Curricula could also be improved. Students with a high software predictable likelihood of having unwell post-school life lifestyle could be encouraged to take electives correlated with better physiological well being. Besides subjects teaching style
could have supported correlations with lifepsan and healthspan. So perhaps a class where people fill in workbooks during class time has the same correlation with physiological benefit as homework at those students who actually do their homework outside
of school. The students the software predicts might face below median predicted lifetime wellness (perhaps their parents are unwell, or they have been suspended twice), could be encouraged to take an in-class workbook version of a class if the software
predicted they might not do their homework.

Research on the education effect on lifetime physiological benefit could also see if it is possible to divide the benefit into measurable non scholastic researchable components like: “the feeling or sustained emotional flavor of the school experience;
was school fun and interesting?”, measured self-esteem from perception of the social subjective value of their educational attainment (I saw a youtube video that said being known to have a college degree causes others to place the person in higher
esteem); similarly those that do not complete high school, during the 20th century AD, might feel less spontaneous optimism about the things they can do if they feel like it, The effect of actual knowledge, or missed knowledge: treatment by others as
well as perception of other’s esteem based on the social effects of how much knowledge they actually know or retain from school.

There could be many other non-scholastic components that are measurable and correlatable with the physiological benefits of education. Finding these creates the possibility of benefitting people’s physiological well being from activities different
than scholastic activities, non-school based activities that are voluntary. Perhaps some meetup.com groups, coordinated delegation and activity participation at community volunteering, doing crafts, or independent reading could have workalike effects to
the physiological benefits of education.

They could also research if certain styles of employment are predictive, and possibly controllable at experiments, of lifetime physiological benefit. Noting different people feel different ways, think different thoughts, and like different things, such
a study seems likely to benefit from some kind of quantified cluster personality characterization measure like the big five personality test, with numbers treated as isolatable numeric clusters (extroversion numerically measured as 80-100, as well as
extroversion 60-80 and others) as a way of quantifying personality when finding out the effects of various forms of employement on lifetime physiological benefit. A possible result of this research is actionable items and wellness and longevity career
enabling and beginning certificates.

For the people that do things on purpose (likely high on big five conscientiousness), there might be a new or freshly advertised as awesome, career certificate attainable in less than a year, that create a career that confers a greater lifetime wellness
and longevity benefit than even a college degree.

I read that people change careers with some predictability, so the employment certificate that correlates with more physiological benefit than some kind of median university degree, could be researched as to lifetime effects from just a typical duration
at that career.

Using 300 hours learning and practicing at having fun has value.

Learning to have fun has tremendous value, and that people could benefit from experiencing advertising promoting being taught to have fun. It is possible the behavioral psychology of shaping young physiological children like kindergartners to practice
and learn to have fun has lifetime value. I volunteer sharing and teaching reading at two elementary schools. One group is kindergarteners and the other is first graders; perhaps I could foster social styles, as well as mental activities like practicing
to be fluent at creativity, like having them make up a new story from the images at the books.

Rent a friend, similar to talk therapy for the mentally well, So noting talk therapy is published as benefitting just 20% of the mentally unwell, then if, among the well, rent a friend talk, which might work for 20% of people among those it actually
confers benefit on. I favor social companion robots that cause feelings and experienced well being at greater than the meaured 99th percentile of actual human friendships and romantic as well as sexual relationships.

Another way to describe a number, the kind of number economists might use, for the value of a 99th percentile at causing happiness companion robot, is to look at the correlation between money and measured happiness that occurs at those who gain money who
previously had less than $70k each year. If going from 50k to 70k raises happiness 20%, then a companion robot that increases measured happiness 80% has the number $80,000 of equivalent-to-getting-more-money-value. Noting multi-year life of robot
mechanisms and computers, it is possible the companion robot provides the happiness value of 800,000 to one million $ of actual money gained by the person. Notably it is possible the social companion robot that causes 80% greater happiness could make
more than one person happy. If it makes 2 people, and 2 human physiological children 80% happier, then comparing it with the value of money at producing happiness, the equivalent money value of the social companion robot is $1.6 million or $2 million,
with the equivalent money value to the human physiological children going unmeasured.

