https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/05/unethical-quote-of-the-week-the-columbia-law-review/
Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review
MAY 5, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
I gave a legal ethics seminar 90 minutes after finding my wife dead, and >these infants are too traumatized to take their exams because of a
horrific time on campus and their level of distress:
They dont know the meaning of the word professionalism (my seminar
topic), and until they learn it and understand their duty to practice it
as lawyers, these students, supposedly the best of Columbias best, are
not fit to practice law.
Jonathan Turley didnt mince words, and he has be a master word-mincer, >regarding this weenie-ism, writing, Outside of the Columbia Law Review >offices is a thing called life. It is neither predictable nor
comfortable. We enter the lives of our clients when they are often
failing apart. We have to bring our skills and support at those moments >without the assistance of a trauma tent or emotional coach. We also
cannot ask judges for postponements to allow us to process the stress of
the moment. He continued, [O]ur clients look to us for strength not >fragility in such moments. The response from Columbia Law School should
be simple: see you at the exams.
Bingo. Meanwhile, the ethics dunces at the Ethics Alarms Unethical
Website of the Century, Above the Law, reacted with its usual almost >infallible ability to get every issue wrong while deriding the more
competent analysts who got it right, writing, As predictable as night >follows day, right-wing troll outlets are already mocking Columbia law >students for talking about violence and being irrevocably shaken.
But beyond the smug posturing, theres not so much a substantive counter
to the arguments laid out in the letter.
Whatever language that last sentence is supposed to be in
Sure theres a substantive counter; Turley made it. Outside of the
Columbia Law Review offices is a thing called life.
ReplyPermalinkOn Sun, 5 May 2024 23:05:34 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoMangina, there is nothing coon about Jack Marshall!
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/05/unethical-quote-of-the-week-the-columbia-
law-review/LOL! A coon writing about ethics???? Whatever NEXT?
Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review
MAY 5, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
Michael Ejercito wrote:You got that right!
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/05/unethical-quote-of-the-week-the-columbia-law-review/
Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review
MAY 5, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
I gave a legal ethics seminar 90 minutes after finding my wife dead, and
these infants are too traumatized to take their exams because of a
“horrific time on campus” and their “level of distress”:
They don’t know the meaning of the word “professionalism” (my seminar >> topic), and until they learn it and understand their duty to practice it
as lawyers, these students, supposedly the best of Columbia’s best, are
not fit to practice law.
Jonathan Turley didn’t mince words, and he has be a master word-mincer,
regarding this weenie-ism, writing, “Outside of the Columbia Law Review
offices is a thing called life. It is neither predictable nor
comfortable. We enter the lives of our clients when they are often
failing apart. We have to bring our skills and support at those moments
without the assistance of a trauma tent or emotional coach. We also
cannot ask judges for postponements to allow us to process the stress of
the moment.” He continued, “[O]ur clients look to us for strength not
fragility in such moments. The response from Columbia Law School should
be simple: see you at the exams.”
Bingo. Meanwhile, the ethics dunces at the Ethics Alarms Unethical
Website of the Century, Above the Law, reacted with its usual almost
infallible ability to get every issue wrong while deriding the more
competent analysts who got it right, writing, “As predictable as night
follows day, right-wing troll outlets are already mocking Columbia law
students for talking about “violence” and being “irrevocably shaken.”
But beyond the smug posturing, there’s not so much a substantive counter >> to the arguments laid out in the letter.”
Whatever language that last sentence is supposed to be in…
Sure there’s a substantive counter; Turley made it. “Outside of the
Columbia Law Review offices is a thing called life.”
And He Who is the life (John 14:6) is also the Prince of Peace (Isaiah
9:6) so that in Him, we have perfect (Matt 5:48) peace (Galatians
5:22-23).
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/05/unethical-quote-of-the-week-the-columbia-law-review/
Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review
MAY 5, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
I gave a legal ethics seminar 90 minutes after finding my wife dead, and >>> these infants are too traumatized to take their exams because of a
horrific time on campus and their level of distress:
They dont know the meaning of the word professionalism (my seminar
topic), and until they learn it and understand their duty to practice it >>> as lawyers, these students, supposedly the best of Columbias best, are
not fit to practice law.
