On 21/12/2023 12:27 pm, a a wrote:

On Wednesday 20 December 2023 at 16:00:20 UTC+1, Fred Bloggs wrote:

'Project Green Light uses artificial intelligence to optimize and alter intersections in order to minimize vehicles’ stopping and starting. Google reported that at busy intersections in cities, pollution can be 29 times higher than it is on open

roads, due to the environmental toll of cars stopping and starting again.'

The system is said be 'revolutionary' with 'shocking' beneficial impact on emissions and travel times.

https://www.thecooldown.com/green-tech/project-green-light-a-i-traffic-light-system/

Out with the old, in with the new. Just something else to get the change resistors up in arms. They'll probably claim an invasion of privacy issue.

Google is generally low-tech, low science today,
claiming innovations for self-promotion like Elon Musk.

A a would think that. He doesn't seem to know much, and most of what he
thinks he knows is flat-out wrong

Life is for real.

But a a isn't.

Ask Google to limit activities to manage marketing spam flooding Usenet Google Groups first.

They don't make any money out of that, so they haven't bothered to even try.

Just ask Google why their search engine fails to find anything reasonable by key words search,
generating delusional search results based on "what you get is what was paid".

A a's grasp of what is "reasonable" reflects the fact that he can't do
joined up reasoning. If he could reason for himself - and he clearly
can't - he could probably work out how to phrase questions that Google
could answer. He probably wouldn't like the answers.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydhney

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 21/12/2023 1:04 pm, a a wrote:

On Thursday 21 December 2023 at 02:54:34 UTC+1, Bill Sloman wrote:

On 21/12/2023 12:27 pm, a a wrote:

On Wednesday 20 December 2023 at 16:00:20 UTC+1, Fred Bloggs wrote:

'Project Green Light uses artificial intelligence to optimize and alter intersections in order to minimize vehicles’ stopping and starting. Google reported that at busy intersections in cities, pollution can be 29 times higher than it is on open

roads, due to the environmental toll of cars stopping and starting again.'

The system is said be 'revolutionary' with 'shocking' beneficial impact on emissions and travel times.

https://www.thecooldown.com/green-tech/project-green-light-a-i-traffic-light-system/

Out with the old, in with the new. Just something else to get the change resistors up in arms. They'll probably claim an invasion of privacy issue.

Google is generally low-tech, low science today,
claiming innovations for self-promotion like Elon Musk.

A a would think that. He doesn't seem to know much, and most of what he
thinks he knows is flat-out wrong

Life is for real.

But a a isn't.

Ask Google to limit activities to manage marketing spam flooding Usenet Google Groups first.

They don't make any money out of that, so they haven't bothered to even try. >>> Just ask Google why their search engine fails to find anything reasonable by key words search,

generating delusional search results based on "what you get is what was paid".

A a's grasp of what is "reasonable" reflects the fact that he can't do
joined up reasoning. If he could reason for himself - and he clearly
can't - he could probably work out how to phrase questions that Google
could answer. He probably wouldn't like the answers.

shut up idiot.

You are a the idiot here, and the rest of us would like it if you shut up.

take your pills and stay in bed.

I suppose that there a pills that would make me more tolerant of a a and
other idiots. I've not been offered them by my doctor, and I don't feel
any need to stay in bed longer than I already do.

A a might be less irritating if he stayed in bed longer, but only if the
bed was out of reach of internet access.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)