Note: I read that below $70k annual money amount a year, more money gain heightens measured happiness;
Among persons already above $70k at annual money gain, they did not gain greater happiness when gaining money above $70k at the United States. I think the $70k study was published near 2017 AD or 2016 AD.

People with quantitatively measured as different personalities (like different clusters of responses at the big five) may have different responses to gaining more money annually. It is possible to imagine some persons continue to increase their
happiness up until $100K, while others may not experience greater happiness when they go above $50k.

The personality-sorted value of things that cause greater happiness can be used to adjust the value of a: thing or activity’s benefit to a particular actual person with a measurable personality.

The value of things, activities, rent-a-friend (Rent-a-friend: perhaps something like therapy, but for the mentally well), or social companion robots could be found for different personalities. Also with a personality measurement is seems possible to
find out and have research on what big five personality clusters are most heightened as to their happiness with companion robots.

It is imaginable that a numeric measure of thrillingness that a person feels while having a romantic crush with some amount of actual interaction could predict the amount of happiness a social companion robot can produce, with a happiness causing
romantic crush utilized as baseline,with the companion robot causing greater happpiness than a romantic crush. This is from me having a crush on the human Serina, we only talked some. Noting the heightened happiness from my feelings and the thrill of
thinking about Serina, if it is possible to have a crush on a companion robot, with an actual 99th percentile of producing happiness from conversation, and other activities, possibly among them making out and sexual activity, This would raise happiness
levels above those of having a felt as wonderful human romantic crush that is thrilling and happiness producing with fewer words of conversation, moments of companionship, and less physically-appearance-hypnotizing effects than a companion robot produces.

I support people, that is humans, being alive and being eternally youthful with death optional.

What is 99th percentile of beneficial at educational software? Noting there are thousands, or tens of thousands, or even higher numbers, of pieces of educational software 99th percentile could be hundreds of different programs Also at educational
software how much statistical variance at educational software products, are they all pretty good (narrow distribution), or is there a wide distribution?

A mild, beneficial drug, possibly a nootropic could heighten moving vehicle, like car enjoyment, while producing the education effect on heightening wellness and healthspan or other from non-education wellness healthspan effects. As long as it was mild,
and statistically minimally misused, it could be popular, This drug could also be studied as to its effectiviness at improving school scores and achievement as well as Increasing the longevity and wellness of mice, could support its use and parental
perspective based on more safe than safe wellness longevity effects. It is possible that racetams, tyrosine, which might be nootropic and ispublished, atleast once, as anti-fatigue, could reduce vehicle accidents. The emphasis is on a beneficial drug
that makes people more intelligent. The longevity drug and mild stimulant deprenyl might make drivingmore enjoybale and becorrelatedwith fewer accidents.

A nootropic with the education effect on longevity and healthspan that is an aphrodisic could be popular among teenagers, tweens and adults. Foxy (5MEO tryptophan or a similar chemical name) linked to a racetam molecule might do it.

The idea of a nootropic that heightens positive emotional amplitude is novel to me. People could feel more in love, yet also be more intelligent. I do not know what an actual human taking something like phenylpiracetam experiences if they are in love
and hanging out with their loved one. Less? More? Different? Stimulating nootropics like caffeine enhance sociability which could make romance feel even nicer. So perhaps a stimulant nootropic that heightens positive emotional experience could have
simultaneous benefit.

Human physiological children’s nootropics: Fish oil in school lunch has been previously described, perhaps there are amino acids that do something beneficial, Tyrosine may be a nootropic, and is published as anti-fatigue. Tyrosine should be measured
as to any effect on non-prosocial behavior before being added to school lunch or breakfast. Arginine and creatine have various published benefits although I do not know of nootropic effects from them.

