https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/01/ethics-and-constitutional-dunces-the-320-house-members-mostly-republicans-who-voted-for-the-antisemitism-awareness-act/
Ethics and Constitutional Dunces: The 320 House Members (Mostly
Republicans) Who Voted for the Antisemitism Awareness Act
MAY 1, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
You know, or should, that your conduct is unethical and outrageous when
it makes Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fl.) look good by comparison Gaetz voted
against HR 690, as every member of the House should have since it is >throbbingly unconstitutional on its face, no question, no argument, a
flat out First Amendment violation. Gaetz told his followers on
Twitter/X that he voted against the proposed legislation because it is a >ridiculous hate speech bill.
Antisemitism is wrong, but this legislation is written without regard
for the Constitution, common sense, or even the common understanding of
the meaning of words, he wrote. Bingo. The bill, in weasel words
remarkable even by recent Congressional standards, declares that >anti-Semitism is a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), and embraces an expansive definition of
the term adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United
States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department
of State; and includes the [c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism >identified in the IHRA definition.
The IHRA definition includes examples of pure speech, and I would expect
any junior in high school to know that these cannot be criminalized:
Working definition of antisemitism :
Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as >hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of
antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or >their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious >facilities.
To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as
illustrations:
Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel,
conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar
to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as
antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to
harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for why things go
wrong. It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and >employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.
Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media,
schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into >account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the
name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical
allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective such
as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish
conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or
other societal institutions.
Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined >wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for
acts committed by non-Jews.
Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or
intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of
National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during
World War II (the Holocaust)
Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or >exaggerating the Holocaust.
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the
alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own >nations.
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by >claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor. >Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or >demanded of any other democratic nation.
Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., >claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or >Israelis.
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. >Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel. >Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for
example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic
materials in some countries).
I bolded the most obviously unconstitutional examples above that are
made illegal by the Antisemitism Awareness Act. Thats right: its
every one of them.
The GOP majority is using the legislative process for virtue-signalling
and grandstanding while showing disregard for individual rights and >Constitutional protections. Its an abuse of power and process, and
anyone who voted for this monstrosity who doesnt realize it defies the
Bill of Rights is too ignorant to be in Congress.
I was amused to see that Rep. Jackson Lee, among the most prominent >Dunning-Kruger sufferers in the House, was one of the Democrats
sponsoring the bill, along with Rep. Stefanik, who knows better and
should be ashamed of herself.
All 320 House members who voted yes should. They disgrace the
Legislative Branch.
Michael Ejercito wrote:You got that right!
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/01/ethics-and-constitutional-dunces-the-320-house-members-mostly-republicans-who-voted-for-the-antisemitism-awareness-act/
Ethics and Constitutional Dunces: The 320 House Members (Mostly
Republicans) Who Voted for the “Antisemitism Awareness Act”
MAY 1, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
You know, or should, that your conduct is unethical and outrageous when
it makes Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fl.) look good by comparison Gaetz voted
against HR 690, as every member of the House should have since it is
throbbingly unconstitutional on its face, no question, no argument, a
flat out First Amendment violation. Gaetz told his followers on
Twitter/X that he voted against the proposed legislation because it is a
“ridiculous hate speech bill.”
“Antisemitism is wrong, but this legislation is written without regard
for the Constitution, common sense, or even the common understanding of
the meaning of words,” he wrote. Bingo. The bill, in weasel words
remarkable even by recent Congressional standards, declares that
“anti-Semitism” is a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), and embraces an expansive definition of
the term “adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United
States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department
of State; and… includes the “[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism” >> identified in the IHRA definition.”
The IHRA definition includes examples of pure speech, and I would expect
any junior in high school to know that these cannot be criminalized:
Working definition of antisemitism :
“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as >> hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of
antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or
their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious
facilities.”
To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as
illustrations:
Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel,
conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar
to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as
antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to
harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go
wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and >> employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.
Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media,
schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into
account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the
name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical
allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such >> as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish
conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or
other societal institutions.
Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined
wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for
acts committed by non-Jews.
Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or
intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of
National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during
World War II (the Holocaust)
Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or
exaggerating the Holocaust.
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the
alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own
nations.
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by
claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or
demanded of any other democratic nation.
Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g.,
claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or
Israelis.
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for
example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic
materials in some countries).
I bolded the most obviously unconstitutional “examples” above that are >> made illegal by the “Antisemitism Awareness Act.” That’s right: it’s >> every one of them.
The GOP majority is using the legislative process for virtue-signalling
and grandstanding while showing disregard for individual rights and
Constitutional protections. It’s an abuse of power and process, and
anyone who voted for this monstrosity who doesn’t realize it defies the
Bill of Rights is too ignorant to be in Congress.
I was amused to see that Rep. Jackson Lee, among the most prominent
Dunning-Kruger sufferers in the House, was one of the Democrats
sponsoring the bill, along with Rep. Stefanik, who knows better and
should be ashamed of herself.
All 320 House members who voted “yes” should. They disgrace the
Legislative Branch.
The absolutely only godly way (John 14:6) to stop the terrible
misbehavior toward Jews is as shown at http://WonderfullyHungry.org
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/01/ethics-and-constitutional-dunces-the-320-house-members-mostly-republicans-who-voted-for-the-antisemitism-awareness-act/
Ethics and Constitutional Dunces: The 320 House Members (Mostly
Republicans) Who Voted for the Antisemitism Awareness Act
MAY 1, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
You know, or should, that your conduct is unethical and outrageous when
it makes Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fl.) look good by comparison Gaetz voted
against HR 690, as every member of the House should have since it is
throbbingly unconstitutional on its face, no question, no argument, a
flat out First Amendment violation. Gaetz told his followers on
Twitter/X that he voted against the proposed legislation because it is a >>> ridiculous hate speech bill.
Antisemitism is wrong, but this legislation is written without regard
for the Constitution, common sense, or even the common understanding of
the meaning of words, he wrote. Bingo. The bill, in weasel words
remarkable even by recent Congressional standards, declares that
anti-Semitism is a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), and embraces an expansive definition of
the term adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United
States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department
of State; and includes the [c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism
identified in the IHRA definition.
The IHRA definition includes examples of pure speech, and I would expect >>> any junior in high school to know that these cannot be criminalized:
Working definition of antisemitism :
Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as >>> hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of
antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or >>> their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious
facilities.
To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as
illustrations:
Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel,
conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar >>> to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as
antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to
harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for why things go
wrong. It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and >>> employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.
Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media,
schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into
account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the >>> name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical
allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective such >>> as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish
conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or
other societal institutions.
Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined
wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for
acts committed by non-Jews.
Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or
intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of
National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during
World War II (the Holocaust)
Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or
exaggerating the Holocaust.
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the
alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own >>> nations.
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by
claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or
demanded of any other democratic nation.
Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., >>> claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or
Israelis.
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. >>> Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel. >>> Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for
example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic
materials in some countries).
I bolded the most obviously unconstitutional examples above that are
made illegal by the Antisemitism Awareness Act. Thats right: its
every one of them.
The GOP majority is using the legislative process for virtue-signalling
and grandstanding while showing disregard for individual rights and
Constitutional protections. Its an abuse of power and process, and
anyone who voted for this monstrosity who doesnt realize it defies the
Bill of Rights is too ignorant to be in Congress.
I was amused to see that Rep. Jackson Lee, among the most prominent
Dunning-Kruger sufferers in the House, was one of the Democrats
sponsoring the bill, along with Rep. Stefanik, who knows better and
should be ashamed of herself.
All 320 House members who voted yes should. They disgrace the
Legislative Branch.
The absolutely only godly way (John 14:6) to stop the terrible
misbehavior toward Jews is as shown at http://WonderfullyHungry.org
You got that right!
Baruch HaShem.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!
ReplyPermalinkOn Thu, 2 May 2024 20:12:20 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoMangina, there is nothing obese about me.
