Period of megacycle 429.4 Ma is taken from reference 1.
Megacycles
(4620 - 4390 Ma)
4390 - 4190 Ma
4190 - 3960 Ma
3960 - 3760 Ma
3760 - 3540 Ma
3540 - 3330 Ma
3330 - 3110 Ma
3110 - 2900 Ma
2900 - 2680 Ma
2680 - 2470 Ma
2470 - 2250 Ma
2250 - 2040 Ma
2040 - 1820 Ma
1820 - 1620 Ma
1620 - 1390 Ma
1390 - 1190 Ma
1190 - 970 Ma
970 - 760 Ma
760 - 540 Ma
540 - 340 Ma
340 - 130 Ma
130 -
(Earth's age is approximated to be between about 4570 - 4450 Ma).
Approximately same set is achieved if one takes starting point
about 2680 Ma for breakup of the Pilbara continent ref. 2) and
then if one adds to this number 2680 Ma periodically
429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma uppwads of the list and secondly if one
subracts from this number 2680 Ma periodically 429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma downwards of the list.
(I put below misc references of Kapez B and Krapez B et al about the subject. I'am not sure about existence of 2nd and 3rd order of cyclicities
proposed by Krapez B and also I do not agreee his about period of
about 360 Ma. Also some causes of 2nd order and 3rd order cylicities are questionable in my opinion.)
References:
1. Poropudas Hannu, 1996.
Harrastelijan ajatuksia päivän, kuukauden ja vuoden pituudesta
muinaisina aikoina.
GEOLOGI 48, 4-5/1996, 92-96.
2. Kapez B, Eisenlohr B, 1998.
Precambrian Research, vol. 88. Pages 173-205, (2680 Ma on page 204).
3. Krapez B, 1993.
Precambrian Research, vol. 60. Pages 1-45.
4. Krapez B, 1996.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 43. Pages 355-380.
5. Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 1-36.
6. Horowitz R C and Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 879-886.
7. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 71-87.
8. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 89-103.
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
Kolamäentie 9E
Kiiminki / Oulu
Finland
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 10:52:31 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
Period of megacycle 429.4 Ma is taken from reference 1.
Megacycles
(4620 - 4390 Ma)
4390 - 4190 Ma
4190 - 3960 Ma
3960 - 3760 Ma
3760 - 3540 Ma
3540 - 3330 Ma
3330 - 3110 Ma
3110 - 2900 Ma
2900 - 2680 Ma
2680 - 2470 Ma
2470 - 2250 Ma
2250 - 2040 Ma
2040 - 1820 Ma
1820 - 1620 Ma
1620 - 1390 Ma
1390 - 1190 Ma
1190 - 970 Ma
970 - 760 Ma
760 - 540 Ma
540 - 340 Ma
340 - 130 Ma
130 -
(Earth's age is approximated to be between about 4570 - 4450 Ma).
Approximately same set is achieved if one takes starting point
about 2680 Ma for breakup of the Pilbara continent ref. 2) and
then if one adds to this number 2680 Ma periodically
429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma uppwads of the list and secondly if one
subracts from this number 2680 Ma periodically 429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma downwards of the list.
(I put below misc references of Kapez B and Krapez B et al about the subject.
I'am not sure about existence of 2nd and 3rd order of cyclicities
proposed by Krapez B and also I do not agreee his about period of
about 360 Ma. Also some causes of 2nd order and 3rd order cylicities are questionable in my opinion.)
References:
1. Poropudas Hannu, 1996.
Harrastelijan ajatuksia päivän, kuukauden ja vuoden pituudesta
muinaisina aikoina.
GEOLOGI 48, 4-5/1996, 92-96.
2. Kapez B, Eisenlohr B, 1998.
Precambrian Research, vol. 88. Pages 173-205, (2680 Ma on page 204).
3. Krapez B, 1993.
Precambrian Research, vol. 60. Pages 1-45.
4. Krapez B, 1996.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 43. Pages 355-380.
5. Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 1-36.
6. Horowitz R C and Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 879-886.
7. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 71-87.
8. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 89-103.
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
Kolamäentie 9E
Kiiminki / Oulu
Finland
References:
1. Poropudas Hannu, 1996.
Harrastelijan ajatuksia päivän, kuukauden ja vuoden pituudesta
muinaisina aikoina.
GEOLOGI 48, 4-5/1996, 92-96.
http://elektra.helsinki.fi/se/g/0046-5720/48/4-5/harraste.pdf
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's- näytä lainattu teksti -
fossil time data ---------------------------------------------------------------------------¬---------------------------------------------
<533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1...@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
sci.bio.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,
sci.math.
Sat, 13 Dec 2008, 10 pages.
(I have drawn four extrapolated figures (0-1200 Ma, days/year, 0-4600
Ma, days/year,
0-1200 Ma days/month, 0-4600 Ma, days/month) but unfortunately they
are not possible
to give here due this text is in ASCII-format. I could send them via
email by request.
My email address:
hanporop
(at)
luukku.com )
On Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 1:45:31 PM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 10:52:31 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
Period of megacycle 429.4 Ma is taken from reference 1.
Megacycles
(4620 - 4390 Ma)
4390 - 4190 Ma
4190 - 3960 Ma
3960 - 3760 Ma
3760 - 3540 Ma
3540 - 3330 Ma
3330 - 3110 Ma
3110 - 2900 Ma
2900 - 2680 Ma
2680 - 2470 Ma
2470 - 2250 Ma
2250 - 2040 Ma
2040 - 1820 Ma
1820 - 1620 Ma
1620 - 1390 Ma
1390 - 1190 Ma
1190 - 970 Ma
970 - 760 Ma
760 - 540 Ma
540 - 340 Ma
340 - 130 Ma
130 -
(Earth's age is approximated to be between about 4570 - 4450 Ma).
Approximately same set is achieved if one takes starting point
about 2680 Ma for breakup of the Pilbara continent ref. 2) and
then if one adds to this number 2680 Ma periodically
429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma uppwads of the list and secondly if one
subracts from this number 2680 Ma periodically 429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma downwards of the list.
(I put below misc references of Kapez B and Krapez B et al about the subject.
I'am not sure about existence of 2nd and 3rd order of cyclicities proposed by Krapez B and also I do not agreee his about period of
about 360 Ma. Also some causes of 2nd order and 3rd order cylicities are questionable in my opinion.)
References:
1. Poropudas Hannu, 1996.
Harrastelijan ajatuksia päivän, kuukauden ja vuoden pituudesta muinaisina aikoina.
GEOLOGI 48, 4-5/1996, 92-96.
2. Kapez B, Eisenlohr B, 1998.
Precambrian Research, vol. 88. Pages 173-205, (2680 Ma on page 204).
3. Krapez B, 1993.
Precambrian Research, vol. 60. Pages 1-45.
4. Krapez B, 1996.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 43. Pages 355-380.
5. Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 1-36.
6. Horowitz R C and Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 879-886.
7. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 71-87.
8. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 89-103.
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
Kolamäentie 9E
Kiiminki / Oulu
Finland
References:
1. Poropudas Hannu, 1996.
Harrastelijan ajatuksia päivän, kuukauden ja vuoden pituudesta
muinaisina aikoina.
GEOLOGI 48, 4-5/1996, 92-96.
http://elektra.helsinki.fi/se/g/0046-5720/48/4-5/harraste.pdf
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52ca9eb0-4d5a-4a5d-8c99-57d7444b8da0@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps Earth and
Moon formed as a planet couple ?
From: Hannu Poropudas <hanp...@luukku.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 06:53:44 +0000
(----COPY BELOW----)
Linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps Earth and Moon formed as a planet couple ?
2 posts by 2 authors
me (Hannu Poropudas change)
Apr 27
How to calculate with my extrapolated fossil data of Pannella G.:
T’ = length of the month recorded by marine life (= synodic month)
t’ = length of the day recorded by marine life (= solar day)
T = length of sidereal month
t = length of sidereal day
T = T’ /(1+T’/Y)
t = t’ /(1+t’/Y), this is very nearly equal to t’
S = T’ / t’ = number of days in month recorded in paleontological specimens.
Y = length of the year (= tropical year, this is assumed to be constant = 365,2422 days = not changed significantly)
Reference:
Runcorn, S. K., 1970.
Paleontological Measurements of the Changes in the Rotation Rates of Earth and Moon and
of the Rate of Retreat of the Moon from the Earth., pages 17-23, page 21. In:
Runcorn S.K. (Editor), 1970.
Paleogeophysics.
Academic Press Inc., Printed in Great Britain, 518 pages, pages 17-23.
For example
(figures from my drawings one example out of range of experimental
test points for curiosity):
-4600*10^4 centuries (approx.. Earth’s formation time, 4600 Ma ago)
11 hours/day (present hours, assumption Earth and Sun distance have not significantly changed, Y = 365,2422 days, solar days and tropical year)
Y = 780 * 11 h = 8580 h (present hours) = 357,5 days (present solar days, Y changed little (?) in data of tables it is used Y=365,2422 days)
780 days/year (solar days and tropical year)
48 days/month (solar days and synodic month) = T’
T = T’ /(1+T’/Y) = 48 / (1 + 48/357,5) = 42,31812577 =
= approx. 42 days/sidereal month
Distance approximately between Earth and Moon at approx. 4600 Ma ago.
G = 6,67*10^(-11)*N*m^^2/kg^2
M = 5,974*10^24 kg
P = 42,31812577*11*60*60 s (present seconds) = 1675797,781 s
r = ( G*M*P^2/(4*Pi^2) )^()1/3 = 304832464,1 m =
= approx. 305000 km.
So linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps
Earth and Moon formed as a planet couple ?
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
_________________COPIES OF MY OLD ARTICLES BELOW (long)_________________
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
1 kirjoittajan 2 viestiä
mathematician
13.12.2008
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki,
Finland, Date: 12.12.2008)
Three rough data set (TABLE 1, days/month, TABLE 2, days/year and
TABLE 3, months/year)
are given in this paper for test purposes of ancient fossil time data. Numbers are based
on Giorgio Pannella’s (1972) fossil time data. Interpretations are my
own.
These linear extrapolations are based also on uncertain assumption of existence of
oscillation about 429.4 Ma in Pannella’s Figure 3 (days/month). Many
ages and fossil
points are still uncertain. Main intended area of use of these figures
is about 0-2000 Ma.
Tables of fossil time data
TABLE 1
-T/10^4 Days/Month
centuries
----------------------------
0 29,16
18,6 29,4
31,4 29,69
45,4 29,83
58,1 30,05
74,4 29,95
206,9 29,67
291,9 30,09
342,2 30,36
380,3 30,57
416,7 30,55
429,4 30,98
448 31,22
460,8 31,51
467,6 31,24
474,8 31,65
487,5 31,87
503,8 31,77
639 31,49
721,3 31,91
771,6 32,18
809,7 32,39
846,1 32,37
858,8 32,81
877,4 33,05
890,2 33,34
897 33,06
904,2 33,48
916,9 33,7
933,2 33,6
1068,4 33,32
1150,7 33,74
1201 34,01
1239,1 34,22
1275,5 34,2
1288,2 34,63
1306,8 34,87
1319,6 35,16
1326,4 34,89
1333,6 35,3
1346,3 35,52
1362,6 35,42
1497,8 35,14
1580,1 35,56
1630,4 35,83
1668,5 36,04
1704,9 36,02
1717,6 36,46
1736,2 36,7
1749 36,99
1755,8 36,71
1763 37,13
1775,7 37,35
1792 37,25
1927,2 36,97
2009,5 37,39
-----------------------
2059,8 37,66
2097,9 37,87
2134,3 37,85
2147 38,28
2165,6 38,52
2178,4 38,81
2185,2 38,54
2192,4 38,95
2205,1 39,17
2221,4 39,07
2356,6 38,79
2438,9 39,21
2489,2 39,48
2527,3 39,69
2563,7 39,67
2576,4 40,11
2595 40,35
2607,8 40,64
2614,6 40,36
2621,8 40,78
2634,5 41
2650,8 40,9
2786 40,62
2868,3 41,04
2918,6 41,31
2956,7 41,52
2993,1 41,5
3005,8 41,93
3024,4 42,17
3037,2 42,46
3044 42,19
3051,2 42,6
3063,9 42,82
3080,2 42,72
3215,4 42,44
3297,7 42,86
3348 43,13
3386,1 43,34
3422,5 43,32
3435,2 43,76
3453,8 44
3466,6 44,29
3473,4 44,01
3480,6 44,43
3493,3 44,65
3509,6 44,55
3644,8 44,27
3727,1 44,69
3777,4 44,96
3815,5 45,17
-----------------------
3851,9 45,15
3864,6 45,58
3883,2 45,82
3896 46,11
3902,8 45,84
3910 46,25
3922,7 46,47
3939 46,37
4074,2 46,09
4156,5 46,51
4206,8 46,78
4244,9 46,99
4281,3 46,97
4294 47,41
4312,6 47,65
4325,4 47,94
4332,2 47,66
4339,4 48,08
4352,1 48,3
4368,4 48,2
4503,6 47,92
-----------------------
(4585,9 48,34
4636,2 48,61
4674,3 48,82
4710,7 48,8
4761,6 49,49)
TABLE 2
-T/10^4 Days/Year
centuries
---------------------------
0 364,76
52,2 370,95
52,2 374,76
226,2 370,95
276,9 381,46
276,9 391,22
335,6 393,66
340,2 397,56
340,2 400,16
367,8 400,65
367,8 404,52
367,8 412,26
394,5 400,65
408,2 418,06
429,4 404,09
435,8 413,23
445 424
481,6 410,28
481,6 414,09
558,1 431,76
655,6 410,28
706,3 420,79
706,3 430,55
765 432,99
769,6 436,89
769,6 439,49
797,2 439,98
797,2 443,85
797,2 451,59
823,9 439,98
837,6 457,39
858,8 443,42
865,2 452,56
874,4 463,33
911 449,61
911 453,42
987,5 471,09
1085 449,61
1135,7 460,12
1135,7 469,88
1194,4 472,32
1199 476,22
1199 478,82
1226,6 479,31
1226,6 483,18
1226,6 490,92
1253,3 479,31
1267 496,72
1288,2 482,75
1294,6 491,89
1303,8 502,66
1340,4 488,94
1340,4 492,75
1416,9 510,42
1514,4 488,94
1565,1 499,45
1565,1 509,21
1623,8 511,65
1628,4 515,55
1628,4 518,15
1656 518,64
1656 522,51
1656 530,25
1682,7 518,64
1696,4 536,05
1717,6 522,08
1724 531,22
1733,2 541,99
1769,8 528,27
1769,8 532,08
1846,3 549,75
1943,8 528,27
1994,5 538,78
1994,5 548,54
-------------------------
2053,2 550,98
2057,8 554,88
2057,8 557,48
2085,4 557,97
2085,4 561,84
2085,4 569,58
2112,1 557,97
2125,8 575,38
2147 561,41
2153,4 570,55
2162,6 581,32
2199,2 567,6
2199,2 571,41
2275,7 589,08
2373,2 567,6
2423,9 578,11
2423,9 587,87
2482,6 590,31
2487,2 594,21
2487,2 596,81
2514,8 597,3
2514,8 601,17
2514,8 608,91
2541,5 597,3
2555,2 614,71
2576,4 600,75
2582,8 609,88
2592 620,65
2628,6 606,94
2628,6 610,75
2705,1 628,41
2802,6 606,94
2853,3 617,45
2853,3 627,21
2912 629,65
2916,6 633,55
2916,6 636,15
2944,2 636,64
2944,2 640,51
2944,2 648,25
2970,9 636,64
2984,6 654,05
3005,8 640,08
3012,2 649,22
3021,4 659,99
3058 646,27
3058 650,08
3134,5 667,75
3232 646,27
3282,7 656,78
3282,7 666,54
3341,4 668,98
3346 672,88
3346 675,48
3373,6 675,97
3373,6 679,84
3373,6 687,58
3400,3 675,97
3414 693,38
3435,2 679,41
3441,6 688,55
3450,8 699,32
3487,4 685,6
3487,4 689,41
3563,9 707,08
3661,4 685,6
3712,1 696,11
3712,1 705,87
3770,8 708,31
3775,4 712,21
3775,4 714,81
3803 715,3
3803 719,17
3803 726,91
-------------------------
3829,7 715,3
3843,4 732,71
3864,6 718,74
3871 727,88
3880,2 738,65
3916,8 724,93
3916,8 728,74
3993,3 746,41
4090,8 724,93
4141,5 735,44
4141,5 745,2
4200,2 747,64
4204,8 751,54
4204,8 754,14
4232,4 754,63
4232,4 758,5
4232,4 766,24
4259,1 754,63
4272,8 772,04
4294 758,07
4300,4 767,21
4309,6 777,98
4346,2 764,26
4346,2 768,07
4422,7 785,74
4520,2 764,26
-------------------------
(4570,9 774,77
4570,9 784,53
4629,6 786,97
4634,2 790,87
4634,2 793,47
4661,8 793,96
4661,8 797,83
4661,8 805,57
4688,5 793,96
4702,2 811,37
4723,4 797,4
4729,8 806,54
4739 817,31
4775,6 803,59
4775,6 807,4
4852,1 825,07)
TABLE 3
-T/10^4 Months/Year
centuries
------------------------------
0 12,34
70 12,49
70 12,6
160,7 11,56
220 12,55
290 12,71
340 13,11
360 12,93
360 13,35
429,4 12,95
499,4 13,1
499,4 13,21
510 13
590,1 12,17
649,4 13,16
719,4 13,32
769,4 13,72
789,4 13,54
789,4 13,96
858,8 13,56
928,8 13,71
928,8 13,82
939,4 13,61
1019,5 12,78
1078,8 13,77
1148,8 13,93
1198,8 14,33
1218,8 14,15
1218,8 14,57
1288,2 14,17
1358,2 14,32
1358,2 14,43
1368,8 14,22
1448,9 13,39
1508,2 14,38
1578,2 14,54
1628,2 14,94
1648,2 14,76
1648,2 15,18
1717,6 14,78
1787,6 14,93
1787,6 15,04
1798,2 14,83
1878,3 14
1937,6 14,99
2007,6 15,15
------------------------
2057,6 15,55
2077,6 15,37
2077,6 15,79
2147 15,39
2217 15,54
2217 15,65
2227,6 15,44
2307,7 14,61
2367 15,6
2437 15,76
2487 16,16
2507 15,98
2507 16,4
2576,4 16
2646,4 16,15
2646,4 16,26
2657 16,05
2737,1 15,22
2796,4 16,21
2866,4 16,37
2916,4 16,77
2936,4 16,59
2936,4 17,01
3005,8 16,61
3075,8 16,76
3075,8 16,87
3086,4 16,66
3166,5 15,83
3225,8 16,82
3295,8 16,98
3345,8 17,38
3365,8 17,2
3365,8 17,62
3435,2 17,22
3505,2 17,37
3505,2 17,48
3515,8 17,27
3595,9 16,44
3655,2 17,43
3725,2 17,59
3775,2 17,99
3795,2 17,81
3795,2 18,23
------------------------
3864,6 17,83
3934,6 17,98
3934,6 18,09
3945,2 17,88
4025,3 17,05
4084,6 18,04
4154,6 18,2
4204,6 18,6
4224,6 18,42
4224,6 18,84
4294 18,44
4364 18,59
4364 18,7
4374,6 18,49
4454,7 17,66
4514 18,65
-----------------------
(4584 18,81
4634 19,21
4654 19,03
4654 19,45
4723,4 19,05
4793,4 19,2
4793,4 19,31
4804 19,1
4884,1 18,27
4943,4 19,26)
References:
Pannella Giorgio, 1972.
Paleontological Evidence on the Earth’s Rotational History Since Early Precambrian.
Astrophysics and Space Science, 16, (1972), 212-237.
(Figure 3 on page 235 and Figure 4 on page 236. Mean solar day,
Synodic Month, Tropical Year.
Exact age of sedimentation of the Gunflint Formation is 1878.3+-1.3
Ma, YPM-IP-28510/28511.)
Scrutton, C.T., (1964), 1965.
Periodicity in Devonian Coral Growth.
Paleontology, volume 7, part 4, pages 552-558, plates 86-87.
(Middle Devonian OUM DT2 fossil, age is 385.3 Ma – 397.5 Ma, GT2004, approximate linear formula 12.37 – 1.43*10^(-7)*T, months/year, T=centuries,
past time minus signed).
Scrutton, C.T., 1970.
Evidence for a monthly periodicity in the growth of some corals.
In:
Runcorn, S.K. (editor), 1970.
Paleogeophysics. Academic Press, London, pages 11-16.
Fralick, P., Davis, D.W., Kissin, S.A., 2002.
The age of the Gunflint Formation, Ontario, Canada: single zircon U-Pb
age determinations
from reworked volcanic ash.
Can. J. Earth Sci., 39, 1085-1091.
From: mathematician <haporopu@luukku.com>
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:46:50 +0000 (UTC)
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's fossil time data
1 kirjoittajan 2 viestiä
mathematician
14.1.2009
Muut vastaanottajat: george....@adelaide.edu.au
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's
fossil time data ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Author: H.K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki, Finland.
Date: 13.1.2009)
Below are few rough estimations of ancient time data. It should be remembered that
these linear extrapolations are based on my uncertain assumption of existence of
oscillation of period 429.4 Ma in Pannella's figure 3 (reference 2)
and ages
and data of fossils and stromatolites are in many cases uncertain
too.
The Elatina Formation and Reynella Siltstone -----------------------------------------------------------------
620 Ma:
-----------
655.6 Ma, 410.28 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give roughly approx. 412 days/year)
639 Ma, 31.49 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give roughly approx. 31.7 days/month) 410.28/31.49 = 13.03 months/year, (primary value = 13.1 +-0.1 months/
year)
649.4 Ma, 13.16 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(primary value = 13.1 +-0.1 months/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 412/31.7 = 13.0 months/year)
(13.0-13.2 months/year)
The Big Cottonwood Formation
--------------------------------------------
900 Ma:
-----------
890.2 Ma, 33.34 days/month
897 Ma, 33.06 days/month
904.2 Ma, 33.48 days/month
(33-33.5 days/month, average = 33.29 days/month)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 33.4 days/month)
874.4 Ma, 463.33 days/year
911 Ma, 449.61 days/year
911 Ma, 453.42 days/year
(450-463 days/year, average = 455.45 days/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 451 days/year)
455.45/33.29 = 13.68 months/year, (primary value 13.5 months/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 451/33.4 = 13.5 months/year)
928.8 Ma, 13.71 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
928.8 Ma, 13.82 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(13.7-13.8 months/year, primary value 13.5 months/year)
(13.5-13.8 months/year)
The Weeli Wolli Formation
--------------------------------------
2450 Ma:
-------------
2438.9 Ma, 39.21 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 39.2 days/month)
2423.9 Ma, 587.87 days/year
2423.9 Ma, 578.11 days/year
(578-588 days/year, average = 582.99 days/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 585 days/year)
582.99/39.21 = 14.87 months/year, (primary value = 14.5 +-0.5 months/
year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 585/39.2 = 14.9 months/year)
2437 Ma, 15.76 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(primary value = 14.5 +-0.5 months/year)
(14.9-15.8 months/year)
Reference (1).
The Gunflint Formation
------------------
1878.3 +-1.3 Ma:
------------------------
1927.2 Ma, 36.97 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 37.2 days/month)
1846.3 Ma, 549.75 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 533 days/year)
549.75/36.97 = 14.87 months/year (primary value = 14 months/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 533/37.2 = 14.3 months/year)
1937.6 Ma, 14.99 monnths/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(14.3-15.0 months/year)
Age of the Bulawayan stromatolite UCLA-Bul-7 ? ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mode = 10-20-40, Highest Count = 41.
2576.6.4 Ma, 40.11 days/month
2595 Ma, 40.35 days/month
2607.8 Ma, 40.64 days/month
2614.6 Ma, 40.34 days/month
2621.8 Ma, 40.78 days/month
2634.5 Ma, 41 days/month
2650.8 Ma, 40.9 days/month
2786 Ma, 40.62 days/month
2868.3 Ma, 41.04 days/month
So age of the Bulawayan Stromatolite UCLA-Bul-7 could be:
2580 Ma - 2870 Ma.
(primary value of the age =
(2672 +- 12 Ma - 2715 +- 15 Ma), Upper Bulawayan Group or
(2831 +- 6 Ma - 2904 +- 9 Ma), Lower Bulawayan Group. These both
are not local age determinations from the Bubi Greenstone Belt near
Huntsman Quarries, Zimbabwe.)
Other Time Data for UCLA-Bul-7 stromatolite: -----------------------------------------------------------------
(40-41 days/month, primary value)
(average = 40.5 days/month, primary value)
2576.4 Ma, 600.75 days/year
2582.8 Ma, 609.88 days/year
2592 Ma, 620.65 days/year
2628.6 Ma, 606.94 days/year
2628.6 Ma, 610.75 days/year
2705.1 Ma, 628.41 days/year
2802.6 Ma, 606.94 days/year
2853.3 Ma, 617.45 days/year
2853.3 Ma, 627.21 days/year
2912 Ma, 629.65 days/year
2916.6 Ma, 633.55 days/year
2916.6 Ma, 636.15 days/year
(average = 7428.33/12 = 619.03 = approx. 619 days/year)
(601-636 days/year)
619/40.5 = 15.3 months/year
OUM-DT2 based estimation:
2576.4 Ma, 16 months/year
2646.4 Ma, 16.15 months/year
2646.4 Ma, 16.26 months/year
2657 Ma, 16.05 months/year
2737.1 Ma, 15.22 months/year
2796.4 Ma, 16.21 months/year
2866.4 Ma, 16.37 months/year
2916.4 Ma, 16.77 months/year
(average = 129.03/8 = 16.13 = approx. 16.1 months/year)
(15.2 - 16.8 months/year)
References (2 and 3).
The Moodies Group
----------------------------
3225 Ma:
-------------
3215.4 Ma, 42.44 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure roughly gives approx. 42.8 days/month)
3232 Ma, 646.27 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figure roughly gives approx. 650 days/year)
646.27/42.44 = 15.23 months/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 650/42.8 = 15.2 months/year)
3225.8 Ma, 16.82 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(15.2-16.8 months/year)
Reference (4).
REFERENCES:
1. Williams, G.E. 2000.
Reviews of Geophysics, 38, 1/February 2000, pages 37-59.
2. Pannella, G., 1972.
Astrophysics and Space Science, 16, (1972), 212-237.
3. Fralick,P., Davis,D.W., Kissin,S.A., 2002.
Can. J. Earth Sci., 39, 1085-1091.
4. Eriksson,K.A., Simpson,E.L., Mueller,W., 2006.
Sedimentary Geology 190 (2006), 13-24.
5. Poropudas Hannu, 2009. Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella's Fossil Time Data for Test
Purposes.
<533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com> sci.bio.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,
sci.math.
Sat, 13 Dec 2008, 10 pages.
(I have drawn four extrapolated figures (0-1200 Ma, days/year, 0-4600
Ma, days/year,
0-1200 Ma days/month, 0-4600 Ma, days/month) but unfortunately they
are not possible
to give here due this text is in ASCII-format. I could send them via
email by request.
My email address:
hanporop
(at)
luukku.com )
From: mathematician <haporopu@luukku.com>
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's fossil time data
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <c91312bb-c2b7-4672-8f30-dbcdf1074662@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:52:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: george....@adelaide.edu.au
Re: Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated
Pannella's fossil time data
Hannu Poropudas
21.1.2009
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Earth's Rotational History from Linear
Extarpolation of Pannella's Ancient Time
Data of Fossils
----------------------------------------
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes.
<533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,
sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 9:10:59 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 1:45:31 PM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 10:52:31 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote: >>>> Period of megacycle 429.4 Ma is taken from reference 1.
Megacycles
(4620 - 4390 Ma)
4390 - 4190 Ma
4190 - 3960 Ma
3960 - 3760 Ma
3760 - 3540 Ma
3540 - 3330 Ma
3330 - 3110 Ma
3110 - 2900 Ma
2900 - 2680 Ma
2680 - 2470 Ma
2470 - 2250 Ma
2250 - 2040 Ma
2040 - 1820 Ma
1820 - 1620 Ma
1620 - 1390 Ma
1390 - 1190 Ma
1190 - 970 Ma
970 - 760 Ma
760 - 540 Ma
540 - 340 Ma
340 - 130 Ma
130 -
(Earth's age is approximated to be between about 4570 - 4450 Ma).
Approximately same set is achieved if one takes starting point
about 2680 Ma for breakup of the Pilbara continent ref. 2) and
then if one adds to this number 2680 Ma periodically
429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma uppwads of the list and secondly if one
subracts from this number 2680 Ma periodically 429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma
downwards of the list.
(I put below misc references of Kapez B and Krapez B et al about the subject.
I'am not sure about existence of 2nd and 3rd order of cyclicities
proposed by Krapez B and also I do not agreee his about period of
about 360 Ma. Also some causes of 2nd order and 3rd order cylicities
are questionable in my opinion.)
References:
1. Poropudas Hannu, 1996.
Harrastelijan ajatuksia päivän, kuukauden ja vuoden pituudesta
muinaisina aikoina.
GEOLOGI 48, 4-5/1996, 92-96.
2. Kapez B, Eisenlohr B, 1998.
Precambrian Research, vol. 88. Pages 173-205, (2680 Ma on page 204).
3. Krapez B, 1993.
Precambrian Research, vol. 60. Pages 1-45.
4. Krapez B, 1996.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 43. Pages 355-380.
5. Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 1-36.
6. Horowitz R C and Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 879-886.
7. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 71-87.
8. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 89-103.
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
Kolamäentie 9E
Kiiminki / Oulu
Finland
References:
1. Poropudas Hannu, 1996.
Harrastelijan ajatuksia päivän, kuukauden ja vuoden pituudesta
muinaisina aikoina.
GEOLOGI 48, 4-5/1996, 92-96.
http://elektra.helsinki.fi/se/g/0046-5720/48/4-5/harraste.pdf
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52ca9eb0-4d5a-4a5d-8c99-57d7444b8da0@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps Earth and
Moon formed as a planet couple ?
From: Hannu Poropudas <hanp...@luukku.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 06:53:44 +0000
(----COPY BELOW----)
Linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps Earth and
Moon formed as a planet couple ?
2 posts by 2 authors
me (Hannu Poropudas change)
Apr 27
How to calculate with my extrapolated fossil data of Pannella G.:
T’ = length of the month recorded by marine life (= synodic month)
t’ = length of the day recorded by marine life (= solar day)
T = length of sidereal month
t = length of sidereal day
T = T’ /(1+T’/Y)
t = t’ /(1+t’/Y), this is very nearly equal to t’
S = T’ / t’ = number of days in month recorded in paleontological specimens.
Y = length of the year (= tropical year, this is assumed to be constant
= 365,2422 days = not changed significantly)
Reference:
Runcorn, S. K., 1970.
Paleontological Measurements of the Changes in the Rotation Rates of Earth and Moon and
of the Rate of Retreat of the Moon from the Earth., pages 17-23, page 21.
In:
Runcorn S.K. (Editor), 1970.
Paleogeophysics.
Academic Press Inc., Printed in Great Britain, 518 pages, pages 17-23.
For example
(figures from my drawings one example out of range of experimental
test points for curiosity):
-4600*10^4 centuries (approx.. Earth’s formation time, 4600 Ma ago)
11 hours/day (present hours, assumption Earth and Sun distance have not
significantly changed, Y = 365,2422 days, solar days and tropical year)
Y = 780 * 11 h = 8580 h (present hours) = 357,5 days (present solar
days, Y changed little (?) in data of tables it is used Y=365,2422 days)
780 days/year (solar days and tropical year)
48 days/month (solar days and synodic month) = T’
T = T’ /(1+T’/Y) = 48 / (1 + 48/357,5) = 42,31812577 =
= approx. 42 days/sidereal month
Distance approximately between Earth and Moon at approx. 4600 Ma ago.
G = 6,67*10^(-11)*N*m^^2/kg^2
M = 5,974*10^24 kg
P = 42,31812577*11*60*60 s (present seconds) = 1675797,781 s
r = ( G*M*P^2/(4*Pi^2) )^()1/3 = 304832464,1 m =
= approx. 305000 km.
So linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps
Earth and Moon formed as a planet couple ?
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
_________________COPIES OF MY OLD ARTICLES BELOW (long)_________________
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
1 kirjoittajan 2 viestiä
mathematician
13.12.2008
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test
Purposes
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki,
Finland, Date: 12.12.2008)
Three rough data set (TABLE 1, days/month, TABLE 2, days/year and
TABLE 3, months/year)
are given in this paper for test purposes of ancient fossil time data.
Numbers are based
on Giorgio Pannella’s (1972) fossil time data. Interpretations are my
own.
These linear extrapolations are based also on uncertain assumption of
existence of
oscillation about 429.4 Ma in Pannella’s Figure 3 (days/month). Many
ages and fossil
points are still uncertain. Main intended area of use of these figures
is about 0-2000 Ma.
