• Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review

    From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 5 23:05:34 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
    XPost: uk.legal

    https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/05/unethical-quote-of-the-week-the-columbia-law-review/


    Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review
    MAY 5, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL


    I gave a legal ethics seminar 90 minutes after finding my wife dead, and
    these infants are too traumatized to take their exams because of a
    “horrific time on campus” and their “level of distress”:


    They don’t know the meaning of the word “professionalism” (my seminar topic), and until they learn it and understand their duty to practice it
    as lawyers, these students, supposedly the best of Columbia’s best, are
    not fit to practice law.

    Jonathan Turley didn’t mince words, and he has be a master word-mincer, regarding this weenie-ism, writing, “Outside of the Columbia Law Review offices is a thing called life. It is neither predictable nor
    comfortable. We enter the lives of our clients when they are often
    failing apart. We have to bring our skills and support at those moments
    without the assistance of a trauma tent or emotional coach. We also
    cannot ask judges for postponements to allow us to process the stress of
    the moment.” He continued, “[O]ur clients look to us for strength not fragility in such moments. The response from Columbia Law School should
    be simple: see you at the exams.”

    Bingo. Meanwhile, the ethics dunces at the Ethics Alarms Unethical
    Website of the Century, Above the Law, reacted with its usual almost
    infallible ability to get every issue wrong while deriding the more
    competent analysts who got it right, writing, “As predictable as night follows day, right-wing troll outlets are already mocking Columbia law
    students for talking about “violence” and being “irrevocably shaken.” But beyond the smug posturing, there’s not so much a substantive counter
    to the arguments laid out in the letter.”

    Whatever language that last sentence is supposed to be in…

    Sure there’s a substantive counter; Turley made it. “Outside of the Columbia Law Review offices is a thing called life.”

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HeartDoc Andrew@21:1/5 to Michael Ejercito on Mon May 6 03:45:34 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
    XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

    Michael Ejercito wrote:

    https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/05/unethical-quote-of-the-week-the-columbia-law-review/


    Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review
    MAY 5, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL


    I gave a legal ethics seminar 90 minutes after finding my wife dead, and >these infants are too traumatized to take their exams because of a
    horrific time on campus and their level of distress:


    They dont know the meaning of the word professionalism (my seminar
    topic), and until they learn it and understand their duty to practice it
    as lawyers, these students, supposedly the best of Columbias best, are
    not fit to practice law.

    Jonathan Turley didnt mince words, and he has be a master word-mincer, >regarding this weenie-ism, writing, Outside of the Columbia Law Review >offices is a thing called life. It is neither predictable nor
    comfortable. We enter the lives of our clients when they are often
    failing apart. We have to bring our skills and support at those moments >without the assistance of a trauma tent or emotional coach. We also
    cannot ask judges for postponements to allow us to process the stress of
    the moment. He continued, [O]ur clients look to us for strength not >fragility in such moments. The response from Columbia Law School should
    be simple: see you at the exams.

    Bingo. Meanwhile, the ethics dunces at the Ethics Alarms Unethical
    Website of the Century, Above the Law, reacted with its usual almost >infallible ability to get every issue wrong while deriding the more
    competent analysts who got it right, writing, As predictable as night >follows day, right-wing troll outlets are already mocking Columbia law >students for talking about violence and being irrevocably shaken.
    But beyond the smug posturing, theres not so much a substantive counter
    to the arguments laid out in the letter.

    Whatever language that last sentence is supposed to be in

    Sure theres a substantive counter; Turley made it. Outside of the
    Columbia Law Review offices is a thing called life.

    And He Who is the life (John 14:6) is also the Prince of Peace (Isaiah
    9:6) so that in Him, we have perfect (Matt 5:48) peace (Galatians
    5:22-23).

    Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
    hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
    appetite for food right now too.

    So how are you ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HeartDoc Andrew@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 6 03:47:17 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
    XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

    (Peace) 05/06/24 Again not a LoosePeeledQuackIdiot bigot ...

    https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/Ai33hw5PINI/m/wytVpY68MwAJ

    Instead be "woke" to the sin of racial prejudice:

    https://tinyurl.com/JesusIsWoke (i.e. not a Nazi bigot) *and* risen!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 6 06:51:56 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
    XPost: uk.legal

    Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'
    SHEIN32 minutes ago
    ReplyPermalinkOn Sun, 5 May 2024 23:05:34 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
    https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/05/unethical-quote-of-the-week-the-columbia-

    law-review/
    Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review
    MAY 5, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
    LOL! A coon writing about ethics???? Whatever NEXT?
    Mangina, there is nothing coon about Jack Marshall!