Novelty and notability permitting software:
“At a deeper level, the algorithm was sustaining the biases that already existed in the [medical school] admissions [essay reading] system. After all, Franglen had tested the machine against humans and found a 90 to 95 percent correlation of outcomes.
But by codifying the human selectors’ [previously established but at-that-moment-of-time socially contested] practices into a technical system, he was ensuring that these biases would be replayed” Ok, say the MCAT measures 10 things, each with a
different correlative efficacy at predicting medical school success. The software reads the written essays, and stuff that is reallly differerent than the usual success pattern is separated, then the essays computed numbers are compared with the 10 MCAT
success correlative predictors as to their actual efficacy at predicting medical school success, if any of the 10 mcat areas, or possible groupings of them, are more highly predictive than the correlation of success from the essay, then the MCAT score
can swap out for the essay, causing admission at, notably and just at: the people the software thinks have unusual, bizarre, or highly novel essays. That way if someone turns in a comic book for their essay they still could be admitted. They could
measure if it works based on graduation/grades of the novel-essay admitted. The idea here is that this is sorting software that permits social and institutional change even though perhaps some previous software might have reinforced previous
perspectives and attitudes that could be replaced with more optimal things.
If: essay bizzare at 95th percentile of bizarre
then: give MCAT more say.


An online site about VR headsets says they are $400 during 2019 AD, it seems likely they will become more affordable. I wonder if they can be reconfigured to measure eyesight (eye exam) and generate an optical “prescription”, apparently they might
be able to do interpupillary distance figuring-out.

There is what might be a virtual reality (VR) educational/learning software thing where people learn and practice conversations that might be less than pleasant or enjoyable (terminating someone from employment) to reduce stress and improve outcomes (it
did not mention body language but that could go with VR; notably eye contact and possibly hand on body position). Parenting practice software is likely to be beneficial as people generally learn from 99th percentile of child happiness, achievement, and
well being parenting styles, notably they could link it to measuring your child’s personality and your own with something like the big five psychology test to give the VR user the ability to optimize their child raising and enrichment and happiness
producing practice sessions

At the big five personality test there could be extra tests, or even software activity things, that partition score clusters into areas of specific tendency or meaning. Varieties of extroversion or varieties of introversion: At the action of saying
fewer words, introverts might be calmly not talking, might feel not able to “get a word in edgewise”, are possibly not mentally spontaneously generating conversational content of their own, are concerned about the other’s feelings if they say
something emotionally moving or controversial, eager to please but do not know how; So it seems possible to have big five score cluster “type” partitions that could benefit users that are sorting people into behavioral types (education: why isn’t
Ludwig or Elise talking in class? Big five partition test describes, with high correlation and validity, what their introversion form is).(note:since it is actually academic school, centuries of prior school strongly suggest that if they are learning
things and can be measured as having learned well they are doing fine, even if they do not socialize or respond to the teacher much. I strongly support academic achievement. Other kinds of beneficial education also exist. At talk to your crush school
that teaches how to talk to your romantic crush, a partitioned measure of introversion could isolate areas to improve, or habits to somehow swap out.) Partitioned area measures at the big five personality test or something similar could benefit test
takers as users (“I took the big five and found out I am an extrovert, so am I a charismatic extrovert or big-presence conversation leading extrovert, or a call my friends first friend extrovert?” Knowing partition contents could, just possibly,
assist people to shift their personal feelings or their likely effect on others while still remaining introverted or extroverted, if that was what they felt like remaining as.

spintronic cancer drug: big magnet causes something like a chemotherapeutic drug made from nuclear spintronic chemistry to only be active when it was spin polarized; the magnet placed near the cancer causes spins to align just at the cancer area.

