XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel

On Monday, May 30, 2022 at 9:32:50 AM UTC-7, HeartDoc Andrew wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

http://www.spectator.co.uk/article/boris-johnsons-guilt


Boris Johnson’s guilt
From magazine issue: 28 May 2022
Boris Johnson’s guilt
Text settings
Comments
Share




An ability to survive narrow scrapes has been one of Boris Johnson’s >>> defining qualities. The pictures of Downing Street’s lockdown social >>> events included in the Sue Gray report were so dull as to be almost
exculpatory: staid gatherings of half a dozen people around a

long table

with sandwiches still in their boxes, apple juice poured into a

whisky

glass. Far worse happened in No. 10 but Gray did not publish those
photos or look into (for example) the ‘Abba’ party in the No. 10

flat,

saying she felt it inappropriate to do so while police were
investigating. Luckily for Johnson.

The more damaging material came from the emails intercepted, with

No. 10

staff being clear that they knew they were breaking the rules

they had

collectively designed and enforced on the country. The emails

show No.

10 staff asked to hide wine bottles from the cameras – then joked

that

they seemed to have ‘got away with’ drinks parties that broke the

law.

But in the end, they did not get away with it. The Prime Minister
remains guilty – most explicitly of misleading the House of

Commons when

he denied that any parties took place. He has shown a serious

failure,

too, in not learning from his mistakes. It is no use him or

anyone else

in government complaining about the triviality of the charges. His
government put the lockdown laws on the statute book in the first

place,

framing them in such a way as to criminalise everyday interactions.

Now the Prime Minister’s allies plead for clemency. It is in human
nature, they say, to gather to bid farewell to a departing friend or
colleague, to offer friendship and succour. Quite so. Johnson’s

allies

further argue that, as he raised his glass in a toast, he did so

in a

work capacity – as evidenced by the presence of his red box. This
Jesuitical defence would be more plausible if the government’s

laws had

not seen ordinary people dragged to court and found guilty of far

milder

offences. Let us consider his defence for the leaving party:

“
I briefly attended such gatherings to thank them for their service – >>> which I believe is one of the essential duties of leadership.
Particularly important when people need to feel that their

contributions

had been appreciated and to keep morale as high as possible.
Does he realise, even now, that he made it illegal for anyone to

do this

during lockdown? Where, in his lockdown rules, was the exemption

for the

‘essential duties of leadership?’ Where was the clause allowing

those

outside the ruling elite to have a regular ‘wine-time Friday?’

Does he

realise that he personally used the powers of his office to send the
police after anyone else who would have attended a gathering to

salute a

departing colleague? Or, for that matter, to console a friend,

visit a

dying relative or even attend a funeral in numbers greater than
stipulated by the staff of No. 10.

The Prime Minister said it was ‘right’ to salute former

colleagues in a

leaving party. He’s quite correct in that it is a decent, humane

thing

to do. But consider the childminder in Manchester who was fined for
delivering a birthday card to a child in her care: was it ‘right’

for

her to do so? Of course. Did this help her, when police

intercepted her

to enforce the Prime Minister’s rules and took her to court? Not one >>> bit. His needless, draconian lockdown rules were enforced by

police upon

millions of people, with tens of thousands taken to court. No one

– not

the pensioner in his allotment, not the mother celebrating her

child’s

birthday with two friends – had the chance to argue before the
magistrates that what they were doing was ‘right’.

When police went after two women in Derbyshire for the crime of

walking

through a park with takeaway coffee, one might also ask: was it

‘right’

for them to seek each other’s company and avail themselves of the

basic

liberty of a free country? Of course. Did Johnson’s laws prohibit

this?

Unforgivably: yes. And this is the point.

Most popular
Gavin Mortimer
Marine Le Pen is right to defend Liverpool fans
Marine Le Pen is right to defend Liverpool fans
So to hear him now talk about what was ‘right’ and ‘decent’ is

hard to

swallow. This magazine argued for him to decriminalise lockdown

rules,

to offer guidance and leave people to judge what is ‘right’ – as was
being done with much success in Sweden and several states of

America.

But Johnson refused to do so, preferring to turn Britain into a

police

state. While having every intention of flouting the laws when he
considered it opportune to do so.

How ironic that in the November 2020 photograph of Boris Johnson

raising

a toast to the spin doctor he had forced to resign, a copy of The
Spectator can be seen resting on the table. This magazine had argued
against that month’s lockdown and its needless criminalisation of
everyday life. By then, the logic for lockdowns had collapsed. But,
thanks in part to a supine opposition, No. 10 pressed ahead anyway.
Those leaving drinks took place when all other social gatherings had
been banned under pain of huge fines.

