[continued from previous message]

Another infinity is the evaluation of a an arbitrarily large numers of math equation at a sentient gazer, or notably a macroscopic gazer big enough to view a data-meessage with sperable bits or equation letters. “hey, give looking over this equation
once at a computer base, or humna equation generator makes nonfinite math for a sentieince to solve.

technology thing: one neuron, possibly with a physiociculating metalloporphyrin, is illuminated with a quantum linked photon; the illumination effects the electron distribution of the atom, which bends/effects a neuron’s chemistry, which then affects a
retinal-cytes output, which is then an an actual observed photon.

The pleasant thing about his is that a cognitive being or nonconscious computer could use any of tested neuron component of Dave “scrhoedinger’s neuron” theory, different nonfinite unitary MRI (I think), restructuralizations of infinite/nonfite
amounts, standing quantum wave, to build a hedonisting imperative causing and creating and apllied technology

Also, notably, I have already experienced a time technology, suggesting that sentiences at a unity-or less amount sized amount could build a hedonistic imperative an nonfinite lifespan number of preexisting MWI universes;




IF size

Could those areas of the brain that respond to transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS) be particularly easy to reach with photonic stimulkation of photostimulatable drugs because of the near area of the tisuue and the less tissue that the photons have to
travel through?

Better plywood and particle board: Wikipedia describes ural-formaldehyde glue at particle board and plywood; It is possible that what might be thriftier, although I have no idea if it would be better as a material is to genetically engineer or breed wood
plants like some trees to make much more sap or resin, then find a free radical catalysts that turns the new larger amount of resin to a structurally functional glue

Math: “a computation theoretical schemata for an online recursive self feeding automata which can be by way of tail recursion, which can be implemented using iteration” reminds me of how to get cellular automata based data compression to work better;
Figuring out seed and tree that generates an uncompressed data object could work better if you feed the tree branches or their string generation [][][][][][] (2d data as list) back into the [][][][][] (2d data as list). so basically, grow a tree, find
relationships or equations that say something about what generates what, then use those equations, as CA rules with the tree refeeding its own base seed/technique. Primitive thinking on my part and a mathematician could do better, but sometimes there
are things where if you have two values sometimes there are rules/equations about what can be found between them.

So if the data is a phone book, an equation or rule set, possibly with the “ that narrows the possible tree output to things with lots of vowels or spaces between 3-10 letter strings could make a first approxination that is structurally near accurate (
and with vowel frequency, statistically nearer the actual goal data-string) to sequentially refine. That would reduce the amount of CPU cycles to compress the big data string initially.

Then again, Generating a “near miss” to the data string CPU-cyle-cheaply then adjusting the seed and CA ruleset to upgrade the “near miss” to the actual specific data string to be compressed might take just as much, more, or less computation. I
do not have any idea, it is just an alternative approach. So the idea is that tree-refeedback could generate the “near miss” with a test of “looks, structurally, like the data string” then just make lesser, easier to compute changes to the seed,
possibly using “recursive self feeding automata” once the CA generates a structural match to the goal string, like lots of vowels or regular space characters.

This structure first, then refine approach could also decrease the number of CA tree growth increments, that is it would generate the tree with less CPU cycles. Also, it seems possible to find different rulesets and seeds and number of tree generations
that produce the same goal data string. More than one way to produce the goal string. Among the multiple ways found, one could be fastest to expand (decompress) from having fewest tree-line generations.

At an automata, “Each variable in the CFG [context free grammar] corresponds to a language; this language is recursively defined using other variables. We hence look upon each variable as a module; and define modules that accept words by calling other
modules recursively” http://msl.cs.uiuc.edu/~btovar/cs475/hw/recaut.pdf , reminds me of producing a durable island of meaning , where the island is the CFG, (made up of automata output and little-part stored and produced values); causes me to think, “
it, the grammar, and the language, is the drift or gist of a bunch of functions and numbers that comprise it”. Perhaps a normal distribution, graphic, generating eqaution, and part/area isolating equations are a drift or gist that creates a language
that says “normal distribution” Then again, that is kind of being overly broad as it seems to just restate, “equations can describe a system”. My loose reinterpretation of the word “language” at the quote is kind of just saying once you
have equations of the normal distribution you can then recombine these equations as a sort of words to make completely new statements about a normal distribution (possibly also doing some exciting grammar thing where what comes first and next and
possibly what/where is a verb is, has a definite pattern, possibly a CFG generated grammar). Gee it just sounds like “math says things, and the math you use to say things can be reordered to say new things and make new descriptions” which seems very
very well known.

