• OT : Relativity Q

    From Clive Arthur@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 25 23:30:49 2024
    I'm in a spaceship travelling at 0.866c away from Earth. AIUI, that's a
    time dilation of 2, and my speedometer, which of course uses my on-board
    clock and a set of mile markers laid down by a previous expedition,
    indicates 2c.

    Earth is beaming a laser in my direction and pulsing it once per Earth
    second. Clearly these pulses are going faster than me, and I have a
    handy pulse detector.

    What frequency of pulse repetition will I measure with my on-board instrumentation?

    And, Captain Slog-supplemental, what if the laser is instead at my
    destination planet?

    --
    Cheers
    Clive

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Sloman@21:1/5 to Clive Arthur on Mon Feb 26 15:10:59 2024
    On 26/02/2024 10:30 am, Clive Arthur wrote:
    I'm in a spaceship travelling at 0.866c away from Earth.  AIUI, that's a time dilation of 2, and my speedometer, which of course uses my on-board clock and a set of mile markers laid down by a previous expedition,
    indicates 2c.

    Earth is beaming a laser in my direction and pulsing it once per Earth second.  Clearly these pulses are going faster than me, and I have a
    handy pulse detector.

    What frequency of pulse repetition will I measure with my on-board instrumentation?

    And, Captain Slog-supplemental, what if the laser is instead at my destination planet?

    Ignoring relativity, you'd see a new pulses originating from earth at
    the rate of one per second once every 7.5 seconds (Doppler effect) .
    Because of time dilation you'd think that there only 3.73 second between
    each new pulse.

    You'd run into 7.5 pulses a second for a 1Hz pulse originating on your destination planet, and time dilation would made you think that it was
    pulsing at 14.9Hz.

    So the Doppler effect is more dramatic than time dialation.

    But why bother to ask the question? Darius the Dumb thinks that it is an off-topic question - why he should feel the need to point this out when
    you have marked it as off-topic in your subject line is a question worth asking, but Darius the Dumb is remarkably dumb.

    Asking an off-topic question isn't actually proof positive that you are
    a troll. Most people who post here post off-topic question that they
    correctly imagine will still be of interest to the people who habitually
    post here, but that's a more complicated idea than Darius can get his
    head around.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Clive Arthur@21:1/5 to Bill Sloman on Mon Feb 26 11:59:33 2024
    On 26/02/2024 04:10, Bill Sloman wrote:
    On 26/02/2024 10:30 am, Clive Arthur wrote:
    I'm in a spaceship travelling at 0.866c away from Earth.  AIUI, that's
    a time dilation of 2, and my speedometer, which of course uses my
    on-board clock and a set of mile markers laid down by a previous
    expedition, indicates 2c.

    Earth is beaming a laser in my direction and pulsing it once per Earth
    second.  Clearly these pulses are going faster than me, and I have a
    handy pulse detector.

    What frequency of pulse repetition will I measure with my on-board
    instrumentation?

    And, Captain Slog-supplemental, what if the laser is instead at my
    destination planet?

    Ignoring relativity, you'd see a new  pulses originating from earth at
    the rate of one per second once every 7.5 seconds (Doppler effect) .
    Because of time dilation you'd think that there only 3.73 second between
    each new pulse.

    You'd run into 7.5 pulses a second for a 1Hz pulse originating on your destination planet, and time dilation would made you think that it was pulsing at 14.9Hz.

    So the Doppler effect is more dramatic than time dialation.

    Thanks Bill, very helpful. That's what I'd worked out, but for some
    reason I'd convinced myself I was wrong.

    But why bother to ask the question? Darius the Dumb thinks that it is an off-topic question - why he should feel the need to point this out when
    you have marked it as off-topic in your subject line is a question worth asking, but Darius the Dumb is remarkably dumb.

    Asking an off-topic question isn't actually proof positive that you are
    a troll. Most people who post here post off-topic question that they correctly imagine will still be of interest to the people who habitually
    post here, but that's a more complicated idea than Darius can get his
    head around.

    I don't see his posts. I very rarely killfile, but life's too short to
    bother with sad attention-seekers.

    --
    Cheers
    Clive

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Sloman@21:1/5 to Clive Arthur on Tue Feb 27 00:26:42 2024
    On 26/02/2024 10:59 pm, Clive Arthur wrote:
    On 26/02/2024 04:10, Bill Sloman wrote:
    On 26/02/2024 10:30 am, Clive Arthur wrote:

    <snip>

    Thanks Bill, very helpful.  That's what I'd worked out, but for some
    reason I'd convinced myself I was wrong.

    I'm no authority. There are a couple of people who post here who might
    give you a more reliable opinion.

    <snipped a reference to Darius the Dumb>

    I don't see his posts.  I very rarely killfile, but life's too short to bother with sad attention-seekers.

    He does waste a lot of bandwidth. He's even more inane than Skybuck
    Flying, and he posts a whole lot more.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)