• OT: New imaging method enables detailed RNA analysis of the whole brain

    From Jan Panteltje@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 24 06:33:10 2024
    New imaging method enables detailed RNA analysis of the whole brain
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/11/241121141005.htm
    Source:
    Karolinska Institutet
    Summary:
    Researchers have developed a groundbreaking microscopy method that
    enables detailed three-dimensional (3D) RNA analysis at cellular resolution
    in whole intact mouse brains.
    The new method, called TRISCO, has the potential to transform our understanding of brain function,
    both in normal conditions and in disease, according to the new study.

    Paper:
    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adn9947

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Sloman@21:1/5 to Jan Panteltje on Sun Nov 24 20:31:41 2024
    On 24/11/2024 5:33 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    New imaging method enables detailed RNA analysis of the whole brain
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/11/241121141005.htm
    Source:
    Karolinska Institutet
    Summary:
    Researchers have developed a groundbreaking microscopy method that
    enables detailed three-dimensional (3D) RNA analysis at cellular resolution in whole intact mouse brains.
    The new method, called TRISCO, has the potential to transform our understanding of brain function,
    both in normal conditions and in disease, according to the new study.

    Paper:
    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adn9947

    There are a lot of different RNA molecules in the brain, and this method
    can identify three of them, though they hope to be able to push this up
    to a hundred or so in the future.

    https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/translational-research/0/steps/14201

    There are 23,000 different messenger RNA's encoded in the human genome,
    and whole lot different sorts of RNA that does other jobs.

    The researcher's seem to have a way to go yet.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jan Panteltje@21:1/5 to bill.sloman@ieee.org on Sun Nov 24 13:24:54 2024
    On a sunny day (Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:31:41 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vhurpu$2618b$2@dont-email.me>:

    On 24/11/2024 5:33 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    New imaging method enables detailed RNA analysis of the whole brain
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/11/241121141005.htm
    Source:
    Karolinska Institutet
    Summary:
    Researchers have developed a groundbreaking microscopy method that
    enables detailed three-dimensional (3D) RNA analysis at cellular resolution >> in whole intact mouse brains.
    The new method, called TRISCO, has the potential to transform our understanding of brain function,
    both in normal conditions and in disease, according to the new study.

    Paper:
    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adn9947

    There are a lot of different RNA molecules in the brain, and this method
    can identify three of them, though they hope to be able to push this up
    to a hundred or so in the future.

    https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/translational-research/0/steps/14201

    There are 23,000 different messenger RNA's encoded in the human genome,
    and whole lot different sorts of RNA that does other jobs.

    The researcher's seem to have a way to go yet.

    Sure, but it is a facinating field.
    I am waiting for the 'Build Your Own DIno' kit in teh shops..

    Hackers will then make virusses that specifically target some religions....
    for example.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Sloman@21:1/5 to Jan Panteltje on Mon Nov 25 12:37:05 2024
    On 25/11/2024 12:24 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:31:41 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vhurpu$2618b$2@dont-email.me>:

    On 24/11/2024 5:33 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    New imaging method enables detailed RNA analysis of the whole brain
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/11/241121141005.htm
    Source:
    Karolinska Institutet
    Summary:
    Researchers have developed a groundbreaking microscopy method that
    enables detailed three-dimensional (3D) RNA analysis at cellular resolution >>> in whole intact mouse brains.
    The new method, called TRISCO, has the potential to transform our understanding of brain function,
    both in normal conditions and in disease, according to the new study.

    Paper:
    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adn9947

    There are a lot of different RNA molecules in the brain, and this method
    can identify three of them, though they hope to be able to push this up
    to a hundred or so in the future.

    https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/translational-research/0/steps/14201

    There are 23,000 different messenger RNA's encoded in the human genome,
    and whole lot different sorts of RNA that does other jobs.

    The researcher's seem to have a way to go yet.

    Sure, but it is a facinating field.
    I am waiting for the 'Build Your Own DIno' kit in teh shops..

    Hackers will then make virusses that specifically target some religions.... for example.

    And how would they do that? A virus that could only survive in communion wafers?