Tables of fossil time data
TABLE 1
-T/10^4 Days/Month
centuries
----------------------------
0 29,16
18,6 29,4
31,4 29,69
45,4 29,83
58,1 30,05
74,4 29,95
206,9 29,67
291,9 30,09
342,2 30,36
380,3 30,57
416,7 30,55
429,4 30,98
448 31,22
460,8 31,51
467,6 31,24
474,8 31,65
487,5 31,87
503,8 31,77
639 31,49
721,3 31,91
771,6 32,18
809,7 32,39
846,1 32,37
858,8 32,81
877,4 33,05
890,2 33,34
897 33,06
904,2 33,48
916,9 33,7
933,2 33,6
1068,4 33,32
1150,7 33,74
1201 34,01
1239,1 34,22
1275,5 34,2
1288,2 34,63
1306,8 34,87
1319,6 35,16
1326,4 34,89
1333,6 35,3
1346,3 35,52
1362,6 35,42
1497,8 35,14
1580,1 35,56
1630,4 35,83
1668,5 36,04
1704,9 36,02
1717,6 36,46
1736,2 36,7
1749 36,99
1755,8 36,71
1763 37,13
1775,7 37,35
1792 37,25
1927,2 36,97
2009,5 37,39
-----------------------
2059,8 37,66
2097,9 37,87
2134,3 37,85
2147 38,28
2165,6 38,52
2178,4 38,81
2185,2 38,54
2192,4 38,95
2205,1 39,17
2221,4 39,07
2356,6 38,79
2438,9 39,21
2489,2 39,48
2527,3 39,69
2563,7 39,67
2576,4 40,11
2595 40,35
2607,8 40,64
2614,6 40,36
2621,8 40,78
2634,5 41
2650,8 40,9
2786 40,62
2868,3 41,04
2918,6 41,31
2956,7 41,52
2993,1 41,5
3005,8 41,93
3024,4 42,17
3037,2 42,46
3044 42,19
3051,2 42,6
3063,9 42,82
3080,2 42,72
3215,4 42,44
3297,7 42,86
3348 43,13
3386,1 43,34
3422,5 43,32
3435,2 43,76
3453,8 44
3466,6 44,29
3473,4 44,01
3480,6 44,43
3493,3 44,65
3509,6 44,55
3644,8 44,27
3727,1 44,69
3777,4 44,96
3815,5 45,17
-----------------------
3851,9 45,15
3864,6 45,58
3883,2 45,82
3896 46,11
3902,8 45,84
3910 46,25
3922,7 46,47
3939 46,37
4074,2 46,09
4156,5 46,51
4206,8 46,78
4244,9 46,99
4281,3 46,97
4294 47,41
4312,6 47,65
4325,4 47,94
4332,2 47,66
4339,4 48,08
4352,1 48,3
4368,4 48,2
4503,6 47,92
-----------------------
(4585,9 48,34
4636,2 48,61
4674,3 48,82
4710,7 48,8
4761,6 49,49)
TABLE 2
-T/10^4 Days/Year
centuries
---------------------------
0 364,76
52,2 370,95
52,2 374,76
226,2 370,95
276,9 381,46
276,9 391,22
335,6 393,66
340,2 397,56
340,2 400,16
367,8 400,65
367,8 404,52
367,8 412,26
394,5 400,65
408,2 418,06
429,4 404,09
435,8 413,23
445 424
481,6 410,28
481,6 414,09
558,1 431,76
655,6 410,28
706,3 420,79
706,3 430,55
765 432,99
769,6 436,89
769,6 439,49
797,2 439,98
797,2 443,85
797,2 451,59
823,9 439,98
837,6 457,39
858,8 443,42
865,2 452,56
874,4 463,33
911 449,61
911 453,42
987,5 471,09
1085 449,61
1135,7 460,12
1135,7 469,88
1194,4 472,32
1199 476,22
1199 478,82
1226,6 479,31
1226,6 483,18
1226,6 490,92
1253,3 479,31
1267 496,72
1288,2 482,75
1294,6 491,89
1303,8 502,66
1340,4 488,94
1340,4 492,75
1416,9 510,42
1514,4 488,94
1565,1 499,45
1565,1 509,21
1623,8 511,65
1628,4 515,55
1628,4 518,15
1656 518,64
1656 522,51
1656 530,25
1682,7 518,64
1696,4 536,05
1717,6 522,08
1724 531,22
1733,2 541,99
1769,8 528,27
1769,8 532,08
1846,3 549,75
1943,8 528,27
1994,5 538,78
1994,5 548,54
-------------------------
2053,2 550,98
2057,8 554,88
2057,8 557,48
2085,4 557,97
2085,4 561,84
2085,4 569,58
2112,1 557,97
2125,8 575,38
2147 561,41
2153,4 570,55
2162,6 581,32
2199,2 567,6
2199,2 571,41
2275,7 589,08
2373,2 567,6
2423,9 578,11
2423,9 587,87
2482,6 590,31
2487,2 594,21
2487,2 596,81
2514,8 597,3
2514,8 601,17
2514,8 608,91
2541,5 597,3
2555,2 614,71
2576,4 600,75
2582,8 609,88
2592 620,65
2628,6 606,94
2628,6 610,75
2705,1 628,41
2802,6 606,94
2853,3 617,45
2853,3 627,21
2912 629,65
2916,6 633,55
2916,6 636,15
2944,2 636,64
2944,2 640,51
2944,2 648,25
2970,9 636,64
2984,6 654,05
3005,8 640,08
3012,2 649,22
3021,4 659,99
3058 646,27
3058 650,08
3134,5 667,75
3232 646,27
3282,7 656,78
3282,7 666,54
3341,4 668,98
3346 672,88
3346 675,48
3373,6 675,97
3373,6 679,84
3373,6 687,58
3400,3 675,97
3414 693,38
3435,2 679,41
3441,6 688,55
3450,8 699,32
3487,4 685,6
3487,4 689,41
3563,9 707,08
3661,4 685,6
3712,1 696,11
3712,1 705,87
3770,8 708,31
3775,4 712,21
3775,4 714,81
3803 715,3
3803 719,17
3803 726,91
-------------------------
3829,7 715,3
3843,4 732,71
3864,6 718,74
3871 727,88
3880,2 738,65
3916,8 724,93
3916,8 728,74
3993,3 746,41
4090,8 724,93
4141,5 735,44
4141,5 745,2
4200,2 747,64
4204,8 751,54
4204,8 754,14
4232,4 754,63
4232,4 758,5
4232,4 766,24
4259,1 754,63
4272,8 772,04
4294 758,07
4300,4 767,21
4309,6 777,98
4346,2 764,26
4346,2 768,07
4422,7 785,74
4520,2 764,26
-------------------------
(4570,9 774,77
4570,9 784,53
4629,6 786,97
4634,2 790,87
4634,2 793,47
4661,8 793,96
4661,8 797,83
4661,8 805,57
4688,5 793,96
4702,2 811,37
4723,4 797,4
4729,8 806,54
4739 817,31
4775,6 803,59
4775,6 807,4
4852,1 825,07)
TABLE 3
-T/10^4 Months/Year
centuries
------------------------------
0 12,34
70 12,49
70 12,6
160,7 11,56
220 12,55
290 12,71
340 13,11
360 12,93
360 13,35
429,4 12,95
499,4 13,1
499,4 13,21
510 13
590,1 12,17
649,4 13,16
719,4 13,32
769,4 13,72
789,4 13,54
789,4 13,96
858,8 13,56
928,8 13,71
928,8 13,82
939,4 13,61
1019,5 12,78
1078,8 13,77
1148,8 13,93
1198,8 14,33
1218,8 14,15
1218,8 14,57
1288,2 14,17
1358,2 14,32
1358,2 14,43
1368,8 14,22
1448,9 13,39
1508,2 14,38
1578,2 14,54
1628,2 14,94
1648,2 14,76
1648,2 15,18
1717,6 14,78
1787,6 14,93
1787,6 15,04
1798,2 14,83
1878,3 14
1937,6 14,99
2007,6 15,15
------------------------
2057,6 15,55
2077,6 15,37
2077,6 15,79
2147 15,39
2217 15,54
2217 15,65
2227,6 15,44
2307,7 14,61
2367 15,6
2437 15,76
2487 16,16
2507 15,98
2507 16,4
2576,4 16
2646,4 16,15
2646,4 16,26
2657 16,05
2737,1 15,22
2796,4 16,21
2866,4 16,37
2916,4 16,77
2936,4 16,59
2936,4 17,01
3005,8 16,61
3075,8 16,76
3075,8 16,87
3086,4 16,66
3166,5 15,83
3225,8 16,82
3295,8 16,98
3345,8 17,38
3365,8 17,2
3365,8 17,62
3435,2 17,22
3505,2 17,37
3505,2 17,48
3515,8 17,27
3595,9 16,44
3655,2 17,43
3725,2 17,59
3775,2 17,99
3795,2 17,81
3795,2 18,23
------------------------
3864,6 17,83
3934,6 17,98
3934,6 18,09
3945,2 17,88
4025,3 17,05
4084,6 18,04
4154,6 18,2
4204,6 18,6
4224,6 18,42
4224,6 18,84
4294 18,44
4364 18,59
4364 18,7
4374,6 18,49
4454,7 17,66
4514 18,65
-----------------------
(4584 18,81
4634 19,21
4654 19,03
4654 19,45
4723,4 19,05
4793,4 19,2
4793,4 19,31
4804 19,1
4884,1 18,27
4943,4 19,26)
References:
Pannella Giorgio, 1972.
Paleontological Evidence on the Earth’s Rotational History Since Early
Precambrian.
Astrophysics and Space Science, 16, (1972), 212-237.
(Figure 3 on page 235 and Figure 4 on page 236. Mean solar day,
Synodic Month, Tropical Year.
Exact age of sedimentation of the Gunflint Formation is 1878.3+-1.3
Ma, YPM-IP-28510/28511.)
Scrutton, C.T., (1964), 1965.
Periodicity in Devonian Coral Growth.
Paleontology, volume 7, part 4, pages 552-558, plates 86-87.
(Middle Devonian OUM DT2 fossil, age is 385.3 Ma – 397.5 Ma, GT2004,
approximate linear formula 12.37 – 1.43*10^(-7)*T, months/year,
T=centuries,
past time minus signed).
Scrutton, C.T., 1970.
Evidence for a monthly periodicity in the growth of some corals.
In:
Runcorn, S.K. (editor), 1970.
Paleogeophysics. Academic Press, London, pages 11-16.
Fralick, P., Davis, D.W., Kissin, S.A., 2002.
The age of the Gunflint Formation, Ontario, Canada: single zircon U-Pb
age determinations
from reworked volcanic ash.
Can. J. Earth Sci., 39, 1085-1091.
From: mathematician <haporopu@luukku.com>
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:46:50 +0000 (UTC)
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's fossil time data
1 kirjoittajan 2 viestiä
mathematician
14.1.2009
Muut vastaanottajat: george....@adelaide.edu.au
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's
fossil time data
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Author: H.K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki, Finland.
Date: 13.1.2009)
Below are few rough estimations of ancient time data. It should be
remembered that
these linear extrapolations are based on my uncertain assumption of
existence of
oscillation of period 429.4 Ma in Pannella's figure 3 (reference 2)
and ages
and data of fossils and stromatolites are in many cases uncertain
too.
The Elatina Formation and Reynella Siltstone
-----------------------------------------------------------------
620 Ma:
-----------
655.6 Ma, 410.28 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give roughly approx. 412 days/year)
639 Ma, 31.49 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give roughly approx. 31.7 days/month)
410.28/31.49 = 13.03 months/year, (primary value = 13.1 +-0.1 months/
year)
649.4 Ma, 13.16 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(primary value = 13.1 +-0.1 months/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 412/31.7 = 13.0 months/year)
(13.0-13.2 months/year)
The Big Cottonwood Formation
--------------------------------------------
900 Ma:
-----------
890.2 Ma, 33.34 days/month
897 Ma, 33.06 days/month
904.2 Ma, 33.48 days/month
(33-33.5 days/month, average = 33.29 days/month)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 33.4 days/month)
874.4 Ma, 463.33 days/year
911 Ma, 449.61 days/year
911 Ma, 453.42 days/year
(450-463 days/year, average = 455.45 days/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 451 days/year)
455.45/33.29 = 13.68 months/year, (primary value 13.5 months/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 451/33.4 = 13.5 months/year)
928.8 Ma, 13.71 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
928.8 Ma, 13.82 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(13.7-13.8 months/year, primary value 13.5 months/year)
(13.5-13.8 months/year)
The Weeli Wolli Formation
--------------------------------------
2450 Ma:
-------------
2438.9 Ma, 39.21 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 39.2 days/month)
2423.9 Ma, 587.87 days/year
2423.9 Ma, 578.11 days/year
(578-588 days/year, average = 582.99 days/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 585 days/year)
582.99/39.21 = 14.87 months/year, (primary value = 14.5 +-0.5 months/
year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 585/39.2 = 14.9 months/year)
2437 Ma, 15.76 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(primary value = 14.5 +-0.5 months/year)
(14.9-15.8 months/year)
Reference (1).
The Gunflint Formation
------------------
1878.3 +-1.3 Ma:
------------------------
1927.2 Ma, 36.97 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 37.2 days/month)
1846.3 Ma, 549.75 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 533 days/year)
549.75/36.97 = 14.87 months/year (primary value = 14 months/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 533/37.2 = 14.3 months/year)
1937.6 Ma, 14.99 monnths/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(14.3-15.0 months/year)
Age of the Bulawayan stromatolite UCLA-Bul-7 ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mode = 10-20-40, Highest Count = 41.
2576.6.4 Ma, 40.11 days/month
2595 Ma, 40.35 days/month
2607.8 Ma, 40.64 days/month
2614.6 Ma, 40.34 days/month
2621.8 Ma, 40.78 days/month
2634.5 Ma, 41 days/month
2650.8 Ma, 40.9 days/month
2786 Ma, 40.62 days/month
2868.3 Ma, 41.04 days/month
So age of the Bulawayan Stromatolite UCLA-Bul-7 could be:
2580 Ma - 2870 Ma.
(primary value of the age =
(2672 +- 12 Ma - 2715 +- 15 Ma), Upper Bulawayan Group or
(2831 +- 6 Ma - 2904 +- 9 Ma), Lower Bulawayan Group. These both
are not local age determinations from the Bubi Greenstone Belt near
Huntsman Quarries, Zimbabwe.)
Other Time Data for UCLA-Bul-7 stromatolite:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
(40-41 days/month, primary value)
(average = 40.5 days/month, primary value)
2576.4 Ma, 600.75 days/year
2582.8 Ma, 609.88 days/year
2592 Ma, 620.65 days/year
2628.6 Ma, 606.94 days/year
2628.6 Ma, 610.75 days/year
2705.1 Ma, 628.41 days/year
2802.6 Ma, 606.94 days/year
2853.3 Ma, 617.45 days/year
2853.3 Ma, 627.21 days/year
2912 Ma, 629.65 days/year
2916.6 Ma, 633.55 days/year
2916.6 Ma, 636.15 days/year
(average = 7428.33/12 = 619.03 = approx. 619 days/year)
(601-636 days/year)
619/40.5 = 15.3 months/year
OUM-DT2 based estimation:
2576.4 Ma, 16 months/year
2646.4 Ma, 16.15 months/year
2646.4 Ma, 16.26 months/year
2657 Ma, 16.05 months/year
2737.1 Ma, 15.22 months/year
2796.4 Ma, 16.21 months/year
2866.4 Ma, 16.37 months/year
2916.4 Ma, 16.77 months/year
(average = 129.03/8 = 16.13 = approx. 16.1 months/year)
(15.2 - 16.8 months/year)
References (2 and 3).
The Moodies Group
----------------------------
3225 Ma:
-------------
3215.4 Ma, 42.44 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure roughly gives approx. 42.8 days/month)
3232 Ma, 646.27 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figure roughly gives approx. 650 days/year)
646.27/42.44 = 15.23 months/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 650/42.8 = 15.2 months/year)
3225.8 Ma, 16.82 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(15.2-16.8 months/year)
Reference (4).
REFERENCES:
1. Williams, G.E. 2000.
Reviews of Geophysics, 38, 1/February 2000, pages 37-59.
2. Pannella, G., 1972.
Astrophysics and Space Science, 16, (1972), 212-237.
3. Fralick,P., Davis,D.W., Kissin,S.A., 2002.
Can. J. Earth Sci., 39, 1085-1091.
4. Eriksson,K.A., Simpson,E.L., Mueller,W., 2006.
Sedimentary Geology 190 (2006), 13-24.
5. Poropudas Hannu, 2009. Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella's
Fossil Time Data for Test
Purposes.
<533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
sci.bio.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,
sci.math.
Sat, 13 Dec 2008, 10 pages.
(I have drawn four extrapolated figures (0-1200 Ma, days/year, 0-4600
Ma, days/year,
0-1200 Ma days/month, 0-4600 Ma, days/month) but unfortunately they
are not possible
to give here due this text is in ASCII-format. I could send them via
email by request.
My email address:
hanporop
(at)
luukku.com )
From: mathematician <haporopu@luukku.com>
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's >> fossil time data
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <c91312bb-c2b7-4672-8f30-dbcdf1074662@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:52:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: george....@adelaide.edu.au
Re: Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated
Pannella's fossil time data
Hannu Poropudas
21.1.2009
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Earth's Rotational History from Linear
Extarpolation of Pannella's Ancient Time
Data of Fossils
----------------------------------------
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes.
<533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,
sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
On Jan 14, 7:52 am, mathematician <hapor...@luukku.com> wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 9:10:59 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 1:45:31 PM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 10:52:31 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
Period of megacycle 429.4 Ma is taken from reference 1.
Megacycles
(4620 - 4390 Ma)
4390 - 4190 Ma
4190 - 3960 Ma
3960 - 3760 Ma
3760 - 3540 Ma
3540 - 3330 Ma
3330 - 3110 Ma
3110 - 2900 Ma
2900 - 2680 Ma
2680 - 2470 Ma
2470 - 2250 Ma
2250 - 2040 Ma
2040 - 1820 Ma
1820 - 1620 Ma
1620 - 1390 Ma
1390 - 1190 Ma
1190 - 970 Ma
970 - 760 Ma
760 - 540 Ma
540 - 340 Ma
340 - 130 Ma
130 -
(Earth's age is approximated to be between about 4570 - 4450 Ma).
Approximately same set is achieved if one takes starting point
about 2680 Ma for breakup of the Pilbara continent ref. 2) and
then if one adds to this number 2680 Ma periodically
429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma uppwads of the list and secondly if one
subracts from this number 2680 Ma periodically 429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma downwards of the list.
(I put below misc references of Kapez B and Krapez B et al about the subject.
I'am not sure about existence of 2nd and 3rd order of cyclicities proposed by Krapez B and also I do not agreee his about period of about 360 Ma. Also some causes of 2nd order and 3rd order cylicities are questionable in my opinion.)
References:
1. Poropudas Hannu, 1996.
Harrastelijan ajatuksia päivän, kuukauden ja vuoden pituudesta muinaisina aikoina.
GEOLOGI 48, 4-5/1996, 92-96.
2. Kapez B, Eisenlohr B, 1998.
Precambrian Research, vol. 88. Pages 173-205, (2680 Ma on page 204).
3. Krapez B, 1993.
Precambrian Research, vol. 60. Pages 1-45.
4. Krapez B, 1996.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 43. Pages 355-380.
5. Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 1-36.
6. Horowitz R C and Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 879-886.
7. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 71-87.
8. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 89-103.
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
Kolamäentie 9E
Kiiminki / Oulu
Finland
References:
1. Poropudas Hannu, 1996.
Harrastelijan ajatuksia päivän, kuukauden ja vuoden pituudesta muinaisina aikoina.
GEOLOGI 48, 4-5/1996, 92-96.
http://elektra.helsinki.fi/se/g/0046-5720/48/4-5/harraste.pdf
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52ca9eb0-4d5a-4a5d-8c99-57d7444b8da0@googlegroups.com> Subject: Linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps Earth and
Moon formed as a planet couple ?
From: Hannu Poropudas <hanp...@luukku.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 06:53:44 +0000
(----COPY BELOW----)
Linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps Earth and Moon formed as a planet couple ?
2 posts by 2 authors
me (Hannu Poropudas change)
Apr 27
How to calculate with my extrapolated fossil data of Pannella G.:
T’ = length of the month recorded by marine life (= synodic month)
t’ = length of the day recorded by marine life (= solar day)
T = length of sidereal month
t = length of sidereal day
T = T’ /(1+T’/Y)
t = t’ /(1+t’/Y), this is very nearly equal to t’
S = T’ / t’ = number of days in month recorded in paleontological specimens.
Y = length of the year (= tropical year, this is assumed to be constant = 365,2422 days = not changed significantly)
Reference:
Runcorn, S. K., 1970.
Paleontological Measurements of the Changes in the Rotation Rates of Earth and Moon and
of the Rate of Retreat of the Moon from the Earth., pages 17-23, page 21. In:
Runcorn S.K. (Editor), 1970.
Paleogeophysics.
Academic Press Inc., Printed in Great Britain, 518 pages, pages 17-23.
For example
(figures from my drawings one example out of range of experimental
test points for curiosity):
-4600*10^4 centuries (approx.. Earth’s formation time, 4600 Ma ago)
11 hours/day (present hours, assumption Earth and Sun distance have not significantly changed, Y = 365,2422 days, solar days and tropical year)
Y = 780 * 11 h = 8580 h (present hours) = 357,5 days (present solar days, Y changed little (?) in data of tables it is used Y=365,2422 days)
780 days/year (solar days and tropical year)
48 days/month (solar days and synodic month) = T’
T = T’ /(1+T’/Y) = 48 / (1 + 48/357,5) = 42,31812577 =
= approx. 42 days/sidereal month
Distance approximately between Earth and Moon at approx. 4600 Ma ago.
G = 6,67*10^(-11)*N*m^^2/kg^2
M = 5,974*10^24 kg
P = 42,31812577*11*60*60 s (present seconds) = 1675797,781 s
r = ( G*M*P^2/(4*Pi^2) )^()1/3 = 304832464,1 m =
= approx. 305000 km.
So linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps
Earth and Moon formed as a planet couple ?
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
_________________COPIES OF MY OLD ARTICLES BELOW (long)_________________
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
1 kirjoittajan 2 viestiä
mathematician
13.12.2008
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki,
Finland, Date: 12.12.2008)
Three rough data set (TABLE 1, days/month, TABLE 2, days/year and
TABLE 3, months/year)
are given in this paper for test purposes of ancient fossil time data. Numbers are based
on Giorgio Pannella’s (1972) fossil time data. Interpretations are my own.
These linear extrapolations are based also on uncertain assumption of existence of
oscillation about 429.4 Ma in Pannella’s Figure 3 (days/month). Many ages and fossil
points are still uncertain. Main intended area of use of these figures
is about 0-2000 Ma.
Tables of fossil time data
TABLE 1
-T/10^4 Days/Month
centuries
----------------------------
0 29,16
18,6 29,4
31,4 29,69
45,4 29,83
58,1 30,05
74,4 29,95
206,9 29,67
291,9 30,09
342,2 30,36
380,3 30,57
416,7 30,55
429,4 30,98
448 31,22
460,8 31,51
467,6 31,24
474,8 31,65
487,5 31,87
503,8 31,77
639 31,49
721,3 31,91
771,6 32,18
809,7 32,39
846,1 32,37
858,8 32,81
877,4 33,05
890,2 33,34
897 33,06
904,2 33,48
916,9 33,7
933,2 33,6
1068,4 33,32
1150,7 33,74
1201 34,01
1239,1 34,22
1275,5 34,2
1288,2 34,63
1306,8 34,87
1319,6 35,16
1326,4 34,89
1333,6 35,3
1346,3 35,52
1362,6 35,42
1497,8 35,14
1580,1 35,56
1630,4 35,83
1668,5 36,04
1704,9 36,02
1717,6 36,46
1736,2 36,7
1749 36,99
1755,8 36,71
1763 37,13
1775,7 37,35
1792 37,25
1927,2 36,97
2009,5 37,39
-----------------------
2059,8 37,66
2097,9 37,87
2134,3 37,85
2147 38,28
2165,6 38,52
2178,4 38,81
2185,2 38,54
2192,4 38,95
2205,1 39,17
2221,4 39,07
2356,6 38,79
2438,9 39,21
2489,2 39,48
2527,3 39,69
2563,7 39,67
2576,4 40,11
2595 40,35
2607,8 40,64
2614,6 40,36
2621,8 40,78
2634,5 41
2650,8 40,9
2786 40,62
2868,3 41,04
2918,6 41,31
2956,7 41,52
2993,1 41,5
3005,8 41,93
3024,4 42,17
3037,2 42,46
3044 42,19
3051,2 42,6
3063,9 42,82
3080,2 42,72
3215,4 42,44
3297,7 42,86
3348 43,13
3386,1 43,34
3422,5 43,32
3435,2 43,76
3453,8 44
3466,6 44,29
3473,4 44,01
3480,6 44,43
3493,3 44,65
3509,6 44,55
3644,8 44,27
3727,1 44,69
3777,4 44,96
3815,5 45,17
-----------------------
3851,9 45,15
3864,6 45,58
3883,2 45,82
3896 46,11
3902,8 45,84
3910 46,25
3922,7 46,47
3939 46,37
4074,2 46,09
4156,5 46,51
4206,8 46,78
4244,9 46,99
4281,3 46,97
4294 47,41
4312,6 47,65
4325,4 47,94
4332,2 47,66
4339,4 48,08
4352,1 48,3
4368,4 48,2
4503,6 47,92
-----------------------
(4585,9 48,34
4636,2 48,61
4674,3 48,82
4710,7 48,8
4761,6 49,49)
TABLE 2
-T/10^4 Days/Year
centuries
---------------------------
0 364,76
52,2 370,95
52,2 374,76
226,2 370,95
276,9 381,46
276,9 391,22
335,6 393,66
340,2 397,56
340,2 400,16
367,8 400,65
367,8 404,52
367,8 412,26
394,5 400,65
408,2 418,06
429,4 404,09
435,8 413,23
445 424
481,6 410,28
481,6 414,09
558,1 431,76
655,6 410,28
706,3 420,79
706,3 430,55
765 432,99
769,6 436,89
769,6 439,49
797,2 439,98
797,2 443,85
797,2 451,59
823,9 439,98
837,6 457,39
858,8 443,42
865,2 452,56
874,4 463,33
911 449,61
911 453,42
987,5 471,09
1085 449,61
1135,7 460,12
1135,7 469,88
1194,4 472,32
1199 476,22
1199 478,82
1226,6 479,31
1226,6 483,18
1226,6 490,92
1253,3 479,31
1267 496,72
1288,2 482,75
1294,6 491,89
1303,8 502,66
1340,4 488,94
1340,4 492,75
1416,9 510,42
1514,4 488,94
1565,1 499,45
1565,1 509,21
1623,8 511,65
1628,4 515,55
1628,4 518,15
1656 518,64
1656 522,51
1656 530,25
1682,7 518,64
1696,4 536,05
1717,6 522,08
1724 531,22
1733,2 541,99
1769,8 528,27
1769,8 532,08
1846,3 549,75
1943,8 528,27
1994,5 538,78
1994,5 548,54
-------------------------
2053,2 550,98
2057,8 554,88
2057,8 557,48
2085,4 557,97
2085,4 561,84
2085,4 569,58
2112,1 557,97
2125,8 575,38
2147 561,41
2153,4 570,55
2162,6 581,32
2199,2 567,6
2199,2 571,41
2275,7 589,08
2373,2 567,6
2423,9 578,11
2423,9 587,87
2482,6 590,31
2487,2 594,21
2487,2 596,81
2514,8 597,3
2514,8 601,17
2514,8 608,91
2541,5 597,3
2555,2 614,71
2576,4 600,75
2582,8 609,88
2592 620,65
2628,6 606,94
2628,6 610,75
2705,1 628,41
2802,6 606,94
2853,3 617,45
2853,3 627,21
2912 629,65
2916,6 633,55
2916,6 636,15
2944,2 636,64
2944,2 640,51
2944,2 648,25
2970,9 636,64
2984,6 654,05
3005,8 640,08
3012,2 649,22
3021,4 659,99
3058 646,27
3058 650,08
3134,5 667,75
3232 646,27
3282,7 656,78
3282,7 666,54
3341,4 668,98
3346 672,88
3346 675,48
3373,6 675,97
3373,6 679,84
3373,6 687,58
3400,3 675,97
3414 693,38
3435,2 679,41
3441,6 688,55
3450,8 699,32
3487,4 685,6
3487,4 689,41
3563,9 707,08
3661,4 685,6
3712,1 696,11
3712,1 705,87
3770,8 708,31
3775,4 712,21
3775,4 714,81
3803 715,3
3803 719,17
3803 726,91
-------------------------
3829,7 715,3
3843,4 732,71
3864,6 718,74
3871 727,88
3880,2 738,65
3916,8 724,93
3916,8 728,74
3993,3 746,41
4090,8 724,93
4141,5 735,44
4141,5 745,2
4200,2 747,64
4204,8 751,54
4204,8 754,14
4232,4 754,63
4232,4 758,5
4232,4 766,24
4259,1 754,63
4272,8 772,04
4294 758,07
4300,4 767,21
4309,6 777,98
4346,2 764,26
4346,2 768,07
4422,7 785,74
4520,2 764,26
-------------------------
(4570,9 774,77
4570,9 784,53
4629,6 786,97
4634,2 790,87
4634,2 793,47
4661,8 793,96
4661,8 797,83
4661,8 805,57
4688,5 793,96
4702,2 811,37
4723,4 797,4
4729,8 806,54
4739 817,31
4775,6 803,59
4775,6 807,4
4852,1 825,07)
TABLE 3
-T/10^4 Months/Year
centuries
------------------------------
0 12,34
70 12,49
70 12,6
160,7 11,56
220 12,55
290 12,71
340 13,11
360 12,93
360 13,35
429,4 12,95
499,4 13,1
499,4 13,21
510 13
590,1 12,17
649,4 13,16
719,4 13,32
769,4 13,72
789,4 13,54
789,4 13,96
858,8 13,56
928,8 13,71
928,8 13,82
939,4 13,61
1019,5 12,78
1078,8 13,77
1148,8 13,93
1198,8 14,33
1218,8 14,15
1218,8 14,57
1288,2 14,17
1358,2 14,32
1358,2 14,43
1368,8 14,22
1448,9 13,39
1508,2 14,38
1578,2 14,54
1628,2 14,94
1648,2 14,76
1648,2 15,18
1717,6 14,78
1787,6 14,93
1787,6 15,04
1798,2 14,83
1878,3 14
1937,6 14,99
2007,6 15,15
------------------------
2057,6 15,55
2077,6 15,37
2077,6 15,79
2147 15,39
2217 15,54
2217 15,65
2227,6 15,44
2307,7 14,61
2367 15,6
2437 15,76
2487 16,16
2507 15,98
2507 16,4
2576,4 16
2646,4 16,15
2646,4 16,26
2657 16,05
2737,1 15,22
2796,4 16,21
2866,4 16,37
2916,4 16,77
2936,4 16,59
2936,4 17,01
3005,8 16,61
3075,8 16,76
3075,8 16,87
3086,4 16,66
3166,5 15,83
3225,8 16,82
3295,8 16,98
3345,8 17,38
3365,8 17,2
3365,8 17,62
3435,2 17,22
3505,2 17,37
3505,2 17,48
3515,8 17,27
3595,9 16,44
3655,2 17,43
3725,2 17,59
3775,2 17,99
3795,2 17,81
3795,2 18,23
------------------------
3864,6 17,83
3934,6 17,98
3934,6 18,09
3945,2 17,88
4025,3 17,05
4084,6 18,04
4154,6 18,2
4204,6 18,6
4224,6 18,42
4224,6 18,84
4294 18,44
4364 18,59
4364 18,7
4374,6 18,49
4454,7 17,66
4514 18,65
-----------------------
(4584 18,81
4634 19,21
4654 19,03
4654 19,45
4723,4 19,05
4793,4 19,2
4793,4 19,31
4804 19,1
4884,1 18,27
4943,4 19,26)
References:
Pannella Giorgio, 1972.
Paleontological Evidence on the Earth’s Rotational History Since Early Precambrian.
Astrophysics and Space Science, 16, (1972), 212-237.
(Figure 3 on page 235 and Figure 4 on page 236. Mean solar day,
Synodic Month, Tropical Year.
Exact age of sedimentation of the Gunflint Formation is 1878.3+-1.3
Ma, YPM-IP-28510/28511.)
Scrutton, C.T., (1964), 1965.
Periodicity in Devonian Coral Growth.
Paleontology, volume 7, part 4, pages 552-558, plates 86-87.
(Middle Devonian OUM DT2 fossil, age is 385.3 Ma – 397.5 Ma, GT2004, approximate linear formula 12.37 – 1.43*10^(-7)*T, months/year, T=centuries,
past time minus signed).
Scrutton, C.T., 1970.
Evidence for a monthly periodicity in the growth of some corals.
In:
Runcorn, S.K. (editor), 1970.
Paleogeophysics. Academic Press, London, pages 11-16.
Fralick, P., Davis, D.W., Kissin, S.A., 2002.
The age of the Gunflint Formation, Ontario, Canada: single zircon U-Pb
age determinations
from reworked volcanic ash.
Can. J. Earth Sci., 39, 1085-1091.
From: mathematician <haporopu@luukku.com>
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:46:50 +0000 (UTC)
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's fossil time data
1 kirjoittajan 2 viestiä
mathematician
14.1.2009
Muut vastaanottajat: george....@adelaide.edu.au
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's
fossil time data ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Author: H.K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki, Finland.
Date: 13.1.2009)
Below are few rough estimations of ancient time data. It should be remembered that
these linear extrapolations are based on my uncertain assumption of existence of
oscillation of period 429.4 Ma in Pannella's figure 3 (reference 2)
and ages
and data of fossils and stromatolites are in many cases uncertain
too.
The Elatina Formation and Reynella Siltstone -----------------------------------------------------------------
620 Ma:
-----------
655.6 Ma, 410.28 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give roughly approx. 412 days/year)
639 Ma, 31.49 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give roughly approx. 31.7 days/month) 410.28/31.49 = 13.03 months/year, (primary value = 13.1 +-0.1 months/ year)
649.4 Ma, 13.16 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(primary value = 13.1 +-0.1 months/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 412/31.7 = 13.0 months/year)
(13.0-13.2 months/year)
The Big Cottonwood Formation
--------------------------------------------
900 Ma:
-----------
890.2 Ma, 33.34 days/month
897 Ma, 33.06 days/month
904.2 Ma, 33.48 days/month
(33-33.5 days/month, average = 33.29 days/month)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 33.4 days/month)
874.4 Ma, 463.33 days/year
911 Ma, 449.61 days/year
911 Ma, 453.42 days/year
(450-463 days/year, average = 455.45 days/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 451 days/year) 455.45/33.29 = 13.68 months/year, (primary value 13.5 months/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 451/33.4 = 13.5 months/year)
928.8 Ma, 13.71 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
928.8 Ma, 13.82 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(13.7-13.8 months/year, primary value 13.5 months/year)
(13.5-13.8 months/year)
The Weeli Wolli Formation
--------------------------------------
2450 Ma:
-------------
2438.9 Ma, 39.21 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 39.2 days/month)
2423.9 Ma, 587.87 days/year
2423.9 Ma, 578.11 days/year
(578-588 days/year, average = 582.99 days/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 585 days/year) 582.99/39.21 = 14.87 months/year, (primary value = 14.5 +-0.5 months/ year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 585/39.2 = 14.9 months/year)
2437 Ma, 15.76 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(primary value = 14.5 +-0.5 months/year)
(14.9-15.8 months/year)
Reference (1).
The Gunflint Formation
------------------
1878.3 +-1.3 Ma:
------------------------
1927.2 Ma, 36.97 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 37.2 days/month)
1846.3 Ma, 549.75 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 533 days/year) 549.75/36.97 = 14.87 months/year (primary value = 14 months/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 533/37.2 = 14.3 months/year)
1937.6 Ma, 14.99 monnths/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(14.3-15.0 months/year)
Age of the Bulawayan stromatolite UCLA-Bul-7 ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mode = 10-20-40, Highest Count = 41.
2576.6.4 Ma, 40.11 days/month
2595 Ma, 40.35 days/month
2607.8 Ma, 40.64 days/month
2614.6 Ma, 40.34 days/month
2621.8 Ma, 40.78 days/month
2634.5 Ma, 41 days/month
2650.8 Ma, 40.9 days/month
2786 Ma, 40.62 days/month
2868.3 Ma, 41.04 days/month
So age of the Bulawayan Stromatolite UCLA-Bul-7 could be:
2580 Ma - 2870 Ma.
(primary value of the age =
(2672 +- 12 Ma - 2715 +- 15 Ma), Upper Bulawayan Group or
(2831 +- 6 Ma - 2904 +- 9 Ma), Lower Bulawayan Group. These both
are not local age determinations from the Bubi Greenstone Belt near Huntsman Quarries, Zimbabwe.)
Other Time Data for UCLA-Bul-7 stromatolite: -----------------------------------------------------------------
(40-41 days/month, primary value)
(average = 40.5 days/month, primary value)
2576.4 Ma, 600.75 days/year
2582.8 Ma, 609.88 days/year
2592 Ma, 620.65 days/year
2628.6 Ma, 606.94 days/year
2628.6 Ma, 610.75 days/year
2705.1 Ma, 628.41 days/year
2802.6 Ma, 606.94 days/year
2853.3 Ma, 617.45 days/year
2853.3 Ma, 627.21 days/year
2912 Ma, 629.65 days/year
2916.6 Ma, 633.55 days/year
2916.6 Ma, 636.15 days/year
(average = 7428.33/12 = 619.03 = approx. 619 days/year)
(601-636 days/year)
619/40.5 = 15.3 months/year
OUM-DT2 based estimation:
2576.4 Ma, 16 months/year
2646.4 Ma, 16.15 months/year
2646.4 Ma, 16.26 months/year
2657 Ma, 16.05 months/year
2737.1 Ma, 15.22 months/year
2796.4 Ma, 16.21 months/year
2866.4 Ma, 16.37 months/year
2916.4 Ma, 16.77 months/year
(average = 129.03/8 = 16.13 = approx. 16.1 months/year)
(15.2 - 16.8 months/year)
References (2 and 3).
The Moodies Group
----------------------------
3225 Ma:
-------------
3215.4 Ma, 42.44 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure roughly gives approx. 42.8 days/month)
3232 Ma, 646.27 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figure roughly gives approx. 650 days/year) 646.27/42.44 = 15.23 months/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 650/42.8 = 15.2 months/year)
3225.8 Ma, 16.82 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(15.2-16.8 months/year)
Reference (4).
REFERENCES:
1. Williams, G.E. 2000.
Reviews of Geophysics, 38, 1/February 2000, pages 37-59.
2. Pannella, G., 1972.
Astrophysics and Space Science, 16, (1972), 212-237.
3. Fralick,P., Davis,D.W., Kissin,S.A., 2002.
Can. J. Earth Sci., 39, 1085-1091.
4. Eriksson,K.A., Simpson,E.L., Mueller,W., 2006.
Sedimentary Geology 190 (2006), 13-24.
5. Poropudas Hannu, 2009. Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella's Fossil Time Data for Test
Purposes. <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com> sci.bio.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,
sci.math.
Sat, 13 Dec 2008, 10 pages.
(I have drawn four extrapolated figures (0-1200 Ma, days/year, 0-4600
Ma, days/year,
0-1200 Ma days/month, 0-4600 Ma, days/month) but unfortunately they
are not possible
to give here due this text is in ASCII-format. I could send them via
email by request.
My email address:
hanporop
(at)
luukku.com )
From: mathematician <haporopu@luukku.com>
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's
fossil time data
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <c91312bb-c2b7-4672-8f30-dbcdf1074662@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:52:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: george....@adelaide.edu.au
Re: Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated
Pannella's fossil time data
Hannu Poropudas
21.1.2009
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Earth's Rotational History from Linear
Extarpolation of Pannella's Ancient Time
Data of Fossils
----------------------------------------
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 8:59:51 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 9:10:59 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 1:45:31 PM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 10:52:31 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
Period of megacycle 429.4 Ma is taken from reference 1.