    You are a Nazi.

    As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

    You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know you
    can not measure up.

    You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
    betters.

    You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
    tell it.

    You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
    out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of National Socialism.

    Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
    Freedom of choice terrifies you… which is why you choose minor children
    as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent adults in a consensually sexual way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a
    helpless victim, be it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a mental
    hospital.

    That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or honest
    about it.


    Michael

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to HeartDoc Andrew on Mon May 6 06:50:02 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
    XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

    HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
    Michael Ejercito wrote:

    https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/05/unethical-quote-of-the-week-the-columbia-law-review/


    Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review
    MAY 5, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL


    I gave a legal ethics seminar 90 minutes after finding my wife dead, and
    these infants are too traumatized to take their exams because of a
    “horrific time on campus” and their “level of distress”:


    They don’t know the meaning of the word “professionalism” (my seminar >> topic), and until they learn it and understand their duty to practice it
    as lawyers, these students, supposedly the best of Columbia’s best, are
    not fit to practice law.

    Jonathan Turley didn’t mince words, and he has be a master word-mincer,
    regarding this weenie-ism, writing, “Outside of the Columbia Law Review
    offices is a thing called life. It is neither predictable nor
    comfortable. We enter the lives of our clients when they are often
    failing apart. We have to bring our skills and support at those moments
    without the assistance of a trauma tent or emotional coach. We also
    cannot ask judges for postponements to allow us to process the stress of
    the moment.” He continued, “[O]ur clients look to us for strength not
    fragility in such moments. The response from Columbia Law School should
    be simple: see you at the exams.”

    Bingo. Meanwhile, the ethics dunces at the Ethics Alarms Unethical
    Website of the Century, Above the Law, reacted with its usual almost
    infallible ability to get every issue wrong while deriding the more
    competent analysts who got it right, writing, “As predictable as night
    follows day, right-wing troll outlets are already mocking Columbia law
    students for talking about “violence” and being “irrevocably shaken.”
    But beyond the smug posturing, there’s not so much a substantive counter >> to the arguments laid out in the letter.”

    Whatever language that last sentence is supposed to be in…

    Sure there’s a substantive counter; Turley made it. “Outside of the
    Columbia Law Review offices is a thing called life.”

    And He Who is the life (John 14:6) is also the Prince of Peace (Isaiah
    9:6) so that in Him, we have perfect (Matt 5:48) peace (Galatians
    5:22-23).
    You got that right!


    Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
    hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
    appetite for food right now too.

    So how are you ?

    I am wonderfully hungry!


    Michael

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HeartDoc Andrew@21:1/5 to Michael Ejercito on Mon May 6 12:03:16 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
    XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

    Michael Ejercito wrote:
    HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
    Michael Ejercito wrote:

    https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/05/unethical-quote-of-the-week-the-columbia-law-review/


    Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review
    MAY 5, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL


    I gave a legal ethics seminar 90 minutes after finding my wife dead, and >>> these infants are too traumatized to take their exams because of a
    horrific time on campus and their level of distress:


    They dont know the meaning of the word professionalism (my seminar
    topic), and until they learn it and understand their duty to practice it >>> as lawyers, these students, supposedly the best of Columbias best, are
    not fit to practice law.

    Jonathan Turley didnt mince words, and he has be a master word-mincer,
    regarding this weenie-ism, writing, Outside of the Columbia Law Review
    offices is a thing called life. It is neither predictable nor
    comfortable. We enter the lives of our clients when they are often
    failing apart. We have to bring our skills and support at those moments
    without the assistance of a trauma tent or emotional coach. We also
    cannot ask judges for postponements to allow us to process the stress of >>> the moment. He continued, [O]ur clients look to us for strength not
    fragility in such moments. The response from Columbia Law School should
    be simple: see you at the exams.

    Bingo. Meanwhile, the ethics dunces at the Ethics Alarms Unethical
    Website of the Century, Above the Law, reacted with its usual almost
    infallible ability to get every issue wrong while deriding the more
    competent analysts who got it right, writing, As predictable as night
    follows day, right-wing troll outlets are already mocking Columbia law
    students for talking about violence and being irrevocably shaken.
    But beyond the smug posturing, theres not so much a substantive counter >>> to the arguments laid out in the letter.

