• GMAW Ar/15%CO2 - good? (used in UK)

    From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 31 09:14:31 2021
    Hi everyone

    Reason for saying "in UK" is there's an orthodoxy which means it's
    difficult to get other than Ar/20%CO2.
    So for the rest of the world this "wow!" moment would come as a
    surprise.

    I worked at a highly-skilled high-specification place and they did
    have Ar/15%CO2.
    Can get clearly formed spray transfer.
    Do not get "cannonball" spatters.
    Delight to use

    (eg. with Ar/20%CO2, for the time spent welding, you often spend half
    as much time again chipping off spatter - even have an air power tool
    to to it it's such a common matter)

    Is Ar/12%CO2 better still?
    Problem we'd have here is most weld qualification with "M21" gas - so
    Ar/15%CO2 good, but Ar/12%CO2 is in category "M20" and would need new
    WPQR and WPS.
    If all dip-transfer MIG/GMAW is positional eg. v-up, or low thickness
    (eg. butt/girth welding RHS's together), is Ar/12%CO2 even better?
    Spray transfer - even clearer defined? Or same as with 15%CO2?
    "bite" with dip-transfer still good for positional?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snag@21:1/5 to Richard Smith on Mon May 31 06:54:09 2021
    On 5/31/2021 3:14 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
    Hi everyone

    Reason for saying "in UK" is there's an orthodoxy which means it's
    difficult to get other than Ar/20%CO2.
    So for the rest of the world this "wow!" moment would come as a
    surprise.

    I worked at a highly-skilled high-specification place and they did
    have Ar/15%CO2.
    Can get clearly formed spray transfer.
    Do not get "cannonball" spatters.
    Delight to use

    (eg. with Ar/20%CO2, for the time spent welding, you often spend half
    as much time again chipping off spatter - even have an air power tool
    to to it it's such a common matter)

    Is Ar/12%CO2 better still?
    Problem we'd have here is most weld qualification with "M21" gas - so Ar/15%CO2 good, but Ar/12%CO2 is in category "M20" and would need new
    WPQR and WPS.
    If all dip-transfer MIG/GMAW is positional eg. v-up, or low thickness
    (eg. butt/girth welding RHS's together), is Ar/12%CO2 even better?
    Spray transfer - even clearer defined? Or same as with 15%CO2?
    "bite" with dip-transfer still good for positional?


    I'm just a "hobby welder" and my machine is a light duty Lincoln
    Weldpak 100 , but I've been using straight CO2 for years . I don't have
    what I consider excessive spatter ... Most MIG users here - including my neighbor who is a pro weldor - are using 25% CO2 unless they're welding aluminum , which calls for pure argon . Seems like from what you've
    posted here in the past that the industry there isn't willing to try
    anything new ... any chance you could rig a setup that would allow you
    the mix your gasses at different proportions to test your hypotheses ?
    --
    Snag
    Race only matters to racists ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Billington@21:1/5 to Richard Smith on Mon May 31 13:48:36 2021
    On 31/05/2021 09:14, Richard Smith wrote:
    Hi everyone

    Reason for saying "in UK" is there's an orthodoxy which means it's
    difficult to get other than Ar/20%CO2.
    So for the rest of the world this "wow!" moment would come as a
    surprise.

    I worked at a highly-skilled high-specification place and they did
    have Ar/15%CO2.
    Can get clearly formed spray transfer.
    Do not get "cannonball" spatters.
    Delight to use

    (eg. with Ar/20%CO2, for the time spent welding, you often spend half
    as much time again chipping off spatter - even have an air power tool
    to to it it's such a common matter)

    Is Ar/12%CO2 better still?
    Problem we'd have here is most weld qualification with "M21" gas - so Ar/15%CO2 good, but Ar/12%CO2 is in category "M20" and would need new
    WPQR and WPS.
    If all dip-transfer MIG/GMAW is positional eg. v-up, or low thickness
    (eg. butt/girth welding RHS's together), is Ar/12%CO2 even better?
    Spray transfer - even clearer defined? Or same as with 15%CO2?
    "bite" with dip-transfer still good for positional?

    I use BOC Argoshield light which is 93% Ar, 5% CO2, 2% O2 I've never had
    a problem getting it. The Argoshield Universal is 86% Ar, 12% CO2, and
    2% O2 I've no idea about availability as I've never needed to ask.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to David Billington on Wed Jun 2 07:08:31 2021
    David Billington <djb@invalid.com> writes:

    On 31/05/2021 09:14, Richard Smith wrote:
    ...
    "bite" with dip-transfer still good for positional?

    I use BOC Argoshield light which is 93% Ar, 5% CO2, 2% O2 I've never
    had a problem getting it. The Argoshield Universal is 86% Ar, 12% CO2,
    and 2% O2 I've no idea about availability as I've never needed to ask.