<b'ris>
Post by HeartDoc AndrewLIE.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) andI am wonderfully hungry!
hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You are wonderfully obese, you fat Asiatic slug!
Michael Ejercito wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/01/ethics-and-constitutional-dunces-the-320-house-members-mostly-republicans-who-voted-for-the-antisemitism-awareness-act/
Ethics and Constitutional Dunces: The 320 House Members (Mostly
Republicans) Who Voted for the “Antisemitism Awareness Act”
MAY 1, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
You know, or should, that your conduct is unethical and outrageous when >>>> it makes Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fl.) look good by comparison Gaetz voted
against HR 690, as every member of the House should have since it is
throbbingly unconstitutional on its face, no question, no argument, a
flat out First Amendment violation. Gaetz told his followers on
Twitter/X that he voted against the proposed legislation because it is a >>>> “ridiculous hate speech bill.”
“Antisemitism is wrong, but this legislation is written without regard >>>> for the Constitution, common sense, or even the common understanding of >>>> the meaning of words,” he wrote. Bingo. The bill, in weasel words
remarkable even by recent Congressional standards, declares that
“anti-Semitism” is a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of >>>> 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), and embraces an expansive definition of >>>> the term “adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United
States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department >>>> of State; and… includes the “[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism”
identified in the IHRA definition.”
The IHRA definition includes examples of pure speech, and I would expect >>>> any junior in high school to know that these cannot be criminalized:
Working definition of antisemitism :
“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as >>>> hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of
antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or >>>> their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious
facilities.”
To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as
illustrations:
Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel,
conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar >>>> to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as
antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to
harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go >>>> wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and >>>> employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.
Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media,
schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into >>>> account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the >>>> name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical
allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such >>>> as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish
conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or
other societal institutions.
Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined
wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for
acts committed by non-Jews.
Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or
intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of
National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during
World War II (the Holocaust)
Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or
exaggerating the Holocaust.
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the
alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own >>>> nations.
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by
claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor. >>>> Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or >>>> demanded of any other democratic nation.
Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., >>>> claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or >>>> Israelis.
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. >>>> Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel. >>>> Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for
example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic
materials in some countries).
I bolded the most obviously unconstitutional “examples” above that are >>>> made illegal by the “Antisemitism Awareness Act.” That’s right: it’s
every one of them.
The GOP majority is using the legislative process for virtue-signalling >>>> and grandstanding while showing disregard for individual rights and
Constitutional protections. It’s an abuse of power and process, and
anyone who voted for this monstrosity who doesn’t realize it defies the >>>> Bill of Rights is too ignorant to be in Congress.
I was amused to see that Rep. Jackson Lee, among the most prominent
Dunning-Kruger sufferers in the House, was one of the Democrats
sponsoring the bill, along with Rep. Stefanik, who knows better and
should be ashamed of herself.
All 320 House members who voted “yes” should. They disgrace the
Legislative Branch.
The absolutely only godly way (John 14:6) to stop the terrible
misbehavior toward Jews is as shown at http://WonderfullyHungry.org
You got that right!
Baruch HaShem.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!
While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO !
someone eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned by GOD whined:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!
LIE.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/01/ethics-and-constitutional-dunces-the-320-house-members-mostly-republicans-who-voted-for-the-antisemitism-awareness-act/
Ethics and Constitutional Dunces: The 320 House Members (Mostly
Republicans) Who Voted for the Antisemitism Awareness Act
MAY 1, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
You know, or should, that your conduct is unethical and outrageous when >>>>> it makes Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fl.) look good by comparison Gaetz voted >>>>> against HR 690, as every member of the House should have since it is >>>>> throbbingly unconstitutional on its face, no question, no argument, a >>>>> flat out First Amendment violation. Gaetz told his followers on
Twitter/X that he voted against the proposed legislation because it is a >>>>> ridiculous hate speech bill.