    Whatever language that last sentence is supposed to be in

    Sure theres a substantive counter; Turley made it. Outside of the
    Columbia Law Review offices is a thing called life.

    And He Who is the life (John 14:6) is also the Prince of Peace (Isaiah
    9:6) so that in Him, we have perfect (Matt 5:48) peace (Galatians
    5:22-23).

    You got that right!


    Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
    hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
    appetite for food right now too.

    So how are you ?

    I am wonderfully hungry!

    While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
    8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
    17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
    COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
    Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
    Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
    always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
    including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
    all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
    the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

    Laus DEO !

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HeartDoc Andrew@21:1/5 to Michael Ejercito on Mon May 6 12:21:34 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
    XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

    Michael Ejercito wrote:
    someone eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned by GOD whined:
    Michael Ejercito wrote:
    HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

    Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
    hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
    appetite for food right now too.

    So how are you ?

    I am wonderfully hungry!

    Source:
    https://narkive.com/GCjXe8Za.4

    LIE.

    To write that the Holy Spirit, Who is the Spirit of truth, helps us
    lie is to again blaspheme (Mark 3:29) against Him.

    When we say/write that we're wonderfully hungry, we are speaking "the
    truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth" with GOD's Help,
    Who is the Holy Spirit, Who is the Spirit of truth, because it is
    written that GOD says HE is "I am" (Exodus 3:14) and that we are
    "wonderfully made" (Psalm 139:14) by GOD, Who did eat the piece of
    broiled fish ( https://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) to prove that He is living as
    our #1 Example of living http://WonderfullyHungry.org as we are
    blessed right now (Luke 6:21a) by the truth (John 14:6).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to HeartDoc Andrew on Mon May 6 19:15:07 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
    XPost: uk.legal, alt.christnet.christianlife

    HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
    Michael Ejercito wrote:
    HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
    Michael Ejercito wrote:

    https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/05/unethical-quote-of-the-week-the-columbia-law-review/


    Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review
    MAY 5, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL


    I gave a legal ethics seminar 90 minutes after finding my wife dead, and >>>> these infants are too traumatized to take their exams because of a
    “horrific time on campus” and their “level of distress”:


    They don’t know the meaning of the word “professionalism” (my seminar
    topic), and until they learn it and understand their duty to practice it >>>> as lawyers, these students, supposedly the best of Columbia’s best, are >>>> not fit to practice law.

    Jonathan Turley didn’t mince words, and he has be a master word-mincer, >>>> regarding this weenie-ism, writing, “Outside of the Columbia Law Review >>>> offices is a thing called life. It is neither predictable nor
    comfortable. We enter the lives of our clients when they are often
    failing apart. We have to bring our skills and support at those moments >>>> without the assistance of a trauma tent or emotional coach. We also
    cannot ask judges for postponements to allow us to process the stress of >>>> the moment.” He continued, “[O]ur clients look to us for strength not >>>> fragility in such moments. The response from Columbia Law School should >>>> be simple: see you at the exams.”

    Bingo. Meanwhile, the ethics dunces at the Ethics Alarms Unethical
    Website of the Century, Above the Law, reacted with its usual almost
    infallible ability to get every issue wrong while deriding the more
    competent analysts who got it right, writing, “As predictable as night >>>> follows day, right-wing troll outlets are already mocking Columbia law >>>> students for talking about “violence” and being “irrevocably shaken.”
    But beyond the smug posturing, there’s not so much a substantive counter >>>> to the arguments laid out in the letter.”

    Whatever language that last sentence is supposed to be in…

    Sure there’s a substantive counter; Turley made it. “Outside of the >>>> Columbia Law Review offices is a thing called life.”

    And He Who is the life (John 14:6) is also the Prince of Peace (Isaiah
    9:6) so that in Him, we have perfect (Matt 5:48) peace (Galatians
    5:22-23).

    You got that right!


    Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
    hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
    appetite for food right now too.

    So how are you ?

    I am wonderfully hungry!

    While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
    8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
    17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
    COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
    Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
    Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
    always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
    including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
    all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
    the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

    Laus DEO !

    Thank you for noting that I have no COVID.


    Michael

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 6 19:19:58 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
    XPost: uk.legal

    Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface' SHEINabout 11 hours ago
    On Mon, 6 May 2024 06:51:56 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
    Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'
    SHEIN32 minutes ago
    LOL! A coon writing about ethics???? Whatever NEXT?
    Mangina, there is nothing coon about Jack Marshall!
    Needledick, he IS a coon....just like Chrissie Morton. And just as
    EXEMPT from ethics as YOU.
    Nithing, there is nothing coon about Jack nor Chris.