Megacycles
(4620 - 4390 Ma)
4390 - 4190 Ma
4190 - 3960 Ma
3960 - 3760 Ma
3760 - 3540 Ma
3540 - 3330 Ma
3330 - 3110 Ma
3110 - 2900 Ma
2900 - 2680 Ma
2680 - 2470 Ma
2470 - 2250 Ma
2250 - 2040 Ma
2040 - 1820 Ma
1820 - 1620 Ma
1620 - 1390 Ma
1390 - 1190 Ma
1190 - 970 Ma
970 - 760 Ma
760 - 540 Ma
540 - 340 Ma
340 - 130 Ma
130 -
(Earth's age is approximated to be between about 4570 - 4450 Ma).
Approximately same set is achieved if one takes starting point
about 2680 Ma for breakup of the Pilbara continent ref. 2) and
then if one adds to this number 2680 Ma periodically
429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma uppwads of the list and secondly if one subracts from this number 2680 Ma periodically 429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma downwards of the list.
(I put below misc references of Kapez B and Krapez B et al about the subject.
I'am not sure about existence of 2nd and 3rd order of cyclicities proposed by Krapez B and also I do not agreee his about period of about 360 Ma. Also some causes of 2nd order and 3rd order cylicities are questionable in my opinion.)
References:
1. Poropudas Hannu, 1996.
Harrastelijan ajatuksia päivän, kuukauden ja vuoden pituudesta muinaisina aikoina.
GEOLOGI 48, 4-5/1996, 92-96.
2. Kapez B, Eisenlohr B, 1998.
Precambrian Research, vol. 88. Pages 173-205, (2680 Ma on page 204).
3. Krapez B, 1993.
Precambrian Research, vol. 60. Pages 1-45.
4. Krapez B, 1996.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 43. Pages 355-380.
5. Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 1-36.
6. Horowitz R C and Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 879-886.
7. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 71-87.
8. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 89-103.
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
Kolamäentie 9E
Kiiminki / Oulu
Finland
References:
1. Poropudas Hannu, 1996.
Harrastelijan ajatuksia päivän, kuukauden ja vuoden pituudesta muinaisina aikoina.
GEOLOGI 48, 4-5/1996, 92-96.
http://elektra.helsinki.fi/se/g/0046-5720/48/4-5/harraste.pdf
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52ca9eb0-4d5a-4a5d-8c99-57d7444b8da0@googlegroups.com> Subject: Linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps Earth and
Moon formed as a planet couple ?
From: Hannu Poropudas <hanp...@luukku.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 06:53:44 +0000
(----COPY BELOW----)
Linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps Earth and Moon formed as a planet couple ?
2 posts by 2 authors
me (Hannu Poropudas change)
Apr 27
How to calculate with my extrapolated fossil data of Pannella G.:
T’ = length of the month recorded by marine life (= synodic month) t’ = length of the day recorded by marine life (= solar day)
T = length of sidereal month
t = length of sidereal day
T = T’ /(1+T’/Y)
t = t’ /(1+t’/Y), this is very nearly equal to t’
S = T’ / t’ = number of days in month recorded in paleontological specimens.
Y = length of the year (= tropical year, this is assumed to be constant = 365,2422 days = not changed significantly)
Reference:
Runcorn, S. K., 1970.
Paleontological Measurements of the Changes in the Rotation Rates of Earth and Moon and
of the Rate of Retreat of the Moon from the Earth., pages 17-23, page 21.
In:
Runcorn S.K. (Editor), 1970.
Paleogeophysics.
Academic Press Inc., Printed in Great Britain, 518 pages, pages 17-23.
For example
(figures from my drawings one example out of range of experimental test points for curiosity):
-4600*10^4 centuries (approx.. Earth’s formation time, 4600 Ma ago)
11 hours/day (present hours, assumption Earth and Sun distance have not significantly changed, Y = 365,2422 days, solar days and tropical year)
Y = 780 * 11 h = 8580 h (present hours) = 357,5 days (present solar days, Y changed little (?) in data of tables it is used Y=365,2422 days)
780 days/year (solar days and tropical year)
48 days/month (solar days and synodic month) = T’
T = T’ /(1+T’/Y) = 48 / (1 + 48/357,5) = 42,31812577 =
= approx. 42 days/sidereal month
Distance approximately between Earth and Moon at approx. 4600 Ma ago.
G = 6,67*10^(-11)*N*m^^2/kg^2
M = 5,974*10^24 kg
P = 42,31812577*11*60*60 s (present seconds) = 1675797,781 s
r = ( G*M*P^2/(4*Pi^2) )^()1/3 = 304832464,1 m =
= approx. 305000 km.
So linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps
Earth and Moon formed as a planet couple ?
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
_________________COPIES OF MY OLD ARTICLES BELOW (long)_________________
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
1 kirjoittajan 2 viestiä
mathematician
13.12.2008
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki,
Finland, Date: 12.12.2008)
Three rough data set (TABLE 1, days/month, TABLE 2, days/year and
TABLE 3, months/year)
are given in this paper for test purposes of ancient fossil time data. Numbers are based
on Giorgio Pannella’s (1972) fossil time data. Interpretations are my own.
These linear extrapolations are based also on uncertain assumption of existence of
oscillation about 429.4 Ma in Pannella’s Figure 3 (days/month). Many ages and fossil
points are still uncertain. Main intended area of use of these figures is about 0-2000 Ma.
Tables of fossil time data
TABLE 1
-T/10^4 Days/Month
centuries
----------------------------
0 29,16
18,6 29,4
31,4 29,69
45,4 29,83
58,1 30,05
74,4 29,95
206,9 29,67
291,9 30,09
342,2 30,36
380,3 30,57
416,7 30,55
429,4 30,98
448 31,22
460,8 31,51
467,6 31,24
474,8 31,65
487,5 31,87
503,8 31,77
639 31,49
721,3 31,91
771,6 32,18
809,7 32,39
846,1 32,37
858,8 32,81
877,4 33,05
890,2 33,34
897 33,06
904,2 33,48
916,9 33,7
933,2 33,6
1068,4 33,32
1150,7 33,74
1201 34,01
1239,1 34,22
1275,5 34,2
1288,2 34,63
1306,8 34,87
1319,6 35,16
1326,4 34,89
1333,6 35,3
1346,3 35,52
1362,6 35,42
1497,8 35,14
1580,1 35,56
1630,4 35,83
1668,5 36,04
1704,9 36,02
1717,6 36,46
1736,2 36,7
1749 36,99
1755,8 36,71
1763 37,13
1775,7 37,35
1792 37,25
1927,2 36,97
2009,5 37,39
-----------------------
2059,8 37,66
2097,9 37,87
2134,3 37,85
2147 38,28
2165,6 38,52
2178,4 38,81
2185,2 38,54
2192,4 38,95
2205,1 39,17
2221,4 39,07
2356,6 38,79
2438,9 39,21
2489,2 39,48
2527,3 39,69
2563,7 39,67
2576,4 40,11
2595 40,35
2607,8 40,64
2614,6 40,36
2621,8 40,78
2634,5 41
2650,8 40,9
2786 40,62
2868,3 41,04
2918,6 41,31
2956,7 41,52
2993,1 41,5
3005,8 41,93
3024,4 42,17
3037,2 42,46
3044 42,19
3051,2 42,6
3063,9 42,82
3080,2 42,72
3215,4 42,44
3297,7 42,86
3348 43,13
3386,1 43,34
3422,5 43,32
3435,2 43,76
3453,8 44
3466,6 44,29
3473,4 44,01
3480,6 44,43
3493,3 44,65
3509,6 44,55
3644,8 44,27
3727,1 44,69
3777,4 44,96
3815,5 45,17
-----------------------
3851,9 45,15
3864,6 45,58
3883,2 45,82
3896 46,11
3902,8 45,84
3910 46,25
3922,7 46,47
3939 46,37
4074,2 46,09
4156,5 46,51
4206,8 46,78
4244,9 46,99
4281,3 46,97
4294 47,41
4312,6 47,65
4325,4 47,94
4332,2 47,66
4339,4 48,08
4352,1 48,3
4368,4 48,2
4503,6 47,92
-----------------------
(4585,9 48,34
4636,2 48,61
4674,3 48,82
4710,7 48,8
4761,6 49,49)
TABLE 2
-T/10^4 Days/Year
centuries
---------------------------
0 364,76
52,2 370,95
52,2 374,76
226,2 370,95
276,9 381,46
276,9 391,22
335,6 393,66
340,2 397,56
340,2 400,16
367,8 400,65
367,8 404,52
367,8 412,26
394,5 400,65
408,2 418,06
429,4 404,09
435,8 413,23
445 424
481,6 410,28
481,6 414,09
558,1 431,76
655,6 410,28
706,3 420,79
706,3 430,55
765 432,99
769,6 436,89
769,6 439,49
797,2 439,98
797,2 443,85
797,2 451,59
823,9 439,98
837,6 457,39
858,8 443,42
865,2 452,56
874,4 463,33
911 449,61
911 453,42
987,5 471,09
1085 449,61
1135,7 460,12
1135,7 469,88
1194,4 472,32
1199 476,22
1199 478,82
1226,6 479,31
1226,6 483,18
1226,6 490,92
1253,3 479,31
1267 496,72
1288,2 482,75
1294,6 491,89
1303,8 502,66
1340,4 488,94
1340,4 492,75
1416,9 510,42
1514,4 488,94
1565,1 499,45
1565,1 509,21
1623,8 511,65
1628,4 515,55
1628,4 518,15
1656 518,64
1656 522,51
1656 530,25
1682,7 518,64
1696,4 536,05
1717,6 522,08
1724 531,22
1733,2 541,99
1769,8 528,27
1769,8 532,08
1846,3 549,75
1943,8 528,27
1994,5 538,78
1994,5 548,54
-------------------------
2053,2 550,98
2057,8 554,88
2057,8 557,48
2085,4 557,97
2085,4 561,84
2085,4 569,58
2112,1 557,97
2125,8 575,38
2147 561,41
2153,4 570,55
2162,6 581,32
2199,2 567,6
2199,2 571,41
2275,7 589,08
2373,2 567,6
2423,9 578,11
2423,9 587,87
2482,6 590,31
2487,2 594,21
2487,2 596,81
2514,8 597,3
2514,8 601,17
2514,8 608,91
2541,5 597,3
2555,2 614,71
2576,4 600,75
2582,8 609,88
2592 620,65
2628,6 606,94
2628,6 610,75
2705,1 628,41
2802,6 606,94
2853,3 617,45
2853,3 627,21
2912 629,65
2916,6 633,55
2916,6 636,15
2944,2 636,64
2944,2 640,51
2944,2 648,25
2970,9 636,64
2984,6 654,05
3005,8 640,08
3012,2 649,22
3021,4 659,99
3058 646,27
3058 650,08
3134,5 667,75
3232 646,27
3282,7 656,78
3282,7 666,54
3341,4 668,98
3346 672,88
3346 675,48
3373,6 675,97
3373,6 679,84
3373,6 687,58
3400,3 675,97
3414 693,38
3435,2 679,41
3441,6 688,55
3450,8 699,32
3487,4 685,6
3487,4 689,41
3563,9 707,08
3661,4 685,6
3712,1 696,11
3712,1 705,87
3770,8 708,31
3775,4 712,21
3775,4 714,81
3803 715,3
3803 719,17
3803 726,91
-------------------------
3829,7 715,3
3843,4 732,71
3864,6 718,74
3871 727,88
3880,2 738,65
3916,8 724,93
3916,8 728,74
3993,3 746,41
4090,8 724,93
4141,5 735,44
4141,5 745,2
4200,2 747,64
4204,8 751,54
4204,8 754,14
4232,4 754,63
4232,4 758,5
4232,4 766,24
4259,1 754,63
4272,8 772,04
4294 758,07
4300,4 767,21
4309,6 777,98
4346,2 764,26
4346,2 768,07
4422,7 785,74
4520,2 764,26
-------------------------
(4570,9 774,77
4570,9 784,53
4629,6 786,97
4634,2 790,87
4634,2 793,47
4661,8 793,96
4661,8 797,83
4661,8 805,57
4688,5 793,96
4702,2 811,37
4723,4 797,4
4729,8 806,54
4739 817,31
4775,6 803,59
4775,6 807,4
4852,1 825,07)
TABLE 3
-T/10^4 Months/Year
centuries
------------------------------
0 12,34
70 12,49
70 12,6
160,7 11,56
220 12,55
290 12,71
340 13,11
360 12,93
360 13,35
429,4 12,95
499,4 13,1
499,4 13,21
510 13
590,1 12,17
649,4 13,16
719,4 13,32
769,4 13,72
789,4 13,54
789,4 13,96
858,8 13,56
928,8 13,71
928,8 13,82
939,4 13,61
1019,5 12,78
1078,8 13,77
1148,8 13,93
1198,8 14,33
1218,8 14,15
1218,8 14,57
1288,2 14,17
1358,2 14,32
1358,2 14,43
1368,8 14,22
1448,9 13,39
1508,2 14,38
1578,2 14,54
1628,2 14,94
1648,2 14,76
1648,2 15,18
1717,6 14,78
1787,6 14,93
1787,6 15,04
1798,2 14,83
1878,3 14
1937,6 14,99
2007,6 15,15
------------------------
2057,6 15,55
2077,6 15,37
2077,6 15,79
2147 15,39
2217 15,54
2217 15,65
2227,6 15,44
2307,7 14,61
2367 15,6
2437 15,76
2487 16,16
2507 15,98
2507 16,4
2576,4 16
2646,4 16,15
2646,4 16,26
2657 16,05
2737,1 15,22
2796,4 16,21
2866,4 16,37
2916,4 16,77
2936,4 16,59
2936,4 17,01
3005,8 16,61
3075,8 16,76
3075,8 16,87
3086,4 16,66
3166,5 15,83
3225,8 16,82
3295,8 16,98
3345,8 17,38
3365,8 17,2
3365,8 17,62
3435,2 17,22
3505,2 17,37
3505,2 17,48
3515,8 17,27
3595,9 16,44
3655,2 17,43
3725,2 17,59
3775,2 17,99
3795,2 17,81
3795,2 18,23
------------------------
3864,6 17,83
3934,6 17,98
3934,6 18,09
3945,2 17,88
4025,3 17,05
4084,6 18,04
4154,6 18,2
4204,6 18,6
4224,6 18,42
4224,6 18,84
4294 18,44
4364 18,59
4364 18,7
4374,6 18,49
4454,7 17,66
4514 18,65
-----------------------
(4584 18,81
4634 19,21
4654 19,03
4654 19,45
4723,4 19,05
4793,4 19,2
4793,4 19,31
4804 19,1
4884,1 18,27
4943,4 19,26)
References:
Pannella Giorgio, 1972.
Paleontological Evidence on the Earth’s Rotational History Since Early Precambrian.
Astrophysics and Space Science, 16, (1972), 212-237.
(Figure 3 on page 235 and Figure 4 on page 236. Mean solar day,
Synodic Month, Tropical Year.
Exact age of sedimentation of the Gunflint Formation is 1878.3+-1.3
Ma, YPM-IP-28510/28511.)
Scrutton, C.T., (1964), 1965.
Periodicity in Devonian Coral Growth.
Paleontology, volume 7, part 4, pages 552-558, plates 86-87.
(Middle Devonian OUM DT2 fossil, age is 385.3 Ma – 397.5 Ma, GT2004, approximate linear formula 12.37 – 1.43*10^(-7)*T, months/year, T=centuries,
past time minus signed).
Scrutton, C.T., 1970.
Evidence for a monthly periodicity in the growth of some corals.
In:
Runcorn, S.K. (editor), 1970.
Paleogeophysics. Academic Press, London, pages 11-16.
Fralick, P., Davis, D.W., Kissin, S.A., 2002.
The age of the Gunflint Formation, Ontario, Canada: single zircon U-Pb age determinations
from reworked volcanic ash.
Can. J. Earth Sci., 39, 1085-1091.
From: mathematician <haporopu@luukku.com>
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:46:50 +0000 (UTC)
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's fossil time data
1 kirjoittajan 2 viestiä
mathematician
14.1.2009
Muut vastaanottajat: george....@adelaide.edu.au
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's fossil time data ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Author: H.K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki, Finland. Date: 13.1.2009)
Below are few rough estimations of ancient time data. It should be remembered that
these linear extrapolations are based on my uncertain assumption of existence of
oscillation of period 429.4 Ma in Pannella's figure 3 (reference 2)
and ages
and data of fossils and stromatolites are in many cases uncertain
too.
The Elatina Formation and Reynella Siltstone -----------------------------------------------------------------
620 Ma:
-----------
655.6 Ma, 410.28 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give roughly approx. 412 days/year)
639 Ma, 31.49 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give roughly approx. 31.7 days/month) 410.28/31.49 = 13.03 months/year, (primary value = 13.1 +-0.1 months/ year)
649.4 Ma, 13.16 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(primary value = 13.1 +-0.1 months/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 412/31.7 = 13.0 months/year)
(13.0-13.2 months/year)
The Big Cottonwood Formation --------------------------------------------
900 Ma:
-----------
890.2 Ma, 33.34 days/month
897 Ma, 33.06 days/month
904.2 Ma, 33.48 days/month
(33-33.5 days/month, average = 33.29 days/month)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 33.4 days/month)
874.4 Ma, 463.33 days/year
911 Ma, 449.61 days/year
911 Ma, 453.42 days/year
(450-463 days/year, average = 455.45 days/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 451 days/year) 455.45/33.29 = 13.68 months/year, (primary value 13.5 months/year) (Drawn extrapolated figures give 451/33.4 = 13.5 months/year)
928.8 Ma, 13.71 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
928.8 Ma, 13.82 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(13.7-13.8 months/year, primary value 13.5 months/year)
(13.5-13.8 months/year)
The Weeli Wolli Formation
--------------------------------------
2450 Ma:
-------------
2438.9 Ma, 39.21 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 39.2 days/month)
2423.9 Ma, 587.87 days/year
2423.9 Ma, 578.11 days/year
(578-588 days/year, average = 582.99 days/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 585 days/year) 582.99/39.21 = 14.87 months/year, (primary value = 14.5 +-0.5 months/ year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 585/39.2 = 14.9 months/year)
2437 Ma, 15.76 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(primary value = 14.5 +-0.5 months/year)
(14.9-15.8 months/year)
Reference (1).
The Gunflint Formation
------------------
1878.3 +-1.3 Ma:
------------------------
1927.2 Ma, 36.97 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 37.2 days/month)
1846.3 Ma, 549.75 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 533 days/year) 549.75/36.97 = 14.87 months/year (primary value = 14 months/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 533/37.2 = 14.3 months/year)
1937.6 Ma, 14.99 monnths/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(14.3-15.0 months/year)
Age of the Bulawayan stromatolite UCLA-Bul-7 ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mode = 10-20-40, Highest Count = 41.
2576.6.4 Ma, 40.11 days/month
2595 Ma, 40.35 days/month
2607.8 Ma, 40.64 days/month
2614.6 Ma, 40.34 days/month
2621.8 Ma, 40.78 days/month
2634.5 Ma, 41 days/month
2650.8 Ma, 40.9 days/month
2786 Ma, 40.62 days/month
2868.3 Ma, 41.04 days/month
So age of the Bulawayan Stromatolite UCLA-Bul-7 could be:
2580 Ma - 2870 Ma.
(primary value of the age =
(2672 +- 12 Ma - 2715 +- 15 Ma), Upper Bulawayan Group or
(2831 +- 6 Ma - 2904 +- 9 Ma), Lower Bulawayan Group. These both
are not local age determinations from the Bubi Greenstone Belt near Huntsman Quarries, Zimbabwe.)
Other Time Data for UCLA-Bul-7 stromatolite: -----------------------------------------------------------------
(40-41 days/month, primary value)
(average = 40.5 days/month, primary value)
2576.4 Ma, 600.75 days/year
2582.8 Ma, 609.88 days/year
2592 Ma, 620.65 days/year
2628.6 Ma, 606.94 days/year
2628.6 Ma, 610.75 days/year
2705.1 Ma, 628.41 days/year
2802.6 Ma, 606.94 days/year
2853.3 Ma, 617.45 days/year
2853.3 Ma, 627.21 days/year
2912 Ma, 629.65 days/year
2916.6 Ma, 633.55 days/year
2916.6 Ma, 636.15 days/year
(average = 7428.33/12 = 619.03 = approx. 619 days/year)
(601-636 days/year)
619/40.5 = 15.3 months/year
OUM-DT2 based estimation:
2576.4 Ma, 16 months/year
2646.4 Ma, 16.15 months/year
2646.4 Ma, 16.26 months/year
2657 Ma, 16.05 months/year
2737.1 Ma, 15.22 months/year
2796.4 Ma, 16.21 months/year
2866.4 Ma, 16.37 months/year
2916.4 Ma, 16.77 months/year
(average = 129.03/8 = 16.13 = approx. 16.1 months/year)
(15.2 - 16.8 months/year)
References (2 and 3).
The Moodies Group
----------------------------
3225 Ma:
-------------
3215.4 Ma, 42.44 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure roughly gives approx. 42.8 days/month)
3232 Ma, 646.27 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figure roughly gives approx. 650 days/year) 646.27/42.44 = 15.23 months/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 650/42.8 = 15.2 months/year)
3225.8 Ma, 16.82 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(15.2-16.8 months/year)
Reference (4).
REFERENCES:
1. Williams, G.E. 2000.
Reviews of Geophysics, 38, 1/February 2000, pages 37-59.
2. Pannella, G., 1972.
Astrophysics and Space Science, 16, (1972), 212-237.
3. Fralick,P., Davis,D.W., Kissin,S.A., 2002.
Can. J. Earth Sci., 39, 1085-1091.
4. Eriksson,K.A., Simpson,E.L., Mueller,W., 2006.
Sedimentary Geology 190 (2006), 13-24.
5. Poropudas Hannu, 2009. Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella's Fossil Time Data for Test
Purposes. <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com> sci.bio.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,
sci.math.
Sat, 13 Dec 2008, 10 pages.
(I have drawn four extrapolated figures (0-1200 Ma, days/year, 0-4600 Ma, days/year,
0-1200 Ma days/month, 0-4600 Ma, days/month) but unfortunately they
are not possible
to give here due this text is in ASCII-format. I could send them via email by request.
My email address:
hanporop
(at)
luukku.com )
From: mathematician <haporopu@luukku.com>
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's
fossil time data
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <c91312bb-c2b7-4672-8f30-dbcdf1074662@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:52:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: george....@adelaide.edu.au
Re: Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated
Pannella's fossil time data
Hannu Poropudas
21.1.2009
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Earth's Rotational History from Linear
Extarpolation of Pannella's Ancient Time
Data of Fossils
----------------------------------------
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
One important reference due articles of Krapez B
about his missing period 2408 Ma - 2044 Ma ?
Reference:
Muller Stefan G. 2005.
The tectonic evolution and volcanism of the Lower Wyloo Group,
Ashburton Province, with timing implications for giant iron-ore deposits of the Hamersley Province, Western Australia.
September 2005. 156 pages + XI-XXXI appendixes
(not appendix 1 and appendix 4 = Chapter 2).
(This is thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The University of Western Australia School of Earth and Geographical Sciences.
In the discipline of Geology. Supervisors: Prof Mark E Barley, Associate Prof Bryan Krapez, Dr Mark G Doyle and Assistant Prof David A D Evans).)
************
Chapter 2 (= Appendix 4, Geology 33, 577-580 article) is on pages 15-26.
This book contains maybe some interesting Figures and Tables (and references)
for timing purposes for this missing period?
Fig 2.2, p. 18,
Fig 3.3, p. 31,
Fig 5.3, p. 91,
Fig 5.33 p. 117,
Fig 6.3, p. 128,
Fig 6.4, p. 131,
Table 6.1, p. 135,
Fig 6.9, p. 138,
Fig 6.10, p. 139,
Fig 6.11, p. 141.
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
On Friday, November 3, 2017 at 9:41:43 AM UTC+2, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 8:59:51 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 9:10:59 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 1:45:31 PM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 10:52:31 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
Period of megacycle 429.4 Ma is taken from reference 1.
Megacycles
(4620 - 4390 Ma)
4390 - 4190 Ma
4190 - 3960 Ma
3960 - 3760 Ma
3760 - 3540 Ma
3540 - 3330 Ma
3330 - 3110 Ma
3110 - 2900 Ma
2900 - 2680 Ma
2680 - 2470 Ma
2470 - 2250 Ma
2250 - 2040 Ma
2040 - 1820 Ma
1820 - 1620 Ma
1620 - 1390 Ma
1390 - 1190 Ma
1190 - 970 Ma
970 - 760 Ma
760 - 540 Ma
540 - 340 Ma
340 - 130 Ma
130 -
(Earth's age is approximated to be between about 4570 - 4450 Ma).
Approximately same set is achieved if one takes starting point about 2680 Ma for breakup of the Pilbara continent ref. 2) and then if one adds to this number 2680 Ma periodically
429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma uppwads of the list and secondly if one subracts from this number 2680 Ma periodically 429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma
downwards of the list.
(I put below misc references of Kapez B and Krapez B et al about the subject.
I'am not sure about existence of 2nd and 3rd order of cyclicities proposed by Krapez B and also I do not agreee his about period of about 360 Ma. Also some causes of 2nd order and 3rd order cylicities are questionable in my opinion.)
References:
1. Poropudas Hannu, 1996.
Harrastelijan ajatuksia päivän, kuukauden ja vuoden pituudesta muinaisina aikoina.
GEOLOGI 48, 4-5/1996, 92-96.
2. Kapez B, Eisenlohr B, 1998.
Precambrian Research, vol. 88. Pages 173-205, (2680 Ma on page 204).
3. Krapez B, 1993.
Precambrian Research, vol. 60. Pages 1-45.
4. Krapez B, 1996.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 43. Pages 355-380.
5. Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 1-36.
6. Horowitz R C and Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 879-886.
7. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 71-87.
8. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 89-103.
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
Kolamäentie 9E
Kiiminki / Oulu
Finland
References:
1. Poropudas Hannu, 1996.
Harrastelijan ajatuksia päivän, kuukauden ja vuoden pituudesta muinaisina aikoina.
GEOLOGI 48, 4-5/1996, 92-96.
http://elektra.helsinki.fi/se/g/0046-5720/48/4-5/harraste.pdf
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52ca9eb0-4d5a-4a5d-8c99-57d7444b8da0@googlegroups.com> Subject: Linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps Earth and
Moon formed as a planet couple ?
From: Hannu Poropudas <hanp...@luukku.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 06:53:44 +0000
(----COPY BELOW----)
Linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps Earth and Moon formed as a planet couple ?
2 posts by 2 authors
me (Hannu Poropudas change)
Apr 27
How to calculate with my extrapolated fossil data of Pannella G.:
T’ = length of the month recorded by marine life (= synodic month) t’ = length of the day recorded by marine life (= solar day)
T = length of sidereal month
t = length of sidereal day
T = T’ /(1+T’/Y)
t = t’ /(1+t’/Y), this is very nearly equal to t’
S = T’ / t’ = number of days in month recorded in paleontological specimens.
Y = length of the year (= tropical year, this is assumed to be constant = 365,2422 days = not changed significantly)
Reference:
Runcorn, S. K., 1970.
Paleontological Measurements of the Changes in the Rotation Rates of Earth and Moon and
of the Rate of Retreat of the Moon from the Earth., pages 17-23, page 21.
In:
Runcorn S.K. (Editor), 1970.
Paleogeophysics.
Academic Press Inc., Printed in Great Britain, 518 pages, pages 17-23.
For example
(figures from my drawings one example out of range of experimental test points for curiosity):
-4600*10^4 centuries (approx.. Earth’s formation time, 4600 Ma ago)
11 hours/day (present hours, assumption Earth and Sun distance have not significantly changed, Y = 365,2422 days, solar days and tropical year)
Y = 780 * 11 h = 8580 h (present hours) = 357,5 days (present solar days, Y changed little (?) in data of tables it is used Y=365,2422 days)
780 days/year (solar days and tropical year)
48 days/month (solar days and synodic month) = T’
T = T’ /(1+T’/Y) = 48 / (1 + 48/357,5) = 42,31812577 =
= approx. 42 days/sidereal month
Distance approximately between Earth and Moon at approx. 4600 Ma ago.
G = 6,67*10^(-11)*N*m^^2/kg^2
M = 5,974*10^24 kg
P = 42,31812577*11*60*60 s (present seconds) = 1675797,781 s
r = ( G*M*P^2/(4*Pi^2) )^()1/3 = 304832464,1 m =
= approx. 305000 km.
So linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps
Earth and Moon formed as a planet couple ?
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
_________________COPIES OF MY OLD ARTICLES BELOW (long)_________________
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
1 kirjoittajan 2 viestiä
mathematician
13.12.2008
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 12.12.2008)
Three rough data set (TABLE 1, days/month, TABLE 2, days/year and TABLE 3, months/year)
are given in this paper for test purposes of ancient fossil time data. Numbers are based
on Giorgio Pannella’s (1972) fossil time data. Interpretations are my
own.
These linear extrapolations are based also on uncertain assumption of existence of
oscillation about 429.4 Ma in Pannella’s Figure 3 (days/month). Many ages and fossil
points are still uncertain. Main intended area of use of these figures is about 0-2000 Ma.
Tables of fossil time data
TABLE 1
-T/10^4 Days/Month
centuries
----------------------------
0 29,16
18,6 29,4
31,4 29,69
45,4 29,83
58,1 30,05
74,4 29,95
206,9 29,67
291,9 30,09
342,2 30,36
380,3 30,57
416,7 30,55
429,4 30,98
448 31,22
460,8 31,51
467,6 31,24
474,8 31,65
487,5 31,87
503,8 31,77
639 31,49
721,3 31,91
771,6 32,18
809,7 32,39
846,1 32,37
858,8 32,81
877,4 33,05
890,2 33,34
897 33,06
904,2 33,48
916,9 33,7
933,2 33,6
1068,4 33,32
1150,7 33,74
1201 34,01
1239,1 34,22
1275,5 34,2
1288,2 34,63
1306,8 34,87
1319,6 35,16
1326,4 34,89
1333,6 35,3
1346,3 35,52
1362,6 35,42
1497,8 35,14
1580,1 35,56
1630,4 35,83
1668,5 36,04
1704,9 36,02
1717,6 36,46
1736,2 36,7
1749 36,99
1755,8 36,71
1763 37,13
1775,7 37,35
1792 37,25
1927,2 36,97
2009,5 37,39
-----------------------
2059,8 37,66
2097,9 37,87
2134,3 37,85
2147 38,28
2165,6 38,52
2178,4 38,81
2185,2 38,54
2192,4 38,95
2205,1 39,17
2221,4 39,07
2356,6 38,79
2438,9 39,21
2489,2 39,48
2527,3 39,69
2563,7 39,67
2576,4 40,11
2595 40,35
2607,8 40,64
2614,6 40,36
2621,8 40,78
2634,5 41
2650,8 40,9
2786 40,62
2868,3 41,04
2918,6 41,31
2956,7 41,52
2993,1 41,5
3005,8 41,93
3024,4 42,17
3037,2 42,46
3044 42,19
3051,2 42,6
3063,9 42,82
3080,2 42,72
3215,4 42,44
3297,7 42,86
3348 43,13
3386,1 43,34
3422,5 43,32
3435,2 43,76
3453,8 44
3466,6 44,29
3473,4 44,01
3480,6 44,43
3493,3 44,65
3509,6 44,55
3644,8 44,27
3727,1 44,69
3777,4 44,96
3815,5 45,17
-----------------------
3851,9 45,15
3864,6 45,58
3883,2 45,82
3896 46,11
3902,8 45,84
3910 46,25
3922,7 46,47
3939 46,37
4074,2 46,09
4156,5 46,51
4206,8 46,78
4244,9 46,99
4281,3 46,97
4294 47,41
4312,6 47,65
4325,4 47,94
4332,2 47,66
4339,4 48,08
4352,1 48,3
4368,4 48,2
4503,6 47,92
-----------------------
(4585,9 48,34
4636,2 48,61
4674,3 48,82
4710,7 48,8
4761,6 49,49)
TABLE 2
-T/10^4 Days/Year
centuries
---------------------------
0 364,76
52,2 370,95
52,2 374,76
226,2 370,95
276,9 381,46
276,9 391,22
335,6 393,66
340,2 397,56
340,2 400,16
367,8 400,65
367,8 404,52
367,8 412,26
394,5 400,65
408,2 418,06
429,4 404,09
435,8 413,23
445 424
481,6 410,28
481,6 414,09
558,1 431,76
655,6 410,28
706,3 420,79
706,3 430,55
765 432,99
769,6 436,89
769,6 439,49
797,2 439,98
797,2 443,85
797,2 451,59
823,9 439,98
837,6 457,39
858,8 443,42
865,2 452,56
874,4 463,33
911 449,61
911 453,42
987,5 471,09
1085 449,61
1135,7 460,12
1135,7 469,88
1194,4 472,32
1199 476,22
1199 478,82
1226,6 479,31
1226,6 483,18
1226,6 490,92
1253,3 479,31
1267 496,72
1288,2 482,75
1294,6 491,89
1303,8 502,66
1340,4 488,94
1340,4 492,75
1416,9 510,42
1514,4 488,94
1565,1 499,45
1565,1 509,21
1623,8 511,65
1628,4 515,55
1628,4 518,15
1656 518,64
1656 522,51
1656 530,25
1682,7 518,64
1696,4 536,05
1717,6 522,08
1724 531,22
1733,2 541,99
1769,8 528,27
1769,8 532,08
1846,3 549,75
1943,8 528,27
1994,5 538,78
1994,5 548,54
-------------------------
2053,2 550,98
2057,8 554,88
2057,8 557,48
2085,4 557,97
2085,4 561,84
2085,4 569,58
2112,1 557,97
2125,8 575,38
2147 561,41
2153,4 570,55
2162,6 581,32
2199,2 567,6
2199,2 571,41
2275,7 589,08
2373,2 567,6
2423,9 578,11
2423,9 587,87
2482,6 590,31
2487,2 594,21
2487,2 596,81
2514,8 597,3
2514,8 601,17
2514,8 608,91
2541,5 597,3
2555,2 614,71
2576,4 600,75
2582,8 609,88
2592 620,65
2628,6 606,94
2628,6 610,75
2705,1 628,41
2802,6 606,94
2853,3 617,45
2853,3 627,21
2912 629,65
2916,6 633,55
2916,6 636,15
2944,2 636,64
2944,2 640,51
2944,2 648,25
2970,9 636,64
2984,6 654,05
3005,8 640,08
3012,2 649,22
3021,4 659,99
3058 646,27
3058 650,08
3134,5 667,75
3232 646,27
3282,7 656,78
3282,7 666,54
3341,4 668,98
3346 672,88
3346 675,48
3373,6 675,97
3373,6 679,84
3373,6 687,58
3400,3 675,97
3414 693,38
3435,2 679,41
3441,6 688,55
3450,8 699,32
3487,4 685,6
3487,4 689,41
3563,9 707,08
3661,4 685,6
3712,1 696,11
3712,1 705,87
3770,8 708,31
3775,4 712,21
3775,4 714,81
3803 715,3
3803 719,17
3803 726,91
-------------------------
3829,7 715,3
3843,4 732,71
3864,6 718,74
3871 727,88
3880,2 738,65
3916,8 724,93
3916,8 728,74
3993,3 746,41
4090,8 724,93
4141,5 735,44
4141,5 745,2
4200,2 747,64
4204,8 751,54
4204,8 754,14
4232,4 754,63
4232,4 758,5
4232,4 766,24
4259,1 754,63
4272,8 772,04
4294 758,07
4300,4 767,21
4309,6 777,98
4346,2 764,26
4346,2 768,07
4422,7 785,74
4520,2 764,26
-------------------------
(4570,9 774,77
4570,9 784,53
4629,6 786,97
4634,2 790,87
4634,2 793,47
4661,8 793,96
4661,8 797,83
4661,8 805,57
4688,5 793,96
4702,2 811,37
4723,4 797,4
4729,8 806,54
4739 817,31
4775,6 803,59
4775,6 807,4
4852,1 825,07)
TABLE 3
-T/10^4 Months/Year
centuries
------------------------------
0 12,34
70 12,49
70 12,6
160,7 11,56
220 12,55
290 12,71
340 13,11
360 12,93
360 13,35
429,4 12,95
499,4 13,1
499,4 13,21
510 13
590,1 12,17
649,4 13,16
719,4 13,32
769,4 13,72
789,4 13,54
789,4 13,96
858,8 13,56
928,8 13,71
928,8 13,82
939,4 13,61
1019,5 12,78
1078,8 13,77
1148,8 13,93
1198,8 14,33
1218,8 14,15
1218,8 14,57
1288,2 14,17
1358,2 14,32
1358,2 14,43
1368,8 14,22
1448,9 13,39
1508,2 14,38
1578,2 14,54
1628,2 14,94
1648,2 14,76
1648,2 15,18
1717,6 14,78
1787,6 14,93
1787,6 15,04
1798,2 14,83
1878,3 14
1937,6 14,99
2007,6 15,15
------------------------
2057,6 15,55
2077,6 15,37
2077,6 15,79
2147 15,39
2217 15,54
2217 15,65
2227,6 15,44
2307,7 14,61
2367 15,6
2437 15,76
2487 16,16
2507 15,98
2507 16,4
2576,4 16
2646,4 16,15
2646,4 16,26
2657 16,05
2737,1 15,22
2796,4 16,21
2866,4 16,37
2916,4 16,77
2936,4 16,59
2936,4 17,01
3005,8 16,61
3075,8 16,76
3075,8 16,87
3086,4 16,66
3166,5 15,83
3225,8 16,82
3295,8 16,98
3345,8 17,38
3365,8 17,2
3365,8 17,62
3435,2 17,22
3505,2 17,37
3505,2 17,48
3515,8 17,27
3595,9 16,44
3655,2 17,43
3725,2 17,59
3775,2 17,99
3795,2 17,81
3795,2 18,23
------------------------
3864,6 17,83
3934,6 17,98
3934,6 18,09
3945,2 17,88
4025,3 17,05
4084,6 18,04
4154,6 18,2
4204,6 18,6
4224,6 18,42
4224,6 18,84
4294 18,44
4364 18,59
4364 18,7
4374,6 18,49
4454,7 17,66
4514 18,65
-----------------------
(4584 18,81
4634 19,21
4654 19,03
4654 19,45
4723,4 19,05
4793,4 19,2
4793,4 19,31
4804 19,1
4884,1 18,27
4943,4 19,26)
References:
Pannella Giorgio, 1972.
