Denmark’s Orsted said it would “reuse, recycle, or recover” all turbine
blades in its worldwide portfolio of wind farms once they’re
decommissioned.
We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simply amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing
world.
"JTEM is Remarkably Flexible" wrote in message news:bf737873-5a9e-494b-95e7-8267d254e8f7n@googlegroups.com...
Blithering idiot, as dishonest as the day is long, Unum wrote:
Denmark’s Orsted said it would “reuse, recycle, or recover” all turbine
blades in its worldwide portfolio of wind farms once they’re
decommissioned.
We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which
simply
amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing
world.
If even that far:
"A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can’t just be hauled away. First, you need to saw through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The municipal landfill in Casper, Wyoming, is the final resting place of 870 blades whose days making renewable energy have come to end. The severed fragments look like bleached whale bones nestled against one another.": https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2020-02-05/wind-turbine-blades-can-t-be-recycled-so-they-re-piling-up-in-landfills
Out-of-sight, out-of-mind: https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/2021/07/07/state-company-illegally-storing-hundreds-of-old-wind-turbine-blades-at-three-iowa-sites/
Texas turbine tsunami: https://www.texasobserver.org/what-to-do-with-a-tidal-wave-of-texas-wind-turbine-blades/
We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simply >> amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing
world.
If even that far:
"A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can’t just be hauled away. First, you need to saw through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The
On 9/8/2021 11:41 AM, Byker wrote:
We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simply >>> amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing
world.
If even that far:
"A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can’t just be hauled away. First, you need to saw >> through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to >> create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The
Dumbass didn't bother to read the OP? None of that is required.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/wind-energy-giant-siemens-gamesa-claims-world-first-in-blade-recycling.html
In a statement, the Spanish-German engineering group claimed its >RecyclableBlades were “the world’s first recyclable wind turbine blades ready
for commercial use offshore.”
Siemens Gamesa said it would work with German utility RWE to install and pilot >the blades at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in the German North Sea, which is >expected to commence commercial operations in 2022.
According to Siemens Gamesa, its recyclable blades use a new type of resin >which “makes it possible to efficiently separate the resin from the other >components at end of the blade’s working life.”
The business said this process, which it described as “mild,” protected “the--
properties of the materials in the blade, in contrast to other existing ways >of recycling conventional wind turbine blades. The materials can then be >reused in new applications after separation.”
Denmark’s Orsted said it would “reuse, recycle, or recover” all turbine blades
in its worldwide portfolio of wind farms once they’re decommissioned.
The same month saw General Electric’s renewables unit and cement manufacturer
Holcim strike a deal to explore the recycling of wind turbine blades.
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:41:47 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/8/2021 11:41 AM, Byker wrote:
Dumbass didn't bother to read the OP? None of that is required.We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simply >>>> amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing
world.
If even that far:
"A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can’t just be hauled away. First, you need to saw >>> through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to >>> create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The >>
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/wind-energy-giant-siemens-gamesa-claims-world-first-in-blade-recycling.html
In a statement, the Spanish-German engineering group claimed its
RecyclableBlades were “the world’s first recyclable wind turbine blades ready
for commercial use offshore.”
Siemens Gamesa said it would work with German utility RWE to install and pilot
the blades at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in the German North Sea, which is
expected to commence commercial operations in 2022.
According to Siemens Gamesa, its recyclable blades use a new type of resin >> which “makes it possible to efficiently separate the resin from the other >> components at end of the blade’s working life.”
"Other components" which mainly are the glass fibres. That is from one
36 ton blade they get abou 18 tons of resin which, hopefully, is
recyclable and 18 tons of contaminated glass fibres which will be of
little use to anybody.
Those blades are not fully recyclable.
On 9/10/2021 4:19 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:41:47 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>According to some uninformed guy on the internet?
wrote:
On 9/8/2021 11:41 AM, Byker wrote:"Other components" which mainly are the glass fibres. That is from one
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/wind-energy-giant-siemens-gamesa-claims-world-first-in-blade-recycling.htmlWe've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simplyIf even that far:
amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing >>>>> world.
"A wind turbine's blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can't just be hauled away. First, you need to saw >>>> through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to >>>> create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The >>> Dumbass didn't bother to read the OP? None of that is required.
In a statement, the Spanish-German engineering group claimed its
RecyclableBlades were "the world's first recyclable wind turbine blades ready
for commercial use offshore."
Siemens Gamesa said it would work with German utility RWE to install and pilot
the blades at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in the German North Sea, which is
expected to commence commercial operations in 2022.
According to Siemens Gamesa, its recyclable blades use a new type of resin >>> which "makes it possible to efficiently separate the resin from the other >>> components at end of the blade's working life."
36 ton blade they get abou 18 tons of resin which, hopefully, is
recyclable and 18 tons of contaminated glass fibres which will be of
little use to anybody.
Those blades are not fully recyclable.
"The materials can then be reused in new applications after separation"
On 9/10/2021 4:19 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:41:47 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/8/2021 11:41 AM, Byker wrote:
Dumbass didn't bother to read the OP? None of that is required.We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simply
amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing >>>>> world.
