"El Zero" wrote in message news:2403c24f3206ab482b8485f09b80d66c@dizum.com...
How long has El Niño existed?
Since the end of the last Ice Age. The Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas knew all about it long before the conquistadors arrived.
BTW, what were the carbon levels in 1876-78?: https://tinyurl.com/mtb32mtd
How long has El Nio existed?
Climate change has been here since before man even walked the earth.
Ask a Climate nut about the "Little Ice Age" and they start stammering.
Charlie Glock wrote:
Climate change has been here since before man even walked the earth.
Long before farming?
Ask a Climate nut about the "Little Ice Age" and they start stammering.
Yeah, people starved, but so what.
Charlie Glock wrote:
Climate change has been here since before man even walked the earth.
Long before farming?
Ask a Climate nut about the "Little Ice Age" and they start stammering.
Yeah, people starved, but so what.
On 7/2/2023 19:43, Sn!pe wrote:
Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
Charlie Glock wrote:
Climate change has been here since before man even walked the earth.
Long before farming?
Ask a Climate nut about the "Little Ice Age" and they start stammering. >>>Yeah, people starved, but so what.
The absurd thing is: given that much of climate change is a result of
the natural cycle of ice ages and interglacials, some people think that
by reducing anthropogenic CO2 production we can actually do anything
about reversing that change. We may as well be farting in a hurricane
for all the good it might do. Come back King Canute; all is forgiven!
IMO "Net Zero CO2" is futile; not much more than a cynical money-making
scheme for the benefit of our masters, and aren't they just coining it.
Sir, you seem to have a deep natural understanding of natural cycle. Are
you a genius professor at a major research university in the Department
of Natural Understanding of Natural Cycle? Are you, perhaps, the Chairperson of the Subdepartment of Super-Geniousing and Other Matters
of Concern?
On 2023-07-02, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:I don't vote for conservatives.
Charlie Glock wrote:
Climate change has been here since before man even walked the earth.
Long before farming?
Ask a Climate nut about the "Little Ice Age" and they start stammering.
Yeah, people starved, but so what.
U are beyond help.
So vote crazy Joe Biden.
Good luck with that.
Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
Charlie Glock wrote:
Climate change has been here since before man even walked the earth.
Long before farming?
Ask a Climate nut about the "Little Ice Age" and they start stammering.
Yeah, people starved, but so what.
The absurd thing is: given that much of climate change is a result of
the natural cycle of ice ages and interglacials, some people think that
by reducing anthropogenic CO2 production we can actually do anything
about reversing that change. We may as well be farting in a hurricane
for all the good it might do. Come back King Canute; all is forgiven!
IMO "Net Zero CO2" is futile; not much more than a cynical money-making scheme for the benefit of our masters, and aren't they just coining it.
Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
Charlie Glock wrote:
Climate change has been here since before man even walked the earth.
Long before farming?
Ask a Climate nut about the "Little Ice Age" and they start stammering.
Yeah, people starved, but so what.
The absurd thing is: given that much of climate change is a result of
the natural cycle of ice ages and interglacials, some people think that
by reducing anthropogenic CO2 production we can actually do anything
about reversing that change. We may as well be farting in a hurricane
for all the good it might do. Come back King Canute; all is forgiven!
IMO "Net Zero CO2" is futile; not much more than a cynical money-making scheme for the benefit of our masters, and aren't they just coining it.
Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
Charlie Glock wrote:
Climate change has been here since before man even walked the earth.
Long before farming?
Ask a Climate nut about the "Little Ice Age" and they start stammering.
Yeah, people starved, but so what.
The absurd thing is: given that much of climate change is a result of
the natural cycle of ice ages and interglacials, some people think that
by reducing anthropogenic CO2 production we can actually do anything
about reversing that change. We may as well be farting in a hurricane
for all the good it might do. Come back King Canute; all is forgiven!
IMO "Net Zero CO2" is futile; not much more than a cynical money-making scheme for the benefit of our masters, and aren't they just coining it.
Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
Charlie Glock wrote:
Climate change has been here since before man even walked the earth.
Long before farming?
Ask a Climate nut about the "Little Ice Age" and they start stammering.
Yeah, people starved, but so what.
The absurd thing is: given that much of climate change is a result of
the natural cycle of ice ages and interglacials, some people think that
by reducing anthropogenic CO2 production we can actually do anything
about reversing that change. We may as well be farting in a hurricane
for all the good it might do. Come back King Canute; all is forgiven!
IMO "Net Zero CO2" is futile; not much more than a cynical money-making >scheme for the benefit of our masters, and aren't they just coining it.
"El Zero" wrote in message >news:2403c24f3206ab482b8485f09b80d66c@dizum.com...
