Michael Ejercito wrote:I am wonderfully hungry!
https://archive.ph/0ivEm
Lockdown fanatics can’t escape blame for this scandal
Those who warned about the inevitable increase in non-Covid deaths were
denounced as selfish murderers
CAMILLA TOMINEY
ASSOCIATE EDITOR
19 August 2022 • 4:46pm
Camilla Tominey
NHS ambulances
Some time ago, I received a heartbreaking email from a lady called Lisa
King, detailing how Peter, her beloved husband of 21 years, had become a
tragic casualty of Covid.
The father of two, 62, did not catch coronavirus. He died on October 9,
2020 because he was repeatedly denied a face-to-face GP appointment
during the pandemic – only to be told that an urgent operation to remove >> his gallbladder had been delayed because of spiralling NHS waiting lists.
His sudden death, in agonising pain, was completely avoidable.
As Mrs King told me at the time: “To the decision makers, he is nothing
more than ‘collateral damage’, but to me, he is the love of my life.” >> When journalists like me heard these stories and warned that the
lockdown cure might be worse than the disease, we were accused of being
mercenary murderers intent on prioritising the economy ahead of saving
lives.
Scientists who dared to question the severity of the restrictions were,
as Lord Sumption put it at the time, “persecuted like Galileo”. Falsely >> branded “Covid deniers” simply for questioning some of the “science” >> that was slavishly followed, they were subjected to appalling online
abuse by a bunch of armchair experts who claimed to know better.
Professor Robert Dingwall faced career “cancellation” for refusing to
drink the zero-Covid Kool-Aid, as did the likes of Professor Carl
Heneghan, Professor Sunetra Gupta and leading oncologist Professor Karol
Sikora.
Yet now we learn that they were right to raise their concerns in the
face of pseudo-socialist Sage groupthink.
Official data now suggests that the effects of lockdown may be killing
more people than are currently dying of Covid.
An analysis by the Daily Telegraph’s brilliant science editor Sarah
Knapton (another figure who was pilloried for questioning the
pro-lockdown orthodoxy) has found that about 1,000 more people than
usual are dying each week from conditions other than coronavirus.
Figures released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on Tuesday
showed that excess deaths are 14.4 per cent higher than the five-year
average, equating to 1,350 more deaths than usual in the week ending
August 5. Although 469 deaths were linked to Covid, the remaining 881
have not been explained. Since the start of June, the ONS has recorded
almost 10,000 more deaths than the five-year average – about 1,086 a
week – none of them linked to coronavirus. This figure is more than
three times the number of people who died because of Covid over the same
period – 2,811.
The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) has asked for an
investigation into the data amid concern that the deaths are linked to
delays and deferment of treatment for conditions such as cancer,
diabetes, and heart disease.
Study the stats, by all means, but the DHSC might be better off simply
speaking to someone like Mrs King – along with many of the nation’s
leading oncologists and cardiologists.
In July, I visited Bart’s for a feature to mark the hospital’s 900th
anniversary next year – and the doctors I met there were in no doubt
about the detrimental effect successive lockdowns have had on non-Covid
patients. As breast cancer surgeon, Laura Johnson, explained: “It wasn’t >> that patients’ diagnoses were missed, it’s unfortunately because a
number of people didn’t come to hospital.
“They are then presenting now, 18 months later, with more advanced
disease. Half of our patients that are presenting with a cancer are
almost needing chemotherapy before surgery, whereas before that
percentage was much lower. And that’s because they’re presenting with a >> bigger, more aggressive, more advanced cancer.”
The horror stories are everywhere you look: from people dying needlessly
at home like Mr King, to elderly patients waiting 40 hours for
ambulances, to cancer sufferers now dying because they didn’t get
appointments during lockdown, or didn’t want to be a burden.
It’s tempting to blame this on the NHS being in urgent need of reform – >> and that’s surely part of the explanation. We all know how staff
shortages – again, exacerbated by the pandemic – are crippling the system.
But this isn’t simply a result of a lack of resources. Healthcare
spending has risen sharply as a percentage of GDP in recent years.
