https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/03/19/heluva-scotus-choice-there-joe/
Heluva SCOTUS Choice There, Joe!
MARCH 19, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
Great. We now have a U.S. Supreme Court Justice who doesnt like the
First Amendment. The Babylon Bee hardly had to be satirical to come up
with that headline. During yesterdays oral arguments before the U.S.
Supreme Court in Murthy v. Missouri, the newest Justice and the only one >appointed by President Biden, Kentanji Brown Jackson revealed a
frightening hostility to the most important guaranteed principle of
American freedom from oppressive government.
My biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment
hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important
time periods, Jackson told Louisiana Solicitor General Benjamin
Aguiaga as he argued against allowing Big Brother to recruit Big Tech
as a political ally by intimidating social media platforms into removing >posts the government finds inconvenient. I read Jacksons quotes
yesterday with genuine horror. My sister, a federal litigator of liberal >tendencies, had assured me that Jackson was a smart, solid, trustworthy >jurist based on her experiences appearing before her. Justice Jackson
may be smart, but trustworthy she isnt. Intentionally or accidentally, >President Bidens openly DEI appointment to fill the Court slot vacated
by Stephen Breyer installed the perfect tool to assist aspiring Democrat >totalitarians to achieve their agendas.
Oh please, tell us again how Donald Trump is the existential threat to >democracy.
Hamstringing the government is the entire principle underlying the
First Amendment, indeed the entire Bill of Rights. Jackson lament >demonstrates the socking devolution of the American Left. On the
celebrated, ultra-liberal Warren Court that brought us school
integration, the rights have a lawyer appointed and the fruit of the >poisonous tree among other advances in civil rights, liberal icon
William O. Douglas and fellow Democrat Hugo Black kept reminding the
public and the government that Congress shall make no law abridging the >freedom of speech means that Congress shall make no law abridging the >freedom of speech, and that in the Bill of Rights, Constitution
prohibitions on Congress are prohibitions on the government as a
whole. In those golden days, it was the evil conservatives trying to
tell people what they were allowed to see, read and hear.
Jacksons statement about the perils of hamstringing the government were
just the beginning of her cheerleading for government censorship. Some
might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to
protect the citizens of this country she said, making it obvious that
she was one of the some. You seem to be suggesting that that duty
cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring >platforms to take down harmful information, continued Jackson. So can
you help me? Because Im really worried about that. Because youve got
the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening
circumstances, from the governments perspective, and youre saying that
the government cant interact with the source of those problems.
Ah, yes, those threatening circumstances. Cant have that. You know,
like telling the public about the Presidents sons laptop, questioning
the edicts of the CDC during the pandemic and the suspicious undermining
of election integrity or endangering Democratic power in Washington, D.C.
Despite indisputable proof that the Department of Health and Human
Services, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, Census Bureau, Department of
Homeland Security, Department of State, FBI, Department of Justice, and
the White House demanded Big Tech companies like Twitter (now X),
Facebook, and YouTube interfere with Americans attempting to publicize
facts and opinions the government preferred to keep buried, Jackson
appeared to see this as completely benign.
Judge Terry Doughty, chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the
Western District of Louisiana in his 155-page ruling described the Biden >administrations efforts to push social media platforms into doing its >censorship the most massive attack against free speech in United
States history. But Joes justice doesnt see it that way at all. In >another exchange, Jackson argued that a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic or >other declared emergencies should allow the always well-meaning
government expand constitutional limits. You know, like Woodrow Wilson >locking up dissenters during World War I. Biden already has tried to use
his emergency powers illicitly, like ordering landlords not to evict >deadbeat tenants, or allowing degree holders to skip their obligations
to pay back loans. Most dictators take over in emergencies, and the
freedom of speech is usually the first right to go.
Im interested in your view that the context doesnt change the First >Amendment principles, Jackson said. I understood our First Amendment >jurisprudence to require heightened scrutiny of government restrictions
of speech, but not necessarily a total prohibition when youre talking
about a compelling interest of the government to ensure, for example,
that the public has accurate information in the context of a >once-in-a-lifetime pandemic.
She actually said that, even though it is now undeniable that the public
was given false, deliberately misleading and repeatedly wrong
information by the government (as well as the fearmongering news media). >Conservative writer Matt Margolis correctly observed this morning, More >often than not, it seems that the speech that the government censored or >suppressed turned out to be right in the end.
