• Re: Using waste heat from PV panels to generate residential hot water

    From Phil Hobbs@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Wed Dec 13 13:28:08 2023
    On 2023-12-13 13:09, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    'Scientists in the United States has developed a new photovoltaic-thermal system design that utilizes parallel water pipes as a cooling system to reduce the operating temperature of photovoltaic panels. The waste heat generated by this process is then
    used to generate domestic hot water.'

    Main thing is a miniature 11W pump stopped the panel conversion efficiency from degrading by a full 4%. The hot water thing is an aside. Unless the installation is at a YMCA or something similar, the average residential water heater is going to, or
    actually must, divert the heat to prevent an overpressure release going off. Despite that it's a major cost advantage over those very expensive solar thermal heat collectors with sophisticated vacuum piping, circulating phase change medium, and all their
    controls and special heat storage auxiliary water tanks, like those stone-lined tanks.

    If that -0.45%/oC reduction in conversion efficiency is typical, it's a wonder the industry hasn't put more thought into cooling them.

    https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/12/12/using-waste-heat-from-pv-panels-to-generate-residential-hot-water/

    Flat panel thermal collectors were a thing back in 1980ish--I had a
    summer job building them, iirc 1979.

    What they actually did was preheat the input water to a normal HW tank.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs
    Principal Consultant
    ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
    Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
    Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

    http://electrooptical.net
    http://hobbs-eo.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com on Wed Dec 13 12:07:26 2023
    On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 10:09:11 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

    'Scientists in the United States has developed a new photovoltaic-thermal system design that utilizes parallel water pipes as a cooling system to reduce the operating temperature of photovoltaic panels. The waste heat generated by this process is then
    used to generate domestic hot water.'

    Main thing is a miniature 11W pump stopped the panel conversion efficiency from degrading by a full 4%. The hot water thing is an aside. Unless the installation is at a YMCA or something similar, the average residential water heater is going to, or
    actually must, divert the heat to prevent an overpressure release going off. Despite that it's a major cost advantage over those very expensive solar thermal heat collectors with sophisticated vacuum piping, circulating phase change medium, and all their
    controls and special heat storage auxiliary water tanks, like those stone-lined tanks.

    If that -0.45%/oC reduction in conversion efficiency is typical, it's a wonder the industry hasn't put more thought into cooling them.

    https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/12/12/using-waste-heat-from-pv-panels-to-generate-residential-hot-water/

    That sounds economically absurd.

    And why would this be a eureka-level invention now?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Y@21:1/5 to Phil Hobbs on Wed Dec 13 13:48:06 2023
    On 12/13/2023 11:28 AM, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    On 2023-12-13 13:09, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    'Scientists in the United States has developed a new photovoltaic-thermal
    system design that utilizes parallel water pipes as a cooling system to
    reduce the operating temperature of photovoltaic panels. The waste heat
    generated by this process is then used to generate domestic hot water.'

    Main thing is a miniature 11W pump stopped the panel conversion efficiency >> from degrading by a full 4%. The hot water thing is an aside. Unless the
    installation is at a YMCA or something similar, the average residential water
    heater is going to, or actually must, divert the heat to prevent an
    overpressure release going off. Despite that it's a major cost advantage over
    those very expensive solar thermal heat collectors with sophisticated vacuum >> piping, circulating phase change medium, and all their controls and special >> heat storage auxiliary water tanks, like those stone-lined tanks.

    If that -0.45%/oC reduction in conversion efficiency is typical, it's a
    wonder the industry hasn't put more thought into cooling them.

    https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/12/12/using-waste-heat-from-pv-panels-to-generate-residential-hot-water/

    Flat panel thermal collectors were a thing back in 1980ish--I had a summer job
    building them, iirc 1979.

    What they actually did was preheat the input water to a normal HW tank.

    Depends on the water temperature and volume available:

    <https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article/1766/1/020006/786702/REhnu-dish-based-CPV-Module-performance-and>

    Click "PDF" link for actual article.

    You can also use waste heat from an ACbrrrr:

    <https://www.homedepot.com/c/ah/how-to-heat-a-swimming-pool-with-an-air-conditioner/9ba683603be9fa5395fab901a118c138>

    You can also make use of shade from overhead panels (many parking lots,
    here, are now "covered" thereby protecting the vehicles parked under
    them as well as cutting down their cooling load when reoccupied).