If even that far:
"A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can’t just be hauled away. First, you need to saw >>>> through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to >>>> create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The >>>
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/wind-energy-giant-siemens-gamesa-claims-world-first-in-blade-recycling.html
In a statement, the Spanish-German engineering group claimed its
RecyclableBlades were “the world’s first recyclable wind turbine blades ready
for commercial use offshore.”
Siemens Gamesa said it would work with German utility RWE to install and pilot
the blades at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in the German North Sea, which is
expected to commence commercial operations in 2022.
According to Siemens Gamesa, its recyclable blades use a new type of resin >>> which “makes it possible to efficiently separate the resin from the other >>> components at end of the blade’s working life.”
"Other components" which mainly are the glass fibres. That is from one
36 ton blade they get abou 18 tons of resin which, hopefully, is
recyclable and 18 tons of contaminated glass fibres which will be of
little use to anybody.
Those blades are not fully recyclable.
According to some uninformed guy on the internet?
"The materials can then be reused in new applications after separation"
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:38:49 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/10/2021 4:19 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:41:47 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/8/2021 11:41 AM, Byker wrote:
Dumbass didn't bother to read the OP? None of that is required.We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simply
amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing >>>>>> world.
If even that far:
"A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can’t just be hauled away. First, you need to saw
through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to
create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The >>>>
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/wind-energy-giant-siemens-gamesa-claims-world-first-in-blade-recycling.html
In a statement, the Spanish-German engineering group claimed its
RecyclableBlades were “the world’s first recyclable wind turbine blades ready
for commercial use offshore.”
Siemens Gamesa said it would work with German utility RWE to install and pilot
the blades at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in the German North Sea, which is
expected to commence commercial operations in 2022.
According to Siemens Gamesa, its recyclable blades use a new type of resin >>>> which “makes it possible to efficiently separate the resin from the other
components at end of the blade’s working life.”
"Other components" which mainly are the glass fibres. That is from one
36 ton blade they get abou 18 tons of resin which, hopefully, is
recyclable and 18 tons of contaminated glass fibres which will be of
little use to anybody.
Those blades are not fully recyclable.
According to some uninformed guy on the internet?
"The materials can then be reused in new applications after separation"
I'm a professional engineer and I worked with 'fibre glass' pressure
vessels and heavy transport equipment.
They blithely say "The materials can then be reused in new
applications after separation" without giving any indication of how
this might be done, what it will all cost, and what applications may
be able to make use of the materials afterwards.
On 9/11/2021 4:37 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:38:49 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/10/2021 4:19 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:I'm a professional engineer and I worked with 'fibre glass' pressure
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:41:47 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>According to some uninformed guy on the internet?
wrote:
On 9/8/2021 11:41 AM, Byker wrote:"Other components" which mainly are the glass fibres. That is from one >>>> 36 ton blade they get abou 18 tons of resin which, hopefully, is
Dumbass didn't bother to read the OP? None of that is required.We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simplyIf even that far:
amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing >>>>>>> world.
"A wind turbine's blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can't just be hauled away. First, you need to saw >>>>>> through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to
create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/wind-energy-giant-siemens-gamesa-claims-world-first-in-blade-recycling.html
In a statement, the Spanish-German engineering group claimed its
RecyclableBlades were "the world's first recyclable wind turbine blades ready
for commercial use offshore."
Siemens Gamesa said it would work with German utility RWE to install and pilot
the blades at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in the German North Sea, which is
expected to commence commercial operations in 2022.
According to Siemens Gamesa, its recyclable blades use a new type of resin
which "makes it possible to efficiently separate the resin from the other >>>>> components at end of the blade's working life."
recyclable and 18 tons of contaminated glass fibres which will be of
little use to anybody.
Those blades are not fully recyclable.
"The materials can then be reused in new applications after separation"
vessels and heavy transport equipment.So you don't really know, but you already decided they "are not fully recyclable". https://www.siemensgamesa.com/-/media/siemensgamesa/downloads/en/sustainability/environment/siemens-gamesa-20210901-recycableblade-infographic-finalen.pdf
They blithely say "The materials can then be reused in new
applications after separation" without giving any indication of how
this might be done, what it will all cost, and what applications may
be able to make use of the materials afterwards.
"The materials are now ready to be used in new products matching the technical
properties of the materials, ie. in the automotive industry, or in consumer goods like flight cases and flatscreen casings."
On 9/11/2021 4:37 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:38:49 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/10/2021 4:19 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:41:47 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/8/2021 11:41 AM, Byker wrote:
We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simply
amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing >>>>>>> world.
If even that far:
"A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can’t just be hauled away. First, you need to saw
through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to
create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The
Dumbass didn't bother to read the OP? None of that is required.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/wind-energy-giant-siemens-gamesa-claims-world-first-in-blade-recycling.html
In a statement, the Spanish-German engineering group claimed its
RecyclableBlades were “the world’s first recyclable wind turbine blades ready
for commercial use offshore.”
Siemens Gamesa said it would work with German utility RWE to install and pilot
the blades at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in the German North Sea, which is
expected to commence commercial operations in 2022.
According to Siemens Gamesa, its recyclable blades use a new type of resin
which “makes it possible to efficiently separate the resin from the other
components at end of the blade’s working life.”