The nettle that needs to be grasped is that these figures suggest that
the country is facing a growing health crisis that has been caused by
our overzealous response to the pandemic – scaremongering policies that
kept people indoors, scared them away from hospitals and deprived them
of treatment.
These excess deaths may well turn out to be a direct consequence of the
decision to lock down the country in order to control a virus that was
only ever a serious threat to the old and the vulnerable.
Had a more proportionate approach been taken, akin to Sweden’s, then
would we be in this mess right now? Perhaps only a government inquiry
will be able definitively to answer that question, but what’s certain
now is the debate over the severity of lockdown was never about the
economy versus lives – as pro-shutdown fanatics would have it – but over >> lives versus lives.
At the start of the pandemic, the overreaction to the virus might have
been forgivable. We didn’t know much about Sars-CoV-2 and any hope of a
vaccine felt like a faraway fantasy.
But it rapidly became clear that many of the measures were
disproportionate and poorly targeted – and that too little thought had
been put to alternatives, like the focused protection scheme promoted by
those who signed the Great Barrington Declaration, in which those
actually vulnerable to Covid were properly shielded.
Lest we forget that in the last quarter of 2020, the mean age of those
dying with and of Covid was estimated to be 82.4 years, while the risk
of dying of it if you were under 60 was less than 0.5 per cent. Who
wouldn’t now take those odds compared to being diagnosed with cancer,
circulatory or cardiovascular related conditions and being made to wait
months for post-pandemic treatment?
None of this has come as a surprise to those running organisations like
the British Heart Foundation or the Stroke Foundation, which had
predicted a sharp rise in deaths because “people haven’t been having
their routine appointments for the past few years now”.
And let’s not even get started on the mental health toll taken by the
Government’s panic-mongering. Or the negative effect that work from home >> edicts have had on our already sedentary lifestyles, alcohol intake and
waistlines. Not to mention the adverse impact on the education of a
Covid generation whose schools and universities should, in hindsight,
never, ever have been shut.
The World Health Organisation said at the time that the Great Barrington
Declaration “lacked scientific basis”, but nearly three years on from
the start of the pandemic there has been precious little analysis of
whether the raft of Covid restrictions either served the collective good
– or actually saved lives in the round – compared with the lives that
are now being lost as a result.
These numbers aren’t just statistics – they are people’s husbands,
wives, brothers, sisters, daughters and sons. The appalling truth is
that a lot of these people would probably still be here today were it
not for the lockdowns; lockdowns which seemingly did little to stop tens
of thousands of people dying of Covid in the UK.
We stayed at home to “protect the NHS”. It turns out the NHS isn’t there
now to protect us.
The only *healthy* way to stop the pandemic, thereby saving lives, in
the U.K. & elsewhere is by rapidly ( http://bit.ly/RapidTestCOVID-19
) finding out at any given moment, including even while on-line, who
among us are unwittingly contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or
asymptomatic) in order to http://tinyurl.com/ConvinceItForward (John
15:12) for them to call their doctor and self-quarantine per their
doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic. Thus, we're hoping for the
best while preparing for the worse-case scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron, Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota,
Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations combining via
slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like
http://tinyurl.com/Deltamicron that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no longer effective.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
So how are you ?
https://archive.ph/0ivEm
Lockdown fanatics cant escape blame for this scandal
Those who warned about the inevitable increase in non-Covid deaths were >denounced as selfish murderers
CAMILLA TOMINEY
ASSOCIATE EDITOR
19 August 2022 4:46pm
Camilla Tominey
NHS ambulances
Some time ago, I received a heartbreaking email from a lady called Lisa
King, detailing how Peter, her beloved husband of 21 years, had become a >tragic casualty of Covid.
The father of two, 62, did not catch coronavirus. He died on October 9,
2020 because he was repeatedly denied a face-to-face GP appointment
during the pandemic only to be told that an urgent operation to remove
his gallbladder had been delayed because of spiralling NHS waiting lists.