Lockdowns involved the passing of the most damaging, illiberal

laws in

British postwar history. The social and economic cost is still being
counted. Johnson is guilty not simply of breaking his own rules,

but of

failing to assess if those rules even worked. The sheer scale of

the law

demanded a rigorous assessment of the policies behind it, but no

serious

cost-benefit analysis was conducted. Nor were studies

commissioned to

ask why infections seemed to have peaked before the previous

lockdown.

And no one is now asking why, if lockdown was the only means of

holding

back a Covid wave, Sweden has done so well without ever imposing

one.

The Prime Minister has not been ‘vindicated’ as he claims. No one

who

spent months trying to abide by his lockdown laws is under any

doubt of

what went on. He is guilty of presiding over a gung-ho culture in

which

lockdown advocates were never properly challenged. He allowed

himself to

be bounced into taking deeply damaging decisions. His own

instinct to

resist lockdown was not enough: he could have assembled ‘red-team’ >>> advisers to challenge Sage. He could have asked the Treasury for a
cost-benefit analysis of lockdown. He could have made the second
lockdown a matter of guidance, not of law. Instead he closed society
down over and over again, asking his aides to implement laws they
themselves regularly flouted.

Johnson has further opened himself to charges of hypocrisy

through his

confected fury about his former spokeswoman Allegra Stratton, who
resigned after being caught on camera making light of the parties

that

were being held in No. 10. There is no suggestion that she broke any
rules. She was poking fun at the absurdity of the law and of

being asked

to defend such a ridiculous situation.

Her laughter, Johnson declared, had caused national anger – an anger >>> that he said he shared. He was shocked – shocked! – to find any such >>> behaviour was happening in No. 10. Stratton resigned on

principle, the

only person in No. 10 to have done so.

It is a damning – and accurate – charge against the Prime

Minister that

he is no man of principle. Weakness in personal conduct need not
necessarily make a bad prime minister – Johnson’s hero Winston

Churchill

drank to excess for most of the second world war. The important

part of

leadership is getting the big decisions right. Johnson is often

said to

be a leader who manages to do just that – and certainly on

Ukraine that

claim can reasonably be made. But on Covid and lockdowns (and,

recently,

tax rises) he got some big decisions very wrong. His predicament

over

partygate is testament to that.

His failure to be guided by his instinctive liberalism has led

him to

the worst and most avoidable disasters of his premiership. He can

still

learn from these mistakes. But we are more than halfway through this
parliament: he does not have much time left.

The only *healthy* way to stop the pandemic, thereby saving lives, in
the U.K. & elsewhere is by rapidly (

http://bit.ly/RapidTestCOVID-19 )

finding out at any given moment, including even while on-line, who
among us are unwittingly contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or
asymptomatic) in order to http://tinyurl.com/ConvinceItForward (John
15:12) for them to call their doctor and self-quarantine per their
doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic. Thus, we're hoping for the
best while preparing for the worse-case scenario of the Alpha lineage
mutations and others like the Omicron, Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota,
Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations combining via
slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like
http://tinyurl.com/Deltamicron that may render current COVID
vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no longer effective.

Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.

So how are you ?

I am wonderfully hungry!

Source:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.bible.prophecy/c/n0MJtTUSf6k/m/9s4VpEk3AgAJ

Shorter link:
https://tinyurl.com/Negative053022
Positive control on USENET:

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/7ixdk7t6Bk8/m/xpbS2z7QAAAJ

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as circling eagles don't have COVID) and
pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6) Father in
Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy Spirit
(Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways including especially caring to http://tinyurl.com/ConvinceItForward (John 15:12
as shown by http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest ) with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

Thank you for noting that I have no COVID.


Michael

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
XPost: alt.christnet.christianlife

Michael Ejercito wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

http://www.spectator.co.uk/article/boris-johnsons-guilt


Boris Johnson�s guilt
From magazine issue: 28 May 2022
Boris Johnson�s guilt
Text settings
Comments
Share




An ability to survive narrow scrapes has been one of Boris Johnson�s >>> defining qualities. The pictures of Downing Street�s lockdown social >>> events included in the Sue Gray report were so dull as to be almost
exculpatory: staid gatherings of half a dozen people around a

long table

with sandwiches still in their boxes, apple juice poured into a

whisky

glass. Far worse happened in No. 10 but Gray did not publish those
photos or look into (for example) the �Abba� party in the No. 10

flat,

saying she felt it inappropriate to do so while police were
investigating. Luckily for Johnson.

