[continued from previous message]

So there are some ways to computationally enhance or improve things like this thing I just described; ways to create a high ground from which to do something like ray tracing. There might be some mathematical value to just making a highest point; you
could just think you know what you are doing and go with one vantage point with a Y value twice as high as any noted at the dataset. Then a person that knowsmore mathematics than I do can use this to do things like analog string-sort, lift everything,
cover with liquid helium, or, dare to sometimes simplify to logic and shakeout a net

As a concept, that then gets described as a technology: Cheap liquid helium clings and flows faster all over the city and mountains and although a non-analog computed point cloud could map the topology; a possibly-instantaneous if the ICs support it: the
amount and location of the liquid helium is analog-amount-mapped with a spectrography (helium noticing) laser with a wide illumination laser, possibly the spectrography instrument projects a a detailed smooth gradient (ramping) hologram everywhere all at
once, or, less optimally, a planar scan laser rastering the helium covered landscape; then the results, or rather analog form-stream (urge is to just say data, but it is analog rather than digital so form stream is the word sequence) of the mass analog
simultaneous chromatographic detection of concentration of liquid helium are optically-like concentrated (collimated/DCX lens) onto a thing that finds a sort of non-viewed/viewing optional map of saturation (the amount of liquid helium) then with an
amplitude filter, the filter causes the maxima and minima to separate/be isolated from the rest of the analog information (like data but analog) coming through the collimater/DCX, and then the person or software or AI using the system has found the
actual maxima and minima of the entire topological map.

So technologically, at an early 21st century data set that is digital, which might be supplanted with some new kind of analog data representations, methods and technologies, what is the computer equivalent to pouring liquid helium onto the landscape?
New integrated circuits could do non-digital plural averaging and quite possibly analog forms of things that simulate physics. Some circuits could be based on flash drive quantum tunneling

Flash memory during 2019 AD, I perceive, had little containers with a plenum that electrons could tunnel through. It seems possible that coating the sides of those multibillion flash drive containers with a conductor, or an electret would change the
shape of the electron distribution at each flashdrive unit object container;

If you think of coating the sides of the flash drive container unit object with a shape of conductor or electret, or micropatterning it like wallpaper, then each flash drive container unit can have something like a bulb shape on the container side or
maxi-pad looking tennis ball parts that might combine to (have one larger than a single container) predictable cause an electron cloud shape across two unit containers or at an atrium; side coatings, wallpaper, and shapes on flash drives, analog flash
drive effect, that might, or might not combine tomake geometrics that have consistenct or constructive way of “saying” a topological form or having a statistical profile of a material, like liquid helium. The coatings on the flash drive container
sides and/or wallpaper and/or gradient slope plenum dividers do analog workaliketoliquid helium.
also the electron detecting side of the plenum could be analog rather than a 2019 AD 1/0 digit reporter

analog interactions, besides arising from custom flash drive container sides could be things like atriums, Hub and radiants, token ring networks, possibly even re-send-until arrives (TCP/IP like) geometries could be produced with semiconductor technology.
People that are better at mathematics andcomputer science than I am could possibly describe parsimonious physical analog networks and container shapes and wallpaper that combine well to represent things; notably this might have some nifty geometry
things like “kite and dart” penrose tiling, possibly networked.

There is a 1 terabyte quantum tunneling storage memory card so that is 8 trillion flash drive containers that are mass produced on an (or a thin stack) IC at 2019 AD; Note that this reshaping of quantum tunneling flash drive geometriesis different than
the 2019 AD use ofthe word quantum computing


Artificial high ground math algorithms: I read about a thing where you get some branched strings, flip them twice, then it autosorts to find thelongest continuous path at the bundle of string; I perceive a person who is functional with mathematics can
do this to an analog mesh representation of a group of data or a topology map, or with analog computing, an analog thing representation (like data only analog)

lift effect; analog simultaneously lift all to the height of the highest actual feature; distance or energy to lift describes minima / maxima; to find the other minima/maxima just down then lift up.

tennis ball parts; shapes on flash drives, analog flash drive effect, that might, or might not combine tomake geometrics that have consistenct or constructive way of “saying” a topological form or having a statistical profile of a material, like
liquid helium. The coatings on the flash drive container sides and/or wallpaper and/or gradient slope plenum dividers do analog workaliketoliquid helium.