His sudden death, in agonising pain, was completely avoidable.
As Mrs King told me at the time: To the decision makers, he is nothing
more than collateral damage, but to me, he is the love of my life.
When journalists like me heard these stories and warned that the
lockdown cure might be worse than the disease, we were accused of being >mercenary murderers intent on prioritising the economy ahead of saving
lives.
Scientists who dared to question the severity of the restrictions were,
as Lord Sumption put it at the time, persecuted like Galileo. Falsely >branded Covid deniers simply for questioning some of the science
that was slavishly followed, they were subjected to appalling online
abuse by a bunch of armchair experts who claimed to know better.
Professor Robert Dingwall faced career cancellation for refusing to
drink the zero-Covid Kool-Aid, as did the likes of Professor Carl
Heneghan, Professor Sunetra Gupta and leading oncologist Professor Karol >Sikora.
Yet now we learn that they were right to raise their concerns in the
face of pseudo-socialist Sage groupthink.
Official data now suggests that the effects of lockdown may be killing
more people than are currently dying of Covid.
An analysis by the Daily Telegraphs brilliant science editor Sarah
Knapton (another figure who was pilloried for questioning the
pro-lockdown orthodoxy) has found that about 1,000 more people than
usual are dying each week from conditions other than coronavirus.
Figures released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on Tuesday >showed that excess deaths are 14.4 per cent higher than the five-year >average, equating to 1,350 more deaths than usual in the week ending
August 5. Although 469 deaths were linked to Covid, the remaining 881
have not been explained. Since the start of June, the ONS has recorded
almost 10,000 more deaths than the five-year average about 1,086 a
week none of them linked to coronavirus. This figure is more than
three times the number of people who died because of Covid over the same >period 2,811.
The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) has asked for an >investigation into the data amid concern that the deaths are linked to
delays and deferment of treatment for conditions such as cancer,
diabetes, and heart disease.
Study the stats, by all means, but the DHSC might be better off simply >speaking to someone like Mrs King along with many of the nations
leading oncologists and cardiologists.
In July, I visited Barts for a feature to mark the hospitals 900th >anniversary next year and the doctors I met there were in no doubt
about the detrimental effect successive lockdowns have had on non-Covid >patients. As breast cancer surgeon, Laura Johnson, explained: It wasnt
that patients diagnoses were missed, its unfortunately because a
number of people didnt come to hospital.
They are then presenting now, 18 months later, with more advanced
disease. Half of our patients that are presenting with a cancer are
almost needing chemotherapy before surgery, whereas before that
percentage was much lower. And thats because theyre presenting with a >bigger, more aggressive, more advanced cancer.
The horror stories are everywhere you look: from people dying needlessly
at home like Mr King, to elderly patients waiting 40 hours for
ambulances, to cancer sufferers now dying because they didnt get >appointments during lockdown, or didnt want to be a burden.
Its tempting to blame this on the NHS being in urgent need of reform
and thats surely part of the explanation. We all know how staff
shortages again, exacerbated by the pandemic are crippling the system. >But this isnt simply a result of a lack of resources. Healthcare
spending has risen sharply as a percentage of GDP in recent years.
The nettle that needs to be grasped is that these figures suggest that
the country is facing a growing health crisis that has been caused by
our overzealous response to the pandemic scaremongering policies that
kept people indoors, scared them away from hospitals and deprived them
of treatment.
These excess deaths may well turn out to be a direct consequence of the >decision to lock down the country in order to control a virus that was
only ever a serious threat to the old and the vulnerable.
Had a more proportionate approach been taken, akin to Swedens, then
would we be in this mess right now? Perhaps only a government inquiry
will be able definitively to answer that question, but whats certain
now is the debate over the severity of lockdown was never about the
economy versus lives as pro-shutdown fanatics would have it but over >lives versus lives.
At the start of the pandemic, the overreaction to the virus might have
been forgivable. We didnt know much about Sars-CoV-2 and any hope of a >vaccine felt like a faraway fantasy.