The more damaging material came from the emails intercepted, with

No. 10

staff being clear that they knew they were breaking the rules

they had

collectively designed and enforced on the country. The emails

show No.

10 staff asked to hide wine bottles from the cameras � then joked

that

they seemed to have �got away with� drinks parties that broke the

law.

But in the end, they did not get away with it. The Prime Minister
remains guilty � most explicitly of misleading the House of

Commons when

he denied that any parties took place. He has shown a serious

failure,

too, in not learning from his mistakes. It is no use him or

anyone else

in government complaining about the triviality of the charges. His
government put the lockdown laws on the statute book in the first

place,

framing them in such a way as to criminalise everyday interactions.

Now the Prime Minister�s allies plead for clemency. It is in human
nature, they say, to gather to bid farewell to a departing friend or >>> colleague, to offer friendship and succour. Quite so. Johnson�s

allies

further argue that, as he raised his glass in a toast, he did so

in a

work capacity � as evidenced by the presence of his red box. This
Jesuitical defence would be more plausible if the government�s

laws had

not seen ordinary people dragged to court and found guilty of far

milder

offences. Let us consider his defence for the leaving party:

�
I briefly attended such gatherings to thank them for their service � >>> which I believe is one of the essential duties of leadership.
Particularly important when people need to feel that their

contributions

had been appreciated and to keep morale as high as possible.
Does he realise, even now, that he made it illegal for anyone to

do this

during lockdown? Where, in his lockdown rules, was the exemption

for the

�essential duties of leadership?� Where was the clause allowing

those

outside the ruling elite to have a regular �wine-time Friday?�

Does he

realise that he personally used the powers of his office to send the >>> police after anyone else who would have attended a gathering to

salute a

departing colleague? Or, for that matter, to console a friend,

visit a

dying relative or even attend a funeral in numbers greater than
stipulated by the staff of No. 10.

The Prime Minister said it was �right� to salute former

colleagues in a

leaving party. He�s quite correct in that it is a decent, humane

thing

to do. But consider the childminder in Manchester who was fined for
delivering a birthday card to a child in her care: was it �right�

for

her to do so? Of course. Did this help her, when police

intercepted her

to enforce the Prime Minister�s rules and took her to court? Not one >>> bit. His needless, draconian lockdown rules were enforced by

police upon

millions of people, with tens of thousands taken to court. No one

� not

the pensioner in his allotment, not the mother celebrating her

child�s

birthday with two friends � had the chance to argue before the
magistrates that what they were doing was �right�.

When police went after two women in Derbyshire for the crime of

walking

through a park with takeaway coffee, one might also ask: was it

�right�

for them to seek each other�s company and avail themselves of the

basic

liberty of a free country? Of course. Did Johnson�s laws prohibit

this?

Unforgivably: yes. And this is the point.

Most popular
Gavin Mortimer
Marine Le Pen is right to defend Liverpool fans
Marine Le Pen is right to defend Liverpool fans
So to hear him now talk about what was �right� and �decent� is

hard to

swallow. This magazine argued for him to decriminalise lockdown

rules,

to offer guidance and leave people to judge what is �right� � as was >>> being done with much success in Sweden and several states of

America.

But Johnson refused to do so, preferring to turn Britain into a

police

state. While having every intention of flouting the laws when he
considered it opportune to do so.

How ironic that in the November 2020 photograph of Boris Johnson

raising

a toast to the spin doctor he had forced to resign, a copy of The
Spectator can be seen resting on the table. This magazine had argued >>> against that month�s lockdown and its needless criminalisation of
everyday life. By then, the logic for lockdowns had collapsed. But,
thanks in part to a supine opposition, No. 10 pressed ahead anyway.
Those leaving drinks took place when all other social gatherings had >>> been banned under pain of huge fines.

Lockdowns involved the passing of the most damaging, illiberal

laws in

British postwar history. The social and economic cost is still being >>> counted. Johnson is guilty not simply of breaking his own rules,

but of

failing to assess if those rules even worked. The sheer scale of

the law

demanded a rigorous assessment of the policies behind it, but no

serious

cost-benefit analysis was conducted. Nor were studies

commissioned to

ask why infections seemed to have peaked before the previous

lockdown.

And no one is now asking why, if lockdown was the only means of

holding

back a Covid wave, Sweden has done so well without ever imposing

one.

