I had given up on sci.engr.lighting but see that at least two of the
old guard are still here. That's great. I've tried participating in
the LinkedIn lighting groups, but they are filled with exaggerated advertising claims that it's almost impossible to have a serious
discussion.
I had given up on sci.engr.lighting but see that at least two of the
old guard are still here. That's great. I've tried participating in
the LinkedIn lighting groups, but they are filled with exaggerated advertising claims that it's almost impossible to have a serious
discussion.
--
Vic Roberts
http://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
http://www.cflfacts.com
sci.engr.lighting Rogues Gallery http://www.langmuir.org
To reply via e-mail:
replace xyz with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.
This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.
Hi Vic and everyone of old in s.e.l.
Consider moving to:
http://www.lighting-gallery.net/index.php
Lots of nice stuff there. My nick there is UV. I've used the site for a couple
of questions, but mainly I've been browsing the photos...
Interesting resource for very old items and people who know their lamps.
Can't really beat the quality of s.e.l. but I'd love to see you guys there. Not
a spam or a promotion service, mind you.
I had given up on sci.engr.lighting but see that at least two of the
old guard are still here. That's great. I've tried participating in
the LinkedIn lighting groups, but they are filled with exaggerated >advertising claims that it's almost impossible to have a serious discussion.
I had given up on sci.engr.lighting but see that at least two of the
old guard are still here. That's great. I've tried participating in
the LinkedIn lighting groups, but they are filled with exaggerated advertising claims that it's almost impossible to have a serious
discussion.
I had given up on sci.engr.lighting but see that at least two of the
old guard are still here. That's great. I've tried participating in
the LinkedIn lighting groups, but they are filled with exaggerated advertising claims that it's almost impossible to have a serious
discussion.
--
Vic Roberts
http://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
http://www.cflfacts.com
sci.engr.lighting Rogues Gallery http://www.langmuir.org
To reply via e-mail:
replace xyz with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.
This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.
I had given up on sci.engr.lighting but see that at least two of the
old guard are still here. That's great. I've tried participating in
the LinkedIn lighting groups, but they are filled with exaggerated advertising claims that it's almost impossible to have a serious
discussion.
--
Vic Roberts
http://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
http://www.cflfacts.com
sci.engr.lighting Rogues Gallery http://www.langmuir.org
To reply via e-mail:
replace xyz with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.
This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.
I had given up on sci.engr.lighting but see that at least two of the
old guard are still here. That's great. I've tried participating in
the LinkedIn lighting groups, but they are filled with exaggerated >advertising claims that it's almost impossible to have a serious
discussion.
On Wed, 11 May 2016 07:38:23 -0400, Victor Roberts <xyz@lighting-research.com> wrote:
I had given up on sci.engr.lighting but see that at least two of the
old guard are still here. That's great. I've tried participating in
the LinkedIn lighting groups, but they are filled with exaggerated
advertising claims that it's almost impossible to have a serious
discussion.
Well, after another 2 1/2 years, I'm back once again. How many of
then old timers are still here?
Vic Roberts
Jeff Waymouth still checks in
Jeff
On 11/26/2018 8:16 PM, Victor Roberts wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2016 07:38:23 -0400, Victor Roberts
<xyz@lighting-research.com> wrote:
I had given up on sci.engr.lighting but see that at least two of the
old guard are still here. That's great. I've tried participating in
the LinkedIn lighting groups, but they are filled with exaggerated
advertising claims that it's almost impossible to have a serious
discussion.
Well, after another 2 1/2 years, I'm back once again. How many of
then old timers are still here?
Vic Roberts
Hi Jeff!
Vic
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:54:08 -0500, Jeff Waymouth
<jfwaymouth3@comcast.net> wrote:
Jeff Waymouth still checks in
Jeff
On 11/26/2018 8:16 PM, Victor Roberts wrote:
On Wed, 11 May 2016 07:38:23 -0400, Victor Roberts
<xyz@lighting-research.com> wrote:
I had given up on sci.engr.lighting but see that at least two of the
old guard are still here. That's great. I've tried participating in
the LinkedIn lighting groups, but they are filled with exaggerated
advertising claims that it's almost impossible to have a serious
discussion.
Well, after another 2 1/2 years, I'm back once again. How many of
then old timers are still here?
Vic Roberts
On Wed, 11 May 2016 07:38:23 -0400, Victor Roberts <xyz@lighting-research.com> wrote:
I had given up on sci.engr.lighting but see that at least two of the
old guard are still here. That's great. I've tried participating in
the LinkedIn lighting groups, but they are filled with exaggerated >>advertising claims that it's almost impossible to have a serious >>discussion.
Well, after another 2 1/2 years, I'm back once again. How many of
then old timers are still here?
in article <5l6pvdl1sn058vbdu7a819a7p5p11u2mos@4ax.com>,
Victor Roberts <vicroberts@earthlink.net> writes:
On Wed, 11 May 2016 07:38:23 -0400, Victor Roberts
<xyz@lighting-research.com> wrote:
I had given up on sci.engr.lighting but see that at least two of the
old guard are still here. That's great. I've tried participating in
the LinkedIn lighting groups, but they are filled with exaggerated >>>advertising claims that it's almost impossible to have a serious >>>discussion.
Well, after another 2 1/2 years, I'm back once again. How many of
then old timers are still here?
I still check for any updates every day or two when I'm checking
out other groups I'm still using.
Well, after another 2 1/2 years, I'm back once again. How many of
then old timers are still here?
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:16:23 -0500, Victor Roberts <vicroberts@earthlink.net> wrote:
Well, after another 2 1/2 years, I'm back once again. How many of
then old timers are still here?
I check messages here roughly monthly along with the only other
newsgroup I still follow whenever I actually remember to do so. :-)
But of course there's usually no activity at all. :-(
I still like learning about lighting technology. Over the last year or
so I've been experimenting with the Philips Hue smart bulb products
and their software programming support and have been having quite a
bit of fun with that, especially the color RGBW bulbs.
I had given up on sci.engr.lighting but see that at least two of the
old guard are still here. That's great. I've tried participating in
the LinkedIn lighting groups, but they are filled with exaggerated advertising claims that it's almost impossible to have a serious
discussion.
--
Vic Roberts
http://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
http://www.cflfacts.com
sci.engr.lighting Rogues Gallery http://www.langmuir.org
To reply via e-mail:
replace xyz with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.
This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.
I had given up on sci.engr.lighting but see that at least two of the
old guard are still here. That's great. I've tried participating in
the LinkedIn lighting groups, but they are filled with exaggerated advertising claims that it's almost impossible to have a serious
discussion.
--
Vic Roberts
http://www.RobertsResearchInc.com
http://www.cflfacts.com
sci.engr.lighting Rogues Gallery http://www.langmuir.org
To reply via e-mail:
replace xyz with vdr in the Reply to: address
or use e-mail address listed at the Web site.
This information is provided for educational purposes only.
It may not be used in any publication or posted on any Web
site without written permission.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 26:24:34 |
Calls: | 6,646 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,193 |
Messages: | 5,327,944 |