Jonathan Turley didnt mince words, and he has be a master word-mincer,
regarding this weenie-ism, writing, Outside of the Columbia Law Review
offices is a thing called life. It is neither predictable nor
comfortable. We enter the lives of our clients when they are often
failing apart. We have to bring our skills and support at those moments
without the assistance of a trauma tent or emotional coach. We also
cannot ask judges for postponements to allow us to process the stress of >>> the moment. He continued, [O]ur clients look to us for strength not
fragility in such moments. The response from Columbia Law School should
be simple: see you at the exams.
Bingo. Meanwhile, the ethics dunces at the Ethics Alarms Unethical
Website of the Century, Above the Law, reacted with its usual almost
infallible ability to get every issue wrong while deriding the more
competent analysts who got it right, writing, As predictable as night
follows day, right-wing troll outlets are already mocking Columbia law
students for talking about violence and being irrevocably shaken.
But beyond the smug posturing, theres not so much a substantive counter >>> to the arguments laid out in the letter.
Whatever language that last sentence is supposed to be in
Sure theres a substantive counter; Turley made it. Outside of the
Columbia Law Review offices is a thing called life.
And He Who is the life (John 14:6) is also the Prince of Peace (Isaiah
9:6) so that in Him, we have perfect (Matt 5:48) peace (Galatians
5:22-23).
You got that right!
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!
someone eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned by GOD whined:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!
LIE.
Michael Ejercito wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/05/unethical-quote-of-the-week-the-columbia-law-review/
Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review
MAY 5, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
I gave a legal ethics seminar 90 minutes after finding my wife dead, and >>>> these infants are too traumatized to take their exams because of a
“horrific time on campus” and their “level of distress”:
They don’t know the meaning of the word “professionalism” (my seminar
topic), and until they learn it and understand their duty to practice it >>>> as lawyers, these students, supposedly the best of Columbia’s best, are >>>> not fit to practice law.
Jonathan Turley didn’t mince words, and he has be a master word-mincer, >>>> regarding this weenie-ism, writing, “Outside of the Columbia Law Review >>>> offices is a thing called life. It is neither predictable nor
comfortable. We enter the lives of our clients when they are often
failing apart. We have to bring our skills and support at those moments >>>> without the assistance of a trauma tent or emotional coach. We also
cannot ask judges for postponements to allow us to process the stress of >>>> the moment.” He continued, “[O]ur clients look to us for strength not >>>> fragility in such moments. The response from Columbia Law School should >>>> be simple: see you at the exams.”
Bingo. Meanwhile, the ethics dunces at the Ethics Alarms Unethical
Website of the Century, Above the Law, reacted with its usual almost
infallible ability to get every issue wrong while deriding the more
competent analysts who got it right, writing, “As predictable as night >>>> follows day, right-wing troll outlets are already mocking Columbia law >>>> students for talking about “violence” and being “irrevocably shaken.”
But beyond the smug posturing, there’s not so much a substantive counter >>>> to the arguments laid out in the letter.”
Whatever language that last sentence is supposed to be in…
Sure there’s a substantive counter; Turley made it. “Outside of the >>>> Columbia Law Review offices is a thing called life.”
And He Who is the life (John 14:6) is also the Prince of Peace (Isaiah
9:6) so that in Him, we have perfect (Matt 5:48) peace (Galatians
5:22-23).
You got that right!
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!
While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO !
On Mon, 6 May 2024 06:51:56 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoNithing, there is nothing coon about Jack nor Chris.
Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'Needledick, he IS a coon....just like Chrissie Morton. And just as
SHEIN32 minutes ago
LOL! A coon writing about ethics???? Whatever NEXT?Mangina, there is nothing coon about Jack Marshall!
EXEMPT from ethics as YOU.
That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.You are a Nazi.You are a gook.
Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface' SHEINa day agoYou kicked no one.
ReplyPermalinkOn Mon, 6 May 2024 19:19:58 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
...
Needledick, they are BOTH coons. Black as the Ace of Spades!
Post by Michael Ejercito
And I will always remember how Chris dominated you and humiliated you!
And I will always remembter kicking Chrissie Morton off Usenet. His
flatnosed coon face hasn't been seen here for over 20 YEARS!
The following article explains your pathology.That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.How the fuck CAN it be, gook? I'm WHITE and you're an Asiatic
shitskin!
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 302 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 120:56:15 |
Calls: | 6,769 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 12,299 |
Messages: | 5,376,773 |
Posted today: | 2 |