Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
<https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/>
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?I already had one
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth, the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from conspiracy -
most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their salaries,
most career scientists and technologosts are right wing, because they
know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their salaries - what
position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid leftard green vegan
sister remark 'on which websites you read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can be well misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making money,
and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not right wing.
It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the people who used to be
in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from within
by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the Guardian
for all that. They are however lying to you about climate change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and in general anything they take a political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we will
fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what reason
would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth, the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from conspiracy -
most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their salaries,
most career scientists and technologosts are right wing, because they
know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their salaries - what
position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid leftard green vegan
sister remark 'on which websites you read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can be well misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making money,
and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not right wing.
It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the people who used to be
in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from within
by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the Guardian
for all that. They are however lying to you about climate change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and in general anything they take a political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we will
fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what reason
would they have to exist any more?
On 28/12/2023 11:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
Google Conservative Woman and this description of the site pops up:
'We advocate for conservatism, the only rational response to modern day >problems; we challenge leftism wherever it lurks and threatens our liberty.'
I think most people would see that as a statement that the site supports >right wing views.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth, the
qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from conspiracy -
most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their salaries,
most career scientists and technologosts are right wing, because they
know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their salaries - what
position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid leftard green vegan
sister remark 'on which websites you read' (she listens to the BBC and
reads the Guardian so she can be well misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making money,
and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not right wing.
It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the people who used to be
in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from within
by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain with
Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the Guardian
for all that. They are however lying to you about climate change,
immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and in general
anything they take a political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we will
fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what reason
would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
No, just a fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth, the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from conspiracy
- most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right wing,
because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their
salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid
leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you read' (she
listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can be well
misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not
right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the people
who used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain
with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the
Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about climate
change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and in
general anything they take a political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we
will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what
reason would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 13:03:49 +0000, Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 11:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
Google Conservative Woman and this description of the site pops up:
'We advocate for conservatism, the only rational response to modern day
problems; we challenge leftism wherever it lurks and threatens our liberty.' >>
I think most people would see that as a statement that the site supports
right wing views.
What does that matter? There are people on the Left who are equally
concerned about the vaccines. I recall Dave Plowman being equally
dismissive and contemptuous before the clot-shot killed him a short
time later.
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 13:03:49 +0000, Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 11:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
Google Conservative Woman and this description of the site pops up:
'We advocate for conservatism, the only rational response to modern day
problems; we challenge leftism wherever it lurks and threatens our liberty.' >>
I think most people would see that as a statement that the site supports
right wing views.
What does that matter? There are people on the Left who are equally
concerned about the vaccines. ...
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth, the
qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from conspiracy
- most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right wing,
because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their
salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid
leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you read' (she
listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can be well
misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not
right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the people
who used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain
with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the
Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about climate
change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and in
general anything they take a political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we
will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what
reason would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
There are people on the Left who are equally
concerned about the vaccines. I recall Dave Plowman being equally
dismissive and contemptuous before the clot-shot killed him a short
time later.
On 28/12/2023 11:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth, the
qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from conspiracy
- most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right wing,
because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their
salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid
leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you read' (she
listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can be well
misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not right
wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the people who
used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain
with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the
Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about climate
change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and in
general anything they take a political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we will
fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what reason
would they have to exist any more?
If they demonstrated competence in solving the problem, then they'd have demonstrated that they would likely be competent to solve other problems
and therefore be eminently re-electable. The trouble is none of the
parties shows any competence and even where they do start to work on a problem, the end point is so far down the line that the next government cancels the work on it or takes the credit for the result.
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 01:10:27 +1100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 13:03:49 +0000, Colin Bignell
<cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 11:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
Google Conservative Woman and this description of the site pops up:
'We advocate for conservatism, the only rational response to modern day
problems; we challenge leftism wherever it lurks and threatens our
liberty.'
I think most people would see that as a statement that the site supports >>> right wing views.
What does that matter? There are people on the Left who are equally
concerned about the vaccines. I recall Dave Plowman being equally
dismissive and contemptuous before the clot-shot killed him a short
time later.
It was the prostate cancer that killed him, not the vaccination.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth, the
qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from conspiracy - >>>> most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their salaries, >>>> most career scientists and technologosts are right wing, because they
know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their salaries - what
position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid leftard green vegan >>>> sister remark 'on which websites you read' (she listens to the BBC and >>>> reads the Guardian so she can be well misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
money,
and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not right wing.
