Tribute to Philip Alexander Grahame Russell (1947-1975)
Killed 3rd September 1975 by Elizabeth Alexandra Mary.
http://www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=2146414233
1. Re: Mishkan 1.2m (4ft) below Heel Stone, UK by GarryDenke: I am at Baby Dolls. Why you working?
http://www.babydolls.com/ IT IS DO...
2. Re: Mishkan 1.2m (4ft) below Heel Stone, UK (we can see...) by GarryDenke: Wallies of Stonehenge, thanks. "British Archaeologists could not find M...
3. Mishkan 1.2m (4ft) below Heel Stone, UK (we can see...) by Anonymous: Mishkan 1.2m (4ft) below Heel Stone, UK (we can see...)...
4. Mishkan 1.2m (4ft) below Heel Stone, UK by Anonymous: The Great Architect of the Universe
http://www.perenco-uk.com/ --- PI...
5. Re: Questions in Parliament about the proposed short tunnel at Stonehenge by Anonymous: Global BP's
http://www.global-bp.com/ --- PING 97.99.225.68 (97.99.22...
20 most recent Comments Click here to see more. RSS Version of this feed
1. Re: Mishkan 1.2m (4ft) below Heel Stone, UK by GarryDenke
I am at Baby Dolls. Why you working?
http://www.babydolls.com/ IT IS DONE, G-D...
2. Re: Mishkan 1.2m (4ft) below Heel Stone, UK (we can see...) by GarryDenke Wallies of Stonehenge, thanks. "British Archaeologists could not find My Ark of My Covenant if they tripped over it." G-D Wallies of Wiltshire, thanks. G-D...
3. Mishkan 1.2m (4ft) below Heel Stone, UK (we can see...) by Anonymous
Mishkan 1.2m (4ft) below Heel Stone, UK (we can see...)...
4. Mishkan 1.2m (4ft) below Heel Stone, UK by Anonymous
The Great Architect of the Universe
http://www.perenco-uk.com/ --- PING 97.99.225.68 (97.99.225.68) 56 (84) bytes of data. --- 6...
5. Re: Questions in Parliament about the proposed short tunnel at Stonehenge by Anonymous
Global BP's
http://www.global-bp.com/ --- PING 97.99.225.68 (97.99.225.68) 56 (84) bytes of data. --- 64 bytes from 97.99.225.68:...
6. Are you enjoying your conversation with yourself Garry? (we can see...) by Andy B
Are you enjoying your conversation with yourself Garry? (we can see...) ...
7. Re: Questions in Parliament about the proposed short tunnel at Stonehenge by Anonymous
Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith...
8. Re: Minning Low by SteveKent
The ten year concessionary footpath was due to end on 31/01/17. After a few phone calls, I've discovered, from the Peak National Park, that they have renegotiated unending access to the site, in retu...
9. Re: Calverley Park by Anonymous
The place mentioned is The Calverley Grounds, not The Calverley Park. I lived at The Lodge, Calverley Grounds for 21 years and I understand these stones were situated to the rear of the Lodge. In a...
10. Are you enjoying your conversation with yourself Garry? (we can see...) by Andy B
Are you enjoying your conversation with yourself Garry? (we can see...) ...
11. Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge by GarryDenke
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2017-01-17a.828.0#g852.0 ...
12. Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge by GarryDenke
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2017-01-17a.828.0#g852.0 ...
13. Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge by Anonymous
Reading List for Andrew Jones, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport), who turned down Wally's £7+ billion Deposited within Banks. ...
14. Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge by Anonymous
Andrew Jones, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport), he turned down Wallies' £7+ Billion Deposited within Banks. ...
15. Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge by Anonymous
G. Willy Wally mate, The Archaeologists have Failed Stonehenge! Soon to be Destroyed because of Them! ...
16. Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge by GarryDenke
"7,000,000,000 people" Total Signatures (to date) 23,918 in UK 1,967 outside UK ---------------- 25,885 Signatures (total) of 7,000,000,000 pe...
17. Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge by Anonymous
That heavy stuff at the end I like. Oddball's wisdom is heavy stuff....
18. Re: Pulpit Hill by Anonymous
why is it called pulpit hill,any civil war history...
19. Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge by GarryDenke
Why don't you Dig how Beautiful it is out here? Why don't you say something Righteous and Hopeful for a change?
https://www.youtub...
20. Re: Stone of Morphie by Anonymous
I would call it Kincardineshire or the Mearns, rather than Aberdeenshire....
<< Sites under Threat Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge
Submitted by Andy B on Monday, 23 February 2015 Page Views: 3810 StonehengeCountry: England County: Wiltshire Type: Henge
Internal Links: Go to our Henge home pageGo to our Wiltshire home page
Image: Stonehenge Landscape-study area. submitted by Orpbit
Stonehenge Landscape-study area. Save Stonehenge World Heritage Site, no further damage should be done to the archaeological landscape of Stonehenge. Future generations would be appalled at those who decided that road widening should be at the expense of
England’s most iconic World Heritage Site.
If A303 widening at Stonehenge is felt to be essential it should be done by means of a deep bored tunnel at least 4.5km long. Anything shorter would cause irreparable damage to this landscape, and is in breach of the World Heritage Convention.
Why is this important?
The Government proposes to widen the A303 trunk road to the south west. This road crosses the iconic Stonehenge World Heritage Site (WHS), which has been called “the most archaeologically significant land surface in Europe”. The whole site, extending
to beyond the horizons around the famous stones themselves, is c. 5.4 km across. All of it makes up a “huge ancient complex” that holds many secrets yet to be discovered.
The proposal is to put the road into a tunnel where it passes the stones, but the tunnel would be at most only 2.9 km long. This would result in at least 1.6 km of above-ground 21st-century road engineering within the WHS, consisting of new dual
carriageway descending in massive trenches to the tunnel portals and possibly a new underpass with slip roads on the western WHS boundary.
All archaeology in the construction zones would be destroyed and the A303 would become the largest ever human intervention in an area fashioned and revered by over a hundred generations of our ancestors.
The whole Stonehenge landscape has an outstanding universal value that is of immense significance for all people for all time, and this transcends any consideration of sorting out a 21st century part-time traffic jam.
Click here for the petition for those living in the UK and here for everyone else.
National Trust members (and others) may like to contact the National Trust to ask why they have changed long-held beliefs about protecting the landscape around Stonehenge to allow the irreparable damage that a short tunnel would cause to the World
Heritage Site.
Note: the campaign is not connected with Richard 'Orpbit', whose illustration of the wider area around Stonehenge we used to illustrate the article (see comment below).
<< Shadikanni
Please add your thoughts on this site
Stonehenge: Celebration and Subversion
Stonehenge: Celebration and Subversion
Social Media
E-mail this article link to a friend email link
Auto-Translation (Google)
Translate from English into:
Translate
"Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge" | Login/Create an Account | 72 News and Comments
Refresh
Post Comment
Go back to top of page Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Tuesday, 17 January 2017
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaTYviSTSfk
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Tuesday, 17 January 2017
Nice video.
Here's what She said:
Stonehenge has roughly 1,000,000 visitors per year.
Earth's population is roughly 7,000,000,000 people.
Stonehenge Alliance has roughly 24,000 signatures.
24,000 against?
It's over.
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Tuesday, 17 January 2017
The Megalithic Portal has 19,059 registered members.
Only ten (10) have Posted here. What's that tell you?
It's over.
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 1) by GarryDenke on Tuesday, 17 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
Why don't you Dig how Beautiful it is out here?
Why don't you say something Righteous and Hopeful for a change?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqeG4h2H3JM
"Dig", Oddball
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Tuesday, 17 January 2017
That heavy stuff at the end I like.
