• PI3USB14-A dual 4>1 USB switch for analog

    From Phil Hobbs@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 25 12:28:42 2024
    Hi, all,

    I'm in a bit of a rush, doing revs to a testing board for a prototype
    lidar ASIC that turns out to be..., um..., well.... Let's just say it's
    a _tiny_bit_delicate_ electrically. Yeah, just a little delicate,
    that's it. (Not our design or our nickel, fortunately.)

    It runs on a single supply, so the only sequencing issues are with the
    signal pins. Thus the test board is going to bring up V_DD smoothly and
    not too slowly: a monotonic edge of about 100 us. While that's going
    on, all the inputs and outputs will see 100k ohms to ground. (All the
    enables are positive-true, which makes this easier.)

    The digital pins are all inputs, so they're just buffered with
    SN74LVC1G125s (tri-state Schmitt noninverting), with the aforementioned
    100k to ground on their outputs.

    The analog outputs don't have much drive, but can go pretty fast if you
    keep the capacitance down. There are a fair few of them, so I want to
    mux them down before the op amp buffers (OPA2626es--surprisingly nice
    chips).

    Because we're not made of money, and the test boards aren't ITAR, we're
    getting them made and stuffed at JLCPCB. Thus we care a lot about what
    their tame distributor LCSC has in stock.

    They're fairly light on analog muxes, it turns out. Going through what
    they do have, I was reminded just how awful the capacitance of old-timey
    mux parts is--way over 100 pF at the common pin of an 8-1, blech.

    They do have these very nice-looking USB switches, type PI3USB14-A, for
    pretty cheap ($0.45 @ 1ea) and in plentiful stock.

    They look beautiful--6 ohms R_on, 4 pF C_off typical--but apart from one crosstalk number, the datasheet gives only sketchy hints about their
    actual analog performance--bandwidth and crosstalk, but nothing about
    charge injection, switching times, make-before-break, resistance
    linearity, or distortion.

    Has any of you used them for actual analog stuff?

    Thanks

    Phil Hobbs

    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs
    Principal Consultant
    ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
    Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
    Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

    http://electrooptical.net
    http://hobbs-eo.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical. on Thu Apr 25 14:36:57 2024
    On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 12:28:42 -0400, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    Hi, all,

    I'm in a bit of a rush, doing revs to a testing board for a prototype
    lidar ASIC that turns out to be..., um..., well.... Let's just say it's
    a _tiny_bit_delicate_ electrically. Yeah, just a little delicate,
    that's it. (Not our design or our nickel, fortunately.)

    It runs on a single supply, so the only sequencing issues are with the
    signal pins. Thus the test board is going to bring up V_DD smoothly and
    not too slowly: a monotonic edge of about 100 us. While that's going
    on, all the inputs and outputs will see 100k ohms to ground. (All the
    enables are positive-true, which makes this easier.)

    The digital pins are all inputs, so they're just buffered with
    SN74LVC1G125s (tri-state Schmitt noninverting), with the aforementioned
    100k to ground on their outputs.

    The analog outputs don't have much drive, but can go pretty fast if you
    keep the capacitance down. There are a fair few of them, so I want to
    mux them down before the op amp buffers (OPA2626es--surprisingly nice
    chips).

    Because we're not made of money, and the test boards aren't ITAR, we're >getting them made and stuffed at JLCPCB. Thus we care a lot about what
    their tame distributor LCSC has in stock.

    They're fairly light on analog muxes, it turns out. Going through what
    they do have, I was reminded just how awful the capacitance of old-timey
    mux parts is--way over 100 pF at the common pin of an 8-1, blech.

    They do have these very nice-looking USB switches, type PI3USB14-A, for >pretty cheap ($0.45 @ 1ea) and in plentiful stock.

    They look beautiful--6 ohms R_on, 4 pF C_off typical--but apart from one >crosstalk number, the datasheet gives only sketchy hints about their
    actual analog performance--bandwidth and crosstalk, but nothing about
    charge injection, switching times, make-before-break, resistance
    linearity, or distortion.

    Has any of you used them for actual analog stuff?

    Thanks

    Phil Hobbs

    We use TS3USB30EDGSR to switch/mux fast signals. We mostly use them as setup-time switches, things like polarity switching and low/50r source impedances, things like that, so we haven't explored dynamics much.
    They do propagate fast signals nicely.