The Prime Minister has not been �vindicated� as he claims. No one

who

spent months trying to abide by his lockdown laws is under any

doubt of

what went on. He is guilty of presiding over a gung-ho culture in

which

lockdown advocates were never properly challenged. He allowed

himself to

be bounced into taking deeply damaging decisions. His own

instinct to

resist lockdown was not enough: he could have assembled �red-team�
advisers to challenge Sage. He could have asked the Treasury for a
cost-benefit analysis of lockdown. He could have made the second
lockdown a matter of guidance, not of law. Instead he closed society >>> down over and over again, asking his aides to implement laws they
themselves regularly flouted.

Johnson has further opened himself to charges of hypocrisy

through his

confected fury about his former spokeswoman Allegra Stratton, who
resigned after being caught on camera making light of the parties

that

were being held in No. 10. There is no suggestion that she broke any >>> rules. She was poking fun at the absurdity of the law and of

being asked

to defend such a ridiculous situation.

Her laughter, Johnson declared, had caused national anger � an anger >>> that he said he shared. He was shocked � shocked! � to find any such >>> behaviour was happening in No. 10. Stratton resigned on

principle, the

only person in No. 10 to have done so.

It is a damning � and accurate � charge against the Prime

Minister that

he is no man of principle. Weakness in personal conduct need not
necessarily make a bad prime minister � Johnson�s hero Winston

Churchill

drank to excess for most of the second world war. The important

part of

leadership is getting the big decisions right. Johnson is often

said to

be a leader who manages to do just that � and certainly on

Ukraine that

claim can reasonably be made. But on Covid and lockdowns (and,

recently,

tax rises) he got some big decisions very wrong. His predicament

over

partygate is testament to that.

His failure to be guided by his instinctive liberalism has led

him to

the worst and most avoidable disasters of his premiership. He can

still

learn from these mistakes. But we are more than halfway through this >>> parliament: he does not have much time left.

The only *healthy* way to stop the pandemic, thereby saving lives, in
the U.K. & elsewhere is by rapidly (

http://bit.ly/RapidTestCOVID-19 )

finding out at any given moment, including even while on-line, who
among us are unwittingly contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or
asymptomatic) in order to http://tinyurl.com/ConvinceItForward (John
15:12) for them to call their doctor and self-quarantine per their
doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic. Thus, we're hoping for the
best while preparing for the worse-case scenario of the Alpha lineage
mutations and others like the Omicron, Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota,
Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations combining via
slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like
http://tinyurl.com/Deltamicron that may render current COVID
vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no longer effective.

Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.

So how are you ?

I am wonderfully hungry!

Source: https://groups.google.com/g/alt.bible.prophecy/c/n0MJtTUSf6k/m/9s4VpEk3AgAJ

Shorter link:
https://tinyurl.com/Negative053022

Thank you for noting that I have no COVID.

Laus DEO (Psalm 112:1)

Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
diabetics and other heart disease patients:

http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrew touts hunger (Luke 6:21a) with all glory
( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD, Who causes us to hunger
(Deuteronomy 8:3) when He blesses us right now (Luke 6:21a) thereby
removing the http://tinyurl.com/HeartVAT from around the heart

...because we mindfully choose to openly care with our heart,

HeartDoc Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist with an http://bit.ly/EternalMedicalLicense
2024 & upwards non-partisan candidate for U.S. President: http://WonderfullyHungry.org
and author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://bit.ly/HeartDocAndrewCare
which is the only **healthy** cure for the U.S. healthcare crisis

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc

On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 9:25:09 AM UTC-7, HeartDoc Andrew wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/wh4q9k/covid_mum_urges_vaccination_takeup_after_baby_loss/

By Gill Dummigan
Health Correspondent, BBC North West

Published
1 day ago

Share

Media caption,
Toni Dennan said though she had since had another daughter,

remembering

what happened "doesn't get any easier"

A mother who lost her baby after getting Covid-19 while she was

pregnant

has urged other pregnant women to get vaccinated.

Toni Dennan lost baby Darcey at the end of 2020, before the

vaccine was

available.

She and husband Lee wanted to share their story so that Darcey's

legacy

would be to save other babies.

Near the start of the pandemic, the couple found out they were

having a

baby.

Toni said it was "amazing".

"It was something we were obviously really happy about and really
wanted, so we were delighted."


A 20-week scan revealed they were having a girl.

"We knew we were calling her Darcey all the way through from that

moment

on, which we're grateful for now," Lee said.