It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the people who used to be >>>> in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from within >>>> by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain
with
Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the Guardian >>>> for all that. They are however lying to you about climate change,
immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and in general
anything they take a political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we will >>>> fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what reason
would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
On 28/12/2023 14:10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 13:03:49 +0000, Colin Bignell
<cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 11:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
Google Conservative Woman and this description of the site pops up:
'We advocate for conservatism, the only rational response to modern day
problems; we challenge leftism wherever it lurks and threatens our liberty.'
I think most people would see that as a statement that the site supports >>> right wing views.
What does that matter? There are people on the Left who are equally
concerned about the vaccines. ...
I agree that there are nutters everywhere, but the point being discussed
was political leanings of that particular site.
Wrong as ever, my antipodean friend. Bowel cancer actually - which had
been successfully treated until he had his covid jab. Flared up again
shortly after. Poor bastard.
Er, no. What was being discussed was the emerging link between mRNA
vaccines and cancer
On 28/12/2023 17:13, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Wrong as ever, my antipodean friend. Bowel cancer actually - which had
been successfully treated until he had his covid jab. Flared up again
shortly after. Poor bastard.
I can well understand that people with cancer unfortunately die. The
time of their dying may coincide with other things. Christmas, for
example. Some people with cancer die soon after Christmas, but only an
utter lunatic would claim that Christmas causes cancer to flare up.
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 04:02:44 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 01:10:27 +1100, Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com>
wrote:
What does that matter? There are people on the Left who are equally
concerned about the vaccines. I recall Dave Plowman being equally
dismissive and contemptuous before the clot-shot killed him a short
time later.
It was the prostate cancer that killed him, not the vaccination.
Wrong as ever, my antipodean friend. Bowel cancer actually - which had
been successfully treated until he had his covid jab. Flared up again
shortly after. Poor bastard.
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:02:06 +0000, Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 14:10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 13:03:49 +0000, Colin Bignell
<cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 11:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
Google Conservative Woman and this description of the site pops up:
'We advocate for conservatism, the only rational response to modern day >>>> problems; we challenge leftism wherever it lurks and threatens our liberty.'
I think most people would see that as a statement that the site supports >>>> right wing views.
What does that matter? There are people on the Left who are equally
concerned about the vaccines. ...
I agree that there are nutters everywhere, but the point being discussed
was political leanings of that particular site.
Er, no. What was being discussed was the emerging link between mRNA
vaccines and cancer (see the subject line!) It was you and "Steve" who
as usual were attempting your usual Marxist tactic of diverting the
thread into something completely different.
On Thursday, December 28, 2023 at 10:05:03?PM UTC+11, The Natural Philosopher wrote:they can get away with.
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <c...@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth, the
qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from conspiracy -
most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their salaries,
most career scientists and technologists are right wing, because they
know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their salaries - what
position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid leftard green vegan
sister remark 'on which websites you read' (she listens to the BBC and
reads the Guardian so she can be well misinformed).
This is typical rightard nonsense. The difference between left wingers and right-winger is that left-wingers think that society can changed to make it work better, and right-wingers think that most change is for the worse, so they prefer as little as
Academics are aware of how much society has changed, mostly for the better, while career scientists and technologists concentrate on the stuff they can change, and don't want to have to pay attention to anything they don't have under their control.it as fuel can keep on making money that way).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making money,
and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement.
Only in the rightard propganda rags.
It's not right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the people who used to be in the Communist party.
Anybody who "used to be be in the Communist Party" is so old now that most of them are dead. I know one survivor, and he's neither anti-science or anti-vax. He's actually a reader at Edinburgh University, and perfectly sensible.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from within
by telling tales about its government.
Rightards do a lot of that. Donald trump is a prime example
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*.
But taken out of context.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain with
Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the Guardian
for all that. They are however lying to you about climate change,
immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and in general
anything they take a political stance on.
Not that I've noticed. Rightards don't seem to understand the scientific basis of climate change, and are qullible suckers for the lyig propaganda that claims that it is happening (and the people making money out of digging up fossil carbon and selling
The same people tell that you that burning fossil carbon delivers cheaper energy that renewable sources, though this stopped being ture more than a decade ago.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we will
fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what reason
would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
UKIP was an attention-getting device use by Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson to get them the column inches they craved.