At the same paper it says, “Intuitively, if q′∈δm(q, m′), then Xq can generate a word of the form xy where x is accepted using a call to module m and y is accepted from the state q” (perhaps it is saying: where a new generated thing meets a
previous stored state) The line from that paper seems like an actual parts that work and do something, actual usable math, way of saying: we generated a CFG where a variable can be placed next to another variable in a relationship. That is it generates
something like an axiom of grammar, while simultaneously building things from previous stored state.

The automata that generates the context free grammer, that might be doing specific instances of, “math says things, and the math you use to say things can be reordered to say new things and make new descriptions” has one line of a multi-line
description that says, “Intuitively, a transition within a module is simulated by generating the letter on the transition and generating a variable that stands for the language generated from the next state.” OK, that is exciting to read, and seems
like the english explanation of the “Intuitively, if q′∈δm(q, m′)…(more text)” descriptive/defining actual math or logic-like language of the paper. It might sort of say: one part of one thing, and another previous-like thing, together make
up a durable grammar (way of saying things) which is sompletely different than the interpretation at the start of this paragraph, but I will leave the first part of the paragraph as it is becuase it is also entertaining.

Dave Pearce: “look upon each variable as a module; and define modules that accept words by calling other modules recursively” The possibility of an automata generated context free grammar (CFG) functioning at systems that extend the chronological
length/duration of an uncollapsed quantum state, (possibly looked upon as a math-way where CFGs could produce time intervals that cause quantum events to require different amounts (more or less amount) of observation (some interpretations of quantum
mechanics) or different amounts of atom-to-atom interactions sufficient to decohere a quantum system (some other interpretations of quantum mechanics). Dave Pearce refers to some person who says the duration length of an unresolved quantum superposition
is “femtoseconds” at an aqueaous chemical system like a neuron. Some technological instantiation of Context free grammars, technologically implemented as automata, could change the femtoseconds to seconds, as well as possibly effect the atom,
molecule, or even tissue-span (like the actual physical dimensions/AMU) of the superposed amount of stuff. For Dave, bigger tissue/cyte/neurons being superposed for longer intervals eases scientific and technological research, where I perceive Dave wants
to find the source of the source of conscious awareness (at his published at Quora version he uses “schoedinger’s neurons” as a quick memorable description); as well as new consciousness technology production.

Thinking of Dave’s “schedinger’s neurons” idea: noting that an automata context free grammer could effect the chronological length or physical span of unresolved quantum events (UQE), what would you make it out of, and niftily, entertainingly,
math and science-wise can you search for multi-cyte feedbacks, procedures, automata or basically computer programs at existing proteins, cytes, and tissues, including neurons?

If they find, or technologically make, a UQE chronological interval extending automata/math relationship at proteins/cytes/tissues it could be possible to change that or link that to the naturally occuring “dwell time” of neurons, parts of neurons (
like synapses and dendrites); the longer the interval of dwell time it is possible the experiments are easier and the technologies are easier to produce; perhaps neurons, as per Dave’s idea, might have some surveyable systemic relationships that could
be restated as automata, or other computer-program like assemblages, and these assemblages could define the quantum unresolved time interval that these UQE last. If you find the automata/program at the neuron or its parts then you could use that computer
science/math sourced expected interval to make experiments out of. 100 ns experiments, 1 second experiments, 24 hours experiments, all based on the math-predicted length of UQE at the CNS or neurons.

also, what about really long computer programs or automata; could could these generate nonfinite lengths, or even multiday lengths of UQE at protein/tissues/cytes like neurons? If Dave’s “schoedinger’s neurons” Idea has value, then finding UQE
systems with intervals of hours or days could redefine thought, pre-thought, something like the feel of the day. Beyond the causual psychological observation that the mind flits from thing to thing with metaphor:variaed lighting (a metaphor for feeling
or sustained nonconscious perspective): Thoughts change all the time at less than 1 second intervals while often tilted with a kind of gestalt of multi-hour (apparently) noncognitive baseline of a perspective like cheerful.

New drugs or CNS structures that change the intervals produced with CFGs or other means of effecting the UQE duration at the sentient being could create new forms of sentience. Supersentience could possibly go with more actual isness from
technologizations like genetic modification, drugs, implants, or cytological sized computation technology objects. (a greater or different amount of isness contrasts with just feeling more isness from say, stimulant drugs or LSD).