Naturally, the mainstream media is soft-peddling Justice Jacksons
ominous unmasking as a government censorship advocate. But the public
needs to understand: she stands for and with the party and the President
that are claiming only they can save democracy, when it is becoming >increasingly clear that the exact opposite is the truth.
Michael Ejercito wrote:
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/03/19/heluva-scotus-choice-there-joe/
Heluva SCOTUS Choice There, Joe!
MARCH 19, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
Great. We now have a U.S. Supreme Court Justice who doesn’t like the
First Amendment. The Babylon Bee hardly had to be satirical to come up
with that headline. During yesterday’s oral arguments before the U.S.
Supreme Court in Murthy v. Missouri, the newest Justice and the only one
appointed by President Biden, Kentanji Brown Jackson revealed a
frightening hostility to the most important guaranteed principle of
American freedom from oppressive government.
“My biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment
hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important
time periods,” Jackson told Louisiana Solicitor General Benjamin
Aguiñaga as he argued against allowing Big Brother to recruit Big Tech
as a political ally by intimidating social media platforms into removing
posts the government finds inconvenient. I read Jackson’s quotes
yesterday with genuine horror. My sister, a federal litigator of liberal
tendencies, had assured me that Jackson was a smart, solid, trustworthy
jurist based on her experiences appearing before her. Justice Jackson
may be smart, but trustworthy she isn’t. Intentionally or accidentally,
President Biden’s openly DEI appointment to fill the Court slot vacated
by Stephen Breyer installed the perfect tool to assist aspiring Democrat
totalitarians to achieve their agendas.
Oh please, tell us again how Donald Trump is the existential threat to
democracy.
“Hamstringing the government” is the entire principle underlying the
First Amendment, indeed the entire Bill of Rights. Jackson’ lament
demonstrates the socking devolution of the American Left. On the
celebrated, ultra-liberal Warren Court that brought us school
integration, the rights have a lawyer appointed and “the fruit of the
poisonous tree” among other advances in civil rights, liberal icon
William O. Douglas and fellow Democrat Hugo Black kept reminding the
public and the government that “Congress shall make no law abridging the >> freedom of speech” means that Congress shall make no law abridging the
freedom of speech, and that in the Bill of Rights, Constitution
prohibitions on “Congress” are prohibitions on the government as a
whole. In those golden days, it was the evil conservatives trying to
tell people what they were allowed to see, read and hear.
Jackson’s statement about the perils of hamstringing the government were >> just the beginning of her cheerleading for government censorship. “Some
might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to
protect the citizens of this country” she said, making it obvious that
she was one of the ‘some.” “You seem to be suggesting that that duty >> cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring
platforms to take down harmful information,” continued Jackson. “So can >> you help me? Because I’m really worried about that. Because you’ve got >> the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening
circumstances, from the government’s perspective, and you’re saying that >> the government can’t interact with the source of those problems.”
Ah, yes, those “threatening circumstances.” Can’t have that. You know, >> like telling the public about the President’s son’s laptop, questioning >> the edicts of the CDC during the pandemic and the suspicious undermining
of election integrity …or endangering Democratic power in Washington, D.C. >>
Despite indisputable proof that the Department of Health and Human
Services, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, Census Bureau, Department of
Homeland Security, Department of State, FBI, Department of Justice, and
the White House demanded Big Tech companies like Twitter (now X),
Facebook, and YouTube interfere with Americans attempting to publicize
facts and opinions the government preferred to keep buried, Jackson
appeared to see this as completely benign.
Judge Terry Doughty, chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the
Western District of Louisiana in his 155-page ruling described the Biden
administration’s efforts to push social media platforms into doing its
censorship “the most massive attack against free speech in United
States’ history.” But Joe’s justice doesn’t see it that way at all. In
another exchange, Jackson argued that a “once-in-a-lifetime pandemic” or >> other declared “emergencies” should allow the always well-meaning
government expand constitutional limits. You know, like Woodrow Wilson
locking up dissenters during World War I. Biden already has tried to use
his “emergency powers” illicitly, like ordering landlords not to evict >> deadbeat tenants, or allowing degree holders to skip their obligations
to pay back loans. Most dictators take over in “emergencies,” and the
freedom of speech is usually the first right to go.
“I’m interested in your view that the context doesn’t change the First >> Amendment principles,” Jackson said. “I understood our First Amendment >> jurisprudence to require heightened scrutiny of government restrictions
of speech, but not necessarily a total prohibition when you’re talking
about a compelling interest of the government to ensure, for example,
that the public has accurate information in the context of a
once-in-a-lifetime pandemic.”
