This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque
control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
On 11/4/24 15:37, Cursitor Doom wrote:
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque
control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
Peanut was abducted and murdered in Republican Chemung County.
As of 2024, the Chemung County Legislature includes 13 Republicans and 2 Democrats.
In presidential elections, Chemung County tends to vote Republican.
In 2016, Donald Trump carried Chemung County with 55.64% of the vote
compared to Hillary Clinton's 38.09%. Trump carried the county again in
2020 with over 55% of the vote.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemung_County,_New_York
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-
peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
On a sunny day (Sat, 9 Nov 2024 15:26:02 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vgmo98$3jlbv$1@dont-email.me>:
On 9/11/2024 4:50 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 07 Nov 2024 06:41:58 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
[...]
Will Trump be shot?
I'd say he remains in grave peril. I don't trust the CIA goons. He
should surround himself with the 'wall of meat' the Bikers for Trump
offered him, augmented by a few Oathkeepers for good measure. It was
the CIA that whacked JFK - as I assume everyone knows now.
Only the conspiracy theory nuts like Cursitor Doom who like their
demented conspiracy theories to be totally implausible.
I would expect somebody of your age to have understood a bit more of how the US works,
peace is a danger to their weapon factories and supporting industry.
Reagan was shot at too.. Imagine peace with Russia.
On a sunny day (Sat, 9 Nov 2024 15:26:02 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman ><bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vgmo98$3jlbv$1@dont-email.me>:
On 9/11/2024 4:50 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 07 Nov 2024 06:41:58 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
[...]
Will Trump be shot?
I'd say he remains in grave peril. I don't trust the CIA goons. He
should surround himself with the 'wall of meat' the Bikers for Trump
offered him, augmented by a few Oathkeepers for good measure. It was
the CIA that whacked JFK - as I assume everyone knows now.
Only the conspiracy theory nuts like Cursitor Doom who like their
demented conspiracy theories to be totally implausible.
I would expect somebo[d]y of your age to have understood a bit more of how the YouAsh works,
peace is a danger to their weapon factories and supporting industry.
Reagan was shot at too.. Imagine peace with Russia.
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
I hope DT will make a victory lap of the USA and adbicate to Vance. >>>>>>Dream on. Biden had some sense (far too late) to bow out but there's no >>>>>> way Trump is turning over the keys to Vance, or anyone else, easy.
We'll never know what Nancy said to get Joe to quit. Probably
threatened to put his entire family in prison.
It was insane to have old Joe in the WH given the state he was in.
Seems the US only woke up to his deterioration in that first live TV
debate with Trump. But it was no secret to the rest of us that he'd
been in a bad way for at least 2 years before that. The MSM covered
for him very well. Can you imagine them doing that for Trump? This is
why fewer and fewer people pay any attention to the legacy media
nowadays and get their news from other sources. Zerohedge has run some >>>> amazing exposes that were vehemently denied and mocked by the MSM -
but they were subsequently proven 100% correct. They've saved my lilly >>>> white arse more than once, in fact.
Definitely not, we'll get to watch every gory detail of the succession
crisis (and it's already happening.) The vultures are already circling.
I've got my popcorn stocked up..
I think you may be in luck. They'll find a way to thwart Trump and the
will of the people yet.
Trump doesn't need much thwarting. His first term made it blindingly
obvious that he lacks the political skills to make things happen on
large scale. During the Covid-19 epidemic he made it obvious how his >intellectual defects made it difficult for him to do anything much, and
quite a few more Americans died of Covid-19 than woukd have done if he'd
been more competent.
These bastards are utterly ruthless and will
stop at literally nothing to get their way.
With Trump, they don't have to. He'll hang himself out to dry.
But they're no friends of yours, either. Whatever utopia you may be dreaming >> of if Trump's out of the picture, you won't find it delivered by THEM.
Nobody's dreaming of any utopia - the word means "no place".
"It literally translates as "no place", coming from the Greek: ??
("not") and ????? ("place"), and meant any non-existent society, when >'described in considerable detail'.
America would probably be run better if Trump was out of the picture,
but a century of ant-union and - incidentally, but necessarily, >anti-socialist - propaganda means that it unlikely to be as well run as
most of Europe with universal health care, good education for all and
less economic inequality. The biggest improvement would probably come
from making it more difficult for billionaires to spend loads of money
on helping politicians they like.
Trump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by
the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able
to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential >election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers,
you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
On 11/9/2024 1:06 AM, Bill Sloman wrote:
Love him or hate him, you have to give marketing props to Trump. He
successfully made the entire election about ->him<- and nothing else.
You're talking about Democrats, though. I'm talking about the kind of
candidate who could have won over the floating/undecided voters in the
swing states.
Most of whom weren't well educated, and were susceptible to Trump's lies.
A Democrat candidate who could have out-lied him is conceivable, but no
name springs to mind. Trump has been lying on a industrial scale for
most of his career and has a string of bankruptcies to show for it.
The take-away message is that America needs to clean up it's secondary
education system, but it is unique in that it's primary and secondary
education system is run and paid for by tiny school districts.
The US constitution was written before universal education was
economically feasible - it took Turnip Townsend's agricultural
revolution to make it possible - and education isn't a responsibility of
the nation or the individual states.
Trump managed to attract a significant fraction of the Jewish-American, >Muslim-American, _and_ neo-Nazi/white supremacist vote simultaneously, a >rather remarkable feat in its way. Maybe he should get a Nobel peace
prize, lol..
On 9/11/2024 5:03 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 17:05:30 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/7/2024 10:19 AM, Ralph Mowery wrote:
In article <672cd48a$1$2385539$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
user@example.net says...
Trump's main message is not "small government" it's a chicken in every >>>>> pot and trading freedom for security. This used to be the Dem's main >>>>> selling point...
It seems the parties are reversing the ideas.
Appropriating some left-wing populist ideas and making them meaner has
been a right-wing thing for a while.
But though Trump tries to be everything to everyone, at least he has a
brand, a coherent message of a sort.
Lately the Dems have just been a rather generic centrist party whose
message such as it is, is that we'll be business-as-usual, keep the cash >>> and money flowing overseas, keep a bunch of Trumps policies, but at
least not be him. It's insufficient.
Anyway, maybe there should have been a primary.....
You can't tell me that Hopeless Harris was the best the Dems had to
offer.
Obviously not. You are a right-wing lunatic, and not susceptible to
rational argument.
They threw away their chance with this pick. Having the
prospect of the 'first black woman ever to be US president' might
sound grand to you or your cohort, but it's utterly meaningless to
folks who care more about their pocket-book than the colour or gender
of a candidate. As someone once said, "It's the economy, stupid."
The economy was actually doing fine under Biden, but the inflation
caused by the Covid-19 pandemic meant that regular citizens didn't
realise this, and it's not an easy idea to get across.
Trying to do it in a late-starting campaign doesn't seem to have been
seen as practicable.
On 9/11/2024 5:10 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 10:18:09 -0500, Ralph Mowery
<rmowery42@charter.net> wrote:
In article <sa0oij1ka6s1pfpghsar1hse7c2s7d7s54@4ax.com>, jl@glen--
canyon.com says...
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that
we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
Of all the major crime going on in the city they go after one pet
squirrel. Seems about right for the mentaliy of this country. The
squirrel was easy to find. Trapped in just a few rooms. Maybe they
should give the man harboring the squirrel a few years in prison for
doing something so serious of a crime.Don't worry about the thousands of >>> illeagal people in the city.
Ignorant people like Bill Sloman think that squirrels are just rats
with a bushy tail, but they are *way* more intelligent and social.
Squirrels and rats are both rodents, and both are moderately social
animals - rats more so than squirrels.
https://critterstop.com/post/can-rats-and-squirrels-live-together-understanding-their-coexistence-in-urban-environments/
Cursitor Doom is remarkably ignorant, and doesn't seem to have any idea
quite how ignorant he really is.
They're easy to tame and enjoy human company. And they care about each
other more than a lot of humans do.This short clip is very touching
and shows this not untypical behaviour:
Snipped the usual sentimental nonsense.
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque
control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
On 9/11/2024 4:51 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 9 Nov 2024 15:26:02 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vgmo98$3jlbv$1@dont-email.me>:
On 9/11/2024 4:50 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 07 Nov 2024 06:41:58 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
[...]
Will Trump be shot?
I'd say he remains in grave peril. I don't trust the CIA goons. He
should surround himself with the 'wall of meat' the Bikers for Trump
offered him, augmented by a few Oathkeepers for good measure. It was
the CIA that whacked JFK - as I assume everyone knows now.
Only the conspiracy theory nuts like Cursitor Doom who like their
demented conspiracy theories to be totally implausible.
I would expect somebody of your age to have understood a bit more of how the US works,
peace is a danger to their weapon factories and supporting industry.
Reagan was shot at too.. Imagine peace with Russia.
What you are actually expecting is that I'm just as demented as you are >because I'm of a similar age. Dementia doesn't work that way.
Lunatics like you have a wide variety of silly idea. People who haven't >developed the disorder don't.
On a sunny day (Sat, 9 Nov 2024 23:33:52 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman ><bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vgnkrv$3p31a$2@dont-email.me>:
On 9/11/2024 4:51 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 9 Nov 2024 15:26:02 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vgmo98$3jlbv$1@dont-email.me>:
On 9/11/2024 4:50 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 07 Nov 2024 06:41:58 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>>> wrote:
[...]
Will Trump be shot?
I'd say he remains in grave peril. I don't trust the CIA goons. He
should surround himself with the 'wall of meat' the Bikers for Trump >>>>> offered him, augmented by a few Oathkeepers for good measure. It was >>>>> the CIA that whacked JFK - as I assume everyone knows now.
Only the conspiracy theory nuts like Cursitor Doom who like their
demented conspiracy theories to be totally implausible.
I would expect somebody of your age to have understood a bit more of how the US works,
peace is a danger to their weapon factories and supporting industry.
Reagan was shot at too.. Imagine peace with Russia.
What you are actually expecting is that I'm just as demented as you are >>because I'm of a similar age. Dementia doesn't work that way.
Lunatics like you have a wide variety of silly idea. People who haven't >>developed the disorder don't.
I know you left here and are now hanging upside down down-under
to prevent peeing out your brain cells,
but it proves that method does not really work.
So keep it up!
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
We'll never know what Nancy said to get Joe to quit. ProbablyI hope DT will make a victory lap of the USA and adbicate to Vance. >>>>>>>Dream on. Biden had some sense (far too late) to bow out but there's no >>>>>>> way Trump is turning over the keys to Vance, or anyone else, easy. >>>>>>
threatened to put his entire family in prison.
It was insane to have old Joe in the WH given the state he was in.
Seems the US only woke up to his deterioration in that first live TV >>>>> debate with Trump. But it was no secret to the rest of us that he'd
been in a bad way for at least 2 years before that. The MSM covered
for him very well. Can you imagine them doing that for Trump? This is >>>>> why fewer and fewer people pay any attention to the legacy media
nowadays and get their news from other sources. Zerohedge has run some >>>>> amazing exposes that were vehemently denied and mocked by the MSM -
but they were subsequently proven 100% correct. They've saved my lilly >>>>> white arse more than once, in fact.
Definitely not, we'll get to watch every gory detail of the succession >>>> crisis (and it's already happening.) The vultures are already circling. >>>>
I've got my popcorn stocked up..
I think you may be in luck. They'll find a way to thwart Trump and the
will of the people yet.
Trump doesn't need much thwarting. His first term made it blindingly
obvious that he lacks the political skills to make things happen on
large scale. During the Covid-19 epidemic he made it obvious how his
intellectual defects made it difficult for him to do anything much, and
quite a few more Americans died of Covid-19 than woukd have done if he'd
been more competent.
These bastards are utterly ruthless and will
stop at literally nothing to get their way.
With Trump, they don't have to. He'll hang himself out to dry.
But they're no friends of yours, either. Whatever utopia you may be dreaming
of if Trump's out of the picture, you won't find it delivered by THEM.
Nobody's dreaming of any utopia - the word means "no place".
"It literally translates as "no place", coming from the Greek: ??
("not") and ????? ("place"), and meant any non-existent society, when
'described in considerable detail'.
America would probably be run better if Trump was out of the picture,
but a century of ant-union and - incidentally, but necessarily,
anti-socialist - propaganda means that it unlikely to be as well run as
most of Europe with universal health care, good education for all and
less economic inequality. The biggest improvement would probably come
from making it more difficult for billionaires to spend loads of money
on helping politicians they like.
Universal health care is *hugely* expensive. The only reason those
Europeans can - just about - afford it is because the US has been
paying for their defense for decades. When they finally have to pay
for their own, you can expect vicious cuts to those benefits.