Nobody should have taken either of those clowns seriously, and the consequences have been pretty horrible. The UK was in a customs union with it's major trading partners and now it isn't. Silly move.
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 13:03:49 +0000, Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 11:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
Google Conservative Woman and this description of the site pops up:
'We advocate for conservatism, the only rational response to modern day
problems; we challenge leftism wherever it lurks and threatens our liberty.' >>
I think most people would see that as a statement that the site supports
right wing views.
What does that matter? There are people on the Left who are equally
concerned about the vaccines. I recall Dave Plowman being equally
dismissive and contemptuous before the clot-shot killed him a short
time later.
The Natural Philosopher wrote:
Cursitor Doom wrote:
I recall Dave Plowman being equally dismissive and contemptuous
before the clot-shot killed him a short time later.
Is plowcunt dead?
No I don't think so; I realised he'd not posted here since the start of
May, and I've never noticed him post in any other groups I use, but when
I mentioned it here, someone else said that they'd spoken to him
elsewhere online (a car or broadcast forum perhaps?)
I had him killfiled so I never noticed. And how did
you know what he died of?
Cursitor Doom wrote:
I recall Dave Plowman being equally dismissive and contemptuous
before the clot-shot killed him a short time later.
Is plowcunt dead?
I had him killfiled so I never noticed. And how did
you know what he died of?
The US left has appropriated (more like re-engaged) with some ideas
about threats to liberty i.e. that police opening fire on citizens on
the regular isn't great for their liberty.
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 13:03:49 +0000, Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 11:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
Google Conservative Woman and this description of the site pops up:
'We advocate for conservatism, the only rational response to modern day
problems; we challenge leftism wherever it lurks and threatens our liberty.' >>
I think most people would see that as a statement that the site supports
right wing views.
What does that matter? There are people on the Left who are equally
concerned about the vaccines. I recall Dave Plowman being equally
dismissive and contemptuous before the clot-shot killed him a short
time later.
On 28/12/2023 14:10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 13:03:49 +0000, Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 11:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
Google Conservative Woman and this description of the site pops up:
'We advocate for conservatism, the only rational response to modern day
problems; we challenge leftism wherever it lurks and threatens our liberty.'
I think most people would see that as a statement that the site supports >> right wing views.
What does that matter? There are people on the Left who are equally concerned about the vaccines. I recall Dave Plowman being equally dismissive and contemptuous before the clot-shot killed him a short
time later.
Did it ?. I wondered what happened to him.
He did actually have prostate cancer, and quite advanced
from what I remember, so I think it is more likely that that
was his real medical problem.
In article <umn1gm$tqm0$1@dont-email.me>,
Andrew <Andrew97d@btinternet.com> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 14:10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 13:03:49 +0000, Colin Bignell
<cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 11:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
Google Conservative Woman and this description of the site pops up:
'We advocate for conservatism, the only rational response to modern day >>>> problems; we challenge leftism wherever it lurks and threatens our liberty.'
I think most people would see that as a statement that the site supports >>>> right wing views.
What does that matter? There are people on the Left who are equally
concerned about the vaccines. I recall Dave Plowman being equally
dismissive and contemptuous before the clot-shot killed him a short
time later.
Did it ?. I wondered what happened to him.
he's still alive. I exchanged emails withnhim in the last 24 hours.
On Friday, December 29, 2023 at 7:06:28?AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:The UK wasn't as submerged as it should have been - it still thought that it had. an empire.
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 06:04:48 -0800 (PST), Anthony William Sloman
<bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
On Thursday, December 28, 2023 at 10:05:03?PM UTC+11, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
Cursitor Doom <c...@notformail.com> wrote:
<snip>
Look at UKIP...
UKIP was an attention-getting device use by Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson to get them the column inches they craved.
Nobody should have taken either of those clowns seriously, and the consequences have been pretty horrible. The UK was in a customs union with it's major trading partners and now it isn't. Silly move.
The UK was in an undemocratic political union submerged with 26 other countries and now it isn't. Good move.
The UK was in a customs union with most of its major trading partners and now it isn't. A disastrous economic error.
The European Union has an ambition to become a democratically run political union, but while it has a democratically elected parliament that sits in Strasbourg, that hasn't got any power at all, and it all works by negotiation between nation states.
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 19:22:30 -0800 (PST), Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:The UK wasn't as submerged as it should have been - it still thought that it had. an empire.