Paleontological Evidence on the Earth’s Rotational History Since Early
Precambrian.
Astrophysics and Space Science, 16, (1972), 212-237.
(Figure 3 on page 235 and Figure 4 on page 236. Mean solar day, Synodic Month, Tropical Year.
Exact age of sedimentation of the Gunflint Formation is 1878.3+-1.3 Ma, YPM-IP-28510/28511.)
Scrutton, C.T., (1964), 1965.
Periodicity in Devonian Coral Growth.
Paleontology, volume 7, part 4, pages 552-558, plates 86-87.
(Middle Devonian OUM DT2 fossil, age is 385.3 Ma – 397.5 Ma, GT2004, approximate linear formula 12.37 – 1.43*10^(-7)*T, months/year, T=centuries,
past time minus signed).
Scrutton, C.T., 1970.
Evidence for a monthly periodicity in the growth of some corals.
In:
Runcorn, S.K. (editor), 1970.
Paleogeophysics. Academic Press, London, pages 11-16.
Fralick, P., Davis, D.W., Kissin, S.A., 2002.
The age of the Gunflint Formation, Ontario, Canada: single zircon U-Pb age determinations
from reworked volcanic ash.
Can. J. Earth Sci., 39, 1085-1091.
From: mathematician <haporopu@luukku.com>
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:46:50 +0000 (UTC)
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's fossil time data
1 kirjoittajan 2 viestiä
mathematician
14.1.2009
Muut vastaanottajat: george....@adelaide.edu.au
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's fossil time data ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Author: H.K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki, Finland. Date: 13.1.2009)
Below are few rough estimations of ancient time data. It should be remembered that
these linear extrapolations are based on my uncertain assumption of existence of
oscillation of period 429.4 Ma in Pannella's figure 3 (reference 2) and ages
and data of fossils and stromatolites are in many cases uncertain
too.
The Elatina Formation and Reynella Siltstone -----------------------------------------------------------------
620 Ma:
-----------
655.6 Ma, 410.28 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give roughly approx. 412 days/year)
639 Ma, 31.49 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give roughly approx. 31.7 days/month) 410.28/31.49 = 13.03 months/year, (primary value = 13.1 +-0.1 months/ year)
649.4 Ma, 13.16 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(primary value = 13.1 +-0.1 months/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 412/31.7 = 13.0 months/year) (13.0-13.2 months/year)
The Big Cottonwood Formation --------------------------------------------
900 Ma:
-----------
890.2 Ma, 33.34 days/month
897 Ma, 33.06 days/month
904.2 Ma, 33.48 days/month
(33-33.5 days/month, average = 33.29 days/month)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 33.4 days/month) 874.4 Ma, 463.33 days/year
911 Ma, 449.61 days/year
911 Ma, 453.42 days/year
(450-463 days/year, average = 455.45 days/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 451 days/year) 455.45/33.29 = 13.68 months/year, (primary value 13.5 months/year) (Drawn extrapolated figures give 451/33.4 = 13.5 months/year)
928.8 Ma, 13.71 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
928.8 Ma, 13.82 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(13.7-13.8 months/year, primary value 13.5 months/year)
(13.5-13.8 months/year)
The Weeli Wolli Formation
--------------------------------------
2450 Ma:
-------------
2438.9 Ma, 39.21 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 39.2 days/month) 2423.9 Ma, 587.87 days/year
2423.9 Ma, 578.11 days/year
(578-588 days/year, average = 582.99 days/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 585 days/year) 582.99/39.21 = 14.87 months/year, (primary value = 14.5 +-0.5 months/ year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 585/39.2 = 14.9 months/year)
2437 Ma, 15.76 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(primary value = 14.5 +-0.5 months/year)
(14.9-15.8 months/year)
Reference (1).
The Gunflint Formation
------------------
1878.3 +-1.3 Ma:
------------------------
1927.2 Ma, 36.97 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 37.2 days/month) 1846.3 Ma, 549.75 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 533 days/year) 549.75/36.97 = 14.87 months/year (primary value = 14 months/year) (Drawn extrapolated figures give 533/37.2 = 14.3 months/year)
1937.6 Ma, 14.99 monnths/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(14.3-15.0 months/year)
Age of the Bulawayan stromatolite UCLA-Bul-7 ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mode = 10-20-40, Highest Count = 41.
2576.6.4 Ma, 40.11 days/month
2595 Ma, 40.35 days/month
2607.8 Ma, 40.64 days/month
2614.6 Ma, 40.34 days/month
2621.8 Ma, 40.78 days/month
2634.5 Ma, 41 days/month
2650.8 Ma, 40.9 days/month
2786 Ma, 40.62 days/month
2868.3 Ma, 41.04 days/month
So age of the Bulawayan Stromatolite UCLA-Bul-7 could be:
2580 Ma - 2870 Ma.
(primary value of the age =
(2672 +- 12 Ma - 2715 +- 15 Ma), Upper Bulawayan Group or
(2831 +- 6 Ma - 2904 +- 9 Ma), Lower Bulawayan Group. These both
are not local age determinations from the Bubi Greenstone Belt near Huntsman Quarries, Zimbabwe.)
Other Time Data for UCLA-Bul-7 stromatolite: ----------------------------------------------------------------- (40-41 days/month, primary value)
(average = 40.5 days/month, primary value)
2576.4 Ma, 600.75 days/year
2582.8 Ma, 609.88 days/year
2592 Ma, 620.65 days/year
2628.6 Ma, 606.94 days/year
2628.6 Ma, 610.75 days/year
2705.1 Ma, 628.41 days/year
2802.6 Ma, 606.94 days/year
2853.3 Ma, 617.45 days/year
2853.3 Ma, 627.21 days/year
2912 Ma, 629.65 days/year
2916.6 Ma, 633.55 days/year
2916.6 Ma, 636.15 days/year
(average = 7428.33/12 = 619.03 = approx. 619 days/year)
(601-636 days/year)
619/40.5 = 15.3 months/year
OUM-DT2 based estimation:
2576.4 Ma, 16 months/year
2646.4 Ma, 16.15 months/year
2646.4 Ma, 16.26 months/year
2657 Ma, 16.05 months/year
2737.1 Ma, 15.22 months/year
2796.4 Ma, 16.21 months/year
2866.4 Ma, 16.37 months/year
2916.4 Ma, 16.77 months/year
(average = 129.03/8 = 16.13 = approx. 16.1 months/year)
(15.2 - 16.8 months/year)
References (2 and 3).
The Moodies Group
----------------------------
3225 Ma:
-------------
3215.4 Ma, 42.44 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure roughly gives approx. 42.8 days/month)
3232 Ma, 646.27 days/year
Period of megacycle 429.4 Ma is taken from reference 1.Siderian (2500-2300 Ma)
Megacycles
(4620 - 4390 Ma)
4390 - 4190 Ma
4190 - 3960 Ma
3960 - 3760 Ma
3760 - 3540 Ma
3540 - 3330 Ma
3330 - 3110 Ma
3110 - 2900 Ma
2900 - 2680 Ma
2680 - 2470 Ma
2470 - 2250 Ma
2250 - 2040 MaRhyacian (2300-2050 Ma)
2040 - 1820 MaOrosirian (2050-1800 Ma)
1820 - 1620 MaStatherian (1800-1600 Ma)
1620 - 1390 Ma
1390 - 1190 Ma
1190 - 970 Ma
970 - 760 Ma
760 - 540 Ma
540 - 340 Ma
340 - 130 Ma
130 -
(Earth's age is approximated to be between about 4570 - 4450 Ma).
Approximately same set is achieved if one takes starting point
about 2680 Ma for breakup of the Pilbara continent ref. 2) and
then if one adds to this number 2680 Ma periodically
429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma uppwads of the list and secondly if one
subracts from this number 2680 Ma periodically 429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma downwards of the list.
(I put below misc references of Kapez B and Krapez B et al about the subject. I'am not sure about existence of 2nd and 3rd order of cyclicities
proposed by Krapez B and also I do not agreee his about period of
about 360 Ma. Also some causes of 2nd order and 3rd order cylicities are questionable in my opinion.)
References:
1. Poropudas Hannu, 1996.
Harrastelijan ajatuksia päivän, kuukauden ja vuoden pituudesta
muinaisina aikoina.
GEOLOGI 48, 4-5/1996, 92-96.
2. Kapez B, Eisenlohr B, 1998.
Precambrian Research, vol. 88. Pages 173-205, (2680 Ma on page 204).
3. Krapez B, 1993.
Precambrian Research, vol. 60. Pages 1-45.
4. Krapez B, 1996.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 43. Pages 355-380.
5. Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 1-36.
6. Horowitz R C and Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 879-886.
7. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 71-87.
8. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 89-103.
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
Kolamäentie 9E
Kiiminki / Oulu
Finland
You really believe this, Hannu?
Or is it that you are working on a new fiction novel? In that case you have a great class, and deserve to be called "The Jules Verne from The North"
Congratulations?!
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas, Finland.
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas, Finland.
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's- näytä lainattu teksti -
fossil time data ---------------------------------------------------------------------------¬---------------------------------------------
<533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1...@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
sci.bio.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,
sci.math.
Sat, 13 Dec 2008, 10 pages.
(I have drawn four extrapolated figures (0-1200 Ma, days/year, 0-4600
Ma, days/year,
0-1200 Ma days/month, 0-4600 Ma, days/month) but unfortunately they
are not possible
to give here due this text is in ASCII-format. I could send them via
email by request.
My email address:
hanporop
(at)
luukku.com )
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas, Finland.TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes.
<533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,
sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 10:55:43 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:Finland.
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas,
TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.Simple approximate calculation of the length of the cosmic year
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes.
<533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,
sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
R0 = 7.92 +- 0.16 kpc ,(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model).
v0 = 227 km*s^(-1), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
1 pc = 3.26 ly,
1 ly = 9.460528436*10^15 m,
R0 = 7.92 kpc = 7.92*3.26*10^3*9.460528436*10^15 m = 2.442632758*10^20 m, 2*Pi*R0 = 1.534751426*10^21 m,
v0 = 227*10^3*m*s^(-1),
T0 = 2*Pi*R0/v0, (simple circular motion approximation for the length of cosmic year).
T0 = 1.534751426*10^21 / 227*10^3 s = 6.761019496*10^15 s =
= 6.761019496*10^15 / (365.2422*24*60*60) yrs = 214248354.8 yrs =
= approx. 214.25 Myrs.
(simplified error estimates , if R0 = 8.08 kpc, T0 = 218576604.4 yrs = approx. 219 Myrs and
if R0 = 7.76 kpc, T0 = 209920105.2 yrs = approx. 210 Myrs)
Reference:
VERA collaboration, Tomoya Hirota et al., 2020.
The First VERA Astronomy Catalog.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2020) 72 (4), 50 (1-19). (p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Oulu / Kiiminki
Finland.
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 10:55:43 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:Finland.
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas,
TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.Simple approximate calculation of the length of the cosmic year
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes.
<533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,
sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
R0 = 7.92 +- 0.16 kpc ,(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model).
v0 = 227 km*s^(-1), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
1 pc = 3.26 ly,
1 ly = 9.460528436*10^15 m,
R0 = 7.92 kpc = 7.92*3.26*10^3*9.460528436*10^15 m = 2.442632758*10^20 m, 2*Pi*R0 = 1.534751426*10^21 m,
v0 = 227*10^3*m*s^(-1),
T0 = 2*Pi*R0/v0, (simple circular motion approximation for the length of cosmic year).
T0 = 1.534751426*10^21 / 227*10^3 s = 6.761019496*10^15 s =
= 6.761019496*10^15 / (365.2422*24*60*60) yrs = 214248354.8 yrs =
= approx. 214.25 Myrs.
(simplified error estimates , if R0 = 8.08 kpc, T0 = 218576604.4 yrs = approx. 219 Myrs and
if R0 = 7.76 kpc, T0 = 209920105.2 yrs = approx. 210 Myrs)
Reference:
VERA collaboration, Tomoya Hirota et al., 2020.
The First VERA Astronomy Catalog.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2020) 72 (4), 50 (1-19). (p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Oulu / Kiiminki
Finland.
maanantai 26. heinäkuuta 2021 klo 15.42.53 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:Finland.
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 10:55:43 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas,
TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.Simple approximate calculation of the length of the cosmic year
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes. <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,
sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
R0 = 7.92 +- 0.16 kpc ,(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model).
v0 = 227 km*s^(-1), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
1 pc = 3.26 ly,
1 ly = 9.460528436*10^15 m,
R0 = 7.92 kpc = 7.92*3.26*10^3*9.460528436*10^15 m = 2.442632758*10^20 m, 2*Pi*R0 = 1.534751426*10^21 m,
v0 = 227*10^3*m*s^(-1),
T0 = 2*Pi*R0/v0, (simple circular motion approximation for the length of cosmic year).
T0 = 1.534751426*10^21 / 227*10^3 s = 6.761019496*10^15 s =
= 6.761019496*10^15 / (365.2422*24*60*60) yrs = 214248354.8 yrs =
= approx. 214.25 Myrs.
(simplified error estimates , if R0 = 8.08 kpc, T0 = 218576604.4 yrs = approx. 219 Myrs and
if R0 = 7.76 kpc, T0 = 209920105.2 yrs = approx. 210 Myrs)
Reference:
VERA collaboration, Tomoya Hirota et al., 2020.
The First VERA Astronomy Catalog.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2020) 72 (4), 50 (1-19).
(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasONE SPECULATION OF MINE:
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Oulu / Kiiminki
Finland.
One very brave strange speculation of mine about time-dimension of the whole space:
If I speculate that whole space would be a kind of "mega-galaxy",
then I would speculate that this "mega-galaxy" has a center (inside black hole,
"H-M's big ball" and "H-M's color-forces center planet" instead of singularity).
This would be the origin of time dimension of the whole space.
Time-dimension would be formed from a "frozen time-wave",
which consists two kind of direction of flow of time,
one direction forwards time and other backwards of time.
(this speculation of mine is similar than H-M's color drawing of a black hole,
which is public visible in my Hannu Poropudas Facebook Page.)
Period of this "frozen time-wave" would have the period of above "Megacycles" articles of mine mentioned period of megacycles about
429.4 million years, which is my brave strange speculation in this case.
Ofcourse existence of megacycle about 429.4 million years
must be observed also in geology of other planets and also properties (redshifts?)
in whole space before this period 429.4 million years of speculation could be true?
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas, Kolamäentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki / Oulu, Finland.
keskiviikko 21. joulukuuta 2022 klo 10.38.31 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:Finland.
maanantai 19. joulukuuta 2022 klo 12.43.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 26. heinäkuuta 2021 klo 15.42.53 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 10:55:43 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas,
TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.Simple approximate calculation of the length of the cosmic year
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes. <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
R0 = 7.92 +- 0.16 kpc ,(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model).
v0 = 227 km*s^(-1), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
1 pc = 3.26 ly,
1 ly = 9.460528436*10^15 m,
R0 = 7.92 kpc = 7.92*3.26*10^3*9.460528436*10^15 m = 2.442632758*10^20 m,
2*Pi*R0 = 1.534751426*10^21 m,
v0 = 227*10^3*m*s^(-1),
T0 = 2*Pi*R0/v0, (simple circular motion approximation for the length of cosmic year).
T0 = 1.534751426*10^21 / 227*10^3 s = 6.761019496*10^15 s =
= 6.761019496*10^15 / (365.2422*24*60*60) yrs = 214248354.8 yrs =
= approx. 214.25 Myrs.
(simplified error estimates , if R0 = 8.08 kpc, T0 = 218576604.4 yrs = approx. 219 Myrs and
if R0 = 7.76 kpc, T0 = 209920105.2 yrs = approx. 210 Myrs)
Reference:
VERA collaboration, Tomoya Hirota et al., 2020.
The First VERA Astronomy Catalog.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2020) 72 (4), 50 (1-19).
(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasONE SPECULATION OF MINE:
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Oulu / Kiiminki
Finland.
One very brave strange speculation of mine about time-dimension of the whole space:
If I speculate that whole space would be a kind of "mega-galaxy",
then I would speculate that this "mega-galaxy" has a center (inside black hole,
"H-M's big ball" and "H-M's color-forces center planet" instead of singularity).
This would be the origin of time dimension of the whole space.
Time-dimension would be formed from a "frozen time-wave",
which consists two kind of direction of flow of time,
one direction forwards time and other backwards of time.
(this speculation of mine is similar than H-M's color drawing of a black hole,
which is public visible in my Hannu Poropudas Facebook Page.)
Period of this "frozen time-wave" would have the period of above "Megacycles" articles of mine mentioned period of megacycles about
429.4 million years, which is my brave strange speculation in this case.
Ofcourse existence of megacycle about 429.4 million years
must be observed also in geology of other planets and also properties (redshifts?)
in whole space before this period 429.4 million years of speculation could be true?
Best Regards,WRONG TERM CORRECTION:
Hannu Poropudas, Kolamäentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki / Oulu, Finland.
"mega-galaxy" -> "metagalaxy"
HannuMORE SPECULATIONS OF MINE
(everything should be tested to see if these are true):
I have thought this "metagalaxy" and "time-wave" more closely:
I think that only observable physical phenomena for " time-wave"
could be such that this "time-wave" goes though all matter in "metagalaxy" periodically of cycles of 429.4 million years (this period is my guess) and "forwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave" would not have any significant
effect to physical matter but "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
could have some kind of warming effect interiors of planets,
like Earth, Venus, Mars for example,
which could increase VOLCANISM in those planets ?
In H-M's black hole (also galaxy as I have undestood) drawing
"time-wave" have (freezed?) cycles of oscillation of 100000-300000 years.
I do not know that would this second limit 300000 years period
be related to second kind on "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamod" shaped
"creation stone of the Universe" due she has drawn
two different kind of "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamond"
shaped "creation stone of the Universe" on one of her drawing
(both drawings are also public in Hannu Poropudas Facebook ).
As I look large-scale structure maps of the Universe, I have poorly understood
that "large void" areas could be those "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
and "supercluster" areas could be those "forwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"?
As I look Planck-Satellite 2013 results of cosmic backround radiation temperature
distribution maps, I see those "cold spots" and "warm spots" which I know both to be "light cones". And "warm spots" of these two are closer to the Big Bang start.
I have also poorly understood that these spots corresponds to present
size of "superclusters" and maybe (?) also present size of "large voids"?
OPEN QUESTION: Is our Universe much larger that we have ever expected due these
"hidden" cycle periods of 429.4 million years (my own guess) of time flow, if so, this would then look like structure of "pearls on ribbon"
each "pearl on ribbon" would correspond to a "metagalaxy" and
time-flow slice of 429.4 million years (my own guess)?
What we know (not much) presently about geology (VOLGANISM)
of Venus and Mars:
1. NASA's Magellan spacegraft mission discovered that
Venus has a geologically young surface with a relatively uniform age of 500+-200 Ma (million years).
Reference:
Geodynamics of Venus (Wikipedia 21.12.2022).
2. The Ages of Mars (Ga=billion years):
Pre-Noachian 4.5-4.1 Ga,
Noachian 4.1-3.7 Ga,
Hesperian 3.7-2.9 Ga,
Amazonian 2.9 Ga - present.
Reference:
https://sci.eas.int/web/mars-express/~/55481-the-ages_of_mars
Last Update 1 September 2019.
(21.12.2022)
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
keskiviikko 21. joulukuuta 2022 klo 10.38.31 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:Finland.
maanantai 19. joulukuuta 2022 klo 12.43.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 26. heinäkuuta 2021 klo 15.42.53 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 10:55:43 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas,
TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.Simple approximate calculation of the length of the cosmic year
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes. <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
R0 = 7.92 +- 0.16 kpc ,(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model).
v0 = 227 km*s^(-1), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
1 pc = 3.26 ly,
1 ly = 9.460528436*10^15 m,
R0 = 7.92 kpc = 7.92*3.26*10^3*9.460528436*10^15 m = 2.442632758*10^20 m,
2*Pi*R0 = 1.534751426*10^21 m,
v0 = 227*10^3*m*s^(-1),
T0 = 2*Pi*R0/v0, (simple circular motion approximation for the length of cosmic year).
T0 = 1.534751426*10^21 / 227*10^3 s = 6.761019496*10^15 s =
= 6.761019496*10^15 / (365.2422*24*60*60) yrs = 214248354.8 yrs =
= approx. 214.25 Myrs.
(simplified error estimates , if R0 = 8.08 kpc, T0 = 218576604.4 yrs = approx. 219 Myrs and
if R0 = 7.76 kpc, T0 = 209920105.2 yrs = approx. 210 Myrs)
Reference:
VERA collaboration, Tomoya Hirota et al., 2020.
The First VERA Astronomy Catalog.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2020) 72 (4), 50 (1-19).
(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasONE SPECULATION OF MINE:
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Oulu / Kiiminki
Finland.
One very brave strange speculation of mine about time-dimension of the whole space:
If I speculate that whole space would be a kind of "mega-galaxy",
then I would speculate that this "mega-galaxy" has a center (inside black hole,
"H-M's big ball" and "H-M's color-forces center planet" instead of singularity).
This would be the origin of time dimension of the whole space.
Time-dimension would be formed from a "frozen time-wave",
which consists two kind of direction of flow of time,
one direction forwards time and other backwards of time.
(this speculation of mine is similar than H-M's color drawing of a black hole,
which is public visible in my Hannu Poropudas Facebook Page.)
Period of this "frozen time-wave" would have the period of above "Megacycles" articles of mine mentioned period of megacycles about
429.4 million years, which is my brave strange speculation in this case.
Ofcourse existence of megacycle about 429.4 million years
must be observed also in geology of other planets and also properties (redshifts?)
in whole space before this period 429.4 million years of speculation could be true?
Best Regards,WRONG TERM CORRECTION:
Hannu Poropudas, Kolamäentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki / Oulu, Finland.
"mega-galaxy" -> "metagalaxy"
HannuMORE SPECULATIONS OF MINE
(everything should be tested to see if these are true):
I have thought this "metagalaxy" and "time-wave" more closely:
I think that only observable physical phenomena for " time-wave"
could be such that this "time-wave" goes though all matter in "metagalaxy" periodically of cycles of 429.4 million years (this period is my guess) and "forwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave" would not have any significant
effect to physical matter but "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
could have some kind of warming effect interiors of planets,
like Earth, Venus, Mars for example,
which could increase VOLCANISM in those planets ?
In H-M's black hole (also galaxy as I have undestood) drawing
"time-wave" have (freezed?) cycles of oscillation of 100000-300000 years.
I do not know that would this second limit 300000 years period
be related to second kind on "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamod" shaped
"creation stone of the Universe" due she has drawn
two different kind of "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamond"
shaped "creation stone of the Universe" on one of her drawing
(both drawings are also public in Hannu Poropudas Facebook ).
As I look large-scale structure maps of the Universe, I have poorly understood
that "large void" areas could be those "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
and "supercluster" areas could be those "forwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"?
As I look Planck-Satellite 2013 results of cosmic backround radiation temperature
distribution maps, I see those "cold spots" and "warm spots" which I know both to be "light cones". And "warm spots" of these two are closer to the Big Bang start.
I have also poorly understood that these spots corresponds to present
size of "superclusters" and maybe (?) also present size of "large voids"?
OPEN QUESTION: Is our Universe much larger that we have ever expected due these
"hidden" cycle periods of 429.4 million years (my own guess) of time flow, if so, this would then look like structure of "pearls on ribbon"
each "pearl on ribbon" would correspond to a "metagalaxy" and
time-flow slice of 429.4 million years (my own guess)?
What we know (not much) presently about geology (VOLGANISM)
of Venus and Mars:
1. NASA's Magellan spacegraft mission discovered that
Venus has a geologically young surface with a relatively uniform age of 500+-200 Ma (million years).
Reference:
Geodynamics of Venus (Wikipedia 21.12.2022).
2. The Ages of Mars (Ga=billion years):
Pre-Noachian 4.5-4.1 Ga,
Noachian 4.1-3.7 Ga,
Hesperian 3.7-2.9 Ga,
Amazonian 2.9 Ga - present.
Reference:
https://sci.eas.int/web/mars-express/~/55481-the-ages_of_mars
Last Update 1 September 2019.
(21.12.2022)
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
maanantai 19. joulukuuta 2022 klo 12.43.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:Finland.
maanantai 26. heinäkuuta 2021 klo 15.42.53 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 10:55:43 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas,
TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.Simple approximate calculation of the length of the cosmic year
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes. <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,
sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
R0 = 7.92 +- 0.16 kpc ,(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model).
v0 = 227 km*s^(-1), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
1 pc = 3.26 ly,
1 ly = 9.460528436*10^15 m,
R0 = 7.92 kpc = 7.92*3.26*10^3*9.460528436*10^15 m = 2.442632758*10^20 m,
2*Pi*R0 = 1.534751426*10^21 m,
v0 = 227*10^3*m*s^(-1),
T0 = 2*Pi*R0/v0, (simple circular motion approximation for the length of cosmic year).
T0 = 1.534751426*10^21 / 227*10^3 s = 6.761019496*10^15 s =
= 6.761019496*10^15 / (365.2422*24*60*60) yrs = 214248354.8 yrs =
= approx. 214.25 Myrs.
(simplified error estimates , if R0 = 8.08 kpc, T0 = 218576604.4 yrs = approx. 219 Myrs and
if R0 = 7.76 kpc, T0 = 209920105.2 yrs = approx. 210 Myrs)
Reference:
VERA collaboration, Tomoya Hirota et al., 2020.
The First VERA Astronomy Catalog.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2020) 72 (4), 50 (1-19).
(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasONE SPECULATION OF MINE:
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Oulu / Kiiminki
Finland.
One very brave strange speculation of mine about time-dimension of the whole space:
If I speculate that whole space would be a kind of "mega-galaxy",
then I would speculate that this "mega-galaxy" has a center (inside black hole,
"H-M's big ball" and "H-M's color-forces center planet" instead of singularity).
This would be the origin of time dimension of the whole space.
Time-dimension would be formed from a "frozen time-wave",
which consists two kind of direction of flow of time,
one direction forwards time and other backwards of time.
(this speculation of mine is similar than H-M's color drawing of a black hole,
which is public visible in my Hannu Poropudas Facebook Page.)
Period of this "frozen time-wave" would have the period of above "Megacycles" articles of mine mentioned period of megacycles about
429.4 million years, which is my brave strange speculation in this case.
Ofcourse existence of megacycle about 429.4 million years
must be observed also in geology of other planets and also properties (redshifts?)
in whole space before this period 429.4 million years of speculation could be true?
Best Regards,WRONG TERM CORRECTION:
Hannu Poropudas, Kolamäentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki / Oulu, Finland.
"mega-galaxy" -> "metagalaxy"
Hannu
keskiviikko 21. joulukuuta 2022 klo 10.38.31 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:Finland.
maanantai 19. joulukuuta 2022 klo 12.43.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 26. heinäkuuta 2021 klo 15.42.53 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 10:55:43 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas,
TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.Simple approximate calculation of the length of the cosmic year
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes. <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
R0 = 7.92 +- 0.16 kpc ,(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model).
v0 = 227 km*s^(-1), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
1 pc = 3.26 ly,
1 ly = 9.460528436*10^15 m,
R0 = 7.92 kpc = 7.92*3.26*10^3*9.460528436*10^15 m = 2.442632758*10^20 m,
2*Pi*R0 = 1.534751426*10^21 m,
v0 = 227*10^3*m*s^(-1),
T0 = 2*Pi*R0/v0, (simple circular motion approximation for the length of cosmic year).
T0 = 1.534751426*10^21 / 227*10^3 s = 6.761019496*10^15 s =
= 6.761019496*10^15 / (365.2422*24*60*60) yrs = 214248354.8 yrs =
= approx. 214.25 Myrs.
(simplified error estimates , if R0 = 8.08 kpc, T0 = 218576604.4 yrs = approx. 219 Myrs and
if R0 = 7.76 kpc, T0 = 209920105.2 yrs = approx. 210 Myrs)
Reference:
VERA collaboration, Tomoya Hirota et al., 2020.
The First VERA Astronomy Catalog.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2020) 72 (4), 50 (1-19).
(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasONE SPECULATION OF MINE:
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Oulu / Kiiminki
Finland.
One very brave strange speculation of mine about time-dimension of the whole space:
If I speculate that whole space would be a kind of "mega-galaxy",
then I would speculate that this "mega-galaxy" has a center (inside black hole,
"H-M's big ball" and "H-M's color-forces center planet" instead of singularity).
This would be the origin of time dimension of the whole space.
Time-dimension would be formed from a "frozen time-wave",
which consists two kind of direction of flow of time,
one direction forwards time and other backwards of time.
(this speculation of mine is similar than H-M's color drawing of a black hole,
which is public visible in my Hannu Poropudas Facebook Page.)
Period of this "frozen time-wave" would have the period of above "Megacycles" articles of mine mentioned period of megacycles about
429.4 million years, which is my brave strange speculation in this case.
Ofcourse existence of megacycle about 429.4 million years
must be observed also in geology of other planets and also properties (redshifts?)
in whole space before this period 429.4 million years of speculation could be true?
Best Regards,WRONG TERM CORRECTION:
Hannu Poropudas, Kolamäentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki / Oulu, Finland.
"mega-galaxy" -> "metagalaxy"
HannuMORE SPECULATIONS OF MINE
(everything should be tested to see if these are true):
I have thought this "metagalaxy" and "time-wave" more closely:
I think that only observable physical phenomena for " time-wave"
could be such that this "time-wave" goes though all matter in "metagalaxy" periodically of cycles of 429.4 million years (this period is my guess) and "forwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave" would not have any significant
effect to physical matter but "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
could have some kind of warming effect interiors of planets,
like Earth, Venus, Mars for example,
which could increase VOLCANISM in those planets ?
In H-M's black hole (also galaxy as I have undestood) drawing
"time-wave" have (freezed?) cycles of oscillation of 100000-300000 years.
I do not know that would this second limit 300000 years period
be related to second kind on "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamod" shaped
"creation stone of the Universe" due she has drawn
two different kind of "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamond"
shaped "creation stone of the Universe" on one of her drawing
(both drawings are also public in Hannu Poropudas Facebook ).
As I look large-scale structure maps of the Universe, I have poorly understood
that "large void" areas could be those "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
and "supercluster" areas could be those "forwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"?
As I look Planck-Satellite 2013 results of cosmic backround radiation temperature
distribution maps, I see those "cold spots" and "warm spots" which I know both to be "light cones". And "warm spots" of these two are closer to the Big Bang start.
I have also poorly understood that these spots corresponds to present
size of "superclusters" and maybe (?) also present size of "large voids"?
OPEN QUESTION: Is our Universe much larger that we have ever expected due these
"hidden" cycle periods of 429.4 million years (my own guess) of time flow, if so, this would then look like structure of "pearls on ribbon"
each "pearl on ribbon" would correspond to a "metagalaxy" and
time-flow slice of 429.4 million years (my own guess)?
What we know (not much) presently about geology (VOLGANISM)
of Venus and Mars:
1. NASA's Magellan spacegraft mission discovered that
Venus has a geologically young surface with a relatively uniform age of 500+-200 Ma (million years).
Reference:
Geodynamics of Venus (Wikipedia 21.12.2022).
2. The Ages of Mars (Ga=billion years):
Pre-Noachian 4.5-4.1 Ga,
Noachian 4.1-3.7 Ga,
Hesperian 3.7-2.9 Ga,
Amazonian 2.9 Ga - present.
Reference:
https://sci.eas.int/web/mars-express/~/55481-the-ages_of_mars
Last Update 1 September 2019.
(21.12.2022)
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
On Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 1:45:31 PM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 10:52:31 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
Period of megacycle 429.4 Ma is taken from reference 1.
Megacycles
(4620 - 4390 Ma)
4390 - 4190 Ma
4190 - 3960 Ma
3960 - 3760 Ma
3760 - 3540 Ma
3540 - 3330 Ma
3330 - 3110 Ma
3110 - 2900 Ma
2900 - 2680 Ma
2680 - 2470 Ma
2470 - 2250 Ma
2250 - 2040 Ma
2040 - 1820 Ma
1820 - 1620 Ma
1620 - 1390 Ma
1390 - 1190 Ma
1190 - 970 Ma
970 - 760 Ma
760 - 540 Ma
540 - 340 Ma
340 - 130 Ma
130 -
(Earth's age is approximated to be between about 4570 - 4450 Ma).
Approximately same set is achieved if one takes starting point
about 2680 Ma for breakup of the Pilbara continent ref. 2) and
then if one adds to this number 2680 Ma periodically
429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma uppwads of the list and secondly if one
subracts from this number 2680 Ma periodically 429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma downwards of the list.
(I put below misc references of Kapez B and Krapez B et al about the subject.
I'am not sure about existence of 2nd and 3rd order of cyclicities proposed by Krapez B and also I do not agreee his about period of
about 360 Ma. Also some causes of 2nd order and 3rd order cylicities are questionable in my opinion.)
References:
1. Poropudas Hannu, 1996.
Harrastelijan ajatuksia päivän, kuukauden ja vuoden pituudesta muinaisina aikoina.
GEOLOGI 48, 4-5/1996, 92-96.
2. Kapez B, Eisenlohr B, 1998.
Precambrian Research, vol. 88. Pages 173-205, (2680 Ma on page 204).
3. Krapez B, 1993.
Precambrian Research, vol. 60. Pages 1-45.
4. Krapez B, 1996.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 43. Pages 355-380.
5. Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 1-36.
6. Horowitz R C and Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 879-886.
7. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 71-87.
8. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 89-103.
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
Kolamäentie 9E
Kiiminki / Oulu
Finland
References:
1. Poropudas Hannu, 1996.
Harrastelijan ajatuksia päivän, kuukauden ja vuoden pituudesta muinaisina aikoina.
GEOLOGI 48, 4-5/1996, 92-96.
http://elektra.helsinki.fi/se/g/0046-5720/48/4-5/harraste.pdfNewsgroups: sci.astro
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52ca9eb0-4d5a-4a5d...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps Earth and
Moon formed as a planet couple ?
From: Hannu Poropudas <hanp...@luukku.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 06:53:44 +0000
(----COPY BELOW----)
Linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps Earth and Moon formed as a planet couple ?