    OK - thanks for relating experience.
    It's the "Argoshield Light / Medium / Heavy", a catchy marketing
    slogan from some time ago, which is exactly why we have this problem,
    with it becoming an orthodoxy.
    There was only dip transfer then, which contributed to getting it
    fairly much the wrong way around.
    The problem is most have qualified their welds - done WPQR tests, with
    all the costs of witnessing and tests - with Ar 20%CO2 (2%O2) - which
    is in gas category "M21".
    Ar 12%CO2 (2%O2) is in gas category "M20". Which I suspect these days
    you'd want. But there's no way for me to know. Requalifying welds - expensive. "Painted into corner". A situation that's more political
    than technical?

    I don't know if with 5%CO2 you'd have enough "bite" to do dip transfer
    on positional thick plate and box-sections (SHS, RHS - efficient low thicknesses compared to plate and beam)?
    Honestly - never chance to try, and no-one to ask.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 2 06:52:07 2021
    Snag - is commercial welding - fine line with productivity and cost.
    With a big industrial welding machine on 3-phase power, you can and
    will be using spray transfer a lot of the time. Around 8kW at the
    arc. More into the machine.
    This gas optimisation is about getting good spray transfer, which
    starts at 240A 29V - lowest commercial spray transfer condition and a
    nice condition actually.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Billington@21:1/5 to Richard Smith on Wed Jun 2 16:42:53 2021
    On 02/06/2021 07:08, Richard Smith wrote:
    David Billington <djb@invalid.com> writes:

    On 31/05/2021 09:14, Richard Smith wrote:
    ...
    "bite" with dip-transfer still good for positional?
    I use BOC Argoshield light which is 93% Ar, 5% CO2, 2% O2 I've never
    had a problem getting it. The Argoshield Universal is 86% Ar, 12% CO2,
    and 2% O2 I've no idea about availability as I've never needed to ask.
    OK - thanks for relating experience.
    It's the "Argoshield Light / Medium / Heavy", a catchy marketing
    slogan from some time ago, which is exactly why we have this problem,
    with it becoming an orthodoxy.
    There was only dip transfer then, which contributed to getting it
    fairly much the wrong way around.
    The problem is most have qualified their welds - done WPQR tests, with
    all the costs of witnessing and tests - with Ar 20%CO2 (2%O2) - which
    is in gas category "M21".
    Ar 12%CO2 (2%O2) is in gas category "M20". Which I suspect these days
    you'd want. But there's no way for me to know. Requalifying welds - expensive. "Painted into corner". A situation that's more political
    than technical?

    I don't know if with 5%CO2 you'd have enough "bite" to do dip transfer
    on positional thick plate and box-sections (SHS, RHS - efficient low thicknesses compared to plate and beam)?
    Honestly - never chance to try, and no-one to ask.

    I don't know how long the Argoshield gases have been around it's just
    what I use currently. My venerable old Eland MIG is only 160A so dip
    transfer only AFAIK but it suits my needs fine. The only time I've had
    the pleasure of trying spray transfer was at a small welding show back
    in about 1985 in Bristol and it worked great but I don't need to weld
    thick stuff very often, when I do I'll either use MMA  or farm it out.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to David Billington on Thu Jun 3 09:11:11 2021
    David Billington <djb@invalid.com> writes:

    On 02/06/2021 07:08, Richard Smith wrote:
    David Billington <djb@invalid.com> writes:

    On 31/05/2021 09:14, Richard Smith wrote:
    ...
    ...
    ...
    I don't know how long the Argoshield gases have been around it's just
    what I use currently. My venerable old Eland MIG is only 160A so dip
    transfer only AFAIK but it suits my needs fine. The only time I've had
    the pleasure of trying spray transfer was at a small welding show back
    in about 1985 in Bristol and it worked great but I don't need to weld
    thick stuff very often, when I do I'll either use MMA  or farm it out.

    Commercially - if "spray" would be advantageous, do it, obviously.
    * penetration / fusion - very adequare - not absurd - about
    "Goldilocks quantity" = just right
    * * no spatter * - not spending ages tidying-up / de-spattering
    * washes away oxides - totally satisfactory welds low Execution Class
    2 over light off-the-mill black scale and weldable primer.
    * smooth low-effort welding - very radiatant arc illuminates area for
    easy view of weld
    * etc.

    By the way - best have a long shroud on torch which is optimum for
    spray.