This seems to cause a perceptual thing where a person might think, is the resolution of the analog system the same as a digital characterization? At certain sytems it is possible that the physics-like behavior of the material the town and mountain are
made out of brackets function without digitization; if you know, or the model permits, something like a statement like “a pile of minerals of a certain height and width if stacked higher than N units tall has a .99999999999999 likelihood of
reorganizing to spread out; we are only doing this to .99999999999999 likelihood of accuracy” Then rather than the eentsiest distinguishable divisible resolution of the analog sensor, the resolution of the material behavior that the landscape is made
out of then brackets possible heights at features of some width, and the height and width that the analog system can represent are higher than that. So it can do a functional thing.

So is it possible to do this imitation physics-like way of: bracketing resolution from the material behavior pattern at other systems. Yay logic, but I am trying to think of an analog complement, and I think a mathematician could do it, that describes
the usable span and singular (math word singularity) regions of analog computing, particularly what the analog computers are actually built out of; Development of the flash drive topologically-process-linked (like undulating skate park atriums) quantum
tunneling container technologies might physically make math things like a fourier equation statement of a waveform; I think fourier transform can do discontinuous waves and square waves; so can represent something like all the oscilloscope logic probes
at a computer circuit board; that is digital computing can be represented as fourier equations Then perhaps combine a bunch of fourier equations into one equation, or just (dubious on this) make an array as a thing (kind of like a program) a person other
than me can do great array-aware math on and with, as well as funtion as an egg carton full of program structures and instantly available oscilloscope map points. Note it is my perception that a fourier series can “say” even discontinuous functions
and things like square waves. If a fourier equation can describe a square wave I think a few of them in a thoughtful pile can do the same thing as a computer program, so an analog computer would also have digital capabilities.

It is a little different, getting beyond: but one view of flash drive unit containers with shapes, wallpaper, and slopes on their sides as components could be having a mathematically aware person figure out you can use the electron dwelling (flash drive
container) and electron flowing regions of an analog IC at some absence of risk of mutual overlap to minimize resolution decreasing (or said analog, at some applications or equations a fourier function going nondistinguishable from another) or
nonoptimally filterizing, like bandpass filter, things at the computed solution or preferred optimal process range; Or the mathematician could come up with equations that represent reusable patterns the programmers could use to build actual working
software.


That humans might be willing to make neural network analog ICs is possibly supported for what I think I read that some large companies are making neural network, perhaps massively multiparallel ICs

Those mathematically awesome humans, that is people, who can take a topological network, apply math to it, and sort of simplify it to a network, then

see if I can think of something better to replace cement, like really software optimized drones that can build things out of scraps, actual modules or components, parts of plants, and polymers with precision and software-forecast high durability. The
appearance of the drone-constructed things could be highly detailed, higher resolution and quality than that a human artist could produce, so drones that paint well would benefit humans

.5B
Robots or other automated mechanisms, possibly including drones, could make polymer containerized water building things, like cinder blocks, yet better; The possibly rapid production of water containing building component units could make automation-
built dwellings and other architectural objects at higher velocities and more affordable than some other appraoches to making an architectural product. I am thinking that ultrasonic welding of durable polymer film with water fill up during the
manufacturing process could make the components at an automated mechanism or drone. It is possible that a multivesicle water building component could retain structural strength and durability even if there was a zapping occurence; Cornlike water
vesicles with an external tube that becomes rigid is a possibility. Sort of like if you put an ear of corn in a tube, and the tube’s rigidity is increased because of the plurality of mini-water sacks that are the kernals of corn, and it makes the tube
more rigid for structural purposes. So instead of an ear of corn in a tube, you have a roll of what is kind of like a scroll of water filled bubble wrap with a tube-making polymer cover surface. The automated mechanism or even drone makes a bunch of
scroll-struts, and at the architectural object these are complemented with automated mechanism stackable shapes.
At cool climates water shapes could be structured to maintain function and not shift out of place even if frozen annually. Perhaps a soft polymer bag, full of air, part of each strut or stackable shape could harmlessly compress if the water froze,