2 posts by 2 authors
me (Hannu Poropudas change)
Apr 27
How to calculate with my extrapolated fossil data of Pannella G.:
T’ = length of the month recorded by marine life (= synodic month)
t’ = length of the day recorded by marine life (= solar day)
T = length of sidereal month
t = length of sidereal day
T = T’ /(1+T’/Y)
t = t’ /(1+t’/Y), this is very nearly equal to t’
S = T’ / t’ = number of days in month recorded in paleontological specimens.
Y = length of the year (= tropical year, this is assumed to be constant = 365,2422 days = not changed significantly)
Reference:
Runcorn, S. K., 1970.
Paleontological Measurements of the Changes in the Rotation Rates of Earth and Moon and
of the Rate of Retreat of the Moon from the Earth., pages 17-23, page 21. In:
Runcorn S.K. (Editor), 1970.
Paleogeophysics.
Academic Press Inc., Printed in Great Britain, 518 pages, pages 17-23.
For example
(figures from my drawings one example out of range of experimental
test points for curiosity):
-4600*10^4 centuries (approx.. Earth’s formation time, 4600 Ma ago)
11 hours/day (present hours, assumption Earth and Sun distance have not significantly changed, Y = 365,2422 days, solar days and tropical year)
Y = 780 * 11 h = 8580 h (present hours) = 357,5 days (present solar days, Y changed little (?) in data of tables it is used Y=365,2422 days)
780 days/year (solar days and tropical year)
48 days/month (solar days and synodic month) = T’
T = T’ /(1+T’/Y) = 48 / (1 + 48/357,5) = 42,31812577 =
= approx. 42 days/sidereal month
Distance approximately between Earth and Moon at approx. 4600 Ma ago.
G = 6,67*10^(-11)*N*m^^2/kg^2
M = 5,974*10^24 kg
P = 42,31812577*11*60*60 s (present seconds) = 1675797,781 s
r = ( G*M*P^2/(4*Pi^2) )^()1/3 = 304832464,1 m =
= approx. 305000 km.
So linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps
Earth and Moon formed as a planet couple ?
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
_________________COPIES OF MY OLD ARTICLES BELOW (long)_________________
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
1 kirjoittajan 2 viestiä
mathematician
13.12.2008
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki,
Finland, Date: 12.12.2008)
Three rough data set (TABLE 1, days/month, TABLE 2, days/year and
TABLE 3, months/year)
are given in this paper for test purposes of ancient fossil time data. Numbers are based
on Giorgio Pannella’s (1972) fossil time data. Interpretations are my
own.
These linear extrapolations are based also on uncertain assumption of existence of
oscillation about 429.4 Ma in Pannella’s Figure 3 (days/month). Many
ages and fossil
points are still uncertain. Main intended area of use of these figures
is about 0-2000 Ma.
Tables of fossil time data
TABLE 1
-T/10^4 Days/Month
centuries
----------------------------
0 29,16
18,6 29,4
31,4 29,69
45,4 29,83
58,1 30,05
74,4 29,95
206,9 29,67
291,9 30,09
342,2 30,36
380,3 30,57
416,7 30,55
429,4 30,98
448 31,22
460,8 31,51
467,6 31,24
474,8 31,65
487,5 31,87
503,8 31,77
639 31,49
721,3 31,91
771,6 32,18
809,7 32,39
846,1 32,37
858,8 32,81
877,4 33,05
890,2 33,34
897 33,06
904,2 33,48
916,9 33,7
933,2 33,6
1068,4 33,32
1150,7 33,74
1201 34,01
1239,1 34,22
1275,5 34,2
1288,2 34,63
1306,8 34,87
1319,6 35,16
1326,4 34,89
1333,6 35,3
1346,3 35,52
1362,6 35,42
1497,8 35,14
1580,1 35,56
1630,4 35,83
1668,5 36,04
1704,9 36,02
1717,6 36,46
1736,2 36,7
1749 36,99
1755,8 36,71
1763 37,13
1775,7 37,35
1792 37,25
1927,2 36,97
2009,5 37,39
-----------------------
2059,8 37,66
2097,9 37,87
2134,3 37,85
2147 38,28
2165,6 38,52
2178,4 38,81
2185,2 38,54
2192,4 38,95
2205,1 39,17
2221,4 39,07
2356,6 38,79
2438,9 39,21
2489,2 39,48
2527,3 39,69
2563,7 39,67
2576,4 40,11
2595 40,35
2607,8 40,64
2614,6 40,36
2621,8 40,78
2634,5 41
2650,8 40,9
2786 40,62
2868,3 41,04
2918,6 41,31
2956,7 41,52
2993,1 41,5
3005,8 41,93
3024,4 42,17
3037,2 42,46
3044 42,19
3051,2 42,6
3063,9 42,82
3080,2 42,72
3215,4 42,44
3297,7 42,86
3348 43,13
3386,1 43,34
3422,5 43,32
3435,2 43,76
3453,8 44
3466,6 44,29
3473,4 44,01
3480,6 44,43
3493,3 44,65
3509,6 44,55
3644,8 44,27
3727,1 44,69
3777,4 44,96
3815,5 45,17
-----------------------
3851,9 45,15
3864,6 45,58
3883,2 45,82
3896 46,11
3902,8 45,84
3910 46,25
3922,7 46,47
3939 46,37
4074,2 46,09
4156,5 46,51
4206,8 46,78
4244,9 46,99
4281,3 46,97
4294 47,41
4312,6 47,65
4325,4 47,94
4332,2 47,66
4339,4 48,08
4352,1 48,3
4368,4 48,2
4503,6 47,92
-----------------------
(4585,9 48,34
4636,2 48,61
4674,3 48,82
4710,7 48,8
4761,6 49,49)
TABLE 2
-T/10^4 Days/Year
centuries
---------------------------
0 364,76
52,2 370,95
52,2 374,76
226,2 370,95
276,9 381,46
276,9 391,22
335,6 393,66
340,2 397,56
340,2 400,16
367,8 400,65
367,8 404,52
367,8 412,26
394,5 400,65
408,2 418,06
429,4 404,09
435,8 413,23
445 424
481,6 410,28
481,6 414,09
558,1 431,76
655,6 410,28
706,3 420,79
706,3 430,55
765 432,99
769,6 436,89
769,6 439,49
797,2 439,98
797,2 443,85
797,2 451,59
823,9 439,98
837,6 457,39
858,8 443,42
865,2 452,56
874,4 463,33
911 449,61
911 453,42
987,5 471,09
1085 449,61
1135,7 460,12
1135,7 469,88
1194,4 472,32
1199 476,22
1199 478,82
1226,6 479,31
1226,6 483,18
1226,6 490,92
1253,3 479,31
1267 496,72
1288,2 482,75
1294,6 491,89
1303,8 502,66
1340,4 488,94
1340,4 492,75
1416,9 510,42
1514,4 488,94
1565,1 499,45
1565,1 509,21
1623,8 511,65
1628,4 515,55
1628,4 518,15
1656 518,64
1656 522,51
1656 530,25
1682,7 518,64
1696,4 536,05
1717,6 522,08
1724 531,22
1733,2 541,99
1769,8 528,27
1769,8 532,08
1846,3 549,75
1943,8 528,27
1994,5 538,78
1994,5 548,54
-------------------------
2053,2 550,98
2057,8 554,88
2057,8 557,48
2085,4 557,97
2085,4 561,84
2085,4 569,58
2112,1 557,97
2125,8 575,38
2147 561,41
2153,4 570,55
2162,6 581,32
2199,2 567,6
2199,2 571,41
2275,7 589,08
2373,2 567,6
2423,9 578,11
2423,9 587,87
2482,6 590,31
2487,2 594,21
2487,2 596,81
2514,8 597,3
2514,8 601,17
2514,8 608,91
2541,5 597,3
2555,2 614,71
2576,4 600,75
2582,8 609,88
2592 620,65
2628,6 606,94
2628,6 610,75
2705,1 628,41
2802,6 606,94
2853,3 617,45
2853,3 627,21
2912 629,65
2916,6 633,55
2916,6 636,15
2944,2 636,64
2944,2 640,51
2944,2 648,25
2970,9 636,64
2984,6 654,05
3005,8 640,08
3012,2 649,22
3021,4 659,99
3058 646,27
3058 650,08
3134,5 667,75
3232 646,27
3282,7 656,78
3282,7 666,54
3341,4 668,98
3346 672,88
3346 675,48
3373,6 675,97
3373,6 679,84
3373,6 687,58
3400,3 675,97
3414 693,38
3435,2 679,41
3441,6 688,55
3450,8 699,32
3487,4 685,6
3487,4 689,41
3563,9 707,08
3661,4 685,6
3712,1 696,11
3712,1 705,87
3770,8 708,31
3775,4 712,21
3775,4 714,81
3803 715,3
3803 719,17
3803 726,91
-------------------------
3829,7 715,3
3843,4 732,71
3864,6 718,74
3871 727,88
3880,2 738,65
3916,8 724,93
3916,8 728,74
3993,3 746,41
4090,8 724,93
4141,5 735,44
4141,5 745,2
4200,2 747,64
4204,8 751,54
4204,8 754,14
4232,4 754,63
4232,4 758,5
4232,4 766,24
4259,1 754,63
4272,8 772,04
4294 758,07
4300,4 767,21
4309,6 777,98
4346,2 764,26
4346,2 768,07
4422,7 785,74
4520,2 764,26
-------------------------
(4570,9 774,77
4570,9 784,53
4629,6 786,97
4634,2 790,87
4634,2 793,47
4661,8 793,96
4661,8 797,83
4661,8 805,57
4688,5 793,96
4702,2 811,37
4723,4 797,4
4729,8 806,54
4739 817,31
4775,6 803,59
4775,6 807,4
4852,1 825,07)
TABLE 3
-T/10^4 Months/Year
centuries
------------------------------
0 12,34
70 12,49
70 12,6
160,7 11,56
220 12,55
290 12,71
340 13,11
360 12,93
360 13,35
429,4 12,95
499,4 13,1
499,4 13,21
510 13
590,1 12,17
649,4 13,16
719,4 13,32
769,4 13,72
789,4 13,54
789,4 13,96
858,8 13,56
928,8 13,71
928,8 13,82
939,4 13,61
1019,5 12,78
1078,8 13,77
1148,8 13,93
1198,8 14,33
1218,8 14,15
1218,8 14,57
1288,2 14,17
1358,2 14,32
1358,2 14,43
1368,8 14,22
1448,9 13,39
1508,2 14,38
1578,2 14,54
1628,2 14,94
1648,2 14,76
1648,2 15,18
1717,6 14,78
1787,6 14,93
1787,6 15,04
1798,2 14,83
1878,3 14
1937,6 14,99
2007,6 15,15
------------------------
2057,6 15,55
2077,6 15,37
2077,6 15,79
2147 15,39
2217 15,54
2217 15,65
2227,6 15,44
2307,7 14,61
2367 15,6
2437 15,76
2487 16,16
2507 15,98
2507 16,4
2576,4 16
2646,4 16,15
2646,4 16,26
2657 16,05
2737,1 15,22
2796,4 16,21
2866,4 16,37
2916,4 16,77
2936,4 16,59
2936,4 17,01
3005,8 16,61
3075,8 16,76
3075,8 16,87
3086,4 16,66
3166,5 15,83
3225,8 16,82
3295,8 16,98
3345,8 17,38
3365,8 17,2
3365,8 17,62
3435,2 17,22
3505,2 17,37
3505,2 17,48
3515,8 17,27
3595,9 16,44
3655,2 17,43
3725,2 17,59
3775,2 17,99
3795,2 17,81
3795,2 18,23
------------------------
3864,6 17,83
3934,6 17,98
3934,6 18,09
3945,2 17,88
4025,3 17,05
4084,6 18,04
4154,6 18,2
4204,6 18,6
4224,6 18,42
4224,6 18,84
4294 18,44
4364 18,59
4364 18,7
4374,6 18,49
4454,7 17,66
4514 18,65
-----------------------
(4584 18,81
4634 19,21
4654 19,03
4654 19,45
4723,4 19,05
4793,4 19,2
4793,4 19,31
4804 19,1
4884,1 18,27
4943,4 19,26)
References:
Pannella Giorgio, 1972.
Paleontological Evidence on the Earth’s Rotational History Since Early Precambrian.
Astrophysics and Space Science, 16, (1972), 212-237.
(Figure 3 on page 235 and Figure 4 on page 236. Mean solar day,
Synodic Month, Tropical Year.
Exact age of sedimentation of the Gunflint Formation is 1878.3+-1.3
Ma, YPM-IP-28510/28511.)
Scrutton, C.T., (1964), 1965.
Periodicity in Devonian Coral Growth.
Paleontology, volume 7, part 4, pages 552-558, plates 86-87.
(Middle Devonian OUM DT2 fossil, age is 385.3 Ma – 397.5 Ma, GT2004, approximate linear formula 12.37 – 1.43*10^(-7)*T, months/year, T=centuries,
past time minus signed).
Scrutton, C.T., 1970.
Evidence for a monthly periodicity in the growth of some corals.
In:
Runcorn, S.K. (editor), 1970.
Paleogeophysics. Academic Press, London, pages 11-16.
Fralick, P., Davis, D.W., Kissin, S.A., 2002.
The age of the Gunflint Formation, Ontario, Canada: single zircon U-Pb
age determinations
from reworked volcanic ash.
Can. J. Earth Sci., 39, 1085-1091.
From: mathematician <hapo...@luukku.com>
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <533c8763-511e-4ec6...@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:46:50 +0000 (UTC)
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's fossil time data
1 kirjoittajan 2 viestiä
mathematician
14.1.2009
Muut vastaanottajat: george....@adelaide.edu.au
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's
fossil time data ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Author: H.K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki, Finland.
Date: 13.1.2009)
Below are few rough estimations of ancient time data. It should be remembered that
these linear extrapolations are based on my uncertain assumption of existence of
oscillation of period 429.4 Ma in Pannella's figure 3 (reference 2)
and ages
and data of fossils and stromatolites are in many cases uncertain
too.
The Elatina Formation and Reynella Siltstone -----------------------------------------------------------------
620 Ma:
-----------
655.6 Ma, 410.28 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give roughly approx. 412 days/year)
639 Ma, 31.49 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give roughly approx. 31.7 days/month) 410.28/31.49 = 13.03 months/year, (primary value = 13.1 +-0.1 months/
year)
649.4 Ma, 13.16 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(primary value = 13.1 +-0.1 months/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 412/31.7 = 13.0 months/year)
(13.0-13.2 months/year)
The Big Cottonwood Formation
--------------------------------------------
900 Ma:
-----------
890.2 Ma, 33.34 days/month
897 Ma, 33.06 days/month
904.2 Ma, 33.48 days/month
(33-33.5 days/month, average = 33.29 days/month)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 33.4 days/month)
874.4 Ma, 463.33 days/year
911 Ma, 449.61 days/year
911 Ma, 453.42 days/year
(450-463 days/year, average = 455.45 days/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 451 days/year)
455.45/33.29 = 13.68 months/year, (primary value 13.5 months/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 451/33.4 = 13.5 months/year)
928.8 Ma, 13.71 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
928.8 Ma, 13.82 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(13.7-13.8 months/year, primary value 13.5 months/year)
(13.5-13.8 months/year)
The Weeli Wolli Formation
--------------------------------------
2450 Ma:
-------------
2438.9 Ma, 39.21 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 39.2 days/month)
2423.9 Ma, 587.87 days/year
2423.9 Ma, 578.11 days/year
(578-588 days/year, average = 582.99 days/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 585 days/year)
582.99/39.21 = 14.87 months/year, (primary value = 14.5 +-0.5 months/
year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 585/39.2 = 14.9 months/year)
2437 Ma, 15.76 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(primary value = 14.5 +-0.5 months/year)
(14.9-15.8 months/year)
Reference (1).
The Gunflint Formation
------------------
1878.3 +-1.3 Ma:
------------------------
1927.2 Ma, 36.97 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 37.2 days/month)
1846.3 Ma, 549.75 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 533 days/year)
549.75/36.97 = 14.87 months/year (primary value = 14 months/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 533/37.2 = 14.3 months/year)
1937.6 Ma, 14.99 monnths/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(14.3-15.0 months/year)
Age of the Bulawayan stromatolite UCLA-Bul-7 ? ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mode = 10-20-40, Highest Count = 41.
2576.6.4 Ma, 40.11 days/month
2595 Ma, 40.35 days/month
2607.8 Ma, 40.64 days/month
2614.6 Ma, 40.34 days/month
2621.8 Ma, 40.78 days/month
2634.5 Ma, 41 days/month
2650.8 Ma, 40.9 days/month
2786 Ma, 40.62 days/month
2868.3 Ma, 41.04 days/month
So age of the Bulawayan Stromatolite UCLA-Bul-7 could be:
2580 Ma - 2870 Ma.
(primary value of the age =
(2672 +- 12 Ma - 2715 +- 15 Ma), Upper Bulawayan Group or
(2831 +- 6 Ma - 2904 +- 9 Ma), Lower Bulawayan Group. These both
are not local age determinations from the Bubi Greenstone Belt near
Huntsman Quarries, Zimbabwe.)
Other Time Data for UCLA-Bul-7 stromatolite: -----------------------------------------------------------------
(40-41 days/month, primary value)
(average = 40.5 days/month, primary value)
2576.4 Ma, 600.75 days/year
2582.8 Ma, 609.88 days/year
2592 Ma, 620.65 days/year
2628.6 Ma, 606.94 days/year
2628.6 Ma, 610.75 days/year
2705.1 Ma, 628.41 days/year
2802.6 Ma, 606.94 days/year
2853.3 Ma, 617.45 days/year
2853.3 Ma, 627.21 days/year
2912 Ma, 629.65 days/year
2916.6 Ma, 633.55 days/year
2916.6 Ma, 636.15 days/year
(average = 7428.33/12 = 619.03 = approx. 619 days/year)
(601-636 days/year)
619/40.5 = 15.3 months/year
OUM-DT2 based estimation:
2576.4 Ma, 16 months/year
2646.4 Ma, 16.15 months/year
2646.4 Ma, 16.26 months/year
2657 Ma, 16.05 months/year
2737.1 Ma, 15.22 months/year
2796.4 Ma, 16.21 months/year
2866.4 Ma, 16.37 months/year
2916.4 Ma, 16.77 months/year
(average = 129.03/8 = 16.13 = approx. 16.1 months/year)
(15.2 - 16.8 months/year)
References (2 and 3).
The Moodies Group
----------------------------
3225 Ma:
-------------
3215.4 Ma, 42.44 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure roughly gives approx. 42.8 days/month)
3232 Ma, 646.27 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figure roughly gives approx. 650 days/year)
646.27/42.44 = 15.23 months/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 650/42.8 = 15.2 months/year)
3225.8 Ma, 16.82 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(15.2-16.8 months/year)
Reference (4).
REFERENCES:
1. Williams, G.E. 2000.
Reviews of Geophysics, 38, 1/February 2000, pages 37-59.
2. Pannella, G., 1972.
Astrophysics and Space Science, 16, (1972), 212-237.
3. Fralick,P., Davis,D.W., Kissin,S.A., 2002.
Can. J. Earth Sci., 39, 1085-1091.
4. Eriksson,K.A., Simpson,E.L., Mueller,W., 2006.
Sedimentary Geology 190 (2006), 13-24.
5. Poropudas Hannu, 2009. Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella's Fossil Time Data for Test
Purposes.
<533c8763-511e-4ec6...@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
sci.bio.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,
sci.math.
Sat, 13 Dec 2008, 10 pages.
(I have drawn four extrapolated figures (0-1200 Ma, days/year, 0-4600
Ma, days/year,
0-1200 Ma days/month, 0-4600 Ma, days/month) but unfortunately they
are not possible
to give here due this text is in ASCII-format. I could send them via
email by request.
My email address:
hanporop
(at)
luukku.com )
From: mathematician <hapo...@luukku.com>
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's fossil time data
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <c91312bb-c2b7-4672...@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:52:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: george....@adelaide.edu.au
Re: Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated
Pannella's fossil time data
Hannu Poropudas
21.1.2009
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Earth's Rotational History from Linear
Extarpolation of Pannella's Ancient Time
Data of Fossils
----------------------------------------
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes.
<533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,
sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
On Jan 14, 7:52 am, mathematician <hapor...@luukku.com> wrote:
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's- näytä lainattu teksti -
fossil time data ---------------------------------------------------------------------------¬---------------------------------------------
<533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1...@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
sci.bio.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,
sci.math.
Sat, 13 Dec 2008, 10 pages.
(I have drawn four extrapolated figures (0-1200 Ma, days/year, 0-4600
Ma, days/year,
0-1200 Ma days/month, 0-4600 Ma, days/month) but unfortunately they
are not possible
to give here due this text is in ASCII-format. I could send them via
email by request.
My email address:
hanporop
(at)
luukku.com )
From: mathematician <hapo...@luukku.com>
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Re: Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's fossil time data
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:19:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <23d6c001-7a3b-4565...@r10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
References: <c91312bb-c2b7-4672...@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:19:37 +0000 (UTC)
tiistai 29. elokuuta 2017 klo 9.10.59 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
On Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 1:45:31 PM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 10:52:31 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
Period of megacycle 429.4 Ma is taken from reference 1.
Megacycles
(4620 - 4390 Ma)
4390 - 4190 Ma
4190 - 3960 Ma
3960 - 3760 Ma
3760 - 3540 Ma
3540 - 3330 Ma
3330 - 3110 Ma
3110 - 2900 Ma
2900 - 2680 Ma
2680 - 2470 Ma
2470 - 2250 Ma
2250 - 2040 Ma
2040 - 1820 Ma
1820 - 1620 Ma
1620 - 1390 Ma
1390 - 1190 Ma
1190 - 970 Ma
970 - 760 Ma
760 - 540 Ma
540 - 340 Ma
340 - 130 Ma
130 -
(Earth's age is approximated to be between about 4570 - 4450 Ma).
Approximately same set is achieved if one takes starting point
about 2680 Ma for breakup of the Pilbara continent ref. 2) and
then if one adds to this number 2680 Ma periodically
429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma uppwads of the list and secondly if one
subracts from this number 2680 Ma periodically 429.4 Ma/2 = 214.7 Ma downwards of the list.
(I put below misc references of Kapez B and Krapez B et al about the subject.
I'am not sure about existence of 2nd and 3rd order of cyclicities proposed by Krapez B and also I do not agreee his about period of about 360 Ma. Also some causes of 2nd order and 3rd order cylicities are questionable in my opinion.)
References:
1. Poropudas Hannu, 1996.
Harrastelijan ajatuksia päivän, kuukauden ja vuoden pituudesta muinaisina aikoina.
GEOLOGI 48, 4-5/1996, 92-96.
2. Kapez B, Eisenlohr B, 1998.
Precambrian Research, vol. 88. Pages 173-205, (2680 Ma on page 204).
3. Krapez B, 1993.
Precambrian Research, vol. 60. Pages 1-45.
4. Krapez B, 1996.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 43. Pages 355-380.
5. Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 1-36.
6. Horowitz R C and Krapez B, 1997.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 44. Pages 879-886.
7. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 71-87.
8. Krapez B, 1999.
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, vol. 46. Pages 89-103.
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
Kolamäentie 9E
Kiiminki / Oulu
Finland
References:
1. Poropudas Hannu, 1996.
Harrastelijan ajatuksia päivän, kuukauden ja vuoden pituudesta muinaisina aikoina.
GEOLOGI 48, 4-5/1996, 92-96.
http://elektra.helsinki.fi/se/g/0046-5720/48/4-5/harraste.pdfNewsgroups: sci.astro
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52ca9eb0-4d5a-4a5d...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps Earth and
Moon formed as a planet couple ?
From: Hannu Poropudas <hanp...@luukku.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 06:53:44 +0000
(----COPY BELOW----)
Linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps Earth and Moon formed as a planet couple ?
2 posts by 2 authors
me (Hannu Poropudas change)
Apr 27
How to calculate with my extrapolated fossil data of Pannella G.:
T’ = length of the month recorded by marine life (= synodic month)
t’ = length of the day recorded by marine life (= solar day)
T = length of sidereal month
t = length of sidereal day
T = T’ /(1+T’/Y)
t = t’ /(1+t’/Y), this is very nearly equal to t’
S = T’ / t’ = number of days in month recorded in paleontological specimens.
Y = length of the year (= tropical year, this is assumed to be constant = 365,2422 days = not changed significantly)
Reference:
Runcorn, S. K., 1970.
Paleontological Measurements of the Changes in the Rotation Rates of Earth and Moon and
of the Rate of Retreat of the Moon from the Earth., pages 17-23, page 21. In:
Runcorn S.K. (Editor), 1970.
Paleogeophysics.
Academic Press Inc., Printed in Great Britain, 518 pages, pages 17-23.
For example
(figures from my drawings one example out of range of experimental
test points for curiosity):
-4600*10^4 centuries (approx.. Earth’s formation time, 4600 Ma ago)
11 hours/day (present hours, assumption Earth and Sun distance have not significantly changed, Y = 365,2422 days, solar days and tropical year)
Y = 780 * 11 h = 8580 h (present hours) = 357,5 days (present solar days, Y changed little (?) in data of tables it is used Y=365,2422 days)
780 days/year (solar days and tropical year)
48 days/month (solar days and synodic month) = T’
T = T’ /(1+T’/Y) = 48 / (1 + 48/357,5) = 42,31812577 =
= approx. 42 days/sidereal month
Distance approximately between Earth and Moon at approx. 4600 Ma ago.
G = 6,67*10^(-11)*N*m^^2/kg^2
M = 5,974*10^24 kg
P = 42,31812577*11*60*60 s (present seconds) = 1675797,781 s
r = ( G*M*P^2/(4*Pi^2) )^()1/3 = 304832464,1 m =
= approx. 305000 km.
So linear extrapolated fossil data tries to tell that perhaps
Earth and Moon formed as a planet couple ?
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
_________________COPIES OF MY OLD ARTICLES BELOW (long)_________________
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
1 kirjoittajan 2 viestiä
mathematician
13.12.2008
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki,
Finland, Date: 12.12.2008)
Three rough data set (TABLE 1, days/month, TABLE 2, days/year and
TABLE 3, months/year)
are given in this paper for test purposes of ancient fossil time data. Numbers are based
on Giorgio Pannella’s (1972) fossil time data. Interpretations are my own.
These linear extrapolations are based also on uncertain assumption of existence of
oscillation about 429.4 Ma in Pannella’s Figure 3 (days/month). Many ages and fossil
points are still uncertain. Main intended area of use of these figures
is about 0-2000 Ma.
Tables of fossil time data
TABLE 1
-T/10^4 Days/Month
centuries
----------------------------
0 29,16
18,6 29,4
31,4 29,69
45,4 29,83
58,1 30,05
74,4 29,95
206,9 29,67
291,9 30,09
342,2 30,36
380,3 30,57
416,7 30,55
429,4 30,98
448 31,22
460,8 31,51
467,6 31,24
474,8 31,65
487,5 31,87
503,8 31,77
639 31,49
721,3 31,91
771,6 32,18
809,7 32,39
846,1 32,37
858,8 32,81
877,4 33,05
890,2 33,34
897 33,06
904,2 33,48
916,9 33,7
933,2 33,6
1068,4 33,32
1150,7 33,74
1201 34,01
1239,1 34,22
1275,5 34,2
1288,2 34,63
1306,8 34,87
1319,6 35,16
1326,4 34,89
1333,6 35,3
1346,3 35,52
1362,6 35,42
1497,8 35,14
1580,1 35,56
1630,4 35,83
1668,5 36,04
1704,9 36,02
1717,6 36,46
1736,2 36,7
1749 36,99
1755,8 36,71
1763 37,13
1775,7 37,35
1792 37,25
1927,2 36,97
2009,5 37,39
-----------------------
2059,8 37,66
2097,9 37,87
2134,3 37,85
2147 38,28
2165,6 38,52
2178,4 38,81
2185,2 38,54
2192,4 38,95
2205,1 39,17
2221,4 39,07
2356,6 38,79
2438,9 39,21
2489,2 39,48
2527,3 39,69
2563,7 39,67
2576,4 40,11
2595 40,35
2607,8 40,64
2614,6 40,36
2621,8 40,78
2634,5 41
2650,8 40,9
2786 40,62
2868,3 41,04
2918,6 41,31
2956,7 41,52
2993,1 41,5
3005,8 41,93
3024,4 42,17
3037,2 42,46
3044 42,19
3051,2 42,6
3063,9 42,82
3080,2 42,72
3215,4 42,44
3297,7 42,86
3348 43,13
3386,1 43,34
3422,5 43,32
3435,2 43,76
3453,8 44
3466,6 44,29
3473,4 44,01
3480,6 44,43
3493,3 44,65
3509,6 44,55
3644,8 44,27
3727,1 44,69
3777,4 44,96
3815,5 45,17
-----------------------
3851,9 45,15
3864,6 45,58
3883,2 45,82
3896 46,11
3902,8 45,84
3910 46,25
3922,7 46,47
3939 46,37
4074,2 46,09
4156,5 46,51
4206,8 46,78
4244,9 46,99
4281,3 46,97
4294 47,41
4312,6 47,65
4325,4 47,94
4332,2 47,66
4339,4 48,08
4352,1 48,3
4368,4 48,2
4503,6 47,92
-----------------------
(4585,9 48,34
4636,2 48,61
4674,3 48,82
4710,7 48,8
4761,6 49,49)
TABLE 2
-T/10^4 Days/Year
centuries
---------------------------
0 364,76
52,2 370,95
52,2 374,76
226,2 370,95
276,9 381,46
276,9 391,22
335,6 393,66
340,2 397,56
340,2 400,16
367,8 400,65
367,8 404,52
367,8 412,26
394,5 400,65
408,2 418,06
429,4 404,09
435,8 413,23
445 424
481,6 410,28
481,6 414,09
558,1 431,76
655,6 410,28
706,3 420,79
706,3 430,55
765 432,99
769,6 436,89
769,6 439,49
797,2 439,98
797,2 443,85
797,2 451,59
823,9 439,98
837,6 457,39
858,8 443,42
865,2 452,56
874,4 463,33
911 449,61
911 453,42
987,5 471,09
1085 449,61
1135,7 460,12
1135,7 469,88
1194,4 472,32
1199 476,22
1199 478,82
1226,6 479,31
1226,6 483,18
1226,6 490,92
1253,3 479,31
1267 496,72
1288,2 482,75
1294,6 491,89
1303,8 502,66
1340,4 488,94
1340,4 492,75
1416,9 510,42
1514,4 488,94
1565,1 499,45
1565,1 509,21
1623,8 511,65
1628,4 515,55
1628,4 518,15
1656 518,64
1656 522,51
1656 530,25
1682,7 518,64
1696,4 536,05
1717,6 522,08
1724 531,22
1733,2 541,99
1769,8 528,27
1769,8 532,08
1846,3 549,75
1943,8 528,27
1994,5 538,78
1994,5 548,54
-------------------------
2053,2 550,98
2057,8 554,88
2057,8 557,48
2085,4 557,97
2085,4 561,84
2085,4 569,58
2112,1 557,97
2125,8 575,38
2147 561,41
2153,4 570,55
2162,6 581,32
2199,2 567,6
2199,2 571,41
2275,7 589,08
2373,2 567,6
2423,9 578,11
2423,9 587,87
2482,6 590,31
2487,2 594,21
2487,2 596,81
2514,8 597,3
2514,8 601,17
2514,8 608,91
2541,5 597,3
2555,2 614,71
2576,4 600,75
2582,8 609,88
2592 620,65
2628,6 606,94
2628,6 610,75
2705,1 628,41
2802,6 606,94
2853,3 617,45
2853,3 627,21
2912 629,65
2916,6 633,55
2916,6 636,15
2944,2 636,64
2944,2 640,51
2944,2 648,25
2970,9 636,64
2984,6 654,05
3005,8 640,08
3012,2 649,22
3021,4 659,99
3058 646,27
3058 650,08
3134,5 667,75
3232 646,27
3282,7 656,78
3282,7 666,54
3341,4 668,98
3346 672,88
3346 675,48
3373,6 675,97
3373,6 679,84
3373,6 687,58
3400,3 675,97
3414 693,38
3435,2 679,41
3441,6 688,55
3450,8 699,32
3487,4 685,6
3487,4 689,41
3563,9 707,08
3661,4 685,6
3712,1 696,11
3712,1 705,87
3770,8 708,31
3775,4 712,21
3775,4 714,81
3803 715,3
3803 719,17
3803 726,91
-------------------------
3829,7 715,3
3843,4 732,71
3864,6 718,74
3871 727,88
3880,2 738,65
3916,8 724,93
3916,8 728,74
3993,3 746,41
4090,8 724,93
4141,5 735,44
4141,5 745,2
4200,2 747,64
4204,8 751,54
4204,8 754,14
4232,4 754,63
4232,4 758,5
4232,4 766,24
4259,1 754,63
4272,8 772,04
4294 758,07
4300,4 767,21
4309,6 777,98
4346,2 764,26
4346,2 768,07
4422,7 785,74
4520,2 764,26
-------------------------
(4570,9 774,77
4570,9 784,53
4629,6 786,97
4634,2 790,87
4634,2 793,47
4661,8 793,96
4661,8 797,83
4661,8 805,57
4688,5 793,96
4702,2 811,37
4723,4 797,4
4729,8 806,54
4739 817,31
4775,6 803,59
4775,6 807,4
4852,1 825,07)
TABLE 3
-T/10^4 Months/Year
centuries
------------------------------
0 12,34
70 12,49
70 12,6
160,7 11,56
220 12,55
290 12,71
340 13,11
360 12,93
360 13,35
429,4 12,95
499,4 13,1
499,4 13,21
510 13
590,1 12,17
649,4 13,16
719,4 13,32
769,4 13,72
789,4 13,54
789,4 13,96
858,8 13,56
928,8 13,71
928,8 13,82
939,4 13,61
1019,5 12,78
1078,8 13,77
1148,8 13,93
1198,8 14,33
1218,8 14,15
1218,8 14,57
1288,2 14,17
1358,2 14,32
1358,2 14,43
1368,8 14,22
1448,9 13,39
1508,2 14,38
1578,2 14,54
1628,2 14,94
1648,2 14,76
1648,2 15,18
1717,6 14,78
1787,6 14,93
1787,6 15,04
1798,2 14,83
1878,3 14
1937,6 14,99
2007,6 15,15
------------------------
2057,6 15,55
2077,6 15,37
2077,6 15,79
2147 15,39
2217 15,54
2217 15,65
2227,6 15,44
2307,7 14,61
2367 15,6
2437 15,76
2487 16,16
2507 15,98
2507 16,4
2576,4 16
2646,4 16,15
2646,4 16,26
2657 16,05
2737,1 15,22
2796,4 16,21
2866,4 16,37
2916,4 16,77
2936,4 16,59
2936,4 17,01
3005,8 16,61
3075,8 16,76
3075,8 16,87
3086,4 16,66
3166,5 15,83
3225,8 16,82
3295,8 16,98
3345,8 17,38
3365,8 17,2
3365,8 17,62
3435,2 17,22
3505,2 17,37
3505,2 17,48
3515,8 17,27
3595,9 16,44
3655,2 17,43
3725,2 17,59
3775,2 17,99
3795,2 17,81
3795,2 18,23
------------------------
3864,6 17,83
3934,6 17,98
3934,6 18,09
3945,2 17,88
4025,3 17,05
4084,6 18,04
4154,6 18,2
4204,6 18,6
4224,6 18,42
4224,6 18,84
4294 18,44
4364 18,59
4364 18,7
4374,6 18,49
4454,7 17,66
4514 18,65
-----------------------
(4584 18,81
4634 19,21
4654 19,03
4654 19,45
4723,4 19,05
4793,4 19,2
4793,4 19,31
4804 19,1
4884,1 18,27
4943,4 19,26)
References:
Pannella Giorgio, 1972.
Paleontological Evidence on the Earth’s Rotational History Since Early Precambrian.
Astrophysics and Space Science, 16, (1972), 212-237.
(Figure 3 on page 235 and Figure 4 on page 236. Mean solar day,
Synodic Month, Tropical Year.
Exact age of sedimentation of the Gunflint Formation is 1878.3+-1.3
Ma, YPM-IP-28510/28511.)
Scrutton, C.T., (1964), 1965.
Periodicity in Devonian Coral Growth.
Paleontology, volume 7, part 4, pages 552-558, plates 86-87.
