NYT Caught Switching Out Documents To Fix Botched Climate
Change Article
dailycaller.com
Tuesday, August 8, 2017
http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/08/nyt-caught-switching-out-documents-to-fix-botched-climate-change-article/
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
http://bit.do/jaimaharaj
NYT Caught Switching Out Documents To Fix Botched Climate
Change Article
dailycaller.com
Tuesday, August 8, 2017
http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/08/nyt-caught-switching-out-documents-to-fix-botched-climate-change-article/
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
http://bit.do/jaimaharaj
Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
NYT Caught Switching Out Documents To Fix Botched Climate
Change Article
dailycaller.com
Tuesday, August 8, 2017
http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/08/nyt-caught-switching-out-documents-to-fix-botched-climate-change-article/
Forwarded post:
NY Times: All Lies, Smears, Innuendo, and Hatred of
Conservatism. All. The. Time.
Try this one apparently from 2011:
NY Times Lies about Scott Walker, governor of Wisconsin
https://www.almanacnews.com/square/print/2015/02/16/new-york-times-caught-in--lie-about-scott-walker
Posted by SoFloFreeper
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
Doesn't matter how many drafts the NYT does on this
thing, their climate change is BS. Total BS. They are
trying to get us to focus on a lie that has no trail of
consistently connecting dots leading to factual
conclusion. NONE.
They think fractional evidence introduced by seemingly
credible sources is all they need to continue to press
their lie.
Only the gullible could possibly buy into such
incredible, and unproven theories.
Posted by rockinqsranch
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
Any common lunatic can refer to themselves as a 'climate
scientist' and the media gobbles up whatever crap they
spew out of their mouths as though it were scientific
fact. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
On 8/8/2017 8:43 PM, Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
NYT Caught Switching Out Documents To Fix Botched Climate
Change Article
dailycaller.com
Tuesday, August 8, 2017
http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/08/nyt-caught-switching-out-documents-to-fix-botched-climate-change-article/
Forwarded post:
NY Times: All Lies, Smears, Innuendo, and Hatred of
Conservatism. All. The. Time.
Try this one apparently from 2011:
NY Times Lies about Scott Walker, governor of Wisconsin
https://www.almanacnews.com/square/print/2015/02/16/new-york-times-caught-in--lie-about-scott-walker
Posted by SoFloFreeper
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
Doesn't matter how many drafts the NYT does on this
thing, their climate change is BS. Total BS. They are
trying to get us to focus on a lie that has no trail of
consistently connecting dots leading to factual
conclusion. NONE.
They think fractional evidence introduced by seemingly
credible sources is all they need to continue to press
their lie.
Only the gullible could possibly buy into such
incredible, and unproven theories.
Posted by rockinqsranch
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
Any common lunatic can refer to themselves as a 'climate
scientist' and the media gobbles up whatever crap they
spew out of their mouths as though it were scientific
fact. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
And anyone who can't understand and state clearly the scientific theory
by which greenhouse gases can warm the planet and clearly explain why
they believe these theories are wrong is just blowing steam when they
refute the theories.
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 22:48:39 -0700, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/8/2017 8:43 PM, Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
NYT Caught Switching Out Documents To Fix Botched Climate
Change Article
dailycaller.com
Tuesday, August 8, 2017
http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/08/nyt-caught-switching-out-documents-to-fix-botched-climate-change-article/
Forwarded post:
NY Times: All Lies, Smears, Innuendo, and Hatred of
Conservatism. All. The. Time.
Try this one apparently from 2011:
NY Times Lies about Scott Walker, governor of Wisconsin
https://www.almanacnews.com/square/print/2015/02/16/new-york-times-caught-in--lie-about-scott-walker
Posted by SoFloFreeper
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
Doesn't matter how many drafts the NYT does on this
thing, their climate change is BS. Total BS. They are
trying to get us to focus on a lie that has no trail of
consistently connecting dots leading to factual
conclusion. NONE.
They think fractional evidence introduced by seemingly
credible sources is all they need to continue to press
their lie.
Only the gullible could possibly buy into such
incredible, and unproven theories.
Posted by rockinqsranch
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
Any common lunatic can refer to themselves as a 'climate
scientist' and the media gobbles up whatever crap they
spew out of their mouths as though it were scientific
fact. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
And anyone who can't understand and state clearly the scientific theory
by which greenhouse gases can warm the planet and clearly explain why
they believe these theories are wrong is just blowing steam when they
refute the theories.