Antisemitism is wrong, but this legislation is written without regard >>>>> for the Constitution, common sense, or even the common understanding of >>>>> the meaning of words, he wrote. Bingo. The bill, in weasel words
remarkable even by recent Congressional standards, declares that
anti-Semitism is a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of >>>>> 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), and embraces an expansive definition of >>>>> the term adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United
States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department >>>>> of State; and includes the [c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism >>>>> identified in the IHRA definition.
The IHRA definition includes examples of pure speech, and I would expect >>>>> any junior in high school to know that these cannot be criminalized: >>>>>
Working definition of antisemitism :
Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as >>>>> hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of
antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or >>>>> their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious
facilities.
To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as
illustrations:
Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel,
conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar >>>>> to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as
antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to >>>>> harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for why things go >>>>> wrong. It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and >>>>> employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.
Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media,
schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into >>>>> account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the >>>>> name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical
allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective such >>>>> as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish
conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or
other societal institutions.
Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined
wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for >>>>> acts committed by non-Jews.
Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or
intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of
National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during >>>>> World War II (the Holocaust)
Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or >>>>> exaggerating the Holocaust.
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the
alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own >>>>> nations.
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by >>>>> claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor. >>>>> Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or >>>>> demanded of any other democratic nation.
Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., >>>>> claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or >>>>> Israelis.
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. >>>>> Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel. >>>>> Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for
example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic
materials in some countries).
I bolded the most obviously unconstitutional examples above that are >>>>> made illegal by the Antisemitism Awareness Act. Thats right: its >>>>> every one of them.
The GOP majority is using the legislative process for virtue-signalling >>>>> and grandstanding while showing disregard for individual rights and
Constitutional protections. Its an abuse of power and process, and
anyone who voted for this monstrosity who doesnt realize it defies the >>>>> Bill of Rights is too ignorant to be in Congress.
I was amused to see that Rep. Jackson Lee, among the most prominent
Dunning-Kruger sufferers in the House, was one of the Democrats
sponsoring the bill, along with Rep. Stefanik, who knows better and
should be ashamed of herself.
All 320 House members who voted yes should. They disgrace the
Legislative Branch.
The absolutely only godly way (John 14:6) to stop the terrible
misbehavior toward Jews is as shown at http://WonderfullyHungry.org
You got that right!
Baruch HaShem.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!
While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO !
Thank you for noting that I have no COVID.
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/01/ethics-and-constitutional-dunces-the-320-house-members-mostly-republicans-who-voted-for-the-antisemitism-awareness-act/
Ethics and Constitutional Dunces: The 320 House Members (Mostly
Republicans) Who Voted for the Antisemitism Awareness Act
MAY 1, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
You know, or should, that your conduct is unethical and outrageous when
it makes Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fl.) look good by comparison Gaetz voted
against HR 690, as every member of the House should have since it is >throbbingly unconstitutional on its face, no question, no argument, a
flat out First Amendment violation. Gaetz told his followers on
Twitter/X that he voted against the proposed legislation because it is a >ridiculous hate speech bill.
Antisemitism is wrong, but this legislation is written without regard
for the Constitution, common sense, or even the common understanding of
the meaning of words, he wrote. Bingo. The bill, in weasel words
remarkable even by recent Congressional standards, declares that >anti-Semitism is a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), and embraces an expansive definition of
the term adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United
States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department
of State; and includes the [c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism >identified in the IHRA definition.
The IHRA definition includes examples of pure speech, and I would expect
any junior in high school to know that these cannot be criminalized:
Working definition of antisemitism :
Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as >hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of
antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or >their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious >facilities.
To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as
illustrations:
Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel,
conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar
to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as
antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to
harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for why things go
wrong. It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and >employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.
Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media,
schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into >account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the
name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical
allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective such
as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish
conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or
other societal institutions.
Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined >wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for
acts committed by non-Jews.
Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or
intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of
National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during
World War II (the Holocaust)
Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or >exaggerating the Holocaust.
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the
alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own >nations.
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by >claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor. >Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or >demanded of any other democratic nation.
Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., >claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or >Israelis.
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. >Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel. >Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for
example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic
materials in some countries).