Oddball's wisdom is heavy stuff.
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 1) by GarryDenke on Tuesday, 17 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
"7,000,000,000 people"
Total Signatures (to date)
23,918 in UK
1,967 outside UK
----------------
25,885 Signatures (total)
of
7,000,000,000 people
=
Short Tunnel
"Dig"
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Tuesday, 17 January 2017
G. Willy Wally mate,
The Archaeologists have Failed Stonehenge!
Soon to be Destroyed because of Them!
https://mikepitts.wordpress.com/2013/08/29/where-was-the-stonehenge-festival/
Wallies of Wessex save Stonehenge!
We need you Wallies of Wessex!
Sir Walter Wally
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Wednesday, 18 January 2017
Andrew Jones, Parliamentary Under-Secretary
(Department for Transport), he turned down
Wallies' £7+ Billion Deposited within Banks.
https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/stonehenge-tunnel-archaeology-chief-raises-concerns/10016430.article
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/whall/?id=2016-03-01c.273.0&u=3440#c34175
Not our Fault!
Mike Parker Pearson
Mike Heyworth
Mike Pitts
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 1) by GarryDenke on Wednesday, 18 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2017-01-17a.828.0#g852.0 https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2017-01-17a.852.0
"Wally's £7billion+ Deposited within Banks"
Are you kidding? Bibi offered £1T.
http://ijr.com/2015/03/262242-get-know-bibi/
We're negotiating Now.
"Dig", G-D
[ Reply to This ]
Are you enjoying your conversation with yourself Garry? (we can see...) (Score: 1)
by Andy B on Wednesday, 18 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
Are you enjoying your conversation with yourself Garry? (we can see...)
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 1) by Orpbit on Saturday, 14 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
I didn't know that the Megalithic Portal is a "billboard" for freemasonry.
[Admin note. It's most certainly not, offensive content has been removed]
The links provided don't relate to any information or publication regarding the tunnel proposal that I could find either directly or within a reasonable time of searching. In short a bloody waste of time.
As regards my image at the start of this subject, Andy would you please put an asterisk against my name so that it clearly links to the disclaimer at the end, which might also be emphasised by emboldening.
I know it's a prickly issue, but behaving like *****s is hardly good advertising for the Portal.
Cheers [Admin note. Requested emboldening done R.]
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Saturday, 14 January 2017
We got your Deal Done and you Complain?
IT IS DONE, 5.5 km (3.42 mi)
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 1) by Orpbit on Sunday, 15 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
i) I didn't ask you to speak on my behalf!
ii) Where's the plan showing the exact position of the tunnel and the two portals!
iii) and showing which of Options 1 or 2 has been agreed!
3.4 miles - Big Deal! Obviously there's an assessment to go with it including the trade offs with the official proposals, or just a Freemasonic whim because it's 5.5 km!
At this moment in time the evidence suggests that I've been involved in more EIA's and LVIA's, including major road schemes in consultation with the Highways Agency, than you've had hot dinners.
So to add to my previous comments all I've seen is a load of aurochs.
Bye bye.
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 1) by GarryDenke on Sunday, 15 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
Highways Agency? Where have you been?
It's crunch time, Ladies and Gentlemen.
Highways England, draft, Git 'r Done!
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/highways-agency https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/highways-england
Oy, oy. Richard, bye.
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 1) by Orpbit on Sunday, 15 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
Read what I said again:
"...I've BEEN involved..." - it was then "Highways Agency". I didn't say that I am involved currently - I fully retired before the change in name in 2015. There have been, equally, so many changes in name across the board of the many "agencies" I had
consultations with directly. When I make my comments, of course it will be addressed to Highways England.
So as far as direct involvement is concerned - on the ground - you've been nowhere!
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Sunday, 15 January 2017
30 years of Taxpayers money Wasted
Best wishes in Your retirement, Enjoy
https://twitter.com/HighwaysEngland
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Sunday, 15 January 2017
My Real Name is Offensive?