(Middle Devonian OUM DT2 fossil, age is 385.3 Ma – 397.5 Ma, GT2004, approximate linear formula 12.37 – 1.43*10^(-7)*T, months/year, T=centuries,
past time minus signed).
Scrutton, C.T., 1970.
Evidence for a monthly periodicity in the growth of some corals.
In:
Runcorn, S.K. (editor), 1970.
Paleogeophysics. Academic Press, London, pages 11-16.
Fralick, P., Davis, D.W., Kissin, S.A., 2002.
The age of the Gunflint Formation, Ontario, Canada: single zircon U-Pb
age determinations
from reworked volcanic ash.
Can. J. Earth Sci., 39, 1085-1091.
From: mathematician <hapo...@luukku.com>
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <533c8763-511e-4ec6...@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 09:46:50 +0000 (UTC)
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's fossil time data
1 kirjoittajan 2 viestiä
mathematician
14.1.2009
Muut vastaanottajat: george....@adelaide.edu.au
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's
fossil time data ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Author: H.K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki, Finland.
Date: 13.1.2009)
Below are few rough estimations of ancient time data. It should be remembered that
these linear extrapolations are based on my uncertain assumption of existence of
oscillation of period 429.4 Ma in Pannella's figure 3 (reference 2)
and ages
and data of fossils and stromatolites are in many cases uncertain
too.
The Elatina Formation and Reynella Siltstone -----------------------------------------------------------------
620 Ma:
-----------
655.6 Ma, 410.28 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give roughly approx. 412 days/year)
639 Ma, 31.49 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give roughly approx. 31.7 days/month) 410.28/31.49 = 13.03 months/year, (primary value = 13.1 +-0.1 months/ year)
649.4 Ma, 13.16 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(primary value = 13.1 +-0.1 months/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 412/31.7 = 13.0 months/year)
(13.0-13.2 months/year)
The Big Cottonwood Formation
--------------------------------------------
900 Ma:
-----------
890.2 Ma, 33.34 days/month
897 Ma, 33.06 days/month
904.2 Ma, 33.48 days/month
(33-33.5 days/month, average = 33.29 days/month)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 33.4 days/month)
874.4 Ma, 463.33 days/year
911 Ma, 449.61 days/year
911 Ma, 453.42 days/year
(450-463 days/year, average = 455.45 days/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 451 days/year) 455.45/33.29 = 13.68 months/year, (primary value 13.5 months/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 451/33.4 = 13.5 months/year)
928.8 Ma, 13.71 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
928.8 Ma, 13.82 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(13.7-13.8 months/year, primary value 13.5 months/year)
(13.5-13.8 months/year)
The Weeli Wolli Formation
--------------------------------------
2450 Ma:
-------------
2438.9 Ma, 39.21 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 39.2 days/month)
2423.9 Ma, 587.87 days/year
2423.9 Ma, 578.11 days/year
(578-588 days/year, average = 582.99 days/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 585 days/year) 582.99/39.21 = 14.87 months/year, (primary value = 14.5 +-0.5 months/ year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 585/39.2 = 14.9 months/year)
2437 Ma, 15.76 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(primary value = 14.5 +-0.5 months/year)
(14.9-15.8 months/year)
Reference (1).
The Gunflint Formation
------------------
1878.3 +-1.3 Ma:
------------------------
1927.2 Ma, 36.97 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 37.2 days/month)
1846.3 Ma, 549.75 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figure gives roughly approx. 533 days/year) 549.75/36.97 = 14.87 months/year (primary value = 14 months/year)
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 533/37.2 = 14.3 months/year)
1937.6 Ma, 14.99 monnths/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(14.3-15.0 months/year)
Age of the Bulawayan stromatolite UCLA-Bul-7 ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mode = 10-20-40, Highest Count = 41.
2576.6.4 Ma, 40.11 days/month
2595 Ma, 40.35 days/month
2607.8 Ma, 40.64 days/month
2614.6 Ma, 40.34 days/month
2621.8 Ma, 40.78 days/month
2634.5 Ma, 41 days/month
2650.8 Ma, 40.9 days/month
2786 Ma, 40.62 days/month
2868.3 Ma, 41.04 days/month
So age of the Bulawayan Stromatolite UCLA-Bul-7 could be:
2580 Ma - 2870 Ma.
(primary value of the age =
(2672 +- 12 Ma - 2715 +- 15 Ma), Upper Bulawayan Group or
(2831 +- 6 Ma - 2904 +- 9 Ma), Lower Bulawayan Group. These both
are not local age determinations from the Bubi Greenstone Belt near Huntsman Quarries, Zimbabwe.)
Other Time Data for UCLA-Bul-7 stromatolite: -----------------------------------------------------------------
(40-41 days/month, primary value)
(average = 40.5 days/month, primary value)
2576.4 Ma, 600.75 days/year
2582.8 Ma, 609.88 days/year
2592 Ma, 620.65 days/year
2628.6 Ma, 606.94 days/year
2628.6 Ma, 610.75 days/year
2705.1 Ma, 628.41 days/year
2802.6 Ma, 606.94 days/year
2853.3 Ma, 617.45 days/year
2853.3 Ma, 627.21 days/year
2912 Ma, 629.65 days/year
2916.6 Ma, 633.55 days/year
2916.6 Ma, 636.15 days/year
(average = 7428.33/12 = 619.03 = approx. 619 days/year)
(601-636 days/year)
619/40.5 = 15.3 months/year
OUM-DT2 based estimation:
2576.4 Ma, 16 months/year
2646.4 Ma, 16.15 months/year
2646.4 Ma, 16.26 months/year
2657 Ma, 16.05 months/year
2737.1 Ma, 15.22 months/year
2796.4 Ma, 16.21 months/year
2866.4 Ma, 16.37 months/year
2916.4 Ma, 16.77 months/year
(average = 129.03/8 = 16.13 = approx. 16.1 months/year)
(15.2 - 16.8 months/year)
References (2 and 3).
The Moodies Group
----------------------------
3225 Ma:
-------------
3215.4 Ma, 42.44 days/month
(Drawn extrapolated figure roughly gives approx. 42.8 days/month)
3232 Ma, 646.27 days/year
(Drawn extrapolated figure roughly gives approx. 650 days/year) 646.27/42.44 = 15.23 months/year
(Drawn extrapolated figures give 650/42.8 = 15.2 months/year)
3225.8 Ma, 16.82 months/year (OUM-DT2 based)
(15.2-16.8 months/year)
Reference (4).
REFERENCES:
1. Williams, G.E. 2000.
Reviews of Geophysics, 38, 1/February 2000, pages 37-59.
2. Pannella, G., 1972.
Astrophysics and Space Science, 16, (1972), 212-237.
3. Fralick,P., Davis,D.W., Kissin,S.A., 2002.
Can. J. Earth Sci., 39, 1085-1091.
4. Eriksson,K.A., Simpson,E.L., Mueller,W., 2006.
Sedimentary Geology 190 (2006), 13-24.
5. Poropudas Hannu, 2009. Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella's Fossil Time Data for Test
Purposes.
<533c8763-511e-4ec6...@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
sci.bio.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,
sci.math.
Sat, 13 Dec 2008, 10 pages.
(I have drawn four extrapolated figures (0-1200 Ma, days/year, 0-4600
Ma, days/year,
0-1200 Ma days/month, 0-4600 Ma, days/month) but unfortunately they
are not possible
to give here due this text is in ASCII-format. I could send them via
email by request.
My email address:
hanporop
(at)
luukku.com )
From: mathematician <hapo...@luukku.com>
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's
fossil time data
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <c91312bb-c2b7-4672...@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:52:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: george....@adelaide.edu.au
Re: Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated
Pannella's fossil time data
Hannu Poropudas
21.1.2009
Käännä viesti kielelle: suomi
Earth's Rotational History from Linear
Extarpolation of Pannella's Ancient Time
Data of Fossils
----------------------------------------
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes.
<533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,
sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
On Jan 14, 7:52 am, mathematician <hapor...@luukku.com> wrote:
Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's fossil time data ---------------------------------------------------------------------------¬---------------------------------------------- näytä lainattu teksti -
<533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1...@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
sci.bio.paleontology, sci.astro, sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,
sci.math.
Sat, 13 Dec 2008, 10 pages.
(I have drawn four extrapolated figures (0-1200 Ma, days/year, 0-4600 Ma, days/year,
0-1200 Ma days/month, 0-4600 Ma, days/month) but unfortunately they
are not possible
to give here due this text is in ASCII-format. I could send them via email by request.
My email address:
hanporop
(at)
luukku.com )
From: mathematician <hapo...@luukku.com>REMARK: Important TABLE4 (hours/day) is copied here.
Newsgroups: sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Re: Testing some ancient time data points with extrapolated Pannella's fossil time data
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:19:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <23d6c001-7a3b-4565...@r10g2000prf.googlegroups.com> References: <c91312bb-c2b7-4672...@f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:19:37 +0000 (UTC)
It is assumed that the tropical year has not changed significantly in these calculations
(linear extrapolation of Pannella G 's fossil time data).
I put copy of TABLE1, TABLE2, TABLE3 and TABLE4 here due these TABLES are used in
calculation of UCLA-BUL-7 stromatolite astronomical time data.
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki / Oulu,
Finland
keskiviikko 21. joulukuuta 2022 klo 10.38.31 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:Finland.
maanantai 19. joulukuuta 2022 klo 12.43.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 26. heinäkuuta 2021 klo 15.42.53 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 10:55:43 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas,
TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.Simple approximate calculation of the length of the cosmic year
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes. <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
R0 = 7.92 +- 0.16 kpc ,(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model).
v0 = 227 km*s^(-1), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
1 pc = 3.26 ly,
1 ly = 9.460528436*10^15 m,
R0 = 7.92 kpc = 7.92*3.26*10^3*9.460528436*10^15 m = 2.442632758*10^20 m,
2*Pi*R0 = 1.534751426*10^21 m,
v0 = 227*10^3*m*s^(-1),
T0 = 2*Pi*R0/v0, (simple circular motion approximation for the length of cosmic year).
T0 = 1.534751426*10^21 / 227*10^3 s = 6.761019496*10^15 s =
= 6.761019496*10^15 / (365.2422*24*60*60) yrs = 214248354.8 yrs =
= approx. 214.25 Myrs.
(simplified error estimates , if R0 = 8.08 kpc, T0 = 218576604.4 yrs = approx. 219 Myrs and
if R0 = 7.76 kpc, T0 = 209920105.2 yrs = approx. 210 Myrs)
Reference:
VERA collaboration, Tomoya Hirota et al., 2020.
The First VERA Astronomy Catalog.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2020) 72 (4), 50 (1-19).
(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasONE SPECULATION OF MINE:
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Oulu / Kiiminki
Finland.
One very brave strange speculation of mine about time-dimension of the whole space:
If I speculate that whole space would be a kind of "mega-galaxy",
then I would speculate that this "mega-galaxy" has a center (inside black hole,
"H-M's big ball" and "H-M's color-forces center planet" instead of singularity).
This would be the origin of time dimension of the whole space.
Time-dimension would be formed from a "frozen time-wave",
which consists two kind of direction of flow of time,
one direction forwards time and other backwards of time.
(this speculation of mine is similar than H-M's color drawing of a black hole,
which is public visible in my Hannu Poropudas Facebook Page.)
Period of this "frozen time-wave" would have the period of above "Megacycles" articles of mine mentioned period of megacycles about
429.4 million years, which is my brave strange speculation in this case.
Ofcourse existence of megacycle about 429.4 million years
must be observed also in geology of other planets and also properties (redshifts?)
in whole space before this period 429.4 million years of speculation could be true?
Best Regards,WRONG TERM CORRECTION:
Hannu Poropudas, Kolamäentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki / Oulu, Finland.
"mega-galaxy" -> "metagalaxy"
HannuMORE SPECULATIONS OF MINE
(everything should be tested to see if these are true):
I have thought this "metagalaxy" and "time-wave" more closely:
I think that only observable physical phenomena for " time-wave"
could be such that this "time-wave" goes though all matter in "metagalaxy" periodically of cycles of 429.4 million years (this period is my guess) and "forwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave" would not have any significant
effect to physical matter but "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
could have some kind of warming effect interiors of planets,
like Earth, Venus, Mars for example,
which could increase VOLCANISM in those planets ?
In H-M's black hole (also galaxy as I have undestood) drawing
"time-wave" have (freezed?) cycles of oscillation of 100000-300000 years.
I do not know that would this second limit 300000 years period
be related to second kind on "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamod" shaped
"creation stone of the Universe" due she has drawn
two different kind of "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamond"
shaped "creation stone of the Universe" on one of her drawing
(both drawings are also public in Hannu Poropudas Facebook ).
As I look large-scale structure maps of the Universe, I have poorly understood
that "large void" areas could be those "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
and "supercluster" areas could be those "forwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"?
As I look Planck-Satellite 2013 results of cosmic backround radiation temperature
distribution maps, I see those "cold spots" and "warm spots" which I know both to be "light cones". And "warm spots" of these two are closer to the Big Bang start.
I have also poorly understood that these spots corresponds to present
size of "superclusters" and maybe (?) also present size of "large voids"?
OPEN QUESTION: Is our Universe much larger that we have ever expected due these
"hidden" cycle periods of 429.4 million years (my own guess) of time flow, if so, this would then look like structure of "pearls on ribbon"
each "pearl on ribbon" would correspond to a "metagalaxy" and
time-flow slice of 429.4 million years (my own guess)?
What we know (not much) presently about geology (VOLGANISM)
of Venus and Mars:
1. NASA's Magellan spacegraft mission discovered that
Venus has a geologically young surface with a relatively uniform age of 500+-200 Ma (million years).
Reference:
Geodynamics of Venus (Wikipedia 21.12.2022).
2. The Ages of Mars (Ga=billion years):
Pre-Noachian 4.5-4.1 Ga,
Noachian 4.1-3.7 Ga,
Hesperian 3.7-2.9 Ga,
Amazonian 2.9 Ga - present.
Reference:
https://sci.eas.int/web/mars-express/~/55481-the-ages_of_mars
Last Update 1 September 2019.
(21.12.2022)
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
torstai 22. joulukuuta 2022 klo 9.57.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:Finland.
keskiviikko 21. joulukuuta 2022 klo 10.38.31 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 19. joulukuuta 2022 klo 12.43.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 26. heinäkuuta 2021 klo 15.42.53 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 10:55:43 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas,
TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.Simple approximate calculation of the length of the cosmic year
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes. <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
R0 = 7.92 +- 0.16 kpc ,(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model).
v0 = 227 km*s^(-1), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
1 pc = 3.26 ly,
1 ly = 9.460528436*10^15 m,
R0 = 7.92 kpc = 7.92*3.26*10^3*9.460528436*10^15 m = 2.442632758*10^20 m,
2*Pi*R0 = 1.534751426*10^21 m,
v0 = 227*10^3*m*s^(-1),
T0 = 2*Pi*R0/v0, (simple circular motion approximation for the length of cosmic year).
T0 = 1.534751426*10^21 / 227*10^3 s = 6.761019496*10^15 s =
= 6.761019496*10^15 / (365.2422*24*60*60) yrs = 214248354.8 yrs =
= approx. 214.25 Myrs.
(simplified error estimates , if R0 = 8.08 kpc, T0 = 218576604.4 yrs = approx. 219 Myrs and
if R0 = 7.76 kpc, T0 = 209920105.2 yrs = approx. 210 Myrs)
Reference:
VERA collaboration, Tomoya Hirota et al., 2020.
The First VERA Astronomy Catalog.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2020) 72 (4), 50 (1-19).
(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasONE SPECULATION OF MINE:
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Oulu / Kiiminki
Finland.
One very brave strange speculation of mine about time-dimension of the whole space:
If I speculate that whole space would be a kind of "mega-galaxy",
then I would speculate that this "mega-galaxy" has a center (inside black hole,
"H-M's big ball" and "H-M's color-forces center planet" instead of singularity).
This would be the origin of time dimension of the whole space.
Time-dimension would be formed from a "frozen time-wave",
which consists two kind of direction of flow of time,
one direction forwards time and other backwards of time.
(this speculation of mine is similar than H-M's color drawing of a black hole,
which is public visible in my Hannu Poropudas Facebook Page.)
Period of this "frozen time-wave" would have the period of above "Megacycles" articles of mine mentioned period of megacycles about 429.4 million years, which is my brave strange speculation in this case.
Ofcourse existence of megacycle about 429.4 million years
must be observed also in geology of other planets and also properties (redshifts?)
in whole space before this period 429.4 million years of speculation could be true?
Best Regards,WRONG TERM CORRECTION:
Hannu Poropudas, Kolamäentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki / Oulu, Finland.
"mega-galaxy" -> "metagalaxy"
HannuMORE SPECULATIONS OF MINE
(everything should be tested to see if these are true):
I have thought this "metagalaxy" and "time-wave" more closely:
I think that only observable physical phenomena for " time-wave"
could be such that this "time-wave" goes though all matter in "metagalaxy" periodically of cycles of 429.4 million years (this period is my guess) and
"forwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave" would not have any significant
effect to physical matter but "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
could have some kind of warming effect interiors of planets,
like Earth, Venus, Mars for example,
which could increase VOLCANISM in those planets ?
In H-M's black hole (also galaxy as I have undestood) drawing
"time-wave" have (freezed?) cycles of oscillation of 100000-300000 years. I do not know that would this second limit 300000 years period
be related to second kind on "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamod" shaped "creation stone of the Universe" due she has drawn
two different kind of "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamond"
shaped "creation stone of the Universe" on one of her drawing
(both drawings are also public in Hannu Poropudas Facebook ).
Above mentioned 100000 years periodicity of volcanism would fit nicely to the
"Figure 2. Climate and sea level of the last 450 kyrs" ?
I would prefer volcanism explanation instead explanation of the Milankovitch Theory
of Earth's eccentricity periodicity about 100000 years.
This is due that Earth's orbit eccentricity changes would be too SMALL to cause
these high sea level rises points in this Figure 2 ?
Reference:
Carlson Anders, 2011.
Ice Sheets and Sea Level in Earth's Past.
Nature Education Knowledge 3 (10):3, 8 pages. Figure 2 Sea Level (m).
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
As I look large-scale structure maps of the Universe, I have poorly understood
that "large void" areas could be those "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
and "supercluster" areas could be those "forwards direction of time flow" of
"time-wave"?
As I look Planck-Satellite 2013 results of cosmic backround radiation temperature
distribution maps, I see those "cold spots" and "warm spots" which I know both to be "light cones". And "warm spots" of these two are closer to the Big Bang start.
I have also poorly understood that these spots corresponds to present
size of "superclusters" and maybe (?) also present size of "large voids"?
OPEN QUESTION: Is our Universe much larger that we have ever expected due these
"hidden" cycle periods of 429.4 million years (my own guess) of time flow, if so, this would then look like structure of "pearls on ribbon"
each "pearl on ribbon" would correspond to a "metagalaxy" and
time-flow slice of 429.4 million years (my own guess)?
What we know (not much) presently about geology (VOLGANISM)
of Venus and Mars:
1. NASA's Magellan spacegraft mission discovered that
Venus has a geologically young surface with a relatively uniform age of 500+-200 Ma (million years).
Reference:
Geodynamics of Venus (Wikipedia 21.12.2022).
2. The Ages of Mars (Ga=billion years):
Pre-Noachian 4.5-4.1 Ga,
Noachian 4.1-3.7 Ga,
Hesperian 3.7-2.9 Ga,
Amazonian 2.9 Ga - present.
Reference:
https://sci.eas.int/web/mars-express/~/55481-the-ages_of_mars
Last Update 1 September 2019.
(21.12.2022)
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
torstai 1. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 10.39.40 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:Poropudas, Finland.
torstai 22. joulukuuta 2022 klo 9.57.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
keskiviikko 21. joulukuuta 2022 klo 10.38.31 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 19. joulukuuta 2022 klo 12.43.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 26. heinäkuuta 2021 klo 15.42.53 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 10:55:43 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards, Hannu
TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.Simple approximate calculation of the length of the cosmic year
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes. <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
R0 = 7.92 +- 0.16 kpc ,(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model).
v0 = 227 km*s^(-1), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
1 pc = 3.26 ly,
1 ly = 9.460528436*10^15 m,
R0 = 7.92 kpc = 7.92*3.26*10^3*9.460528436*10^15 m = 2.442632758*10^20 m,
2*Pi*R0 = 1.534751426*10^21 m,
v0 = 227*10^3*m*s^(-1),
T0 = 2*Pi*R0/v0, (simple circular motion approximation for the length of cosmic year).
T0 = 1.534751426*10^21 / 227*10^3 s = 6.761019496*10^15 s =
= 6.761019496*10^15 / (365.2422*24*60*60) yrs = 214248354.8 yrs = = approx. 214.25 Myrs.
(simplified error estimates , if R0 = 8.08 kpc, T0 = 218576604.4 yrs = approx. 219 Myrs and
if R0 = 7.76 kpc, T0 = 209920105.2 yrs = approx. 210 Myrs)
Reference:
VERA collaboration, Tomoya Hirota et al., 2020.
The First VERA Astronomy Catalog.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2020) 72 (4), 50 (1-19).
(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasONE SPECULATION OF MINE:
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Oulu / Kiiminki
Finland.
One very brave strange speculation of mine about time-dimension of the whole space:
If I speculate that whole space would be a kind of "mega-galaxy", then I would speculate that this "mega-galaxy" has a center (inside black hole,
"H-M's big ball" and "H-M's color-forces center planet" instead of singularity).
This would be the origin of time dimension of the whole space.
Time-dimension would be formed from a "frozen time-wave",
which consists two kind of direction of flow of time,
one direction forwards time and other backwards of time.
(this speculation of mine is similar than H-M's color drawing of a black hole,
which is public visible in my Hannu Poropudas Facebook Page.)
Period of this "frozen time-wave" would have the period of above "Megacycles" articles of mine mentioned period of megacycles about 429.4 million years, which is my brave strange speculation in this case.
Ofcourse existence of megacycle about 429.4 million years
must be observed also in geology of other planets and also properties (redshifts?)
in whole space before this period 429.4 million years of speculation could be true?
Best Regards,WRONG TERM CORRECTION:
Hannu Poropudas, Kolamäentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki / Oulu, Finland.
"mega-galaxy" -> "metagalaxy"
HannuMORE SPECULATIONS OF MINE
(everything should be tested to see if these are true):
I have thought this "metagalaxy" and "time-wave" more closely:
I think that only observable physical phenomena for " time-wave"
could be such that this "time-wave" goes though all matter in "metagalaxy"
periodically of cycles of 429.4 million years (this period is my guess) and
"forwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave" would not have any significant
effect to physical matter but "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
could have some kind of warming effect interiors of planets,
like Earth, Venus, Mars for example,
which could increase VOLCANISM in those planets ?
In H-M's black hole (also galaxy as I have undestood) drawing "time-wave" have (freezed?) cycles of oscillation of 100000-300000 years.
I do not know that would this second limit 300000 years period
be related to second kind on "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamod" shaped "creation stone of the Universe" due she has drawn
two different kind of "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamond"
shaped "creation stone of the Universe" on one of her drawing
(both drawings are also public in Hannu Poropudas Facebook ).
Above mentioned 100000 years periodicity of volcanism would fit nicely to the
"Figure 2. Climate and sea level of the last 450 kyrs" ?
I would prefer volcanism explanation instead explanation of the Milankovitch Theory
of Earth's eccentricity periodicity about 100000 years.
This is due that Earth's orbit eccentricity changes would be too SMALL to cause
these high sea level rises points in this Figure 2 ?
Reference:
Carlson Anders, 2011.
Ice Sheets and Sea Level in Earth's Past.
Nature Education Knowledge 3 (10):3, 8 pages. Figure 2 Sea Level (m).
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
As I look large-scale structure maps of the Universe, I have poorly understood
that "large void" areas could be those "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
and "supercluster" areas could be those "forwards direction of time flow" of
"time-wave"?
As I look Planck-Satellite 2013 results of cosmic backround radiation temperature
distribution maps, I see those "cold spots" and "warm spots" which I know
both to be "light cones". And "warm spots" of these two are closer to the Big Bang start.
I have also poorly understood that these spots corresponds to present size of "superclusters" and maybe (?) also present size of "large voids"?
OPEN QUESTION: Is our Universe much larger that we have ever expected due these
"hidden" cycle periods of 429.4 million years (my own guess) of time flow,
if so, this would then look like structure of "pearls on ribbon"
each "pearl on ribbon" would correspond to a "metagalaxy" and
time-flow slice of 429.4 million years (my own guess)?
What we know (not much) presently about geology (VOLGANISM)
of Venus and Mars:
1. NASA's Magellan spacegraft mission discovered that
Venus has a geologically young surface with a relatively uniform age of 500+-200 Ma (million years).
Reference:
Geodynamics of Venus (Wikipedia 21.12.2022).
2. The Ages of Mars (Ga=billion years):
Pre-Noachian 4.5-4.1 Ga,
Noachian 4.1-3.7 Ga,
Hesperian 3.7-2.9 Ga,
Amazonian 2.9 Ga - present.
Reference:
https://sci.eas.int/web/mars-express/~/55481-the-ages_of_mars
Last Update 1 September 2019.
(21.12.2022)
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
I found one interesting experimental reference
of time-series plots from age histograms in recent
Kenneth Condie paper, from (5d.) which I found roughly
following approximate maximums:
3820 Ma
3520 Ma
3450 Ma
3150 Ma
2980 Ma
2920 Ma
2880 Ma
2780 Ma
2700 Ma
2620 Ma
2580 Ma
2500 Ma
2450 Ma
2380 Ma
2220 Ma
2180 Ma
2120 Ma
2050 Ma
1980 Ma
1890 Ma
1800 Ma
1780 Ma
1700 Ma
1650 Ma
1590 Ma
1450 Ma
1390 Ma
1250 Ma
1190 Ma
1100 Ma
1000 Ma
920 Ma
790 Ma
720 Ma
600 Ma
520 Ma
450 Ma
390 Ma
300 Ma
250 Ma
200 Ma
100 Ma
REFERENCE:
Condie, K. C., 2021.
Revisiting the Mesoproterozoic.
Gondwanda Research, 100 (2021) 44-52.
(Figure 5d, page 48).
-------------------------------
(Figure 5. Raw time-series plots from age histograms
at 10 Myr intervals, regional weighting of ages, U/Pb records
accepted with absolute discordance < 70 Myr and
2-sigma uncertainty < 75 Myr; 25 Myr resolution.
5d. large igneous province (LIP) ages represented
----
in 535 crustal provinces (no regional weighting,
smoothed with 3-weight Gaussian kernel).)
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
keskiviikko 14. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.25.40 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:Poropudas, Finland.
torstai 1. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 10.39.40 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
torstai 22. joulukuuta 2022 klo 9.57.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
keskiviikko 21. joulukuuta 2022 klo 10.38.31 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 19. joulukuuta 2022 klo 12.43.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 26. heinäkuuta 2021 klo 15.42.53 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 10:55:43 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards, Hannu
TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.Simple approximate calculation of the length of the cosmic year
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes. <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
R0 = 7.92 +- 0.16 kpc ,(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model).
v0 = 227 km*s^(-1), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
1 pc = 3.26 ly,
1 ly = 9.460528436*10^15 m,
R0 = 7.92 kpc = 7.92*3.26*10^3*9.460528436*10^15 m = 2.442632758*10^20 m,
2*Pi*R0 = 1.534751426*10^21 m,
v0 = 227*10^3*m*s^(-1),
T0 = 2*Pi*R0/v0, (simple circular motion approximation for the length of cosmic year).
T0 = 1.534751426*10^21 / 227*10^3 s = 6.761019496*10^15 s =
= 6.761019496*10^15 / (365.2422*24*60*60) yrs = 214248354.8 yrs =
= approx. 214.25 Myrs.
(simplified error estimates , if R0 = 8.08 kpc, T0 = 218576604.4 yrs = approx. 219 Myrs and
if R0 = 7.76 kpc, T0 = 209920105.2 yrs = approx. 210 Myrs)
Reference:
VERA collaboration, Tomoya Hirota et al., 2020.
The First VERA Astronomy Catalog.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2020) 72 (4), 50 (1-19).
(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasONE SPECULATION OF MINE:
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Oulu / Kiiminki
Finland.
One very brave strange speculation of mine about time-dimension of the whole space:
If I speculate that whole space would be a kind of "mega-galaxy", then I would speculate that this "mega-galaxy" has a center (inside black hole,
"H-M's big ball" and "H-M's color-forces center planet" instead of singularity).
This would be the origin of time dimension of the whole space.
Time-dimension would be formed from a "frozen time-wave",
which consists two kind of direction of flow of time,
one direction forwards time and other backwards of time.
(this speculation of mine is similar than H-M's color drawing of a black hole,
which is public visible in my Hannu Poropudas Facebook Page.)
Period of this "frozen time-wave" would have the period of above "Megacycles" articles of mine mentioned period of megacycles about 429.4 million years, which is my brave strange speculation in this case.
Ofcourse existence of megacycle about 429.4 million years
must be observed also in geology of other planets and also properties (redshifts?)
in whole space before this period 429.4 million years of speculation could be true?
Best Regards,WRONG TERM CORRECTION:
Hannu Poropudas, Kolamäentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki / Oulu, Finland.
"mega-galaxy" -> "metagalaxy"
HannuMORE SPECULATIONS OF MINE
(everything should be tested to see if these are true):
I have thought this "metagalaxy" and "time-wave" more closely:
I think that only observable physical phenomena for " time-wave"
could be such that this "time-wave" goes though all matter in "metagalaxy"
periodically of cycles of 429.4 million years (this period is my guess) and
"forwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave" would not have any significant
effect to physical matter but "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
could have some kind of warming effect interiors of planets,
like Earth, Venus, Mars for example,
which could increase VOLCANISM in those planets ?
In H-M's black hole (also galaxy as I have undestood) drawing "time-wave" have (freezed?) cycles of oscillation of 100000-300000 years.
I do not know that would this second limit 300000 years period
be related to second kind on "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamod" shaped "creation stone of the Universe" due she has drawn
two different kind of "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamond"
shaped "creation stone of the Universe" on one of her drawing
(both drawings are also public in Hannu Poropudas Facebook ).
Above mentioned 100000 years periodicity of volcanism would fit nicely to the
"Figure 2. Climate and sea level of the last 450 kyrs" ?
I would prefer volcanism explanation instead explanation of the Milankovitch Theory
of Earth's eccentricity periodicity about 100000 years.
This is due that Earth's orbit eccentricity changes would be too SMALL to cause
these high sea level rises points in this Figure 2 ?
Reference:
Carlson Anders, 2011.
Ice Sheets and Sea Level in Earth's Past.
Nature Education Knowledge 3 (10):3, 8 pages. Figure 2 Sea Level (m).
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
As I look large-scale structure maps of the Universe, I have poorly understood
that "large void" areas could be those "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
and "supercluster" areas could be those "forwards direction of time flow" of
"time-wave"?
As I look Planck-Satellite 2013 results of cosmic backround radiation temperature
distribution maps, I see those "cold spots" and "warm spots" which I know
both to be "light cones". And "warm spots" of these two are closer to the Big Bang start.
I have also poorly understood that these spots corresponds to present size of "superclusters" and maybe (?) also present size of "large voids"?
OPEN QUESTION: Is our Universe much larger that we have ever expected due these
"hidden" cycle periods of 429.4 million years (my own guess) of time flow,
if so, this would then look like structure of "pearls on ribbon"
each "pearl on ribbon" would correspond to a "metagalaxy" and time-flow slice of 429.4 million years (my own guess)?
What we know (not much) presently about geology (VOLGANISM)
of Venus and Mars:
1. NASA's Magellan spacegraft mission discovered that
Venus has a geologically young surface with a relatively uniform age of
500+-200 Ma (million years).
Reference:
Geodynamics of Venus (Wikipedia 21.12.2022).
2. The Ages of Mars (Ga=billion years):
Pre-Noachian 4.5-4.1 Ga,
Noachian 4.1-3.7 Ga,
Hesperian 3.7-2.9 Ga,
Amazonian 2.9 Ga - present.
Reference: https://sci.eas.int/web/mars-express/~/55481-the-ages_of_mars
Last Update 1 September 2019.
(21.12.2022)
CORRECTION:Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
I noticed from Figure 5d that at least following rough approximations
of maximums are also present in Figure 5d:
3390 Ma
3250 Ma
3020 Ma
820 Ma.
I put these also in to the list:
I found one interesting experimental reference
of time-series plots from age histograms in recent
Kenneth Condie paper, from (5d.) which I found roughly
following approximate maximums:
3820 Ma3390 Ma
3520 Ma
3450 Ma
3250 Ma
3150 Ma
3020 Ma
2980 Ma820 Ma
2920 Ma
2880 Ma
2780 Ma
2700 Ma
2620 Ma
2580 Ma
2500 Ma
2450 Ma
2380 Ma
2220 Ma
2180 Ma
2120 Ma
2050 Ma
1980 Ma
1890 Ma
1800 Ma
1780 Ma
1700 Ma
1650 Ma
1590 Ma
1450 Ma
1390 Ma
1250 Ma
1190 Ma
1100 Ma
1000 Ma
920 Ma
790 Ma
720 Ma
600 Ma
520 Ma
450 Ma
390 Ma
300 Ma
250 Ma
200 Ma
100 Ma
REFERENCE:
Condie, K. C., 2021.
Revisiting the Mesoproterozoic.
Gondwanda Research, 100 (2021) 44-52.
(Figure 5d, page 48).
-------------------------------
(Figure 5. Raw time-series plots from age histograms
at 10 Myr intervals, regional weighting of ages, U/Pb records
accepted with absolute discordance < 70 Myr and
2-sigma uncertainty < 75 Myr; 25 Myr resolution.
5d. large igneous province (LIP) ages represented
----
in 535 crustal provinces (no regional weighting,
smoothed with 3-weight Gaussian kernel).)
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasI'am sorry about my mistake of missing maximums
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
torstai 15. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.45.00 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:Poropudas, Finland.
keskiviikko 14. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.25.40 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
torstai 1. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 10.39.40 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
torstai 22. joulukuuta 2022 klo 9.57.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
keskiviikko 21. joulukuuta 2022 klo 10.38.31 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 19. joulukuuta 2022 klo 12.43.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 26. heinäkuuta 2021 klo 15.42.53 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 10:55:43 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards, Hannu
TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.Simple approximate calculation of the length of the cosmic year
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes. <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
R0 = 7.92 +- 0.16 kpc ,(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model). v0 = 227 km*s^(-1), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
1 pc = 3.26 ly,
1 ly = 9.460528436*10^15 m,
R0 = 7.92 kpc = 7.92*3.26*10^3*9.460528436*10^15 m = 2.442632758*10^20 m,
2*Pi*R0 = 1.534751426*10^21 m,
v0 = 227*10^3*m*s^(-1),
T0 = 2*Pi*R0/v0, (simple circular motion approximation for the length of cosmic year).
T0 = 1.534751426*10^21 / 227*10^3 s = 6.761019496*10^15 s =
= 6.761019496*10^15 / (365.2422*24*60*60) yrs = 214248354.8 yrs =
= approx. 214.25 Myrs.
(simplified error estimates , if R0 = 8.08 kpc, T0 = 218576604.4 yrs = approx. 219 Myrs and
if R0 = 7.76 kpc, T0 = 209920105.2 yrs = approx. 210 Myrs)
Reference:
VERA collaboration, Tomoya Hirota et al., 2020.
The First VERA Astronomy Catalog.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2020) 72 (4), 50 (1-19).
(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasONE SPECULATION OF MINE:
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Oulu / Kiiminki
Finland.
One very brave strange speculation of mine about time-dimension of the whole space:
If I speculate that whole space would be a kind of "mega-galaxy",
then I would speculate that this "mega-galaxy" has a center (inside black hole,
"H-M's big ball" and "H-M's color-forces center planet" instead of singularity).
This would be the origin of time dimension of the whole space.
Time-dimension would be formed from a "frozen time-wave",
which consists two kind of direction of flow of time,
one direction forwards time and other backwards of time.
(this speculation of mine is similar than H-M's color drawing of a black hole,
which is public visible in my Hannu Poropudas Facebook Page.)
Period of this "frozen time-wave" would have the period of above "Megacycles" articles of mine mentioned period of megacycles about
429.4 million years, which is my brave strange speculation in this case.
Ofcourse existence of megacycle about 429.4 million years
must be observed also in geology of other planets and also properties (redshifts?)
in whole space before this period 429.4 million years of speculation could be true?
Best Regards,WRONG TERM CORRECTION:
Hannu Poropudas, Kolamäentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki / Oulu, Finland.
