• Bill Gates trying to block out the Sun?

    From Byker@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 29 14:48:49 2021
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.global-warming, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: can.politics

    Bill Gates has hit a snag in his plan to block out the sun using particulate matter. However, the sad fact is that that’s all this is: A SNAG. He’s determined to block out the sun, and that will be something that happens. We will live to see a darker world, where the atmosphere is filled with particulate matter, because that’s what Bill Gates wants. I assume everyone who reads this understands that global warming is a scam. You don’t have to be a scientist to understand this: Every single one of these models that they’ve produced has been wrong.

    They’ve been preaching doom for decades on end, and NOTHING has happened... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Sweden axes Bill Gates-funded Harvard experiment aiming to DIM THE SUN to
    fight climate change amid outcry from activists

    Sweden’s space agency has called off a geoengineering experiment to
    determine whether blotting out the sun with aerosols could reverse global warming. Funded by Bill Gates, the project stoked fierce opposition from eco groups.

    Proposed by researchers at Harvard University, the Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment, or SCoPEx, ultimately planned to release a cloud of calcium carbonate – more commonly known as chalk dust – into the atmosphere from a high-altitude balloon to study its effects on sunlight reaching
    Earth. The project proved too controversial, however, and on Wednesday the Swedish Space Corporation (SSC) said that a test flight set for June would
    not move forward.

    “The scientific community is divided regarding geoengineering, including any related technology tests such as the planned technical balloon test flight
    from Esrange this summer,” the SSC said in a statement on Wednesday.

    SSC has had dialogues this spring with both leading experts on
    geoengineering and with other stakeholders, as well as with the SCoPEx
    Advisory Board. As a result of these dialogues and in agreement with
    Harvard, SSC has decided not to conduct the technical test flight planned
    for this summer.

    Planned for the Arctic town of Kiruna, the June flight would have merely
    tested the balloon’s systems to pave the way for the study, but local activists have vocally opposed the initiative. In a joint letter penned last month, the Saami Council – which advocates for Sweden’s indigenous Saami people – and three environmental groups warned that the SCoPEx experiment could have “catastrophic consequences.”

    While SCoPEx’s website states the experiment would pose “no significant hazard to people or the environment” and would release only a small amount
    of particles into the air, the Saami Council has opposed solar
    geoengineering in concept, saying it “essentially attempts to mimic volcanic eruptions by continuously spewing the sky with sun-dimming particles.” The activist groups also argued that SCoPEx could distract from the goal of reducing carbon emissions and have “irreversible sociopolitical effects that could compromise the world’s necessary efforts to achieve zero-carbon societies.”

    The experiment has received backing from Harvard’s Solar Geoengineering Research Program, whose website names billionaire climate crusader Bill
    Gates among its private donors, though it does not specify his contribution. Previously, a lead researcher working on SCoPEx, David Keith of Harvard, separately received at least $4.6 million from Gates for his Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research (FICER), according to the Guardian. Founded in 2007, FICER also funds research into solar geoengineering.

    Asked at a 2010 TED talk about what “emergency measures” mankind could implement to fight climate change should all else fail, Gates suggested
    solar geoengineering could be an “insurance policy.”

    “There is a line of research on what's called geoengineering, which are various techniques that would delay the heating to buy us 20 or 30 years to
    get our act together. Now that's just an insurance policy, you hope that you don't need to do that,” he said, adding that the idea might be “kept in the back pocket.”

    Keith, a professor of applied physics at the Harvard School of Engineering
    and Applied Sciences, told Reuters the SSC’s decision to scrap the
    experiment was “a setback,” but noted that the project could move to the US if the troubles continue in Europe. Until then, the researchers say they
    will continue to lobby for SCoPEx in Sweden, hoping to generate public
    interest and support.

    The experiment could find traction in the States, as a report published last week by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine called
    on the government to devote between $100 million and $200 million to solar geoengineering projects, including technology to dim out the Sun, over the
    next five years.

    https://www.rt.com/news/519904-sweden-experiment-dim-sun-gates/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From danny burstein@21:1/5 to CheckBox on Sun May 30 04:55:21 2021
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.global-warming, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: can.politics

    In <c856bgllmm9k8emgj6d7sk3fl8gao7f40e@4ax.com> CheckBox <A251f1@krOrange.buzz> writes:

    On Sat, 29 May 2021 14:48:49 -0500, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:

    [snip]

    MORE expensive - actually ORBIT a dust cloud between
    earth and sun, an orbit a few million miles closer. Again
    it would only stay in position for a couple of years. The
    downside is that it is less precise, blocking heat over
    the whole planet rather than in strategically selected
    locations.

    Of course, if we could only locate the special code pre-fix
    to get the attention of Fred Hoyle's "Black Cloud"...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Cloud

    --
    _____________________________________________________
    Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
    dannyb@panix.com
    [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From CheckBox@21:1/5 to Byker on Sun May 30 00:39:34 2021
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.global-warming, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: can.politics

    On Sat, 29 May 2021 14:48:49 -0500, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:

    Bill Gates has hit a snag in his plan to block out the sun using particulate >matter. However, the sad fact is that thats all this is: A SNAG. Hes >determined to block out the sun, and that will be something that happens.

    a) That plan is NOT his - it's been around for decades.

    b) Properly done, it's a GOOD plan - and not TOO
    expensive either.

    747 cargo planes tweaked for high altitude could indeed
    deliver carefully-sized dust particles into the stratosphere,
    much like large volcanoes do, but with more precision.
    Done right, it WOULD block about ONE PERCENT of
    solar heat - for a year or two. Then the dust settles.