Lee and Toni Dennan
Image caption,
Covid rules meant Lee had not been allowed to go to hospital with

Toni,

but he was called and told to get straight there
At the time, no vaccines were available, so Toni spent months

shielding.

But shortly before Christmas, she caught coronavirus and she became
concerned about Darcey.

An initial hospital check seemed to be OK, but by the next day,

she was

worse.

"She wasn't moving," she said.

"So I went back in and at that point it was a full-on emergency and
straight through to an emergency C-section."

Covid in pregnancy linked to birth-related complications
Pregnant women urged not to delay getting jab
Pregnant women 'afterthought' in Covid jab rollout
Covid restrictions meant Lee had not been allowed to go to

hospital with

her, but she said he was called by the medical staff and told to get
there as quickly as possible.

Toni was put under general anaesthetic and the hospital's medics

fought

to save her and Darcey.

"I came round and I was surrounded," she said.

"I was out of the theatre then, in a side room, and surrounded by

doctors.

"That was when the doctor had told me that Darcey hadn't made it.

"Lee walked through the door and kind of looked really hopeful and I
just shook my head at him."

She said remembering that moment "doesn't get any easier".

Dr Anustha Sivananthan
Image caption,
Dr Anustha Sivananthan said unvaccinated mums-to-be accounted for

"one

in five people in intensive care units"
Toni did not have the option of getting vaccinated, something

which is

now seen as essential to protect both mother and baby.

However, in some parts of North-West England, 60% of expectant

mothers

do not have that protection, so mobile clinics are being used to

try to

make it easier for them to have a jab.

Dr Anustha Sivananthan, medical director at Cheshire and Wirral
Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, said "one in five people in

intensive

care units are women who are pregnant who haven't been vaccinated".

"It's as high as that, which is why we're encouraging as many

pregnant

women or even women wanting to become pregnant to come forward

and have

their vaccination."

Nancy and Toni Dennan
Image caption,
The couple have since had another daughter, Nancy, but want Darcey's
legacy to be one of helping other people
Seven months ago, Toni and Lee had another daughter, Nancy.

Lee said it was "amazing just hearing her cry and seeing her for the
first time".

Toni added that she had "never been so happy to hear a baby cry".

"We know what you can lose and it's just not worth the risk, so I

would

urge every pregnant woman to get that vaccine."

The only *healthy* way to stop the pandemic, thereby saving lives, in
the U.K. & elsewhere is by rapidly ( http://bit.ly/RapidTestCOVID-19
) finding out at any given moment, including even while on-line, who
among us are unwittingly contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or
asymptomatic) in order to http://tinyurl.com/ConvinceItForward (John
15:12) for them to call their doctor and self-quarantine per their
doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic. Thus, we're hoping for the
best while preparing for the worse-case scenario of the Alpha lineage
mutations and others like the Omicron, Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota,
Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations combining via
slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like
http://tinyurl.com/Deltamicron that may render current COVID
vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no longer effective.

Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.

So how are you ?

I am wonderfully hungry!

Source:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.bible.prophecy/c/CDefovI2JtY/m/QFR4c07nAwAJ

Positive control on USENET:

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/7ixdk7t6Bk8/m/xpbS2z7QAAAJ

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as circling eagles don't have COVID) and
pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6) Father in
Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy Spirit
(Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways including especially caring to http://tinyurl.com/ConvinceItForward (John 15:12
as shown by http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest ) with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

Suggested further reading:

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/5EWtT4CwCOg/m/QjNF57xRBAAJ

Shorter link:
http://bit.ly/StatCOVID-19Test

Thank you for noting that I have no COVID.


Michael

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, uk.politics.misc

On Monday, August 15, 2022 at 11:00:47 PM UTC-7, disc...@T3WiJ.com wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

Michael Ejercito wrote:

https://archive.ph/fZdtJ


New CDC COVID-19 Guidance Is Agency ‘Admitting It Was Wrong’:

Epidemiologist

By Zachary Stieber and Jan Jekielek August 13, 2022 Updated:

August 13,

2022?bigger?smaller ?Print

0:00
0:00



1

The new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) COVID-19
guidance is the agency acknowledging it was wrong in the past to
downplay natural immunity and promote unprecedented policies like
asymptomatic testing, a California epidemiologist says.
The new guidance, released on Aug. 11, rescinds and alters a

number of

key recommendations, including treating unvaccinated and vaccinated
people differently for many purposes, explicitly stating that people
with previous infection have protection against severe illness, and
removing six-foot social distancing advice.
“The CDC is admitting it was wrong here, although they won’t put

it in

those words,” Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor of medicine at

Stanford

University School of Medicine, told The Epoch Times.
“What they’ll say is that, well, ‘the population is more

immunized now,

has more natural immunity now, and now is the time—the science has
changed.'”
But a large percentage of the U.S. population has had natural

immunity,

or protection from prior infection, Bhattacharya noted, while

over 80

percent of the elderly population had protection from severe disease >>>from COVID-19 vaccines, previous infection, or both, since 2021.
“This is two years too late, but it’s a good step,” Bhattacharya

added.