I understand the claimed theory and I know several reasons why the
theory abouit manmade CO2 is blatantly wrong. There are many people
much more qualified than I who can do that better than I and in more
detail, but still the Juggernaut rolls on.
I wish you would similarly require that the people who believe that
man made CO2 is the cause of such global warming as there is could
"state clearly the scientific theory by which greenhouse gases can
warm the planet and clearly explain why they believe these theories
are" correct.
On 8/10/2017 10:03 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 22:48:39 -0700, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/8/2017 8:43 PM, Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
NYT Caught Switching Out Documents To Fix Botched Climate
Change Article
dailycaller.com
Tuesday, August 8, 2017
http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/08/nyt-caught-switching-out-documents-to-fix-botched-climate-change-article/
Forwarded post:
NY Times: All Lies, Smears, Innuendo, and Hatred of
Conservatism. All. The. Time.
Try this one apparently from 2011:
NY Times Lies about Scott Walker, governor of Wisconsin
https://www.almanacnews.com/square/print/2015/02/16/new-york-times-caught-in--lie-about-scott-walker
Posted by SoFloFreeper
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
Doesn't matter how many drafts the NYT does on this
thing, their climate change is BS. Total BS. They are
trying to get us to focus on a lie that has no trail of
consistently connecting dots leading to factual
conclusion. NONE.
They think fractional evidence introduced by seemingly
credible sources is all they need to continue to press
their lie.
Only the gullible could possibly buy into such
incredible, and unproven theories.
Posted by rockinqsranch
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
Any common lunatic can refer to themselves as a 'climate
scientist' and the media gobbles up whatever crap they
spew out of their mouths as though it were scientific
fact. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
And anyone who can't understand and state clearly the scientific theory
by which greenhouse gases can warm the planet and clearly explain why
they believe these theories are wrong is just blowing steam when they
refute the theories.
I understand the claimed theory and I know several reasons why the
theory abouit manmade CO2 is blatantly wrong. There are many people
much more qualified than I who can do that better than I and in more
detail, but still the Juggernaut rolls on.
I wish you would similarly require that the people who believe that
man made CO2 is the cause of such global warming as there is could
"state clearly the scientific theory by which greenhouse gases can
warm the planet and clearly explain why they believe these theories
are" correct.
Feel free to convince me with your well thought out thoughts on the
subject.
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 06:49:27 -0700, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/10/2017 10:03 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 22:48:39 -0700, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/8/2017 8:43 PM, Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
NYT Caught Switching Out Documents To Fix Botched Climate
Change Article
dailycaller.com
Tuesday, August 8, 2017
http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/08/nyt-caught-switching-out-documents-to-fix-botched-climate-change-article/
Forwarded post:
NY Times: All Lies, Smears, Innuendo, and Hatred of
Conservatism. All. The. Time.
Try this one apparently from 2011:
NY Times Lies about Scott Walker, governor of Wisconsin
https://www.almanacnews.com/square/print/2015/02/16/new-york-times-caught-in--lie-about-scott-walker
Posted by SoFloFreeper
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
Doesn't matter how many drafts the NYT does on this
thing, their climate change is BS. Total BS. They are
trying to get us to focus on a lie that has no trail of
consistently connecting dots leading to factual
conclusion. NONE.
They think fractional evidence introduced by seemingly
credible sources is all they need to continue to press
their lie.
Only the gullible could possibly buy into such
incredible, and unproven theories.
Posted by rockinqsranch
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
Any common lunatic can refer to themselves as a 'climate
scientist' and the media gobbles up whatever crap they
spew out of their mouths as though it were scientific
fact. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
And anyone who can't understand and state clearly the scientific theory >>>> by which greenhouse gases can warm the planet and clearly explain why
they believe these theories are wrong is just blowing steam when they
refute the theories.
I understand the claimed theory and I know several reasons why the
theory abouit manmade CO2 is blatantly wrong. There are many people
much more qualified than I who can do that better than I and in more
detail, but still the Juggernaut rolls on.