You kids are on your own.
The Deal is Off. Bye bye.
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 1) by Runemage on Sunday, 15 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
Could I please ask that no-one responds to inflammatory posts, both by named individuals and anonymous contributors.
Many Thanks, Rune.
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 1) by Orpbit on Sunday, 15 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
Thank you Rune for the emboldening. Mind - wouldn't it be better just to close this item. I had already pulled out of this nonsense having started with a perfectly serious post requesting explanation. Obviously the misinterpretation of my stating "Agency"
had to be corrected.
BTW, the original ***** was "Friar" as in Mendicant Friar. I think Gollum would have guessed instantly that it was meant as a riddle. These days people don't take the word of preachers, but seek educated argument. That opportunity wasn't taken. No more
to be said.
Cheers.
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Thursday, 12 January 2017
I did not Hear from you,
So plans Now final.
Stonehenge tunnel plans finalised by government
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-wiltshire-38589118
Chris Grayling gives go-ahead to road tunnel under Stonehenge
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jan/12/stonehenge-a303-tunnel-chris-grayling-world-heritage-site
Stonehenge tunnel given green light after nearly 30 years of delays
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/12/stonehenge-tunnel-given-green-light-nearly-30-years-delays/
[Offensive content removed. Admin]
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 1) by Orpbit on Thursday, 12 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
Would it be possible to expand a bit on these comments:
i) "My next action will be a surprise to all concerned." (Anonymous-14 November 2016) and
ii) your latest post, "I did not Hear from you, So plans Now final."
All very cryptic to me - in keeping with the "Anonymous" poster!
Also:
http://www.sarsen.org/
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Friday, 13 January 2017
Only hope Now at a Longer tunnel Yearlings: Also:
http://stonehengealliance.org.uk/ [Content edited. Admin]
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 1) by Orpbit on Saturday, 14 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
Everyone knows that it was moved to Ynysybwl!
http://www.megalithic.co.uk/modules.php?op=modload&name=Forum&file=viewtopic&topic=6250&forum=4&start=0
Except for one *****, apparently!
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Sunday, 15 January 2017
Ynysybwl's been cored; Nothing there.
Please define 'one *****,' Thank you.
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 1) by Runemage on Sunday, 15 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
Repeating myself...
Could I please ask that no-one responds to inflammatory posts, both by named individuals and anonymous contributors.
Many Thanks, Rune.
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Sunday, 15 January 2017
My Real Name is Offensive?
You kids are on your own.
The Deal is Off. Bye bye.
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 1) by GarryDenke on Monday, 16 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2017-01-12b.453.6&s=A303#g453.8 https://www.theyworkforyou.com/whall/?id=2016-03-01c.273.0&u=3440#c34175
Herewith invitation for you to Join our site
And post your Thoughts on this Quagmire
Welcome to the Conversation
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Please sign the petitions against the short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Monday, 16 January 2017
Get involved. Sign petitions. Ur help needed. Sign up today.
[ Reply to This ]
Short video by Tom Holland boosts Stonehenge tunnel campaign (Score: 1)
by Andy B on Tuesday, 15 November 2016
(User Info | Send a Message)
The Stonehenge Alliance write: Our campaign to stop further damage to the landscape of Stonehenge with a short tunnel has been given a fantastic boost by our supporter Tom Holland, historian, author and broadcaster. He urges viewers to support the
Stonehenge Alliance, saying
"Moving the A303 into a tunnel would be a catastrophe. An act of vandalism that would shame our country and our generation.”
The UK Government’s road building plans are at a pre-consultation stage but Highways England has written to Stonehenge Alliance saying that their working assumption is to build a 2.9 km (1.8 mile) tunnel.