I bolded the most obviously unconstitutional examples above that are
made illegal by the Antisemitism Awareness Act. Thats right: its
every one of them.
The GOP majority is using the legislative process for virtue-signalling
and grandstanding while showing disregard for individual rights and >Constitutional protections. Its an abuse of power and process, and
anyone who voted for this monstrosity who doesnt realize it defies the
Bill of Rights is too ignorant to be in Congress.
I was amused to see that Rep. Jackson Lee, among the most prominent >Dunning-Kruger sufferers in the House, was one of the Democrats
sponsoring the bill, along with Rep. Stefanik, who knows better and
should be ashamed of herself.
All 320 House members who voted yes should. They disgrace the
Legislative Branch.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:Thank you for noting that I have no COVID.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/01/ethics-and-constitutional-dunces-the-320-house-members-mostly-republicans-who-voted-for-the-antisemitism-awareness-act/
Ethics and Constitutional Dunces: The 320 House Members (Mostly
Republicans) Who Voted for the Antisemitism Awareness Act
MAY 1, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
You know, or should, that your conduct is unethical and outrageous when >>>>> it makes Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fl.) look good by comparison Gaetz voted >>>>> against HR 690, as every member of the House should have since it is >>>>> throbbingly unconstitutional on its face, no question, no argument, a >>>>> flat out First Amendment violation. Gaetz told his followers on
Twitter/X that he voted against the proposed legislation because it is a >>>>> ridiculous hate speech bill.
Antisemitism is wrong, but this legislation is written without regard >>>>> for the Constitution, common sense, or even the common understanding of >>>>> the meaning of words, he wrote. Bingo. The bill, in weasel words
remarkable even by recent Congressional standards, declares that
anti-Semitism is a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of >>>>> 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), and embraces an expansive definition of >>>>> the term adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United
States is a member, which definition has been adopted by the Department >>>>> of State; and includes the [c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism >>>>> identified in the IHRA definition.
The IHRA definition includes examples of pure speech, and I would expect >>>>> any junior in high school to know that these cannot be criminalized: >>>>>
Working definition of antisemitism :
Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as >>>>> hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of
antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or >>>>> their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious
facilities.
To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as
illustrations:
Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel,
conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar >>>>> to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as
antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to >>>>> harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for why things go >>>>> wrong. It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and >>>>> employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.
Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media,
schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into >>>>> account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the >>>>> name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical
allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective such >>>>> as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish
conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or
other societal institutions.
Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined
wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for >>>>> acts committed by non-Jews.
Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or
intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of
National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during >>>>> World War II (the Holocaust)
Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or >>>>> exaggerating the Holocaust.
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the
alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own >>>>> nations.
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by >>>>> claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor. >>>>> Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or >>>>> demanded of any other democratic nation.
Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., >>>>> claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or >>>>> Israelis.
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. >>>>> Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel. >>>>> Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for
example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic
materials in some countries).
I bolded the most obviously unconstitutional examples above that are >>>>> made illegal by the Antisemitism Awareness Act. Thats right: its >>>>> every one of them.
The GOP majority is using the legislative process for virtue-signalling >>>>> and grandstanding while showing disregard for individual rights and
Constitutional protections. Its an abuse of power and process, and
anyone who voted for this monstrosity who doesnt realize it defies the >>>>> Bill of Rights is too ignorant to be in Congress.
I was amused to see that Rep. Jackson Lee, among the most prominent
Dunning-Kruger sufferers in the House, was one of the Democrats
sponsoring the bill, along with Rep. Stefanik, who knows better and
should be ashamed of herself.
All 320 House members who voted yes should. They disgrace the
Legislative Branch.
The absolutely only godly way (John 14:6) to stop the terrible
misbehavior toward Jews is as shown at http://WonderfullyHungry.org
You got that right!
Baruch HaShem.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!
While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO !
Michael
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
ReplyPermalinkOn Wed, 1 May 2024 07:50:48 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoNithing, there is nothing subhuman about my DNA, nor is there any analingus!
