warren wrote:
Models and projections are just that, theoretical conjecture. None of it
is factual.
**Here's the thing:
Way back in the first half of the 19th century, my favourite
mathematician, Joseph Fourier, published his hypothesis that CO2 was an >atmospheric gas that prevented the planet from freezing, provided it was
in sufficient quantities. Further: Fourier extended his hypothesis to
include the possibility the more CO2 would cause the planet to warm >excessively:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Fourier#Discovery_of_the_greenhouse_effect
Before the end of the 19th century, Svante Arrhenius had solidified
Fourier's hypothesis into a theory, backed by extensive experimental
data and upwards of 100,000 hand calculations. His theory has never been >successfully challenged. NOT ONCE.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svante_Arrhenius#Greenhouse_effect
Arrhenius' predictions have been shown to be remarkably accurate. Until
a better theory to explain the present warming trend has been presented,
then Arrhenius' theory is the accepted one.
During the 1980s, more predictions were made, which have been shown to
be quite accurate:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ianpalmer/2023/01/17/a-fresh-reading-of-exxons-predictions-of-global-warming-and-climate-change-from-40-years-ago/?sh=3d78f5667840
https://phys.org/news/2012-04-climate-eerily-accurate.html
So, the proof is in. Read it.
If you dispute the facts, then publish your own hypothesis and submit it
for peer-review.
(Fourier) 04/10/24 Again not a LoosePeeledQuackIdiot bigot ...
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/Ai33hw5PINI/m/wytVpY68MwAJ
Instead be "woke" to the sin of racial prejudice:
https://tinyurl.com/JesusIsWoke (i.e. not a Nazi bigot) *and* risen!!!
Trevor Wilson wrote:
warren wrote:
Models and projections are just that, theoretical conjecture. None of it >>> is factual.
**Here's the thing:
Way back in the first half of the 19th century, my favourite
mathematician, Joseph Fourier, published his hypothesis that CO2 was an
atmospheric gas that prevented the planet from freezing, provided it was
in sufficient quantities. Further: Fourier extended his hypothesis to
include the possibility the more CO2 would cause the planet to warm
excessively:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Fourier#Discovery_of_the_greenhouse_effect
Before the end of the 19th century, Svante Arrhenius had solidified
Fourier's hypothesis into a theory, backed by extensive experimental
data and upwards of 100,000 hand calculations. His theory has never been
successfully challenged. NOT ONCE.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svante_Arrhenius#Greenhouse_effect
Arrhenius' predictions have been shown to be remarkably accurate. Until
a better theory to explain the present warming trend has been presented,
then Arrhenius' theory is the accepted one.
During the 1980s, more predictions were made, which have been shown to
be quite accurate:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ianpalmer/2023/01/17/a-fresh-reading-of-exxons-predictions-of-global-warming-and-climate-change-from-40-years-ago/?sh=3d78f5667840
https://phys.org/news/2012-04-climate-eerily-accurate.html
So, the proof is in. Read it.
If you dispute the facts, then publish your own hypothesis and submit it
for peer-review.
In the interim, I am nonetheless wonderfully hungry for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Trevor, and others reading this, also have
a healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
On 11/04/2024 8:05 am, HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
Trevor Wilson wrote:
warren wrote:
Models and projections are just that, theoretical conjecture.
None of it is factual.
**Here's the thing:
Way back in the first half of the 19th century, my favourite
mathematician, Joseph Fourier, published his hypothesis that CO2
was an atmospheric gas that prevented the planet from freezing,
provided it was in sufficient quantities. Further: Fourier
extended his hypothesis to include the possibility the more CO2
would cause the planet to warm excessively:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Fourier#Discovery_of_the_greenhouse_effect
Before the end of the 19th century, Svante Arrhenius had solidified
Fourier's hypothesis into a theory, backed by extensive
experimental data and upwards of 100,000 hand calculations. His
theory has never been successfully challenged. NOT ONCE.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svante_Arrhenius#Greenhouse_effect
Arrhenius' predictions have been shown to be remarkably accurate.
Until a better theory to explain the present warming trend has
been presented, then Arrhenius' theory is the accepted one.
During the 1980s, more predictions were made, which have been
shown to be quite accurate:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ianpalmer/2023/01/17/a-fresh-reading-of-exxons-predictions-of-global-warming-and-climate-change-from-40-years-ago/?sh=3d78f5667840
https://phys.org/news/2012-04-climate-eerily-accurate.html
So, the proof is in. Read it.
If you dispute the facts, then publish your own hypothesis and
submit it for peer-review.
In the interim, I am nonetheless wonderfully hungry for food right
now (Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Trevor, and others reading this,
also have a healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
**Stick your fucking Bible quotes up your arse, you dumb
shit-for-brains.
Cite science, not bullshit.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 302 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 121:31:01 |
Calls: | 6,769 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 12,299 |
Messages: | 5,376,787 |
Posted today: | 2 |