Einstein's equations collide with the mysteries of the Universe
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/11/241111123136.htm
A French-Swiss team tests the famous physicist's predictions by calculating
the distortion of time and space
Yea,!>!
:-)
On 13/11/2024 4:34 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Einstein's equations collide with the mysteries of the Universe
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/11/241111123136.htm
A French-Swiss team tests the famous physicist's predictions by calculating
the distortion of time and space
Yea,!>!
:-)
Einstein's equations haven't collided with anything. The team reported
that their models - based on Einsteins equations - didn't match
observation from 3.5 and 5 billion years ago as well as those from 6 and
7 billion years ago. Einstein's equations aren't the only inputs
involved,and blaming the discrepancies on Einstein equations rather than
any of the other inputs to the team's models is the kind of
attention-getting device that is popular with academics, and goes down >particularly well with Jan Panteltje who doesn't seem to be fond of
Einstein.
On a sunny day (Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:14:16 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vh28ne$277eu$1@dont-email.me>:
On 13/11/2024 4:34 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Einstein's equations collide with the mysteries of the Universe
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/11/241111123136.htm
A French-Swiss team tests the famous physicist's predictions by calculating
the distortion of time and space
Yea,!>!
:-)
Einstein's equations haven't collided with anything. The team reported
that their models - based on Einsteins equations - didn't match
observation from 3.5 and 5 billion years ago as well as those from 6 and
7 billion years ago. Einstein's equations aren't the only inputs
involved,and blaming the discrepancies on Einstein equations rather than
any of the other inputs to the team's models is the kind of
attention-getting device that is popular with academics, and goes down
particularly well with Jan Panteltje who doesn't seem to be fond of
Einstein.
Bill we need a mechanism,
same as with Ohms law, it breaks down when current flows in a vacuum tube electrons needed to explain that.
see my reply to Martin.
On 14/11/2024 12:57 am, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:14:16 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vh28ne$277eu$1@dont-email.me>:
On 13/11/2024 4:34 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Einstein's equations collide with the mysteries of the Universe
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/11/241111123136.htm
A French-Swiss team tests the famous physicist's predictions by calculating
the distortion of time and space
Yea,!>!
:-)
Einstein's equations haven't collided with anything. The team reported
that their models - based on Einsteins equations - didn't match
observation from 3.5 and 5 billion years ago as well as those from 6 and >>> 7 billion years ago. Einstein's equations aren't the only inputs
involved,and blaming the discrepancies on Einstein equations rather than >>> any of the other inputs to the team's models is the kind of
attention-getting device that is popular with academics, and goes down
particularly well with Jan Panteltje who doesn't seem to be fond of
Einstein.
Bill we need a mechanism,
No. You want a mechanism that you can understand. People with better >understanding can cope with less easily comprehensible mechanisms.
same as with Ohms law, it breaks down when current flows in a vacuum tube
electrons needed to explain that.
Negative ions would have worked just as well until we knew more about
nature of the charge carriers.
see my reply to Martin.
It just shows that you don't know what you are talking about, as usual.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 415 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 93:05:59 |
| Calls: | 8,690 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 13,250 |
| Messages: | 5,947,022 |