Mangina, you are cursed because of your choices and your conduct!Needledick, YOU are cursed because of your subhuman Asiatic DNA and
your ainlungus!
That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.You are a Nazi.You are a gook.
On Fri, 3 May 2024 07:56:59 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:Thank you for noting that I have no COVID.
I am wonderfully hungry!
While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO !
What about your anal warts and monkeypox?
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
Loose Cannon wrote:
On Fri, 3 May 2024 07:56:59 -0700, Michael EjercitoThere are no anal warts and there is no monkeypox!
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:Thank you for noting that I have no COVID.
I am wonderfully hungry!
While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with >>>> all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
Laus DEO !
What about your anal warts and monkeypox?
Michael
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
ReplyPermalinkOn Sat, 4 May 2024 08:06:33 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoWhite may be relevant to sex appeal; it has no relevance to honor,
That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.No, it wouldn't. I'm WHITE and you're an Asiatic shitskin
That would be better than being a Nazi dreckvolk.You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE.You are a gook - subhuman by excretion, ainlungual BY CHOICE.
(TheTruth) 05/04/24 AgainX2 praying w/ Michael here ...
https://narkive.com/H3a861Ct.5
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
(TheTruth) 05/04/24 AgainX2 praying w/ Michael here ...
https://narkive.com/H3a861Ct.5
Let us pray!
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
Her son was delivered by C-section.To write about better news, Lisa Chae, nee Vannatta, shows her babyHow can showing the rectal output of bestiality be better news, gook?
son on her Twitch stream for the first time.
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2137349559
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
ReplyPermalinkOn Wed, 8 May 2024 07:42:29 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoThere is nothing subson about her son.
Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'Her subson was delivered RECTALLY.
SHEIN3 days ago
Sat, 4 May 2024 20:43:23 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoHer son was delivered by C-section.
To write about better news, Lisa Chae, nee Vannatta, shows her babyHow can showing the rectal output of bestiality be better news, gook?
son on her Twitch stream for the first time.
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2137349559
there is nothing subhuman nor sub-baby about her baby, and there was nothing subpregnancy about her pregnancy.Her pregnancy and childbirth was the result of the union of husbandWrong. Her subpregnancy and excretion of subhuman sub-baby were the
and wife, penis and vagina, sperm and egg- the APOGEE of human sexuality.
result of Human and subhuman, anus and needledick, sperm and faeces,
the APOGEE of subhuman bestiality.
Wed, 8 May 2024 21:33:43 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoNormal people.
Here are pictures of her spoirting her baby bump.Seuss! Who the fuck wants to look at THAT?
https://www.instagram.com/p/C3DnMX-RPGI/?img_index=1
https://www.instagram.com/p/C2iXVB5y7xw/
No, she is announcing her pregnancy, the result of heterosexualityA video of her announcing her pregnancy.
https://www.twitch.tv/stpeach/clip/KathishDelightfulButterflyShazBotstix-
tsBIOMpj-dAqzkX0Announcing her BESTIALITY, you mean. She got, no shame.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
Thu, 9 May 2024 07:36:04 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoLisa, her husband, and their son are all the same species- the HUMAN species.
No, she is announcing her pregnancy, the result of heterosexualityHeterosexuality and matrimony are reserved for pairs of adult
and matrimony.
unrelated opposite sex HUMANS, gook....THIS is BESTIALITY!
<TheTruth> https://abcnews.go.com/US/hungry-doctor-diet-kill-georgia-teenager/story?id=16661077
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
(Jews) 05/11/24 Again praying w/ Michael here ...
https://narkive.com/H3a861Ct.5
On Sat, 04 May 2024 00:11:24 -0400, HeartDoc Andrew
<disciple@T3WiJ.com> wrote:
<TheTruth>https://abcnews.go.com/US/hungry-doctor-diet-kill-georgia-teenager/story?id=16661077
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJLojgoZwsw
https://gcmb.mylicense.com/verification
Name: Andrew Ben-Hua Chung
Designation: MD
Lic #: 40347
Profession: Physician
Subtype: Full
Status: Lapsed
Issued: 8/3/1995
Expires: 7/31/2017
Street Address: **********
MABLETON GA 30126
County: Cobb
Country: United States
Public Document 04-40347
ORDER OF THE BOARD:
Comes now, the Georgia Composite Medical Board and hereby enters an
Order after reviewing the Initial Decision in the above styled case.