How long has El Nio existed?
Since the end of the last Ice Age. The Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas knew all >about it long before the conquistadors arrived.
BTW, what were the carbon levels in 1876-78?: https://tinyurl.com/mtb32mtd
Ask a Climate nut about the "Little Ice Age" and they start stammering. >Climate change has been here since before man even walked the earth.
It has far less to do with man and far more to do with the cycles of nature.
Charlie Glock
"To conquer a nation, first disarm it's citizens"
Adolf Hitler
x-no-archive: yes
On 7/2/2023 6:27 PM, mixed nuts wrote:
On 7/2/2023 19:43, Sn!pe wrote:
Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
Charlie Glock wrote:
Climate change has been here since before man even walked the
earth.
Long before farming?
Ask a Climate nut about the "Little Ice Age" and they start
stammering.
Yeah, people starved, but so what.
The absurd thing is: given that much of climate change is a
result of
the natural cycle of ice ages and interglacials, some people
think that
by reducing anthropogenic CO2 production we can actually do
anything
about reversing that change. We may as well be farting in a
hurricane
for all the good it might do. Come back King Canute; all is
forgiven!
IMO "Net Zero CO2" is futile; not much more than a cynical
money-making
scheme for the benefit of our masters, and aren't they just
coining it.
Sir, you seem to have a deep natural understanding of natural
cycle. Are you a genius professor at a major research university
in the Department of Natural Understanding of Natural Cycle?
Are you, perhaps, the Chairperson of the Subdepartment of
Super-Geniousing and Other Matters of Concern?
He's a Trump-voting Pentecostal speaking-in-tongues MAGA Nazi.
Scientifically deduced, of course. The poor schmuck, he doesn't
understand scientific socialism. It's all very scientific. Abolish!
IMO "Net Zero CO2" is futile; not much more than a cynical
money-making scheme for the benefit of our masters, and
aren't they just coining it.
Sir, you seem to have a deep natural understanding of natural
cycle. Are you a genius professor at a major research university
in the Department of Natural Understanding of Natural Cycle?
Are you, perhaps, the Chairperson of the Subdepartment of
Super-Geniousing and Other Matters of Concern?
He's a Trump-voting Pentecostal speaking-in-tongues MAGA Nazi. Scientifically deduced, of course. The poor schmuck, he doesn't
understand scientific socialism. It's all very scientific. Abolish!
Our most fervent idjt voters all live in England.
(California is made up of basins surrounded by hills and
mountains. Thanks to the cold water current of the Pacific, we get
frequent inversions over basins. Any smoke and air pollution gets
trapped in the air of basins, unable to rise through the inversion
and get blown away over the hills.)
Sn!pe wrote:
Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
Charlie Glock wrote:
Climate change has been here since before man even walked the earth.
Long before farming?
Ask a Climate nut about the "Little Ice Age" and they start stammering. >>Yeah, people starved, but so what.
The absurd thing is: given that much of climate change is a result of
Why gamble with famine? Reducing carbon dioxide has other
benefits, so why risk agriculture when we don't need to.
the natural cycle of ice ages and interglacials, some people think that
by reducing anthropogenic CO2 production we can actually do anything
Reducing carbon dioxide production will mean getting the US out of
endless middle east wars. I wouldn't mind telling KSA, Israel,
Iran, and the rest to bugger off, we don't want your oil, so
continue killing each other without us.
And going green reduces the amount of poison we dump in the air,
water, and soil.
about reversing that change. We may as well be farting in a hurricane
for all the good it might do. Come back King Canute; all is forgiven!
IMO "Net Zero CO2" is futile; not much more than a cynical money-making scheme for the benefit of our masters, and aren't they just coining it.
Going green is pushed in California to reduce the air pollution.
Even before the Spanish settled, California had smog problems from
Indian domestic fires. Reducing carbon dioxide reduces nitrogen
oxide and other pollutants that poison our children.
I really don't know or care about global warming. I want to stop
pretending it's a chore to send our young off to war. A big f**k
you to south asia, and stop killing our own people here.
(California is made up of basins surrounded by hills and
mountains. Thanks to the cold water current of the Pacific, we get
frequent inversions over basins. Any smoke and air pollution gets
trapped in the air of basins, unable to rise through the inversion
and get blown away over the hills.)
"El Zero" wrote in message >>news:2403c24f3206ab482b8485f09b80d66c@dizum.com...
How long has El Nio existed?
Since the end of the last Ice Age. The Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas knew all >>about it long before the conquistadors arrived.
BTW, what were the carbon levels in 1876-78?: https://tinyurl.com/mtb32mtd
So? What does El Nino, La Nina have to do with global warming?
