• (Fourier) Expertly: Greeting Trevor Wilson on 04/10/24 ...

    From HeartDoc Andrew@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Wed Apr 10 18:05:09 2024
    XPost: alt.atheism, alt.global-warming, aus.politics
    XPost: talk.environment, talk.politics.guns

    Trevor Wilson wrote:
    warren wrote:

    Models and projections are just that, theoretical conjecture. None of it
    is factual.


    **Here's the thing:

    Way back in the first half of the 19th century, my favourite
    mathematician, Joseph Fourier, published his hypothesis that CO2 was an >atmospheric gas that prevented the planet from freezing, provided it was
    in sufficient quantities. Further: Fourier extended his hypothesis to
    include the possibility the more CO2 would cause the planet to warm >excessively:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Fourier#Discovery_of_the_greenhouse_effect

    Before the end of the 19th century, Svante Arrhenius had solidified
    Fourier's hypothesis into a theory, backed by extensive experimental
    data and upwards of 100,000 hand calculations. His theory has never been >successfully challenged. NOT ONCE.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svante_Arrhenius#Greenhouse_effect

    Arrhenius' predictions have been shown to be remarkably accurate. Until
    a better theory to explain the present warming trend has been presented,
    then Arrhenius' theory is the accepted one.

    During the 1980s, more predictions were made, which have been shown to
    be quite accurate:

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/ianpalmer/2023/01/17/a-fresh-reading-of-exxons-predictions-of-global-warming-and-climate-change-from-40-years-ago/?sh=3d78f5667840

    https://phys.org/news/2012-04-climate-eerily-accurate.html

    So, the proof is in. Read it.

    If you dispute the facts, then publish your own hypothesis and submit it
    for peer-review.

    In the interim, I am nonetheless wonderfully hungry for food right now
    (Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Trevor, and others reading this, also have
    a healthy appetite for food right now too.

    So how are you ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From HeartDoc Andrew@21:1/5 to All on Wed Apr 10 18:06:30 2024
    XPost: alt.atheism, alt.global-warming, aus.politics
    XPost: talk.environment, talk.politics.guns

    (Fourier) 04/10/24 Again not a LoosePeeledQuackIdiot bigot ...

    https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/Ai33hw5PINI/m/wytVpY68MwAJ

    Instead be "woke" to the sin of racial prejudice:

    https://tinyurl.com/JesusIsWoke (i.e. not a Nazi bigot) *and* risen!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Trevor Wilson@21:1/5 to HeartDoc Andrew on Thu Apr 11 08:19:15 2024
    XPost: alt.atheism, alt.global-warming, aus.politics
    XPost: talk.environment, talk.politics.guns

    On 11/04/2024 8:06 am, HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
    (Fourier) 04/10/24 Again not a LoosePeeledQuackIdiot bigot ...

    https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/Ai33hw5PINI/m/wytVpY68MwAJ

    Instead be "woke" to the sin of racial prejudice:

    https://tinyurl.com/JesusIsWoke (i.e. not a Nazi bigot) *and* risen!!!

    **Jesus is dead, you moron.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Trevor Wilson@21:1/5 to HeartDoc Andrew on Thu Apr 11 08:18:43 2024
    XPost: alt.atheism, alt.global-warming, aus.politics
    XPost: talk.environment, talk.politics.guns

    On 11/04/2024 8:05 am, HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
    Trevor Wilson wrote:
    warren wrote:

    Models and projections are just that, theoretical conjecture. None of it >>> is factual.


    **Here's the thing:

    Way back in the first half of the 19th century, my favourite
    mathematician, Joseph Fourier, published his hypothesis that CO2 was an
    atmospheric gas that prevented the planet from freezing, provided it was
    in sufficient quantities. Further: Fourier extended his hypothesis to
    include the possibility the more CO2 would cause the planet to warm
    excessively:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Fourier#Discovery_of_the_greenhouse_effect

    Before the end of the 19th century, Svante Arrhenius had solidified
    Fourier's hypothesis into a theory, backed by extensive experimental
    data and upwards of 100,000 hand calculations. His theory has never been
    successfully challenged. NOT ONCE.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svante_Arrhenius#Greenhouse_effect

    Arrhenius' predictions have been shown to be remarkably accurate. Until
    a better theory to explain the present warming trend has been presented,
    then Arrhenius' theory is the accepted one.