Prenatal supplements, chemicals, or drugs that could be tested to see if they benefit babies and pregnant women, At quora I wrote, “There is some published material on use of arginine at veterinary food at raising birthweight, and creatine has numerous
benefits at adult humans and may be harmless or beneficial during pregnancy.” Creatine causes muscles to be stronger and to grow in size, it is possible a pregnant woman taking creatine might have a stronger uterus for making effective contractions
during labor of bearing children. Also, it is possible that prenatal creatine could be correlated with neonatal muscle strength and higher APGAR numbers, noting that high APGAR numbers predict lifetime well being of the person that develops from the
baby. Pregnant lab mammal and monkey studies on NMN and NR could show benefit to both the pregnant woman and her baby. Also, why not see if curcurmin benefits pregnancy and the APGAR of the neonatal person, and possibly their mental and social
development measured at age 5. No actual reason, I have just read curcurmin does a wide variety of beneficial things from improving healing to senolytically zapping cytes that are exporting toxins. On looking at pubmed there are studies showing benefits
of curcurmin to (I do not remember) pregnant lab mammals or their babies.


.5b
I am a vegetarian to be nice to animals. I am opposed to humans, that is people, wearing fur. Imitation fur could be improved to be better feeling than any animal fur. Just engineer, perhaps iteratively, polymer imitation fur, and soft fabric material
that is softer and snugglier than a particular sea otter pelt at the Charleston Marine Life Center; doing better than that pelt would create a thing anyone could have that feels really good. I read that it has one million hairs per square inch, so the
synthetic could have 2-10 million strands per square inch, and from an engineering perspective viewing each hair or strand as kind of spring on a pole, those spring on a pole numbers at the sea otter fur could be duplicated at the polymer imitation fur.
As an imitation of sea otter fur this would feel even nicer than 2019 AD “microplush” fabric products

peoples self help help housingcorporationwwww.pshhc.org
May 30th and April 2
Just for entertainment I could hire someone on fiverr to SEO optimize a realtor-getting-visits page to find a realtor gathering portfolio to get housing with at Santa Barbara with.

Write to Dave Pearce who wrote the hedweb.org online site:

MWI Many Worlds Intepretation of physics technologies and possible ideas and enhancements:

Dave Pearce: metallic porphyrins or photoactive proteins or photoactive lipids could do a thing where a numerous atom system at an aqueous environment (or cytosol like a neuron) has a photon-stimulable (linked (entagled) photons make this detectable
without a reflection or lensed path) quantum decoherence effect. If different metallic porphyrins have different intervals of response (time to change shape) to the stimulating photon then the size of the molecule affects the duration of the quantum
thing. Dave is concerned that things in neurons quantum-resolve at “femtoseconds” so different side metalloporphyrins might have longer, and photon measurable durations. At macromolecules like proteins or rubber tires critiques of the femtoseconds
thing and could, at Dave’s “schoedinger’s neurons” idea give a quantum duration size of the size of consciousness different intervals.

Different chronological duration to resolution, “quantum intervals”, could be built up, or perhaps some are really long.

At Dave’s “schoedinger’s neuron” idea, uncollapsed quantum states support consciousness. Stacks and arrays of nonresolved quantum effects could be affected, at the body and CNS/neurons with standing wave phenomena at a group of unresolved quanta,
and simpler standing wave producible things like mirrors and resulting wave phenomena like mirrors, lenses and simpler solitons near other actual molecule based things, like proteins, neurons, or quantum-computer parts cause durability of structure from
the standing wave phenomena holding things where they are, and causing concentration, reminiscent of stable location blobs of plasma, or those blobby electron diagrams like HOMO and LUMO. Standing wave phenomena as well as soliton-makers could be made
from something like a standing wave version of a mirror could cause all kind of effects from Etalons that “big tune” something to solitons that have persistence and travel. Generating new observales like these could make testing Dave “schoedinger�
��s neurons” thing easier and also represent combinable technological components to make new things out of. If Dave’s “schoedingers neurons” fostering aware sentience thing has function, then these components like solitons, etalons, lenses could
be used to create or customize artificial actual sentience; isness as well.