Trump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by
the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able
to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential
election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers,
you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition
movement? What a guy!
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:46:22 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 9/11/2024 5:03 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 17:05:30 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/7/2024 10:19 AM, Ralph Mowery wrote:
In article <672cd48a$1$2385539$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
user@example.net says...
Trump's main message is not "small government" it's a chicken in every >>>>>> pot and trading freedom for security. This used to be the Dem's main >>>>>> selling point...
It seems the parties are reversing the ideas.
Appropriating some left-wing populist ideas and making them meaner has >>>> been a right-wing thing for a while.
But though Trump tries to be everything to everyone, at least he has a >>>> brand, a coherent message of a sort.
Lately the Dems have just been a rather generic centrist party whose
message such as it is, is that we'll be business-as-usual, keep the cash >>>> and money flowing overseas, keep a bunch of Trumps policies, but at
least not be him. It's insufficient.
Anyway, maybe there should have been a primary.....
You can't tell me that Hopeless Harris was the best the Dems had to
offer.
Obviously not. You are a right-wing lunatic, and not susceptible to
rational argument.
They threw away their chance with this pick. Having the
prospect of the 'first black woman ever to be US president' might
sound grand to you or your cohort, but it's utterly meaningless to
folks who care more about their pocket-book than the colour or gender
of a candidate. As someone once said, "It's the economy, stupid."
The economy was actually doing fine under Biden, but the inflation
caused by the Covid-19 pandemic meant that regular citizens didn't
realise this, and it's not an easy idea to get across.
Especially since there are 75 million developmentally subnormal people
in the US, as Bill believes.
The pandemic did *not* cause the inflation. THAT was generated
directly as a result of the ludicrous response to the pandemic by
various governments across the world who should have simply let the
damn thing rip.
But that's governments for you: always sticking their
noses in and making everything 10X worse. The Gipper was dead right.
On Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:37:45 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque >>control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/cartoons/mrz111024dAPR-800x0.jpg
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
We'll never know what Nancy said to get Joe to quit. ProbablyI hope DT will make a victory lap of the USA and adbicate to Vance. >>>>>>>>Dream on. Biden had some sense (far too late) to bow out but there's no
way Trump is turning over the keys to Vance, or anyone else, easy. >>>>>>>
threatened to put his entire family in prison.
It was insane to have old Joe in the WH given the state he was in. >>>>>> Seems the US only woke up to his deterioration in that first live TV >>>>>> debate with Trump. But it was no secret to the rest of us that he'd >>>>>> been in a bad way for at least 2 years before that. The MSM covered >>>>>> for him very well. Can you imagine them doing that for Trump? This is >>>>>> why fewer and fewer people pay any attention to the legacy media
nowadays and get their news from other sources. Zerohedge has run some >>>>>> amazing exposes that were vehemently denied and mocked by the MSM - >>>>>> but they were subsequently proven 100% correct. They've saved my lilly >>>>>> white arse more than once, in fact.
Definitely not, we'll get to watch every gory detail of the succession >>>>> crisis (and it's already happening.) The vultures are already circling. >>>>>
I've got my popcorn stocked up..
I think you may be in luck. They'll find a way to thwart Trump and the >>>> will of the people yet.
Trump doesn't need much thwarting. His first term made it blindingly
obvious that he lacks the political skills to make things happen on
large scale. During the Covid-19 epidemic he made it obvious how his
intellectual defects made it difficult for him to do anything much, and
quite a few more Americans died of Covid-19 than woukd have done if he'd >>> been more competent.
These bastards are utterly ruthless and will
stop at literally nothing to get their way.
With Trump, they don't have to. He'll hang himself out to dry.
But they're no friends of yours, either. Whatever utopia you may be dreaming
of if Trump's out of the picture, you won't find it delivered by THEM.
Nobody's dreaming of any utopia - the word means "no place".
"It literally translates as "no place", coming from the Greek: ??
("not") and ????? ("place"), and meant any non-existent society, when
'described in considerable detail'.
America would probably be run better if Trump was out of the picture,
but a century of ant-union and - incidentally, but necessarily,
anti-socialist - propaganda means that it unlikely to be as well run as
most of Europe with universal health care, good education for all and
less economic inequality. The biggest improvement would probably come >>>from making it more difficult for billionaires to spend loads of money
on helping politicians they like.
Universal health care is *hugely* expensive. The only reason those
Europeans can - just about - afford it is because the US has been
paying for their defense for decades. When they finally have to pay
for their own, you can expect vicious cuts to those benefits.
Twaddle. Universal healthcare is cheaper than what the US has - their
system costs half as much again per head as the most expensive European >systems, and doesn't work as well as the appreciably cheaper English
NHS.
The vicious cuts are in the most expensive procedures - most of the
money is spent on the last eighteen months of life, and you can save a
lot by going over to palliative care somewhat earlier.
Trump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by
the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able >>> to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential
election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers,
you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition
movement? What a guy!
There was no master mind involved. Trump ran for the Republican
nomination as an ego trip, and was vastly surprised when he won it.
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 17:32:38 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 9/11/2024 5:10 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 10:18:09 -0500, Ralph Mowery
<rmowery42@charter.net> wrote:
In article <sa0oij1ka6s1pfpghsar1hse7c2s7d7s54@4ax.com>, jl@glen--
canyon.com says...
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that >>>>> we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
Of all the major crime going on in the city they go after one pet
squirrel. Seems about right for the mentaliy of this country. The
squirrel was easy to find. Trapped in just a few rooms. Maybe they
should give the man harboring the squirrel a few years in prison for
doing something so serious of a crime.Don't worry about the thousands of >>>> illeagal people in the city.
Ignorant people like Bill Sloman think that squirrels are just rats
with a bushy tail, but they are *way* more intelligent and social.
Squirrels and rats are both rodents, and both are moderately social
animals - rats more so than squirrels.
https://critterstop.com/post/can-rats-and-squirrels-live-together-understanding-their-coexistence-in-urban-environments/
Cursitor Doom is remarkably ignorant, and doesn't seem to have any idea
quite how ignorant he really is.
They're easy to tame and enjoy human company. And they care about each
other more than a lot of humans do.This short clip is very touching
and shows this not untypical behaviour:
Snipped the usual sentimental nonsense.
No need to keep proving you're a psychopath, Bill; we already know
that.
On Sat, 09 Nov 2024 05:51:14 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 9 Nov 2024 15:26:02 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vgmo98$3jlbv$1@dont-email.me>:
On 9/11/2024 4:50 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 07 Nov 2024 06:41:58 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
[...]
Will Trump be shot?
I'd say he remains in grave peril. I don't trust the CIA goons. He
should surround himself with the 'wall of meat' the Bikers for Trump
offered him, augmented by a few Oathkeepers for good measure. It was
the CIA that whacked JFK - as I assume everyone knows now.
Only the conspiracy theory nuts like Cursitor Doom who like their
demented conspiracy theories to be totally implausible.
I would expect somebo[d]y of your age to have understood a bit more of how the YouAsh works,
peace is a danger to their weapon factories and supporting industry.
Reagan was shot at too.. Imagine peace with Russia.
As expected, Team Trump have announced they will not be supporting
Ukraine, thank god. That could have turned *very* nasty indeed.
In fact it's interesting to note that the price of gold fell
substantially on the outcome of the US election. Gold has been rising
of late due to the increase in international tension. When Trump won,
that was interpreted as a positive signal for peace by the precious
metals markets.
Of course you'll have damn fools like Bill SlomanThey aren't staking their cash on peace with Russia - rather on an international environment that is going to be more oligarch-friendly
who'll try to tell you differently, but investors are staking their
own cash on peace with Russia and you can't get a more reliable and
genuine guide than that.
On Sat, 09 Nov 2024 07:03:55 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:37:45 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>wrote:
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque >>>control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/cartoons/mrz111024dAPR-800x0.jpg
I like the noticeboard. :-)
On Sat, 09 Nov 2024 16:19:08 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 09 Nov 2024 07:03:55 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:37:45 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>wrote:
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque >>>>control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/cartoons/mrz111024dAPR-800x0.jpg
I like the noticeboard. :-)
I used to hurry home after school to see Rocky and Bullwinkle in TV.
Boris: Vell, ve iss foiled again by moose and squirrel.
Natasha: Vat ve do now, buy tickets and go home?
Boris: No, ve STEAL tickets and go home.
On Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:37:45 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque
control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/cartoons/mrz111024dAPR-800x0.jpg
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:59:54 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Trump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by >>>> the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able >>>> to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential >>>> election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers, >>>> you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition
movement? What a guy!
There was no master mind involved. Trump ran for the Republican
nomination as an ego trip, and was vastly surprised when he won it.
I don't know how you come by the idea that Trump is an egoist. He's
always presented as extremely modest and unassuming IMO.
On Sat, 09 Nov 2024 08:53:14 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Sat, 09 Nov 2024 16:19:08 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 09 Nov 2024 07:03:55 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:37:45 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque >>>>> control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/cartoons/mrz111024dAPR-800x0.jpg
I like the noticeboard. :-)
I used to hurry home after school to see Rocky and Bullwinkle in TV.
Boris: Vell, ve iss foiled again by moose and squirrel.
Natasha: Vat ve do now, buy tickets and go home?
Boris: No, ve STEAL tickets and go home.
Yeah, that was a classic cartoon for sure. Still enjoyed it as an
adult.
On 10/11/2024 3:16 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:59:54 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
<snip>
Trump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by >>>>> the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able >>>>> to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential >>>>> election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers, >>>>> you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition
movement? What a guy!
There was no master mind involved. Trump ran for the Republican
nomination as an ego trip, and was vastly surprised when he won it.
I don't know how you come by the idea that Trump is an egoist. He's
always presented as extremely modest and unassuming IMO.
John Larkin is of roughly the same opinion - and he's another narcissist.
On 10/11/2024 4:25 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 09 Nov 2024 08:53:14 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Sat, 09 Nov 2024 16:19:08 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 09 Nov 2024 07:03:55 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:37:45 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>>> wrote:
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque >>>>>> control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/cartoons/mrz111024dAPR-800x0.jpg
I like the noticeboard. :-)
I used to hurry home after school to see Rocky and Bullwinkle in TV.
Boris: Vell, ve iss foiled again by moose and squirrel.
Natasha: Vat ve do now, buy tickets and go home?
Boris: No, ve STEAL tickets and go home.
Yeah, that was a classic cartoon for sure. Still enjoyed it as an
adult.
Cursitor Doom imagines that he is an adult. He's old enough that he
ought to be, but - like Jan Panteltje - he never made it.
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:51:27 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 10/11/2024 3:16 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:59:54 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>> wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
<snip>
Trump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by >>>>>> the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able >>>>>> to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential >>>>>> election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers, >>>>>> you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition
movement? What a guy!
There was no master mind involved. Trump ran for the Republican
nomination as an ego trip, and was vastly surprised when he won it.
I don't know how you come by the idea that Trump is an egoist. He's
always presented as extremely modest and unassuming IMO.
John Larkin is of roughly the same opinion - and he's another narcissist.
Well thank heavens that's one character trait you don't suffer from,
Bill. ;->
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:51:27 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 10/11/2024 3:16 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:59:54 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>> wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
<snip>
Trump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by >>>>>> the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able >>>>>> to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential >>>>>> election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers, >>>>>> you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition
movement? What a guy!
There was no master mind involved. Trump ran for the Republican
nomination as an ego trip, and was vastly surprised when he won it.
I don't know how you come by the idea that Trump is an egoist. He's
always presented as extremely modest and unassuming IMO.
John Larkin is of roughly the same opinion - and he's another narcissist.
Well thank heavens that's one character trait you don't suffer from,
Bill. ;->
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:18:53 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:51:27 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>wrote:
On 10/11/2024 3:16 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:59:54 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>> wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
<snip>
Trump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by >>>>>>> the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able
to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential >>>>>>> election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers, >>>>>>> you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition
movement? What a guy!
There was no master mind involved. Trump ran for the Republican
nomination as an ego trip, and was vastly surprised when he won it.
I don't know how you come by the idea that Trump is an egoist. He's
always presented as extremely modest and unassuming IMO.
John Larkin is of roughly the same opinion - and he's another narcissist.
Well thank heavens that's one character trait you don't suffer from,
Bill. ;->
PLEASE stop feeding Sloman. He is a major contributor to driving
people away.
On 10/11/2024 11:18 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:51:27 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 10/11/2024 3:16 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:Well thank heavens that's one character trait you don't suffer from,
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:59:54 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>> wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
<snip>
Trump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by >>>>>>> the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able
to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential >>>>>>> election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers, >>>>>>> you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition
movement? What a guy!