    And, use them to reduce evaporation:

    <https://www.abc15.com/news/local-news/gila-river-indian-community-breaks-ground-on-installing-solar-panels-over-canal>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Hobbs@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Wed Dec 13 18:01:16 2023
    On 2023-12-13 13:44, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Wednesday, December 13, 2023 at 1:28:27 PM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs
    wrote:
    On 2023-12-13 13:09, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    'Scientists in the United States has developed a new
    photovoltaic-thermal system design that utilizes parallel water
    pipes as a cooling system to reduce the operating temperature of
    photovoltaic panels. The waste heat generated by this process is
    then used to generate domestic hot water.'

    Main thing is a miniature 11W pump stopped the panel conversion
    efficiency from degrading by a full 4%. The hot water thing is
    an aside. Unless the installation is at a YMCA or something
    similar, the average residential water heater is going to, or
    actually must, divert the heat to prevent an overpressure release
    going off. Despite that it's a major cost advantage over those
    very expensive solar thermal heat collectors with sophisticated
    vacuum piping, circulating phase change medium, and all their
    controls and special heat storage auxiliary water tanks, like
    those stone-lined tanks.

    If that -0.45%/oC reduction in conversion efficiency is typical,
    it's a wonder the industry hasn't put more thought into cooling
    them.

    https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/12/12/using-waste-heat-from-pv-panels-to-generate-residential-hot-water/

    Flat panel thermal collectors were a thing back in 1980ish--I had

    a summer job building them, iirc 1979.

    What they actually did was preheat the input water to a normal HW
    tank.

    I think you'll find the more modern versions produce much hotter
    water, hence all the insulation schemes.

    You can't do that unless you're okay running your photovoltaic panels at upwards of 70 C. Second law of thermodynamics, and all that.

    Concentrator panels run much hotter than that, of course.

    'Flat plate solar collectors can reach temperatures as high as 200°C (395°F), and evacuated-tube collectors can reach temperatures as high
    as 295°C (563°F). It is important to be aware that solar glycol will
    begin to break down when temperatures exceed 150-200°C for long
    periods of time.'

    https://www.ecohome.net/guides/3297/product-of-the-month-solar-water-heater-with-overheating-protection/


    'Evacuated-tube solar collectors They feature parallel rows of
    transparent glass tubes. Each tube contains a glass outer tube and
    metal absorber tube attached to a fin. The fin's coating absorbs
    solar energy but inhibits radiative heat loss. These collectors are
    used more frequently for U.S. commercial applications.'

    https://www.energy.gov/energysaver/solar-water-heaters

    Sure, we were using selective coatings too, though not vacuum. But you
    aren't using those to improve photovoltaic efficiency.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs
    Principal Consultant
    ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
    Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
    Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

    http://electrooptical.net
    http://hobbs-eo.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Brown@21:1/5 to Phil Hobbs on Thu Dec 14 10:57:54 2023
    On 13/12/2023 18:28, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    On 2023-12-13 13:09, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    'Scientists in the United States has developed a new
    photovoltaic-thermal system design that utilizes parallel water pipes
    as a cooling system to reduce the operating temperature of
    photovoltaic panels. The waste heat generated by this process is then
    used to generate domestic hot water.'

    Main thing is a miniature 11W pump stopped the panel conversion
    efficiency from degrading by a full 4%. The hot water thing is an
    aside. Unless the installation is at a YMCA or something similar, the
    average residential water heater is going to, or actually must, divert
    the heat to prevent an overpressure release going off. Despite that
    it's a major cost advantage over those very expensive solar thermal
    heat collectors with sophisticated vacuum piping, circulating phase
    change medium, and all their controls and special heat storage
    auxiliary water tanks, like those stone-lined tanks.

    If that -0.45%/oC reduction in conversion efficiency is typical, it's
    a wonder the industry hasn't put more thought into cooling them.

    https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/12/12/using-waste-heat-from-pv-panels-to-generate-residential-hot-water/

    Flat panel thermal collectors were a thing back in 1980ish--I had a
    summer job building them, iirc 1979.

    That sounds about right - in the aftermath of the first OPEC induced oil crisis. I worked on something similar about then too. I still have a
    couple of good books from that era on alternative energy...