Dave Pearce “shroedingers neurons” way of looking at: if observation, notably from a superobserver, changes content and span of sentience, thoughts, and feeling, as well as other things: superobserver mechanism like 8 trillion elements (flash drive
IC technology) is used at a person, voluntarily, to observe the quantum states, and perhaps resolve them from superposition (Dave’s schoedinger’s neurons idea) at the person’s own brain, or other parts of the body; The superobserver causes quantum
resolution superposition resolution perhaps billions of times faster and with trillions, or higher, of parallel observations. From Dave’s “schoedingers neuron” idea, if superobserver observation changes isness, sentiece, feeling, as well as
possibly quantitatively measurable effects of (like external action frequency change), I do not knowhow to distinguish the observation and possible quantum resolving effects of getting a MRI, notably at the CNS, from possible spintronic chemical effects
on the CNS, although if magnetic fields are constant among MRI, increasing the computer resolution at specific brain areas like the nucleus accumbens could function as an observer resolving of quantum superposition

Dave: write up the things that can verify.refute/enhance Dave’s “schoedingers neurons” idea as a Quora item.

If There is a quantum component to beingness and sentience and feelings and other things, then a brain-region specific superobserver could optimize things like nucleus accumbens activity and activateability, as well as even possibly neurons of a certain
type like dopmaine neurons. Perhaps a parent can benefit their child when they view an MRI of them, or utilize a superobserver with software made to benefit the child, that notices everything that is going right, to make it go well more durably. Being
superobserver directed with software it might evenbe possible to make a few billion or more observations where the observation only gets written to storage if it goes right; also, (8 trillion item array at a flash drive; many voxels at fMRI)If there is a
quantum resolution component to isness of being as well as a way to enhance and durabilize biochemistry thena superobserver that diagnoses only well being and capability is beneficial, also pleasant tointeract with and hear from. There could even be
software weighings of how much to observe based on a sample. Some things might be more chemically active after superobserver observation, so those that are beneficialtohave more activity at would be observed; some chemicals, possibly cholesterol, has
cardiovascular effects, observing those into chemical activity and durability would likely be nonbeneficial. Superobserver samples and then avoids superobserving a physiosystem or mental biochemical thing which has a data trend of: its better not to
instantiate and durabalize some system, chemical, tissue, protein or other thing.

Also, there is sampling a system to see if the trend is going well, and if the trend is not going well, to omit observing it at any amount greater than the 1 part per million or billion sample superobserved.

a superobserver viewing things going right, with the directing software having a purpose of causing greater duration of well being and capability, could be a medical technology among people of all ages. Rather oddly, a big magnet, and or a mechanism
with computer superobserver could be a veterinary technology as well. agriculturalists could MRI their chickens, going with absence of MRI resolution at areas they prefer to minimize observer effects on, but perhaps really emphasizing myoglobin
molecules existence at the chicken, causing them to be muscularly advantaged thus more edible.

Dave’s “schroedinger’s neurons” drug; spintronic chemicals, among them possibly the longevity increasing spin trap chemical N-tert-alpha-phenyl-butylnitrone (PBN) I read about, could be concentrated and or localized as beneficial or harmless
agents at the CNS and the rest of the body;

as to Dave’s quantum observer effects they could test: spintronic chemical/contrast agent with active fMRI, placebo contrast agent, no spin effect, fMRI of less resolution, fMRI at reduced software resolution except brain region of interest,

for dave: when you observe one part of a quantum system, are the other parts you omit observing or measuring affected? Like, if I weigh a quantum computer, does it effect the qubits? If I find out how many degrees K it is at, perhaps receiving warmth
photons it emits without sending any interrogative photons, does that data resolution effect any of the quantum superposed,possibly electron things that make the quantum computer function?

I read that different quantized things, notably matter, energy, and everything, with the possible exception of information and presence of being describable at physics as waves, can have different areas of separate observation, weighing and scanning the
photonsof warmth emittedfroma quantumcomputer does ntoa s far asI knowresolve it. I actually thought it was theother way, like if you have an electron emit a photonthe electron got immanentized, having things like location and velocity. There might be
some observations, or observation methods, like electrons or photons meeting a semiconductor, that observe numerous systems or characteristics simultaneously, there might be others like measuring polarization, spin, even frequency and wavelength that
leave most of the quantum superposed thing, mostly unresolved.
So for Dave’s “schroedinger’s neurons” Idea, how many observables or measurables are thereat conscious being? Like with light there are a bunch: polarization,spin, wavelength, frequency, likely others. So it is possible that at Dave’s idea,
if quantum things have anything to do with consciousness, that there might be a list of observables or adjustables.