From Dave’s perspective, a sentience that compares p-zombies with 2018 AD humans, it is possible supersentiences based on UQE duration modifying CFG proteins/cytes (like neurons)/tissues would create beings that think we are like p-zombies in
comparison with a supersentience’ amount of beneficial isness. Also this could have sentient AI technology applications. As previously described, things with varied and lengthy UQE, per Dave’s theory, are one more possible way to generate
consciousness. Noting the standing wave solitons, mirrors, and atom-parabola imitation-atoms formable from energy; also noting that these can generate things like standing waves, and that standing waves of custom frequency or duration, could have
different, varying, possibly longer UQE intervals, engineerable to imitate and improve upon those human sentience producing effects at Dave’s “schroedinger’s neurons” idea, could be a new technological way to create artifical sentience, awareness,
isness.

I saw a parabola as well as a circle of atoms making a nodal wave additioneffect: a new blob of charge, and the new cofocally-sourced blob of charge can act like a charged atom. Atom parabola focus chemistry: atoms as waves that can focalize; the foci
imitate the charge of atoms, thus can effect the energetics of physical molecules, this could link or implement a parabola-focus energy workalike functioning as a halogen or other atom, to physically, chemically modify the reactivity of an actual
molecule, the shape of a protein or the activity of a neuron). This could possibly be created at things other than neural tissue creating new technologies as well as modifications to existing technologies like semiconductors. Another possibility is that
I perceive wikipedia says time crystals (plural rotating energy states as non-static least-energy configuations of atom groups) have been physically produced; these looping systems could loop through CFG UQE chronological and physical span adjusting
automata, producing large, durable, technologically customizable UQE, which Dave thinks are causative of sentience. So a time crystal chemistry could be a non neural source of sentience to make artificial intelligence from.

Thinking of atom parabolas with an artifical blob that has the charge characteristics of an actual atom without there being an actual atom there: Perhaps imitation carbon, or some nifty, even more plurally-attaching electric charge than carbon variation
(say 20 “-“ links per virtual atom), could form polyatomic molecules; like a virtual phenyl, or a virtual dopamine, or a virtual RNA, or new hyperplural carbon-like virtual molecules or, possibly macromolecules. These could be a new kind of organic
chemistry because they could do more, new, different things than the existing elements in combination. technologies that build chemical systems, or even possibly artificial intelligence technological generating objects could have even more possible
engineerable variations.

Is it possible to produce parabola-like virtual atom cofocalizers at something other than solid matter? Various gases can be spin-polarized, and spin polarized things might exhibit something like magnetic sorting or arrangement; It is just possible that
spin-modified laser-zapped gases in a big magnet could produced ordered parabola-like virtual atom generators. A virtual atom environment as widely spaced as a gas could have enhanced chemical activity, and permit more virtual atoms to be next to each
other for making virtual atom molecules.

a semi-aqueous virtual atom parabola, or other shape might be producible with something like a lipid layer or bilayer. A regularly spaced grid, with somethinglike metal atoms at it as part of lipid layer or bilayer might be moisture-stable. A laser
immobilization field could possibly cause a big million times million or billion times billion array of metal atoms at a lipid layer or lipid bilayer grid of molecules to be constrained as to place and position. That would make a large-surface area
virtual atom technological structure.

Water has a possibility of being arrangeable into virtual-atom producing structures or shapes. A laser immobilization field could possibly cause a big million times million or billion times billion array of water molecules to be constrained as to place
and position, they would then be placed in parabolas or other shapes to produce virtual atoms to make things with and do chemistry.

Ladder or staircase polymers: The sides of the ladder, or triladder, or quadro-ladder each have an atom on them, then the atoms cofocalize to make an assemblage of virtual atoms that can be used at an actual produced technology. The custom shapes of
proteins, as well as their predictable mechanism-like motions, notably some I have seen at cytological biological systems, could be used to make virtual atom assemblages and even do things like swing them together or hold them at adjustable lengths from
each other to make things, that is, technology objects. Things like virtual atom technology proteins could go along with circular-gap graphene stacked sheets as things that can produce stuff.

Photovoltaic or semiconductor or custom band gap material made from cofocalized virtual atoms: can you change the bandgap of an existing semiconductor if you project a virtual atom onto it, or its surface? Another possibility is making an entire new
semiconductor completely out of virtual atoms Notably, at images I have seen, virtual atoms are produced with near 20-40 actual atoms at a parabola; 40 atoms is many many orders of magnitudes less atoms to make something out of, a possible path to
eentsier computer and artificial intelligence parts. Could virtual atom cofocalization produced semiconductors have greater stability than actual element-made semiconductor crystals, beneficially effecting structural and performance variability and
possibly making them warmth nondegrading? Perhaps an atom parabola or other shape attached to a graphene grid, possibly a monolayer, or a stack of monolayers, could have greater warmth stability. Also, 40 metal atoms attached to the carbons at graphene
might be less warmth-wiggly. One possibility is lithium with its 1 unit of charge, another possibility is deuterium, as the higher mass of the deuterium form of hydrogen, noting hydrogen likes to attach to carbon, like graphene, might be less wiggly as
well.

