• QUINTIC BY RADICALS

    From bassam karzeddin@21:1/5 to bassam karzeddin on Thu Jul 2 09:09:39 2020
    On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 10:50:01 PM UTC+3, bassam karzeddin wrote:
    As if the mathematician could truly make completely even the solution of the Quadratic equation only (without mixing it with fictions), wonder!

    So funny, really the achievements of mathematickers

    BKK

    And even this thread was quite long and started in 2004 AS I DO remember on that math forum at Drexel

    Can anyone find it please and provide that link, since so much happening since that date in the same old issue where Google is never concerned about any documents written and published by them nor any true guard for anything meaningful but a purely
    profitable dumb machine operated by TROLLS?

    Bassam Karzeddin

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bassam karzeddin@21:1/5 to bassam karzeddin on Thu Jul 2 08:53:56 2020
    On Wednesday, February 28, 2018 at 10:53:44 AM UTC+3, bassam karzeddin wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 10:50:01 PM UTC+3, bassam karzeddin wrote:
    As if the mathematician could truly make completely even the solution of the Quadratic equation only (without mixing it with fictions), wonder!

    So funny, really the achievements of mathematickers

    BKK

    To see the simplest form solution (just before they delete it) of coefficients (a = b = 1), and c= - 1, the following general trinomial of n'th degree

    (x^n + x^m = 1)

    https://mathoverflow.net/questions/208169/quintic-equation


    Only for interested people for coming bigger facts in this issue

    Note that old formula of mine was deleted by same moderators in the above link ON Stalk Exchange and also from many other links in their sites (probably around 15 times) for NO SPOKEN REASON SO FAR

    Where I could manage to republish it again in their site here

    https://hsm.stackexchange.com/questions/3045/who-was-the-first-to-show-that-this-quintic-equation-has-five-radical-roots

    Where also, this link is going soon to disappear for many untold reasons (as always as usual)

    So, interested keen specialists or researchers are kindly advised to store it or print it and keep it for themselves (it is a half-page valid formula)
    for future serious development just before they get notice and delete permanently again and again for no mentioned reason as you can see presently from that topic

    With one note that real existing roots occur in rare cases that when (n = 2m), and (m is a power of two)

    Otherwise, the only approximation for no existing real root (except in human minds)

    If can you guess the truer reason for that stubborn insistence of deletion of my formula, it would be so nice and well-appreciated to talk about your expectation openly here for sure

    Regards

    Bassam Karzeddin



    This had been made in the standard known mathematics and long ago (1986), with documented references and letters

    But it seems that it is only more interesting to mathematicians when (n = 2, and, m = 1), wonder!

    Any reference research of alike results from 1990 on words, please

    Thanks and Regards

    Bassam King Karzeddin
    Feb. 28th, 2018

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)