She actually said that, even though it is now undeniable that the public
was given false, deliberately misleading and repeatedly wrong
information by the government (as well as the fearmongering news media).
Conservative writer Matt Margolis correctly observed this morning, “More >> often than not, it seems that the speech that the government censored or
suppressed turned out to be right in the end.”
Naturally, the mainstream media is soft-peddling Justice Jackson’s
ominous unmasking as a government censorship advocate. But the public
needs to understand: she stands for and with the party and the President
that are claiming only they can “save democracy,” when it is becoming
increasingly clear that the exact opposite is the truth.
In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
"convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
longer effective.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry ( https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
So how are you ?
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/03/19/heluva-scotus-choice-there-joe/
Heluva SCOTUS Choice There, Joe!
MARCH 19, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
Great. We now have a U.S. Supreme Court Justice who doesnt like the
First Amendment. The Babylon Bee hardly had to be satirical to come up
with that headline. During yesterdays oral arguments before the U.S.
Supreme Court in Murthy v. Missouri, the newest Justice and the only one >>> appointed by President Biden, Kentanji Brown Jackson revealed a
frightening hostility to the most important guaranteed principle of
American freedom from oppressive government.
My biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment
hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important
time periods, Jackson told Louisiana Solicitor General Benjamin
Aguiaga as he argued against allowing Big Brother to recruit Big Tech
as a political ally by intimidating social media platforms into removing >>> posts the government finds inconvenient. I read Jacksons quotes
yesterday with genuine horror. My sister, a federal litigator of liberal >>> tendencies, had assured me that Jackson was a smart, solid, trustworthy
jurist based on her experiences appearing before her. Justice Jackson
may be smart, but trustworthy she isnt. Intentionally or accidentally,
President Bidens openly DEI appointment to fill the Court slot vacated
by Stephen Breyer installed the perfect tool to assist aspiring Democrat >>> totalitarians to achieve their agendas.
Oh please, tell us again how Donald Trump is the existential threat to
democracy.
Hamstringing the government is the entire principle underlying the
First Amendment, indeed the entire Bill of Rights. Jackson lament
demonstrates the socking devolution of the American Left. On the
celebrated, ultra-liberal Warren Court that brought us school
integration, the rights have a lawyer appointed and the fruit of the
poisonous tree among other advances in civil rights, liberal icon
William O. Douglas and fellow Democrat Hugo Black kept reminding the
public and the government that Congress shall make no law abridging the >>> freedom of speech means that Congress shall make no law abridging the
freedom of speech, and that in the Bill of Rights, Constitution
prohibitions on Congress are prohibitions on the government as a
whole. In those golden days, it was the evil conservatives trying to
tell people what they were allowed to see, read and hear.
Jacksons statement about the perils of hamstringing the government were >>> just the beginning of her cheerleading for government censorship. Some
might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to
protect the citizens of this country she said, making it obvious that
she was one of the some. You seem to be suggesting that that duty
cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring
platforms to take down harmful information, continued Jackson. So can
you help me? Because Im really worried about that. Because youve got
the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening
circumstances, from the governments perspective, and youre saying that >>> the government cant interact with the source of those problems.
Ah, yes, those threatening circumstances. Cant have that. You know,
like telling the public about the Presidents sons laptop, questioning
the edicts of the CDC during the pandemic and the suspicious undermining >>> of election integrity or endangering Democratic power in Washington, D.C. >>>
Despite indisputable proof that the Department of Health and Human
Services, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Centers >>> for Disease Control and Prevention, Census Bureau, Department of
Homeland Security, Department of State, FBI, Department of Justice, and
the White House demanded Big Tech companies like Twitter (now X),
Facebook, and YouTube interfere with Americans attempting to publicize
facts and opinions the government preferred to keep buried, Jackson
appeared to see this as completely benign.
Judge Terry Doughty, chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the
Western District of Louisiana in his 155-page ruling described the Biden >>> administrations efforts to push social media platforms into doing its
censorship the most massive attack against free speech in United
States history. But Joes justice doesnt see it that way at all. In
another exchange, Jackson argued that a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic or >>> other declared emergencies should allow the always well-meaning
government expand constitutional limits. You know, like Woodrow Wilson
locking up dissenters during World War I. Biden already has tried to use >>> his emergency powers illicitly, like ordering landlords not to evict
deadbeat tenants, or allowing degree holders to skip their obligations
to pay back loans. Most dictators take over in emergencies, and the
freedom of speech is usually the first right to go.
