Cursitor Doom wrote:
28% of "Democrats" are fine about murdering a political opponent if it
furthers their "progressive" cause. Just think about *that* for a
second.
And another second for that other poll that says 65% of people with
master's degrees would cheat in an election.
Democrats love to brag that most people with master's degrees are
Democrats, so they must be smarter.
28% of "Democrats" are fine about murdering a political opponent if it furthers their "progressive" cause. Just think about *that* for a
second.
Tom Del Rosso <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:
Cursitor Doom wrote:
28% of "Democrats" are fine about murdering a political opponent if it
furthers their "progressive" cause. Just think about *that* for a
second.
And another second for that other poll that says 65% of people with
master's degrees would cheat in an election.
Democrats love to brag that most people with master's degrees are
Democrats, so they must be smarter.
Nah, in my world that means they flunked their Ph.D. quals. ;)
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 22:51:28 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
Tom Del Rosso <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:
Cursitor Doom wrote:
28% of "Democrats" are fine about murdering a political opponent if it >>>> furthers their "progressive" cause. Just think about *that* for a
second.
Luckily, 99.8% of Democrats are too wussy to ever murder anyone, even
if they want to. *Real* marxists have no limits in that regard.
And another second for that other poll that says 65% of people with
master's degrees would cheat in an election.
Democrats love to brag that most people with master's degrees are
Democrats, so they must be smarter.
Nah, in my world that means they flunked their Ph.D. quals. ;)
We just fired a PhD. Great theorist, no common sense.
We just fired a PhD. Great theorist, no common sense.
Didn't have enough sense to flatter John Larkin as fulsomely as he
should have done. Or maybe a bad case intellectual integrity.
On 9/23/2024 10:51 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:
We just fired a PhD. Great theorist, no common sense.
Didn't have enough sense to flatter John Larkin as fulsomely as he
should have done. Or maybe a bad case intellectual integrity.
If someone want a "great theorist" who can also sling solder and knows
their way around a bench that seems like something to be resolved at the >interview stage, not however many months or years later.
But yeah everyone I know myself included has been turned down for
positions where despite being very familiar with the potential
employer's actual problem they prefer to discuss some other random thing
not significantly related to the job description as written, up to and >including sports or what my relationship with my mother is like
(seriously.)
I optimistically chalk it up to "cultural differences" but I do prefer >employers do that sorting at the interview stage.
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 22:51:28 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
Tom Del Rosso <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:
Cursitor Doom wrote:
28% of "Democrats" are fine about murdering a political opponent if it >>>> furthers their "progressive" cause. Just think about *that* for a
second.
Luckily, 99.8% of Democrats are too wussy to ever murder anyone, even
if they want to. *Real* marxists have no limits in that regard.
And another second for that other poll that says 65% of people with
master's degrees would cheat in an election.
Democrats love to brag that most people with master's degrees are
Democrats, so they must be smarter.
Nah, in my world that means they flunked their Ph.D. quals. ;)
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
We just fired a PhD. Great theorist, no common sense.
On 9/23/2024 7:34 PM, john larkin wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 22:51:28 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
Tom Del Rosso <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:
Cursitor Doom wrote:
28% of "Democrats" are fine about murdering a political opponent if it >>>>> furthers their "progressive" cause. Just think about *that* for a
second.
Luckily, 99.8% of Democrats are too wussy to ever murder anyone, even
if they want to. *Real* marxists have no limits in that regard.
Republicans do seem to keep taking pops at Trump they should try to
knock that off.
The "real Marxists" I'm familiar with tend to like coffee shops and
Sartre more than the gun range but there are some (nut cases) who
believe every cat lady with a "Coexist" sticker on her Yaris is just
waiting to pop out guns blazing and initiate the Cultural Revolution at
a moment's notice.
And another second for that other poll that says 65% of people with
master's degrees would cheat in an election.
Democrats love to brag that most people with master's degrees are
Democrats, so they must be smarter.
Nah, in my world that means they flunked their Ph.D. quals. ;)
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
We just fired a PhD. Great theorist, no common sense.
Unclear to me why the US university system is considered some hotbed of >Marxsim when it tends to be one of the most stodgy top-down
organizations there are, with procedures and websites that tend to date
to the technological Neolithic.