    How about using relays?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Jones@21:1/5 to Phil Hobbs on Sat Apr 27 01:01:54 2024
    On 26/04/2024 2:28 am, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    Hi, all,

    I'm in a bit of a rush, doing revs to a testing board for a prototype
    lidar ASIC that turns out to be..., um..., well....  Let's just say it's
    a _tiny_bit_delicate_ electrically.  Yeah, just a little delicate,
    that's it. (Not our design or our nickel, fortunately.)

    It runs on a single supply, so the only sequencing issues are with the
    signal pins. Thus the test board is going to bring up V_DD smoothly and
    not too slowly: a monotonic edge of about 100 us.  While that's going
    on, all the inputs and outputs will see 100k ohms to ground. (All the
    enables are positive-true, which makes this easier.)

    The digital pins are all inputs, so they're just buffered with
    SN74LVC1G125s (tri-state Schmitt noninverting), with the aforementioned
    100k to ground on their outputs.

    The analog outputs don't have much drive, but can go pretty fast if you
    keep the capacitance down.  There are a fair few of them, so I want to
    mux them down before the op amp buffers (OPA2626es--surprisingly nice
    chips).

    Because we're not made of money, and the test boards aren't ITAR, we're getting them made and stuffed at JLCPCB.  Thus we care a lot about what their tame distributor LCSC has in stock.

    They're fairly light on analog muxes, it turns out.  Going through what
    they do have, I was reminded just how awful the capacitance of old-timey
    mux parts is--way over 100 pF at the common pin of an 8-1, blech.

    They do have these very nice-looking USB switches, type PI3USB14-A, for pretty cheap ($0.45 @ 1ea) and in plentiful stock.

    They look beautiful--6 ohms R_on, 4 pF C_off typical--but apart from one crosstalk number, the datasheet gives only sketchy hints about their
    actual analog performance--bandwidth and crosstalk, but nothing about
    charge injection, switching times, make-before-break, resistance
    linearity, or distortion.

    Has any of you used them for actual analog stuff?

    Thanks

    Phil Hobbs


    As long as you don't need the signals to swing near the positive rail, I suggest you google "H-mode mixer" as a lot of amateur radio enthusiasts
    have built mixers using bus switches, basically just nmos fets with a
    gate driver. For example: https://martein.home.xs4all.nl/pa3ake/hmode/switches.html

    They may not be better than the PI3USB14-A but I have a better guess of
    what is in them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Jones@21:1/5 to Chris Jones on Sat Apr 27 01:12:13 2024
    On 27/04/2024 1:01 am, Chris Jones wrote:
    On 26/04/2024 2:28 am, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    Hi, all,

    I'm in a bit of a rush, doing revs to a testing board for a prototype
    lidar ASIC that turns out to be..., um..., well....  Let's just say
    it's a _tiny_bit_delicate_ electrically.  Yeah, just a little
    delicate, that's it. (Not our design or our nickel, fortunately.)

    It runs on a single supply, so the only sequencing issues are with the
    signal pins. Thus the test board is going to bring up V_DD smoothly
    and not too slowly: a monotonic edge of about 100 us.  While that's
    going on, all the inputs and outputs will see 100k ohms to ground.
    (All the enables are positive-true, which makes this easier.)

    The digital pins are all inputs, so they're just buffered with
    SN74LVC1G125s (tri-state Schmitt noninverting), with the
    aforementioned 100k to ground on their outputs.

    The analog outputs don't have much drive, but can go pretty fast if
    you keep the capacitance down.  There are a fair few of them, so I
    want to mux them down before the op amp buffers
    (OPA2626es--surprisingly nice chips).

    Because we're not made of money, and the test boards aren't ITAR,
    we're getting them made and stuffed at JLCPCB.  Thus we care a lot
    about what their tame distributor LCSC has in stock.

    They're fairly light on analog muxes, it turns out.  Going through
    what they do have, I was reminded just how awful the capacitance of
    old-timey mux parts is--way over 100 pF at the common pin of an 8-1,
    blech.

    They do have these very nice-looking USB switches, type PI3USB14-A,
    for pretty cheap ($0.45 @ 1ea) and in plentiful stock.

    They look beautiful--6 ohms R_on, 4 pF C_off typical--but apart from
    one crosstalk number, the datasheet gives only sketchy hints about
    their actual analog performance--bandwidth and crosstalk, but nothing
    about charge injection, switching times, make-before-break, resistance
    linearity, or distortion.

    Has any of you used them for actual analog stuff?