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jan Panteltje@21:1/5 to bill.sloman@ieee.org on Mon Nov 25 05:59:16 2024
    On a sunny day (Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:37:05 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vi0kc3$2fhp2$1@dont-email.me>:

    On 25/11/2024 12:24 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:31:41 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
    <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vhurpu$2618b$2@dont-email.me>:

    On 24/11/2024 5:33 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    New imaging method enables detailed RNA analysis of the whole brain
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/11/241121141005.htm
    Source:
    Karolinska Institutet
    Summary:
    Researchers have developed a groundbreaking microscopy method that
    enables detailed three-dimensional (3D) RNA analysis at cellular resolution
    in whole intact mouse brains.
    The new method, called TRISCO, has the potential to transform our understanding of brain function,
    both in normal conditions and in disease, according to the new study.

    Paper:
    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adn9947

    There are a lot of different RNA molecules in the brain, and this method >>> can identify three of them, though they hope to be able to push this up
    to a hundred or so in the future.

    https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/translational-research/0/steps/14201

    There are 23,000 different messenger RNA's encoded in the human genome,
    and whole lot different sorts of RNA that does other jobs.

    The researcher's seem to have a way to go yet.

    Sure, but it is a facinating field.
    I am waiting for the 'Build Your Own DIno' kit in teh shops..

    Hackers will then make virusses that specifically target some religions.... >> for example.

    And how would they do that? A virus that could only survive in communion >wafers?

    There are many ways, targeting specific food is one of those.
    But if you can modify the related brain parts / neural net structure, you are in!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Sloman@21:1/5 to Jan Panteltje on Tue Nov 26 01:45:19 2024
    On 25/11/2024 4:59 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:37:05 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vi0kc3$2fhp2$1@dont-email.me>:

    On 25/11/2024 12:24 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:31:41 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman >>> <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vhurpu$2618b$2@dont-email.me>:

    On 24/11/2024 5:33 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    New imaging method enables detailed RNA analysis of the whole brain
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/11/241121141005.htm
    Source:
    Karolinska Institutet
    Summary:
    Researchers have developed a groundbreaking microscopy method that >>>>> enables detailed three-dimensional (3D) RNA analysis at cellular resolution
    in whole intact mouse brains.
    The new method, called TRISCO, has the potential to transform our understanding of brain function,
    both in normal conditions and in disease, according to the new study. >>>>>
    Paper:
    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adn9947

    There are a lot of different RNA molecules in the brain, and this method >>>> can identify three of them, though they hope to be able to push this up >>>> to a hundred or so in the future.

    https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/translational-research/0/steps/14201

    There are 23,000 different messenger RNA's encoded in the human genome, >>>> and whole lot different sorts of RNA that does other jobs.

    The researcher's seem to have a way to go yet.

    Sure, but it is a facinating field.
    I am waiting for the 'Build Your Own DIno' kit in teh shops..

    Hackers will then make virusses that specifically target some religions.... >>> for example.

    And how would they do that? A virus that could only survive in communion
    wafers?

    There are many ways, targeting specific food is one of those.
    But if you can modify the related brain parts / neural net structure, you are in!

    Not that anybody knows how to do that with something as simple as a
    virus. Religions work by brain-washing the young. So does science, but
    it is more careful about what it washes out and what it lets get back in.

    The religious right in the USA seems to like Donald Trump, which is
    really very strange. He does tell them what they want to hear, but they
    really should have enough sense to realise that that is the only reason
    he spouts that kind of nonsense.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jan Panteltje@21:1/5 to bill.sloman@ieee.org on Mon Nov 25 15:35:08 2024
    On a sunny day (Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:45:19 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vi22i3$2q5v7$2@dont-email.me>:

    On 25/11/2024 4:59 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:37:05 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
    <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vi0kc3$2fhp2$1@dont-email.me>:

    On 25/11/2024 12:24 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:31:41 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman >>>> <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vhurpu$2618b$2@dont-email.me>:

    On 24/11/2024 5:33 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    New imaging method enables detailed RNA analysis of the whole brain >>>>>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/11/241121141005.htm >>>>>> Source:
    Karolinska Institutet
    Summary:
    Researchers have developed a groundbreaking microscopy method that >>>>>> enables detailed three-dimensional (3D) RNA analysis at cellular resolution
    in whole intact mouse brains.
    The new method, called TRISCO, has the potential to transform our understanding of brain function,
    both in normal conditions and in disease, according to the new study. >>>>>>
    Paper:
    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adn9947

    There are a lot of different RNA molecules in the brain, and this method >>>>> can identify three of them, though they hope to be able to push this up >>>>> to a hundred or so in the future.

    https://www.futurelearn.com/info/courses/translational-research/0/steps/14201

    There are 23,000 different messenger RNA's encoded in the human genome, >>>>> and whole lot different sorts of RNA that does other jobs.