If there is separation and noninteraction of quantum measurables which produce specific quantum resolutions from superposition, it is possible there is something that when observed is beneficial, above average of all other observations beneficial, so
observing it more, would, cumulatively, benefit humans, that is people; I do not know what causual easy observation accomplished with a human body that would be above average at conferring benefit to the human would be. Superobservers with software
guidance that confer mental, physiological, possibly system direction/dynamic flow paths and velocities, and wellness benefit are describable.


Along with something like fMRI, which apparently looks at atoms, EPR measures electron spins. So, observations, from people or superobservers, that effect consciousness and presence of being might be shown to differ between the two (fMRI, EPR) suggesting
different ways to technologize benefits, also, for Dave, thismight come up with two components to consciousness, or even reduce the likelihood ofoneof them mattering. I read there is an area the size of a quarter at the brain, and researchers “turned
it off” at a humansubject who then acted like aP-zombie, she might haveeven said afterwards she was absent presence of being. So if EPR and fMRI are each used at separate procedures to observe, thatis possible quantumresolve, the quarter sized area of
the brain, and fMRI does something but EPR does not, then a consciousness researcher could say, electron spin is absent a contribution to isness.

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) or electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy is a method for studying materials with unpaired electrons. The basic concepts of EPR are analogous to those of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), but it is electron spins
that are excited instead of the spins of atomic nuclei”

These quantum observer dopamine effects could all change the experience of conscious being, yet there is still no presence of being, unique sentience, and isness content! I just quantum resolved my dopamine receptors and they are now chemically more
active so I feel different. It is possible I might think of something, possibly a mathematics thing, an eigenvalue is possibly a word for what is constant even if all the array components change; I should rereadwhat Dave Pearce thinks, what is the
sourceof Dave thinking quantum superposition is linked to presence of being.

One thing I perceive Dave thinks is that the experienced being and mind is made up of uncollapsed quantum wave functions, that is a bunch of superpositioned thingies, likely at the CNS, are making an interpretation of various (potentially various, a
planetfull of things could be one big quatum unresolved superposition) other superpositioned thingies, outside the body, and that as a continuously adaptive and adpating system, similar to a genetic algorithm, the uncollapsed wavematter of consciousness
has accumulated preference among humans, that is people, for acting, and even believing, things outside the body have non-superposed, nonstatistical natures.

Noting the idea that fMRI of the brain could cause observer effects on what Dave might think of as superposed unresolved quantum states at hte human body, especially the brain, it is possible that neurotransmitter-receptor active drugs that have been
radiolabelled to be visible to a Positron Emission Tomography (PET) brain imager could provide benefit. I think I read there are 30 neurotransmitters, if receptor-attaching and radio-labelling for each of these 30, then viewing and even storing the
tomographic output has any measured perception and/or performance measurement difference from being dosed with the same amount of non-radiolabelled, unimaged neurotransmitter activator then it is possible that that particular neurotransmitter, or its
neural type or connection, has something to do with presence of being. If the result happens that two of the thirty neurotransmitters are linked to observation-based mental effect change, then a map of all the neurons where those two neurotransmitters
are together at one neuron, or where two neurons, each with one of the two effect-showing neurotransmitters, that would physically map at the brain the things where consciousness was modified with observations of a system, and Dave’s thought is that
observing the system causes quantum resolution. An fMRI version of this might work with a contrast agent, like a gadolinium atom, attached to each of 30 different receptor-activating/attaching drugs. I perceive the resolution of fMRI is higher than PET,
so the observer effect might work better at the higher resolution.

