• "global warming" is a load of political activism crap.

    From Clinton Communism@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 15 14:37:36 2017
    XPost: alt.politics.bush, oc.general, alt.politics.democrat
    XPost: alt.hollywood

    There is no proof, only manipulated statistics to get government
    grant money.

    Only an idiot would fall for it.
     

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob F@21:1/5 to Clinton Communism on Fri Sep 15 08:05:03 2017
    XPost: oc.general, alt.politics.democrat

    On 9/15/2017 5:37 AM, Clinton Communism wrote:
    There is no proof, only manipulated statistics to get government
    grant money.

    Only an idiot would fall for it.



    Only an idiot would ignore science and spew fossil fuel speculator
    garbage all over usenet. Probably being paid well for the privilege.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Renee Keller@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 20 09:02:51 2017
    XPost: oc.general, alt.politics.democrat


    Only an idiot would ignore science and spew fossil fuel speculator
    garbage all over usenet. Probably being paid well for the privilege.

    I'm a scientist, and the Earth has had multiple ice ages and periods of
    tropics long before man could impact it, and we are due for another major change. And all the science indicates if man never existed, we would still
    be experiencing the kind of climate change we are having now.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob F@21:1/5 to Renee Keller on Wed Sep 20 09:57:56 2017
    XPost: oc.general, alt.politics.democrat

    On 9/20/2017 6:02 AM, Renee Keller wrote:

    Only an idiot would ignore science and spew fossil fuel speculator
    garbage all over usenet. Probably being paid well for the privilege.

    I'm a scientist, and the Earth has had multiple ice ages and periods of tropics long before man could impact it, and we are due for another major change. And all the science indicates if man never existed, we would still be experiencing the kind of climate change we are having now.



    So Mr. scientist, tell me exactly what is wrong with the theory that
    greenhouse gases cause additional warming over natural processes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Renee Keller@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 21 14:21:58 2017
    XPost: oc.general, alt.politics.democrat


    I'm a scientist, and the Earth has had multiple ice ages and periods of
    tropics long before man could impact it, and we are due for another major
    change. And all the science indicates if man never existed, we would
    still
    be experiencing the kind of climate change we are having now.



    So Mr. scientist, tell me exactly what is wrong with the theory that greenhouse gases cause additional warming over natural processes.

    Nothing, it's completely correct, and it's happened many times in the past.
    The only flaw is that those greenhouse gasses are only created by man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob F@21:1/5 to Renee Keller on Thu Sep 21 16:04:17 2017
    XPost: oc.general, alt.politics.democrat

    On 9/21/2017 11:21 AM, Renee Keller wrote:

    I'm a scientist, and the Earth has had multiple ice ages and periods of
    tropics long before man could impact it, and we are due for another major >>> change. And all the science indicates if man never existed, we would
    still
    be experiencing the kind of climate change we are having now.



    So Mr. scientist, tell me exactly what is wrong with the theory that
    greenhouse gases cause additional warming over natural processes.

    Nothing, it's completely correct, and it's happened many times in the past. The only flaw is that those greenhouse gasses are only created by man.



    So, if man has doubled the CO2, causing rapid increased warming, he
    could cut back the CO2 and decrease the problem. Thank you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Renee Keller@21:1/5 to All on Tue Sep 26 09:27:51 2017
    XPost: oc.general, alt.politics.democrat


    Nothing, it's completely correct, and it's happened many times in the
    past.
    The only flaw is that those greenhouse gasses are only created by man.



    So, if man has doubled the CO2, causing rapid increased warming, he could
    cut back the CO2 and decrease the problem. Thank you.


    That's not what I said or indicated. I said the FLAW is the thinking that those greenhouse greenhouse gases (including methane) are caused by man
    ONLY. Fact is, it's also a natural event.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob F@21:1/5 to Renee Keller on Tue Sep 26 13:38:11 2017
    XPost: oc.general, alt.politics.democrat

    On 9/26/2017 6:27 AM, Renee Keller wrote:

    Nothing, it's completely correct, and it's happened many times in the
    past.
    The only flaw is that those greenhouse gasses are only created by man.



    So, if man has doubled the CO2, causing rapid increased warming, he could
    cut back the CO2 and decrease the problem. Thank you.


    That's not what I said or indicated. I said the FLAW is the thinking that those greenhouse greenhouse gases (including methane) are caused by man
    ONLY. Fact is, it's also a natural event.



    But the current increase corresponds with fossil fuel usage. So we are
    clearly the cause.

    https://www.skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions.htm

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)