Mike Colangelo wrote:
The cases are independent from one another in terms of origination, but they >>can't go to trial simultaneously. Thanks to corrupt judges, Trump has managed to
delay the other cases. His attempts to delay this one failed, so it goes first.
The one that should have gone first, the stolen national security documents >>case, should have started months ago, but Trump owns the judge, and she is doing
everything she can to help him avoid trial.
You have to give the far-right credit for effectively consolidating
their power through judicial appointments. It won't be an easy task
to pry them out. We should have gotten started in 2015, but we didn't
even consider the possibility that the Donald might actually win the >election... or, more accurately, that Hillary might lose. Now, SCOTUS
will be pegged right for a generation... at least.
I think that the Donald will lose in '24, but it ain't a done deal by
any metric. I think that most Americans will view Biden as I do...
not a great president, but better than a poke in the eye with a sharp >stick... and vote, essentially, *against* the Donald. (My vote for
Biden isn't going to be *for* Biden; it'll be against the Donald.)
I'm hoping that sanity prevails in the voting booths across the
country.
"X, formerly known as \"!Jones\" wrote:
Mike Colangelo wrote:
The cases are independent from one another in terms of origination, but they >>>can't go to trial simultaneously. Thanks to corrupt judges, Trump has managed to
delay the other cases. His attempts to delay this one failed, so it goes first.
The one that should have gone first, the stolen national security documents >>>case, should have started months ago, but Trump owns the judge, and she is doing
everything she can to help him avoid trial.
You have to give the far-right credit for effectively consolidating
their power through judicial appointments. It won't be an easy task
to pry them out. We should have gotten started in 2015, but we didn't
even consider the possibility that the Donald might actually win the >>election... or, more accurately, that Hillary might lose. Now, SCOTUS
will be pegged right for a generation... at least.
I think that the Donald will lose in '24, but it ain't a done deal by
any metric. I think that most Americans will view Biden as I do...
not a great president, but better than a poke in the eye with a sharp >>stick... and vote, essentially, *against* the Donald. (My vote for
Biden isn't going to be *for* Biden; it'll be against the Donald.)
I'm hoping that sanity prevails in the voting booths across the
country.
In the interim, I am nonetheless wonderfully hungry for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, X, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 302 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 120:55:25 |
Calls: | 6,769 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 12,299 |
Messages: | 5,376,773 |
Posted today: | 2 |