"Other components" which mainly are the glass fibres. That is from one >>>> 36 ton blade they get abou 18 tons of resin which, hopefully, is
recyclable and 18 tons of contaminated glass fibres which will be of
little use to anybody.
Those blades are not fully recyclable.
According to some uninformed guy on the internet?
"The materials can then be reused in new applications after separation"
I'm a professional engineer and I worked with 'fibre glass' pressure
vessels and heavy transport equipment.
They blithely say "The materials can then be reused in new
applications after separation" without giving any indication of how
this might be done, what it will all cost, and what applications may
be able to make use of the materials afterwards.
So you don't really know, but you already decided they "are not fully >recyclable".
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/-/media/siemensgamesa/downloads/en/sustainability/environment/siemens-gamesa-20210901-recycableblade-infographic-finalen.pdf
"The materials are now ready to be used in new products matching the technical >properties of the materials, ie. in the automotive industry, or in consumer >goods like flight cases and flatscreen casings."
In alt.global-warming Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> wrote:
On 9/11/2021 4:37 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:38:49 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/10/2021 4:19 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:41:47 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>According to some uninformed guy on the internet?
wrote:
On 9/8/2021 11:41 AM, Byker wrote:"Other components" which mainly are the glass fibres. That is from one >>>>> 36 ton blade they get abou 18 tons of resin which, hopefully, is
Dumbass didn't bother to read the OP? None of that is required.We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simplyIf even that far:
amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing >>>>>>>> world.
"A wind turbine's blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can't just be hauled away. First, you need to saw
through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to
create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/wind-energy-giant-siemens-gamesa-claims-world-first-in-blade-recycling.html
In a statement, the Spanish-German engineering group claimed its
RecyclableBlades were "the world's first recyclable wind turbine blades ready
for commercial use offshore."
Siemens Gamesa said it would work with German utility RWE to install and pilot
the blades at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in the German North Sea, which is
expected to commence commercial operations in 2022.
According to Siemens Gamesa, its recyclable blades use a new type of resin
which "makes it possible to efficiently separate the resin from the other
components at end of the blade's working life."
recyclable and 18 tons of contaminated glass fibres which will be of >>>>> little use to anybody.
Those blades are not fully recyclable.
"The materials can then be reused in new applications after separation" >>> I'm a professional engineer and I worked with 'fibre glass' pressure
A qualified civil engineer I think. I did hear about a court case
where you claimed to be a crankshaft expert but it didnt seem to
work out so well.
--vessels and heavy transport equipment.So you don't really know, but you already decided they "are not fully
They blithely say "The materials can then be reused in new
applications after separation" without giving any indication of how
this might be done, what it will all cost, and what applications may
be able to make use of the materials afterwards.
recyclable".
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/-/media/siemensgamesa/downloads/en/sustainability/environment/siemens-gamesa-20210901-recycableblade-infographic-finalen.pdf
"The materials are now ready to be used in new products matching the technical
properties of the materials, ie. in the automotive industry, or in consumer >> goods like flight cases and flatscreen casings."
As posted above the key part of the tech is the new resin.
The difficulty (not impossibility) of recycling fibreglass in the past
has been separating the glass from the resin and the toxicity of the resin. >If the stuff is designed explicitly to overcome these problems then
we assume it's now easy to divert the glass component into traditional
glass reuse streams including of course making more fibreglass --
something that has been done before but was expensive.
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:38:49 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/10/2021 4:19 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:I'm a professional engineer and I worked with 'fibre glass' pressure
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:41:47 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>According to some uninformed guy on the internet?
wrote:
On 9/8/2021 11:41 AM, Byker wrote:"Other components" which mainly are the glass fibres. That is from one
We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simplyIf even that far:
amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing >>>>>> world.
"A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can’t just be hauled away. First, you need to saw
through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to
create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The >>>> Dumbass didn't bother to read the OP? None of that is required.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/wind-energy-giant-siemens-gamesa-claims-world-first-in-blade-recycling.html
In a statement, the Spanish-German engineering group claimed its
RecyclableBlades were “the world’s first recyclable wind turbine blades ready
for commercial use offshore.”
Siemens Gamesa said it would work with German utility RWE to install and pilot
the blades at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in the German North Sea, which is
expected to commence commercial operations in 2022.
According to Siemens Gamesa, its recyclable blades use a new type of resin >>>> which “makes it possible to efficiently separate the resin from the other
components at end of the blade’s working life.”
36 ton blade they get abou 18 tons of resin which, hopefully, is
recyclable and 18 tons of contaminated glass fibres which will be of
little use to anybody.
Those blades are not fully recyclable.
"The materials can then be reused in new applications after separation"
vessels and heavy transport equipment.
They blithely say "The materials can then be reused in new
applications after separation" without giving any indication of how
this might be done, what it will all cost, and what applications may
be able to make use of the materials afterwards.
On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 12:55:51 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/11/2021 4:37 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:So you believe everything you are told until you find out it is wrong?
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:38:49 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>So you don't really know, but you already decided they "are not fully
wrote:
On 9/10/2021 4:19 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:vessels and heavy transport equipment.