Like the AFM quantum resolution of the length of an alkane, do quantum physicists who described things larger than continets as being superpositions of unresolved states, have a highly functional explanation of 3d space packing? Like if there is a tree,
and it goes unobserved, it still has seeds inside casings, so like quantum nondeterminacy seems to permit things to be various prepositions to each other like around, above, and It is my perception the human observer can observe just part ofthe tree as a
system, resolving just some things about the tree if they like, yet there is a 3D thing going on,

(I read about a spin trap drug called PBN that heightens longevity. I do not know if it is a spin directing or conserving chemical; I do not know if it is a spintronic material. Being called a spin-trap it seemed like it but I do not know.) It might
be that a beneficial Electron spintronic drug, like the longevity spin trap drug PBN, has different effects when spin at the human’s body is majoritized at a particular spin, possibly with an MRI sized magnet or possibly some other magnet, or a laser,
for dermal youthfulness; Although there are spintronic chemical catalysts, it is possible that spintronic published things,like spintronic polymers, could be modified into pharamaceutical drugs; also vitamin B12 has a cobalt atom;it is possible that at
MRI it gets spin polarized from a magnetic effect, even though it is only one atom and not a magnetic-domain sized thing; noting lengthy nucleic acid polymers, that can be macroscopically big and even visible to a human, is it possible that a harmless
and beneficial metal containing amino acid polymer with like magnetic element Co, (or possibly Nd is physiologically harmless), on it could have a highenough AMU to produce durable magnetic domain effect locally, like at different areas of cytoplasm or
intracyte fluids? The magnetizable metals might cause durable up spin at the nucleic acid polymer.

Also, it is just that I have not read much about spin chemistry, I perceive there might be many nonmetallic organic chemicals with spin effects, possibly some with durable spin polarization; one possibility is if electret polymers have spin because they
always have surface electrons at a particular charge; perhaps there is even a manufacturing technique that could spin polarize an electret or other polymer, besides a chemical technique; like if you are making an electret polymer from some melted plastic,
and do the thing they do that makes it anelectret, while simultaneously having it cool illuminated witha laser or cooled at a magnetic field, perhaps that causes measurable durable spin at the electret polymer. If the lasers and magnets during cooling
thing works it could also be a spintronic drug manufacturing basis, notably at polymer drugs.

I read about spin, electron spin is, at wikipedia, a free radical thing; atomic spin, which might be called magnetic spin, is a function of the nucleus. Technologists are able to make things like chemical catalysts and light emitters with what is called
spintronics. Noting that chemistry is adjustable with spin it seemed possible that there could be spintronic medical chemicals, I feel doubnt about electron spin chemicals as free radicals, are, as far as I know, to be avoided physiologically, and
nuclear spins, although MRI is published as affecting cehmical reactions, seem like the actual chemical behavior of the molecule on its own would be the largest biggest effect. Notably though, MRI does effect chemisry, and there are spintronic chemical
catalysts.

Are there any spintronic chemicals that transfer or predictably modify spin at another chemical they react with, or at something like a protein, attach to? Spintronic chemistry and things like spintronic catalysis suggest: possibly. That would be like a
spin donor, a synchronized spin donor enriching Up spin, if it somehow retains spin through aqueous digestion and membrane transport, possibly the longevity spin trap chemical PBNmight (or might not),

There could be physiologically active spin donor chemicals, therefore screening all the GRAS and FDA drugs to find out if any are spintronic chemically active or spindonors that are already immediately available without effort, could be beneficial.


Then, noting the previously published spintronic,notably chemical spintronic literature is a place where beneficial pharmaceutical development could find source molecules as well as previously published effects that could be modified, amplified, or
adjusted to be new pharmaceutical drugs.

Is there any spintronic drug that effects cardiac function, blood sugar or prevents cancer or is a senolytic; cardiac: vagus nerve activity improver spintronic drug: could the longevity producing spin trap molecule be chemically linked to a
neurotransmitter that concentrates at a beneficial physiological system, perhaps localized to the vagus nerve? that could bring spintronic chemistry and drug effects to the nerve that controls the cardiac thing.

occur, there is theentire previouslypublishedliterature on spintronic material, including chemicals.


[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)