Im interested in your view that the context doesnt change the First
Amendment principles, Jackson said. I understood our First Amendment
jurisprudence to require heightened scrutiny of government restrictions
of speech, but not necessarily a total prohibition when youre talking
about a compelling interest of the government to ensure, for example,
that the public has accurate information in the context of a
once-in-a-lifetime pandemic.
She actually said that, even though it is now undeniable that the public >>> was given false, deliberately misleading and repeatedly wrong
information by the government (as well as the fearmongering news media). >>> Conservative writer Matt Margolis correctly observed this morning, More >>> often than not, it seems that the speech that the government censored or >>> suppressed turned out to be right in the end.
Naturally, the mainstream media is soft-peddling Justice Jacksons
ominous unmasking as a government censorship advocate. But the public
needs to understand: she stands for and with the party and the President >>> that are claiming only they can save democracy, when it is becoming
increasingly clear that the exact opposite is the truth.
In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
"convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
longer effective.
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ >> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 15:41:48 -0400, HeartQuack AndrewGreat picture!
<b'rissed>https://www.instagram.com/p/Cy3sTCuxtlf/?hl=en
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ >> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
So how are you ?
He's told you a HUNDRED times or more that he's 'wonderfully hungry',
gook. That's a LIE. Just LOOK at hime:
Does that morbidly obese mongoloid look REMOTELY hungry to you, gook?Mangina, I am wonderfully hungry by the power of HaShem the Holy Ghost.
Quack Quack!You are the quack here!
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
An eternally (Mark 3:29) fake-KK(QQ)-nymshifter wrote:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.N. children's agency said on Sunday over
13,000 children have been killed in Gaza in Israel's offensive, adding >>>> many kids were suffering from severe malnutrition and did not "even
have the energy to cry."
This should remind folks that despite the deceased 16yo Markea's small
stature and matching weight of 40 lbs, she did not suffer from severe
malnutrition as evident by her having the energy to run away multiple
times as reported by both DFACS and Police **and** the energy to
confess in her diary that she got sick from eating food she found at
the bottom of a Walmart dumpster.
Very great point!
.Because absolutely ZERO children in Germany and Japan were killed
between 1940 and 1945.../sarc
The only godly way to stop the terrible misbehavior of terrorists, who
are always and invariably hangry (2 Kings 6:29), is to "convince it
forward" (John 15:12) for them to be wonderfully hungry (Philippians
4:12) instead. If they refuse, then it would be right to imprison them
for their own safety as well as the safety of others. If they can't
because they're eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned as in the example of
LoosePeeledQuackIdiot fake-KK(QQ)-nymshifter et al in this thread, we
pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse (Jeremiah 17:5)
them so that they whither away harmlessly as all are witnessing to
their wonder and amazement here on USENET
A firing squad is fine for me.
Of course, the Romans had crucifixion.
HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:<FLUSH NIGGER AND GOOK NONSENSE>
https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/03/19/heluva-scotus-choice-there-joe/
Heluva SCOTUS Choice There, Joe!
MARCH 19, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
I am wonderfully hungry!
Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ >> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
So how are you ?
Michael
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:10:47 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoNithing, Christian theology teaches that HaShem is three distinct
Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'LOL! Gook, the supersded jew g-d haShit (Piss Be Upon him) which you
Does that morbidly obese mongoloid look REMOTELY hungry to you, gook?Mangina, I am wonderfully hungry by the power of HaShem the Holy Ghost.
worship never HAD a Trinity.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
An eternally (Mark 3:29) fake-KK(QQ)-nymshifter wrote:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.N. children's agency said on Sunday over
13,000 children have been killed in Gaza in Israel's offensive, adding >>>> many kids were suffering from severe malnutrition and did not "even
have the energy to cry."
This should remind folks that despite the deceased 16yo Markea's small
stature and matching weight of 40 lbs, she did not suffer from severe
malnutrition as evident by her having the energy to run away multiple
times as reported by both DFACS and Police **and** the energy to
confess in her diary that she got sick from eating food she found at
the bottom of a Walmart dumpster.
Very great point!