After hearing the argument and testimony of the Appellant herein,
Andrew Ben-Hua Chung, M.D., the Board finds as follows after
deliberation:
FINDINGS OF FACT: The Board agrees with the initial decision.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Board agrees with the initial decision regarding conclusions of
law.
CONCLUSION
The Board Orders that the respondent's license is revoked instanter.
This the 9th day of March 2017.
Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface' SHEINabout 8 hours agoLisa engaged in HETEROSEXUALITY and MATRIMONY with the kind of man
ReplyPermalinkOn Sat, 11 May 2024 09:15:45 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
You are just jealous of her!No Human can POSSIBLY be jealous of a Human who engages in BESTIALITY!
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
(Jews) 05/11/24 Again praying w/ Michael here ...
https://narkive.com/H3a861Ct.5
Let us pray!
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
<TheTruth> 05/08/24 Memory/KK again vainjangling (1 Tim 1:6) ...
https://narkive.com/GHNKXeiE.10
Link to post explicating vainjangling by the eternally condemned: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/-xLGqnNjAAAJ
"Like a moth to flame, the eternally condemned tragically return to be
ever more cursed by GOD."
Behold in wide-eyed wonder and amazement at the continued fulfillment
of this prophecy as clearly demonstrated within the following USENET
threads:
(1) Link to thread titled "LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth is our #1
Example of being wonderfully hungry;"
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/_iVmOb7q3_Q/m/E8L7TNNtAgAJ
(2) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry;"
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.med.cardiology/uCPb3ldOv5M
(3) Link to thread titled "A very very very simple definition of sin;"
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/xunFWhan_AM
(4) Link to thread titled "The LORD says 'Blessed are you who hunger
now;'"
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.bible.prophecy/e4sW8dr44rM
(5) Link to thread titled "Being wonderfully hungry like LORD Jesus;"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.bible.prophecy/xPY1Uzl-ZNk/QeKLDNCpCwAJ
... for the continued benefit (Romans 8:28) of those of us who are http://WonderfullyHungry.org like GOD ( http://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) with
all glory ( http://bit.ly/Psalm112_1 ) to the LORD.
Source: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.med.cardiology/O23NguTslhI/pIZcsOCJBwAJ
Laus DEO !
In honor of Mother's Day, I share this article.
https://orangecounty.momcollective.com/parenting-wisdom/educational/raising-a-mixed-race-girl-in-a-white-world/
Raising A Mixed Race Girl In A White World
By Liz McTan -February 26, 2020
FacebookTwitterPinterestReddItEmail
mixed race girl
My husband and I looked at each other shocked. We had just heard our
daughter say something we never thought would be an issue. Our gorgeous >little mixed race girl, only three years old, said she didnt think she
was beautiful.
Suddenly, I was aware I had a blind spot.
I had assumed because everyone comments how pretty she is all the
time, and because she is so clearly gorgeous that us reinforcing her
other qualities would be enough.
I didnt expect that all the people she herself thought of as
beautiful didnt look like her.
It happened as I was watching my daughter playing with her precious Anna
doll (from FROZEN) with her Dad. They were brushing Annas hair. My
husband asked her, oh look at her long hair. Is Anna beautiful? Yes,
said my daughter quickly.
Then he asked Is Juni beautiful? And then, just as quickly, my
gorgeous little three-year-old said, no.
Hearing her say she didnt think she was beautiful was like a punch in
the gut.
I jumped into the conversation:
OF COURSE JUNI IS BEAUTIFUL! JUNI IS ALSO STRONG AND BRAVE JUST LIKE
ANNA, AND SHES KIND AND FUNNY LIKE ANNA! AND BEAUTIFUL! JUNI IS VERY
PRETTY LIKE ANNA! WHY WOULD YOU SAY JUNIS NOT BEAUTIFUL, BABY?
