XPost: alt.atheism, alt.global-warming, aus.politics
XPost: talk.environment, talk.politics.guns
On Tue, 09 Apr 2024 15:24:17 -0400, HeartDoc Andrew <
achung@EmoryCardiology.com> wrote:
Paul Aubrin wrote:
Scout a écrit :
"Paul Aubrin" wrote in message
Le 08/04/2024 à 00:13, warren a écrit :
Models and projections are just that, theoretical conjecture. None
of it
is factual.
Let's have a look at the correlation between each year human emissions >>>> and the corresponding temperature increase. Each point of the diagram
below is a year (temperature variation, emissions).
https://www.cjoint.com/data/NDjhzyOQHgZ_Corr-CO2-variationsTemp.png
If emissions commanded temperatures, the graph should look like a
straight line.
Ok.. now let's expand the time scale.. and see if it shows the same
correlation.
https://www.odt.co.nz/sites/default/files/story/2016/04/the_case_for_global_warming_is_in_serious_doubt_6102000384.gif
Your answer is irrelevant. Each point in the following diagram is >>associated with a calendar year. It links the human CO2 emissions
increase for the year with the temperature increase for the same year.
If emissions command temperatures, all the points should be (more or
less) aligned. >>https://www.cjoint.com/data/NDjhzyOQHgZ_Corr-CO2-variationsTemp.png
They are not. CO2 influence on temperatures is not detectable.
In the interim, I am nonetheless wonderfully hungry for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Paul, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
(no reply for > 25 min)
Your not being able to reply appropriately over the past 25 min since
being greeted here means, Paul, you're #StatCOVID19Test **positive**
which indicates you're possibly infected w/#COVID (See
https://youtu.be/F9cjfEiLQIk or
https://tinyurl.com/StatCOVID19Test
for the science).
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
