XPost: soc.culture.indian, sci.environment, alt.politics.economics

On 12/9/2016 10:31 AM, Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
That belief is at odds with the scientific community, Pew noted, citing
a 2013 report from the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
that concluded “with 95% certainty that human activity is the dominant
cause of observed warming since the mid-20th century.”

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: soc.culture.indian, sci.environment, alt.politics.economics

On 12/9/2016 11:48 AM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:

On 12/09/2016 02:08 PM, Bob F wrote:

On 12/9/2016 10:31 AM, Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
That belief is at odds with the scientific community, Pew noted, citing
a 2013 report from the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
that concluded “with 95% certainty that human activity is the dominant
cause of observed warming since the mid-20th century.”

Scientists are paid to come up with their opinions... No one pays for average Americans opinions.

Do you believe someone that accepts money to give an opinion

/or/

someone that is independent of any compensation giving opinions?

Do you really believe that the incredible amount of denial propaganda
all over the corporate media sponsored by the only organizations with
real money in this game, the fossil fuel industry, is actually to be
trusted. The fantasy that a few scientists are making so much money by
creating a fake climate theory that they can get the entire world's
scientists and governments, with the single exception of the Republican
Party, to support them is ludicrous. The denialists are a creation of
the fossil fuel industry trying to protect their incredible profits for
as long as they can until the roof crashes onto them. Follow the money.
It is clearly NOT in the hands of the scientists.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: soc.culture.indian, sci.environment, alt.politics.economics

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/feb/7/pentagon-orders-commanders-to-prioritize-climate-c/

https://climateandsecurity.org/tag/u-s-military/

https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2014/05/20/some-companies-adjusting-stronger-storms-and-severe-weather/wgsC3tV105MOdAQIU7J0YI/story.html

http://www.conocophillips.com/sustainable-development/environment/climate-change/Pages/default.aspx

We recognize that human activity, including the burning of fossil fuels,
is contributing to increased concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs)
in the atmosphere that can lead to adverse changes in global climate.
While uncertainties remain, we continue to manage GHG emissions in our operations and to integrate climate change-related activities and goals
into our business planning.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: soc.culture.indian, sci.environment, alt.politics.economics

On 12/09/2016 02:08 PM, Bob F wrote:

On 12/9/2016 10:31 AM, Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
That belief is at odds with the scientific community, Pew noted, citing
a 2013 report from the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
that concluded “with 95% certainty that human activity is the dominant
cause of observed warming since the mid-20th century.”

Scientists are paid to come up with their opinions... No one pays for
average Americans opinions.

Do you believe someone that accepts money to give an opinion

/or/

someone that is independent of any compensation giving opinions?

--
That's Karma

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: soc.culture.indian, sci.environment, alt.politics.economics

On 12/09/2016 03:20 PM, Bob F wrote:

On 12/9/2016 11:48 AM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:

On 12/09/2016 02:08 PM, Bob F wrote:

On 12/9/2016 10:31 AM, Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
That belief is at odds with the scientific community, Pew noted, citing
a 2013 report from the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
that concluded “with 95% certainty that human activity is the dominant
cause of observed warming since the mid-20th century.”

Scientists are paid to come up with their opinions... No one pays for
average Americans opinions.

Do you believe someone that accepts money to give an opinion

/or/

someone that is independent of any compensation giving opinions?

Do you really believe that the incredible amount of denial propaganda
all over the corporate media sponsored by the only organizations with
real money in this game,

Paid Climate scientists are neither the best or the brightest.... but
they may be the greediest.



--
That's Karma

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: soc.culture.indian, sci.environment, alt.politics.economics

On 12/9/2016 1:02 PM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:

On 12/09/2016 03:20 PM, Bob F wrote:

On 12/9/2016 11:48 AM, Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:

On 12/09/2016 02:08 PM, Bob F wrote:

On 12/9/2016 10:31 AM, Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
That belief is at odds with the scientific community, Pew noted, citing >>>> a 2013 report from the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
that concluded “with 95% certainty that human activity is the dominant >>>> cause of observed warming since the mid-20th century.”

Scientists are paid to come up with their opinions... No one pays for
average Americans opinions.

Do you believe someone that accepts money to give an opinion

/or/

someone that is independent of any compensation giving opinions?

Do you really believe that the incredible amount of denial propaganda
all over the corporate media sponsored by the only organizations with
real money in this game,

Paid Climate scientists are neither the best or the brightest.... but
they may be the greediest.

Incredible! Greedier than the fossil fuel industry???? What do you get
paid by the fossil fuel people for this nonsense.

Anyone interested in reading about how the ultra rich are manipulating
public opinion with their massive tax deductible donations to propaganda "foundations", read the book "Dark Money" by Jane Mayer.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)