    Thanks

    Phil Hobbs


    As long as you don't need the signals to swing near the positive rail, I suggest you google "H-mode mixer" as a lot of amateur radio enthusiasts
    have built mixers using bus switches, basically just nmos fets with a
    gate driver. For example: https://martein.home.xs4all.nl/pa3ake/hmode/switches.html

    They may not be better than the PI3USB14-A but I have a better guess of
    what is in them.

    Ah, I see they also tried ones with both NMOS and PMOS devices in the
    switches. The FSA3157 seems to have somewhat more complete
    specifications than the one you mentioned.

    If you don't happen to need it to swing near the positive rail, you
    might get less capacitance with a NMOS-only type like the venerable FST3125.

    I hope the ones that also have PMOS devices in the switches keep the
    backgates of the PMOS at the rail (like a 4016), and don't do the
    horrible backgate switching trickery to reduce Ron like in the old 4066.
    I think some of those might have been so bad that they could momentarily
    short your signal to the rail, and even if not, they certainly had
    another big charge injection mechanism.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to lugnut808@spam.yahoo.com on Fri Apr 26 11:03:08 2024
    On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 01:12:13 +1000, Chris Jones
    <lugnut808@spam.yahoo.com> wrote:

    On 27/04/2024 1:01 am, Chris Jones wrote:
    On 26/04/2024 2:28 am, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    Hi, all,

    I'm in a bit of a rush, doing revs to a testing board for a prototype
    lidar ASIC that turns out to be..., um..., well....  Let's just say
    it's a _tiny_bit_delicate_ electrically.  Yeah, just a little
    delicate, that's it. (Not our design or our nickel, fortunately.)

    It runs on a single supply, so the only sequencing issues are with the
    signal pins. Thus the test board is going to bring up V_DD smoothly
    and not too slowly: a monotonic edge of about 100 us.  While that's
    going on, all the inputs and outputs will see 100k ohms to ground.
    (All the enables are positive-true, which makes this easier.)

    The digital pins are all inputs, so they're just buffered with
    SN74LVC1G125s (tri-state Schmitt noninverting), with the
    aforementioned 100k to ground on their outputs.

    The analog outputs don't have much drive, but can go pretty fast if
    you keep the capacitance down.  There are a fair few of them, so I
    want to mux them down before the op amp buffers
    (OPA2626es--surprisingly nice chips).

    Because we're not made of money, and the test boards aren't ITAR,
    we're getting them made and stuffed at JLCPCB.  Thus we care a lot
    about what their tame distributor LCSC has in stock.

    They're fairly light on analog muxes, it turns out.  Going through
    what they do have, I was reminded just how awful the capacitance of
    old-timey mux parts is--way over 100 pF at the common pin of an 8-1,
    blech.

    They do have these very nice-looking USB switches, type PI3USB14-A,
    for pretty cheap ($0.45 @ 1ea) and in plentiful stock.

    They look beautiful--6 ohms R_on, 4 pF C_off typical--but apart from
    one crosstalk number, the datasheet gives only sketchy hints about
    their actual analog performance--bandwidth and crosstalk, but nothing
    about charge injection, switching times, make-before-break, resistance
    linearity, or distortion.

    Has any of you used them for actual analog stuff?

    Thanks

    Phil Hobbs


    As long as you don't need the signals to swing near the positive rail, I
    suggest you google "H-mode mixer" as a lot of amateur radio enthusiasts
    have built mixers using bus switches, basically just nmos fets with a
    gate driver. For example:
    https://martein.home.xs4all.nl/pa3ake/hmode/switches.html

    They may not be better than the PI3USB14-A but I have a better guess of
    what is in them.

    Ah, I see they also tried ones with both NMOS and PMOS devices in the >switches. The FSA3157 seems to have somewhat more complete
    specifications than the one you mentioned.



    The 3157 is nice too, SPDT in a small package, with specified charge
    injection. We pay 7 cents.



    If you don't happen to need it to swing near the positive rail, you
    might get less capacitance with a NMOS-only type like the venerable FST3125.

    Optimistically, complementary P and N fets would have cancelling
    charge injection. But that doesn't always work (another sad story.)



    I hope the ones that also have PMOS devices in the switches keep the >backgates of the PMOS at the rail (like a 4016), and don't do the
    horrible backgate switching trickery to reduce Ron like in the old 4066.
    I think some of those might have been so bad that they could momentarily >short your signal to the rail, and even if not, they certainly had
    another big charge injection mechanism.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Hobbs@21:1/5 to Chris Jones on Fri Apr 26 19:47:37 2024
    On 2024-04-26 11:12, Chris Jones wrote:
    On 27/04/2024 1:01 am, Chris Jones wrote:
    On 26/04/2024 2:28 am, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    Hi, all,

    I'm in a bit of a rush, doing revs to a testing board for a prototype
    lidar ASIC that turns out to be..., um..., well....  Let's just say
    it's a _tiny_bit_delicate_ electrically.  Yeah, just a little
    delicate, that's it. (Not our design or our nickel, fortunately.)