MWI research might already suggest that the possible recombinations of possible MWI universes from a multiatom system is larger and different from a MWI amount based on monoatomic emissions quantitative MWI universe quantity. That suggests that the MWI
amount from standing wave technologies or naturally ocurring things with novel nonresolved quantum durability and also quantum event structures and technologies could be larger than stochastic MWI generators like all-single-atoms or the big amounts of
MWI universes from all the quantum resolution at something big like a stellar object. If chronologically durable and spatially structured quantum slow-to-resolvers are possible (and near macroscopic quantum computers with more than trillions of atoms
support this) then that gives the possibility that something built on earth could outproduce something like the sun at purposefully making more hedonistic-imperative achieving sentiences, among those sentiences being people, that is people including
humans, amount consciousnesses hosting MWI universes than other versions of MWI.

Another way to make more MWI universes, on purpose, than a big fusion reactor like the sun is to quantum resolve faster, or quantum resolve more electron, photons or atoms simultaneously. There is a physicist that says the first time a human, with an
instrument, sees a blob of matter, like a moon or a stellar object, possibly (I do not remember) not ever previously observed, then that human observation resolves the quantum indeterminacy of that object. So purposefully seeing vast objects could the
out MWI universe out generate the sun. So when something that is really supportive and trending of human and all sentience well being and supportive of hedonistic imperative and numerous (most, possibly all prescriptives and preferred effects) things
described at hedweb.org humans, or computer based
An Software or an AI could scan the internet, when things are going well, notably supporting the hedonistic imperative, it could aim a telescope at a glaxy or a stellar object, and resolve many millions of sun-masses instantly, multiplying the number of
MWI universes that have the up favoring future event; on a mediocre day the AI could omit looking at and finding a new galxay or stellar object to observe. That creates vast plurality of branch-earths where things have a good start and a good middle,
and noting the transhumanism of the hedonistic imperative and the existence of time machines, it is possible to omit the clihe of “SME”.

At Dave Pearce “schroedinginer’s neuron” theory producing different size standing waves of quantum effects, as technologies and pre-existing CNS parts like proteins, tissues, neurons, dendrites, synapses, that can be searched for and possibly found
would cause different sizes of consciousness structures that are producing consciousness.

Notably for Dave things like solitons, circular polarization, or standing-wave artificial atom from a focusing parabola of atoms, could cause different durations of a quantum neuron structure effect, each of these could have different technologically
testable characteristics for scientists motivated by Dave (Or even Dave; Hey Dave, do an experiment and publish!); where these researchers or technologists make “Schroedinger’s neurons” duration and physical span variations supporting/refuting
experiments, some of which could be easier than interferometry of part or whole neurons. So, modifying quantum resolution time with things like metallic porphyrins, standing wave structures, and

Testing Dave’s “schoedinger’s neurons” with spin polarized gas at neurons: Also, if you could prove something was not a drug, then engineer that to affect quantum duration resolution, then give it to a mammal, like a human volunteer, and see if
their reports on what their consciousness was like, how it changed, then you would have a new type of pharmaceutical or treatment that affected mind from affecting quantum resolution durations.