But it rapidly became clear that many of the measures were
disproportionate and poorly targeted and that too little thought had
been put to alternatives, like the focused protection scheme promoted by >those who signed the Great Barrington Declaration, in which those
actually vulnerable to Covid were properly shielded.
Lest we forget that in the last quarter of 2020, the mean age of those
dying with and of Covid was estimated to be 82.4 years, while the risk
of dying of it if you were under 60 was less than 0.5 per cent. Who
wouldnt now take those odds compared to being diagnosed with cancer, >circulatory or cardiovascular related conditions and being made to wait >months for post-pandemic treatment?
None of this has come as a surprise to those running organisations like
the British Heart Foundation or the Stroke Foundation, which had
predicted a sharp rise in deaths because people havent been having
their routine appointments for the past few years now.
And lets not even get started on the mental health toll taken by the >Governments panic-mongering. Or the negative effect that work from home >edicts have had on our already sedentary lifestyles, alcohol intake and >waistlines. Not to mention the adverse impact on the education of a
Covid generation whose schools and universities should, in hindsight,
never, ever have been shut.
The World Health Organisation said at the time that the Great Barrington >Declaration lacked scientific basis, but nearly three years on from
the start of the pandemic there has been precious little analysis of
whether the raft of Covid restrictions either served the collective good
or actually saved lives in the round compared with the lives that
are now being lost as a result.
These numbers arent just statistics they are peoples husbands,
wives, brothers, sisters, daughters and sons. The appalling truth is
that a lot of these people would probably still be here today were it
not for the lockdowns; lockdowns which seemingly did little to stop tens
of thousands of people dying of Covid in the UK.
We stayed at home to protect the NHS. It turns out the NHS isnt there
now to protect us.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
https://archive.ph/0ivEm
Lockdown fanatics cant escape blame for this scandal
Those who warned about the inevitable increase in non-Covid deaths were
denounced as selfish murderers
CAMILLA TOMINEY
ASSOCIATE EDITOR
19 August 2022 4:46pm
Camilla Tominey
NHS ambulances
Some time ago, I received a heartbreaking email from a lady called Lisa
King, detailing how Peter, her beloved husband of 21 years, had become a >>> tragic casualty of Covid.
The father of two, 62, did not catch coronavirus. He died on October 9,
2020 because he was repeatedly denied a face-to-face GP appointment
during the pandemic only to be told that an urgent operation to remove >>> his gallbladder had been delayed because of spiralling NHS waiting lists. >>> His sudden death, in agonising pain, was completely avoidable.
As Mrs King told me at the time: To the decision makers, he is nothing
more than collateral damage, but to me, he is the love of my life.
When journalists like me heard these stories and warned that the
lockdown cure might be worse than the disease, we were accused of being
mercenary murderers intent on prioritising the economy ahead of saving
lives.
Scientists who dared to question the severity of the restrictions were,
as Lord Sumption put it at the time, persecuted like Galileo. Falsely
branded Covid deniers simply for questioning some of the science
that was slavishly followed, they were subjected to appalling online
abuse by a bunch of armchair experts who claimed to know better.
Professor Robert Dingwall faced career cancellation for refusing to
drink the zero-Covid Kool-Aid, as did the likes of Professor Carl
Heneghan, Professor Sunetra Gupta and leading oncologist Professor Karol >>> Sikora.
Yet now we learn that they were right to raise their concerns in the
face of pseudo-socialist Sage groupthink.
Official data now suggests that the effects of lockdown may be killing
more people than are currently dying of Covid.
An analysis by the Daily Telegraphs brilliant science editor Sarah
Knapton (another figure who was pilloried for questioning the
pro-lockdown orthodoxy) has found that about 1,000 more people than
usual are dying each week from conditions other than coronavirus.
Figures released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on Tuesday
showed that excess deaths are 14.4 per cent higher than the five-year
average, equating to 1,350 more deaths than usual in the week ending
August 5. Although 469 deaths were linked to Covid, the remaining 881
have not been explained. Since the start of June, the ONS has recorded
almost 10,000 more deaths than the five-year average about 1,086 a
week none of them linked to coronavirus. This figure is more than
three times the number of people who died because of Covid over the same >>> period 2,811.