She seemed so unbothered. We were definitely the more upset ones in this >situation. But as we talked, she finally said it.
MAMA RED HAIR. ANNA RED HAIR. JUNI NO RED HAIR.
It hit me like a ton of bricks. My daughter is a mixed race girl. Her >favorite character is a white girl, with naturally red hair just like
me. She saw those as the things that make you beautiful. Sweet, simple,
and incredibly painful to realize.
The reality is, there are no childrens characters like my mixed race
girl, half asian and half white.
My child is so uniquely beautiful. I had assumed that other people
commenting on it all the time would sink under her skin, and if anything
we would spend her life making sure she didnt JUST value her beauty.
I knew that over-valuing my looks made some difficulties for me later in >life. However Id never had a lack of representation.
I grew up seeing myself in THE LITTLE MERMAID. In PIPPI LONGSTOCKING. In >Jessica Rabbit. I knew my red hair made me special.
While we are generally getting more representation for people of color
and ethnic minorities in our media, role models for mixed race girls and
boys are in a whole different ballgame. Representation is a process in
terms of our culture.
How long did it take to get people of color represented beyond the >stereotypical roles at all? The answer is way too long.
When my daughter watches her favorite cartoons, there is no one with her
skin tone, her eye shape, and hair color combo.
She is such a perfect mixture of our features. We get people commenting
all the time:
WHERE DID SHE GET THOSE EYES!?
The check out girl at the super market asks, looking at me and her
father with our dark eyes. My daughters eyes are a
hazel/grey/blue/green that she inherited from her uncles. Her hair is
just slightly auburn in the light, but mostly a light brown neither of
us have. Her eye shape is a subtle mix of her fathers almond and my own
more round shape. This all makes her totally unique.
It also means no one looks like her and she will deal with the issues
her life long.
Things my white privilege made me incredibly unaware about as the mother
of a mixed race girl.
So what to do? Well, hop on the internet and talk to other mothers of
mixed race children. While it might be that there is a lack of
representation in media, mixed kids are more common than ever before.
Mixed race families are practically the norm here in Southern
California. Juniper certainly isnt the only one in our friendship
group, school, or anywhere else we go.
My friends suggested things from Barbies that look mixed race to this
great article about how to celebrate diversity with our kids. Books are
on their way to our house as we speak like Its Okay to Be Different,
and The Colors of Us.
Mostly, Ive realized that issues of race and white privilege come much >earlier in life than I anticipated.
Thats probably no shock to my friends who arent white. However, this
stuff takes time to learn if you havent lived it yourself and even the
most woke of us have so much room to grow.
I just hope I can do enough to make sure my mixed race girl knows she is >beautiful, and her differences make her even more so.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: The LORD says "Blessed are you who hunger now ..."
Shame on andrew, look at his red face.
He is trying to pull a fast one. His scripture bit is found among these:
'14 Bible verses about Spiritual Hunger'
Psalms
81:10 I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: >open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it.
Proverbs
13:25 The righteous has enough to satisfy his appetite, But the stomach of >the wicked is in need.
Joel
2:26 And ye shall eat in plenty, and be satisfied, and praise the name of
the LORD your God, that hath dealt wondrously with you: and my
people shall never be ashamed.
Psalms
107 For he satisfies the thirsty and fills the hungry with good things.
Acts
14:17 "Yet he did not leave himself without witness, for he did good by >giving you rains from heaven and fruitful seasons, satisfying
your hearts with food and gladness."
someone eternally condemned & ever more cursed by GOD perseverated:
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Subject: a very very very simple definition of sin ...
Does andrew's "definition" agree with scripture? Let's see in 1 John:
John wrote this to christians. The greek grammer (sic) speaks of an ongoing >> status. He includes himself in that status.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, >> and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is >> not in us.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 302 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 122:37:17 |
| Calls: | 6,769 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,299 |
| Messages: | 5,376,793 |
| Posted today: | 2 |