    The researcher's seem to have a way to go yet.

    Sure, but it is a facinating field.
    I am waiting for the 'Build Your Own DIno' kit in teh shops..

    Hackers will then make virusses that specifically target some religions....
    for example.

    And how would they do that? A virus that could only survive in communion >>> wafers?

    There are many ways, targeting specific food is one of those.
    But if you can modify the related brain parts / neural net structure, you are in!

    Not that anybody knows how to do that with something as simple as a
    virus.

    Matter of time


    Religions work by brain-washing the young. So does science, but
    it is more careful about what it washes out and what it lets get back in.

    Was reading the paper from this link this morning:
    New model of neuronal circuit provides insight on eye movement:
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/11/241122130623.htm
    Some things SEEM very complicated but are not
    did some neural net programming some years ago..

    There was also a nice program about AI this afternoon on German TV (prof).
    Kids working with AI ..



    The religious right in the USA seems to like Donald Trump, which is
    really very strange. He does tell them what they want to hear, but they >really should have enough sense to realise that that is the only reason
    he spouts that kind of nonsense.

    He is against the glowball Worming religious fanatic groups, many people are fed up with that dogma.
    All that said: We had the warmest November day since measurements begun here yesterday, in Dutch:
    https://nos.nl/artikel/2545789-17-1-graden-in-de-bilt-warmste-24-november-ooit-gemeten-in-nederland

    We will need the nuclear power, France has many nuclear power plants, now even in Germany
    they are talking about putting nuclear plants back online.
    Also to make Plutonium to defeat peepholes who blow up their gas pipelines I'd think.

    ;-)

    It is interesting Trump wants an ex Soros manager to reduce US debt.
    Maybe it works?
    Gold was above 2600 Euro yesterday for a moment.
    https://www.metalsdaily.com/live-prices/gold/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Sloman@21:1/5 to Jan Panteltje on Tue Nov 26 14:24:12 2024
    On 26/11/2024 2:35 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:45:19 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vi22i3$2q5v7$2@dont-email.me>:

    On 25/11/2024 4:59 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:37:05 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman >>> <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vi0kc3$2fhp2$1@dont-email.me>:

    On 25/11/2024 12:24 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:31:41 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman >>>>> <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vhurpu$2618b$2@dont-email.me>:

    On 24/11/2024 5:33 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:

    <snip>

    The religious right in the USA seems to like Donald Trump, which is
    really very strange. He does tell them what they want to hear, but they
    really should have enough sense to realise that that is the only reason
    he spouts that kind of nonsense.

    He is against the global Woarming religious fanatic groups, many people are fed up with that dogma.

    Except that it isn't any kind of religion. It's based on scientific investigation, not dogmatic assertion, though a dimwit like you isn't
    conscious of the distinction.

    The people who are fed up with the persistent assertions are mostly
    those who stand to lose money when we start taking them more seriously.


    All that said: We had the warmest November day since measurements begun here yesterday, in Dutch:
    https://nos.nl/artikel/2545789-17-1-graden-in-de-bilt-warmste-24-november-ooit-gemeten-in-nederland

    We will need the nuclear power, France has many nuclear power plants, now even in Germany
    they are talking about putting nuclear plants back online.
    Also to make Plutonium to defeat people who blow up their gas pipelines I'd think.

    You don't need plutonium to do that. Conventional explosives are
    perfectly adequte.
    And the main reason for not putting nuclear plants bsack on line is that
    they are inflexible and expensive.

    It is interesting that Trump wants an ex Soros manager to reduce US debt. Maybe it works?