    It runs on a single supply, so the only sequencing issues are with
    the signal pins. Thus the test board is going to bring up V_DD
    smoothly and not too slowly: a monotonic edge of about 100 us.  While
    that's going on, all the inputs and outputs will see 100k ohms to
    ground. (All the enables are positive-true, which makes this easier.)

    The digital pins are all inputs, so they're just buffered with
    SN74LVC1G125s (tri-state Schmitt noninverting), with the
    aforementioned 100k to ground on their outputs.

    The analog outputs don't have much drive, but can go pretty fast if
    you keep the capacitance down.  There are a fair few of them, so I
    want to mux them down before the op amp buffers
    (OPA2626es--surprisingly nice chips).

    Because we're not made of money, and the test boards aren't ITAR,
    we're getting them made and stuffed at JLCPCB.  Thus we care a lot
    about what their tame distributor LCSC has in stock.

    They're fairly light on analog muxes, it turns out.  Going through
    what they do have, I was reminded just how awful the capacitance of
    old-timey mux parts is--way over 100 pF at the common pin of an 8-1,
    blech.

    They do have these very nice-looking USB switches, type PI3USB14-A,
    for pretty cheap ($0.45 @ 1ea) and in plentiful stock.

    They look beautiful--6 ohms R_on, 4 pF C_off typical--but apart from
    one crosstalk number, the datasheet gives only sketchy hints about
    their actual analog performance--bandwidth and crosstalk, but nothing
    about charge injection, switching times, make-before-break,
    resistance linearity, or distortion.

    Has any of you used them for actual analog stuff?

    Thanks

    Phil Hobbs


    As long as you don't need the signals to swing near the positive rail,
    I suggest you google "H-mode mixer" as a lot of amateur radio
    enthusiasts have built mixers using bus switches, basically just nmos
    fets with a gate driver. For example:
    https://martein.home.xs4all.nl/pa3ake/hmode/switches.html

    They may not be better than the PI3USB14-A but I have a better guess
    of what is in them.

    Thanks. The CMOS mux mixer was AFAICT first popularized by Ed Oxner of Siliconix back in the early '80s. They make nice strong mixers, for sure.


    Ah, I see they also tried ones with both NMOS and PMOS devices in the switches. The FSA3157 seems to have somewhat more complete
    specifications than the one you mentioned.

    Wouldn't be hard. ;)

    If you don't happen to need it to swing near the positive rail, you
    might get less capacitance with a NMOS-only type like the venerable
    FST3125.

    Obsolete, unfortunately.


    I hope the ones that also have PMOS devices in the switches keep the backgates of the PMOS at the rail (like a 4016), and don't do the
    horrible backgate switching trickery to reduce Ron like in the old 4066.
    I think some of those might have been so bad that they could momentarily short your signal to the rail, and even if not, they certainly had
    another big charge injection mechanism.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs


    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs
    Principal Consultant
    ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
    Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
    Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

    http://electrooptical.net
    http://hobbs-eo.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Hobbs@21:1/5 to John Larkin on Fri Apr 26 19:30:58 2024
    On 2024-04-26 14:03, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 01:12:13 +1000, Chris Jones
    <lugnut808@spam.yahoo.com> wrote:

    On 27/04/2024 1:01 am, Chris Jones wrote:
    On 26/04/2024 2:28 am, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    Hi, all,

    I'm in a bit of a rush, doing revs to a testing board for a prototype
    lidar ASIC that turns out to be..., um..., well....  Let's just say
    it's a _tiny_bit_delicate_ electrically.  Yeah, just a little
    delicate, that's it. (Not our design or our nickel, fortunately.)

    It runs on a single supply, so the only sequencing issues are with the >>>> signal pins. Thus the test board is going to bring up V_DD smoothly
    and not too slowly: a monotonic edge of about 100 us.  While that's
    going on, all the inputs and outputs will see 100k ohms to ground.
    (All the enables are positive-true, which makes this easier.)

    The digital pins are all inputs, so they're just buffered with
    SN74LVC1G125s (tri-state Schmitt noninverting), with the
    aforementioned 100k to ground on their outputs.