    ISTR there were slightly more sophisticated ones that had a modest sized
    water tank at the top of the panel which thermal syphoning would allow
    to get to quite a respectable temperature (at least on a sunny day) and
    then a second heat exchange circuit to move that heat to where it was
    needed in the domestic HW tank.

    What they actually did was preheat the input water to a normal HW tank.

    Or preheat the water to one of the fancier ones. ISTR simple FPC were
    popular in California back then for heating outdoor swimming pool water.

    --
    Martin Brown

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Hobbs@21:1/5 to Martin Brown on Thu Dec 14 12:48:56 2023
    Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote:
    On 13/12/2023 18:28, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    On 2023-12-13 13:09, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    'Scientists in the United States has developed a new
    photovoltaic-thermal system design that utilizes parallel water pipes
    as a cooling system to reduce the operating temperature of
    photovoltaic panels. The waste heat generated by this process is then
    used to generate domestic hot water.'

    Main thing is a miniature 11W pump stopped the panel conversion
    efficiency from degrading by a full 4%. The hot water thing is an
    aside. Unless the installation is at a YMCA or something similar, the
    average residential water heater is going to, or actually must, divert
    the heat to prevent an overpressure release going off. Despite that
    it's a major cost advantage over those very expensive solar thermal
    heat collectors with sophisticated vacuum piping, circulating phase
    change medium, and all their controls and special heat storage
    auxiliary water tanks, like those stone-lined tanks.

    If that -0.45%/oC reduction in conversion efficiency is typical, it's
    a wonder the industry hasn't put more thought into cooling them.

    https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/12/12/using-waste-heat-from-pv-panels-to-generate-residential-hot-water/

    Flat panel thermal collectors were a thing back in 1980ish--I had a
    summer job building them, iirc 1979.

    That sounds about right - in the aftermath of the first OPEC induced oil crisis. I worked on something similar about then too. I still have a
    couple of good books from that era on alternative energy...

    ISTR there were slightly more sophisticated ones that had a modest sized water tank at the top of the panel which thermal syphoning would allow
    to get to quite a respectable temperature (at least on a sunny day) and
    then a second heat exchange circuit to move that heat to where it was
    needed in the domestic HW tank.

    What they actually did was preheat the input water to a normal HW tank.

    Or preheat the water to one of the fancier ones. ISTR simple FPC were
    popular in California back then for heating outdoor swimming pool water.


    Pool collectors made much more sense, then and now. They don’t need an insulated box, for one thing.

    These were all-copper and self-draining, with a manifold top and bottom,
    and parallel tubes soldered to flashing-copper absorbers.

    We used a neat little tool to make the manifolds—it was sort of like making spun-aluminum bowls. It had a screw+nut arrangement with a small ball on a hook. You drilled a small hole, stuck the hook in, and twisted the screw
    part so that the hook pulled the metal out into a tee fitting.

    Each manifold had eight or ten of them. They weren’t long or smooth enough
    to use like a normal sweat fitting, so the parallel tubes were brazed on.
    That annealed the copper too, which helped prevent leaks.

    Fun job, for three months at least.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs
    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Y@21:1/5 to Martin Brown on Thu Dec 14 08:07:44 2023
    On 12/14/2023 3:57 AM, Martin Brown wrote:
    Or preheat the water to one of the fancier ones. ISTR simple FPC were popular in California back then for heating outdoor swimming pool water.

    Here, many pools are "heated" using just "miles" of black nylon (?) pipe
    lying -- coiled -- on rooftops.

    A smarter and cheaper way is to cover the surface of the water with
    a large sheet of "bubble-wrap" (floats) to trap the heat gained from
    solar exposure. This will easily yield 105+ degree water temperatures
    (which actually is a bit uncomfortable).

    It also has the benefits of keeping airborne cruft out of the water
    (droppings from nearby palms) AND cutting evaporative losses. It's
    not uncommon to lose ~1/2 inches each *day* in Summer; maybe half that
    in Winter (hard to estimate Monsoon losses as rainwater adds to the pool).

    Of course, automatic filler hides that chore from you -- until the monthly water/sewer bill arrives!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From boB@21:1/5 to blockedofcourse@foo.invalid on Thu Dec 14 10:21:50 2023
    On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:07:44 -0700, Don Y
    <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    On 12/14/2023 3:57 AM, Martin Brown wrote:
    Or preheat the water to one of the fancier ones. ISTR simple FPC were popular
    in California back then for heating outdoor swimming pool water.