There was no master mind involved. Trump ran for the Republican
nomination as an ego trip, and was vastly surprised when he won it.
I don't know how you come by the idea that Trump is an egoist. He's
always presented as extremely modest and unassuming IMO.
John Larkin is of roughly the same opinion - and he's another narcissist. >>
Bill. ;->
It does seem to be trait that nobody imagines that they embody. Since my >reaction when somebody says something nice about me is to look out for
the nasty job that they are about to lumber me with, I imagine that I'm >probably not a narcissist, but I could be wrong.
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:18:53 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:51:27 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 10/11/2024 3:16 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:Well thank heavens that's one character trait you don't suffer from,
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:59:54 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>> wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
<snip>
Trump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by >>>>>>> the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able
to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential >>>>>>> election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers, >>>>>>> you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition
movement? What a guy!
There was no master mind involved. Trump ran for the Republican
nomination as an ego trip, and was vastly surprised when he won it.
I don't know how you come by the idea that Trump is an egoist. He's
always presented as extremely modest and unassuming IMO.
John Larkin is of roughly the same opinion - and he's another narcissist. >>
Bill. ;->
PLEASE stop feeding Sloman. He is a major contributor to driving
people away.
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 00:56:25 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 10/11/2024 11:18 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:51:27 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 10/11/2024 3:16 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:59:54 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Well thank heavens that's one character trait you don't suffer from,
Bill. ;->
It does seem to be trait that nobody imagines that they embody. Since my
reaction when somebody says something nice about me is to look out for
the nasty job that they are about to lumber me with, I imagine that I'm
probably not a narcissist, but I could be wrong.
Two points here, Bill: when does *anyone* *ever* say anything nice
about you?
Secondly, narcissism is a hallmark of psychopathy.
Get someone to check you off against Dr. Robert Hare's Psychopathy
Checklist and you might learn something unusual about yourself you're currently unaware of.
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 07:34:47 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:18:53 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:51:27 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>wrote:
On 10/11/2024 3:16 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:Well thank heavens that's one character trait you don't suffer from, >>>Bill. ;->
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:59:54 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
<snip>
I don't know how you come by the idea that Trump is an egoist. He'sTrump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by
the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able
to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential >>>>>>>> election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers, >>>>>>>> you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition
movement? What a guy!
There was no master mind involved. Trump ran for the Republican
nomination as an ego trip, and was vastly surprised when he won it. >>>>>
always presented as extremely modest and unassuming IMO.
John Larkin is of roughly the same opinion - and he's another narcissist. >>>
PLEASE stop feeding Sloman. He is a major contributor to driving
people away.
Sigh... Yes, I will. However, you *really* should lead by example here
and stop feeding him yourself. I've noticed you provide him with a
pretty rich diet. So I'll do a deal with you (not that the last one >concerning a burger and fries got me very far, but still) if you cease
to respond to Bill's barbs, I'll do likewise. Agreed? In the interests
of group harmony, please consider making the sacrifice along with me.
In article <sa0oij1ka6s1pfpghsar1hse7c2s7d7s54@4ax.com>, jl@glen--
canyon.com says...
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that
we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
Of all the major crime going on in the city they go after one pet
squirrel.
On 2024-11-07, Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> wrote:
In article <sa0oij1ka6s1pfpghsar1hse7c2s7d7s54@4ax.com>, jl@glen--
canyon.com says...
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that
we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
Of all the major crime going on in the city they go after one pet
squirrel.
It wasn't about "crime" it was about an animal bite.
There are no non-fatal tests for rabies in humans or animals
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 17:49:46 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 07:34:47 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:18:53 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:51:27 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 3:16 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:Well thank heavens that's one character trait you don't suffer from,
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:59:54 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
<snip>
I don't know how you come by the idea that Trump is an egoist. He's >>>>>> always presented as extremely modest and unassuming IMO.Trump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by
the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able
to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential
election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers,
you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition >>>>>>>> movement? What a guy!
There was no master mind involved. Trump ran for the Republican
nomination as an ego trip, and was vastly surprised when he won it. >>>>>>
John Larkin is of roughly the same opinion - and he's another narcissist. >>>>
Bill. ;->
PLEASE stop feeding Sloman. He is a major contributor to driving
people away.
Sigh... Yes, I will. However, you *really* should lead by example here
and stop feeding him yourself. I've noticed you provide him with a
pretty rich diet. So I'll do a deal with you (not that the last one
concerning a burger and fries got me very far, but still) if you cease
to respond to Bill's barbs, I'll do likewise. Agreed? In the interests
of group harmony, please consider making the sacrifice along with me.
Feeding him?
I had been trying, roughly once a year, to engage him on not-personal
issues, like electronics even, but it doesn't help. He keeps getting
nastier.
Haven't you noticed that he insults everyone? Badly.
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 04:10:52 -0000 (UTC), Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:
On 2024-11-07, Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> wrote:
In article <sa0oij1ka6s1pfpghsar1hse7c2s7d7s54@4ax.com>, jl@glen--
canyon.com says...
Of all the major crime going on in the city they go after one pet
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that
we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
squirrel.
It wasn't about "crime" it was about an animal bite.
There are no non-fatal tests for rabies in humans or animals.
Squirrels almost never get rabies.
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque
control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
On a sunny day (Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:37:45 +0000) it happened Cursitor Doom ><cd@notformail.com> wrote in <7hmiijtl3rvef23g21qip2l27gg8tu12uu@4ax.com>:
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque >>control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
I could no longer watch Makala Harry (or whatever her name) on CNN and wondered why...
It reminds me (her face) of a donkey!!
Now that is one thing, being a donkey, she cannot help, be blamed for,
but the question is: Who rides it?
And with the US Military Complex (the one that helps is-a-hell commit genocide on Palestinians) riding her 4 sure a nuclear ...
escalation
Or maybe a new civil war in the US...
or both
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 17:49:46 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 07:34:47 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:18:53 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:51:27 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>wrote:
On 10/11/2024 3:16 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:Well thank heavens that's one character trait you don't suffer from, >>>>Bill. ;->
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:59:54 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
<snip>
I don't know how you come by the idea that Trump is an egoist. He's >>>>>> always presented as extremely modest and unassuming IMO.Trump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by
the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able
to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential
election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers,
you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition >>>>>>>> movement? What a guy!
There was no master mind involved. Trump ran for the Republican
nomination as an ego trip, and was vastly surprised when he won it. >>>>>>
John Larkin is of roughly the same opinion - and he's another narcissist. >>>>
PLEASE stop feeding Sloman. He is a major contributor to driving
people away.
Sigh... Yes, I will. However, you *really* should lead by example here
and stop feeding him yourself. I've noticed you provide him with a
pretty rich diet. So I'll do a deal with you (not that the last one >>concerning a burger and fries got me very far, but still) if you cease
to respond to Bill's barbs, I'll do likewise. Agreed? In the interests
of group harmony, please consider making the sacrifice along with me.
Feeding him?
I had been trying, roughly once a year, to engage him on not-personal
issues, like electronics even, but it doesn't help. He keeps getting
nastier.
Haven't you noticed that he insults everyone? Badly.
On 11/11/2024 2:34 am, john larkin wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:18:53 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:51:27 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 10/11/2024 3:16 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:Well thank heavens that's one character trait you don't suffer from,
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:59:54 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
<snip>
I don't know how you come by the idea that Trump is an egoist. He'sTrump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by
the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able
to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential >>>>>>>> election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers, >>>>>>>> you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition
movement? What a guy!
There was no master mind involved. Trump ran for the Republican
nomination as an ego trip, and was vastly surprised when he won it. >>>>>
always presented as extremely modest and unassuming IMO.
John Larkin is of roughly the same opinion - and he's another narcissist. >>>
Bill. ;->
PLEASE stop feeding Sloman. He is a major contributor to driving
people away.
In the sense that I don't give John Larkin the flattery he feels he
deserves, which leaves him feeling insulted, so he figures that
everybody else feels equally hurt.
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 04:10:52 -0000 (UTC), Jasen Betts ><usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:
On 2024-11-07, Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> wrote:
In article <sa0oij1ka6s1pfpghsar1hse7c2s7d7s54@4ax.com>, jl@glen--
canyon.com says...
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that
we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
Of all the major crime going on in the city they go after one pet
squirrel.
It wasn't about "crime" it was about an animal bite.
There are no non-fatal tests for rabies in humans or animals
Squirrels almost never get rabies.
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 19:26:30 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 17:49:46 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 07:34:47 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:18:53 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>>wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:51:27 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>wrote:
On 10/11/2024 3:16 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:Well thank heavens that's one character trait you don't suffer from, >>>>>Bill. ;->
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:59:54 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
<snip>
I don't know how you come by the idea that Trump is an egoist. He's >>>>>>> always presented as extremely modest and unassuming IMO.Trump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by
the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able
to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential
election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers,
you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition >>>>>>>>> movement? What a guy!
There was no master mind involved. Trump ran for the Republican >>>>>>>> nomination as an ego trip, and was vastly surprised when he won it. >>>>>>>
John Larkin is of roughly the same opinion - and he's another narcissist. >>>>>
PLEASE stop feeding Sloman. He is a major contributor to driving
people away.
Sigh... Yes, I will. However, you *really* should lead by example here >>>and stop feeding him yourself. I've noticed you provide him with a
pretty rich diet. So I'll do a deal with you (not that the last one >>>concerning a burger and fries got me very far, but still) if you cease
to respond to Bill's barbs, I'll do likewise. Agreed? In the interests
of group harmony, please consider making the sacrifice along with me.
Feeding him?
I had been trying, roughly once a year, to engage him on not-personal >>issues, like electronics even, but it doesn't help. He keeps getting >>nastier.
Haven't you noticed that he insults everyone? Badly.
His limited vocabulary kind of lets him down on that front. Perhaps in
the old days it was more expansive, I can't recall.
Anyway, let's agree to just not respond to him. Both of us. Let's just
not feed him any more. Deal?
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 20:38:14 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 04:10:52 -0000 (UTC), Jasen Betts
<usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:
On 2024-11-07, Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> wrote:
In article <sa0oij1ka6s1pfpghsar1hse7c2s7d7s54@4ax.com>, jl@glen--
canyon.com says...
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that >>>>> we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
Of all the major crime going on in the city they go after one pet
squirrel.
It wasn't about "crime" it was about an animal bite.
There are no non-fatal tests for rabies in humans or animals
Squirrels almost never get rabies.
And yet those demonic Democrats murdered him anyway.
What a bunch of jerks.
This is precisely the kind of petty town hall interference that
Trump needs to break up and destroy.
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 19:26:30 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 17:49:46 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 07:34:47 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:18:53 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:51:27 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 3:16 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:59:54 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
<snip>
I don't know how you come by the idea that Trump is an egoist. He's >>>>>>> always presented as extremely modest and unassuming IMO.Trump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by
the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able
to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential
election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers,
you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition >>>>>>>>> movement? What a guy!
There was no master mind involved. Trump ran for the Republican >>>>>>>> nomination as an ego trip, and was vastly surprised when he won it. >>>>>>>
John Larkin is of roughly the same opinion - and he's another narcissist.
Well thank heavens that's one character trait you don't suffer from, >>>>> Bill. ;->
PLEASE stop feeding Sloman. He is a major contributor to driving
people away.
Sigh... Yes, I will. However, you *really* should lead by example here
and stop feeding him yourself. I've noticed you provide him with a
pretty rich diet. So I'll do a deal with you (not that the last one
concerning a burger and fries got me very far, but still) if you cease
to respond to Bill's barbs, I'll do likewise. Agreed? In the interests
of group harmony, please consider making the sacrifice along with me.
Feeding him?
I had been trying, roughly once a year, to engage him on not-personal
issues, like electronics even, but it doesn't help. He keeps getting
nastier.
Haven't you noticed that he insults everyone? Badly.
His limited vocabulary kind of lets him down on that front. Perhaps in
the old days it was more expansive, I can't recall.
Anyway, let's agree to just not respond to him. Both of us. Let's just
not feed him any more. Deal?
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 14:00:23 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 11/11/2024 2:34 am, john larkin wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:18:53 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:51:27 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 3:16 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:Well thank heavens that's one character trait you don't suffer from,
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:59:54 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
<snip>
I don't know how you come by the idea that Trump is an egoist. He's >>>>>> always presented as extremely modest and unassuming IMO.Trump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by
the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able
to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential
election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers,
you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition >>>>>>>> movement? What a guy!