On Friday, December 29, 2023 at 7:06:28?AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 06:04:48 -0800 (PST), Anthony William Sloman
<bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
On Thursday, December 28, 2023 at 10:05:03?PM UTC+11, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
Cursitor Doom <c...@notformail.com> wrote:
<snip>
Look at UKIP...
UKIP was an attention-getting device use by Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson to get them the column inches they craved.
Nobody should have taken either of those clowns seriously, and the consequences have been pretty horrible. The UK was in a customs union with it's major trading partners and now it isn't. Silly move.
The UK was in an undemocratic political union submerged with 26 other countries and now it isn't. Good move.
The UK was in a customs union with most of its major trading partners and now it isn't. A disastrous economic error.
The European Union has an ambition to become a democratically run political union, but while it has a democratically elected parliament that sits in Strasbourg, that hasn't got any power at all, and it all works by negotiation between nation states.
Nonsense, Bill. Economic growth is currently higher in the UK than in
Germany - even with the worst government Britain's had in the last 50
years, the country's still doing better than Germany.
On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth,
the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
conspiracy
- most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right wing,
because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their
salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid
leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can
be well misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not
right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
people who used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain
with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the
Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about climate
change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and
in general anything they take a political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we
will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what
reason would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
I don't answer leading questions.
When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
(shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
On 30/12/2023 6:21 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:The UK wasn't as submerged as it should have been - it still thought that it had. an empire.
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 19:22:30 -0800 (PST), Anthony William Sloman
<bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
On Friday, December 29, 2023 at 7:06:28?AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote: >>>> On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 06:04:48 -0800 (PST), Anthony William Sloman
<bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
On Thursday, December 28, 2023 at 10:05:03?PM UTC+11, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
Cursitor Doom <c...@notformail.com> wrote:
<snip>
Look at UKIP...
UKIP was an attention-getting device use by Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson to get them the column inches they craved.
Nobody should have taken either of those clowns seriously, and the consequences have been pretty horrible. The UK was in a customs union with it's major trading partners and now it isn't. Silly move.
The UK was in an undemocratic political union submerged with 26 other countries and now it isn't. Good move.
The UK was in a customs union with most of its major trading partners and now it isn't. A disastrous economic error.
The European Union has an ambition to become a democratically run political union, but while it has a democratically elected parliament that sits in Strasbourg, that hasn't got any power at all, and it all works by negotiation between nation states.
Nonsense, Bill. Economic growth is currently higher in the UK than in
Germany - even with the worst government Britain's had in the last 50
years, the country's still doing better than Germany.
With the conservative party in charge of the department that publishes
the statistics, you can expect them to be saying that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_European_countries_by_average_wage
The average monthly wage in the UK is 3138 euro.
In Germany it is 4625 euro.
The UK may be catching up - at the moment - but it is a long way behind.
Germany has been investing more per worker for a very long time. Back
when Thatcher was being rude about the productivity of UK workers,
somebody checked out productivity as function of capital investment per >worker,and the UK workers backed up by German levels of capital
investment were more productive than their German counterparts - but
there weren't many of them. UK capitalist didn't like investing money in
making their workers more productive and only did it when there was a
lot of money to be made.
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000I don't answer leading questions.
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth,
the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
conspiracy
- most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right wing,
because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their
salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid
leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can
be well misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not
right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
people who used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain
with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the
Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about climate
change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and
in general anything they take a political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we
will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what
reason would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
(shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
I'll take that as a no.
On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000I don't answer leading questions.
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth,
the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
conspiracy
- most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right
wing, because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay
their salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely
so candid leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites
you read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she
can be well misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not
right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
people who used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact
*true*.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your
brain with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC
and the Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you
about climate change, immigration, economics, renewable energy
and net zero, and in general anything they take a political
stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we
will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*,
what reason would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
(shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
I'll take that as a no.
Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
interested in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and
faux logic.
So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't interested
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000I don't answer leading questions.
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth,
the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
conspiracy
- most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right wing, >>>>>> because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their
salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid >>>>>> leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can
be well misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not
right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
people who used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*. >>>>>>
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain >>>>>> with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the >>>>>> Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about climate >>>>>> change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and >>>>>> in general anything they take a political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we
will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what >>>>>> reason would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
(shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
I'll take that as a no.
in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux logic.
So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
Is that a 'no'?