    The analog outputs don't have much drive, but can go pretty fast if
    you keep the capacitance down.  There are a fair few of them, so I
    want to mux them down before the op amp buffers
    (OPA2626es--surprisingly nice chips).

    Because we're not made of money, and the test boards aren't ITAR,
    we're getting them made and stuffed at JLCPCB.  Thus we care a lot
    about what their tame distributor LCSC has in stock.

    They're fairly light on analog muxes, it turns out.  Going through
    what they do have, I was reminded just how awful the capacitance of
    old-timey mux parts is--way over 100 pF at the common pin of an 8-1,
    blech.

    They do have these very nice-looking USB switches, type PI3USB14-A,
    for pretty cheap ($0.45 @ 1ea) and in plentiful stock.

    They look beautiful--6 ohms R_on, 4 pF C_off typical--but apart from
    one crosstalk number, the datasheet gives only sketchy hints about
    their actual analog performance--bandwidth and crosstalk, but nothing
    about charge injection, switching times, make-before-break, resistance >>>> linearity, or distortion.

    Has any of you used them for actual analog stuff?

    Thanks

    Phil Hobbs


    As long as you don't need the signals to swing near the positive rail, I >>> suggest you google "H-mode mixer" as a lot of amateur radio enthusiasts
    have built mixers using bus switches, basically just nmos fets with a
    gate driver. For example:
    https://martein.home.xs4all.nl/pa3ake/hmode/switches.html

    They may not be better than the PI3USB14-A but I have a better guess of
    what is in them.

    Ah, I see they also tried ones with both NMOS and PMOS devices in the
    switches. The FSA3157 seems to have somewhat more complete
    specifications than the one you mentioned.



    The 3157 is nice too, SPDT in a small package, with specified charge injection. We pay 7 cents.

    The onsemi FSA3157 is obsolete, unfortunately. There are TI and Diodes
    Inc versions that you can still get,

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs
    Principal Consultant
    ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
    Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
    Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

    http://electrooptical.net
    http://hobbs-eo.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical. on Fri Apr 26 17:07:10 2024
    On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:30:58 -0400, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    On 2024-04-26 14:03, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 01:12:13 +1000, Chris Jones
    <lugnut808@spam.yahoo.com> wrote:

    On 27/04/2024 1:01 am, Chris Jones wrote:
    On 26/04/2024 2:28 am, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    Hi, all,

    I'm in a bit of a rush, doing revs to a testing board for a prototype >>>>> lidar ASIC that turns out to be..., um..., well....  Let's just say
    it's a _tiny_bit_delicate_ electrically.  Yeah, just a little
    delicate, that's it. (Not our design or our nickel, fortunately.)

    It runs on a single supply, so the only sequencing issues are with the >>>>> signal pins. Thus the test board is going to bring up V_DD smoothly
    and not too slowly: a monotonic edge of about 100 us.  While that's
    going on, all the inputs and outputs will see 100k ohms to ground.
    (All the enables are positive-true, which makes this easier.)

    The digital pins are all inputs, so they're just buffered with
    SN74LVC1G125s (tri-state Schmitt noninverting), with the
    aforementioned 100k to ground on their outputs.

    The analog outputs don't have much drive, but can go pretty fast if
    you keep the capacitance down.  There are a fair few of them, so I
    want to mux them down before the op amp buffers
    (OPA2626es--surprisingly nice chips).

    Because we're not made of money, and the test boards aren't ITAR,
    we're getting them made and stuffed at JLCPCB.  Thus we care a lot
    about what their tame distributor LCSC has in stock.

    They're fairly light on analog muxes, it turns out.  Going through
    what they do have, I was reminded just how awful the capacitance of
    old-timey mux parts is--way over 100 pF at the common pin of an 8-1, >>>>> blech.

    They do have these very nice-looking USB switches, type PI3USB14-A,
    for pretty cheap ($0.45 @ 1ea) and in plentiful stock.

    They look beautiful--6 ohms R_on, 4 pF C_off typical--but apart from >>>>> one crosstalk number, the datasheet gives only sketchy hints about
    their actual analog performance--bandwidth and crosstalk, but nothing >>>>> about charge injection, switching times, make-before-break, resistance >>>>> linearity, or distortion.

    Has any of you used them for actual analog stuff?

