Hello,
More of my philosophy about the effectiveness of mathematics and about Elon Musk and about education and about Nelson Mandela and about mathematics and more ..
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ , so i have just discussed the mathematical philosophical question of: is mathematics discovered or invented ?, read
it in my below thoughts, but the other important question to ask in mathematical philosophy is:
Why mathematics is so effective ?
So i think that i am discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence that says to me that mathematics is like the french language that is constructed from letters and words so that to model the meaning of our thoughts,
so i think that mathematics is the same , it is like a language that is constructed from the low level layers of axioms etc. , so then after that
the language of mathematics that we obtain becomes effective since we
are also logically inferring it from our smartness by discovering from the universe and inventing ideals like the real numbers that permit to model correctly reality.
I have just looked at the following video of Elon Musk about education and
he is saying that there is no need even to have a college degree at all ,
even high school, and i think that he is making the same mistake
as the Nelson Mandela saying below, i mean that you have also to follow the way of prevention by minimizing at best the defects or the making the errors or the making the mistakes by having a college degree or by having a high school degree , so i invite
you to read my following thoughts about the Nelson Mandela saying so that you understand my views, and i invite you to look at the following video of Elon Musk so that to notice his mistake:
Elon Musk’s Incredible Speech on the Education System | Eye Opening Video on Education
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNQDp3v-VGE
So i have just looked at the following video of Nelson Mandela, and i invite you to look at it:
Nelson Mandela: Inspiring wisdom for a brighter world
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9KAtEBGMRw
So notice carefully that Nelson Mandela is saying the following in the above video:
"Do not judge me by my successes,
but judge me by how many times
I fell down and got back up again."
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ , and i think that the above saying of Nelson Mandela from the above video of Nelson Mandela is not smart, since
Nelson Mandela in the above saying is not saying that you have to be good prevention from making the errors or from the falling down so that to be successful. And notice that the being good prevention is also the being successful, so i say that the
general way is the way of good prevention that minimizes at best the making errors or the falling down before making the success of like for example the "got back up again" , and the good prevention is also the good education and the good experience that
makes you smart.
So notice above that i am giving the right "model" that is creative and it is the following:
"So i say that the general way is the way of good prevention that minimizes at best the making errors or the falling down before making the success of like for example the "got back up again"."
So notice carefully that my model above is creative, since the being good prevention is also the being well equipped with resilience and with the good education and with the good experience etc., and notice that the being good prevention is minimizing at
best the making the errors or mistakes, and the being good prevention is also recursively , in the way to the goal , making the mistakes that are minimized at best and learning from them.
I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i mean that it is "above" 115 IQ , so in philosophical mathematics, i can ask a question of: Is mathematics invented or discovered ?, so i think it
is both , since our universe has been tuned from the infinite multiple universes, so we can discover patterns in it of mathematics, since i say the following:
So i think that our universe is an evolutionary process, i mean that it is a random process , but it is not just a random process , since the random process is the "infinite" universes that have processed in like "Parallelly" and "Serially" and "Semi-
Parallelly" in groups of a number of universes, by combining in a kind of manner, so that to create our tuned universe, and the Parallelly is like in parallel programming that accelerates much more the process of creating our tuned universe or other
tuned universes like ours, and the "tuned" means that we are also discovering mathematics as patterns .
But since i also say that since it is also idealized in mathematics, since i for example think that real numbers is an ideal , i mean that it permits to measure since the real numbers between 0 and 1 are infinite, so real numbers is like the ideal or like the general way to measure in a realistic manner, so we can say that
mathematics can also be invented , so i can finally conclude that mathematics is both invented and discovered.
And i have just looked at the following video of Monte Carlo Simulation, and i invite you to look at it, and my answer to this video is just below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ESK5SaP-bc
So i think that the above video is not so smart, since i am discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence in the above video, so the first important pattern that i am discovering is that when you want for example to find the average height of people
world wide as is saying it the above video, so you have by logical analogy to look at the people world wide like a dice game, i mean even if the people distribution of height of the world is mixed up, it is by logical analogy like a dice, i mean that
they are distributed with a weight that we call height , so when you select randomly a person , you are like, by logical analogy, playing at a dice game, so the selected person has a weight of height from the distribution that looks, by logical analogy,
like a dice, so now you are understanding that when you select randomly more and more persons until for example 10000 persons, it will have the tendency to well approximate the distribution of all the heights of all the people around the world, so i also
say that we have to select randomly since, by logical analogy, we have like to play at for example the game of dice "randomly".
And so that to know my other pattern that i have just discovered with my fluid intelligence that explains the logical implication in mathematical logic, you can read my thoughts about it in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/yEMTeWhBmQA
So i have just looked at the following video about Leadership from a known psychologist that is called Jordan Peterson, i invite you to look at it:
The Importance of Character in Leadership | Jordan Peterson
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMzSiLUckjY
But i think that the above video is not smart, since it is not knowing how to define correctly good leadership, so i will now discover important patterns with my fluid intelligence so that to define correctly what is good leadership, and here are the
important patterns:
So we have to ask if efficiency can model reliability, so i think efficiency can model reliability since "efficiency" refers to the extent to which a system, process, or device can perform a given task or function with minimal waste of resources, time, energy, or cost, and since minimizing at best the cost in efficiency is also
that redundancy, fault tolerance mechanisms, failure analysis, risk assessment, and preventive maintenance practices all minimize the cost of bugs or errors, so they can be modeled with efficiency too, so i say that efficiency can model both reliability
and performance, so then so that to define good leadership we have to say that it has to be modeled with performance and reliability, since in good Leadership you have to maximize at best performance and maximize at best reliability, so then since
efficiency can model both performance and reliability, so then we can say that good leadership is maximizing at best efficiency.
So here is my new question to ChatGPT so that you understand more:
"But availability, scalability, maintainability, security, and compliance can be categorized that they bring performance, it is why we can say that quality can be measured with both performance and reliability"
And ChatGPT has just answered me the following:
"You are absolutely right, and I apologize for any confusion. The factors I mentioned earlier—availability, scalability, maintainability, security, and compliance—are indeed integral to a system's performance and contribute to overall system quality.
In that sense, we can say that quality can be measured with both performance and reliability, encompassing the broader set of attributes that define a system's effectiveness, efficiency, and dependability.
To summarize, performance and reliability are two essential pillars for measuring system quality, but they are not standalone measures. They encompass a range of factors, including availability, scalability, maintainability, security, and compliance,
which collectively contribute to a system's overall quality and value. Evaluating all these attributes provides a comprehensive assessment of how well the system meets its objectives and user expectations, ensuring a holistic understanding of the system'
s capabilities and limitations."
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)