I wish you would similarly require that the people who believe that
man made CO2 is the cause of such global warming as there is could
"state clearly the scientific theory by which greenhouse gases can
warm the planet and clearly explain why they believe these theories
are" correct.
Feel free to convince me with your well thought out thoughts on the
subject.
You really want me to discuss the flaws in a theory without first
making clear to me what that theory is?
On 8/11/2017 5:56 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 06:49:27 -0700, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/10/2017 10:03 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 22:48:39 -0700, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/8/2017 8:43 PM, Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
NYT Caught Switching Out Documents To Fix Botched Climate
Change Article
dailycaller.com
Tuesday, August 8, 2017
http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/08/nyt-caught-switching-out-documents-to-fix-botched-climate-change-article/
Forwarded post:
NY Times: All Lies, Smears, Innuendo, and Hatred of
Conservatism. All. The. Time.
Try this one apparently from 2011:
NY Times Lies about Scott Walker, governor of Wisconsin
https://www.almanacnews.com/square/print/2015/02/16/new-york-times-caught-in--lie-about-scott-walker
Posted by SoFloFreeper
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
Doesn't matter how many drafts the NYT does on this
thing, their climate change is BS. Total BS. They are
trying to get us to focus on a lie that has no trail of
consistently connecting dots leading to factual
conclusion. NONE.
They think fractional evidence introduced by seemingly
credible sources is all they need to continue to press
their lie.
Only the gullible could possibly buy into such
incredible, and unproven theories.
Posted by rockinqsranch
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
Any common lunatic can refer to themselves as a 'climate
scientist' and the media gobbles up whatever crap they
spew out of their mouths as though it were scientific
fact. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
And anyone who can't understand and state clearly the scientific theory >>>>> by which greenhouse gases can warm the planet and clearly explain why >>>>> they believe these theories are wrong is just blowing steam when they >>>>> refute the theories.
I understand the claimed theory and I know several reasons why the
theory abouit manmade CO2 is blatantly wrong. There are many people
much more qualified than I who can do that better than I and in more
detail, but still the Juggernaut rolls on.
I wish you would similarly require that the people who believe that
man made CO2 is the cause of such global warming as there is could
"state clearly the scientific theory by which greenhouse gases can
warm the planet and clearly explain why they believe these theories
are" correct.
Feel free to convince me with your well thought out thoughts on the
subject.
You really want me to discuss the flaws in a theory without first
making clear to me what that theory is?
Please. Tell me the theory, and convince me it is wrong. If you know it
it wrong, you must know what the theory is.
On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 07:05:16 -0700, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/11/2017 5:56 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 06:49:27 -0700, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/10/2017 10:03 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 22:48:39 -0700, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
On 8/8/2017 8:43 PM, Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
NYT Caught Switching Out Documents To Fix Botched Climate
Change Article
dailycaller.com
Tuesday, August 8, 2017
http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/08/nyt-caught-switching-out-documents-to-fix-botched-climate-change-article/
Forwarded post:
NY Times: All Lies, Smears, Innuendo, and Hatred of
Conservatism. All. The. Time.
Try this one apparently from 2011:
NY Times Lies about Scott Walker, governor of Wisconsin
https://www.almanacnews.com/square/print/2015/02/16/new-york-times-caught-in--lie-about-scott-walker
Posted by SoFloFreeper
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
Doesn't matter how many drafts the NYT does on this
thing, their climate change is BS. Total BS. They are
trying to get us to focus on a lie that has no trail of
consistently connecting dots leading to factual
conclusion. NONE.
They think fractional evidence introduced by seemingly
credible sources is all they need to continue to press
their lie.
Only the gullible could possibly buy into such
incredible, and unproven theories.
Posted by rockinqsranch
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
Any common lunatic can refer to themselves as a 'climate
scientist' and the media gobbles up whatever crap they
spew out of their mouths as though it were scientific
fact. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
And anyone who can't understand and state clearly the scientific theory >>>>>> by which greenhouse gases can warm the planet and clearly explain why >>>>>> they believe these theories are wrong is just blowing steam when they >>>>>> refute the theories.
I understand the claimed theory and I know several reasons why the
theory abouit manmade CO2 is blatantly wrong. There are many people
much more qualified than I who can do that better than I and in more >>>>> detail, but still the Juggernaut rolls on.