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:41:47 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>According to some uninformed guy on the internet?
wrote:
On 9/8/2021 11:41 AM, Byker wrote:"Other components" which mainly are the glass fibres. That is from one >>>>> 36 ton blade they get abou 18 tons of resin which, hopefully, is
Dumbass didn't bother to read the OP? None of that is required.We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simplyIf even that far:
amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing >>>>>>>> world.
"A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can’t just be hauled away. First, you need to saw
through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to
create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/wind-energy-giant-siemens-gamesa-claims-world-first-in-blade-recycling.html
In a statement, the Spanish-German engineering group claimed its
RecyclableBlades were “the world’s first recyclable wind turbine blades ready
for commercial use offshore.”
Siemens Gamesa said it would work with German utility RWE to install and pilot
the blades at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in the German North Sea, which is
expected to commence commercial operations in 2022.
According to Siemens Gamesa, its recyclable blades use a new type of resin
which “makes it possible to efficiently separate the resin from the other
components at end of the blade’s working life.”
recyclable and 18 tons of contaminated glass fibres which will be of >>>>> little use to anybody.
Those blades are not fully recyclable.
"The materials can then be reused in new applications after separation" >>> I'm a professional engineer and I worked with 'fibre glass' pressure
They blithely say "The materials can then be reused in new
applications after separation" without giving any indication of how
this might be done, what it will all cost, and what applications may
be able to make use of the materials afterwards.
recyclable".
Fibres (glass, carbon, kevlar or other material) need to be long and
clean if they are going to be used for structural purposes. Most of
them are hopefully in that condition when they go into a structure but
I don't see how they can be stripped from their resin without physical
damage or leaving residue of the resin on the fibres.
Nor can I think
of a use for fibres in this condition. The original news item gave no
clue about how these problems would be handled. It is for this reason
that I have no confidence in their claim that "The materials can then
be reused in new applications after separation".
The resin is another matter. It's astonishing what chemistry can do if
one puts enough energy into the process.
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/-/media/siemensgamesa/downloads/en/sustainability/environment/siemens-gamesa-20210901-recycableblade-infographic-finalen.pdfThat's new information, new claims and no more specific than the
"The materials are now ready to be used in new products matching the technical
properties of the materials, ie. in the automotive industry, or in consumer >> goods like flight cases and flatscreen casings."
first. I will be interested to see how soggy wood and PET foam
(previously soaked in a mild acid solution) will be recycled. I
suspect the required "new products matching the technical properties
of the materials, ie. in the automotive industry, or in consumer goods
like flight cases and flat screen casings" are the product of the airy
wave of a hand.
Assuming that such products can be found, I leave you to think of the problems entailed in matching the variable rate of supply of recycled
wind turbine materials to the need for a constant supply of materials
needed by a manufacturing industry.
Eric Stevens wrote on 9/11/2021 8:57 PM:...
Fibres (glass, carbon, kevlar or other material) need to be long and
clean if they are going to be used for structural purposes. Most of
them are hopefully in that condition when they go into a structure but
I don't see how they can be stripped from their resin without physical
damage or leaving residue of the resin on the fibres.
You apparently have a one-track mine. I don't think you can be a good engineer. A good engineer has be inventive in applying scientific
knowledge to solve problems.
Fiberglass is spun from molten glass. You melt the old fiberglass to
make new fiberglass. Nobody re-uses old fiberglass by cleaning it.
Use adhesive-remover or paint-thinner to soak the epoxy-fiberglass. The
epoxy will soften up. Put the blob into a hydraulic press to squeeze out
the epoxy gloop. Melt the remaining fiberglass mess in a furnace to get
back molten glass.
The epoxy gloop can be injected under high temperature and heat into
molds to form hockey pucks, bowling balls, etc.
On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 12:55:51 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/11/2021 4:37 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:38:49 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/10/2021 4:19 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:I'm a professional engineer and I worked with 'fibre glass' pressure
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:41:47 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/8/2021 11:41 AM, Byker wrote:
We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simply
amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing >>>>>>>> world.
If even that far:
"A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can’t just be hauled away. First, you need to saw
through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to
create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The
Dumbass didn't bother to read the OP? None of that is required.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/wind-energy-giant-siemens-gamesa-claims-world-first-in-blade-recycling.html
In a statement, the Spanish-German engineering group claimed its
RecyclableBlades were “the world’s first recyclable wind turbine blades ready
for commercial use offshore.”
Siemens Gamesa said it would work with German utility RWE to install and pilot
the blades at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in the German North Sea, which is
expected to commence commercial operations in 2022.
According to Siemens Gamesa, its recyclable blades use a new type of resin
which “makes it possible to efficiently separate the resin from the other
components at end of the blade’s working life.”
"Other components" which mainly are the glass fibres. That is from one >>>>> 36 ton blade they get abou 18 tons of resin which, hopefully, is
recyclable and 18 tons of contaminated glass fibres which will be of >>>>> little use to anybody.
Those blades are not fully recyclable.
According to some uninformed guy on the internet?
"The materials can then be reused in new applications after separation" >>>
vessels and heavy transport equipment.
They blithely say "The materials can then be reused in new
applications after separation" without giving any indication of how
this might be done, what it will all cost, and what applications may
be able to make use of the materials afterwards.
So you don't really know, but you already decided they "are not fully
recyclable".
