• anti-music "remote control"

    From Eli the Bearded@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 12 00:29:59 2021
    https://www.vice.com/en/article/jg8wnb/square-dancing-noise-china

    Residents who are fed up with the noise from China's ubiquitous
    "dancing grannies" are resorting to a special device that could mess
    with the speakers that blast out loud music.

    They use an infrared remote control dubbed "anti-square dancing
    magical device" to silence the noisy dancing troupes that have taken
    over public squares, parks, and housing estates across China.
    [...]
    But with scarce public spaces in urban China, the loud music has
    become a major nuisance for other residents and led to intense
    disputes. In 2013, someone in the central city of Wuhan dumped feces
    on a group of dancing women. And in 2016, a man in the southern city
    of Guilin, angered by the noise, shot at a dancing group's
    loudspeaker with an air gun and accidentally hit a woman on her
    thigh.

    Merchants of the new square dancing repeller are advertising an
    easier way to stop the noise. The device, priced at $15 to $40 each
    on shopping site Taobao, resembles a universal remote control and is
    able to shut down most speakers operated by infrared signals,
    according to the vendors.

    The pictures, it's noteworthy to say, make the device look like it has
    been built into the case of a small flashlight, not a remote control.

    Sounds like a TV-B-Gone:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TV-B-Gone

    But are infra-red controlled speakers really common? I'd expect
    bluetooth to be the protocol of choice and not easily duped by such a
    device. Or is this something else, and the news story has it garbled?

    Elijah
    ------
    can't read Chinese and has not searched for primary sources

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Allison@21:1/5 to Eli the Bearded on Mon Oct 11 19:32:11 2021
    Eli the Bearded wrote:
    ===================

    The pictures, it's noteworthy to say, make the device look like it has
    been built into the case of a small flashlight, not a remote control.

    ** The IR LED is likely stronger than usual and needs to be focused to work at long distance.


    But are infra-red controlled speakers really common? I'd expect
    bluetooth to be the protocol of choice and not easily duped by such a
    device. Or is this something else, and the news story has it garbled?


    ** IR is the only common method of remote control for audio gear.
    Bluetooth is mainly used with cameras or smartphones.

    FYI:

    The news item makes no sense - even if you manage to trigger the "mute"
    on a speaker the users will soon put it back in action.

    When they get wise to what is happening, just covering the IR sensor will stop the harassment.


    ..... Phil

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich Sulin@21:1/5 to palli...@gmail.com on Sat Feb 26 10:02:10 2022
    On Tuesday, October 12, 2021 at 2:32:14 AM UTC, palli...@gmail.com wrote:
    Eli the Bearded wrote:
    ===================

    The pictures, it's noteworthy to say, make the device look like it has
    been built into the case of a small flashlight, not a remote control.
    ** The IR LED is likely stronger than usual and needs to be focused to work at long distance.
    But are infra-red controlled speakers really common? I'd expect
    bluetooth to be the protocol of choice and not easily duped by such a device. Or is this something else, and the news story has it garbled?

    ** IR is the only common method of remote control for audio gear.
    Bluetooth is mainly used with cameras or smartphones.

    FYI:

    The news item makes no sense - even if you manage to trigger the "mute"
    on a speaker the users will soon put it back in action.

    The 'arms race' will continue...
    IR is disappearing on consumer gear.
    We're seeing a majority of LCD & OLED TVs
    now come with an RF (Bluetooth) remote, not IR
    So joe/jane doesn't have to point it anywhere
    regards, RS

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Allison@21:1/5 to Rich Sulin on Sat Feb 26 16:06:23 2022
    Rich Sulin wrote:
    =============

    ** IR is the only common method of remote control for audio gear.
    Bluetooth is mainly used with cameras or smartphones.

    FYI:

    The news item makes no sense - even if you manage to trigger the "mute"
    on a speaker the users will soon put it back in action.

    The 'arms race' will continue...
    IR is disappearing on consumer gear.
    We're seeing a majority of LCD & OLED TVs
    now come with an RF (Bluetooth) remote, not IR

    ** But the issue is NOT with any of them.

    It's with portable ( battery powered) sound gear in public places.



    ..... Phil

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)