You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
counters yours.
On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't interested
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000I don't answer leading questions.
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth,
the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
conspiracy
- most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right wing,
because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their
salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid
leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can
be well misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not
right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
people who used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain
with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the
Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about climate
change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and
in general anything they take a political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we
will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what
reason would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
(shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
I'll take that as a no.
in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux logic.
So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't interested >>> in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux logic.
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000I don't answer leading questions.
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth, >>>>>>> the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
conspiracy
- most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right wing, >>>>>>> because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their >>>>>>> salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid >>>>>>> leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can >>>>>>> be well misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making >>>>>>> money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not >>>>>>> right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
people who used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from >>>>>>> within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*. >>>>>>>
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain >>>>>>> with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the >>>>>>> Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about climate >>>>>>> change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and >>>>>>> in general anything they take a political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we >>>>>>> will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what >>>>>>> reason would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
(shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
I'll take that as a no.
So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
Is that a 'no'?
You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
counters yours.
coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 12:48:01 +0000
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:Ooooh, a tetchy turnip.
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000I don't answer leading questions.
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth,
the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from
conspiracy
- most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their
salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right
wing, because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay
their salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely
so candid leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites
you read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she
can be well misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making
money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not
right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
people who used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from
within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact
*true*.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your
brain with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC
and the Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you
about climate change, immigration, economics, renewable energy
and net zero, and in general anything they take a political
stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we
will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*,
what reason would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
(shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
I'll take that as a no.
interested in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and
faux logic.
So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
I'll take that as an emphatic no.
On 01/01/2024 16:39, Tim Streater wrote:
On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't interested >>> in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux logic.
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000I don't answer leading questions.
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth, >>>>>>> the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from >>>>>>> conspiracy
- most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their >>>>>>> salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right wing, >>>>>>> because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their >>>>>>> salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid >>>>>>> leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can >>>>>>> be well misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making >>>>>>> money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not >>>>>>> right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
people who used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from >>>>>>> within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*. >>>>>>>
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain >>>>>>> with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the >>>>>>> Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about climate >>>>>>> change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and >>>>>>> in general anything they take a political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we >>>>>>> will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what >>>>>>> reason would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
(shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
I'll take that as a no.
So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
Is that a 'no'?
You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
counters yours.
coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
Left wing arseholes are traditionally ill educated.
On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 03:39:07 +1100, Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk>
wrote:
On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000I don't answer leading questions.
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth, >>>>>>>> the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from >>>>>>>> conspiracy
- most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their >>>>>>>> salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right wing, >>>>>>>> because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their >>>>>>>> salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid >>>>>>>> leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can >>>>>>>> be well misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making >>>>>>>> money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not >>>>>>>> right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the
people who used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from >>>>>>>> within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*. >>>>>>>>
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain >>>>>>>> with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the >>>>>>>> Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about climate >>>>>>>> change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and >>>>>>>> in general anything they take a political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we >>>>>>>> will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what >>>>>>>> reason would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
(shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
I'll take that as a no.
interested
in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux logic.
So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
Is that a 'no'?
You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
counters yours.
coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
Not if its a shit of an argument
In article <umv17k$2a28c$2@dont-email.me>,
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 01/01/2024 16:39, Tim Streater wrote:
On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't interested >>>>> in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux logic. >>>>>
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000I don't answer leading questions.
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth, >>>>>>>>> the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from >>>>>>>>> conspiracy
- most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their >>>>>>>>> salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right wing, >>>>>>>>> because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their >>>>>>>>> salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so candid >>>>>>>>> leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can >>>>>>>>> be well misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making >>>>>>>>> money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not >>>>>>>>> right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the >>>>>>>>> people who used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from >>>>>>>>> within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact *true*. >>>>>>>>>
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your brain >>>>>>>>> with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and the >>>>>>>>> Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about climate >>>>>>>>> change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, and >>>>>>>>> in general anything they take a political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we >>>>>>>>> will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, what >>>>>>>>> reason would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
(shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
I'll take that as a no.
So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
Is that a 'no'?
You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
counters yours.
coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
Left wing arseholes are traditionally ill educated.
Tam Dalyell went Eton and then Cambridge.
On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 09:27:08 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 03:39:07 +1100, Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk>
wrote:
On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Children! Behave yourselves!
If you want to squabble, see who can design the best electronics.