    Thanks

    Phil Hobbs


    As long as you don't need the signals to swing near the positive rail, I >>>> suggest you google "H-mode mixer" as a lot of amateur radio enthusiasts >>>> have built mixers using bus switches, basically just nmos fets with a
    gate driver. For example:
    https://martein.home.xs4all.nl/pa3ake/hmode/switches.html

    They may not be better than the PI3USB14-A but I have a better guess of >>>> what is in them.

    Ah, I see they also tried ones with both NMOS and PMOS devices in the
    switches. The FSA3157 seems to have somewhat more complete
    specifications than the one you mentioned.



    The 3157 is nice too, SPDT in a small package, with specified charge
    injection. We pay 7 cents.

    The onsemi FSA3157 is obsolete, unfortunately. There are TI and Diodes
    Inc versions that you can still get,

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    My MAX record shows OnSemi NLASB3157DFT2G as an acceptable sub. They
    hires sadists to make up part numbers.

    I like HH Smith, with part numbers like 101.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Hobbs@21:1/5 to John Larkin on Sat Apr 27 19:46:13 2024
    On 2024-04-26 20:07, John Larkin wrote:
    On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:30:58 -0400, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    On 2024-04-26 14:03, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 01:12:13 +1000, Chris Jones
    <lugnut808@spam.yahoo.com> wrote:

    On 27/04/2024 1:01 am, Chris Jones wrote:
    On 26/04/2024 2:28 am, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    Hi, all,

    I'm in a bit of a rush, doing revs to a testing board for a prototype >>>>>> lidar ASIC that turns out to be..., um..., well....  Let's just say >>>>>> it's a _tiny_bit_delicate_ electrically.  Yeah, just a little
    delicate, that's it. (Not our design or our nickel, fortunately.)

    It runs on a single supply, so the only sequencing issues are with the >>>>>> signal pins. Thus the test board is going to bring up V_DD smoothly >>>>>> and not too slowly: a monotonic edge of about 100 us.  While that's >>>>>> going on, all the inputs and outputs will see 100k ohms to ground. >>>>>> (All the enables are positive-true, which makes this easier.)

    The digital pins are all inputs, so they're just buffered with
    SN74LVC1G125s (tri-state Schmitt noninverting), with the
    aforementioned 100k to ground on their outputs.

    The analog outputs don't have much drive, but can go pretty fast if >>>>>> you keep the capacitance down.  There are a fair few of them, so I >>>>>> want to mux them down before the op amp buffers
    (OPA2626es--surprisingly nice chips).

    Because we're not made of money, and the test boards aren't ITAR,
    we're getting them made and stuffed at JLCPCB.  Thus we care a lot >>>>>> about what their tame distributor LCSC has in stock.

    They're fairly light on analog muxes, it turns out.  Going through >>>>>> what they do have, I was reminded just how awful the capacitance of >>>>>> old-timey mux parts is--way over 100 pF at the common pin of an 8-1, >>>>>> blech.

    They do have these very nice-looking USB switches, type PI3USB14-A, >>>>>> for pretty cheap ($0.45 @ 1ea) and in plentiful stock.

    They look beautiful--6 ohms R_on, 4 pF C_off typical--but apart from >>>>>> one crosstalk number, the datasheet gives only sketchy hints about >>>>>> their actual analog performance--bandwidth and crosstalk, but nothing >>>>>> about charge injection, switching times, make-before-break, resistance >>>>>> linearity, or distortion.

    Has any of you used them for actual analog stuff?

    Thanks

    Phil Hobbs


    As long as you don't need the signals to swing near the positive rail, I >>>>> suggest you google "H-mode mixer" as a lot of amateur radio enthusiasts >>>>> have built mixers using bus switches, basically just nmos fets with a >>>>> gate driver. For example:
    https://martein.home.xs4all.nl/pa3ake/hmode/switches.html

    They may not be better than the PI3USB14-A but I have a better guess of >>>>> what is in them.

    Ah, I see they also tried ones with both NMOS and PMOS devices in the
    switches. The FSA3157 seems to have somewhat more complete
    specifications than the one you mentioned.



    The 3157 is nice too, SPDT in a small package, with specified charge
    injection. We pay 7 cents.

    The onsemi FSA3157 is obsolete, unfortunately. There are TI and Diodes
    Inc versions that you can still get,

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    My MAX record shows OnSemi NLASB3157DFT2G as an acceptable sub. They
    hires sadists to make up part numbers.

    I like HH Smith, with part numbers like 101.

    Since everybody gave up on having the part numbers fit on the package,
    the sky's the limit.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs
    Principal Consultant
    ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
    Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
    Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

    http://electrooptical.net
    http://hobbs-eo.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)