There was no master mind involved. Trump ran for the Republican
nomination as an ego trip, and was vastly surprised when he won it. >>>>>>
John Larkin is of roughly the same opinion - and he's another narcissist. >>>>
Bill. ;->
PLEASE stop feeding Sloman. He is a major contributor to driving
people away.
In the sense that I don't give John Larkin the flattery he feels he
deserves, which leaves him feeling insulted, so he figures that
everybody else feels equally hurt.
Can you not see that you're projecting (as the pyschiatrists call it)
here, Bill?
You are assuming that JL needs flattery to feel validated
when in reality that's your own need coming through.
Go back 25 years. Be the Bill Sloman of back then.
Then you might just get the sincere
appreciation you clearly crave.
On 11/4/2024 8:56 PM, Hoppy wrote:
On 11/4/24 15:37, Cursitor Doom wrote:
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque
control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
Peanut was abducted and murdered in Republican Chemung County.
As of 2024, the Chemung County Legislature includes 13 Republicans and 2
Democrats.
In presidential elections, Chemung County tends to vote Republican.
In 2016, Donald Trump carried Chemung County with 55.64% of the vote
compared to Hillary Clinton's 38.09%. Trump carried the county again in
2020 with over 55% of the vote.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemung_County,_New_York
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-
peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
Yeah I don't know why people go to the pet store or animal shelter in
the US when the forests are full of all sorts of perfectly good animals,
even coyotes or "forest puppies" as some prefer to call them.
You can just go into any random woods and have your kids pick out the
free dog they like best. Herr Trump has been known to intervene on
behalf of children's forest puppies on several occasions.
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 06:37:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:37:45 +0000) it happened Cursitor Doom >> <cd@notformail.com> wrote in <7hmiijtl3rvef23g21qip2l27gg8tu12uu@4ax.com>: >>
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque
control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
I could no longer watch Makala Harry (or whatever her name) on CNN and wondered why...
It reminds me (her face) of a donkey!!
Now that is one thing, being a donkey, she cannot help, be blamed for,
but the question is: Who rides it?
And with the US Military Complex (the one that helps is-a-hell commit genocide on Palestinians) riding her 4 sure a nuclear ...
escalation
Or maybe a new civil war in the US...
or both
A face like a donkey and a laugh like a hyena.
There's no substance to the woman at all: none.
She's an empty vessel just waiting for the WEF
goons to tell her what to do and say; the perfect puppet for the
Globalists to continue their endless wars.
"Too close to call!" "It's on a knife edge!" Nope. Trump's well ahead
but Harris will eventually be declared the winner. Same steal as last
time, just with a different puppet fronting for the Dems. RIP
democracy.
On 5/11/2024 8:07 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 06:37:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:37:45 +0000) it happened Cursitor Doom >>> <cd@notformail.com> wrote in <7hmiijtl3rvef23g21qip2l27gg8tu12uu@4ax.com>: >>>
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque
control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
I could no longer watch Makala Harry (or whatever her name) on CNN and wondered why...
It reminds me (her face) of a donkey!!
Now that is one thing, being a donkey, she cannot help, be blamed for,
but the question is: Who rides it?
And with the US Military Complex (the one that helps is-a-hell commit genocide on Palestinians) riding her 4 sure a nuclear ...
escalation
Or maybe a new civil war in the US...
or both
A face like a donkey and a laugh like a hyena.
Whereas Cursitor Doom is a completely anonymous troll.
There's no substance to the woman at all: none.
An implausible claim. Insubstantial people don't have her history.
Cursitor Doom - as an anonymous troll has no history at all.
She's an empty vessel just waiting for the WEF
goons to tell her what to do and say; the perfect puppet for the
Globalists to continue their endless wars.
There's rather more to her than Trump. At least she doesn't admire Putin
and Kim Jong Un.
"Too close to call!" "It's on a knife edge!" Nope. Trump's well ahead
but Harris will eventually be declared the winner. Same steal as last
time, just with a different puppet fronting for the Dems. RIP
democracy.
So Cursitor Doom's intuition is a more reliable guide to outcome of the
US presidential election than all the expensive polls?
Trump does like to claim that the 2020 US election was "stolen", but
every time he tried to get the case argued in court he lost.
He's likely to make the same claim again, if he loses, but he's been a
liar all his life. Cursitor Doom does like thoroughly implausible lies,
so he tout's Trump's claims, which must be music to his ears.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 23:52:15 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>...
wrote:
On 5/11/2024 8:07 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 06:37:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:37:45 +0000) it happened Cursitor Doom >>>> <cd@notformail.com> wrote in <7hmiijtl3rvef23g21qip2l27gg8tu12uu@4ax.com>: >>>>
Trump does like to claim that the 2020 US election was "stolen", but
every time he tried to get the case argued in court he lost.
Gee, I wonder why?
He's likely to make the same claim again, if he loses, but he's been a
liar all his life. Cursitor Doom does like thoroughly implausible lies,
so he tout's Trump's claims, which must be music to his ears.
I called out the last election as a fix long before Trump ever stated
it, Bill. Do try to keep up.
You typify the Left's callous indifference
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 00:30:47 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/4/2024 8:56 PM, Hoppy wrote:
On 11/4/24 15:37, Cursitor Doom wrote:
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque
control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
Peanut was abducted and murdered in Republican Chemung County.
As of 2024, the Chemung County Legislature includes 13 Republicans and 2 >>> Democrats.
In presidential elections, Chemung County tends to vote Republican.
In 2016, Donald Trump carried Chemung County with 55.64% of the vote
compared to Hillary Clinton's 38.09%. Trump carried the county again in
2020 with over 55% of the vote.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemung_County,_New_York
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-
peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
Yeah I don't know why people go to the pet store or animal shelter in
the US when the forests are full of all sorts of perfectly good animals,
even coyotes or "forest puppies" as some prefer to call them.
You can just go into any random woods and have your kids pick out the
free dog they like best. Herr Trump has been known to intervene on
behalf of children's forest puppies on several occasions.
You typify the Left's callous indifference to life and death. That
innocent squirrel had his own Youtube channel - with over half a
million followers! They're devastated at the loss of their hero and
many of them were young children. You should be ashamed of yourself.
On 2024-11-05 6:02 a.m., Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 23:52:15 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>...
wrote:
On 5/11/2024 8:07 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 06:37:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:37:45 +0000) it happened
Cursitor Doom
<cd@notformail.com> wrote in
<7hmiijtl3rvef23g21qip2l27gg8tu12uu@4ax.com>:
Trump does like to claim that the 2020 US election was "stolen", but
every time he tried to get the case argued in court he lost.
Gee, I wonder why?
He's likely to make the same claim again, if he loses, but he's been a
liar all his life. Cursitor Doom does like thoroughly implausible lies,
so he tout's Trump's claims, which must be music to his ears.
I called out the last election as a fix long before Trump ever stated
it, Bill. Do try to keep up.
You may recall that when Trump first started running he said he would
not accept the results of an election where he loses because the
Democrats cheat.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/trump-not-technically-saying- hell-refuse-to-accept-election-results-he-just-wont-accept-them-and-has- explained-why/ar-AA1p7vTk
He has never said otherwise in all the years he was president and then
when he lost office. And he has worked tirelessly ever since at making
the US Electorate doubt the integrity of their fellow citizens who run elections.
You must love being patted on the head like other useful idiots. What a
Good Doggie you are!
John
You may recall that when Trump first started running he said he would
not accept the results of an election where he loses because the
Democrats cheat.
On 11/5/2024 10:01 AM, John Robertson wrote:
On 2024-11-05 6:02 a.m., Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 23:52:15 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>...
wrote:
On 5/11/2024 8:07 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 06:37:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>>> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:37:45 +0000) it happened
Cursitor Doom
<cd@notformail.com> wrote in
<7hmiijtl3rvef23g21qip2l27gg8tu12uu@4ax.com>:
Trump does like to claim that the 2020 US election was "stolen", but
every time he tried to get the case argued in court he lost.
Gee, I wonder why?
He's likely to make the same claim again, if he loses, but he's been a >>>> liar all his life. Cursitor Doom does like thoroughly implausible lies, >>>> so he tout's Trump's claims, which must be music to his ears.
I called out the last election as a fix long before Trump ever stated
it, Bill. Do try to keep up.
You may recall that when Trump first started running he said he would
not accept the results of an election where he loses because the
Democrats cheat.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/trump-not-technically-saying-
hell-refuse-to-accept-election-results-he-just-wont-accept-them-and-has-
explained-why/ar-AA1p7vTk
He has never said otherwise in all the years he was president and then
when he lost office. And he has worked tirelessly ever since at making
the US Electorate doubt the integrity of their fellow citizens who run
elections.
You must love being patted on the head like other useful idiots. What a
Good Doggie you are!
John
Live from Philadelphia:
<https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1853620937079300096/pu/vid/avc1/720x1280/cJJ_tU7TtdA7PHGq.mp4?tag=12>
On 11/5/2024 6:28 AM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 00:30:47 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/4/2024 8:56 PM, Hoppy wrote:
On 11/4/24 15:37, Cursitor Doom wrote:
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque >>>>> control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
Peanut was abducted and murdered in Republican Chemung County.
As of 2024, the Chemung County Legislature includes 13 Republicans and 2 >>>> Democrats.
In presidential elections, Chemung County tends to vote Republican.
In 2016, Donald Trump carried Chemung County with 55.64% of the vote
compared to Hillary Clinton's 38.09%. Trump carried the county again in >>>> 2020 with over 55% of the vote.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemung_County,_New_York
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-
peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
Yeah I don't know why people go to the pet store or animal shelter in
the US when the forests are full of all sorts of perfectly good animals, >>> even coyotes or "forest puppies" as some prefer to call them.
You can just go into any random woods and have your kids pick out the
free dog they like best. Herr Trump has been known to intervene on
behalf of children's forest puppies on several occasions.
You typify the Left's callous indifference to life and death. That
innocent squirrel had his own Youtube channel - with over half a
million followers! They're devastated at the loss of their hero and
many of them were young children. You should be ashamed of yourself.
If only it were possible to provoke the same outrage among right-wing >citizens when the authorities "euthanize" random human citizens:
<https://www.statista.com/statistics/585152/people-shot-to-death-by-us-police-by-race/>
How many citizens did the state randomly execute where you're at last year?
Anyway. it's not possible. Worship a cop today like every MAGA does.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:37:18 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/5/2024 10:01 AM, John Robertson wrote:
On 2024-11-05 6:02 a.m., Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 23:52:15 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>...
wrote:
On 5/11/2024 8:07 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 06:37:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:37:45 +0000) it happened
Cursitor Doom
<cd@notformail.com> wrote in
<7hmiijtl3rvef23g21qip2l27gg8tu12uu@4ax.com>:
Trump does like to claim that the 2020 US election was "stolen", but >>>>> every time he tried to get the case argued in court he lost.
Gee, I wonder why?
He's likely to make the same claim again, if he loses, but he's been a >>>>> liar all his life. Cursitor Doom does like thoroughly implausible lies, >>>>> so he tout's Trump's claims, which must be music to his ears.
I called out the last election as a fix long before Trump ever stated
it, Bill. Do try to keep up.
You may recall that when Trump first started running he said he would
not accept the results of an election where he loses because the
Democrats cheat.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/trump-not-technically-saying-
hell-refuse-to-accept-election-results-he-just-wont-accept-them-and-has- >>> explained-why/ar-AA1p7vTk
He has never said otherwise in all the years he was president and then
when he lost office. And he has worked tirelessly ever since at making
the US Electorate doubt the integrity of their fellow citizens who run
elections.
You must love being patted on the head like other useful idiots. What a
Good Doggie you are!
John
Live from Philadelphia:
<https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1853620937079300096/pu/vid/avc1/720x1280/cJJ_tU7TtdA7PHGq.mp4?tag=12>
It's very telling that the only respondents to this thread have been Left-wingers and that not one of them has expressed any sorrow or
regret for the death of this innocent animal, choosing instead to
score political points out of it. Shameful.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 23:52:15 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 5/11/2024 8:07 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 06:37:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:37:45 +0000) it happened Cursitor Doom >>>> <cd@notformail.com> wrote in <7hmiijtl3rvef23g21qip2l27gg8tu12uu@4ax.com>: >>>>
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque >>>>> control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
I could no longer watch Makala Harry (or whatever her name) on CNN and wondered why...
It reminds me (her face) of a donkey!!
Now that is one thing, being a donkey, she cannot help, be blamed for, >>>> but the question is: Who rides it?
And with the US Military Complex (the one that helps is-a-hell commit genocide on Palestinians) riding her 4 sure a nuclear ...
escalation
Or maybe a new civil war in the US...
or both
A face like a donkey and a laugh like a hyena.