So you believe everything you are told until you find out it is wrong?
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/-/media/siemensgamesa/downloads/en/sustainability/environment/siemens-gamesa-20210901-recycableblade-infographic-finalen.pdf
"The materials are now ready to be used in new products matching the technical
properties of the materials, ie. in the automotive industry, or in consumer >> goods like flight cases and flatscreen casings."
That's new information, new claims and no more specific than the
first. I will be interested to see how soggy wood and PET foam
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:38:49 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
On 9/10/2021 4:19 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:41:47 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
On 9/8/2021 11:41 AM, Byker wrote:
Dumbass didn't bother to read the OP? None of that is required.We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simply
amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing >>>>>> world.
If even that far:
"A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can’t just be hauled away. First, you need to saw
through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to
create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The >>>>
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/wind-energy-giant-siemens-gamesa-claims-world-first-in-blade-recycling.html
In a statement, the Spanish-German engineering group claimed its
RecyclableBlades were “the world’s first recyclable wind turbine blades ready
for commercial use offshore.”
Siemens Gamesa said it would work with German utility RWE to install and pilot
the blades at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in the German North Sea, which is
expected to commence commercial operations in 2022.
According to Siemens Gamesa, its recyclable blades use a new type of resin >>>> which “makes it possible to efficiently separate the resin from the other
components at end of the blade’s working life.”
"Other components" which mainly are the glass fibres. That is from one
36 ton blade they get abou 18 tons of resin which, hopefully, is
recyclable and 18 tons of contaminated glass fibres which will be of
little use to anybody.
Those blades are not fully recyclable.
According to some uninformed guy on the internet?
"The materials can then be reused in new applications after separation"
I'm a professional engineer and I worked with 'fibre glass' pressure
vessels and heavy transport equipment.
They blithely say "The materials can then be reused in new
applications after separation" without giving any indication of how
this might be done, what it will all cost, and what applications may
be able to make use of the materials afterwards.
On 9/11/2021 7:57 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 12:55:51 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/11/2021 4:37 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:38:49 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/10/2021 4:19 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:I'm a professional engineer and I worked with 'fibre glass' pressure
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:41:47 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/8/2021 11:41 AM, Byker wrote:
We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simply
amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing >>>>>>>>> world.
If even that far:
"A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can’t just be hauled away. First, you need to saw
through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to
create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The
Dumbass didn't bother to read the OP? None of that is required.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/wind-energy-giant-siemens-gamesa-claims-world-first-in-blade-recycling.html
In a statement, the Spanish-German engineering group claimed its >>>>>>> RecyclableBlades were “the world’s first recyclable wind turbine blades ready
for commercial use offshore.”
Siemens Gamesa said it would work with German utility RWE to install and pilot
the blades at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in the German North Sea, which is
expected to commence commercial operations in 2022.
According to Siemens Gamesa, its recyclable blades use a new type of resin
which “makes it possible to efficiently separate the resin from the other
components at end of the blade’s working life.”
"Other components" which mainly are the glass fibres. That is from one >>>>>> 36 ton blade they get abou 18 tons of resin which, hopefully, is
recyclable and 18 tons of contaminated glass fibres which will be of >>>>>> little use to anybody.
Those blades are not fully recyclable.
According to some uninformed guy on the internet?
"The materials can then be reused in new applications after separation" >>>>
vessels and heavy transport equipment.
They blithely say "The materials can then be reused in new
applications after separation" without giving any indication of how
this might be done, what it will all cost, and what applications may
be able to make use of the materials afterwards.
So you don't really know, but you already decided they "are not fully
recyclable".
So you believe everything you are told until you find out it is wrong?
Merely pointing out that you jumped to conclusions.
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/-/media/siemensgamesa/downloads/en/sustainability/environment/siemens-gamesa-20210901-recycableblade-infographic-finalen.pdf
"The materials are now ready to be used in new products matching the technical
properties of the materials, ie. in the automotive industry, or in consumer >>> goods like flight cases and flatscreen casings."
That's new information, new claims and no more specific than the
first. I will be interested to see how soggy wood and PET foam
Lol, 'new information' from their website which you didn't even
bother to check.
Molten glass plus a whole lot of contaminants. Glass fibres have to be
defect free. They can't include contaminants.
On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 21:43:51 -0400, Mighty Wannabe
<ðŸ‘©ðŸ ½â€ âš•ï¸ ðŸ‘¨â€ âš•ï¸ ðŸ‘®ðŸ‘¨ðŸ ¿â€ ðŸš’ðŸ‘·@🠻.ðŸ ðŸŽ–ï¸ >
wrote:
Eric Stevens wrote on 9/11/2021 5:37 AM:Have you calculated how many tons of hockey pucks, bowling balls etc
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:38:49 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>Use adhesive remover or paint thinner to soak the epoxy-fiberglass. The
wrote:
On 9/10/2021 4:19 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:vessels and heavy transport equipment.
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:41:47 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>According to some uninformed guy on the internet?
wrote:
On 9/8/2021 11:41 AM, Byker wrote:"Other components" which mainly are the glass fibres. That is from one >>>>> 36 ton blade they get abou 18 tons of resin which, hopefully, is
Dumbass didn't bother to read the OP? None of that is required.We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simplyIf even that far:
amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing >>>>>>>> world.