I wish you would similarly require that the people who believe that
man made CO2 is the cause of such global warming as there is could
"state clearly the scientific theory by which greenhouse gases can
warm the planet and clearly explain why they believe these theories
are" correct.
Feel free to convince me with your well thought out thoughts on the
subject.
You really want me to discuss the flaws in a theory without first
making clear to me what that theory is?
Please. Tell me the theory, and convince me it is wrong. If you know it
it wrong, you must know what the theory is.
I already have several times invited you to tell me exactly what is
your theory of global warming. Each time you have avoided the question
and have asked me (as now) to explain what is wrong with your theory.
That's odd.
The ordinary reader could be forgiven for concluding that you don't
know or understand the explanation commonly put forward for global
warming. You instead seem to have a mindless response as though you
have been conditioned to be an advocate without actually knowing why.
On 8/12/2017 5:49 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 07:05:16 -0700, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/11/2017 5:56 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 06:49:27 -0700, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>
On 8/10/2017 10:03 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 22:48:39 -0700, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>
On 8/8/2017 8:43 PM, Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
NYT Caught Switching Out Documents To Fix Botched Climate >>>>>>>>>>> Change Article
dailycaller.com
Tuesday, August 8, 2017
http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/08/nyt-caught-switching-out-documents-to-fix-botched-climate-change-article/
Forwarded post:
NY Times: All Lies, Smears, Innuendo, and Hatred of
Conservatism. All. The. Time.
Try this one apparently from 2011:
NY Times Lies about Scott Walker, governor of Wisconsin
https://www.almanacnews.com/square/print/2015/02/16/new-york-times-caught-in--lie-about-scott-walker
Posted by SoFloFreeper
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
Doesn't matter how many drafts the NYT does on this
thing, their climate change is BS. Total BS. They are
trying to get us to focus on a lie that has no trail of
consistently connecting dots leading to factual
conclusion. NONE.
They think fractional evidence introduced by seemingly
credible sources is all they need to continue to press
their lie.
Only the gullible could possibly buy into such
incredible, and unproven theories.
Posted by rockinqsranch
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
Any common lunatic can refer to themselves as a 'climate
scientist' and the media gobbles up whatever crap they
spew out of their mouths as though it were scientific
fact. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
And anyone who can't understand and state clearly the scientific theory >>>>>>> by which greenhouse gases can warm the planet and clearly explain why >>>>>>> they believe these theories are wrong is just blowing steam when they >>>>>>> refute the theories.
I understand the claimed theory and I know several reasons why the >>>>>> theory abouit manmade CO2 is blatantly wrong. There are many people >>>>>> much more qualified than I who can do that better than I and in more >>>>>> detail, but still the Juggernaut rolls on.
I wish you would similarly require that the people who believe that >>>>>> man made CO2 is the cause of such global warming as there is could >>>>>> "state clearly the scientific theory by which greenhouse gases can >>>>>> warm the planet and clearly explain why they believe these theories >>>>>> are" correct.
Feel free to convince me with your well thought out thoughts on the
subject.
You really want me to discuss the flaws in a theory without first
making clear to me what that theory is?
Please. Tell me the theory, and convince me it is wrong. If you know it
it wrong, you must know what the theory is.
I already have several times invited you to tell me exactly what is
your theory of global warming. Each time you have avoided the question
and have asked me (as now) to explain what is wrong with your theory.
That's odd.
The ordinary reader could be forgiven for concluding that you don't
know or understand the explanation commonly put forward for global
warming. You instead seem to have a mindless response as though you
have been conditioned to be an advocate without actually knowing why.
Which is to say, you don't have a clue about the real science.
On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 21:33:20 -0700, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/12/2017 5:49 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2017 07:05:16 -0700, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/11/2017 5:56 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 06:49:27 -0700, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
On 8/10/2017 10:03 PM, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 22:48:39 -0700, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
On 8/8/2017 8:43 PM, Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
NYT Caught Switching Out Documents To Fix Botched Climate >>>>>>>>>>>> Change Article
dailycaller.com
Tuesday, August 8, 2017
http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/08/nyt-caught-switching-out-documents-to-fix-botched-climate-change-article/
Forwarded post:
NY Times: All Lies, Smears, Innuendo, and Hatred of
Conservatism. All. The. Time.