Whereas Cursitor Doom is a completely anonymous troll.
Plenty of people here know who I am. Since you said you wanted me
dead, I naturally don't trust you, Bill. I used a screen name because
there are nut-cases out there like you and bitrex who have no regard
for human - or squirrel - life. It's for my personal safety.
There's no substance to the woman at all: none.
An implausible claim. Insubstantial people don't have her history.
Cursitor Doom - as an anonymous troll has no history at all.
So what? I'm not running for president!
She's an empty vessel just waiting for the WEF
goons to tell her what to do and say; the perfect puppet for the
Globalists to continue their endless wars.
There's rather more to her than Trump. At least she doesn't admire Putin
and Kim Jong Un.
"Too close to call!" "It's on a knife edge!" Nope. Trump's well ahead
but Harris will eventually be declared the winner. Same steal as last
time, just with a different puppet fronting for the Dems. RIP
democracy.
So Cursitor Doom's intuition is a more reliable guide to outcome of the
US presidential election than all the expensive polls?
Trump does like to claim that the 2020 US election was "stolen", but
every time he tried to get the case argued in court he lost.
Gee, I wonder why?
He's likely to make the same claim again, if he loses, but he's been a
liar all his life. Cursitor Doom does like thoroughly implausible lies,
so he tout's Trump's claims, which must be music to his ears.
I called out the last election as a fix long before Trump ever stated
it, Bill. Do try to keep up.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:37:18 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/5/2024 10:01 AM, John Robertson wrote:
On 2024-11-05 6:02 a.m., Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 23:52:15 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 5/11/2024 8:07 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 06:37:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>>>> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:37:45 +0000) it happened
Cursitor Doom
It's very telling that the only respondents to this thread have been Left-wingers and that not one of them has expressed any sorrow or
regret for the death of this innocent animal, choosing instead to
score political points out of it. Shameful.
On 6/11/2024 5:12 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:37:18 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/5/2024 10:01 AM, John Robertson wrote:
On 2024-11-05 6:02 a.m., Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 23:52:15 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>> wrote:
On 5/11/2024 8:07 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 06:37:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>>>>> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:37:45 +0000) it happened
Cursitor Doom
<snip>
It's very telling that the only respondents to this thread have been
Left-wingers and that not one of them has expressed any sorrow or
regret for the death of this innocent animal, choosing instead to
score political points out of it. Shameful.
Getting sentimental about tree-rats is the kind of rhetorical nonsense
we can expect from Cursitor Doom.
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque
control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
On 05-Nov-24 7:37 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque
control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
The legislation under which Peanut was seized was enacted in 2004, while George E. Pataki, a Republican, was governor.
Sylvia.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 14:11:57 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 6/11/2024 5:12 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 11:37:18 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/5/2024 10:01 AM, John Robertson wrote:
On 2024-11-05 6:02 a.m., Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 23:52:15 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>> wrote:
On 5/11/2024 8:07 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 05 Nov 2024 06:37:27 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 04 Nov 2024 23:37:45 +0000) it happened >>>>>>>>> Cursitor Doom
<snip>
It's very telling that the only respondents to this thread have been
Left-wingers and that not one of them has expressed any sorrow or
regret for the death of this innocent animal, choosing instead to
score political points out of it. Shameful.
Getting sentimental about tree-rats is the kind of rhetorical nonsense
we can expect from Cursitor Doom.
Another cold, pyschopathic comment. Thankfully the American people
didn't share your indifference and contempt for an innocent creature
and have avenged Peanut's death emphatically. The little guy didn't
die in vain after all. Rejoice!
I pledge to accept the election results as certified by the states. I challenge all other candidates to make the same pledge.
On 11/5/2024 11:06 AM, Crash Gordon wrote:
I pledge to accept the election results as certified by the states. I
challenge all other candidates to make the same pledge.
It turns out this pledge was unnecessary. I did *not* see that coming!
I was sure it would be at least a week before we had definitive results,
that they would be very close, and that there would be multiple challenges.
I am as agog as most democrats at this point.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:09:02 -0600, Crash Gordon <uucp@crashelex.com>challenges.
wrote:
On 11/5/2024 11:06 AM, Crash Gordon wrote:
I pledge to accept the election results as certified by the states. I
challenge all other candidates to make the same pledge.
It turns out this pledge was unnecessary. I did *not* see that coming!
I was sure it would be at least a week before we had definitive results, >>that they would be very close, and that there would be multiple
I am as agog as most democrats at this point.
It was never close. That was just another MSM lie so it would be
easier to fix the result again. But Trump was *so* far ahead that any
fix would have been easily exposed as such. It was just too risky to
even contemplate.
I hope Trump will leave office in 4 years having made the
weaponization of the law for political ends impossible going forward,
because what we have seen has been outrageous abuse of the legal
system in a flagrant attempt to crush any second term for him. We
really have been in banana republic territory of late, what with that
and the assassination attempts.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:09:02 -0600, Crash Gordon <uucp@crashelex.com>The polls were pretty much bang on; that _someone_ would likely sweep
wrote:
On 11/5/2024 11:06 AM, Crash Gordon wrote:
I pledge to accept the election results as certified by the states. I
challenge all other candidates to make the same pledge.
It turns out this pledge was unnecessary. I did *not* see that coming!
I was sure it would be at least a week before we had definitive results,
that they would be very close, and that there would be multiple challenges. >>
I am as agog as most democrats at this point.
It was never close. That was just another MSM lie so it would be
easier to fix the result again. But Trump was *so* far ahead that any
fix would have been easily exposed as such. It was just too risky to
even contemplate.
On 11/6/2024 2:21 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:09:02 -0600, Crash Gordon <uucp@crashelex.com>The polls were pretty much bang on; that _someone_ would likely sweep
wrote:
On 11/5/2024 11:06 AM, Crash Gordon wrote:
I pledge to accept the election results as certified by the states. I >>>> challenge all other candidates to make the same pledge.
It turns out this pledge was unnecessary. I did *not* see that coming!
I was sure it would be at least a week before we had definitive results, >>> that they would be very close, and that there would be multiple challenges. >>>
I am as agog as most democrats at this point.
It was never close. That was just another MSM lie so it would be
easier to fix the result again. But Trump was *so* far ahead that any
fix would have been easily exposed as such. It was just too risky to
even contemplate.
the swing states was known for weeks, months. The scenarios where swing >states got split were statistically unlikely.
Running a candidate like Kamala who had not even a primary mandate and
three months to do a not particularly inspiring campaign up against a >billionaire celebrity like Trump was a big gamble, anyone with a brain
knew that. Did the Democrats? Who can say..
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote in >news:evfnijl4hdba3vec1rgud1frjftjur337a@4ax.com:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:09:02 -0600, Crash Gordon <uucp@crashelex.com>challenges.
wrote:
On 11/5/2024 11:06 AM, Crash Gordon wrote:
I pledge to accept the election results as certified by the states. I >>>> challenge all other candidates to make the same pledge.
It turns out this pledge was unnecessary. I did *not* see that coming!
I was sure it would be at least a week before we had definitive results, >>>that they would be very close, and that there would be multiple
I am as agog as most democrats at this point.
It was never close. That was just another MSM lie so it would be
easier to fix the result again. But Trump was *so* far ahead that any
fix would have been easily exposed as such. It was just too risky to
even contemplate.
I hope Trump will leave office in 4 years having made the
weaponization of the law for political ends impossible going forward,
because what we have seen has been outrageous abuse of the legal
system in a flagrant attempt to crush any second term for him. We
really have been in banana republic territory of late, what with that
and the assassination attempts.
Agreed.
One more very important thing needs to be added to the goals for President >Trump and his team. (IMHO) Bringing both sides together is a nice goal,
but a better goal improving on that idea is to teach all Americans of all >ages the values that created this great country. So that in the future we >might combine our efforts to improve instead of listening to those efforts >that divided us on many false issues. We need to focus on what is
important.
The media will not tell you what that means.
Politicians cannot tell you what that means.
God told us what we need to do. Our Great Founding Fathers new the path.
Amen,
On 11/6/24 13:16, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 05-Nov-24 7:37 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque
control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
The legislation under which Peanut was seized was enacted in 2004, while
George E. Pataki, a Republican, was governor.
Sylvia.
I'm sorry for the squirrel, but if the American voter can be
influenced by such considerations, be afraid. Very afraid.
Jeroen Belleman
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:11:28 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/6/2024 2:21 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:09:02 -0600, Crash Gordon <uucp@crashelex.com>The polls were pretty much bang on; that _someone_ would likely sweep
wrote:
On 11/5/2024 11:06 AM, Crash Gordon wrote:
I pledge to accept the election results as certified by the states. I >>>>> challenge all other candidates to make the same pledge.
It turns out this pledge was unnecessary. I did *not* see that coming! >>>> I was sure it would be at least a week before we had definitive results, >>>> that they would be very close, and that there would be multiple challenges.
I am as agog as most democrats at this point.
It was never close. That was just another MSM lie so it would be
easier to fix the result again. But Trump was *so* far ahead that any
fix would have been easily exposed as such. It was just too risky to
even contemplate.
the swing states was known for weeks, months. The scenarios where swing
states got split were statistically unlikely.
Running a candidate like Kamala who had not even a primary mandate and
three months to do a not particularly inspiring campaign up against a
billionaire celebrity like Trump was a big gamble, anyone with a brain
knew that. Did the Democrats? Who can say..
What would really be interesting is a Cabinet with one guy who was a
poor hillbilly orphan, and another guy who is the richest person on
Earth.
I hope DT will make a victory lap of the USA and adbicate to Vance.
On 11/6/2024 6:14 PM, john larkin wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:11:28 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/6/2024 2:21 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:09:02 -0600, Crash Gordon <uucp@crashelex.com>The polls were pretty much bang on; that _someone_ would likely sweep
wrote:
On 11/5/2024 11:06 AM, Crash Gordon wrote:
I pledge to accept the election results as certified by the states. I >>>>>> challenge all other candidates to make the same pledge.
It turns out this pledge was unnecessary. I did *not* see that coming! >>>>> I was sure it would be at least a week before we had definitive results, >>>>> that they would be very close, and that there would be multiple challenges.
I am as agog as most democrats at this point.
It was never close. That was just another MSM lie so it would be
easier to fix the result again. But Trump was *so* far ahead that any
fix would have been easily exposed as such. It was just too risky to
even contemplate.
the swing states was known for weeks, months. The scenarios where swing
states got split were statistically unlikely.
Running a candidate like Kamala who had not even a primary mandate and
three months to do a not particularly inspiring campaign up against a
billionaire celebrity like Trump was a big gamble, anyone with a brain
knew that. Did the Democrats? Who can say..
What would really be interesting is a Cabinet with one guy who was a
poor hillbilly orphan, and another guy who is the richest person on
Earth.
Vance is an odd duck; seems to believe his mother stealing pills from
her workplace to feed her drug addiction was the fault of somebody other
than herself and Purdue Pharma.
Having Trump, Vance, RFK Jr. and Musk is a hazard, the gravitational
pull of many massive egos in once place is likely to cause a rip in the
space time continuum.
I hope DT will make a victory lap of the USA and adbicate to Vance.
Dream on. Biden had some sense (far too late) to bow out but there's no
way Trump is turning over the keys to Vance, or anyone else, easy.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 15:15:50 +0100, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
On 11/6/24 13:16, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 05-Nov-24 7:37 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque
control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
The legislation under which Peanut was seized was enacted in 2004, while >>> George E. Pataki, a Republican, was governor.
Sylvia.
I'm sorry for the squirrel, but if the American voter can be
influenced by such considerations, be afraid. Very afraid.
Jeroen Belleman
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that
we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
Whether you are a believer or not, The Enlightment started with The
Ten Commandments, the teachings of Jesus, the Gutenberg bible, the >Reformation, the Magna Carta, and the US Constitution as amended.
Religion is the firmware, the axioms, of our morality and law.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 15:15:50 +0100, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
On 11/6/24 13:16, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 05-Nov-24 7:37 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
This is just typical of Democrat control. Today a defenseless
squirrel; tomorrow you or me. That's how these heartless Stalinesque
control freaks operate. For Peanut's sake, vote Trump tomorrow.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/texas-republicans-rally-around-peanut-the-squirrel-in-last-ditch-attempt-for-votes/ar-AA1tuquD
The legislation under which Peanut was seized was enacted in 2004, while >>> George E. Pataki, a Republican, was governor.
Sylvia.
I'm sorry for the squirrel, but if the American voter can be
influenced by such considerations, be afraid. Very afraid.
Jeroen Belleman
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that
we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that
we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
Trump's main message is not "small government" it's a chicken in every
pot and trading freedom for security. This used to be the Dem's main
selling point...