On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 10:11:06 +1100, John Larkin <jl@997pothill.com> wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 09:27:08 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 03:39:07 +1100, Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk>
wrote:
On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000I don't answer leading questions.
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some depth, >>>>>>>>>> the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from >>>>>>>>>> conspiracy
- most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their >>>>>>>>>> salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right >>>>>>>>>> wing,
because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay their >>>>>>>>>> salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so >>>>>>>>>> candid
leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you
read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she can >>>>>>>>>> be well misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists making >>>>>>>>>> money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's not >>>>>>>>>> right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the >>>>>>>>>> people who used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy from >>>>>>>>>> within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact >>>>>>>>>> *true*.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your >>>>>>>>>> brain
with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and >>>>>>>>>> the
Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about >>>>>>>>>> climate
change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, >>>>>>>>>> and
in general anything they take a political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and we >>>>>>>>>> will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, >>>>>>>>>> what
reason would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
(shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
I'll take that as a no.
interested
in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux logic. >>>>>>
So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
Is that a 'no'?
You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
counters yours.
coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
Not if its a shit of an argument
Children! Behave yourselves!
If you want to squabble, see who can design the best electronics.
Go and fuck yourself, again.
On 01/01/2024 21:08, charles wrote:
In article <umv17k$2a28c$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
<tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 01/01/2024 16:39, Tim Streater wrote:
On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:
On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000 The Natural PhilosopherWhich further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
<tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000 The Natural PhilosopherI don't answer leading questions. When did you stop fucking your >>>>>>> pet rabbit?
<tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000 Cursitor DoomNo, just a fruitcake.
<cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab? Anyone still >>>>>>>>>>> convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some >>>>>>>>> depth, the qualifications to distinguish reasonable
explanations from conspiracy - most academics are left wing, >>>>>>>>> because the gummint pays their salaries, most career scientists >>>>>>>>> and technologosts are right wing, because they know what works >>>>>>>>> - and the gummint doesn't pay their salaries - what position >>>>>>>>> you take depends ( as my rarely so candid leftard green vegan >>>>>>>>> sister remark 'on which websites you read' (she listens to the >>>>>>>>> BBC and reads the Guardian so she can be well misinformed). >>>>>>>>>
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists >>>>>>>>> making money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. >>>>>>>>> It's not right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring >>>>>>>>> by the people who used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy >>>>>>>>> from within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact >>>>>>>>> *true*.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your >>>>>>>>> brain with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the >>>>>>>>> BBC and the Guardian for all that. They are however lying to >>>>>>>>> you about climate change, immigration, economics, renewable >>>>>>>>> energy and net zero, and in general anything they take a
political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and >>>>>>>>> we will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, >>>>>>>>> what reason would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
(shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
I'll take that as a no.
interested in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and >>>>> faux logic.
So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
Is that a 'no'?
You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
counters yours.
coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
Left wing arseholes are traditionally ill educated.
Tam Dalyell went Eton and then Cambridge.
Shame he never learnt from the experience. He was, in my direct
experience, a total shit.
On 02/01/2024 08:00, charles wrote:
In article <umvhro$2c854$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 01/01/2024 21:08, charles wrote:
In article <umv17k$2a28c$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural PhilosopherShame he never learnt from the experience. He was, in my direct
<tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 01/01/2024 16:39, Tim Streater wrote:
On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>
On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000 The Natural PhilosopherWhich further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
<tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000 The Natural Philosopher >>>>>>>>>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:I don't answer leading questions. When did you stop fucking your >>>>>>>>> pet rabbit?
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000 Cursitor DoomNo, just a fruitcake.
<cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab? Anyone still >>>>>>>>>>>>> convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some >>>>>>>>>>> depth, the qualifications to distinguish reasonable
explanations from conspiracy - most academics are left wing, >>>>>>>>>>> because the gummint pays their salaries, most career scientists >>>>>>>>>>> and technologosts are right wing, because they know what works >>>>>>>>>>> - and the gummint doesn't pay their salaries - what position >>>>>>>>>>> you take depends ( as my rarely so candid leftard green vegan >>>>>>>>>>> sister remark 'on which websites you read' (she listens to the >>>>>>>>>>> BBC and reads the Guardian so she can be well misinformed). >>>>>>>>>>>
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists >>>>>>>>>>> making money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. >>>>>>>>>>> It's not right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring >>>>>>>>>>> by the people who used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy >>>>>>>>>>> from within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact >>>>>>>>>>> *true*.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your >>>>>>>>>>> brain with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the >>>>>>>>>>> BBC and the Guardian for all that. They are however lying to >>>>>>>>>>> you about climate change, immigration, economics, renewable >>>>>>>>>>> energy and net zero, and in general anything they take a >>>>>>>>>>> political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and >>>>>>>>>>> we will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, >>>>>>>>>>> what reason would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
(shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
I'll take that as a no.
interested in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and >>>>>>> faux logic.