    Spray puts a lot of heat load on the torch.
    So one of
    * water-cooled torch
    * big spray-capable air cooled torch
    * only spray where necessary, dip transfer when can get away with it -
    and "enhanced air cooling" - puncture a fine hole through a plastic
    bottle top, fill with clean water, and between runs squeeze bottle
    to make "spider's web strand" jet of water onto air-cooling fins of
    torch until stops evaporating

    Reminds me I have come a long way, even if I am aware there is still
    so much to learn - only know a fraction of what someone does if have
    been a welder non-stop since leaving school.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 5 07:07:05 2021
    ...
    I don't need to weld thick stuff very often, when I do I'll either
    use MMA ...

    David - sounds like a very good technically sound choice.
    "stick"/SMAW has that advantage.
    'tother advantage is - while "stick"'s doing nothing, it's costing
    nothing. Good for infrequently used process, obviouisly.
    Whereas MIG/GMAW - gas bottle hire - need regular work to justify it.
    Well, you know all this. Just agreeing, for what it's worth.
    Rich S

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snag@21:1/5 to Richard Smith on Sat Jun 5 06:51:17 2021
    On 6/5/2021 1:07 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
    ...
    I don't need to weld thick stuff very often, when I do I'll either
    use MMA ...

    David - sounds like a very good technically sound choice.
    "stick"/SMAW has that advantage.
    'tother advantage is - while "stick"'s doing nothing, it's costing
    nothing. Good for infrequently used process, obviouisly.
    Whereas MIG/GMAW - gas bottle hire - need regular work to justify it.
    Well, you know all this. Just agreeing, for what it's worth.
    Rich S


    Every bottle I have here is owned , not leased ... I leased an oxygen
    bottle for a couple of years because the supplier (NLR out of north
    Little Rock Ar) refused to refill my 20 cf bottles . When I found a
    supplier that would and returned that leased bottle , the new manager
    GAVE me a couple of empty 20's as an apology for the previous manager's
    being an asshole . They could have filled MY bottles rather than swap
    them , but he was an asshole who didn't like "small guys" .
    --
    Snag
    Race only matters to racists ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Wilkins@21:1/5 to Richard Smith on Sat Jun 5 17:29:17 2021
    "Snag" wrote in message news:s9fofj$53a$1@dont-email.me...

    On 6/5/2021 1:07 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
    ...
    I don't need to weld thick stuff very often, when I do I'll either
    use MMA ...

    David - sounds like a very good technically sound choice.
    "stick"/SMAW has that advantage.
    'tother advantage is - while "stick"'s doing nothing, it's costing
    nothing. Good for infrequently used process, obviouisly.
    Whereas MIG/GMAW - gas bottle hire - need regular work to justify it.
    Well, you know all this. Just agreeing, for what it's worth.
    Rich S


    Every bottle I have here is owned , not leased ... I leased an oxygen
    bottle for a couple of years because the supplier (NLR out of north
    Little Rock Ar) refused to refill my 20 cf bottles . When I found a
    supplier that would and returned that leased bottle , the new manager
    GAVE me a couple of empty 20's as an apology for the previous manager's
    being an asshole . They could have filled MY bottles rather than swap
    them , but he was an asshole who didn't like "small guys" .
    --
    Snag
    Race only matters to racists ...

    ------------------------
    Same here in NH, but the dealers will sell only the smaller portable tanks,
    not the industrial sizes.
    https://hobbyweld.co.uk/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snag@21:1/5 to Jim Wilkins on Sat Jun 5 22:41:17 2021
    On 6/5/2021 4:29 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Snag"  wrote in message news:s9fofj$53a$1@dont-email.me...

    On 6/5/2021 1:07 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
    ...
    I don't need to weld thick stuff very often, when I do I'll either
    use MMA ...

    David - sounds like a very good technically sound choice.
    "stick"/SMAW has that advantage.
    'tother advantage is - while "stick"'s doing nothing, it's costing
    nothing.  Good for infrequently used process, obviouisly.
    Whereas MIG/GMAW - gas bottle hire - need regular work to justify it.
    Well, you know all this.  Just agreeing, for what it's worth.
    Rich S


      Every bottle I have here is owned , not leased ... I leased an oxygen bottle for a couple of years because the supplier (NLR out of north
    Little Rock Ar) refused to refill my 20 cf bottles . When I found a
    supplier that would and returned that leased bottle , the new manager
    GAVE me a couple of empty 20's as an apology for the previous manager's
    being an asshole . They could have filled MY bottles rather than swap
    them , but he was an asshole who didn't like "small guys" .


    Same here in NH, but the dealers will sell only the smaller portable
    tanks, not the industrial sizes.
    https://hobbyweld.co.uk/

    ---------------------------

    The only big tank I have is the argon for the TIG welder , it's a 300
    cf . CO2 , oxy and acetylene are all the smaller bottles . That's OK
    though , I don't use that much of any of them - my last argon bottle
    lasted like 3 years . I might use a pair of OA bottles (20 cf O2 , "B"
    tank of acetylene) in a year ... especially now that I have a plasma
    cutter .
    --
    Snag
    Race only matters to racists ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Snag on Fri Jun 25 14:11:25 2021
    On 6/5/2021 8:41 PM, Snag wrote:
    On 6/5/2021 4:29 PM, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Snag"  wrote in message news:s9fofj$53a$1@dont-email.me...