"Governor Swill" wrote in message >news:bei4aihojcmv4kjteh2kokagv4lc5otn5c@4ax.com...
On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 17:26:17 -0500, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:
"El Zero" wrote in message >>>news:2403c24f3206ab482b8485f09b80d66c@dizum.com...So? What does El Nino, La Nina have to do with global warming?
How long has El Nio existed?
Since the end of the last Ice Age. The Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas knew all >>>about it long before the conquistadors arrived.
BTW, what were the carbon levels in 1876-78?: https://tinyurl.com/mtb32mtd >>
You'll have to ask the lamers, flamers, and forgers about that one...
Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
Sn!pe wrote:
Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
Charlie Glock wrote:
Climate change has been here since before man even walked the earth.
Long before farming?
Ask a Climate nut about the "Little Ice Age" and they start stammering. >> >>Yeah, people starved, but so what.
The absurd thing is: given that much of climate change is a result of
Why gamble with famine? Reducing carbon dioxide has other
benefits, so why risk agriculture when we don't need to.
the natural cycle of ice ages and interglacials, some people think that
by reducing anthropogenic CO2 production we can actually do anything
Reducing carbon dioxide production will mean getting the US out of
endless middle east wars. I wouldn't mind telling KSA, Israel,
Iran, and the rest to bugger off, we don't want your oil, so
continue killing each other without us.
And going green reduces the amount of poison we dump in the air,
water, and soil.
about reversing that change. We may as well be farting in a hurricane
for all the good it might do. Come back King Canute; all is forgiven!
IMO "Net Zero CO2" is futile; not much more than a cynical money-making
scheme for the benefit of our masters, and aren't they just coining it.
Going green is pushed in California to reduce the air pollution.
Even before the Spanish settled, California had smog problems from
Indian domestic fires. Reducing carbon dioxide reduces nitrogen
oxide and other pollutants that poison our children.
I really don't know or care about global warming. I want to stop
pretending it's a chore to send our young off to war. A big f**k
you to south asia, and stop killing our own people here.
(California is made up of basins surrounded by hills and
mountains. Thanks to the cold water current of the Pacific, we get
frequent inversions over basins. Any smoke and air pollution gets
trapped in the air of basins, unable to rise through the inversion
and get blown away over the hills.)
That's a lot of conflation going on there. By all means have those
worthy aims but it obscures the debate to lump it all in together.
That's a lot of conflation going on there. By all means have those
worthy aims but it obscures the debate to lump it all in together.
She was explaining that California's green push has less to do with
Climate Change and more to do with local pollution. It's been that
way since the 1960s.
Charlie Glock wrote:
On 2023-07-02, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:I don't vote for conservatives.
Charlie Glock wrote:
Climate change has been here since before man even walked the earth.
Long before farming?
Ask a Climate nut about the "Little Ice Age" and they start stammering. >>>Yeah, people starved, but so what.
U are beyond help.
So vote crazy Joe Biden.
Good luck with that.
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.O / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed
On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 18:05:02 -0500, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:
"Governor Swill" wrote in message >>news:bei4aihojcmv4kjteh2kokagv4lc5otn5c@4ax.com...
On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 17:26:17 -0500, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:
"El Zero" wrote in message >>>>news:2403c24f3206ab482b8485f09b80d66c@dizum.com...
How long has El Nio existed?
Since the end of the last Ice Age. The Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas knew >>>>all
about it long before the conquistadors arrived.
BTW, what were the carbon levels in 1876-78?: >>>>https://tinyurl.com/mtb32mtd
So? What does El Nino, La Nina have to do with global warming?
You'll have to ask the lamers, flamers, and forgers about that one...
And since they haven't answered . . .
Swill
--
Welcome to reality. Enjoy your visit!
Heroyam slava! Glory to the Heroes!
Slva Ukrajni! Glory to Ukraine! Putin is a condom!
Ask a Climate nut about the "Little Ice Age" and they start stammering.
On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 18:25:55 -0700, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
(California is made up of basins surrounded by hills and
mountains. Thanks to the cold water current of the Pacific, we get
frequent inversions over basins. Any smoke and air pollution gets
trapped in the air of basins, unable to rise through the inversion
and get blown away over the hills.)
This is why geography really is relevant. It also explains why the kids who ignored geography in school grew up to become Republicans.
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
[Sn!pe]
That's a lot of conflation going on there. By all means have those
worthy aims but it obscures the debate to lump it all in together.
She was explaining that California's green push has less to do with
Climate Change and more to do with local pollution. It's been that
way since the 1960s.
Of course, but that is hijacking the thread and taking it into other
topics. The subject is El Niño and its effect (or otherwise) on
"Global Warming". I can't imagine that Siri really intended to
perpetrate a "But What About".