So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
Is that a 'no'?
You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that >>>>>> counters yours.
coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
Left wing arseholes are traditionally ill educated.
Tam Dalyell went Eton and then Cambridge.
experience, a total shit.
so, you actually met him?
Not me. friend had extensive dealings with him. Tam encouraged him to
blow the whistle on his employers, which information Tam used to enhance
his career,
whilst my friend got the sack and was made unemployable.
In article <umvhro$2c854$1@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 01/01/2024 21:08, charles wrote:
In article <umv17k$2a28c$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural PhilosopherShame he never learnt from the experience. He was, in my direct
<tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 01/01/2024 16:39, Tim Streater wrote:
On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>
On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000 The Natural PhilosopherWhich further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
<tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000 The Natural Philosopher >>>>>>>>>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:I don't answer leading questions. When did you stop fucking your >>>>>>>>> pet rabbit?
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000 Cursitor DoomNo, just a fruitcake.
<cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab? Anyone still >>>>>>>>>>>>> convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some >>>>>>>>>>> depth, the qualifications to distinguish reasonable
explanations from conspiracy - most academics are left wing, >>>>>>>>>>> because the gummint pays their salaries, most career scientists >>>>>>>>>>> and technologosts are right wing, because they know what works >>>>>>>>>>> - and the gummint doesn't pay their salaries - what position >>>>>>>>>>> you take depends ( as my rarely so candid leftard green vegan >>>>>>>>>>> sister remark 'on which websites you read' (she listens to the >>>>>>>>>>> BBC and reads the Guardian so she can be well misinformed). >>>>>>>>>>>
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists >>>>>>>>>>> making money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. >>>>>>>>>>> It's not right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring >>>>>>>>>>> by the people who used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy >>>>>>>>>>> from within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact >>>>>>>>>>> *true*.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your >>>>>>>>>>> brain with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the >>>>>>>>>>> BBC and the Guardian for all that. They are however lying to >>>>>>>>>>> you about climate change, immigration, economics, renewable >>>>>>>>>>> energy and net zero, and in general anything they take a >>>>>>>>>>> political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and >>>>>>>>>>> we will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, >>>>>>>>>>> what reason would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
(shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
I'll take that as a no.
interested in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and >>>>>>> faux logic.
So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
Is that a 'no'?
You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that
counters yours.
coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
Left wing arseholes are traditionally ill educated.
Tam Dalyell went Eton and then Cambridge.
experience, a total shit.
so, you actually met him?
On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 14:19:03 +1100, John Larkin <jl@997pothill.com> wrote:
Electronics is way out of your league.
There you go, face down in the fucking mud, as always.
Done a hell of a lot more of that than you have ever done, thanks.
On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 14:19:03 +1100, John Larkin <jl@997pothill.com> wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 12:12:40 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 10:11:06 +1100, John Larkin <jl@997pothill.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 09:27:08 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 03:39:07 +1100, Tim Streater <tim@streater.me.uk> >>>>> wrote:
On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>
On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000I don't answer leading questions.
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some >>>>>>>>>>>> depth,
the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations from >>>>>>>>>>>> conspiracy
- most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays their >>>>>>>>>>>> salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right >>>>>>>>>>>> wing,
because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay >>>>>>>>>>>> their
salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so >>>>>>>>>>>> candid
leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you >>>>>>>>>>>> read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she >>>>>>>>>>>> can
be well misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists >>>>>>>>>>>> making
money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's >>>>>>>>>>>> not
right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the >>>>>>>>>>>> people who used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy >>>>>>>>>>>> from
within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact >>>>>>>>>>>> *true*.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your >>>>>>>>>>>> brain
with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC and >>>>>>>>>>>> the
Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about >>>>>>>>>>>> climate
change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net zero, >>>>>>>>>>>> and
in general anything they take a political stance on.