I'm familiar with a young person with a disability who's in a STEM
program at a relatively prestigious university and it's apparently
difficult to get many STEM profs to even just fahkin' face forwards and
not mumble most of the time, for the benefit of video lectures/ >transcriptions for the hard-of-hearing, much less embrace a
dictatorshiop of the proletariat.
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:57:09 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 9/23/2024 10:51 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:
We just fired a PhD. Great theorist, no common sense.
Didn't have enough sense to flatter John Larkin as fulsomely as he
should have done. Or maybe a bad case intellectual integrity.
If someone want a "great theorist" who can also sling solder and knows
their way around a bench that seems like something to be resolved at the
interview stage, not however many months or years later.
But yeah everyone I know myself included has been turned down for
positions where despite being very familiar with the potential
employer's actual problem they prefer to discuss some other random thing
not significantly related to the job description as written, up to and
including sports or what my relationship with my mother is like
(seriously.)
I optimistically chalk it up to "cultural differences" but I do prefer
employers do that sorting at the interview stage.
It's a fact that you don't really know a person until you work with
them.
Designing things is a mix of technology and personality. It's hard to interview for both.
In my last case, the person wanted to do fancy complex slow expensive
stuff to solve simple problems.
On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:38:57 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 9/23/2024 7:34 PM, john larkin wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 22:51:28 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
Tom Del Rosso <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:
Cursitor Doom wrote:
28% of "Democrats" are fine about murdering a political opponent if it >>>>>> furthers their "progressive" cause. Just think about *that* for a
second.
Luckily, 99.8% of Democrats are too wussy to ever murder anyone, even
if they want to. *Real* marxists have no limits in that regard.
Republicans do seem to keep taking pops at Trump they should try to
knock that off.
The "real Marxists" I'm familiar with tend to like coffee shops and
Sartre more than the gun range but there are some (nut cases) who
believe every cat lady with a "Coexist" sticker on her Yaris is just
waiting to pop out guns blazing and initiate the Cultural Revolution at
a moment's notice.
And another second for that other poll that says 65% of people with
master's degrees would cheat in an election.
Democrats love to brag that most people with master's degrees are
Democrats, so they must be smarter.
Nah, in my world that means they flunked their Ph.D. quals. ;)
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
We just fired a PhD. Great theorist, no common sense.
Unclear to me why the US university system is considered some hotbed of
Marxsim when it tends to be one of the most stodgy top-down
organizations there are, with procedures and websites that tend to date
to the technological Neolithic.
I'm familiar with a young person with a disability who's in a STEM
program at a relatively prestigious university and it's apparently
difficult to get many STEM profs to even just fahkin' face forwards and
not mumble most of the time, for the benefit of video lectures/
transcriptions for the hard-of-hearing, much less embrace a
dictatorshiop of the proletariat.
The real gulag megadeath and starvation Marxists were Lenin, Stalin,
Mao, and Castro, not the college-campus party tent crowd.
Sri Lanka just elected a Marxist president.
Cubans are scrounging in the garbage for food.
Nobody can manage an economy, especially a Marxist.
Karl Marx was a nasty lunatic. Google that phrase.
The real gulag megadeath and starvation Marxists were Lenin, Stalin,
Mao, and Castro, not the college-campus party tent crowd.
Am 24.09.24 um 21:21 schrieb john larkin:
The real gulag megadeath and starvation Marxists were Lenin, Stalin,
Mao, and Castro, not the college-campus party tent crowd.
No, they were Leninists, Stalinists, Maoists.
Castro was an island monkey without much influence in comparison.
And it's kinda funny how the Left moved Hitler's
"National-Socialist Worker's Party" to the right, carefully
avoiding the Socialist part by inventing the word "Nazi",
which is actually a diminuitive.
Am 24.09.24 um 21:21 schrieb john larkin:
The real gulag megadeath and starvation Marxists were Lenin, Stalin,
Mao, and Castro, not the college-campus party tent crowd.
No, they were Leninists, Stalinists, Maoists.
Castro was an island monkey without much influence in comparison.
And it's kinda funny how the Left moved Hitler's
"National-Socialist Worker's Party" to the right, carefully
avoiding the Socialist part by inventing the word "Nazi",
which is actually a diminuitiv.