"mega-galaxy" -> "metagalaxy"
HannuMORE SPECULATIONS OF MINE
(everything should be tested to see if these are true):
I have thought this "metagalaxy" and "time-wave" more closely:
I think that only observable physical phenomena for " time-wave" could be such that this "time-wave" goes though all matter in "metagalaxy"
periodically of cycles of 429.4 million years (this period is my guess) and
"forwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave" would not have any significant
effect to physical matter but "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
could have some kind of warming effect interiors of planets,
like Earth, Venus, Mars for example,
which could increase VOLCANISM in those planets ?
In H-M's black hole (also galaxy as I have undestood) drawing "time-wave" have (freezed?) cycles of oscillation of 100000-300000 years.
I do not know that would this second limit 300000 years period
be related to second kind on "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamod" shaped "creation stone of the Universe" due she has drawn
two different kind of "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamond"
shaped "creation stone of the Universe" on one of her drawing
(both drawings are also public in Hannu Poropudas Facebook ).
Above mentioned 100000 years periodicity of volcanism would fit nicely to the
"Figure 2. Climate and sea level of the last 450 kyrs" ?
I would prefer volcanism explanation instead explanation of the Milankovitch Theory
of Earth's eccentricity periodicity about 100000 years.
This is due that Earth's orbit eccentricity changes would be too SMALL to cause
these high sea level rises points in this Figure 2 ?
Reference:
Carlson Anders, 2011.
Ice Sheets and Sea Level in Earth's Past.
Nature Education Knowledge 3 (10):3, 8 pages. Figure 2 Sea Level (m).
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
As I look large-scale structure maps of the Universe, I have poorly understood
that "large void" areas could be those "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
and "supercluster" areas could be those "forwards direction of time flow" of
"time-wave"?
As I look Planck-Satellite 2013 results of cosmic backround radiation temperature
distribution maps, I see those "cold spots" and "warm spots" which I know
both to be "light cones". And "warm spots" of these two are closer to the Big Bang start.
I have also poorly understood that these spots corresponds to present
size of "superclusters" and maybe (?) also present size of "large voids"?
OPEN QUESTION: Is our Universe much larger that we have ever expected due these
"hidden" cycle periods of 429.4 million years (my own guess) of time flow,
if so, this would then look like structure of "pearls on ribbon" each "pearl on ribbon" would correspond to a "metagalaxy" and time-flow slice of 429.4 million years (my own guess)?
What we know (not much) presently about geology (VOLGANISM)
of Venus and Mars:
1. NASA's Magellan spacegraft mission discovered that
Venus has a geologically young surface with a relatively uniform age of
500+-200 Ma (million years).
Reference:
Geodynamics of Venus (Wikipedia 21.12.2022).
2. The Ages of Mars (Ga=billion years):
Pre-Noachian 4.5-4.1 Ga,
Noachian 4.1-3.7 Ga,
Hesperian 3.7-2.9 Ga,
Amazonian 2.9 Ga - present.
Reference: https://sci.eas.int/web/mars-express/~/55481-the-ages_of_mars
Last Update 1 September 2019.
(21.12.2022)
CORRECTION:Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
I noticed from Figure 5d that at least following rough approximations
of maximums are also present in Figure 5d:
3390 Ma
3250 Ma
3020 Ma
820 Ma.
I put these also in to the list:
I found one interesting experimental reference
of time-series plots from age histograms in recent
Kenneth Condie paper, from (5d.) which I found roughly
following approximate maximums:
3820 Ma3390 Ma
3520 Ma
3450 Ma
3250 Ma
3150 Ma
3020 Ma
2980 Ma820 Ma
2920 Ma
2880 Ma
2780 Ma
2700 Ma
2620 Ma
2580 Ma
2500 Ma
2450 Ma
2380 Ma
2220 Ma
2180 Ma
2120 Ma
2050 Ma
1980 Ma
1890 Ma
1800 Ma
1780 Ma
1700 Ma
1650 Ma
1590 Ma
1450 Ma
1390 Ma
1250 Ma
1190 Ma
1100 Ma
1000 Ma
920 Ma
790 Ma
720 Ma
600 Ma
520 Ma
450 Ma
390 Ma
300 Ma
250 Ma
200 Ma
100 Ma
REFERENCE:
Condie, K. C., 2021.
Revisiting the Mesoproterozoic.
Gondwanda Research, 100 (2021) 44-52.
(Figure 5d, page 48).
-------------------------------
(Figure 5. Raw time-series plots from age histograms
at 10 Myr intervals, regional weighting of ages, U/Pb records
accepted with absolute discordance < 70 Myr and
2-sigma uncertainty < 75 Myr; 25 Myr resolution.
5d. large igneous province (LIP) ages represented
----
in 535 crustal provinces (no regional weighting,
smoothed with 3-weight Gaussian kernel).)
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasI'am sorry about my mistake of missing maximums
Best Regards, Hannu PoropudasI found one (more clear than above reference
of (Condie K C 2021) ?)
reference in which (Condie K C et al 2021) have found
approximately 400-Myr periodicity ?
REFERENCE:
Condie, K. C., Pisarevsky, S. A., Puetz, S. J., 2021.
LIPs, orogens and supercontinents: The ongoing saga.
Gondwana Research, 96 (2021) 105-121.
(Figure 5, page 110 and Figure 8, page 113, --------------------------------------------------------------------
five major age peaks are observed with --------------------------------------------------------------
approximately 400-Myr periodicity, page 118.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wonder that would meaning of last part of the title of the reference
"The ongoing saga"
be same as
"a long complicated series of related, usually negative, events" ?
Best Regards,
Hannu Poropudas
perjantai 16. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.29.17 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:Poropudas, Finland.
torstai 15. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.45.00 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
keskiviikko 14. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.25.40 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
torstai 1. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 10.39.40 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
torstai 22. joulukuuta 2022 klo 9.57.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
keskiviikko 21. joulukuuta 2022 klo 10.38.31 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 19. joulukuuta 2022 klo 12.43.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 26. heinäkuuta 2021 klo 15.42.53 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 10:55:43 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards, Hannu
TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.Simple approximate calculation of the length of the cosmic year
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes. <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
R0 = 7.92 +- 0.16 kpc ,(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model).
v0 = 227 km*s^(-1), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
1 pc = 3.26 ly,
1 ly = 9.460528436*10^15 m,
R0 = 7.92 kpc = 7.92*3.26*10^3*9.460528436*10^15 m = 2.442632758*10^20 m,
2*Pi*R0 = 1.534751426*10^21 m,
v0 = 227*10^3*m*s^(-1),
T0 = 2*Pi*R0/v0, (simple circular motion approximation for the length of cosmic year).
T0 = 1.534751426*10^21 / 227*10^3 s = 6.761019496*10^15 s = = 6.761019496*10^15 / (365.2422*24*60*60) yrs = 214248354.8 yrs =
= approx. 214.25 Myrs.
(simplified error estimates , if R0 = 8.08 kpc, T0 = 218576604.4 yrs = approx. 219 Myrs and
if R0 = 7.76 kpc, T0 = 209920105.2 yrs = approx. 210 Myrs)
Reference:
VERA collaboration, Tomoya Hirota et al., 2020.
The First VERA Astronomy Catalog.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2020) 72 (4), 50 (1-19).
(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasONE SPECULATION OF MINE:
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Oulu / Kiiminki
Finland.
One very brave strange speculation of mine about time-dimension of the whole space:
If I speculate that whole space would be a kind of "mega-galaxy",
then I would speculate that this "mega-galaxy" has a center (inside black hole,
"H-M's big ball" and "H-M's color-forces center planet" instead of singularity).
This would be the origin of time dimension of the whole space.
Time-dimension would be formed from a "frozen time-wave", which consists two kind of direction of flow of time,
one direction forwards time and other backwards of time.
(this speculation of mine is similar than H-M's color drawing of a black hole,
which is public visible in my Hannu Poropudas Facebook Page.)
Period of this "frozen time-wave" would have the period of above
"Megacycles" articles of mine mentioned period of megacycles about
429.4 million years, which is my brave strange speculation in this case.
Ofcourse existence of megacycle about 429.4 million years
must be observed also in geology of other planets and also properties (redshifts?)
in whole space before this period 429.4 million years of speculation could be true?
Best Regards,WRONG TERM CORRECTION:
Hannu Poropudas, Kolamäentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki / Oulu, Finland.
"mega-galaxy" -> "metagalaxy"
HannuMORE SPECULATIONS OF MINE
(everything should be tested to see if these are true):
I have thought this "metagalaxy" and "time-wave" more closely:
I think that only observable physical phenomena for " time-wave" could be such that this "time-wave" goes though all matter in "metagalaxy"
periodically of cycles of 429.4 million years (this period is my guess) and
"forwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave" would not have any significant
effect to physical matter but "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
could have some kind of warming effect interiors of planets,
like Earth, Venus, Mars for example,
which could increase VOLCANISM in those planets ?
In H-M's black hole (also galaxy as I have undestood) drawing "time-wave" have (freezed?) cycles of oscillation of 100000-300000 years.
I do not know that would this second limit 300000 years period
be related to second kind on "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamod" shaped "creation stone of the Universe" due she has drawn
two different kind of "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamond"
shaped "creation stone of the Universe" on one of her drawing (both drawings are also public in Hannu Poropudas Facebook ).
Above mentioned 100000 years periodicity of volcanism would fit nicely to the
"Figure 2. Climate and sea level of the last 450 kyrs" ?
I would prefer volcanism explanation instead explanation of the Milankovitch Theory
of Earth's eccentricity periodicity about 100000 years.
This is due that Earth's orbit eccentricity changes would be too SMALL to cause
these high sea level rises points in this Figure 2 ?
Reference:
Carlson Anders, 2011.
Ice Sheets and Sea Level in Earth's Past.
Nature Education Knowledge 3 (10):3, 8 pages. Figure 2 Sea Level (m).
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
As I look large-scale structure maps of the Universe, I have poorly understood
that "large void" areas could be those "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
and "supercluster" areas could be those "forwards direction of time flow" of
"time-wave"?
As I look Planck-Satellite 2013 results of cosmic backround radiation temperature
distribution maps, I see those "cold spots" and "warm spots" which I know
both to be "light cones". And "warm spots" of these two are closer to the Big Bang start.
I have also poorly understood that these spots corresponds to present
size of "superclusters" and maybe (?) also present size of "large voids"?
OPEN QUESTION: Is our Universe much larger that we have ever expected due these
"hidden" cycle periods of 429.4 million years (my own guess) of time flow,
if so, this would then look like structure of "pearls on ribbon" each "pearl on ribbon" would correspond to a "metagalaxy" and time-flow slice of 429.4 million years (my own guess)?
What we know (not much) presently about geology (VOLGANISM)
of Venus and Mars:
1. NASA's Magellan spacegraft mission discovered that
Venus has a geologically young surface with a relatively uniform age of
500+-200 Ma (million years).
Reference:
Geodynamics of Venus (Wikipedia 21.12.2022).
2. The Ages of Mars (Ga=billion years):
Pre-Noachian 4.5-4.1 Ga,
Noachian 4.1-3.7 Ga,
Hesperian 3.7-2.9 Ga,
Amazonian 2.9 Ga - present.
Reference: https://sci.eas.int/web/mars-express/~/55481-the-ages_of_mars
Last Update 1 September 2019.
(21.12.2022)
CORRECTION:Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
I noticed from Figure 5d that at least following rough approximations
of maximums are also present in Figure 5d:
3390 Ma
3250 Ma
3020 Ma
820 Ma.
I put these also in to the list:
I found one interesting experimental reference
of time-series plots from age histograms in recent
Kenneth Condie paper, from (5d.) which I found roughly
following approximate maximums:
3820 Ma3390 Ma
3520 Ma
3450 Ma
3250 Ma
3150 Ma
3020 Ma
2980 Ma820 Ma
2920 Ma
2880 Ma
2780 Ma
2700 Ma
2620 Ma
2580 Ma
2500 Ma
2450 Ma
2380 Ma
2220 Ma
2180 Ma
2120 Ma
2050 Ma
1980 Ma
1890 Ma
1800 Ma
1780 Ma
1700 Ma
1650 Ma
1590 Ma
1450 Ma
1390 Ma
1250 Ma
1190 Ma
1100 Ma
1000 Ma
920 Ma
790 Ma
720 Ma
600 Ma
520 Ma
450 Ma
390 Ma
300 Ma
250 Ma
200 Ma
100 Ma
REFERENCE:
Condie, K. C., 2021.
Revisiting the Mesoproterozoic.
Gondwanda Research, 100 (2021) 44-52.
(Figure 5d, page 48).
-------------------------------
(Figure 5. Raw time-series plots from age histograms
at 10 Myr intervals, regional weighting of ages, U/Pb records
accepted with absolute discordance < 70 Myr and
2-sigma uncertainty < 75 Myr; 25 Myr resolution.
5d. large igneous province (LIP) ages represented
----
in 535 crustal provinces (no regional weighting,
smoothed with 3-weight Gaussian kernel).)
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasI'am sorry about my mistake of missing maximums
Best Regards, Hannu PoropudasI found one (more clear than above reference
of (Condie K C 2021) ?)
reference in which (Condie K C et al 2021) have found
approximately 400-Myr periodicity ?
REFERENCE:
Condie, K. C., Pisarevsky, S. A., Puetz, S. J., 2021.
LIPs, orogens and supercontinents: The ongoing saga.
Gondwana Research, 96 (2021) 105-121.
(Figure 5, page 110 and Figure 8, page 113, --------------------------------------------------------------------
five major age peaks are observed with -------------------------------------------------------------- approximately 400-Myr periodicity, page 118.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wonder that would meaning of last part of the title of the reference "The ongoing saga"
be same as
"a long complicated series of related, usually negative, events" ?
Best Regards,IMPORTANT NOTICE:
Hannu Poropudas
I found one more recent reference than Krapez B refereces I mentioned -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
in beginning of this posting chain of mine few years ago: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REFERENCE:
Barley Mark E., Bekker Andrey, Krapez Brian, 2005.
Late Archean to Early Paleoproterozoic global tectonics,
environmental change and the rise of atmospheric oxygen.
Earth and Planetary Science Letters 238 (2005) 156-171.
(recommended two search words: " breakup" and "breakout"
are for AGEs and AGE periods of continental/supercontinental
or plume events of interest.)
Please take a look!
This (pdf format) text is freely available from the internet and
can be easily found by Google search machine.
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
tiistai 20. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 10.11.00 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:Poropudas, Finland.
perjantai 16. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.29.17 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
torstai 15. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.45.00 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
keskiviikko 14. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.25.40 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
torstai 1. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 10.39.40 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
torstai 22. joulukuuta 2022 klo 9.57.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
keskiviikko 21. joulukuuta 2022 klo 10.38.31 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 19. joulukuuta 2022 klo 12.43.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 26. heinäkuuta 2021 klo 15.42.53 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 10:55:43 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards, Hannu
TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.Simple approximate calculation of the length of the cosmic year
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes. <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages. (sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
R0 = 7.92 +- 0.16 kpc ,(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model).
v0 = 227 km*s^(-1), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
1 pc = 3.26 ly,
1 ly = 9.460528436*10^15 m,
R0 = 7.92 kpc = 7.92*3.26*10^3*9.460528436*10^15 m = 2.442632758*10^20 m,
2*Pi*R0 = 1.534751426*10^21 m,
v0 = 227*10^3*m*s^(-1),
T0 = 2*Pi*R0/v0, (simple circular motion approximation for the length of cosmic year).
T0 = 1.534751426*10^21 / 227*10^3 s = 6.761019496*10^15 s =
= 6.761019496*10^15 / (365.2422*24*60*60) yrs = 214248354.8 yrs =
= approx. 214.25 Myrs.
(simplified error estimates , if R0 = 8.08 kpc, T0 = 218576604.4 yrs = approx. 219 Myrs and
if R0 = 7.76 kpc, T0 = 209920105.2 yrs = approx. 210 Myrs)
Reference:
VERA collaboration, Tomoya Hirota et al., 2020.
The First VERA Astronomy Catalog.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2020) 72 (4), 50 (1-19).
(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasONE SPECULATION OF MINE:
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Oulu / Kiiminki
Finland.
One very brave strange speculation of mine about time-dimension of the whole space:
If I speculate that whole space would be a kind of "mega-galaxy",
then I would speculate that this "mega-galaxy" has a center (inside black hole,
"H-M's big ball" and "H-M's color-forces center planet" instead of singularity).
This would be the origin of time dimension of the whole space.
Time-dimension would be formed from a "frozen time-wave", which consists two kind of direction of flow of time,
one direction forwards time and other backwards of time. (this speculation of mine is similar than H-M's color drawing of a black hole,
which is public visible in my Hannu Poropudas Facebook Page.)
Period of this "frozen time-wave" would have the period of above
"Megacycles" articles of mine mentioned period of megacycles about
429.4 million years, which is my brave strange speculation in this case.
Ofcourse existence of megacycle about 429.4 million years must be observed also in geology of other planets and also properties (redshifts?)
in whole space before this period 429.4 million years of speculation could be true?
Best Regards,WRONG TERM CORRECTION:
Hannu Poropudas, Kolamäentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki / Oulu, Finland.
"mega-galaxy" -> "metagalaxy"
HannuMORE SPECULATIONS OF MINE
(everything should be tested to see if these are true):
I have thought this "metagalaxy" and "time-wave" more closely:
I think that only observable physical phenomena for " time-wave" could be such that this "time-wave" goes though all matter in "metagalaxy"
periodically of cycles of 429.4 million years (this period is my guess) and
"forwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave" would not have any significant
effect to physical matter but "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
could have some kind of warming effect interiors of planets, like Earth, Venus, Mars for example,
which could increase VOLCANISM in those planets ?
In H-M's black hole (also galaxy as I have undestood) drawing "time-wave" have (freezed?) cycles of oscillation of 100000-300000 years.
I do not know that would this second limit 300000 years period be related to second kind on "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamod" shaped
"creation stone of the Universe" due she has drawn
two different kind of "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamond"
shaped "creation stone of the Universe" on one of her drawing (both drawings are also public in Hannu Poropudas Facebook ).
Above mentioned 100000 years periodicity of volcanism would fit nicely to the
"Figure 2. Climate and sea level of the last 450 kyrs" ?
I would prefer volcanism explanation instead explanation of the Milankovitch Theory
of Earth's eccentricity periodicity about 100000 years.
This is due that Earth's orbit eccentricity changes would be too SMALL to cause
these high sea level rises points in this Figure 2 ?
Reference:
Carlson Anders, 2011.
Ice Sheets and Sea Level in Earth's Past.
Nature Education Knowledge 3 (10):3, 8 pages. Figure 2 Sea Level (m).
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
As I look large-scale structure maps of the Universe, I have poorly understood
that "large void" areas could be those "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
and "supercluster" areas could be those "forwards direction of time flow" of
"time-wave"?
As I look Planck-Satellite 2013 results of cosmic backround radiation temperature
distribution maps, I see those "cold spots" and "warm spots" which I know
both to be "light cones". And "warm spots" of these two are closer to the Big Bang start.
I have also poorly understood that these spots corresponds to present
size of "superclusters" and maybe (?) also present size of "large voids"?
OPEN QUESTION: Is our Universe much larger that we have ever expected due these
"hidden" cycle periods of 429.4 million years (my own guess) of time flow,
if so, this would then look like structure of "pearls on ribbon" each "pearl on ribbon" would correspond to a "metagalaxy" and time-flow slice of 429.4 million years (my own guess)?
What we know (not much) presently about geology (VOLGANISM)
of Venus and Mars:
1. NASA's Magellan spacegraft mission discovered that
Venus has a geologically young surface with a relatively uniform age of
500+-200 Ma (million years).
Reference:
Geodynamics of Venus (Wikipedia 21.12.2022).
2. The Ages of Mars (Ga=billion years):
Pre-Noachian 4.5-4.1 Ga,
Noachian 4.1-3.7 Ga,
Hesperian 3.7-2.9 Ga,
Amazonian 2.9 Ga - present.
Reference: https://sci.eas.int/web/mars-express/~/55481-the-ages_of_mars Last Update 1 September 2019.
(21.12.2022)
CORRECTION:Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
I noticed from Figure 5d that at least following rough approximations of maximums are also present in Figure 5d:
3390 Ma
3250 Ma
3020 Ma
820 Ma.
I put these also in to the list:
I found one interesting experimental reference
of time-series plots from age histograms in recent
Kenneth Condie paper, from (5d.) which I found roughly
following approximate maximums:
3820 Ma3390 Ma
3520 Ma
3450 Ma
3250 Ma
3150 Ma
3020 Ma
2980 Ma820 Ma
2920 Ma
2880 Ma
2780 Ma
2700 Ma
2620 Ma
2580 Ma
2500 Ma
2450 Ma
2380 Ma
2220 Ma
2180 Ma
2120 Ma
2050 Ma
1980 Ma
1890 Ma
1800 Ma
1780 Ma
1700 Ma
1650 Ma
1590 Ma
1450 Ma
1390 Ma
1250 Ma
1190 Ma
1100 Ma
1000 Ma
920 Ma
790 Ma
720 Ma
600 Ma
520 Ma
450 Ma
390 Ma
300 Ma
250 Ma
200 Ma
100 Ma
REFERENCE:
Condie, K. C., 2021.
Revisiting the Mesoproterozoic.
Gondwanda Research, 100 (2021) 44-52.
(Figure 5d, page 48).
-------------------------------
(Figure 5. Raw time-series plots from age histograms
at 10 Myr intervals, regional weighting of ages, U/Pb records accepted with absolute discordance < 70 Myr and
2-sigma uncertainty < 75 Myr; 25 Myr resolution.
5d. large igneous province (LIP) ages represented
----
in 535 crustal provinces (no regional weighting,
smoothed with 3-weight Gaussian kernel).)
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasI'am sorry about my mistake of missing maximums
Best Regards, Hannu PoropudasI found one (more clear than above reference
of (Condie K C 2021) ?)
reference in which (Condie K C et al 2021) have found
approximately 400-Myr periodicity ?
REFERENCE:
Condie, K. C., Pisarevsky, S. A., Puetz, S. J., 2021.
LIPs, orogens and supercontinents: The ongoing saga.
Gondwana Research, 96 (2021) 105-121.
(Figure 5, page 110 and Figure 8, page 113, -------------------------------------------------------------------- five major age peaks are observed with -------------------------------------------------------------- approximately 400-Myr periodicity, page 118.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wonder that would meaning of last part of the title of the reference "The ongoing saga"
be same as
"a long complicated series of related, usually negative, events" ?
Best Regards,IMPORTANT NOTICE:
Hannu Poropudas
I found one more recent reference than Krapez B refereces I mentioned -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
in beginning of this posting chain of mine few years ago: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REFERENCE:
Barley Mark E., Bekker Andrey, Krapez Brian, 2005.
Late Archean to Early Paleoproterozoic global tectonics,
environmental change and the rise of atmospheric oxygen.
Earth and Planetary Science Letters 238 (2005) 156-171.
(recommended two search words: " breakup" and "breakout"
are for AGEs and AGE periods of continental/supercontinental
or plume events of interest.)
Please take a look!
This (pdf format) text is freely available from the internet and
can be easily found by Google search machine.
Best Regards, Hannu PoropudasIMPORTANT NOTICE 2:
I found better reference for my selection approximately 2680 Ma
as a starting point of my calculations in my megacycle list
(which was my first posting in this posting chain few years ago).
Krapez B giving approximate age 2680 Ma was OK,
but his reference was wrong.
REFERENCE:
Barley Mark E., Krapez Bryan, Groves David I., Kerrich Rob, 1998.
The Late Archaean bonanza: metallogenic and environmental
consequences of the interaction between mantle plumes,
lithospheric tectonics and global cyclicity.
Precambrian Research 91 (1998) 65-90.
Pages 66 - 67 and Page 80.
Writers of this article have following cycles:
(Page 66: "approximately 360 m.y global tectonic cycle")
(Page 67:
"For each full cycle, there is an initial approximately
180 m.y period, or megacycle, during which an internal ocean opens
(e.g. Atlantic Ocean), followed by a similar length megacycle during
which the internal ocean closes and continents reassemble.")
About 2680 Ma:
(Page 80, search (Find) words which are recommended to use:
"2.68 Ga",
"Pilbara Craton",
"supercycle",
"breakup",
"plume breakout",
"rising global sea-level",
"Indian-type ocean",
"continental flooding" )
I have in my megacyle list these periods (measured from
experimental Pannella G's fossil time data )
429.4 m.y. (global tectonic cycle)
and
429.4 m.y. /2 = 214.7 m.y. (megacycle).
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
keskiviikko 21. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.38.07 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:Hannu Poropudas, Finland.
tiistai 20. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 10.11.00 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
perjantai 16. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.29.17 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
torstai 15. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.45.00 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
keskiviikko 14. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.25.40 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
torstai 1. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 10.39.40 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
torstai 22. joulukuuta 2022 klo 9.57.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
keskiviikko 21. joulukuuta 2022 klo 10.38.31 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 19. joulukuuta 2022 klo 12.43.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 26. heinäkuuta 2021 klo 15.42.53 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 10:55:43 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards,
TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.Simple approximate calculation of the length of the cosmic year
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes. <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages. (sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
R0 = 7.92 +- 0.16 kpc ,(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model).
v0 = 227 km*s^(-1), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
1 pc = 3.26 ly,
1 ly = 9.460528436*10^15 m,
R0 = 7.92 kpc = 7.92*3.26*10^3*9.460528436*10^15 m = 2.442632758*10^20 m,
2*Pi*R0 = 1.534751426*10^21 m,
v0 = 227*10^3*m*s^(-1),
T0 = 2*Pi*R0/v0, (simple circular motion approximation for the length of cosmic year).
T0 = 1.534751426*10^21 / 227*10^3 s = 6.761019496*10^15 s =
= 6.761019496*10^15 / (365.2422*24*60*60) yrs = 214248354.8 yrs =
= approx. 214.25 Myrs.
(simplified error estimates , if R0 = 8.08 kpc, T0 = 218576604.4 yrs = approx. 219 Myrs and
if R0 = 7.76 kpc, T0 = 209920105.2 yrs = approx. 210 Myrs)
Reference:
VERA collaboration, Tomoya Hirota et al., 2020.
The First VERA Astronomy Catalog.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2020) 72 (4), 50 (1-19).
(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasONE SPECULATION OF MINE:
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Oulu / Kiiminki
Finland.
One very brave strange speculation of mine about time-dimension of the whole space:
If I speculate that whole space would be a kind of "mega-galaxy",
then I would speculate that this "mega-galaxy" has a center (inside black hole,
"H-M's big ball" and "H-M's color-forces center planet" instead of singularity).
This would be the origin of time dimension of the whole space.
Time-dimension would be formed from a "frozen time-wave", which consists two kind of direction of flow of time,
one direction forwards time and other backwards of time. (this speculation of mine is similar than H-M's color drawing of a black hole,
which is public visible in my Hannu Poropudas Facebook Page.)
Period of this "frozen time-wave" would have the period of above
"Megacycles" articles of mine mentioned period of megacycles about
429.4 million years, which is my brave strange speculation in this case.
Ofcourse existence of megacycle about 429.4 million years must be observed also in geology of other planets and also properties (redshifts?)
in whole space before this period 429.4 million years of speculation could be true?
Best Regards,WRONG TERM CORRECTION:
Hannu Poropudas, Kolamäentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki / Oulu, Finland.
"mega-galaxy" -> "metagalaxy"
HannuMORE SPECULATIONS OF MINE
(everything should be tested to see if these are true):
I have thought this "metagalaxy" and "time-wave" more closely:
I think that only observable physical phenomena for " time-wave"
could be such that this "time-wave" goes though all matter in "metagalaxy"
periodically of cycles of 429.4 million years (this period is my guess) and
"forwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave" would not have any significant
effect to physical matter but "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
could have some kind of warming effect interiors of planets, like Earth, Venus, Mars for example,
which could increase VOLCANISM in those planets ?
In H-M's black hole (also galaxy as I have undestood) drawing "time-wave" have (freezed?) cycles of oscillation of 100000-300000 years.
I do not know that would this second limit 300000 years period be related to second kind on "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamod" shaped
"creation stone of the Universe" due she has drawn
two different kind of "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamond"
shaped "creation stone of the Universe" on one of her drawing (both drawings are also public in Hannu Poropudas Facebook ).
Above mentioned 100000 years periodicity of volcanism would fit nicely to the
"Figure 2. Climate and sea level of the last 450 kyrs" ?
I would prefer volcanism explanation instead explanation of the Milankovitch Theory
of Earth's eccentricity periodicity about 100000 years.
This is due that Earth's orbit eccentricity changes would be too SMALL to cause
these high sea level rises points in this Figure 2 ?
Reference:
Carlson Anders, 2011.
Ice Sheets and Sea Level in Earth's Past.
Nature Education Knowledge 3 (10):3, 8 pages. Figure 2 Sea Level (m).
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
As I look large-scale structure maps of the Universe, I have poorly understood
that "large void" areas could be those "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
and "supercluster" areas could be those "forwards direction of time flow" of
"time-wave"?
As I look Planck-Satellite 2013 results of cosmic backround radiation temperature
distribution maps, I see those "cold spots" and "warm spots" which I know
both to be "light cones". And "warm spots" of these two are closer to the Big Bang start.
I have also poorly understood that these spots corresponds to present
size of "superclusters" and maybe (?) also present size of "large voids"?
OPEN QUESTION: Is our Universe much larger that we have ever expected due these
"hidden" cycle periods of 429.4 million years (my own guess) of time flow,
if so, this would then look like structure of "pearls on ribbon"
each "pearl on ribbon" would correspond to a "metagalaxy" and time-flow slice of 429.4 million years (my own guess)?
What we know (not much) presently about geology (VOLGANISM)
of Venus and Mars:
1. NASA's Magellan spacegraft mission discovered that
Venus has a geologically young surface with a relatively uniform age of
500+-200 Ma (million years).
Reference:
Geodynamics of Venus (Wikipedia 21.12.2022).
2. The Ages of Mars (Ga=billion years):
Pre-Noachian 4.5-4.1 Ga,
Noachian 4.1-3.7 Ga,
Hesperian 3.7-2.9 Ga,
Amazonian 2.9 Ga - present.
Reference: https://sci.eas.int/web/mars-express/~/55481-the-ages_of_mars Last Update 1 September 2019.
(21.12.2022)
CORRECTION:Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
I noticed from Figure 5d that at least following rough approximations
of maximums are also present in Figure 5d:
3390 Ma
3250 Ma
3020 Ma
820 Ma.
I put these also in to the list:
I found one interesting experimental reference
of time-series plots from age histograms in recent
Kenneth Condie paper, from (5d.) which I found roughly
following approximate maximums:
3820 Ma3390 Ma
3520 Ma
3450 Ma
3250 Ma
3150 Ma
3020 Ma
2980 Ma820 Ma
2920 Ma
2880 Ma
2780 Ma
2700 Ma
2620 Ma
2580 Ma
2500 Ma
2450 Ma
2380 Ma
2220 Ma
2180 Ma
2120 Ma
2050 Ma
1980 Ma
1890 Ma
1800 Ma
1780 Ma
1700 Ma
1650 Ma
1590 Ma
1450 Ma
1390 Ma
1250 Ma
1190 Ma
1100 Ma
1000 Ma
920 Ma
790 Ma
720 Ma
600 Ma
520 Ma
450 Ma
390 Ma
300 Ma
250 Ma
200 Ma
100 Ma
REFERENCE:
Condie, K. C., 2021.
Revisiting the Mesoproterozoic.
Gondwanda Research, 100 (2021) 44-52.
(Figure 5d, page 48).
-------------------------------
(Figure 5. Raw time-series plots from age histograms
at 10 Myr intervals, regional weighting of ages, U/Pb records accepted with absolute discordance < 70 Myr and
2-sigma uncertainty < 75 Myr; 25 Myr resolution.
5d. large igneous province (LIP) ages represented
----
in 535 crustal provinces (no regional weighting,
smoothed with 3-weight Gaussian kernel).)
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasI'am sorry about my mistake of missing maximums
Best Regards, Hannu PoropudasI found one (more clear than above reference
of (Condie K C 2021) ?)
reference in which (Condie K C et al 2021) have found
approximately 400-Myr periodicity ?
REFERENCE:
Condie, K. C., Pisarevsky, S. A., Puetz, S. J., 2021.
LIPs, orogens and supercontinents: The ongoing saga.
Gondwana Research, 96 (2021) 105-121.
(Figure 5, page 110 and Figure 8, page 113, -------------------------------------------------------------------- five major age peaks are observed with -------------------------------------------------------------- approximately 400-Myr periodicity, page 118.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wonder that would meaning of last part of the title of the reference "The ongoing saga"
be same as
"a long complicated series of related, usually negative, events" ?
Best Regards,IMPORTANT NOTICE:
Hannu Poropudas
I found one more recent reference than Krapez B refereces I mentioned -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
in beginning of this posting chain of mine few years ago: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REFERENCE:
Barley Mark E., Bekker Andrey, Krapez Brian, 2005.
Late Archean to Early Paleoproterozoic global tectonics,
environmental change and the rise of atmospheric oxygen.
Earth and Planetary Science Letters 238 (2005) 156-171.
(recommended two search words: " breakup" and "breakout"
are for AGEs and AGE periods of continental/supercontinental
or plume events of interest.)
Please take a look!
This (pdf format) text is freely available from the internet and
can be easily found by Google search machine.
Best Regards, Hannu PoropudasIMPORTANT NOTICE 2:
I found better reference for my selection approximately 2680 Ma
as a starting point of my calculations in my megacycle list
(which was my first posting in this posting chain few years ago).
Krapez B giving approximate age 2680 Ma was OK,
but his reference was wrong.
REFERENCE:
Barley Mark E., Krapez Bryan, Groves David I., Kerrich Rob, 1998.
The Late Archaean bonanza: metallogenic and environmental
consequences of the interaction between mantle plumes,
lithospheric tectonics and global cyclicity.
Precambrian Research 91 (1998) 65-90.
Pages 66 - 67 and Page 80.
Writers of this article have following cycles:
(Page 66: "approximately 360 m.y global tectonic cycle")
(Page 67:
"For each full cycle, there is an initial approximately
180 m.y period, or megacycle, during which an internal ocean opens
(e.g. Atlantic Ocean), followed by a similar length megacycle during
which the internal ocean closes and continents reassemble.")
About 2680 Ma:
(Page 80, search (Find) words which are recommended to use:
"2.68 Ga",
"Pilbara Craton",
"supercycle",
"breakup",
"plume breakout",
"rising global sea-level",
"Indian-type ocean",
"continental flooding" )
I have in my megacyle list these periods (measured from
experimental Pannella G's fossil time data )
429.4 m.y. (global tectonic cycle)
and
429.4 m.y. /2 = 214.7 m.y. (megacycle).
Best Regards, Hannu PoropudasI found one interesting reference which
could give important AGE data of passive margins:
REFERENCE:
Bradley Dwight C., 2008.
Passive margins through earth history.
Earth-Science Reviews 91 (2008) 1-26.
Please take a look AGEs from this reference
and compare them to my megacycles
(say some +-50 Ma accuracy )
for example pp. 20-23.
8. Comparison with postulated supercontinents, pages 20-23.
8.1 Pangea, page 21,
8.2 Pannotia (Gondwana etc), page 21,
8.3 Rodinia, pages 21-22,
8.4 Nuna (=Columbia), page 22,
8.5 Sclavia, Superia, and Vaalbara, page 22,
8.6 Proposed scenario, pages 22-23 and
8.7 Implications for continental reconstructions, page 23.
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
maanantai 3. heinäkuuta 2023 klo 10.56.48 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:Hannu Poropudas, Finland.
keskiviikko 21. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.38.07 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
tiistai 20. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 10.11.00 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
perjantai 16. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.29.17 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
torstai 15. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.45.00 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
keskiviikko 14. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.25.40 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
torstai 1. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 10.39.40 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
torstai 22. joulukuuta 2022 klo 9.57.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
keskiviikko 21. joulukuuta 2022 klo 10.38.31 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 19. joulukuuta 2022 klo 12.43.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 26. heinäkuuta 2021 klo 15.42.53 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 10:55:43 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards,
TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009) Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.Simple approximate calculation of the length of the cosmic year
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes. <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages. (sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
R0 = 7.92 +- 0.16 kpc ,(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model).
v0 = 227 km*s^(-1), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
1 pc = 3.26 ly,
1 ly = 9.460528436*10^15 m,
R0 = 7.92 kpc = 7.92*3.26*10^3*9.460528436*10^15 m = 2.442632758*10^20 m,
2*Pi*R0 = 1.534751426*10^21 m,
v0 = 227*10^3*m*s^(-1),
T0 = 2*Pi*R0/v0, (simple circular motion approximation for the length of cosmic year).