    That MIGHT be "long enough" to re-freeze the (ant)arctic.
    Impacts elsewhere would be almost unnoticable.

    MORE expensive - actually ORBIT a dust cloud between
    earth and sun, an orbit a few million miles closer. Again
    it would only stay in position for a couple of years. The
    downside is that it is less precise, blocking heat over
    the whole planet rather than in strategically selected
    locations.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From CheckBox@21:1/5 to dannyb@panix.com on Sun May 30 01:14:02 2021
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.global-warming, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: can.politics

    On Sun, 30 May 2021 04:55:21 +0000 (UTC), danny burstein
    <dannyb@panix.com> wrote:

    In <c856bgllmm9k8emgj6d7sk3fl8gao7f40e@4ax.com> CheckBox <A251f1@krOrange.buzz> writes:

    On Sat, 29 May 2021 14:48:49 -0500, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:

    [snip]

    MORE expensive - actually ORBIT a dust cloud between
    earth and sun, an orbit a few million miles closer. Again
    it would only stay in position for a couple of years. The
    downside is that it is less precise, blocking heat over
    the whole planet rather than in strategically selected
    locations.

    Of course, if we could only locate the special code pre-fix
    to get the attention of Fred Hoyle's "Black Cloud"...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Cloud

    Huh ??????

    In any case, "the cloud" would be anything but "black".
    You'd never notice it. The idea is to, briefly, block maybe
    ONE percent of solar IR, JUST enough to jam up the GW
    equation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Eric Stevens@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 30 23:08:43 2021
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.global-warming, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: can.politics

    On Sun, 30 May 2021 01:14:02 -0400, CheckBox <A251f1@krOrange.buzz>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 30 May 2021 04:55:21 +0000 (UTC), danny burstein
    <dannyb@panix.com> wrote:

    In <c856bgllmm9k8emgj6d7sk3fl8gao7f40e@4ax.com> CheckBox <A251f1@krOrange.buzz> writes:

    On Sat, 29 May 2021 14:48:49 -0500, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:

    [snip]

    MORE expensive - actually ORBIT a dust cloud between
    earth and sun, an orbit a few million miles closer. Again
    it would only stay in position for a couple of years. The
    downside is that it is less precise, blocking heat over
    the whole planet rather than in strategically selected
    locations.

    Of course, if we could only locate the special code pre-fix
    to get the attention of Fred Hoyle's "Black Cloud"...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Cloud

    Huh ??????

    In any case, "the cloud" would be anything but "black".
    You'd never notice it. The idea is to, briefly, block maybe
    ONE percent of solar IR, JUST enough to jam up the GW
    equation.

    Don't worry. It's jammed up already.
    --

    Regards,

    Eric Stevens

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Billy@21:1/5 to CheckBox on Sun May 30 13:09:03 2021
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.global-warming, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: can.politics

    CheckBox wrote

    On Sat, 29 May 2021 14:48:49 -0500, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:

    Bill Gates has hit a snag in his plan to block out the sun using >>particulate matter. However, the sad fact is that that's all this is: A >>SNAG. He's determined to block out the sun, and that will be something
    that happens.

    a) That plan is NOT his - it's been around for decades.

    b) Properly done, it's a GOOD plan - and not TOO
    expensive either.

    747 cargo planes tweaked for high altitude could indeed
    deliver carefully-sized dust particles into the stratosphere,
    much like large volcanoes do, but with more precision.
    Done right, it WOULD block about ONE PERCENT of
    solar heat - for a year or two. Then the dust settles.

    That MIGHT be "long enough" to re-freeze the (ant)arctic.
    Impacts elsewhere would be almost unnoticable.

    MORE expensive - actually ORBIT a dust cloud between
    earth and sun, an orbit a few million miles closer. Again
    it would only stay in position for a couple of years. The
    downside is that it is less precise, blocking heat over
    the whole planet rather than in strategically selected
    locations.




    Trump was injected with a Bill Gates Microchip! He doesn't want you to get
    it because he said THE VIRUS IS A DEMOCRAT HOAX.


    Donald and Melania Trump received Covid vaccine at the White House in January


    https://www.cnn.com/2021/03/01/politics/trump-melania-vaccinated-white- house/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Byker@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 30 16:28:17 2021
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.global-warming, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: can.politics

    On Sun, 30 May 2021 01:14:02 -0400, CheckBox <A251f1@krOrange.buzz>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 30 May 2021 04:55:21 +0000 (UTC), danny burstein
    <dannyb@panix.com> wrote:

    In <c856bgllmm9k8emgj6d7sk3fl8gao7f40e@4ax.com> CheckBox >><A251f1@krOrange.buzz> writes:

    On Sat, 29 May 2021 14:48:49 -0500, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:

    [snip]

    MORE expensive - actually ORBIT a dust cloud between
    earth and sun, an orbit a few million miles closer. Again
    it would only stay in position for a couple of years. The
    downside is that it is less precise, blocking heat over
    the whole planet rather than in strategically selected
    locations.

    Of course, if we could only locate the special code pre-fix
    to get the attention of Fred Hoyle's "Black Cloud"...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Cloud

    Huh ??????

    In any case, "the cloud" would be anything but "black".
    You'd never notice it. The idea is to, briefly, block maybe
    ONE percent of solar IR, JUST enough to jam up the GW
    equation.

    Strange, whenever I hear dimming-the-earth's-atmosphere proposals,
    I can't help but think of a certain movie: https://tinyurl.com/dvddmf8x

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)