The graphene grid could have big action-spaces or holes in it: So if you think of a graphene grid, with cofocalizing atoms on it having the virtual atom be at a place where the graphene grid had a big, possibly circular, 40 sided circle gap hole, then
the virtual atom would be free-floating, and able to be next to other virtual atoms, or even effect other molecules that drift through the 40 sided hole. That produces a custom reaction and building space with virtual atoms. A vertical | virtual-atom
polymer could be constructed in a stack of 40 atom hole graphene monolayers.

Obvious to say, but virtual atoms from things like parabolas or other shapes could be effected from externally applied charge or proton movement (protontronic charge) that might make them brighter, less overbearing, or more stationary to benefit
reactivity, positional stability, Plasmonics would be a technologically more sophisticated way of doing things with virtual atoms that uses electrons or protons to enhane, improve, and create new effects from virtual atoms.

Could cofocalizing virtual atom producing parabolas or other shapes be produced from phonons or other plasmonic structures at STP? A migrating or standing plasmonic structure that cofocalizes atoms and electrons as waves could make virtual atoms like
virtual halogens of virtual carbons that could possibly be electronically or protonically moved around, causing control of the chemistry and electrical characteristics of the virtual atoms. You couldmove stuff around, which could go well with atom-sized
manufacturing. Could a plasmonic virtual atom-migrating technological object do nanoassembler activities?

Could a virtual atom sturalized coating or layer on a photovoltaic cause charge optimization to either improve electron migration or photon absorption. A ladder polymer or graphene coated surface, or something like laser etched, texture of virtual atoms
could heighten phovoltaic efficiency. Similarly other things that generate electricity might benefit. Perhaps virtual atoms could affect the magnetic characteristics of a material.

Electrets (things like permanent locational charge materials or polymers) are a known thing, so parabolas-or other shape that generate virtual atoms could be made from electret materials. These could be stronger, more effective, higher reactivity,
purposefully optimized reactivity, or notably durable versions of virtual atom technology materials. Perhaps it is possible to populate the surface of graphene, or modify a protein or ladder molecule so it is an electret, then graphene and protein,
ladder molecule virtual atom technologies could have higher and durable energy. I do not know where electrets get their energy, I perceive I read that non-zero warmth causes atoms to have electrons above the ground state, so it is possible ambient STP
or even cooler could keep the energy up and available at an electret virtual atom technology or chemical effector, even though it was interacting with other atoms or virtual atoms. Than contrasts with piezoelectric plastics and ceramics which, I perceive,
happen when molecules or crystals respond to squeeziness or new molecule position to cause bunched up electrons.

If Dave’s theory of “schoedinger’s neurons” has value, or if adjusting the UQE interval or physical span has effects regardless of Dave’s idea, there could even be new drugs that effect the quantum superposition UQE interval of tissues, cytes,
like neurons, or proteins. Just as measurable things, perhaps not effect forecast from theory, or with Dave’s idea, these could have new medical effects or modify thoughts arising at a human, that is person, or people’s brains/CNS actual physical
brain or at an AI technology object. An MWI active drug.

What happens when you put an electret layer under or on top of a semiconductor? Permanent bias at a transistor?
Easy-trigger custom bandgaps, from partial pre-loading of electrons, (or I suppose things like their tunneling or availability, or blobby HOMO graphic of charge-at-molecule adjustments) at light emitters and photovoltaics? Non-polymer chemical vapor
depositable electrets could enhance semiconductor technology.

“DSP circuits, such as finite-impulse-response filters with fixed coefficients, you can build constant-multipliers which multiply by a constant” makes me think there are amazing sort of analog, but possibly digital, IC circuits out there that
multiply something with a coefficient. What is a way you could multiply something with (the coefficient) at an IC? I am thinking it is likely a square wave encoded thing that is being multiplied, otherwise you could just use a transistor or op-amp, but
the idea of a dedicated multiplier made of semiconductors that is nonlooping, that is not a turing machine, is entertaining. I have no idea how it would work. Maybe if you do something wild like XOR (or some more actual thing) the first three bits you
can do predictable doubling or halving, then progressively double or half the number-containing byte-word as fractional diminishing fractions (like 1-1/2 -1/4-1/8 from sequential xoring) to get a new number that is multiplied with an arbitrarily sculpted
number that is the coefficient. The sequential XORing, if the coefficient was fized and known, could be a in-semiconductor ladder of sequential XORs (1-1/2-1/4-1/8-1/16 etc) made out of little lines at a semiconductor to create a physical coefficient
multiplier of digital data, as compared with a CPU-style turing machine looping thing.