    During the 1980s, more predictions were made, which have been shown to
    be quite accurate:

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/ianpalmer/2023/01/17/a-fresh-reading-of-exxons-predictions-of-global-warming-and-climate-change-from-40-years-ago/?sh=3d78f5667840

    https://phys.org/news/2012-04-climate-eerily-accurate.html

    So, the proof is in. Read it.

    If you dispute the facts, then publish your own hypothesis and submit it
    for peer-review.

    In the interim, I am nonetheless wonderfully hungry for food right now
    (Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Trevor, and others reading this, also have
    a healthy appetite for food right now too.

    So how are you ?

    **Stick your fucking Bible quotes up your arse, you dumb shit-for-brains.

    Cite science, not bullshit.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Hendry's Chop shop@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Wed Apr 10 17:59:47 2024
    XPost: alt.atheism, alt.global-warming, aus.politics
    XPost: talk.environment, talk.politics.guns

    On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 08:18:43 +1000
    Trevor Wilson <trevor@rageaudio.com.au> wrote:

    On 11/04/2024 8:05 am, HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
    Trevor Wilson wrote:
    warren wrote:

    Models and projections are just that, theoretical conjecture.
    None of it is factual.


    **Here's the thing:

    Way back in the first half of the 19th century, my favourite
    mathematician, Joseph Fourier, published his hypothesis that CO2
    was an atmospheric gas that prevented the planet from freezing,
    provided it was in sufficient quantities. Further: Fourier
    extended his hypothesis to include the possibility the more CO2
    would cause the planet to warm excessively:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Fourier#Discovery_of_the_greenhouse_effect

    Before the end of the 19th century, Svante Arrhenius had solidified
    Fourier's hypothesis into a theory, backed by extensive
    experimental data and upwards of 100,000 hand calculations. His
    theory has never been successfully challenged. NOT ONCE.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svante_Arrhenius#Greenhouse_effect

    Arrhenius' predictions have been shown to be remarkably accurate.
    Until a better theory to explain the present warming trend has
    been presented, then Arrhenius' theory is the accepted one.

    During the 1980s, more predictions were made, which have been
    shown to be quite accurate:

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/ianpalmer/2023/01/17/a-fresh-reading-of-exxons-predictions-of-global-warming-and-climate-change-from-40-years-ago/?sh=3d78f5667840

    https://phys.org/news/2012-04-climate-eerily-accurate.html

    So, the proof is in. Read it.

    If you dispute the facts, then publish your own hypothesis and
    submit it for peer-review.

    In the interim, I am nonetheless wonderfully hungry for food right
    now (Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Trevor, and others reading this,
    also have a healthy appetite for food right now too.

    So how are you ?

    **Stick your fucking Bible quotes up your arse, you dumb
    shit-for-brains.

    Cite science, not bullshit.


    Here's what his "science" does to children:


    https://www.ajc.com/blog/investigations/wonderfully-hungry-doc-suspended-medical-board/cqUeGUzdksyhvhTfYYQmvI/

    "Wonderfully hungry" doc suspended by medical board
    Aug 4, 2016 ... Andrew Chung appeared Thursday before the Georgia
    Composite Medical Board ... Chung, who said he was trained at Emory ...
    Chung, who goes by "Heart ...

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2165270/Dr-Andrew-Chung-advocates-wonderfully-hungry-friends-Ebony-Berry-accused-starving-daughter.html

    The doctor behind the 'hunger cult' that obsessed a mother who 'starved
    her 16-year-old daughter to death'

    A mother who is accused of starving her daughter to death after the 16-year-old died weighing just 40 pounds was obsessed with the teachings of a doctor who advocates being 'wonderfully hungry.'

    Dr Andrew Chung, a cardiologist who graduated from one of the most prestigious medical schools in the nation, mixes scripture with his medical advice and encourages his followers to eat just two pounds a day -- less than half what the average American
    consumes.

    Ebony Berry, 38,is friends with Dr Chung, he said. After her daughter, Markea Blakely-Berry, died on Saturday and she was arrested for murder, Dr Chung also visited her in jail.

    Now, it is revealed police have questioned the controversial doctor
    about the teen's horrific death.

    In an online video posted to YouTube, Dr Chung is 'interviewed' by a nurse, who is filming the encounter.

    He says, 'I'm wonderfully hungry. How about you?'

    In response to his online postings -- which are one part medical advice, one part references to Bible verses -- he has been called a 'quack' who advocates a 'cult religion.'

    He denies that his teachings are a cult, but even after the death of
    Markea, told WOOD-TV: 'We wish everyone could truthfully say they're wonderfully hungry.

    WHAT THE FLYING FUCK?!?!?!?!???

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)