"A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can’t just be hauled away. First, you need to saw
through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to
create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/wind-energy-giant-siemens-gamesa-claims-world-first-in-blade-recycling.html
In a statement, the Spanish-German engineering group claimed its
RecyclableBlades were “the world’s first recyclable wind turbine blades ready
for commercial use offshore.”
Siemens Gamesa said it would work with German utility RWE to install and pilot
the blades at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in the German North Sea, which is
expected to commence commercial operations in 2022.
According to Siemens Gamesa, its recyclable blades use a new type of resin
which “makes it possible to efficiently separate the resin from the other
components at end of the blade’s working life.”
recyclable and 18 tons of contaminated glass fibres which will be of >>>>> little use to anybody.
Those blades are not fully recyclable.
"The materials can then be reused in new applications after separation" >>> I'm a professional engineer and I worked with 'fibre glass' pressure
They blithely say "The materials can then be reused in new
applications after separation" without giving any indication of how
this might be done, what it will all cost, and what applications may
be able to make use of the materials afterwards.
epoxy will soften up. Put the blob into a hydraulic press to squeeze out
the epoxy gloop. Melt the fiberglass mess in a furnace to return to get
molten glass.
The epoxy gloop can be injected under high temperature and heat into
molds to form hockey pucks, bowling balls, etc.
could be produced from decommissioning one small field of wind
generators? No, I thought not.
Eric Stevens wrote on 9/13/2021 12:01 AM:
Molten glass plus a whole lot of contaminants. Glass fibres have to beMy post was in reply to your claim that "I don't see how they can be
defect free. They can't include contaminants.
stripped from their resin without physical damage or leaving residue of
the resin on the fibres".
In my last post I have described a simple process that the resins can be separated from the fiberglass using solvent, high temperature, and
hydraulic press.
The resultant dirty fiberglass can be purified by melting the fiberglass
back into glass. The process will purify the glass because the residual
resin will be burned off.
Do you know that glass is a byproduct of extracting iron from iron ore?
Iron ore is definitely a lot dirtier than the recovered fiberglass from
the resin."
On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 06:20:26 -0400, Mighty Wannabe
<ðŸ‘©ðŸ ½â€ âš•ï¸ ðŸ‘¨â€ âš•ï¸ ðŸ‘®ðŸ‘¨ðŸ ¿â€ ðŸš’ðŸ‘·@🠻.ðŸ ðŸŽ–ï¸ >
wrote:
Eric Stevens wrote on 9/13/2021 12:08 AM:Unless you live in China, they probably bury them.
On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 21:43:51 -0400, Mighty Wannabe
<ðŸ‘©ðŸ ½â€ âš•ï¸ ðŸ‘¨â€ âš•ï¸ ðŸ‘®ðŸ‘¨ðŸ ¿â€ ðŸš’ðŸ‘·@🠻.ðŸ ðŸŽ–ï¸ >
wrote:
Eric Stevens wrote on 9/11/2021 5:37 AM:Have you calculated how many tons of hockey pucks, bowling balls etc
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:38:49 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>Use adhesive remover or paint thinner to soak the epoxy-fiberglass. The >>>> epoxy will soften up. Put the blob into a hydraulic press to squeeze out >>>> the epoxy gloop. Melt the fiberglass mess in a furnace to return to get >>>> molten glass.
wrote:
On 9/10/2021 4:19 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:41:47 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> >>>>>>> wrote:According to some uninformed guy on the internet?
On 9/8/2021 11:41 AM, Byker wrote:"Other components" which mainly are the glass fibres. That is from one >>>>>>> 36 ton blade they get abou 18 tons of resin which, hopefully, is >>>>>>> recyclable and 18 tons of contaminated glass fibres which will be of >>>>>>> little use to anybody.
Dumbass didn't bother to read the OP? None of that is required. >>>>>>>>We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simplyIf even that far:
amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing >>>>>>>>>> world.
"A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can’t just be hauled away. First, you need to saw
through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to
create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/wind-energy-giant-siemens-gamesa-claims-world-first-in-blade-recycling.html
In a statement, the Spanish-German engineering group claimed its >>>>>>>> RecyclableBlades were “the world’s first recyclable wind turbine blades ready
for commercial use offshore.”
Siemens Gamesa said it would work with German utility RWE to install and pilot
the blades at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in the German North Sea, which is
expected to commence commercial operations in 2022.
According to Siemens Gamesa, its recyclable blades use a new type of resin
which “makes it possible to efficiently separate the resin from the other
components at end of the blade’s working life.”
Those blades are not fully recyclable.
"The materials can then be reused in new applications after separation" >>>>> I'm a professional engineer and I worked with 'fibre glass' pressure >>>>> vessels and heavy transport equipment.
They blithely say "The materials can then be reused in new
applications after separation" without giving any indication of how
this might be done, what it will all cost, and what applications may >>>>> be able to make use of the materials afterwards.
The epoxy gloop can be injected under high temperature and heat into
molds to form hockey pucks, bowling balls, etc.
could be produced from decommissioning one small field of wind
generators? No, I thought not.
The use is only limited by your imagination. What do you think they do
with all the plastics we have thrown into our recycle bin?