The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) has asked for an
investigation into the data amid concern that the deaths are linked to
delays and deferment of treatment for conditions such as cancer,
diabetes, and heart disease.
Study the stats, by all means, but the DHSC might be better off simply
speaking to someone like Mrs King along with many of the nations
leading oncologists and cardiologists.
In July, I visited Barts for a feature to mark the hospitals 900th
anniversary next year and the doctors I met there were in no doubt
about the detrimental effect successive lockdowns have had on non-Covid
patients. As breast cancer surgeon, Laura Johnson, explained: It wasnt >>> that patients diagnoses were missed, its unfortunately because a
number of people didnt come to hospital.
They are then presenting now, 18 months later, with more advanced
disease. Half of our patients that are presenting with a cancer are
almost needing chemotherapy before surgery, whereas before that
percentage was much lower. And thats because theyre presenting with a
bigger, more aggressive, more advanced cancer.
The horror stories are everywhere you look: from people dying needlessly >>> at home like Mr King, to elderly patients waiting 40 hours for
ambulances, to cancer sufferers now dying because they didnt get
appointments during lockdown, or didnt want to be a burden.
Its tempting to blame this on the NHS being in urgent need of reform
and thats surely part of the explanation. We all know how staff
shortages again, exacerbated by the pandemic are crippling the system. >>> But this isnt simply a result of a lack of resources. Healthcare
spending has risen sharply as a percentage of GDP in recent years.
The nettle that needs to be grasped is that these figures suggest that
the country is facing a growing health crisis that has been caused by
our overzealous response to the pandemic scaremongering policies that
kept people indoors, scared them away from hospitals and deprived them
of treatment.
These excess deaths may well turn out to be a direct consequence of the
decision to lock down the country in order to control a virus that was
only ever a serious threat to the old and the vulnerable.
Had a more proportionate approach been taken, akin to Swedens, then
would we be in this mess right now? Perhaps only a government inquiry
will be able definitively to answer that question, but whats certain
now is the debate over the severity of lockdown was never about the
economy versus lives as pro-shutdown fanatics would have it but over >>> lives versus lives.
At the start of the pandemic, the overreaction to the virus might have
been forgivable. We didnt know much about Sars-CoV-2 and any hope of a
vaccine felt like a faraway fantasy.
But it rapidly became clear that many of the measures were
disproportionate and poorly targeted and that too little thought had
been put to alternatives, like the focused protection scheme promoted by >>> those who signed the Great Barrington Declaration, in which those
actually vulnerable to Covid were properly shielded.
Lest we forget that in the last quarter of 2020, the mean age of those
dying with and of Covid was estimated to be 82.4 years, while the risk
of dying of it if you were under 60 was less than 0.5 per cent. Who
wouldnt now take those odds compared to being diagnosed with cancer,
circulatory or cardiovascular related conditions and being made to wait
months for post-pandemic treatment?
None of this has come as a surprise to those running organisations like
the British Heart Foundation or the Stroke Foundation, which had
predicted a sharp rise in deaths because people havent been having
their routine appointments for the past few years now.
And lets not even get started on the mental health toll taken by the
Governments panic-mongering. Or the negative effect that work from home >>> edicts have had on our already sedentary lifestyles, alcohol intake and
waistlines. Not to mention the adverse impact on the education of a
Covid generation whose schools and universities should, in hindsight,
never, ever have been shut.
The World Health Organisation said at the time that the Great Barrington >>> Declaration lacked scientific basis, but nearly three years on from
the start of the pandemic there has been precious little analysis of
whether the raft of Covid restrictions either served the collective good >>> or actually saved lives in the round compared with the lives that
are now being lost as a result.
These numbers arent just statistics they are peoples husbands,
wives, brothers, sisters, daughters and sons. The appalling truth is
that a lot of these people would probably still be here today were it
not for the lockdowns; lockdowns which seemingly did little to stop tens >>> of thousands of people dying of Covid in the UK.