.5B Children’s nootropics: well, they could test the various racetam nootropics on mice to see if any of them live longer from the human “more education causes better healthspan and lifespan” https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1468-
0009.12372 correlations being supported with a control including study on mice. It could be that being nootropic fed your entire life makes you live longer and be healthier; if it works at mice, then that, with the human correlation, and the actual
measured lifetime and healthspan of the mice compared to controls could cause the racteams and other nootropics to be a positively additive beneficial variant on: measures of safety; and so recommended as a health, wellness, and cognitive thing for
human physiological children to take and do.

Also, the mouse data might vary as to the improved healthspan and longevity with each different nootropic molecule, that would cause certain nootropics to be preferable for human physiological children’s use.

If nootropics make mice weller and longer lived, possibly from the education effect they could use localized versions, like antibody linked, or high AMU polyglycine linked (does not pass the blood brain barrrier) racetam nootropics to concentrate the
nootropics outside the CNS,or at specific organs and tissues, to see if the different ones had any different effects on healthspan. It might find organ systems, which when their neurons are more/differently active, work better. That might find wellness
or longevity producing nootropic molecules, usable as drugs, which omitting a CNS education effect, still heighten wellness and have longevity effects.

A paper says, “Although it is well established that educational attainment improves health and longevity” https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1468-0009.12372

The beneficial effects of education on longevity and healthspan might be concentratable and increasable with isolating and studying actual education content and education-environment variables like area of education, classes taken, or major, and
electives and possibly education style, like homework completed or educational software hours used, as well as things like dorm residence and recreation activities at college and high school, and possibly at younger ages as well.

Pondering the effect of education on younger ages, it is possible that although almost everyone goes to elementary school, that the trends noted at high school students elective activity could produce data on which areas of interest, and their practice,
increase longevity and healthspan; it is possible math classes might have high correlations with greater lifespan and healthspan, so perhaps kindergarten could be enriched with logic based on the measurement that studying logic provides lifetime
longevity and healthspan benefits at the lifetime of high school and college students. At kindergarten activities like “what things go together, with physical venn diagrams, putting blue and green people and green and blue trees on different venn
diagram play boards where one has intersection of people and blue, and another has green and trees, and the kindergarteners being able to point out,possibly with personal entertainment and amusement, things that “can’t make sense” when a set of
characteristics or postulates is given first. Lewis Carrol might be on to something with the entertainment and puzzles Alice, of Alicein wonderland pondered.

Just thinking about college majors they might find that Math classes correlate with longevity and healthspan notably when wealth increase from the math’s enabling lucrative majors is compensated for. Similarly, they might find that sociability in
college, causing more rememberable occurences of what has been called “the college experience” has correlation to longevity and healthspan when also factor compensated for extroversion. Perhaps living in the dorms and going to a mid range quantity
of parties, rather than few parties or lots of parties, is measurably correlatable as physiologically beneficial throughout the lifetime.

If they find school educational and activity things that transfer well from college versions to high school versions, perhaps specific area college healthspan and lifespan benefitting activity correlations could be used to improve high school and junior
high school as well as elementary school with study subjects and activities that heighten longevity and healthspan copied from university.

Although occasional spurious correlations at the components of education and school-lifestyle, are math of probability predictable, it is possible area-specific correlations of longevity and healthspan from what things are studied, how much homework is
accomplished or the amount of educational software modules that are accomplished, and also social activities that are often linked to educational environments could guide some of people’s voluntary educational activities.
engineering, chemistry, computer ic, computer fab, longevity, longevity technology, treon, treon verdery, physics, lasers, laser, emiconductor, dimension, math, IT, IL, pattern resonance, time travel, chronotechnology, circile, eric the circle, cartoon,
healthspan, youthspan, cpi, manufacturing, fiscal, money, software, petroleum, archive at deviantart com user treonsebastia

All technologies, ideas, and inventions of Treon Sebastian Verdery are public domain at JUly 8,2023AD and previously, as well as after that date

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)