On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 19:22:53 +0100, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
Sn!pe wrote:
Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
Charlie Glock wrote:
Climate change has been here since before man even walked the earth. >>>>>Long before farming?
Ask a Climate nut about the "Little Ice Age" and they start stammering. >>>>>Yeah, people starved, but so what.
The absurd thing is: given that much of climate change is a result of
Why gamble with famine? Reducing carbon dioxide has other
benefits, so why risk agriculture when we don't need to.
the natural cycle of ice ages and interglacials, some people think that >>>> by reducing anthropogenic CO2 production we can actually do anything
Reducing carbon dioxide production will mean getting the US out of
endless middle east wars. I wouldn't mind telling KSA, Israel,
Iran, and the rest to bugger off, we don't want your oil, so
continue killing each other without us.
And going green reduces the amount of poison we dump in the air,
water, and soil.
about reversing that change. We may as well be farting in a hurricane >>>> for all the good it might do. Come back King Canute; all is forgiven! >>>>Going green is pushed in California to reduce the air pollution.
IMO "Net Zero CO2" is futile; not much more than a cynical money-making >>>> scheme for the benefit of our masters, and aren't they just coining it. >>>
Even before the Spanish settled, California had smog problems from
Indian domestic fires. Reducing carbon dioxide reduces nitrogen
oxide and other pollutants that poison our children.
I really don't know or care about global warming. I want to stop
pretending it's a chore to send our young off to war. A big f**k
you to south asia, and stop killing our own people here.
(California is made up of basins surrounded by hills and
mountains. Thanks to the cold water current of the Pacific, we get
frequent inversions over basins. Any smoke and air pollution gets
trapped in the air of basins, unable to rise through the inversion
and get blown away over the hills.)
That's a lot of conflation going on there. By all means have those
worthy aims but it obscures the debate to lump it all in together.
She was explaining that California's green push has less to do with Climate Change and
more to do with local pollution. It's been that way since the 1960s.
Sn!pe wrote:
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
[Sn!pe]
That's a lot of conflation going on there. By all means have those
worthy aims but it obscures the debate to lump it all in together.
She was explaining that California's green push has less to do with
Climate Change and more to do with local pollution. It's been that
way since the 1960s.
Of course, but that is hijacking the thread and taking it into other topics. The subject is El Niño and its effect (or otherwise) on
"Global Warming". I can't imagine that Siri really intended to
perpetrate a "But What About".
California is also the principal victim of El Nino. Because we
have basins surrounded hills which often have clay layers, we get
lots of slides and floods.
Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
Sn!pe wrote:
Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
[Sn!pe]
That's a lot of conflation going on there. By all means have those
worthy aims but it obscures the debate to lump it all in together.
She was explaining that California's green push has less to do with
Climate Change and more to do with local pollution. It's been that
way since the 1960s.
Of course, but that is hijacking the thread and taking it into other
topics. The subject is El Nio and its effect (or otherwise) on
"Global Warming". I can't imagine that Siri really intended to
perpetrate a "But What About".
California is also the principal victim of El Nino. Because we
have basins surrounded hills which often have clay layers, we get
lots of slides and floods.
That's a very US and California-centric view.
That's a very US and California-centric view.
NOAA says: "El Niño and La Niña are climate patterns
in the Pacific Ocean that can affect weather worldwide."
On Mon, 3 Jul 2023 00:43:28 +0100, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
Charlie Glock wrote:
Climate change has been here since before man even walked the earth.
Long before farming?
Ask a Climate nut about the "Little Ice Age" and they start stammering. >>>Yeah, people starved, but so what.
The absurd thing is: given that much of climate change is a result of
the natural cycle of ice ages and interglacials, some people think that
by reducing anthropogenic CO2 production we can actually do anything
about reversing that change. We may as well be farting in a hurricane
for all the good it might do. Come back King Canute; all is forgiven!
IMO "Net Zero CO2" is futile; not much more than a cynical money-making >>scheme for the benefit of our masters, and aren't they just coining it.
Where did you get your degree in climate science?
Swill
On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 17:26:17 -0500, "Byker" <byker@do~rag.net> wrote:
"El Zero" wrote in message >>news:2403c24f3206ab482b8485f09b80d66c@dizum.com...
How long has El Nio existed?
Since the end of the last Ice Age. The Aztecs, Mayans, and Incas knew all >>about it long before the conquistadors arrived.
BTW, what were the carbon levels in 1876-78?: https://tinyurl.com/mtb32mtd
So? What does El Nino, La Nina have to do with global warming?
Swill
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 107:15:42 |
| Calls: | 6,700 |
| Files: | 12,232 |
| Messages: | 5,348,345 |