We stayed at home to protect the NHS. It turns out the NHS isnt there >>> now to protect us.
The only *healthy* way to stop the pandemic, thereby saving lives, in
the U.K. & elsewhere is by rapidly ( http://bit.ly/RapidTestCOVID-19
) finding out at any given moment, including even while on-line, who
among us are unwittingly contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or
asymptomatic) in order to http://tinyurl.com/ConvinceItForward (John
15:12) for them to call their doctor and self-quarantine per their
doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic. Thus, we're hoping for the
best while preparing for the worse-case scenario of the Alpha lineage
mutations and others like the Omicron, Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota,
Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations combining via
slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like
http://tinyurl.com/Deltamicron that may render current COVID
vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no longer effective.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!
Michael Ejercito wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
https://archive.ph/0ivEm
Lockdown fanatics cant escape blame for this scandal
Those who warned about the inevitable increase in non-Covid deaths were >>>> denounced as selfish murderers
CAMILLA TOMINEY
ASSOCIATE EDITOR
19 August 2022 4:46pm
Camilla Tominey
NHS ambulances
Some time ago, I received a heartbreaking email from a lady called Lisa >>>> King, detailing how Peter, her beloved husband of 21 years, had become a >>>> tragic casualty of Covid.
The father of two, 62, did not catch coronavirus. He died on October 9, >>>> 2020 because he was repeatedly denied a face-to-face GP appointment
during the pandemic only to be told that an urgent operation to remove >>>> his gallbladder had been delayed because of spiralling NHS waiting lists. >>>> His sudden death, in agonising pain, was completely avoidable.
As Mrs King told me at the time: To the decision makers, he is nothing >>>> more than collateral damage, but to me, he is the love of my life.
When journalists like me heard these stories and warned that the
lockdown cure might be worse than the disease, we were accused of being >>>> mercenary murderers intent on prioritising the economy ahead of saving >>>> lives.
Scientists who dared to question the severity of the restrictions were, >>>> as Lord Sumption put it at the time, persecuted like Galileo. Falsely >>>> branded Covid deniers simply for questioning some of the science
that was slavishly followed, they were subjected to appalling online
abuse by a bunch of armchair experts who claimed to know better.
Professor Robert Dingwall faced career cancellation for refusing to
drink the zero-Covid Kool-Aid, as did the likes of Professor Carl
Heneghan, Professor Sunetra Gupta and leading oncologist Professor Karol >>>> Sikora.
Yet now we learn that they were right to raise their concerns in the
face of pseudo-socialist Sage groupthink.
Official data now suggests that the effects of lockdown may be killing >>>> more people than are currently dying of Covid.
An analysis by the Daily Telegraphs brilliant science editor Sarah
Knapton (another figure who was pilloried for questioning the
pro-lockdown orthodoxy) has found that about 1,000 more people than
usual are dying each week from conditions other than coronavirus.
Figures released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on Tuesday >>>> showed that excess deaths are 14.4 per cent higher than the five-year
average, equating to 1,350 more deaths than usual in the week ending
August 5. Although 469 deaths were linked to Covid, the remaining 881
have not been explained. Since the start of June, the ONS has recorded >>>> almost 10,000 more deaths than the five-year average about 1,086 a
week none of them linked to coronavirus. This figure is more than
three times the number of people who died because of Covid over the same >>>> period 2,811.
The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) has asked for an
investigation into the data amid concern that the deaths are linked to >>>> delays and deferment of treatment for conditions such as cancer,
diabetes, and heart disease.
Study the stats, by all means, but the DHSC might be better off simply >>>> speaking to someone like Mrs King along with many of the nations
leading oncologists and cardiologists.
In July, I visited Barts for a feature to mark the hospitals 900th
anniversary next year and the doctors I met there were in no doubt
about the detrimental effect successive lockdowns have had on non-Covid >>>> patients. As breast cancer surgeon, Laura Johnson, explained: It wasnt >>>> that patients diagnoses were missed, its unfortunately because a
number of people didnt come to hospital.
