use of secondary legislation to set policy. And our public health
legislation remains extraordinarily broad.

CK Allen, scholar of the vast emergency powers built up during the
second world war, reminds us that freedom “is not easily gained, and, >>>> once surrendered – however necessary the surrender may be – is even less
easily regained”. As tempting as it is to put this dark period in our >>>> history behind us, it is only by looking back that we can, finally, hope >>>> to move forward.

Adam Wagner is a barrister at Doughty Street Chambers. His debut book is >>>> Emergency State: How We Lost Our Liberties in the Pandemic and Why it
Matters (Vintage)

The only *healthy* way to stop the pandemic, thereby saving lives, in
the U.K. & elsewhere is by rapidly ( http://bit.ly/RapidTestCOVID-19
) finding out at any given moment, including even while on-line, who
among us are unwittingly contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or
asymptomatic) in order to http://tinyurl.com/ConvinceItForward (John
15:12) for them to call their doctor and self-quarantine per their
doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic. Thus, we're hoping for the
best while preparing for the worse-case scenario of the Alpha lineage
mutations and others like the Omicron, Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota,
Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations combining via
slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like
http://tinyurl.com/Deltamicron that may render current COVID
vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no longer effective.

Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.

So how are you ?

I am wonderfully hungry!

AGAIN? For fuck's sake, gook, think of something ELSE to say to gook
Chung!

Mangina, you should try being wonderfully hungry.

Then you can be rapture ready and stop being a craven Nazi coward!

You are a Nazi.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know you
can not measure up.

You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.

You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.

You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of National Socialism.

Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you… which is why you choose minor children
as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent adults in a consensually sexual way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a
helpless victim, be it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a mental
hospital.

That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or honest
about it.


Michael

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc
XPost: soc.culture.greek, soc.culture.israel

Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:

On Sun, 16 Oct 2022 09:23:47 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

Professeur de merde, Mikhail Blumboig wrote:

On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 07:39:40 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

I am wonderfully hungry!

AGAIN? For fuck's sake, gook, think of something ELSE to say to gook
Chung!

Mangina, you should try being wonderfully hungry.

Gook, you need to give the freshly squeezed jew diarrhoea a rest.

Nithing, there you go again with your diarrhoea obsession!

Then you can be rapture ready and stop being a craven Nazi coward!

You ARE rapture ready for the ICE 5-0 and you can stop being a craven jewlover and ainlunguist!

I am an American so the ICE 5-0 is not after me.

There is nothing wrong with loving Jews.

You are a Nazi.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else

Yup.

Indeed.

Right on, all counts.

I sure, am.

No doubt, about it.

You got, THAT right.

YOU, on the other hand, are WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY below all else.

You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

Bill explains what nithings are.

http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence against civilians as “resistance.”

We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity. Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”

We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings

Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,

The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.

A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.

The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”

The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”

“Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’ destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and “unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.

The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.

This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.

In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)