Try this one apparently from 2011:
NY Times Lies about Scott Walker, governor of Wisconsin
https://www.almanacnews.com/square/print/2015/02/16/new-york-times-caught-in--lie-about-scott-walker
Posted by SoFloFreeper
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
Doesn't matter how many drafts the NYT does on this
thing, their climate change is BS. Total BS. They are
trying to get us to focus on a lie that has no trail of
consistently connecting dots leading to factual
conclusion. NONE.
They think fractional evidence introduced by seemingly
credible sources is all they need to continue to press
their lie.
Only the gullible could possibly buy into such
incredible, and unproven theories.
Posted by rockinqsranch
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
Any common lunatic can refer to themselves as a 'climate
scientist' and the media gobbles up whatever crap they
spew out of their mouths as though it were scientific
fact. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
And anyone who can't understand and state clearly the scientific theory
by which greenhouse gases can warm the planet and clearly explain why >>>>>>>> they believe these theories are wrong is just blowing steam when they >>>>>>>> refute the theories.
I understand the claimed theory and I know several reasons why the >>>>>>> theory abouit manmade CO2 is blatantly wrong. There are many people >>>>>>> much more qualified than I who can do that better than I and in more >>>>>>> detail, but still the Juggernaut rolls on.
I wish you would similarly require that the people who believe that >>>>>>> man made CO2 is the cause of such global warming as there is could >>>>>>> "state clearly the scientific theory by which greenhouse gases can >>>>>>> warm the planet and clearly explain why they believe these theories >>>>>>> are" correct.
Feel free to convince me with your well thought out thoughts on the >>>>>> subject.
You really want me to discuss the flaws in a theory without first
making clear to me what that theory is?
Please. Tell me the theory, and convince me it is wrong. If you know it >>>> it wrong, you must know what the theory is.
I already have several times invited you to tell me exactly what is
your theory of global warming. Each time you have avoided the question
and have asked me (as now) to explain what is wrong with your theory.
That's odd.
The ordinary reader could be forgiven for concluding that you don't
know or understand the explanation commonly put forward for global
warming. You instead seem to have a mindless response as though you
have been conditioned to be an advocate without actually knowing why.
Which is to say, you don't have a clue about the real science.
Are you really saying that *I* don't have a clue about the real
science for the reason that *you* don't know enough to tell me
exactly what is *your* theory of global warming?
Duh!
It isn't "my" theory. It is well presented multiple places. You eitherAnd anyone who can't understand and state clearly the scientific theory
by which greenhouse gases can warm the planet and clearly explain why >>>>>>>>> they believe these theories are wrong is just blowing steam when they >>>>>>>>> refute the theories.
I understand the claimed theory and I know several reasons why the >>>>>>>> theory abouit manmade CO2 is blatantly wrong. There are many people >>>>>>>> much more qualified than I who can do that better than I and in more >>>>>>>> detail, but still the Juggernaut rolls on.
I wish you would similarly require that the people who believe that >>>>>>>> man made CO2 is the cause of such global warming as there is could >>>>>>>> "state clearly the scientific theory by which greenhouse gases can >>>>>>>> warm the planet and clearly explain why they believe these theories >>>>>>>> are" correct.
Feel free to convince me with your well thought out thoughts on the >>>>>>> subject.
You really want me to discuss the flaws in a theory without first
making clear to me what that theory is?
Please. Tell me the theory, and convince me it is wrong. If you know it >>>>> it wrong, you must know what the theory is.
I already have several times invited you to tell me exactly what is
your theory of global warming. Each time you have avoided the question >>>> and have asked me (as now) to explain what is wrong with your theory.
That's odd.
The ordinary reader could be forgiven for concluding that you don't
know or understand the explanation commonly put forward for global
warming. You instead seem to have a mindless response as though you
have been conditioned to be an advocate without actually knowing why.
Which is to say, you don't have a clue about the real science.
Are you really saying that *I* don't have a clue about the real
science for the reason that *you* don't know enough to tell me
exactly what is *your* theory of global warming?
Duh!
know something about it or you don't. So, since YOU know it isn't true, >despite the opinions of all the experts, I will leave it up to you to
clearly refute it. Please, educate me.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 293 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 231:13:23 |
| Calls: | 6,624 |
| Files: | 12,171 |
| Messages: | 5,319,423 |