They are then presenting now, 18 months later, with more advanced
disease. Half of our patients that are presenting with a cancer are
almost needing chemotherapy before surgery, whereas before that
percentage was much lower. And thats because theyre presenting with a >>>> bigger, more aggressive, more advanced cancer.
The horror stories are everywhere you look: from people dying needlessly >>>> at home like Mr King, to elderly patients waiting 40 hours for
ambulances, to cancer sufferers now dying because they didnt get
appointments during lockdown, or didnt want to be a burden.
Its tempting to blame this on the NHS being in urgent need of reform >>>> and thats surely part of the explanation. We all know how staff
shortages again, exacerbated by the pandemic are crippling the system. >>>> But this isnt simply a result of a lack of resources. Healthcare
spending has risen sharply as a percentage of GDP in recent years.
The nettle that needs to be grasped is that these figures suggest that >>>> the country is facing a growing health crisis that has been caused by
our overzealous response to the pandemic scaremongering policies that >>>> kept people indoors, scared them away from hospitals and deprived them >>>> of treatment.
These excess deaths may well turn out to be a direct consequence of the >>>> decision to lock down the country in order to control a virus that was >>>> only ever a serious threat to the old and the vulnerable.
Had a more proportionate approach been taken, akin to Swedens, then
would we be in this mess right now? Perhaps only a government inquiry
will be able definitively to answer that question, but whats certain
now is the debate over the severity of lockdown was never about the
economy versus lives as pro-shutdown fanatics would have it but over >>>> lives versus lives.
At the start of the pandemic, the overreaction to the virus might have >>>> been forgivable. We didnt know much about Sars-CoV-2 and any hope of a >>>> vaccine felt like a faraway fantasy.
But it rapidly became clear that many of the measures were
disproportionate and poorly targeted and that too little thought had >>>> been put to alternatives, like the focused protection scheme promoted by >>>> those who signed the Great Barrington Declaration, in which those
actually vulnerable to Covid were properly shielded.
Lest we forget that in the last quarter of 2020, the mean age of those >>>> dying with and of Covid was estimated to be 82.4 years, while the risk >>>> of dying of it if you were under 60 was less than 0.5 per cent. Who
wouldnt now take those odds compared to being diagnosed with cancer,
circulatory or cardiovascular related conditions and being made to wait >>>> months for post-pandemic treatment?
None of this has come as a surprise to those running organisations like >>>> the British Heart Foundation or the Stroke Foundation, which had
predicted a sharp rise in deaths because people havent been having
their routine appointments for the past few years now.
And lets not even get started on the mental health toll taken by the
Governments panic-mongering. Or the negative effect that work from home >>>> edicts have had on our already sedentary lifestyles, alcohol intake and >>>> waistlines. Not to mention the adverse impact on the education of a
Covid generation whose schools and universities should, in hindsight,
never, ever have been shut.
The World Health Organisation said at the time that the Great Barrington >>>> Declaration lacked scientific basis, but nearly three years on from
the start of the pandemic there has been precious little analysis of
whether the raft of Covid restrictions either served the collective good >>>> or actually saved lives in the round compared with the lives that
are now being lost as a result.
These numbers arent just statistics they are peoples husbands,
wives, brothers, sisters, daughters and sons. The appalling truth is
that a lot of these people would probably still be here today were it
not for the lockdowns; lockdowns which seemingly did little to stop tens >>>> of thousands of people dying of Covid in the UK.
We stayed at home to protect the NHS. It turns out the NHS isnt there >>>> now to protect us.
The only *healthy* way to stop the pandemic, thereby saving lives, in
the U.K. & elsewhere is by rapidly ( http://bit.ly/RapidTestCOVID-19
) finding out at any given moment, including even while on-line, who
among us are unwittingly contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or
asymptomatic) in order to http://tinyurl.com/ConvinceItForward (John
15:12) for them to call their doctor and self-quarantine per their
doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic. Thus, we're hoping for the
best while preparing for the worse-case scenario of the Alpha lineage
mutations and others like the Omicron, Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota,
Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations combining via
slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like
http://tinyurl.com/Deltamicron that may render current COVID
vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no longer effective.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!