    And I will always remember how Chris dominated you and humiliated you!
    You are a Nazi.
    You are a gook.
    That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

    You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
    key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
    rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

    Bill explains what nithings are.

    http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

    Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

    by Bill Levinson
    It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
    knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
    person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
    psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
    that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
    argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence against civilians as “resistance.”

    We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
    humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
    worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
    English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
    describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
    word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
    nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity. Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
    term of utmost opprobrium.”

    We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
    supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
    Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
    come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
    dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
    beings.
    nithings

    Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
    become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
    recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,

    The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
    earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
    obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
    known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
    was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
    retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
    back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
    cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.

    A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
    enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
    supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
    degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
    tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
    is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
    carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
    and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
    nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
    Humanity.

    The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
    outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
    for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
    German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
    kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
    but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
    kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”

    The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
    complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
    transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
    sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
    Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
    “The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
    and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
    to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”

    "Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’ destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and “unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
    perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
    to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
    in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
    enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
    total antithesis of God the Creator.

    The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
    alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
    directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
    matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
    make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
    that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
    than any man can build.

    This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
    comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
    is possible.

    In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
    subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
    its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
    toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
    extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
    apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
    others to do likewise.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Ejercito@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 8 07:25:06 2024
    XPost: alt.bible.prophecy, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.israel
    XPost: uk.legal

    Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface' SHEINa day ago
    ReplyPermalinkOn Mon, 6 May 2024 19:19:58 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
    ...
    Needledick, they are BOTH coons. Black as the Ace of Spades!
    Post by Michael Ejercito
    And I will always remember how Chris dominated you and humiliated you!
    And I will always remembter kicking Chrissie Morton off Usenet. His
    flatnosed coon face hasn't been seen here for over 20 YEARS!
    You kicked no one.

    That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
    How the fuck CAN it be, gook? I'm WHITE and you're an Asiatic
    shitskin!
    The following article explains your pathology.




    http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/11/historys_oldest_hatred/


    History's oldest hatred
    By Jeff Jacoby
    Globe Columnist / March 11, 2009
    Email|Print|Single Page||Text size – +

    ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so
    it is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer "anti-Semitism" - a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
    Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
    Jew-hatred - is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never
    had anything to do with Semites or being Semitic.

    Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable as anti-Semitism.
    "The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan, religious, and secular societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis Prager in "Why the Jews?,"
    their classic study of anti-Semitism. "Fascists have accused them of
    being Communists, and Communists have branded them capitalists. Jews who
    live in non-Jewish societies have been accused of having dual loyalties,
    while Jews who live in the Jewish state have been condemned as
    'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied, and rich Jews are resented. Jews have
    been branded as both rootless cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews
    who assimilate have been called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay
    together spark hatred for remaining separate."

    There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
    Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
    week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
    read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
    Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
    Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
    empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the king:

    "There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among . . . all the provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
    other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
    benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it be
    written that they be destroyed."

    When the king agrees, Haman makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and
    destroy all the Jews, the young and the elderly, children and women, in
    one day . . . and to take their property for plunder."

    What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
    lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
    empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
    nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism - just as Jews in
    later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the Church
    or Islam, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and Soviet commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the president of
    Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state, when firebombs
    are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and Chicago, it is not
    because Jews deserve to be victimized.

    Many Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
    is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. They are the
    object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the haters'
    rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
    contradictory. What do those who vilify Jews as greedy bankers have in
    common with those who revile them as fiendish Bolsheviks? Nothing, save
    an irrational obsession with Jews.

    At one point, Haman lets the mask slip. He boasts to his friends and
    family of "the glory of his riches, and the great number of his sons,
    and everything in which the king had promoted him and elevated him."
    Still, he seethes with rage and frustration: "Yet all this is worthless
    to me so long as I see Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate."
    That is the unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend
    in, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting there -
    undigested, unassimilated, and therefore unbearable.

    Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did Hitler and Arafat, so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
    focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
    sometimes on his professional achievements. Under it all, however, it is
    the Jew's Jewishness that the anti-Semite cannot abide.

    With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their role
    in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures too,
    as obsessive and indestructible - and deadly - as ever.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)