    What Trump wants isn't all that interesting. He changes his mind - what
    there is of it - much too frequently for the latest fad to be worth
    worrying about.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jan Panteltje@21:1/5 to bill.sloman@ieee.org on Tue Nov 26 05:53:24 2024
    On a sunny day (Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:24:12 +1100) it happened Bill Slowman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vi3f10$3732f$1@dont-email.me>:

    On 26/11/2024 2:35 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:45:19 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
    <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vi22i3$2q5v7$2@dont-email.me>:

    On 25/11/2024 4:59 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:37:05 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman >>>> <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vi0kc3$2fhp2$1@dont-email.me>:

    On 25/11/2024 12:24 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:31:41 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman >>>>>> <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vhurpu$2618b$2@dont-email.me>:

    On 24/11/2024 5:33 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:

    <snip>

    The religious right in the USA seems to like Donald Trump, which is
    really very strange. He does tell them what they want to hear, but they
    really should have enough sense to realise that that is the only reason
    he spouts that kind of nonsense.

    He is against the global Woarming religious fanatic groups, many people are fed up with that dogma.

    Except that it isn't any kind of religion. It's based on scientific >investigation, not dogmatic assertion, though a dimwit like you isn't >conscious of the distinction.

    The people who are fed up with the persistent assertions are mostly
    those who stand to lose money when we start taking them more seriously.


    All that said: We had the warmest November day since measurements begun here yesterday, in Dutch:
    https://nos.nl/artikel/2545789-17-1-graden-in-de-bilt-warmste-24-november-ooit-gemeten-in-nederland

    We will need the nuclear power, France has many nuclear power plants, now even in Germany
    they are talking about putting nuclear plants back online.
    Also to make Plutonium to defeat people who blow up their gas pipelines I'd think.

    You don't need plutonium to do that. Conventional explosives are
    perfectly adequte.

    Not so simple, the YouAsh claims to have nukes (anti larking crypto).

    I really had fun when I did read on SeeAnAnt that the YouAsh, likely in response the Russian supersonic missiles,
    will now upgrade their sixties nukes, did not know much about that one, so used Wikipedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B61_nuclear_bomb
    Now that was really fun to read, sixties for sure, 3 digit entry code, levers but the real surprize was the B61 bomb components picture!!!
    Downloaded it ... they also say where it is stored etc etc..
    We all know from internet that the codes for the nukes in the submarines are all zeros so stressed sailors can launch.
    but hey, any small nation could get some group together and grab some of those nukes from where was it they are all stored?
    The electronix in that picture I could have bypassed myself in the sixties!!


    And the main reason for not putting nuclear plants bsack on line is that
    they are inflexible and expensive.

    So are many things


    It is interesting that Trump wants an ex Soros manager to reduce US debt.
    Maybe it works?

    What Trump wants isn't all that interesting. He changes his mind - what
    there is of it - much too frequently for the latest fad to be worth
    worrying about.

    It will be interesting, maybe he tries to inflate US debt away, he can make world peace.. or it really will be YouAsh.
    Bit like Clumsitor-Boom

    Bit of luck an F35 crashes next door and I have my own B61
    They fly over almost every day here.

    What a world!!!

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Bill Sloman on Tue Nov 26 08:26:43 2024
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    On 26/11/2024 2:35 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:45:19 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vi22i3$2q5v7$2@dont-email.me>:

    On 25/11/2024 4:59 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:37:05 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman >>> <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vi0kc3$2fhp2$1@dont-email.me>:

    On 25/11/2024 12:24 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:31:41 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
    <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vhurpu$2618b$2@dont-email.me>:

    On 24/11/2024 5:33 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:

    <snip>

    The religious right in the USA seems to like Donald Trump, which is
    really very strange. He does tell them what they want to hear, but they
    really should have enough sense to realise that that is the only reason
    he spouts that kind of nonsense.

    He is against the global Woarming religious fanatic groups, many people
    are fed up with that dogma.

    Except that it isn't any kind of religion. It's based on scientific investigation, not dogmatic assertion,

    It is followed like a religion and a lot of the 'science' in the popular
    media is utter rubbish. There may be some good science somewhere, but
    unless it supports the popular beliefs and dogmatic assertions it is
    never heard - that seems like religion to me.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Sloman@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Tue Nov 26 22:41:37 2024
    On 26/11/2024 7:26 pm, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    On 26/11/2024 2:35 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Tue, 26 Nov 2024 01:45:19 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman >>> <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vi22i3$2q5v7$2@dont-email.me>:

    On 25/11/2024 4:59 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:37:05 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman >>>>> <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vi0kc3$2fhp2$1@dont-email.me>:

    On 25/11/2024 12:24 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
    On a sunny day (Sun, 24 Nov 2024 20:31:41 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
    <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vhurpu$2618b$2@dont-email.me>:

    On 24/11/2024 5:33 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:

    <snip>

    The religious right in the USA seems to like Donald Trump, which is
    really very strange. He does tell them what they want to hear, but they >>>> really should have enough sense to realise that that is the only reason >>>> he spouts that kind of nonsense.