In article <672cd48a$1$2385539$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
user@example.net says...
Trump's main message is not "small government" it's a chicken in every
pot and trading freedom for security. This used to be the Dem's main
selling point...
It seems the parties are reversing the ideas.
On 11/7/2024 10:19 AM, Ralph Mowery wrote:
In article <672cd48a$1$2385539$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
user@example.net says...
Trump's main message is not "small government" it's a chicken in every
pot and trading freedom for security. This used to be the Dem's main
selling point...
It seems the parties are reversing the ideas.
Appropriating some left-wing populist ideas and making them meaner has
been a right-wing thing for a while.
But though Trump tries to be everything to everyone, at least he has a
brand, a coherent message of a sort.
Lately the Dems have just been a rather generic centrist party whose
message such as it is, is that we'll be business-as-usual, keep the cash
and money
In article <sa0oij1ka6s1pfpghsar1hse7c2s7d7s54@4ax.com>, jl@glen--
canyon.com says...
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that
we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
Of all the major crime going on in the city they go after one pet
squirrel. Seems about right for the mentaliy of this country. The
squirrel was easy to find. Trapped in just a few rooms. Maybe they
should give the man harboring the squirrel a few years in prison for
doing something so serious of a crime.Don't worry about the thousands of illeagal people in the city.
On 11/7/24 16:18, Ralph Mowery wrote:
In article <sa0oij1ka6s1pfpghsar1hse7c2s7d7s54@4ax.com>, jl@glen--
canyon.com says...
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that
we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
Of all the major crime going on in the city they go after one pet
squirrel. Seems about right for the mentaliy of this country. The
squirrel was easy to find. Trapped in just a few rooms. Maybe they
should give the man harboring the squirrel a few years in prison for
doing something so serious of a crime.Don't worry about the thousands of
illeagal people in the city.
That was the idea. There are plenty of things wrong in US society,
but the authorities chose to after an easy target and politicians
sought to use it to their advantage. Both parties deserve our scorn.
Jeroen Belleman
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 23:43:52 +0100, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
On 11/7/24 16:18, Ralph Mowery wrote:
In article <sa0oij1ka6s1pfpghsar1hse7c2s7d7s54@4ax.com>, jl@glen--
canyon.com says...
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that
we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
Of all the major crime going on in the city they go after one pet
squirrel. Seems about right for the mentaliy of this country. The
squirrel was easy to find. Trapped in just a few rooms. Maybe they
should give the man harboring the squirrel a few years in prison for
doing something so serious of a crime.Don't worry about the thousands of >>> illeagal people in the city.
That was the idea. There are plenty of things wrong in US society,
but the authorities chose to after an easy target and politicians
sought to use it to their advantage. Both parties deserve our scorn.
Jeroen Belleman
Political parties should have no official existance in the workings of >elections or in government.
The framers of our constitution debated that, and got it wrong.
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 23:43:52 +0100, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
On 11/7/24 16:18, Ralph Mowery wrote:
In article <sa0oij1ka6s1pfpghsar1hse7c2s7d7s54@4ax.com>, jl@glen--
canyon.com says...
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that
we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
Of all the major crime going on in the city they go after one pet
squirrel. Seems about right for the mentality of this country. The
squirrel was easy to find. Trapped in just a few rooms. Maybe they
should give the man harboring the squirrel a few years in prison for
doing something so serious of a crime.Don't worry about the thousands of >>> illegal people in the city.
That was the idea. There are plenty of things wrong in US society,
but the authorities chose to after an easy target and politicians
sought to use it to their advantage. Both parties deserve our scorn.
Political parties should have no official existence in the workings of elections or in government.
The framers of our constitution debated that, and got it wrong.
On Thu, 07 Nov 2024 15:53:27 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 23:43:52 +0100, Jeroen Belleman
<jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
On 11/7/24 16:18, Ralph Mowery wrote:
In article <sa0oij1ka6s1pfpghsar1hse7c2s7d7s54@4ax.com>, jl@glen--
canyon.com says...
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that >>>>> we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
Of all the major crime going on in the city they go after one pet
squirrel. Seems about right for the mentaliy of this country. The
squirrel was easy to find. Trapped in just a few rooms. Maybe they
should give the man harboring the squirrel a few years in prison for
doing something so serious of a crime.Don't worry about the thousands of >>>> illeagal people in the city.
That was the idea. There are plenty of things wrong in US society,
but the authorities chose to after an easy target and politicians
sought to use it to their advantage. Both parties deserve our scorn.
Jeroen Belleman
Political parties should have no official existance in the workings of
elections or in government.
The framers of our constitution debated that, and got it wrong.
They looked at the fractious politics of European parliamentary
systems, which were largely self-crippling, and decided to set things
up so there would be only a few parties, usually two major plus some pipsqueaks. It worked.
European parliamentary systems were pretty rudimentary back in 1786.
They've got a lot better since then. The Australian constitution got set
up in 1901 and missed the cutting edge stuff that the Swedes and the
Dutch worked out a few later. The 1948 German constitution copied them
and seems to work well.
On a sunny day (Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:44:37 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vgjqeg$2t0r1$2@dont-email.me>:
European parliamentary systems were pretty rudimentary back in 1786.
They've got a lot better since then. The Australian constitution got set
up in 1901 and missed the cutting edge stuff that the Swedes and the
Dutch worked out a few later. The 1948 German constitution copied them
and seems to work well.
Australia now wants to ban kids below 16 years of age from participating in / using social media!
Ridiculous!!!
Kangaroos have more freedom there.
On 8/11/2024 5:19 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:44:37 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vgjqeg$2t0r1$2@dont-email.me>:
European parliamentary systems were pretty rudimentary back in 1786.
They've got a lot better since then. The Australian constitution got set >>> up in 1901 and missed the cutting edge stuff that the Swedes and the
Dutch worked out a few later. The 1948 German constitution copied them
and seems to work well.
Australia now wants to ban kids below 16 years of age from participating in / using social media!
Ridiculous!!!
Less ridiculous to the parents of kids who have taken bad advice that
they got from social media.
Kids don't have good judgement - neither do
you - but most of them get wiser as the get older and brain development
settles down. They can't even get married without parental consent.
Kangaroos have more freedom there.
And most Australian kids can spell the word correctly. Kangaroos are
wild animals,
and can't screw up as thoroughly as kids can. They rarely
commit suicide or become anorexic.
On a sunny day (Fri, 8 Nov 2024 23:05:27 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vgkuqi$36je2$1@dont-email.me>:
On 8/11/2024 5:19 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:44:37 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vgjqeg$2t0r1$2@dont-email.me>:
European parliamentary systems were pretty rudimentary back in 1786.
They've got a lot better since then. The Australian constitution got set >>>> up in 1901 and missed the cutting edge stuff that the Swedes and the
Dutch worked out a few later. The 1948 German constitution copied them >>>> and seems to work well.
Australia now wants to ban kids below 16 years of age from participating in / using social media!
Ridiculous!!!
Less ridiculous to the parents of kids who have taken bad advice that
they got from social media.
Would not they have died <and maybe sooner> if left to the control of their parents of environment only?
As soon as kids can read and write they can also swipe a smart phone these days...
They know about google and politics too.
Kids don't have good judgement - neither do
you - but most of them get wiser as the get older and brain development settles down >> settles down. They can't even get married without parental consent.
boring twit!
Kangaroos have more freedom there.
And most Australian kids can spell the word correctly. Kangaroos are
wild animals,
Just testing
and can't screw up as thoroughly as kids can. They rarely
commit suicide or become anorexic.
You just contradicted your own argument.
You never grew up in a city (like me in Amsterdam in the forties and fifties)? > Lots going on there for kids less than 16 years old long beforesocial media existed.
Some died..
Quite possible just those social media and a view of different life styles will
protect the very young kids.
Maybe help them to learn languages, what the world looks like higher than down under...
Other cultures, religions, what not, even electronics...
Amsterdam was fun yesterday, media all over it, pro-Palestinians against Jewish genocide-committing foot-ballers.
On 8/11/2024 11:50 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 8 Nov 2024 23:05:27 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vgkuqi$36je2$1@dont-email.me>:
On 8/11/2024 5:19 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:44:37 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman >>>> <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vgjqeg$2t0r1$2@dont-email.me>:
European parliamentary systems were pretty rudimentary back in 1786. >>>>> They've got a lot better since then. The Australian constitution got set >>>>> up in 1901 and missed the cutting edge stuff that the Swedes and the >>>>> Dutch worked out a few later. The 1948 German constitution copied them >>>>> and seems to work well.
Australia now wants to ban kids below 16 years of age from participating in / using social media!
Ridiculous!!!
Less ridiculous to the parents of kids who have taken bad advice that
they got from social media.
Would not they have died <and maybe sooner> if left to the control of their parents of environment only?
Probably not. There seem to have been more bad outcomes in the last few
years than there were before social media became popular
As soon as kids can read and write they can also swipe a smart phone these days...
They know about google and politics too.
But they mostly can't afford smart phones.
Kids don't have good judgement - neither do
you - but most of them get wiser as the get older and brain development settles down >> settles down. They can't even get
married without parental consent.
boring twit!
You seem to be the twit here. I'm not to boring to reply to.
Kangaroos have more freedom there.
And most Australian kids can spell the word correctly. Kangaroos are
wild animals,
Just testing
Pull the other leg.
and can't screw up as thoroughly as kids can. They rarely
commit suicide or become anorexic.
You just contradicted your own argument.
But you can't spell out how.
You never grew up in a city (like me in Amsterdam in the forties and fifties)? > Lots going on there for kids less than 16social media existed.
years old long before
Some died..
I grew up in a small town in Tasmania (population about 15,000 at the
time) but there was quite a lot going on there too
Quite possible just those social media and a view of different life styles will
protect the very young kids.
It doesn't seem to.
Maybe help them to learn languages, what the world looks like higher than down under...
Other cultures, religions, what not, even electronics...
Grow up. I managed to learn French and German in Tasmania - Australia
had lot of migrants from Europe at that time (including some from the >Netherlands that I ran into as a kid). It obviously wasn't as
cosmopolitan as Amsterdam, but we had a Danish next door neighbor and a >couple of Russians lived just down the street at one stage. They moved
to Sydney and my younger brother ran into them again fifty year later
when he was organising the Sydney Olympic games.
Amsterdam was fun yesterday, media all over it, pro-Palestinians against Jewish genocide-committing foot-ballers.
The football supporters may have included some Jewish military on leave,
but they'd probably argue that the numerous Palestinian civilian
casualties were collateral damage arising from the nasty habit Hamas has
of hiding in the middle of the civilian population. Genocide involves
trying to kill every member of an ethnic group. An insensitivity to >collateral damage is morally repugnant, but it isn't genocide.
Will Trump be shot?
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 19:35:41 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/6/2024 6:14 PM, john larkin wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:11:28 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/6/2024 2:21 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:09:02 -0600, Crash Gordon <uucp@crashelex.com> >>>>> wrote:The polls were pretty much bang on; that _someone_ would likely sweep
On 11/5/2024 11:06 AM, Crash Gordon wrote:
I pledge to accept the election results as certified by the states. I >>>>>>> challenge all other candidates to make the same pledge.
It turns out this pledge was unnecessary. I did *not* see that coming! >>>>>> I was sure it would be at least a week before we had definitive results, >>>>>> that they would be very close, and that there would be multiple challenges.
I am as agog as most democrats at this point.
It was never close. That was just another MSM lie so it would be
easier to fix the result again. But Trump was *so* far ahead that any >>>>> fix would have been easily exposed as such. It was just too risky to >>>>> even contemplate.
the swing states was known for weeks, months. The scenarios where swing >>>> states got split were statistically unlikely.
Running a candidate like Kamala who had not even a primary mandate and >>>> three months to do a not particularly inspiring campaign up against a
billionaire celebrity like Trump was a big gamble, anyone with a brain >>>> knew that. Did the Democrats? Who can say..
What would really be interesting is a Cabinet with one guy who was a
poor hillbilly orphan, and another guy who is the richest person on
Earth.
Vance is an odd duck; seems to believe his mother stealing pills from
her workplace to feed her drug addiction was the fault of somebody other >>than herself and Purdue Pharma.
Having Trump, Vance, RFK Jr. and Musk is a hazard, the gravitational
pull of many massive egos in once place is likely to cause a rip in the >>space time continuum.
I hope DT will make a victory lap of the USA and adbicate to Vance.
Dream on. Biden had some sense (far too late) to bow out but there's no
way Trump is turning over the keys to Vance, or anyone else, easy.
We'll never know what Nancy said to get Joe to quit. Probably
threatened to put his entire family in prison.
