In alt.usage.english, in article <4a54ba0e-8e92-4a8a-a046-63d4399eb86d@googlegroups.com>,
Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> posted:
Shortage of physicists in the public arena is caused by the
ridiculous e=mcc religion. The snooty pseudo physicists
stick to their journals and conferences and money wasting
exercises. In an open public forum their lies cannot work,
so they have for their representatives incoherent idiots
making peculiar noises. And some swine, too, unable to
digest my pearls of wisdom. But there are a few decent
sorts as well.
Science Confirms U.S. Scientists Lie More Than Any Other
Scientists
By Casey Hendrickson
caseyandheathershow.com
Monday, November 22, 2010
Picture
Anyone with the IQ above your basic fecal speck knows that
global warming no longer exists, and never was the result
of man-made activity. False science doesn't end there,
however.
While a large volume of false scientific information is
distributed in the United States, the problem is much more
severe than we imagined.
As it turns out, you are far more likely to be given
inaccurate (or fabricated) scientific data by American
scientists, than any other group of scientists in the
world.
Physorg.com:
"US scientists are significantly more likely to publish
fake research than scientists from elsewhere, finds a trawl
of officially withdrawn (retracted) studies, published
online in the Journal of Medical Ethics."
http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-11-scientists-significantly-publish-fake.html
Hmmm . . . how very interesting.
I remember being told in high school that scientists don't
make that much money. Times have changed, and science is
big business now. Have you ever wondered why scientists do
the stupid studies they do? It's because they get money for
doing them. Even though we already know kids who drink
more than four sodas per day tend to bounce off of walls,
we'll study it anyway to get the money.
Not only are US scientists more likely to publish false
data than anyone in the world, but they are more likely to
be repeat offenders. They are also more likely to have
their work cited by other publications.
This explains so much, doesn't it?
US scientists, in an effort to make money, lie about their
scientific findings (ala climategate). This false data is
picked up by numerous publications (NY Times, LA Times,
WaPo, etc.), and is reprinted as if it were fact. Now
millions of Americans are convinced of some scientific
finding that is not rooted in fact. To make matters worse,
when the data is proven to be false (or fabricated) and the
findings are retracted, there is no such retraction in the
publications that helped distribute that false data.
Finally, a study worthy of a government grant.
-- Casey Hendrickson
More at: http://www.caseyandheathershow.com/1/post/2010/11/science-confirms-us-scientists-lie-more-than-any-other-scientists.html
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 295 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 20:10:40 |
Calls: | 6,640 |
Files: | 12,188 |
Messages: | 5,325,290 |