While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as circling eagles don't have COVID) and
pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6) Father in
Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy Spirit
(Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to always >say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways including >especially caring to http://tinyurl.com/ConvinceItForward (John 15:12
as shown by http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest ) with all glory ( >http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO !
Suggested further reading: >https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/5EWtT4CwCOg/m/QjNF57xRBAAJ
Shorter link:
http://bit.ly/StatCOVID-19Test
Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
ongoingJohn wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an
status. He includes himself in that status.
sins,1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our
word isand to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his
not in us.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
ongoingJohn wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an
status. He includes himself in that status.
sins,1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our
word isand to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his
not in us.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
ongoingJohn wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an
status. He includes himself in that status.
sins,1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our
word isand to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his
not in us.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Culture/camilla-queen-consort-tests-positive-covid/story?id=97084680
Camilla, the Queen Consort, tests positive for COVID
She had earlier announced she was dealing with "seasonal illness."
ByZoe Magee and Katie Kindelan via logo
February 13, 2023, 9:34 AM
1:23
Plans for King Charles Coronation announced
The King and Queen Consort Camilla will be crowned on May 6 at
Westminster Abbey.
Camilla, the Queen Consort, has tested positive for COVID-19, according
to Buckingham Palace.
King Charles' wife had been forced to postpone a visit to the West
Midlands on Tuesday, with the palace initially saying she had contracted >>> a "seasonal illness."
"With regret, she has therefore cancelled all of her public engagements
for this week and sends her sincere apologies to those who had been due
to attend them," the palace said in a statement.
PHOTO: Queen Consort Camilla visits the S.T.O.R.M Family Centre, in
London, Feb. 9, 2023.
Queen Consort Camilla visits the S.T.O.R.M Family Centre, in London,
Feb. 9, 2023.
Toby Melville/Reuters, FILE
Camilla is "fully vaccinated" against COVID-19, according to the palace. >>>
The 75-year-old previously tested positive for COVID-19 nearly one year
ago to the date.
Editors Picks
With Queen Elizabeth II's death, Camilla becomes Queen Consort: What to know
Queen Camilla is a mom of 2: What to know about her children
Prince Harry says he has 'huge amount of compassion' for Queen Camilla
MORE: King Charles III's coronation: What to expect, the traditions and
symbolism explained
Charles also had the virus in February last year. Each self-isolated at
the time and did not require hospitalization.
Charles's mother, the late Queen Elizabeth II, then also tested positive >>> for COVID-19 shortly after Charles and Camilla's illnesses were
confirmed, the palace said at the time.
The queen, who died in September at age 96, had only "mild cold-like
symptoms" as a result of the virus, according to the palace.
However, after her acute COVID illness, she subsequently had weeks of
"mobility issues" causing her to cancel many events. For this reason,
it is probable that the proximate cause of her death was undiagnosed
long-COVID.
MORE: As Queen Consort, Camilla steps into role as matriarch of royal familyThe only *healthy* way to stop the pandemic, thereby saving lives, in
Camilla became queen consort after the queen's death.
The coronation for Charles and Camilla is scheduled to take place in May. >>
the UK & elsewhere is by rapidly ( http://bit.ly/RapidTestCOVID-19
) finding out at any given moment, including even while on-line, who
among us are unwittingly contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or
asymptomatic) in order to http://tinyurl.com/ConvinceItForward (John
15:12) for them to call their doctor and self-quarantine per their
doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic. Thus, we're hoping for the
best while preparing for the worse-case scenario of the Alpha lineage
mutations and others like the Omicron, Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota,
Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations combining via
slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like
http://tinyurl.com/Deltamicron that may render current COVID
vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no longer effective.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 302 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 122:56:59 |
| Calls: | 6,769 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,299 |
| Messages: | 5,376,794 |
| Posted today: | 2 |