CDC Statement
The CDC, which did not respond to a request for comment,

portrayed the

change as streamlining previous guidance, with the adjustments

stemming

from more people being vaccinated and more COVID-19 treatments

available.

“We’re in a stronger place today as a nation, with more tools—like >>> vaccination, boosters, and treatments—to protect ourselves, and our >>> communities, from severe illness from COVID-19,” Greta Massetti,

the CDC

author of the new guidance, said in a statement. “We also have a

better

understanding of how to protect people from being exposed to the

virus,

like wearing high-quality masks, testing, and improved

ventilation. This

guidance acknowledges that the pandemic is not over, but also

helps us

move to a point where COVID-19 no longer severely disrupts our

daily lives.”

Dr. Jerome Adams, the surgeon general during the Trump

administration,

echoed the line of thinking.
“The fact that @CDCgov is changing guidance shouldn’t be taken as

proof

that they were necessarily ‘wrong,’ on a particular issue. The

virus has

changed, our tools and immunity have changed, and our knowledge has
changed. So too must our guidance. That’s how science works,” Adams >>> wrote on Twitter.
Vaccination numbers have fallen off in recent months, with little

change

among adults and little update among children, even after the

vaccines

were authorized and recommended for kids as young as 6 months old.
No new treatments have been authorized since December 2021, and a

number

of the treatments have been shown as less effective against newer
strains of the virus that causes COVID-19, as have the vaccines

and, in

some cases, natural immunity.
Nearly half of the 20 papers and briefs cited by the CDC in

support of

the adjusted guidance were published in 2020 or 2021, while a

number of

others were released in early 2022.
No Mandates Rescinded Yet
Among the most significant changes in the guidance: a rollback of
recommendations for asymptomatic testing for individuals exposed to
COVID-19, loosening guidance related to tracing contacts of COVID-19
cases, and ending quarantine recommendations for people exposed to a
positive case.
Some rules are stricter for high-risk settings such as nursing

homes.

Masking is also recommended for 10 days for people who were

exposed to

COVID-19, including when a person is at home around others.
Bhattacharya, who co-authored the Great Barrington Declaration in

2020,

a document that called for focused protection on the elderly and

fewer

restrictions on others, said that the guidance is closely aligned

with

the principles outlined in the declaration.
Based on the new guidance, the CDC should immediately rescind the
COVID-19 vaccine mandate for foreign travelers entering The United
States, a policy imposed in November 2021, the professor added.
The CDC’s webpage describing the mandate says that the agency “is >>> reviewing this page to align with updated guidance.” The U.S.

government

has not adjusted or rescinded any of its vaccine mandates since the
guidance was changed.

The only *healthy* way to stop the pandemic, thereby saving lives, in
the U.S. & elsewhere is by rapidly ( http://bit.ly/RapidTestCOVID-19
) finding out at any given moment, including even while on-line, who
among us are unwittingly contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or
asymptomatic) in order to http://tinyurl.com/ConvinceItForward (John
15:12) for them to call their doctor and self-quarantine per their
doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic. Thus, we're hoping for the
best while preparing for the worse-case scenario of the Alpha lineage
mutations and others like the Omicron, Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota,
Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations combining via
slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like
http://tinyurl.com/Deltamicron that may render current COVID
vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no longer effective.

Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.

So how are you ?

I am wonderfully hungry!

Source:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.bible.prophecy/c/4Pnh9xiW7jQ/m/KuDJgyTgAQAJ

Positive control on USENET:

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/7ixdk7t6Bk8/m/xpbS2z7QAAAJ

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as circling eagles don't have COVID) and
pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6) Father in
Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy Spirit
(Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways including especially caring to http://tinyurl.com/ConvinceItForward (John 15:12
as shown by http://tinyurl.com/RapidOmicronTest ) with all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

Suggested further reading:

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/5EWtT4CwCOg/m/QjNF57xRBAAJ

Shorter link:
http://bit.ly/StatCOVID-19Test

Thank you for noting that I have no COVID.


Michael

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)