.Because absolutely ZERO children in Germany and Japan were killed
between 1940 and 1945.../sarc
The only godly way to stop the terrible misbehavior of terrorists, who
are always and invariably hangry (2 Kings 6:29), is to "convince it
forward" (John 15:12) for them to be wonderfully hungry (Philippians
4:12) instead. If they refuse, then it would be right to imprison them
for their own safety as well as the safety of others. If they can't
because they're eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned as in the example of
LoosePeeledQuackIdiot fake-KK(QQ)-nymshifter et al in this thread, we
pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse (Jeremiah 17:5)
them so that they whither away harmlessly as all are witnessing to
their wonder and amazement here on USENET
A firing squad is fine for me.
Of course, the Romans had crucifixion.
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:31:07 -0700, NOT Michael EjercitoGod can not be superseded.
Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'You can't POSSIBLY still be hungry: just LOOK at yourself you fat
LOL! Gook, the supersded jew g-d haShit (Piss Be Upon him) which youNithing, Christian theology teaches that HaShem is three distinct
worship never HAD a Trinity.
Persons- the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost; each Person is fully God. >> So I am indeed wonderfully hungry by the power of the Holy Ghost,
who is HaShem.
Asiatic turd: https://www.instagram.com/p/Cy3sTCuxtlf/?hl=en
And the Holy Ghost got[sic][SIC!!! LOL] NOTHING to do with any
susperseded jew g-d, gook.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
An eternally (Mark 3:29) fake-KK(QQ)-nymshifter wrote:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.N. children's agency said on Sunday over
13,000 children have been killed in Gaza in Israel's offensive, adding >>>> many kids were suffering from severe malnutrition and did not "even
have the energy to cry."
This should remind folks that despite the deceased 16yo Markea's small
stature and matching weight of 40 lbs, she did not suffer from severe
malnutrition as evident by her having the energy to run away multiple
times as reported by both DFACS and Police **and** the energy to
confess in her diary that she got sick from eating food she found at
the bottom of a Walmart dumpster.
Very great point!
.Because absolutely ZERO children in Germany and Japan were killed
between 1940 and 1945.../sarc
The only godly way to stop the terrible misbehavior of terrorists, who
are always and invariably hangry (2 Kings 6:29), is to "convince it
forward" (John 15:12) for them to be wonderfully hungry (Philippians
4:12) instead. If they refuse, then it would be right to imprison them
for their own safety as well as the safety of others. If they can't
because they're eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned as in the example of
LoosePeeledQuackIdiot fake-KK(QQ)-nymshifter et al in this thread, we
pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse (Jeremiah 17:5)
them so that they whither away harmlessly as all are witnessing to
their wonder and amazement here on USENET
A firing squad is fine for me.
Of course, the Romans had crucifixion.
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Michael Ejercito wrote:
An eternally (Mark 3:29) fake-KK(QQ)-nymshifter wrote:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.N. children's agency said on Sunday over
13,000 children have been killed in Gaza in Israel's offensive, adding >>>> many kids were suffering from severe malnutrition and did not "even
have the energy to cry."
This should remind folks that despite the deceased 16yo Markea's small
stature and matching weight of 40 lbs, she did not suffer from severe
malnutrition as evident by her having the energy to run away multiple
times as reported by both DFACS and Police **and** the energy to
confess in her diary that she got sick from eating food she found at
the bottom of a Walmart dumpster.
Very great point!
.Because absolutely ZERO children in Germany and Japan were killed
between 1940 and 1945.../sarc
The only godly way to stop the terrible misbehavior of terrorists, who
are always and invariably hangry (2 Kings 6:29), is to "convince it
forward" (John 15:12) for them to be wonderfully hungry (Philippians
4:12) instead. If they refuse, then it would be right to imprison them
for their own safety as well as the safety of others. If they can't
because they're eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned as in the example of
LoosePeeledQuackIdiot fake-KK(QQ)-nymshifter et al in this thread, we
pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that GOD continues to curse (Jeremiah 17:5)
them so that they whither away harmlessly as all are witnessing to
their wonder and amazement here on USENET
A firing squad is fine for me.
Of course, the Romans had crucifixion.
(Ketanji) 03/27/24 Again ever more cursed by GOD ...
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/euYDQU1X4Fo/m/C4REuDM-AAAJ
HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
(Ketanji) 03/27/24 Again ever more cursed by GOD ...
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/euYDQU1X4Fo/m/C4REuDM-AAAJ
This is tragic!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 302 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 121:31:21 |
| Calls: | 6,769 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,299 |
| Messages: | 5,376,787 |
| Posted today: | 2 |