    On 6/5/2021 1:07 AM, Richard Smith wrote:
    ...
    I don't need to weld thick stuff very often, when I do I'll either
    use MMA ...

    David - sounds like a very good technically sound choice.
    "stick"/SMAW has that advantage.
    'tother advantage is - while "stick"'s doing nothing, it's costing
    nothing.  Good for infrequently used process, obviouisly.
    Whereas MIG/GMAW - gas bottle hire - need regular work to justify it.
    Well, you know all this.  Just agreeing, for what it's worth.
    Rich S


       Every bottle I have here is owned , not leased ... I leased an oxygen >> bottle for a couple of years because the supplier (NLR out of north
    Little Rock Ar) refused to refill my 20 cf bottles . When I found a
    supplier that would and returned that leased bottle , the new manager
    GAVE me a couple of empty 20's as an apology for the previous manager's
    being an asshole . They could have filled MY bottles rather than swap
    them , but he was an asshole who didn't like "small guys" .


    Same here in NH, but the dealers will sell only the smaller portable
    tanks, not the industrial sizes.
    https://hobbyweld.co.uk/

    ---------------------------

     The only big tank I have is the argon for the TIG welder , it's a 300
    cf . CO2 , oxy and acetylene are all the smaller bottles . That's OK
    though , I don't use that much of any of them - my last argon bottle
    lasted like 3 years . I might use a pair of OA bottles (20 cf O2 , "B"
    tank of acetylene) in a year ... especially now that I have a plasma
    cutter .

    I am a big fan of owner bottles. I have several, and will probably get
    a couple more.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob La Londe@21:1/5 to Richard Smith on Thu Aug 26 10:58:44 2021
    On 6/1/2021 10:52 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
    Snag - is commercial welding - fine line with productivity and cost.
    With a big industrial welding machine on 3-phase power, you can and
    will be using spray transfer a lot of the time. Around 8kW at the
    arc. More into the machine.
    This gas optimisation is about getting good spray transfer, which
    starts at 240A 29V - lowest commercial spray transfer condition and a
    nice condition actually.



    I think Snag was talking about setting up a gas mixing setup to test
    your ideas. I have not seen one, but I seem to recall people talking
    about having such a rig right here on this group in years past. They
    hook up two bottles and the rig mixes it to give you the desired ratio.


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Richard Smith@21:1/5 to Bob La Londe on Thu Aug 26 21:30:56 2021
    Bob La Londe <none@none.com99> writes:

    On 6/1/2021 10:52 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
    Snag - is commercial welding - fine line with productivity and cost.
    With a big industrial welding machine on 3-phase power, you can and
    will be using spray transfer a lot of the time. Around 8kW at the
    arc. More into the machine.
    This gas optimisation is about getting good spray transfer, which
    starts at 240A 29V - lowest commercial spray transfer condition and a
    nice condition actually.



    I think Snag was talking about setting up a gas mixing setup to test
    your ideas. I have not seen one, but I seem to recall people talking
    about having such a rig right here on this group in years past. They
    hook up two bottles and the rig mixes it to give you the desired
    ratio.


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    Oh if I've misread his post and said something skewy I extend
    apologies to Snag.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snag@21:1/5 to Richard Smith on Thu Aug 26 22:24:40 2021
    On 8/26/2021 3:30 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
    Bob La Londe <none@none.com99> writes:

    On 6/1/2021 10:52 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
    Snag - is commercial welding - fine line with productivity and cost.
    With a big industrial welding machine on 3-phase power, you can and
    will be using spray transfer a lot of the time. Around 8kW at the
    arc. More into the machine.
    This gas optimisation is about getting good spray transfer, which
    starts at 240A 29V - lowest commercial spray transfer condition and a
    nice condition actually.



    I think Snag was talking about setting up a gas mixing setup to test
    your ideas. I have not seen one, but I seem to recall people talking
    about having such a rig right here on this group in years past. They
    hook up two bottles and the rig mixes it to give you the desired
    ratio.


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
    https://www.avg.com

    Oh if I've misread his post and said something skewy I extend
    apologies to Snag.


    Bob is right about what I meant , and no apology needed . What you
    need is 2 (or more) flow meters working at the same pressure , you
    adjust the flow meters to the desired proportion - say 20 cfh Ar and 10
    cfh CO2 would give you 66/33 . You can regulate the actual gas flow
    downstream , the critical factor is the ratio from each source .
    --
    Snag
    Race only matters to racists ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)