On 11/7/2024 10:19 AM, Ralph Mowery wrote:
In article <672cd48a$1$2385539$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
user@example.net says...
Trump's main message is not "small government" it's a chicken in every
pot and trading freedom for security. This used to be the Dem's main
selling point...
It seems the parties are reversing the ideas.
Appropriating some left-wing populist ideas and making them meaner has
been a right-wing thing for a while.
But though Trump tries to be everything to everyone, at least he has a
brand, a coherent message of a sort.
Lately the Dems have just been a rather generic centrist party whose
message such as it is, is that we'll be business-as-usual, keep the cash
and money flowing overseas, keep a bunch of Trumps policies, but at
least not be him. It's insufficient.
Anyway, maybe there should have been a primary.....
In article <sa0oij1ka6s1pfpghsar1hse7c2s7d7s54@4ax.com>, jl@glen--
canyon.com says...
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that
we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
Of all the major crime going on in the city they go after one pet
squirrel. Seems about right for the mentaliy of this country. The
squirrel was easy to find. Trapped in just a few rooms. Maybe they
should give the man harboring the squirrel a few years in prison for
doing something so serious of a crime.Don't worry about the thousands of >illeagal people in the city.
I hope DT will make a victory lap of the USA and adbicate to Vance.
Dream on. Biden had some sense (far too late) to bow out but there's no
way Trump is turning over the keys to Vance, or anyone else, easy.
We'll never know what Nancy said to get Joe to quit. Probably
threatened to put his entire family in prison.
It was insane to have old Joe in the WH given the state he was in.
Seems the US only woke up to his deterioration in that first live TV
debate with Trump. But it was no secret to the rest of us that he'd
been in a bad way for at least 2 years before that. The MSM covered
for him very well. Can you imagine them doing that for Trump? This is
why fewer and fewer people pay any attention to the legacy media
nowadays and get their news from other sources. Zerohedge has run some amazing exposes that were vehemently denied and mocked by the MSM -
but they were subsequently proven 100% correct. They've saved my lilly
white arse more than once, in fact.
On 11/8/2024 12:03 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
You can't tell me that Hopeless Harris was the best the Dems had to
offer.
Early in the campaign (long before there was any discussion of Biden not being the nominee), I would ask Biden supporters if, hypothetically,
Biden didn't run, was there anybody the Dems could nominate that they wouldn't vote for? With one exception, every single Biden supporter
said no, they'd vote for whoever the democratic nominee happened to be.
The single exception was one smartass who said that if the Dems
nominated Trump, he wouldn't vote for him. That guy gets points for
snark, at least.
When it developed that Biden was in fact *not* running, I asked the same question about Harris and got the same answer.
I really don't think it mattered at all who the Democratic nominee was;
the vote would have turned out pretty much the same.
Love him or hate him, you have to give marketing props to Trump. He successfully made the entire election about ->him<- and nothing else.
You can't tell me that Hopeless Harris was the best the Dems had to
offer.
On 11/8/2024 12:03 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
You can't tell me that Hopeless Harris was the best the Dems had to
offer.
Early in the campaign (long before there was any discussion of Biden not >being the nominee), I would ask Biden supporters if, hypothetically,
Biden didn't run, was there anybody the Dems could nominate that they >wouldn't vote for? With one exception, every single Biden supporter
said no, they'd vote for whoever the democratic nominee happened to be.
The single exception was one smartass who said that if the Dems
nominated Trump, he wouldn't vote for him. That guy gets points for
snark, at least.
When it developed that Biden was in fact *not* running, I asked the same >question about Harris and got the same answer.
I really don't think it mattered at all who the Democratic nominee was;
the vote would have turned out pretty much the same.
Love him or hate him, you have to give marketing props to Trump. He >successfully made the entire election about ->him<- and nothing else.
On 11/8/2024 3:49 PM, Crash Gordon wrote:
On 11/8/2024 12:03 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
You can't tell me that Hopeless Harris was the best the Dems had to
offer.
Early in the campaign (long before there was any discussion of Biden not
being the nominee), I would ask Biden supporters if, hypothetically,
Biden didn't run, was there anybody the Dems could nominate that they
wouldn't vote for? With one exception, every single Biden supporter
said no, they'd vote for whoever the democratic nominee happened to be.
The single exception was one smartass who said that if the Dems
nominated Trump, he wouldn't vote for him. That guy gets points for
snark, at least.
When it developed that Biden was in fact *not* running, I asked the same
question about Harris and got the same answer.
I really don't think it mattered at all who the Democratic nominee was;
the vote would have turned out pretty much the same.
Love him or hate him, you have to give marketing props to Trump. He
successfully made the entire election about ->him<- and nothing else.
World's most famous man and his sidekick the world's richest man
successfully voted in as world's most powerful men. Film at 11.
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
I hope DT will make a victory lap of the USA and adbicate to Vance.
Dream on. Biden had some sense (far too late) to bow out but there's no >>>> way Trump is turning over the keys to Vance, or anyone else, easy.
We'll never know what Nancy said to get Joe to quit. Probably
threatened to put his entire family in prison.
It was insane to have old Joe in the WH given the state he was in.
Seems the US only woke up to his deterioration in that first live TV
debate with Trump. But it was no secret to the rest of us that he'd
been in a bad way for at least 2 years before that. The MSM covered
for him very well. Can you imagine them doing that for Trump? This is
why fewer and fewer people pay any attention to the legacy media
nowadays and get their news from other sources. Zerohedge has run some
amazing exposes that were vehemently denied and mocked by the MSM -
but they were subsequently proven 100% correct. They've saved my lilly
white arse more than once, in fact.
Definitely not, we'll get to watch every gory detail of the succession
crisis (and it's already happening.) The vultures are already circling.
I've got my popcorn stocked up..
On Wed, 06 Nov 2024 16:45:28 -0800, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 19:35:41 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/6/2024 6:14 PM, john larkin wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 17:11:28 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/6/2024 2:21 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:09:02 -0600, Crash Gordon <uucp@crashelex.com> >>>>>> wrote:The polls were pretty much bang on; that _someone_ would likely sweep >>>>> the swing states was known for weeks, months. The scenarios where swing >>>>> states got split were statistically unlikely.
On 11/5/2024 11:06 AM, Crash Gordon wrote:
I pledge to accept the election results as certified by the states. I
challenge all other candidates to make the same pledge.
It turns out this pledge was unnecessary. I did *not* see that coming! >>>>>>> I was sure it would be at least a week before we had definitive results,
that they would be very close, and that there would be multiple challenges.
I am as agog as most democrats at this point.
It was never close. That was just another MSM lie so it would be
easier to fix the result again. But Trump was *so* far ahead that any >>>>>> fix would have been easily exposed as such. It was just too risky to >>>>>> even contemplate.
Running a candidate like Kamala who had not even a primary mandate and >>>>> three months to do a not particularly inspiring campaign up against a >>>>> billionaire celebrity like Trump was a big gamble, anyone with a brain >>>>> knew that. Did the Democrats? Who can say..
What would really be interesting is a Cabinet with one guy who was a
poor hillbilly orphan, and another guy who is the richest person on
Earth.
Vance is an odd duck; seems to believe his mother stealing pills from
her workplace to feed her drug addiction was the fault of somebody other >>> than herself and Purdue Pharma.
Having Trump, Vance, RFK Jr. and Musk is a hazard, the gravitational
pull of many massive egos in once place is likely to cause a rip in the
space time continuum.
I hope DT will make a victory lap of the USA and adbicate to Vance.
Dream on. Biden had some sense (far too late) to bow out but there's no
way Trump is turning over the keys to Vance, or anyone else, easy.
We'll never know what Nancy said to get Joe to quit. Probably
threatened to put his entire family in prison.
It was insane to have old Joe in the WH given the state he was in.
Seems the US only woke up to his deterioration in that first live TV
debate with Trump. But it was no secret to the rest of us that he'd
been in a bad way for at least 2 years before that.
The MSM covered for him very well.
Can you imagine them doing that for Trump?
This is why fewer and fewer people pay any attention to the legacy
media nowadays and get their news from other sources.
Zerohedge has run some
amazing exposes that were vehemently denied and mocked by the MSM -
but they were subsequently proven 100% correct. They've saved my lilly
white arse more than once, in fact.
On Thu, 07 Nov 2024 06:41:58 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
[...]
Will Trump be shot?
I'd say he remains in grave peril. I don't trust the CIA goons. He
should surround himself with the 'wall of meat' the Bikers for Trump
offered him, augmented by a few Oathkeepers for good measure. It was
the CIA that whacked JFK - as I assume everyone knows now.
On 9/11/2024 4:50 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 07 Nov 2024 06:41:58 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
[...]
Will Trump be shot?
I'd say he remains in grave peril. I don't trust the CIA goons. He
should surround himself with the 'wall of meat' the Bikers for Trump
offered him, augmented by a few Oathkeepers for good measure. It was
the CIA that whacked JFK - as I assume everyone knows now.
Only the conspiracy theory nuts like Cursitor Doom who like their
demented conspiracy theories to be totally implausible.
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
I hope DT will make a victory lap of the USA and adbicate to Vance. >>>>>Dream on. Biden had some sense (far too late) to bow out but there's no >>>>> way Trump is turning over the keys to Vance, or anyone else, easy.
We'll never know what Nancy said to get Joe to quit. Probably
threatened to put his entire family in prison.
It was insane to have old Joe in the WH given the state he was in.
Seems the US only woke up to his deterioration in that first live TV
debate with Trump. But it was no secret to the rest of us that he'd
been in a bad way for at least 2 years before that. The MSM covered
for him very well. Can you imagine them doing that for Trump? This is
why fewer and fewer people pay any attention to the legacy media
nowadays and get their news from other sources. Zerohedge has run some
amazing exposes that were vehemently denied and mocked by the MSM -
but they were subsequently proven 100% correct. They've saved my lilly
white arse more than once, in fact.
Definitely not, we'll get to watch every gory detail of the succession
crisis (and it's already happening.) The vultures are already circling.
I've got my popcorn stocked up..
I think you may be in luck. They'll find a way to thwart Trump and the
will of the people yet.
These bastards are utterly ruthless and will
stop at literally nothing to get their way.
But they're no friends of yours, either. Whatever utopia you may be dreaming of if Trump's out of the picture, you won't find it delivered by THEM.
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 17:05:30 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/7/2024 10:19 AM, Ralph Mowery wrote:
In article <672cd48a$1$2385539$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
user@example.net says...
Trump's main message is not "small government" it's a chicken in every >>>> pot and trading freedom for security. This used to be the Dem's main
selling point...
It seems the parties are reversing the ideas.
Appropriating some left-wing populist ideas and making them meaner has
been a right-wing thing for a while.
But though Trump tries to be everything to everyone, at least he has a
brand, a coherent message of a sort.
Lately the Dems have just been a rather generic centrist party whose
message such as it is, is that we'll be business-as-usual, keep the cash
and money flowing overseas, keep a bunch of Trumps policies, but at
least not be him. It's insufficient.
Anyway, maybe there should have been a primary.....
You can't tell me that Hopeless Harris was the best the Dems had to
offer.
They threw away their chance with this pick. Having the
prospect of the 'first black woman ever to be US president' might
sound grand to you or your cohort, but it's utterly meaningless to
folks who care more about their pocket-book than the colour or gender
of a candidate. As someone once said, "It's the economy, stupid."
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:56:24 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/8/2024 3:49 PM, Crash Gordon wrote:
On 11/8/2024 12:03 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
You can't tell me that Hopeless Harris was the best the Dems had to
offer.
Early in the campaign (long before there was any discussion of Biden not >>> being the nominee), I would ask Biden supporters if, hypothetically,
Biden didn't run, was there anybody the Dems could nominate that they
wouldn't vote for? With one exception, every single Biden supporter
said no, they'd vote for whoever the democratic nominee happened to be.
The single exception was one smartass who said that if the Dems
nominated Trump, he wouldn't vote for him. That guy gets points for
snark, at least.
When it developed that Biden was in fact *not* running, I asked the same >>> question about Harris and got the same answer.
I really don't think it mattered at all who the Democratic nominee was;
the vote would have turned out pretty much the same.
Love him or hate him, you have to give marketing props to Trump. He
successfully made the entire election about ->him<- and nothing else.
World's most famous man and his sidekick the world's richest man
successfully voted in as world's most powerful men. Film at 11.
Look on the plus side. They're rich enough not be hired for rent like
the typical politician is. You can't buy guys like them.
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:56:24 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 11/8/2024 3:49 PM, Crash Gordon wrote:
On 11/8/2024 12:03 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
You can't tell me that Hopeless Harris was the best the Dems had to
offer.