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us and >>>>>>>>>>>> we
will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, >>>>>>>>>>>> what
reason would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
(shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
I'll take that as a no.
interested
in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux
logic.
So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
Is that a 'no'?
You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that >>>>>>> counters yours.
coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
Not if its a shit of an argument
Children! Behave yourselves!
If you want to squabble, see who can design the best electronics.
Go and fuck yourself, again.
Gosh, you can't even design original insults.
You don't qualify for an original insult.
Plenty of others have done.
Electronics is way out of your league.
There you go, face down in the fucking mud, as always.
Done a hell of a lot more of that than you have ever done, thanks.
On Wed, 03 Jan 2024 03:19:05 +1100, John Larkin <jl@997pothill.com> wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 15:01:44 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 14:19:03 +1100, John Larkin <jl@997pothill.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 12:12:40 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 10:11:06 +1100, John Larkin <jl@997pothill.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 09:27:08 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jan 2024 03:39:07 +1100, Tim Streater
<tim@streater.me.uk>
wrote:
On 01 Jan 2024 at 16:33:21 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 01/01/2024 12:48, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 31/12/2023 16:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 16:49:04 +0000Which further reinforces your reputation as someone who isn't >>>>>>>>>> interested
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 28/12/2023 14:08, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:04:56 +0000I don't answer leading questions.
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 28/12/2023 08:21, Steve wrote:
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 00:54:57 +0000No, just a fruitcake.
Cursitor Doom <cd@notformail.com> wrote:
Thinking about getting a Covid booster jab?
Anyone still convinced Covid arose naturally?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/mrna-vaccines-must-be-banned-once-and-for-all/
Righttarded fruitcake.
The problem is that without a scientific education in some >>>>>>>>>>>>>> depth,
the qualifications to distinguish reasonable explanations >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
conspiracy
- most academics are left wing, because the gummint pays >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
salaries, most career scientists and technologosts are right >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wing,
because they know what works - and the gummint doesn't pay >>>>>>>>>>>>>> their
salaries - what position you take depends ( as my rarely so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> candid
leftard green vegan sister remark 'on which websites you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> read' (she listens to the BBC and reads the Guardian so she >>>>>>>>>>>>>> can
be well misinformed).
Toss in some Marxist rhetoric against the evil capitalists >>>>>>>>>>>>>> making
money, and you have the Anti-Science anti-Vax movement. It's >>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
right wing. It's not left wing, Its just shit stirring by the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> people who used to be in the Communist party.
De-stabilisation is what its called. Destroying a democracy >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
within by telling tales about its government.
The tragedy is that many of them (but not all) are in fact >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *true*.
E.g the gummint aren't injecting mind control chips into your >>>>>>>>>>>>>> brain
with Covid vaccines, they don't need to. They have the BBC >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
the
Guardian for all that. They are however lying to you about >>>>>>>>>>>>>> climate
change, immigration, economics, renewable energy and net >>>>>>>>>>>>>> zero,
and
in general anything they take a political stance on. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If you think about it, if a political party said 'elect us >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
we
will fix this serious problem ' and you did, *and they did*, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what
reason would they have to exist any more?
Look at UKIP...
Do you never tire of typing strident cobblers?
When did you stop fucking your pet rabbit?
(shades of Simply Red's 'Bunny's too tight to mention' @ >>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f95vD0EdyXg )
I'll take that as a no.
in debate, to learn - only to win through sophistry and faux >>>>>>>>>> logic.
So you are still fucking your pet rabbit, then?
Is that a 'no'?
You block everyone who can put together a cohesive argument that >>>>>>>>> counters yours.
coherent is probably the word you are looking for.
Not if its a shit of an argument
Children! Behave yourselves!
If you want to squabble, see who can design the best electronics.
Go and fuck yourself, again.
Gosh, you can't even design original insults.
You don't qualify for an original insult.
Plenty of others have done.
Electronics is way out of your league.
There you go, face down in the fucking mud, as always.
Done a hell of a lot more of that than you have ever done, thanks.
Show is a cool circuit that you have designed, and we'll have a
friendly discussion about it.
Go and fuck yourself, again.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 96:43:24 |
| Calls: | 6,719 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 12,252 |
| Messages: | 5,359,476 |
| Posted today: | 1 |