On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 12:02:05 +0200, Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de>
wrote:
Am 24.09.24 um 21:21 schrieb john larkin:
The real gulag megadeath and starvation Marxists were Lenin, Stalin,
Mao, and Castro, not the college-campus party tent crowd.
No, they were Leninists, Stalinists, Maoists.
Once the Marxist Party takes control, you have a selfish and
eventually murderous elite owning and controlling everything.
Castro was an island monkey without much influence in comparison.
He sure damaged Cuba.
And it's kinda funny how the Left moved Hitler's
"National-Socialist Worker's Party" to the right, carefully
avoiding the Socialist part by inventing the word "Nazi",
which is actually a diminuitiv.
All government is dynamically unstable. Power enhances power.
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 22:51:28 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs ><pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
Tom Del Rosso <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:
Cursitor Doom wrote:
28% of "Democrats" are fine about murdering a political opponent if it >>>> furthers their "progressive" cause. Just think about *that* for a
second.
Luckily, 99.8% of Democrats are too wussy to ever murder anyone, even
if they want to. *Real* marxists have no limits in that regard.
And another second for that other poll that says 65% of people with
master's degrees would cheat in an election.
Democrats love to brag that most people with master's degrees are
Democrats, so they must be smarter.
Nah, in my world that means they flunked their Ph.D. quals. ;)
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
We just fired a PhD. Great theorist, no common sense.
On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 12:02:05 +0200, Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de>
wrote:
Am 24.09.24 um 21:21 schrieb john larkin:
The real gulag megadeath and starvation Marxists were Lenin, Stalin,
Mao, and Castro, not the college-campus party tent crowd.
No, they were Leninists, Stalinists, Maoists.
Once the Marxist Party takes control, you have a selfish and
eventually murderous elite owning and controlling everything.
Am 24.09.24 um 21:21 schrieb john larkin:
The real gulag megadeath and starvation Marxists were Lenin, Stalin,
Mao, and Castro, not the college-campus party tent crowd.
No, they were Leninists, Stalinists, Maoists.
Castro was an island monkey without much influence in comparison.
And it's kinda funny how the Left moved Hitler's
"National-Socialist Worker's Party" to the right, carefully
avoiding the Socialist part by inventing the word "Nazi",
which is actually a diminuitiv.
On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 12:02:05 +0200, Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de>
wrote:
Am 24.09.24 um 21:21 schrieb john larkin:
The real gulag megadeath and starvation Marxists were Lenin, Stalin,
Mao, and Castro, not the college-campus party tent crowd.
No, they were Leninists, Stalinists, Maoists.
Correct, and that's an important distinction. Solzhenitsyn was at
pains to point out that it wasn't just Stalin who made that dreadful
Soviet system possible. It was the Party and everyone else who went
along with it - and said nothing.
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 16:34:30 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 22:51:28 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
Tom Del Rosso <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:
Cursitor Doom wrote:
28% of "Democrats" are fine about murdering a political opponent if it >>>>> furthers their "progressive" cause. Just think about *that* for a
second.
Luckily, 99.8% of Democrats are too wussy to ever murder anyone, even
if they want to. *Real* marxists have no limits in that regard.
And another second for that other poll that says 65% of people with
master's degrees would cheat in an election.
Democrats love to brag that most people with master's degrees are
Democrats, so they must be smarter.
Nah, in my world that means they flunked their Ph.D. quals. ;)
We just fired a PhD. Great theorist, no common sense.
Academic brilliance and common sense seldom go hand in hand.
On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 09:14:59 -0700, john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 12:02:05 +0200, Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de>
wrote:
Am 24.09.24 um 21:21 schrieb john larkin:
The real gulag megadeath and starvation Marxists were Lenin, Stalin,
Mao, and Castro, not the college-campus party tent crowd.
No, they were Leninists, Stalinists, Maoists.
Once the Marxist Party takes control, you have a selfish and
eventually murderous elite owning and controlling everything.
There wasn't even much "eventually" about it, either. By the early
1920s, Lenin was already instigating the first wave of murderous persecutions.
Marxists just can't wait to get their hands around other
folks' throats. Let's not kid ourselves this madness couldn't arise
again today, either.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 418 |
Nodes: | 16 (1 / 15) |
Uptime: | 03:28:00 |
Calls: | 8,787 |
Calls today: | 14 |
Files: | 13,296 |
Messages: | 5,965,648 |