The location of tunnel portals is not yet confirmed but the tunnel would lie within the World Heritage Site. This is the time to influence Government. Watch the video here
http://stonehengealliance.org.uk/short-video-created-for-campaign/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6u4grV5VlH8&feature=youtu.be
Can you encourage others to take action?
http://stonehengealliance.org.uk/our-campaign/petition/
Best wishes and many thanks for your support,
The Stonehenge Alliance
[ Reply to This ]
Viable alternative to a tunnel (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Monday, 14 November 2016
I sent Highways England a much cheaper alternative to a tunnel. They turned it down flat. My next action will be a surprise to all concerned.
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Viable alternative to a tunnel (Score: 1)
by Andy B on Tuesday, 15 November 2016
(User Info | Send a Message)
Pray do tell - preferably this time not with your phone number...
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Viable alternative to a tunnel (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Saturday, 14 January 2017
Knights Templar: Knight Grand Cross of the Temple
"The Pagan Tunnel" of Wilts: 5.5 km (3.42 mi)
http://www.ugle.org.uk/
http://www.pglwilts.org.uk/
IT IS DONE
Albert Frederick Arthur George Saxe-Coburg and Gotha
Supreme Council: 33º Ancient and Accepted Rite
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Viable alternative to a tunnel (Score: 1)
by GarryDenke on Saturday, 14 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
Complete Agreement
https://twitter.com/ugle_grandlodge
https://twitter.com/wiltspgl
https://twitter.com/stonehenge_6114
5.5 km (3.42 mi)
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Viable alternative to a tunnel (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Sunday, 15 January 2017
http://www.salisburyjournal.co.uk/news/15018379.A303_Stonehenge_tunnel_will_go_ahead__minister_confirms/
http://www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/news/15018425.A303__will_be_moved_into_tunnel_near_Stonehenge/
G, we still good? Al
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Viable alternative to a tunnel (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Sunday, 15 January 2017
Swampy, Billy, Walter, Mike, Pencil, Chico,
Fuzzy, Luke, Bobby, Fingers, & Buddy, Al
No worries. I've got this.
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Viable alternative to a tunnel (Score: 1)
by GarryDenke on Monday, 16 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
Nick the Trowel
(draughtsman)
[ Reply to This ]
Questions in Parliament about the proposed short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 1)
by Andy B on Monday, 28 September 2015
(User Info | Send a Message)
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb
Does the Government plan “to implement a tunnel for the A303 in order to avoid the entire surface area of the Stonehenge part of the World Heritage Site?”
Have they “sought, or been given, the advice of the National Committee of the International Council on Monuments and Sites concerning proposals for dualling the A303 through the Stonehenge part of the World Heritage Site; and if so, what advice have
they received?”
Do they intend “fully to honour Article 4 of the 1972 Convention Concerning the Protection of the World’s Heritage in respect of any future A303 dualling scheme at Stonehenge; and if not, whether they intend to withdraw as a signatory to the World
Heritage Convention?”
Not answered yet.
With thanks to
https://heritageaction.wordpress.com/2015/09/28/stonehenge-three-incisive-questions-in-parliament/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Questions in Parliament about the proposed short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 1)
by GarryDenke on Monday, 16 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2015-09-17.HL2379.h https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2015-09-17.HL2380.h
Baroness Neville-Rolfe
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills
This Government will continue to honour its obligations under article 4 of the World Heritage Convention regarding the Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site. We are committed to working with UNESCO and its advisory bodies to ensure that the
Outstanding Universal Value of the World Heritage Site is taken into consideration in any forthcoming road scheme. We will be closely monitoring the development of any such scheme as it progresses.
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2015-09-17.HL2384.h
Annotations
Garry Denke
King George VI Freemasonry
Complete Agreement
Traffic flows on the A303 between Amesbury and Winterbourne Stoke
(the section including Stonehenge) are above capacity of the road.