    He is against the global Woarming religious fanatic groups, many people
    are fed up with that dogma.

    Except that it isn't any kind of religion. It's based on scientific
    investigation, not dogmatic assertion,

    It is followed like a religion and a lot of the 'science' in the popular media is utter rubbish.

    The Murdoch media do publish a lot of climate change denial propaganda.
    I'm sure that they are paid well for doing it.

    There may be some good science somewhere, but
    unless it supports the popular beliefs and dogmatic assertions it is
    never heard - that seems like religion to me.

    There is a lot of good science in all the good science places.
    Newspapers like the Guardian with a commitment to publishing reliable information push the more digestible parts of it from time to time, but
    British science journalism isn't great. George Monbiot has specialised
    in the area, but he's unusual. Dutch science journalists do tend to have science degrees and can do better.

    Good science doesn't look anything like religion. If you know enough to understand the science you won't make that mistake.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Bill Sloman on Tue Nov 26 22:17:41 2024
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    Good science doesn't look anything like religion. If you know enough to understand the science you won't make that mistake.

    You appear to have misunderstood what I was trying to say. The results
    of good science are being ignored and suppressed because they don't
    support the 'religious' beliefs of those in charge. The politicians and
    the more ignorant of the people have been convinced by pseudo-science
    into believing things in a field they don't understand - so they take
    the simplic view: X=Good, Y=Bad which is fed to them by 'activists'.

    The evidence that disproved the 'scientific' claims which led to racial segregation in some countries and racial purges in others was suppressed
    by politicians and activists because it didn't suit their dogma.

    Only the flimsiest of evidence (if any) supported the bogus claim that
    lead leaching out of landfill was a major pollutant that could only be
    stopped by banning lead from solder. The evidence which would have
    shown that this was untrue was suppressed by politicians and activists
    because it didn't suit thier dogma.

    Try getting a grant in a British university to do research that might
    produce evidence that some major aspects of the 'Climate Change' theory
    are nothing but bunkum based on selected measurements and warped
    statistics. You won't; evidence like that iwould be suppressed by
    politicians and activists because it doesn't suit thier dogma.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Sloman@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Wed Nov 27 16:05:34 2024
    On 27/11/2024 9:17 am, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    Good science doesn't look anything like religion. If you know enough to
    understand the science you won't make that mistake.

    You appear to have misunderstood what I was trying to say. The results
    of good science are being ignored and suppressed because they don't
    support the 'religious' beliefs of those in charge. The politicians and
    the more ignorant of the people have been convinced by pseudo-science
    into believing things in a field they don't understand - so they take
    the simplic view: X=Good, Y=Bad which is fed to them by 'activists'.

    The evidence that disproved the 'scientific' claims which led to racial segregation in some countries and racial purges in others was suppressed
    by politicians and activists because it didn't suit their dogma.

    Only the flimsiest of evidence (if any) supported the bogus claim that
    lead leaching out of landfill was a major pollutant that could only be stopped by banning lead from solder. The evidence which would have
    shown that this was untrue was suppressed by politicians and activists because it didn't suit thier dogma.

    Try getting a grant in a British university to do research that might
    produce evidence that some major aspects of the 'Climate Change' theory
    are nothing but bunkum based on selected measurements and warped
    statistics. You won't; evidence like that would be suppressed by
    politicians and activists because it doesn't suit their dogma.

    On the contrary, politicians and activists love it when they find duff ostensibly "scientific" research that purports to show that climate
    change is bunkum.

    The scientific community hasn't had much trouble shooting them down.

    https://skepticalscience.com/print.php?r=180

    To be fair, Spencer and Christy didn't set out to produce duff data, but
    they were slower to correct their sublte errors than they might have
    been. They are both fundamentalist christians, which doesn't inhibit
    their scientific thinking, but reduces their motivation for showing that
    god is less benevolent than they'd like to think.

    --
    Bill sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)