T0 = 1.534751426*10^21 / 227*10^3 s = 6.761019496*10^15 s =
= 6.761019496*10^15 / (365.2422*24*60*60) yrs = 214248354.8 yrs =
= approx. 214.25 Myrs.
(simplified error estimates , if R0 = 8.08 kpc, T0 = 218576604.4 yrs = approx. 219 Myrs and
if R0 = 7.76 kpc, T0 = 209920105.2 yrs = approx. 210 Myrs)
Reference:
VERA collaboration, Tomoya Hirota et al., 2020.
The First VERA Astronomy Catalog.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2020) 72 (4), 50 (1-19).
(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasONE SPECULATION OF MINE:
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Oulu / Kiiminki
Finland.
One very brave strange speculation of mine about time-dimension of the whole space:
If I speculate that whole space would be a kind of "mega-galaxy",
then I would speculate that this "mega-galaxy" has a center (inside black hole,
"H-M's big ball" and "H-M's color-forces center planet" instead of singularity).
This would be the origin of time dimension of the whole space.
Time-dimension would be formed from a "frozen time-wave",
which consists two kind of direction of flow of time, one direction forwards time and other backwards of time. (this speculation of mine is similar than H-M's color drawing of a black hole,
which is public visible in my Hannu Poropudas Facebook Page.)
Period of this "frozen time-wave" would have the period of above
"Megacycles" articles of mine mentioned period of megacycles about
429.4 million years, which is my brave strange speculation in this case.
Ofcourse existence of megacycle about 429.4 million years
must be observed also in geology of other planets and also properties (redshifts?)
in whole space before this period 429.4 million years of speculation could be true?
Best Regards,WRONG TERM CORRECTION:
Hannu Poropudas, Kolamäentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki / Oulu, Finland.
"mega-galaxy" -> "metagalaxy"
HannuMORE SPECULATIONS OF MINE
(everything should be tested to see if these are true):
I have thought this "metagalaxy" and "time-wave" more closely:
I think that only observable physical phenomena for " time-wave"
could be such that this "time-wave" goes though all matter in "metagalaxy"
periodically of cycles of 429.4 million years (this period is my guess) and
"forwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave" would not have any significant
effect to physical matter but "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
could have some kind of warming effect interiors of planets, like Earth, Venus, Mars for example,
which could increase VOLCANISM in those planets ?
In H-M's black hole (also galaxy as I have undestood) drawing
"time-wave" have (freezed?) cycles of oscillation of 100000-300000 years.
I do not know that would this second limit 300000 years period
be related to second kind on "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamod" shaped
"creation stone of the Universe" due she has drawn
two different kind of "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamond"
shaped "creation stone of the Universe" on one of her drawing
(both drawings are also public in Hannu Poropudas Facebook ).
Above mentioned 100000 years periodicity of volcanism would fit nicely to the
"Figure 2. Climate and sea level of the last 450 kyrs" ?
I would prefer volcanism explanation instead explanation of the Milankovitch Theory
of Earth's eccentricity periodicity about 100000 years.
This is due that Earth's orbit eccentricity changes would be too SMALL to cause
these high sea level rises points in this Figure 2 ?
Reference:
Carlson Anders, 2011.
Ice Sheets and Sea Level in Earth's Past.
Nature Education Knowledge 3 (10):3, 8 pages. Figure 2 Sea Level (m).
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
As I look large-scale structure maps of the Universe, I have poorly understood
that "large void" areas could be those "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
and "supercluster" areas could be those "forwards direction of time flow" of
"time-wave"?
As I look Planck-Satellite 2013 results of cosmic backround radiation temperature
distribution maps, I see those "cold spots" and "warm spots" which I know
both to be "light cones". And "warm spots" of these two are closer to the Big Bang start.
I have also poorly understood that these spots corresponds to present
size of "superclusters" and maybe (?) also present size of "large voids"?
OPEN QUESTION: Is our Universe much larger that we have ever expected due these
"hidden" cycle periods of 429.4 million years (my own guess) of time flow,
if so, this would then look like structure of "pearls on ribbon"
each "pearl on ribbon" would correspond to a "metagalaxy" and
time-flow slice of 429.4 million years (my own guess)?
What we know (not much) presently about geology (VOLGANISM) of Venus and Mars:
1. NASA's Magellan spacegraft mission discovered that
Venus has a geologically young surface with a relatively uniform age of
500+-200 Ma (million years).
Reference:
Geodynamics of Venus (Wikipedia 21.12.2022).
2. The Ages of Mars (Ga=billion years):
Pre-Noachian 4.5-4.1 Ga,
Noachian 4.1-3.7 Ga,
Hesperian 3.7-2.9 Ga,
Amazonian 2.9 Ga - present.
Reference: https://sci.eas.int/web/mars-express/~/55481-the-ages_of_mars
Last Update 1 September 2019.
(21.12.2022)
CORRECTION:Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
I noticed from Figure 5d that at least following rough approximations
of maximums are also present in Figure 5d:
3390 Ma
3250 Ma
3020 Ma
820 Ma.
I put these also in to the list:
I found one interesting experimental reference
of time-series plots from age histograms in recent
Kenneth Condie paper, from (5d.) which I found roughly
following approximate maximums:
3820 Ma3390 Ma
3520 Ma
3450 Ma
3250 Ma
3150 Ma
3020 Ma
2980 Ma820 Ma
2920 Ma
2880 Ma
2780 Ma
2700 Ma
2620 Ma
2580 Ma
2500 Ma
2450 Ma
2380 Ma
2220 Ma
2180 Ma
2120 Ma
2050 Ma
1980 Ma
1890 Ma
1800 Ma
1780 Ma
1700 Ma
1650 Ma
1590 Ma
1450 Ma
1390 Ma
1250 Ma
1190 Ma
1100 Ma
1000 Ma
920 Ma
790 Ma
720 Ma
600 Ma
520 Ma
450 Ma
390 Ma
300 Ma
250 Ma
200 Ma
100 Ma
REFERENCE:
Condie, K. C., 2021.
Revisiting the Mesoproterozoic.
Gondwanda Research, 100 (2021) 44-52.
(Figure 5d, page 48).
-------------------------------
(Figure 5. Raw time-series plots from age histograms
at 10 Myr intervals, regional weighting of ages, U/Pb records accepted with absolute discordance < 70 Myr and
2-sigma uncertainty < 75 Myr; 25 Myr resolution.
5d. large igneous province (LIP) ages represented
----
in 535 crustal provinces (no regional weighting,
smoothed with 3-weight Gaussian kernel).)
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasI'am sorry about my mistake of missing maximums
Best Regards, Hannu PoropudasI found one (more clear than above reference
of (Condie K C 2021) ?)
reference in which (Condie K C et al 2021) have found
approximately 400-Myr periodicity ?
REFERENCE:
Condie, K. C., Pisarevsky, S. A., Puetz, S. J., 2021.
LIPs, orogens and supercontinents: The ongoing saga.
Gondwana Research, 96 (2021) 105-121.
(Figure 5, page 110 and Figure 8, page 113, -------------------------------------------------------------------- five major age peaks are observed with -------------------------------------------------------------- approximately 400-Myr periodicity, page 118.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wonder that would meaning of last part of the title of the reference
"The ongoing saga"
be same as
"a long complicated series of related, usually negative, events" ?
Best Regards,IMPORTANT NOTICE:
Hannu Poropudas
I found one more recent reference than Krapez B refereces I mentioned -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
in beginning of this posting chain of mine few years ago: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REFERENCE:
Barley Mark E., Bekker Andrey, Krapez Brian, 2005.
Late Archean to Early Paleoproterozoic global tectonics,
environmental change and the rise of atmospheric oxygen.
Earth and Planetary Science Letters 238 (2005) 156-171.
(recommended two search words: " breakup" and "breakout"
are for AGEs and AGE periods of continental/supercontinental
or plume events of interest.)
Please take a look!
This (pdf format) text is freely available from the internet and
can be easily found by Google search machine.
Best Regards, Hannu PoropudasIMPORTANT NOTICE 2:
I found better reference for my selection approximately 2680 Ma
as a starting point of my calculations in my megacycle list
(which was my first posting in this posting chain few years ago).
Krapez B giving approximate age 2680 Ma was OK,
but his reference was wrong.
REFERENCE:
Barley Mark E., Krapez Bryan, Groves David I., Kerrich Rob, 1998.
The Late Archaean bonanza: metallogenic and environmental
consequences of the interaction between mantle plumes,
lithospheric tectonics and global cyclicity.
Precambrian Research 91 (1998) 65-90.
Pages 66 - 67 and Page 80.
Writers of this article have following cycles:
(Page 66: "approximately 360 m.y global tectonic cycle")
(Page 67:
"For each full cycle, there is an initial approximately
180 m.y period, or megacycle, during which an internal ocean opens
(e.g. Atlantic Ocean), followed by a similar length megacycle during which the internal ocean closes and continents reassemble.")
About 2680 Ma:
(Page 80, search (Find) words which are recommended to use:
"2.68 Ga",
"Pilbara Craton",
"supercycle",
"breakup",
"plume breakout",
"rising global sea-level",
"Indian-type ocean",
"continental flooding" )
I have in my megacyle list these periods (measured from
experimental Pannella G's fossil time data )
429.4 m.y. (global tectonic cycle)
and
429.4 m.y. /2 = 214.7 m.y. (megacycle).
Best Regards, Hannu PoropudasI found one interesting reference which
could give important AGE data of passive margins:
REFERENCE:
Bradley Dwight C., 2008.
Passive margins through earth history.
Earth-Science Reviews 91 (2008) 1-26.
Please take a look AGEs from this reference
and compare them to my megacycles
(say some +-50 Ma accuracy )
for example pp. 20-23.
8. Comparison with postulated supercontinents, pages 20-23.
8.1 Pangea, page 21,
8.2 Pannotia (Gondwana etc), page 21,
8.3 Rodinia, pages 21-22,
8.4 Nuna (=Columbia), page 22,
8.5 Sclavia, Superia, and Vaalbara, page 22,
8.6 Proposed scenario, pages 22-23 and
8.7 Implications for continental reconstructions, page 23.
Best Regards, Hannu PoropudasI found second interesting reference which could
give important AGE data of passive margins:
REFERENCES (Important in my opinion):
Bradley Dwight C., 2011.
Secular trends in the geologic record
and the supercontinent cycle.
Earth-Science Reviews 108 (2011) 16-33.
Bradley Dwight C., 2008.
Passive margins through earth history.
Earth-Science Reviews 91 (2008) 1-26.
I looked only "quality ranking A" (= best) points of plot
(Age (Ma), Passive-margin abundance)
of Fig. 11 on page 21 (Passive-margins abundance (Bradley, 2008))
and I found for example (for Pangea) following approximate age limits
with (Bradley, 2008, 2011) interpretations:
maximum 1850 Ma - 2050 Ma (break up) ->
start increasing (750 Ma - 800 Ma)->
maximum (500 Ma - 550 Ma) (break up) ->
decreasing (350 Ma - 500 Ma) ->
minimum (low level) (250 Ma - 350 Ma) (assembly) ->
increasing (250 Ma -150 Ma ) ->
maximum (150 Ma - 200 Ma) (break up) ->
decreasing (0 Ma - 150 Ma).
Last assembly and break up could fit well to the Pangea ?
My megacycles (say +,-50 Ma accuracy) which seems
to fit also to these age limits could be following ?
2040 Ma - 1820 Ma,
...
760 Ma - 540 Ma,
540 Ma - 340 Ma,
340 Ma - 130 Ma,
130 Ma -
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
keskiviikko 5. heinäkuuta 2023 klo 11.35.43 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:Hannu Poropudas, Finland.
maanantai 3. heinäkuuta 2023 klo 10.56.48 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
keskiviikko 21. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.38.07 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
tiistai 20. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 10.11.00 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
perjantai 16. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.29.17 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
torstai 15. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.45.00 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
keskiviikko 14. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 9.25.40 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
torstai 1. kesäkuuta 2023 klo 10.39.40 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
torstai 22. joulukuuta 2022 klo 9.57.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
keskiviikko 21. joulukuuta 2022 klo 10.38.31 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 19. joulukuuta 2022 klo 12.43.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 26. heinäkuuta 2021 klo 15.42.53 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 10:55:43 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards,
TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009) Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.Simple approximate calculation of the length of the cosmic year
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes. <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages. (sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
R0 = 7.92 +- 0.16 kpc ,(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model).
v0 = 227 km*s^(-1), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
1 pc = 3.26 ly,
1 ly = 9.460528436*10^15 m,
R0 = 7.92 kpc = 7.92*3.26*10^3*9.460528436*10^15 m = 2.442632758*10^20 m,
2*Pi*R0 = 1.534751426*10^21 m,
v0 = 227*10^3*m*s^(-1),
T0 = 2*Pi*R0/v0, (simple circular motion approximation for the length of cosmic year).
T0 = 1.534751426*10^21 / 227*10^3 s = 6.761019496*10^15 s =
= 6.761019496*10^15 / (365.2422*24*60*60) yrs = 214248354.8 yrs =
= approx. 214.25 Myrs.
(simplified error estimates , if R0 = 8.08 kpc, T0 = 218576604.4 yrs = approx. 219 Myrs and
if R0 = 7.76 kpc, T0 = 209920105.2 yrs = approx. 210 Myrs)
Reference:
VERA collaboration, Tomoya Hirota et al., 2020.
The First VERA Astronomy Catalog.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2020) 72 (4), 50 (1-19).
(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasONE SPECULATION OF MINE:
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Oulu / Kiiminki
Finland.
One very brave strange speculation of mine about time-dimension of the whole space:
If I speculate that whole space would be a kind of "mega-galaxy",
then I would speculate that this "mega-galaxy" has a center (inside black hole,
"H-M's big ball" and "H-M's color-forces center planet" instead of singularity).
This would be the origin of time dimension of the whole space.
Time-dimension would be formed from a "frozen time-wave",
which consists two kind of direction of flow of time, one direction forwards time and other backwards of time.
(this speculation of mine is similar than H-M's color drawing of a black hole,
which is public visible in my Hannu Poropudas Facebook Page.)
Period of this "frozen time-wave" would have the period of above
"Megacycles" articles of mine mentioned period of megacycles about
429.4 million years, which is my brave strange speculation in this case.
Ofcourse existence of megacycle about 429.4 million years
must be observed also in geology of other planets and also properties (redshifts?)
in whole space before this period 429.4 million years of speculation could be true?
Best Regards,WRONG TERM CORRECTION:
Hannu Poropudas, Kolamäentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki / Oulu, Finland.
"mega-galaxy" -> "metagalaxy"
HannuMORE SPECULATIONS OF MINE
(everything should be tested to see if these are true):
I have thought this "metagalaxy" and "time-wave" more closely:
I think that only observable physical phenomena for " time-wave"
could be such that this "time-wave" goes though all matter in "metagalaxy"
periodically of cycles of 429.4 million years (this period is my guess) and
"forwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave" would not have any significant
effect to physical matter but "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
could have some kind of warming effect interiors of planets,
like Earth, Venus, Mars for example,
which could increase VOLCANISM in those planets ?
In H-M's black hole (also galaxy as I have undestood) drawing
"time-wave" have (freezed?) cycles of oscillation of 100000-300000 years.
I do not know that would this second limit 300000 years period
be related to second kind on "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamod" shaped
"creation stone of the Universe" due she has drawn
two different kind of "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamond" shaped "creation stone of the Universe" on one of her drawing
(both drawings are also public in Hannu Poropudas Facebook ).
Above mentioned 100000 years periodicity of volcanism would fit nicely to the
"Figure 2. Climate and sea level of the last 450 kyrs" ?
I would prefer volcanism explanation instead explanation of the Milankovitch Theory
of Earth's eccentricity periodicity about 100000 years.
This is due that Earth's orbit eccentricity changes would be too SMALL to cause
these high sea level rises points in this Figure 2 ?
Reference:
Carlson Anders, 2011.
Ice Sheets and Sea Level in Earth's Past.
Nature Education Knowledge 3 (10):3, 8 pages. Figure 2 Sea Level (m).
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
As I look large-scale structure maps of the Universe, I have poorly understood
that "large void" areas could be those "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
and "supercluster" areas could be those "forwards direction of time flow" of
"time-wave"?
As I look Planck-Satellite 2013 results of cosmic backround radiation temperature
distribution maps, I see those "cold spots" and "warm spots" which I know
both to be "light cones". And "warm spots" of these two are closer to the Big Bang start.
I have also poorly understood that these spots corresponds to present
size of "superclusters" and maybe (?) also present size of "large voids"?
OPEN QUESTION: Is our Universe much larger that we have ever expected due these
"hidden" cycle periods of 429.4 million years (my own guess) of time flow,
if so, this would then look like structure of "pearls on ribbon"
each "pearl on ribbon" would correspond to a "metagalaxy" and
time-flow slice of 429.4 million years (my own guess)?
What we know (not much) presently about geology (VOLGANISM)
of Venus and Mars:
1. NASA's Magellan spacegraft mission discovered that Venus has a geologically young surface with a relatively uniform age of
500+-200 Ma (million years).
Reference:
Geodynamics of Venus (Wikipedia 21.12.2022).
2. The Ages of Mars (Ga=billion years):
Pre-Noachian 4.5-4.1 Ga,
Noachian 4.1-3.7 Ga,
Hesperian 3.7-2.9 Ga,
Amazonian 2.9 Ga - present.
Reference: https://sci.eas.int/web/mars-express/~/55481-the-ages_of_mars
Last Update 1 September 2019.
(21.12.2022)
CORRECTION:Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
I noticed from Figure 5d that at least following rough approximations
of maximums are also present in Figure 5d:
3390 Ma
3250 Ma
3020 Ma
820 Ma.
I put these also in to the list:
I found one interesting experimental reference
of time-series plots from age histograms in recent
Kenneth Condie paper, from (5d.) which I found roughly following approximate maximums:
3820 Ma3390 Ma
3520 Ma
3450 Ma
3250 Ma
3150 Ma
3020 Ma
2980 Ma820 Ma
2920 Ma
2880 Ma
2780 Ma
2700 Ma
2620 Ma
2580 Ma
2500 Ma
2450 Ma
2380 Ma
2220 Ma
2180 Ma
2120 Ma
2050 Ma
1980 Ma
1890 Ma
1800 Ma
1780 Ma
1700 Ma
1650 Ma
1590 Ma
1450 Ma
1390 Ma
1250 Ma
1190 Ma
1100 Ma
1000 Ma
920 Ma
790 Ma
720 Ma
600 Ma
520 Ma
450 Ma
390 Ma
300 Ma
250 Ma
200 Ma
100 Ma
REFERENCE:
Condie, K. C., 2021.
Revisiting the Mesoproterozoic.
Gondwanda Research, 100 (2021) 44-52.
(Figure 5d, page 48).
-------------------------------
(Figure 5. Raw time-series plots from age histograms
at 10 Myr intervals, regional weighting of ages, U/Pb records accepted with absolute discordance < 70 Myr and
2-sigma uncertainty < 75 Myr; 25 Myr resolution.
5d. large igneous province (LIP) ages represented
----
in 535 crustal provinces (no regional weighting,
smoothed with 3-weight Gaussian kernel).)
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasI'am sorry about my mistake of missing maximums
Best Regards, Hannu PoropudasI found one (more clear than above reference
of (Condie K C 2021) ?)
reference in which (Condie K C et al 2021) have found approximately 400-Myr periodicity ?
REFERENCE:
Condie, K. C., Pisarevsky, S. A., Puetz, S. J., 2021.
LIPs, orogens and supercontinents: The ongoing saga.
Gondwana Research, 96 (2021) 105-121.
(Figure 5, page 110 and Figure 8, page 113, --------------------------------------------------------------------
five major age peaks are observed with -------------------------------------------------------------- approximately 400-Myr periodicity, page 118.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wonder that would meaning of last part of the title of the reference
"The ongoing saga"
be same as
"a long complicated series of related, usually negative, events" ?
Best Regards,IMPORTANT NOTICE:
Hannu Poropudas
I found one more recent reference than Krapez B refereces I mentioned
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
in beginning of this posting chain of mine few years ago: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REFERENCE:
Barley Mark E., Bekker Andrey, Krapez Brian, 2005.
Late Archean to Early Paleoproterozoic global tectonics, environmental change and the rise of atmospheric oxygen.
Earth and Planetary Science Letters 238 (2005) 156-171.
(recommended two search words: " breakup" and "breakout"
are for AGEs and AGE periods of continental/supercontinental
or plume events of interest.)
Please take a look!
This (pdf format) text is freely available from the internet and
can be easily found by Google search machine.
Best Regards, Hannu PoropudasIMPORTANT NOTICE 2:
I found better reference for my selection approximately 2680 Ma
as a starting point of my calculations in my megacycle list
(which was my first posting in this posting chain few years ago). Krapez B giving approximate age 2680 Ma was OK,
but his reference was wrong.
REFERENCE:
Barley Mark E., Krapez Bryan, Groves David I., Kerrich Rob, 1998.
The Late Archaean bonanza: metallogenic and environmental
consequences of the interaction between mantle plumes,
lithospheric tectonics and global cyclicity.
Precambrian Research 91 (1998) 65-90.
Pages 66 - 67 and Page 80.
Writers of this article have following cycles:
(Page 66: "approximately 360 m.y global tectonic cycle")
(Page 67:
"For each full cycle, there is an initial approximately
180 m.y period, or megacycle, during which an internal ocean opens (e.g. Atlantic Ocean), followed by a similar length megacycle during which the internal ocean closes and continents reassemble.")
About 2680 Ma:
(Page 80, search (Find) words which are recommended to use:
"2.68 Ga",
"Pilbara Craton",
"supercycle",
"breakup",
"plume breakout",
"rising global sea-level",
"Indian-type ocean",
"continental flooding" )
I have in my megacyle list these periods (measured from
experimental Pannella G's fossil time data )
429.4 m.y. (global tectonic cycle)
and
429.4 m.y. /2 = 214.7 m.y. (megacycle).
Best Regards, Hannu PoropudasI found one interesting reference which
could give important AGE data of passive margins:
REFERENCE:
Bradley Dwight C., 2008.
Passive margins through earth history.
Earth-Science Reviews 91 (2008) 1-26.
Please take a look AGEs from this reference
and compare them to my megacycles
(say some +-50 Ma accuracy )
for example pp. 20-23.
8. Comparison with postulated supercontinents, pages 20-23.
8.1 Pangea, page 21,
8.2 Pannotia (Gondwana etc), page 21,
8.3 Rodinia, pages 21-22,
8.4 Nuna (=Columbia), page 22,
8.5 Sclavia, Superia, and Vaalbara, page 22,
8.6 Proposed scenario, pages 22-23 and
8.7 Implications for continental reconstructions, page 23.
Best Regards, Hannu PoropudasI found second interesting reference which could
give important AGE data of passive margins:
REFERENCES (Important in my opinion):
Bradley Dwight C., 2011.
Secular trends in the geologic record
and the supercontinent cycle.
Earth-Science Reviews 108 (2011) 16-33.
Bradley Dwight C., 2008.
Passive margins through earth history.
Earth-Science Reviews 91 (2008) 1-26.
I looked only "quality ranking A" (= best) points of plot
(Age (Ma), Passive-margin abundance)
of Fig. 11 on page 21 (Passive-margins abundance (Bradley, 2008))
and I found for example (for Pangea) following approximate age limits
with (Bradley, 2008, 2011) interpretations:
maximum 1850 Ma - 2050 Ma (break up) ->
start increasing (750 Ma - 800 Ma)->
maximum (500 Ma - 550 Ma) (break up) ->
decreasing (350 Ma - 500 Ma) ->
minimum (low level) (250 Ma - 350 Ma) (assembly) ->
increasing (250 Ma -150 Ma ) ->
maximum (150 Ma - 200 Ma) (break up) ->
decreasing (0 Ma - 150 Ma).
Last assembly and break up could fit well to the Pangea ?
My megacycles (say +,-50 Ma accuracy) which seems
to fit also to these age limits could be following ?
2040 Ma - 1820 Ma,
...
760 Ma - 540 Ma,
540 Ma - 340 Ma,
340 Ma - 130 Ma,
130 Ma -
Best Regards, Hannu PoropudasFor comparison I put below copy from text part of
(Bradley 2011, pp. 20, 24, 25).
Ages start of passive margins and ages end of passive margins could
be perhaps too inaccurate to investigate length of supercontinent cycle ?
More accurate maximum and minimum (low level) ages
of passive margins (with ranking quality A = best)
could be useful to use for this purpose ?
COPY from (Bradley 2011, pp. 20, 24, 25) below:
"The Phanerozoic age distribution of passive margins (Fig. 46)
tracks the assembly, tenure, and disassembly of Pangea.
The tenure of Pangea coincided with a low at 300 to 275 Ma.
The increase in passive margins since then tracks Pangea's breakup;
the sharp decline from ca. 500 toca. 350 Ma concides with
Pangea's assembly."
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
torstai 22. joulukuuta 2022 klo 9.57.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:Finland.
keskiviikko 21. joulukuuta 2022 klo 10.38.31 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 19. joulukuuta 2022 klo 12.43.20 UTC+2 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
maanantai 26. heinäkuuta 2021 klo 15.42.53 UTC+3 Hannu Poropudas kirjoitti:
On Friday, July 17, 2020 at 10:55:43 AM UTC+3, Hannu Poropudas wrote:
On Wednesday, July 1, 2020 at 8:13:10 PM UTC+3, hapor...@gmail.com wrote:
I forget to mention one asumption which I have used: Earth's distance from the Sun have not significantly changed. This assumption I used when I made table of Earth's rotation rate (TABLE 4, -T/10^4,Hours/Day). Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas,
TABLE 4, -T/10^4 centuries, Hour/Day is poorly visible in above, so I put this again here:
(Author: Hannu K.J. Poropudas, Vesaisentie 9E,
90900 Kiiminki, Finland, Date: 13.1.2009)
Assumption: Distance between the Earth
and the Sun has not changed significantly
during Earth's life time (about 4550 Ma).
Main intended area of use of these figures
which are calculated from TABLE 2 is roughly
about 0-2000 Ma.
TABLE 4
-T/10^4 Hours/Day
centuries
-----------------
0 24,03
52,2 23,63
52,2 23,39
226,2 23,63
276,9 22,98
276,9 22,41
335,6 22,27
340,2 22,05
340,2 21,91
367,8 21,88
367,8 21,67
367,8 21,26
394,5 21,88
408,2 20,97
429,4 21,69
435,8 21,21
445 20,67
481,6 21,37
481,6 21,17
558,1 20,3
655,6 21,37
706,3 20,83
706,3 20,36
765 20,24
769,6 20,06
769,6 19,95
797,2 19,92
797,2 19,75
797,2 19,41
823,9 19,92
837,6 19,16
858,8 19,77
865,2 19,37
874,4 18,92
911 19,5
911 19,33
987,5 18,61
1085 19,5
1135,7 19,05
1135,7 18,66
1194,4 18,56
1199 18,41
1199 18,31
1226,6 18,29
1226,6 18,14
1226,6 17,86
1253,3 18,29
1267 17,65
1288,2 18,16
1294,6 17,82
1303,8 17,44
1340,4 17,93
1340,4 17,79
1416,9 17,17
1514,4 17,93
1565,1 17,55
1565,1 17,21
1623,8 17,13
1628,4 17
1628,4 16,92
1656 16,9
1656 16,78
1656 16,53
1682,7 16,9
1696,4 16,35
1717,6 16,79
1724 16,5
1733,2 16,17
1769,8 16,59
1769,8 16,47
1846,3 15,95
1943,8 16,59
1994,5 16,27
1994,5 15,98
-------------
2053,2 15,91
2057,8 15,8
2057,8 15,72
2085,4 15,71
2085,4 15,6
2085,4 15,39
2112,1 15,71
2125,8 15,23
2147 15,61
2153,4 15,36
2162,6 15,08
2199,2 15,44
2199,2 15,34
2275,7 14,88
2373,2 15,44
2423,9 15,16
2423,9 14,91
2482,6 14,85
2487,2 14,75
2487,2 14,69
2514,8 14,68
2514,8 14,58
2514,8 14,4
2541,5 14,68
2555,2 14,26
2576,4 14,59
2582,8 14,37
2592 14,12
2628,6 14,44
2628,6 14,35
2705,1 13,95
2802,6 14,44
2853,3 14,2
2853,3 13,98
2912 13,92
2916,6 13,84
2916,6 13,78
2944,2 13,77
2944,2 13,69
2944,2 13,52
2970,9 13,77
2984,6 13,4
3005,8 13,69
3012,2 13,5
3021,4 13,28
3058 13,56
3058 13,48
3134,5 13,13
3232 13,56
3282,7 13,35
3282,7 13,15
3341,4 13,1
3346 13,03
3346 12,98
3373,6 12,97
3373,6 12,89
3373,6 12,75
3400,3 12,97
3414 12,64
3435,2 12,9
3441,6 12,73
3450,8 12,53
3487,4 12,79
3487,4 12,71
3563,9 12,4
3661,4 12,79
3712,1 12,59
3712,1 12,42
3770,8 12,38
3775,4 12,31
3775,4 12,26
3803 12,25
3803 12,19
3803 12,06
-------------
3829,7 12,25
3843,4 11,96
3864,6 12,2
3871 12,04
3880,2 11,87
3916,8 12,09
3916,8 12,03
3993,3 11,74
4090,8 12,09
4141,5 11,92
4141,5 11,76
4200,2 11,72
4204,8 11,66
4204,8 11,62
4232,4 11,62
4232,4 11,56
4232,4 11,44
4259,1 11,62
4272,8 11,35
4294 11,56
4300,4 11,43
4309,6 11,27
4346,2 11,47
4346,2 11,41
4422,7 11,16
4520,2 11,47
-------------
(4570,9 11,31
4570,9 11,17
4629,6 11,14
4634,2 11,08
4634,2 11,05
4661,8 11,04
4661,8 10,99
4661,8 10,88
4688,5 11,04
4702,2 10,8
4723,4 10,99
4729,8 10,87
4739 10,73
4775,6 10,91
4775,6 10,86
4852,1 10,62
4949,6 10,91)
Reference:
Poropudas, Hannu, 2009.Simple approximate calculation of the length of the cosmic year
Some Linear Extrapolations of Pannella’s
Fossil Time Data for Test Purposes. <533c8763-511e-4ec6-a69e-8f3f1e5d1591
(at)
z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:46:49 -0800 (PST).
10 pages.
(sci.bio.paleontology,sci.astro,sci.geo.geology, sci.physics,sci.math)
(mathematician <haporopu
(at)
luukku.com>)
R0 = 7.92 +- 0.16 kpc ,(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model).
v0 = 227 km*s^(-1), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
1 pc = 3.26 ly,
1 ly = 9.460528436*10^15 m,
R0 = 7.92 kpc = 7.92*3.26*10^3*9.460528436*10^15 m = 2.442632758*10^20 m,
2*Pi*R0 = 1.534751426*10^21 m,
v0 = 227*10^3*m*s^(-1),
T0 = 2*Pi*R0/v0, (simple circular motion approximation for the length of cosmic year).
T0 = 1.534751426*10^21 / 227*10^3 s = 6.761019496*10^15 s =
= 6.761019496*10^15 / (365.2422*24*60*60) yrs = 214248354.8 yrs =
= approx. 214.25 Myrs.
(simplified error estimates , if R0 = 8.08 kpc, T0 = 218576604.4 yrs = approx. 219 Myrs and
if R0 = 7.76 kpc, T0 = 209920105.2 yrs = approx. 210 Myrs)
Reference:
VERA collaboration, Tomoya Hirota et al., 2020.
The First VERA Astronomy Catalog.
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (2020) 72 (4), 50 (1-19).
(p. 50-15 / Table 3, power-law model), (p. 50-16/Fig 6, p. 50-17), (no error estimation for simplicity).
Best Regards,
Hannu PoropudasONE SPECULATION OF MINE:
Kolamäentie 9E,
90900 Oulu / Kiiminki
Finland.
One very brave strange speculation of mine about time-dimension of the whole space:
If I speculate that whole space would be a kind of "mega-galaxy",
then I would speculate that this "mega-galaxy" has a center (inside black hole,
"H-M's big ball" and "H-M's color-forces center planet" instead of singularity).
This would be the origin of time dimension of the whole space.
Time-dimension would be formed from a "frozen time-wave",
which consists two kind of direction of flow of time,
one direction forwards time and other backwards of time.
(this speculation of mine is similar than H-M's color drawing of a black hole,
which is public visible in my Hannu Poropudas Facebook Page.)
Period of this "frozen time-wave" would have the period of above "Megacycles" articles of mine mentioned period of megacycles about 429.4 million years, which is my brave strange speculation in this case.
Ofcourse existence of megacycle about 429.4 million years
must be observed also in geology of other planets and also properties (redshifts?)
in whole space before this period 429.4 million years of speculation could be true?
Best Regards,WRONG TERM CORRECTION:
Hannu Poropudas, Kolamäentie 9E, 90900 Kiiminki / Oulu, Finland.
"mega-galaxy" -> "metagalaxy"
HannuMORE SPECULATIONS OF MINE
(everything should be tested to see if these are true):
I have thought this "metagalaxy" and "time-wave" more closely:
I think that only observable physical phenomena for " time-wave"
could be such that this "time-wave" goes though all matter in "metagalaxy" periodically of cycles of 429.4 million years (this period is my guess) and
"forwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave" would not have any significant
effect to physical matter but "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
could have some kind of warming effect interiors of planets,
like Earth, Venus, Mars for example,
which could increase VOLCANISM in those planets ?
In H-M's black hole (also galaxy as I have undestood) drawing
"time-wave" have (freezed?) cycles of oscillation of 100000-300000 years. I do not know that would this second limit 300000 years period
be related to second kind on "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamod" shaped "creation stone of the Universe" due she has drawn
two different kind of "H-M's 8/8 single cut diamond"
shaped "creation stone of the Universe" on one of her drawing
(both drawings are also public in Hannu Poropudas Facebook ).
Above mentioned 100000 years periodicity of volcanism would fit nicely to the
"Figure 2. Climate and sea level of the last 450 kyrs" ?
I would prefer volcanism explanation instead explanation of the Milankovitch Theory
of Earth's eccentricity periodicity about 100000 years.
This is due that Earth's orbit eccentricity changes would be too SMALL to cause
these high sea level rises points in this Figure 2 ?
Reference:
Carlson Anders, 2011.
Ice Sheets and Sea Level in Earth's Past.
Nature Education Knowledge 3 (10):3, 8 pages. Figure 2 Sea Level (m).
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
As I look large-scale structure maps of the Universe, I have poorly understood
that "large void" areas could be those "backwards direction of time flow" of "time-wave"
and "supercluster" areas could be those "forwards direction of time flow" of
"time-wave"?
As I look Planck-Satellite 2013 results of cosmic backround radiation temperature
distribution maps, I see those "cold spots" and "warm spots" which I know both to be "light cones". And "warm spots" of these two are closer to the Big Bang start.
I have also poorly understood that these spots corresponds to present
size of "superclusters" and maybe (?) also present size of "large voids"?
OPEN QUESTION: Is our Universe much larger that we have ever expected due these
"hidden" cycle periods of 429.4 million years (my own guess) of time flow, if so, this would then look like structure of "pearls on ribbon"
each "pearl on ribbon" would correspond to a "metagalaxy" and
time-flow slice of 429.4 million years (my own guess)?
What we know (not much) presently about geology (VOLGANISM)
of Venus and Mars:
1. NASA's Magellan spacegraft mission discovered that
Venus has a geologically young surface with a relatively uniform age of 500+-200 Ma (million years).
Reference:
Geodynamics of Venus (Wikipedia 21.12.2022).
2. The Ages of Mars (Ga=billion years):
Pre-Noachian 4.5-4.1 Ga,
Noachian 4.1-3.7 Ga,
Hesperian 3.7-2.9 Ga,
Amazonian 2.9 Ga - present.
Reference:
https://sci.eas.int/web/mars-express/~/55481-the-ages_of_mars
Last Update 1 September 2019.
(21.12.2022)
Best Regards, Hannu Poropudas
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 365 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 04:37:48 |
Calls: | 7,785 |
Calls today: | 7 |
Files: | 12,914 |
Messages: | 5,750,429 |