The Highways Agency has determined the A303 road unsafe.
https://twitter.com/ugle_grandlodge
https://twitter.com/wiltspgl
https://twitter.com/stonehenge_6114
Tunnel 5.5 km (3.42 mi)
IT IS DONE 33º
Great Architect of the Universe
--
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.archaeology/LZyumDzVQJw https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/uk.religion.pagan/PB10Q1ltuig https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.religion.druid/CbIKNK1wTOc https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.religion.wicca/PPnGgLoDMDs
Knights Templar: Knight Grand Cross of the Temple
"The Pagan Tunnel" of Wilts: 5.5 km (3.42 mi)
http://www.ugle.org.uk/
http://www.pglwilts.org.uk/
IT IS DONE 33º
Albert Frederick Arthur George Saxe-Coburg and Gotha
Supreme Council: 33º Ancient and Accepted Rite
--
http://www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/news/15018425.A303__will_be_moved_into_tunnel_near_Stonehenge/
http://www.salisburyjournal.co.uk/news/15018379.A303_Stonehenge_tunnel_will_go_ahead__minister_confirms/
Provincial Grand Lodge of Wiltshire voted FOR "The Pagan Tunnel"
5.5 km (3.42 mi), AGAINST "The Druid Tunnel", and AGAINST
"The Wiccan Tunnel". Complete Agreement by all Masons
http://www.pglwilts.org.uk/
IT IS DONE 33º
Howard Hughes
Roland Totera
--
http://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/are-there-really-plans-build-tunnel-under-stonehenge-007363
Read the rest of this post...
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Questions in Parliament about the proposed short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Monday, 16 January 2017
G,
She gonna Sign or is She gonna Spit in face?
Al
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Questions in Parliament about the proposed short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 1)
by GarryDenke on Monday, 16 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
My guess Is that She again Spat right in your face.
Al, that's what kids do. 'You're talking £7 bills, Eek'
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Questions in Parliament about the proposed short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Monday, 16 January 2017
£7bn? no way. £2.8bn, tops.
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Questions in Parliament about the proposed short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, 18 January 2017
Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith
https://www.theyworkforyou.com/royal/elizabeth_the_second
Offer not accepted. Yea, offer too low.
Ye, £24T, Al
[ Reply to This ]
Are you enjoying your conversation with yourself Garry? (we can see...) (Score: 1)
by Andy B on Wednesday, 18 January 2017
(User Info | Send a Message)
Are you enjoying your conversation with yourself Garry? (we can see...)
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Questions in Parliament about the proposed short tunnel at Stonehenge (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, 19 January 2017
Global BP's
http://www.global-bp.com/
--- PING 97.99.225.68 (97.99.225.68) 56 (84) bytes of data. ---
64 bytes from 97.99.225.68: icmp_seq=1 ttl=42 time=151 ms Swampy
64 bytes from 97.99.225.68: icmp_seq=2 ttl=42 time=142 ms Billy
64 bytes from 97.99.225.68: icmp_seq=3 ttl=42 time=143 ms Walter
64 bytes from 97.99.225.68: icmp_seq=4 ttl=42 time=144 ms Mike
64 bytes from 97.99.225.68: icmp_seq=1 ttl=42 time=151 ms Pencil
64 bytes from 97.99.225.68: icmp_seq=2 ttl=42 time=142 ms Chico
64 bytes from 97.99.225.68: icmp_seq=3 ttl=42 time=143 ms Fuzzy
64 bytes from 97.99.225.68: icmp_seq=4 ttl=42 time=144 ms Luke
64 bytes from 97.99.225.68: icmp_seq=1 ttl=42 time=151 ms Bobby
64 bytes from 97.99.225.68: icmp_seq=2 ttl=42 time=142 ms Fingers
64 bytes from 97.99.225.68: icmp_seq=3 ttl=42 time=143 ms Buddy
64 bytes from 97.99.225.68: icmp_seq=4 ttl=42 time=144 ms Al
& Nick the Trowel
Draftsman
[ Reply to This ]
Mishkan 1.2m (4ft) below Heel Stone, UK (we can see...) (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, 19 January 2017
Mishkan 1.2m (4