Early in the campaign (long before there was any discussion of Biden not >>> being the nominee), I would ask Biden supporters if, hypothetically,
Biden didn't run, was there anybody the Dems could nominate that they
wouldn't vote for? With one exception, every single Biden supporter
said no, they'd vote for whoever the democratic nominee happened to be.
The single exception was one smartass who said that if the Dems
nominated Trump, he wouldn't vote for him. That guy gets points for
snark, at least.
When it developed that Biden was in fact *not* running, I asked the same >>> question about Harris and got the same answer.
I really don't think it mattered at all who the Democratic nominee was;
the vote would have turned out pretty much the same.
Love him or hate him, you have to give marketing props to Trump. He
successfully made the entire election about ->him<- and nothing else.
World's most famous man and his sidekick the world's richest man
successfully voted in as world's most powerful men. Film at 11.
Look on the plus side. They're rich enough not be hired for rent like
the typical politician is. You can't buy guys like them.
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 14:49:26 -0600, Crash Gordon <uucp@crashelex.com>
wrote:
On 11/8/2024 12:03 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
You can't tell me that Hopeless Harris was the best the Dems had to
offer.
Early in the campaign (long before there was any discussion of Biden not
being the nominee), I would ask Biden supporters if, hypothetically,
Biden didn't run, was there anybody the Dems could nominate that they
wouldn't vote for? With one exception, every single Biden supporter
said no, they'd vote for whoever the democratic nominee happened to be.
The single exception was one smartass who said that if the Dems
nominated Trump, he wouldn't vote for him. That guy gets points for
snark, at least.
When it developed that Biden was in fact *not* running, I asked the same
question about Harris and got the same answer.
I really don't think it mattered at all who the Democratic nominee was;
the vote would have turned out pretty much the same.
Love him or hate him, you have to give marketing props to Trump. He
successfully made the entire election about ->him<- and nothing else.
You're talking about Democrats, though. I'm talking about the kind of candidate who could have won over the floating/undecided voters in the
swing states.
On a sunny day (Sat, 9 Nov 2024 01:17:14 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vgl6hm$37jl9$1@dont-email.me>:
On 8/11/2024 11:50 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 8 Nov 2024 23:05:27 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vgkuqi$36je2$1@dont-email.me>:
On 8/11/2024 5:19 pm, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 8 Nov 2024 12:44:37 +1100) it happened Bill Sloman >>>>> <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in <vgjqeg$2t0r1$2@dont-email.me>:
European parliamentary systems were pretty rudimentary back in 1786. >>>>>> They've got a lot better since then. The Australian constitution got set >>>>>> up in 1901 and missed the cutting edge stuff that the Swedes and the >>>>>> Dutch worked out a few later. The 1948 German constitution copied them >>>>>> and seems to work well.
Australia now wants to ban kids below 16 years of age from participating in / using social media!
Ridiculous!!!
Less ridiculous to the parents of kids who have taken bad advice that
they got from social media.
Would not they have died <and maybe sooner> if left to the control of their parents of environment only?
Probably not. There seem to have been more bad outcomes in the last few
years than there were before social media became popular
As soon as kids can read and write they can also swipe a smart phone these days...
They know about google and politics too.
But they mostly can't afford smart phones.
Kids don't have good judgement - neither do
you - but most of them get wiser as the get older and brain development settles down >> settles down. They can't even get
married without parental consent.
boring twit!
You seem to be the twit here. I'm not to boring to reply to.
Kangaroos have more freedom there.
And most Australian kids can spell the word correctly. Kangaroos are
wild animals,
Just testing
Pull the other leg.
and can't screw up as thoroughly as kids can. They rarely
commit suicide or become anorexic.
You just contradicted your own argument.
But you can't spell out how.
You never grew up in a city (like me in Amsterdam in the forties and fifties)? > Lots going on there for kids less than 16social media existed.
years old long before
Some died..
I grew up in a small town in Tasmania (population about 15,000 at the
time) but there was quite a lot going on there too
Quite possible just those social media and a view of different life styles will
protect the very young kids.
It doesn't seem to.
Maybe help them to learn languages, what the world looks like higher than down under...
Other cultures, religions, what not, even electronics...
Grow up. I managed to learn French and German in Tasmania - Australia
had lot of migrants from Europe at that time (including some from the
Netherlands that I ran into as a kid). It obviously wasn't as
cosmopolitan as Amsterdam, but we had a Danish next door neighbor and a
couple of Russians lived just down the street at one stage. They moved
to Sydney and my younger brother ran into them again fifty year later
when he was organising the Sydney Olympic games.
Amsterdam was fun yesterday, media all over it, pro-Palestinians against Jewish genocide-committing foot-ballers.
The football supporters may have included some Jewish military on leave,
but they'd probably argue that the numerous Palestinian civilian
casualties were collateral damage arising from the nasty habit Hamas has
of hiding in the middle of the civilian population. Genocide involves
trying to kill every member of an ethnic group. An insensitivity to
collateral damage is morally repugnant, but it isn't genocide.
Jews are just an other fanatic religious group who believe in Moses and what not
The Faraos already kicked them out, had enough of them.
October 7 was provoked by them putting settlements and killing Palestinians.
They just grab and steal what they can, they want the Palestinian landstrip for their own
killing hundreds if not thousands of Palestinian kids, destroying all houses.
Good news source of what is happening there is Al Jazeera (banned in is-a-hell now).
They kill journalists, doctors, healthcare workers, aid workers too, just are animals.
US supporting them is all about weapons sales, paid for by the US taxpayer many who are now homeless because of those taxes
and lack of real useful jobs, or shot by the weapons made by that club, even kids at schools.
Netanyhu is a CIA agent and that guy who started October 7 was also one.
That is how the USA plays the game, I know how CIA plays.
All for the money.
And who pays? The US taxpayer does.
Hopefully Trump will end that corrupt weapon selling club.
Else may the rest of the world nuke it into oblivion as far as I am concerned.
Love him or hate him, you have to give marketing props to Trump. He
successfully made the entire election about ->him<- and nothing else.
You're talking about Democrats, though. I'm talking about the kind of
candidate who could have won over the floating/undecided voters in the
swing states.
Most of whom weren't well educated, and were susceptible to Trump's lies.
A Democrat candidate who could have out-lied him is conceivable, but no
name springs to mind. Trump has been lying on a industrial scale for
most of his career and has a string of bankruptcies to show for it.
The take-away message is that America needs to clean up it's secondary education system, but it is unique in that it's primary and secondary education system is run and paid for by tiny school districts.
The US constitution was written before universal education was
economically feasible - it took Turnip Townsend's agricultural
revolution to make it possible - and education isn't a responsibility of
the nation or the individual states.
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 10:18:09 -0500, Ralph Mowery
<rmowery42@charter.net> wrote:
In article <sa0oij1ka6s1pfpghsar1hse7c2s7d7s54@4ax.com>, jl@glen--
canyon.com says...
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that
we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
Of all the major crime going on in the city they go after one pet
squirrel. Seems about right for the mentaliy of this country. The
squirrel was easy to find. Trapped in just a few rooms. Maybe they
should give the man harboring the squirrel a few years in prison for
doing something so serious of a crime.Don't worry about the thousands of
illeagal people in the city.
Ignorant people like Bill Sloman think that squirrels are just rats
with a bushy tail, but they are *way* more intelligent and social.
They're easy to tame and enjoy human company. And they care about each
other more than a lot of humans do.This short clip is very touching
and shows this not untypical behaviour:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 22:48:41 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 19:26:30 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 17:49:46 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 07:34:47 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:18:53 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> >>>>>wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:51:27 +1100, Bill Sloman >>>>>><bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 10/11/2024 3:16 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:59:54 +1100, Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
<snip>
Trump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement >>>>>>>>>>> funded by the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred >>>>>>>>>>> candidates was able to out-perform Donald Trump in the
primaries for the 2016 presidential election. If you were >>>>>>>>>>> spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers, you were too >>>>>>>>>>> spineless to appeal to the electorate.
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition >>>>>>>>>> movement? What a guy!
There was no master mind involved. Trump ran for the Republican >>>>>>>>> nomination as an ego trip, and was vastly surprised when he won >>>>>>>>> it.
I don't know how you come by the idea that Trump is an egoist. >>>>>>>> He's always presented as extremely modest and unassuming IMO.
John Larkin is of roughly the same opinion - and he's another >>>>>>>narcissist.
Well thank heavens that's one character trait you don't suffer from, >>>>>>Bill. ;->
PLEASE stop feeding Sloman. He is a major contributor to driving >>>>>people away.
Sigh... Yes, I will. However, you *really* should lead by example here >>>>and stop feeding him yourself. I've noticed you provide him with a >>>>pretty rich diet. So I'll do a deal with you (not that the last one >>>>concerning a burger and fries got me very far, but still) if you cease >>>>to respond to Bill's barbs, I'll do likewise. Agreed? In the interests >>>>of group harmony, please consider making the sacrifice along with me.
Feeding him?
I had been trying, roughly once a year, to engage him on not-personal >>>issues, like electronics even, but it doesn't help. He keeps getting >>>nastier.
Haven't you noticed that he insults everyone? Badly.
His limited vocabulary kind of lets him down on that front. Perhaps in
the old days it was more expansive, I can't recall.
Anyway, let's agree to just not respond to him. Both of us. Let's just
not feed him any more. Deal?
Yes.
C Doom wrote:
babble
Plonk.
That saves time and cuts bullshit
Lurking the same.
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 14:00:23 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:
On 11/11/2024 2:34 am, john larkin wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:18:53 +0000, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:51:27 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 3:16 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:Well thank heavens that's one character trait you don't suffer from,
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 02:59:54 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>> wrote:
On 10/11/2024 12:32 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:38:04 +1100, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 9/11/2024 11:38 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:00:04 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
On 11/8/2024 12:58 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
<snip>
I don't know how you come by the idea that Trump is an egoist. He's >>>>>> always presented as extremely modest and unassuming IMO.Trump was an unintended consequence of the Tea Party movement funded by
the Koch brothers from 2010, none of whose preferred candidates was able
to out-perform Donald Trump in the primaries for the 2016 presidential
election. If you were spineless enough to appeal to the Koch brothers,
you were too spineless to appeal to the electorate.
So Trump masterminded a reverse takeover of a fake opposition >>>>>>>> movement? What a guy!
There was no master mind involved. Trump ran for the Republican
nomination as an ego trip, and was vastly surprised when he won it. >>>>>>
John Larkin is of roughly the same opinion - and he's another narcissist. >>>>
Bill. ;->
PLEASE stop feeding Sloman. He is a major contributor to driving
people away.
In the sense that I don't give John Larkin the flattery he feels he >>deserves, which leaves him feeling insulted, so he figures that
everybody else feels equally hurt.
Can you not see that you're projecting (as the pyschiatrists call it)
here, Bill? You are assuming that JL needs flattery to feel validated
On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 12:58:26 GMT, Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid>
wrote:
C Doom wrote:
babble
Plonk.
That saves time and cuts bullshit
Lurking the same.
Hey, CD, should we ignore JP too? He has invited me to.
May as well. We can read the silly science web sites ourselves.
On 12/11/2024 10:08 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 20:38:14 -0800, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 04:10:52 -0000 (UTC), Jasen Betts
<usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:
On 2024-11-07, Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> wrote:
In article <sa0oij1ka6s1pfpghsar1hse7c2s7d7s54@4ax.com>, jl@glen--
canyon.com says...
There are lots of people here, and in other countries, who think that >>>>>> we have too much government. Killing the squirrel was an example.
Of all the major crime going on in the city they go after one pet
squirrel.
It wasn't about "crime" it was about an animal bite.
There are no non-fatal tests for rabies in humans or animals
Squirrels almost never get rabies.
And yet those demonic Democrats murdered him anyway.
You can't murder a squirrel. You can kill it, but murder is specific to >humans.
What a bunch of jerks.
Making it less likely that people will get rabies isn't the action of a
jerk.
This is precisely the kind of petty town hall interference that
Trump needs to break up and destroy.
And Trump is dim enough to see it that way. He's not actually all that >stupid, but he seems to be incapable of the kind of attention span that
would let him place the action in context. Curistor Doom is equally >ill-informed, and somewhat dimmer.
They both seem to be thoroughly ill-informed on climate change. Cursitor
Doom went on quixotic quest to find old and misleading data to bolster
his ill-founded opinions. Trump wouldn't have bothered.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 418 |
Nodes: | 16 (1 / 15) |
Uptime: | 02:42:32 |
Calls: | 8,786 |
Calls today: | 13 |
Files: | 13,296 |
Messages: | 5,965,493 |