The recovered resin can be chemically processed into raw polymerQuality new products have a limit on the proportion of new materials
material to make all sorts of plastic.
they can accept.
On Mon, 13 Sep 2021 06:05:01 -0400, Mighty Wannabe
<ðŸ‘©ðŸ ½â€ âš•ï¸ ðŸ‘¨â€ âš•ï¸ ðŸ‘®ðŸ‘¨ðŸ ¿â€ ðŸš’ðŸ‘·@🠻.ðŸ ðŸŽ–ï¸ >
wrote:
Eric Stevens wrote on 9/13/2021 12:01 AM:Burn off leaving no residue? None?
Molten glass plus a whole lot of contaminants. Glass fibres have to beMy post was in reply to your claim that "I don't see how they can be
defect free. They can't include contaminants.
stripped from their resin without physical damage or leaving residue of
the resin on the fibres".
In my last post I have described a simple process that the resins can be
separated from the fiberglass using solvent, high temperature, and
hydraulic press.
The resultant dirty fiberglass can be purified by melting the fiberglass
back into glass. The process will purify the glass because the residual
resin will be burned off.
Do you know that glass is a byproduct of extracting iron from iron ore?Gawd! Where on earth do you get your information from?
Iron ore is definitely a lot dirtier than the recovered fiberglass fromDo you know how clean structural glass has to be?
the resin."
This article describes how glass is made from sand:And sand is iron ore? Well, it is in some parts of the world but see
https://www.explainthatstuff.com/glass.html
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=iron+ore&t=newext&atb=v211-1&iax=images&ia=images
"In a commercial glass plant, sand is mixed with waste glass (from
recycling collections), soda ash (sodium carbonate), and limestone
(calcium carbonate) and heated in a furnace. The soda reduces the sand's
melting point, which helps to save energy during manufacture, but it has
an unfortunate drawback: it produces a kind of glass that would dissolve
in water! The limestone is added to stop that happening. The end-product
is called soda-lime-silica glass. It's the ordinary glass we can see all
around us."
On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 23:38:20 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/11/2021 7:57 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 12:55:51 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/11/2021 4:37 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:38:49 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/10/2021 4:19 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:I'm a professional engineer and I worked with 'fibre glass' pressure >>>>> vessels and heavy transport equipment.
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:41:47 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 9/8/2021 11:41 AM, Byker wrote:
We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simply
amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing >>>>>>>>>> world.
If even that far:
"A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can’t just be hauled away. First, you need to saw
through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to
create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The
Dumbass didn't bother to read the OP? None of that is required. >>>>>>>>
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/wind-energy-giant-siemens-gamesa-claims-world-first-in-blade-recycling.html
In a statement, the Spanish-German engineering group claimed its >>>>>>>> RecyclableBlades were “the world’s first recyclable wind turbine blades ready
for commercial use offshore.”
Siemens Gamesa said it would work with German utility RWE to install and pilot
the blades at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in the German North Sea, which is
expected to commence commercial operations in 2022.
According to Siemens Gamesa, its recyclable blades use a new type of resin
which “makes it possible to efficiently separate the resin from the other
components at end of the blade’s working life.”
"Other components" which mainly are the glass fibres. That is from one >>>>>>> 36 ton blade they get abou 18 tons of resin which, hopefully, is >>>>>>> recyclable and 18 tons of contaminated glass fibres which will be of >>>>>>> little use to anybody.
Those blades are not fully recyclable.
According to some uninformed guy on the internet?
"The materials can then be reused in new applications after separation" >>>>>
They blithely say "The materials can then be reused in new
applications after separation" without giving any indication of how
this might be done, what it will all cost, and what applications may >>>>> be able to make use of the materials afterwards.
So you don't really know, but you already decided they "are not fully
recyclable".
So you believe everything you are told until you find out it is wrong?
Merely pointing out that you jumped to conclusions.
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/-/media/siemensgamesa/downloads/en/sustainability/environment/siemens-gamesa-20210901-recycableblade-infographic-finalen.pdf
"The materials are now ready to be used in new products matching the technical
properties of the materials, ie. in the automotive industry, or in consumer
goods like flight cases and flatscreen casings."
That's new information, new claims and no more specific than the
first. I will be interested to see how soggy wood and PET foam
Lol, 'new information' from their website which you didn't even
bother to check.
Do you expect readers to chase down all the links in an article you
cite. If they are relevant, don't you think you should have cited
them. It was only after I had made my original comment that you gave
me the second link.
On 9/12/2021 11:05 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 23:38:20 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/11/2021 7:57 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 12:55:51 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/11/2021 4:37 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:38:49 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 9/10/2021 4:19 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:I'm a professional engineer and I worked with 'fibre glass' pressure >>>>>> vessels and heavy transport equipment.
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:41:47 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 9/8/2021 11:41 AM, Byker wrote:
We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simply
amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing
world.
If even that far:
"A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can’t just be hauled away. First, you need to saw
through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to
create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The
Dumbass didn't bother to read the OP? None of that is required. >>>>>>>>>
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/wind-energy-giant-siemens-gamesa-claims-world-first-in-blade-recycling.html
In a statement, the Spanish-German engineering group claimed its >>>>>>>>> RecyclableBlades were “the world’s first recyclable wind turbine blades ready
for commercial use offshore.”