Standing waves of photons,which might croup, concentrate, and thin quantum resoltions; the standing wave photons are projected on a neuron, this compared with the same amount of energy as a simple beam, might have different effects; although makign
standing waves reminds me a lot of laer tractor beams or even just patterned warming (more molecular wiggles-> morereactivity->more neurochemistry->effects) to control for. Perhaps much less noisy would be utilizing a spin-polarized gas as a possible
quantum resolution rapidifying or gradualizing effect at things like atoms, molecules, proteins and electron potential areas (reminded of blobby HOMO/LUMO images), at neurons and other things, so a spin polarized gas at the surface of a test neuron might
cause different effects than the gas at its nonpolarized form. If there are effects on the neuron that would not be predicted from spintronics theory, then it could be that quantum resolution rapidifying or gradualizing could be affecting a part of a
tissue, neurons, that can effect consciousness. Spin polarized gas would, as far as I perceive, less effect on the wiggle at the molecules,sois possibly a higher resolution easier test of the “schoedinger’s neurons” idea.

(Thinking of Dave doing an actual experiment: Hey Dave, do an experiment and publish! Build a delayed Quantum choice eraser (DQCE) and have it shine through a c. elegans neuron-filled head; the c. elegans is precheduled to learn something during the 24
hours before the photon path was later observed and changed and then see if the c. elegans either learns or has been made to have omitted ever learning something from the prior DQCE setup) That would, perhaps, show 1) c elegans can resolve, or fix a
quantum state 2) It is possible to erase things with the DQCE, 3) there might be hints or novel results that affect “schroedingers neurons” theories.) Note: DQCE with c elegans is possibly spurious, noticeably noncomplete and could use improving to
where it makes more sense and actually addresses Dave’s emphasis on testing the “schoedinger’s neurons” idea. Still if Dave can get a 24 hour modification of a neural learning, “thought” with quantum effects it might suggest new areas of
productive, technologizable research.

it has occured that when I thinkof MWI, notably unitary MWI, the number of universes increases. It could also be that unitary MWI is even bigger from things like spherical emissions of photons from each sinlge photon emitted from a spherical-like
electron-at-atom. AS the sphere coordinatesare continuous (emit from any angle at any (pretend latitude and longitude) rather than discrete,as far as I know. This could cause a nonfinite (infinite) number of sphere-coordinate possible photon paths
being emitted from a single photon-electron event.

Just one integer-size (atom, one electron, one photon) nonfinite electron spectral photon emissions would cause each atom to have a nonfinite number of MWI universe generated occurences based on photon angle of heading out.

Technologically demonstating that a larger sized (1cm photodetector size area compared 1 mm sized photodetector) should detect (enumerate) more actual photon-events from one rubidium atom that is laser cooled, that is experiencing a 1 photon laser at an
experiment supports an every possible photon path version of MWI.

Sphericalcoordinates as analog,rather than discrete making plural photon paths causes the emitted photon to meetup with completely different surrounding atoms or far stellar objects, thus is a unique event,likely an MWI univrese generator,even only if
onabsorption rather than emission.

Noting the number of MWI universes from an analog spherical coordinate is notably bigger than an every photon from a simple 1-electron one photon thought-of-event, then of course every emitted from an electron at spherical coordinates makes every
possible photon path, factorial (or some other math thing), to be a MWI-universe quntity idea of the moment. Although, it is actually possible, I do not know the math though, that the combinatorial effect of every analog spherical coordinate path photon
on every photon re-emitter, absorber, or even possible photon-photon interaction interacting with every other of these could be my size-perception of MWI universe amount at this moment, at what might causually get called the “20th century observable
universe”. At quora Dave mentions a paper I have not read and he says something slightly like “it [MWI universe amount] is even bigger than you think”

An area of math I have read about, but do not know the equation-manipulating mechanics of, is aleph numbers that refer to diffent forms or size of nonfinite (infinite) things. If it were as simple as saying aleph2 * aleph3 is aleph3 mapped onto
something with an extra dimension (for example if you mulitiply a set called “all the integers” times a set called “all the square roots of all the rational numbers” perhaps this is somehow algebra-geomtry compatible with saying, “although the
equation’s aleph numbers are 1 dimensional, the calulation of that big, or form of, an infinity should be representable on a 2d plane, or a plurality of them at a 3d volume.” So if there is a geomety-algebra connection between adding, subtracting,
and doing statistical calculations on aleph numbers (MWI aleph numbers being a notable thing), where it translates to a geometry stated way of comphrending, like, possibly a 2d space or 3d space could contain and represent that aleph number equation’s
result, then that would be beneficial, and might make MWI universe amount easier to do calculations on, thoughfully visualize, compare, and even do simple math on like, add subtract, multiply, divide, matrices, exponents, and support statistics equations;
a mathematically functional way to use geometry and dimensionality to represent and be an statement of, aleph-number calculations and formulas, could cause new things which might be awesome and amazing.

