• productivity SMAW 6013 vs 7018

    From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 14 23:45:13 2023
    Hi all

    With more welding experience repairing the hull of a seagoing vessel,
    the meaning of the wise words of a late mentor who used to contribute
    a lot on here came to me.

    I've appended my calculations.

    To get a 6mm fillet, you could have
    * a 3.2mm-dia (1/8th-inch) 7018 rod at about 125A
    * a 5.0mm-dia 6013 (~3/16-inch) at about 200A

    If productivity is proportional to Amps, productivity of 6013 is 160%
    of the productivity of 7018.

    Yes 7018 is massively tough compared to 6013.
    But sometimes you can tear-out the plate-surface with a good 6013
    fillet, so there is no call for vastly more toughness and ductility.

    This dawned on me when I was wondering why people were bothering
    weaving 3.2mm 6013 building up a big bead.
    For eg. lap joints overplating a steel hull, that 200A is not a
    problem because the run-rate is fast - twice that of 7018 - and the
    polarity is Direct Current Electrode Negative (DCEN) - smooth and
    consistent but not very penetrative, so at 200A you'd be absolutely
    fine "striping" a 6013 fillet.

    I've just "seen it".
    If I've got this right...
    Have I got this right?

    Regards,
    Rich Smith

    ================================================================

    A_rod=pi.d^2/4
    A_fillet=z^2/2

    6013
    ----

    run-out-length = rod length
    A_fillet=A_rod

    z=sqrt(pi.d^2/2)

    (defun z-6013 (roddia) (sqrt (/ (* pi (expt roddia 2)) 2e0)))

    (sqrt (* (my-circle-area-dia 3.2) 2)) ;; 4.010605239409601
    (z-6013 3.2) ;; 4.010605239409601

    7018
    ----

    run-out-length = half of rod length
    A_fillet=2.A_rod
    z=sqrt(pi.d^2/4)

    (defun z-7018 (roddia) (sqrt (* pi (expt roddia 2))))

    (z-7018 3.2) ;; 5.671852322897651
    (sqrt (* (my-circle-area-dia 3.2) 4)) ;; 5.671852322897651

    ================================================================

    (z-7018 3.2) ;; 5.671852322897651 ;; that would be at about 125A
    (z-6013 4.0) ;; 5.0132565492620005 ;; that would be at about 160A?
    (z-6013 5.0) ;; 6.266570686577501 ;; that would be at about 200A?

    For given fillet size, productivity would be much increased with 6013 vs 7018. Compensating for all factors and using 5mm 6013 for 3.2mm 7018,
    (/f 200 125) ;; 1.6
    more than half as fast again.

    Remember 5mm 6013 for 6mm fillet...

    --------------------------------

    (z-6013 6) ;; 7.519884823893001
    (z-7018 4) ;; 7.0898154036220635

    --------------------------------

    Also think with 6013, are on DCEN and running fast, so can weld
    material of thickness about the rod dia?
    Fits with all I have seen. eg. my "short arc training T-fillet"
    (Newham College, etc.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)