Siemens Gamesa said it would work with German utility RWE to install and pilot
the blades at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in the German North Sea, which is
expected to commence commercial operations in 2022.
According to Siemens Gamesa, its recyclable blades use a new type of resin
which “makes it possible to efficiently separate the resin from the other
components at end of the blade’s working life.”
"Other components" which mainly are the glass fibres. That is from one >>>>>>>> 36 ton blade they get abou 18 tons of resin which, hopefully, is >>>>>>>> recyclable and 18 tons of contaminated glass fibres which will be of >>>>>>>> little use to anybody.
Those blades are not fully recyclable.
According to some uninformed guy on the internet?
"The materials can then be reused in new applications after separation" >>>>>>
They blithely say "The materials can then be reused in new
applications after separation" without giving any indication of how >>>>>> this might be done, what it will all cost, and what applications may >>>>>> be able to make use of the materials afterwards.
So you don't really know, but you already decided they "are not fully >>>>> recyclable".
So you believe everything you are told until you find out it is wrong?
Merely pointing out that you jumped to conclusions.
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/-/media/siemensgamesa/downloads/en/sustainability/environment/siemens-gamesa-20210901-recycableblade-infographic-finalen.pdf
"The materials are now ready to be used in new products matching the technical
properties of the materials, ie. in the automotive industry, or in consumer
goods like flight cases and flatscreen casings."
That's new information, new claims and no more specific than the
first. I will be interested to see how soggy wood and PET foam
Lol, 'new information' from their website which you didn't even
bother to check.
Do you expect readers to chase down all the links in an article you
cite. If they are relevant, don't you think you should have cited
them. It was only after I had made my original comment that you gave
me the second link.
I post excerpts here, you should should have had enough sense to look
further before you made all those statements of fact.
On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 20:17:59 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/12/2021 11:05 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 23:38:20 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>
wrote:
On 9/11/2021 7:57 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2021 12:55:51 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com>Merely pointing out that you jumped to conclusions.
wrote:
On 9/11/2021 4:37 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 16:38:49 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 9/10/2021 4:19 AM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 23:41:47 -0500, Unum <noneof@yourbusiness.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 9/8/2021 11:41 AM, Byker wrote:
We've all seen COUNTLESS stories on this supposed "Recycling" which simply
amounts to packing up all our trash and sending it to the developing
world.
If even that far:
"A wind turbine’s blades can be longer than a Boeing 747 wing, so at the end
of their lifespan they can’t just be hauled away. First, you need to saw
through the lissome fiberglass using a diamond-encrusted industrial saw to
create three pieces small enough to be strapped to a tractor-trailer. The
Dumbass didn't bother to read the OP? None of that is required. >>>>>>>>>>
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/07/wind-energy-giant-siemens-gamesa-claims-world-first-in-blade-recycling.html
In a statement, the Spanish-German engineering group claimed its >>>>>>>>>> RecyclableBlades were “the world’s first recyclable wind turbine blades ready
for commercial use offshore.”
Siemens Gamesa said it would work with German utility RWE to install and pilot
the blades at the Kaskasi offshore wind farm in the German North Sea, which is
expected to commence commercial operations in 2022.
According to Siemens Gamesa, its recyclable blades use a new type of resin
which “makes it possible to efficiently separate the resin from the other
components at end of the blade’s working life.”
"Other components" which mainly are the glass fibres. That is from one
36 ton blade they get abou 18 tons of resin which, hopefully, is >>>>>>>>> recyclable and 18 tons of contaminated glass fibres which will be of >>>>>>>>> little use to anybody.
Those blades are not fully recyclable.
According to some uninformed guy on the internet?
"The materials can then be reused in new applications after separation"
I'm a professional engineer and I worked with 'fibre glass' pressure >>>>>>> vessels and heavy transport equipment.
They blithely say "The materials can then be reused in new
applications after separation" without giving any indication of how >>>>>>> this might be done, what it will all cost, and what applications may >>>>>>> be able to make use of the materials afterwards.
So you don't really know, but you already decided they "are not fully >>>>>> recyclable".
So you believe everything you are told until you find out it is wrong? >>>>
https://www.siemensgamesa.com/-/media/siemensgamesa/downloads/en/sustainability/environment/siemens-gamesa-20210901-recycableblade-infographic-finalen.pdf
"The materials are now ready to be used in new products matching the technical
properties of the materials, ie. in the automotive industry, or in consumer
goods like flight cases and flatscreen casings."
That's new information, new claims and no more specific than the
first. I will be interested to see how soggy wood and PET foam
Lol, 'new information' from their website which you didn't even
bother to check.
Do you expect readers to chase down all the links in an article you
cite. If they are relevant, don't you think you should have cited
them. It was only after I had made my original comment that you gave
me the second link.
I post excerpts here, you should should have had enough sense to look
further before you made all those statements of fact.
You expect me to have to analyse your citations to see if they support
your claims in any way? Not bloody likely. Learn to say what you mean.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 296 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 43:12:20 |
| Calls: | 6,648 |
| Files: | 12,193 |
| Messages: | 5,329,635 |