Thinking geometry, what if some geometric equational statements of aleph numbers have vertices or even a radius? A vertex at some combination of infinities from aleph eometry equations could be some superstructure, or its own mathematically groupable
and equationable thing. At MWI nonfinity ideas, perhaps a vertex could be a Branch that is very likely to happen, or even a precluded branch; a geometric representation with a few or numerous vertices might be a math and physics basis for things being
synchronized, or physics connected, that during 2019 AD would be thought connectionless.

Popular mathematics seems to support geometricization of aleph number equations: Although I think Cantor’s generation of different sizez of infinities was kind of 1 dimensional, the paper I sawlookedlike a square. I think I read that Cantor coming up
with different sizes of infinities was linked to extending each number at a set with another number; on a piece of paper it looked like a bunch of diagonals at a square, so popping up a dimension, possibly volume, capable of nonfinite number of vertical
layers, could perhaps functionally be a geometric base for a higher aleph number, and what you do to the 3d volume could be equations that utilize aleph numbers to do things like MWI statistics as well as much other mathematics.

Other mathematics has many possibilities for seeking, finding, and making order at the MWI, and possibly the unitary MWI. Perhaps when aleph3 is divided with aleph 2 you get a geometic 2.5d fractal, and so could predict repetitions of an object or theme
at a nonfinite distribution that was happing to produce the aleph number. That might be a basis for explaing why there are of lot of things that are much the same, like atoms, yet in different arrangements. Technologically, When having noticed that
happy is better, you could customize an aleph number fractal to generate more instances of more frequent, more optimal happiness durations, with higher neighbor happiness also heightened happiness causation; so since this is writable with MWI equations,
you can figure out how to move the entire MWI distribution towards a happier MWI, or possibly unitary MWI, possibly with changing one thing, like a variable, or amount of the variable at the equation, which is easiest to adjust with physics, or, noting
this is equationally based MWI modification effecting human experieince, a thing, different than physics, like possibly a pocket guide, or a web browser that always starts up with tabs that have happiness-accumulation/almost chemical engineering word:
reflux effects. If the mathematics got really advanced the MWI equations, possibly some of which might be fractal, that can guide near-term, beneficial human experience while optimizing the MWI distribution of resultant futures, could be considered as
to “things that are easily comprehensible, things that can be comprehended with thought, learning,or amount ofmoments spent thinking, and things that work, that are less comprehensible, although I suppose since the geometrization of aleph numbers
applied to the MWI, with the optional benefit of purposefully creating beneficial anisotropies, sometimes with duration anisotropy, some with bayesian predictability from self-similarity at a aleph number math based fractal is comprehendable; so a
beneficial thing not comprehendable to a 2019 AD human might be a software or AI generated list of activities, plans for objects to make, suggested optional physical relocations and other things. Itis possible that with some of these the software could
be producing the most optimal MWI branch universes it is capable of (perhaps always better than undirected MWI) thus benefitting humans, that is people, during their lives while also benefitting future humans and sentiences.

engineering, chemistry, computer ic, computer fab, longevity, longevity technology, treon, treon verdery, physics, lasers, laser, emiconductor, dimension, math, IT, IL, pattern resonance, time travel, chronotechnology, circile, eric the circle, cartoon,
healthspan, youthspan, cpi, manufacturing, fiscal, money, software, petroleum, archive at deviantart com user treonsebastia

All technologies, ideas, and inventions of Treon Sebastian Verdery are public domain at JUly 8,2023AD and previously, as well as after that date

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)