    Here, many pools are "heated" using just "miles" of black nylon (?) pipe >lying -- coiled -- on rooftops.

    A smarter and cheaper way is to cover the surface of the water with
    a large sheet of "bubble-wrap" (floats) to trap the heat gained from
    solar exposure. This will easily yield 105+ degree water temperatures
    (which actually is a bit uncomfortable).

    It also has the benefits of keeping airborne cruft out of the water >(droppings from nearby palms) AND cutting evaporative losses. It's
    not uncommon to lose ~1/2 inches each *day* in Summer; maybe half that
    in Winter (hard to estimate Monsoon losses as rainwater adds to the pool).

    Of course, automatic filler hides that chore from you -- until the monthly >water/sewer bill arrives!


    An easier use case would be to use extra energy from the PV when you
    can't sell back to grid, power the house or charge the batteries.

    boB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to blockedofcourse@foo.invalid on Thu Dec 14 11:03:38 2023
    On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:07:44 -0700, Don Y
    <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    On 12/14/2023 3:57 AM, Martin Brown wrote:
    Or preheat the water to one of the fancier ones. ISTR simple FPC were popular
    in California back then for heating outdoor swimming pool water.

    Here, many pools are "heated" using just "miles" of black nylon (?) pipe >lying -- coiled -- on rooftops.

    A smarter and cheaper way is to cover the surface of the water with
    a large sheet of "bubble-wrap" (floats) to trap the heat gained from
    solar exposure. This will easily yield 105+ degree water temperatures
    (which actually is a bit uncomfortable).

    It also has the benefits of keeping airborne cruft out of the water >(droppings from nearby palms) AND cutting evaporative losses. It's
    not uncommon to lose ~1/2 inches each *day* in Summer; maybe half that
    in Winter (hard to estimate Monsoon losses as rainwater adds to the pool).

    Of course, automatic filler hides that chore from you -- until the monthly >water/sewer bill arrives!

    A home swimming pool seems like a huge nuisance to me. And if you have
    small kids, about the most deadly thing around.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Y@21:1/5 to boB on Thu Dec 14 12:53:03 2023
    On 12/14/2023 10:21 AM, boB wrote:
    On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:07:44 -0700, Don Y
    <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:

    On 12/14/2023 3:57 AM, Martin Brown wrote:
    Or preheat the water to one of the fancier ones. ISTR simple FPC were popular
    in California back then for heating outdoor swimming pool water.

    Here, many pools are "heated" using just "miles" of black nylon (?) pipe
    lying -- coiled -- on rooftops.

    A smarter and cheaper way is to cover the surface of the water with
    a large sheet of "bubble-wrap" (floats) to trap the heat gained from
    solar exposure. This will easily yield 105+ degree water temperatures
    (which actually is a bit uncomfortable).

    It also has the benefits of keeping airborne cruft out of the water
    (droppings from nearby palms) AND cutting evaporative losses. It's
    not uncommon to lose ~1/2 inches each *day* in Summer; maybe half that
    in Winter (hard to estimate Monsoon losses as rainwater adds to the pool). >>
    Of course, automatic filler hides that chore from you -- until the monthly >> water/sewer bill arrives!

    An easier use case would be to use extra energy from the PV when you
    can't sell back to grid, power the house or charge the batteries.

    Apparently takes a shitload of energy to heat 15000G of water that is open
    to the environment. (I don't know how this changes for folks with
    *indoor* pools; I will have to ask my friends) E.g., I see 100KBTU
    gas-fired heaters (30KW?) driving pools.

    Most PV installations here are <~ 10KW so you really don't have much to
    spare -- especially if you are powering refrigeration with "your"
    electrons. The utility seems to have a say in just how big a PV
    installation can be... perhaps only if grid tied? (We're looking
    at installing ~5KW but NOT grid tied)

    I think the better/cleverer way (for pools) is to use waste heat from the ACbrrrr. E.g., a typical 4T ACbrrr would move 48K BTU which is ballpark
    with the gas-fired heater. *And*, the pool would most likely WANT to
    be used when the ACbrrr is also likely to be "needed".

    But, I see fewer and fewer folks using their *installed* pools. I
    suspect some of it is age-related (kids seem to be the main motivator
    for having a pool). Most of our friends with pools just pay to maintain them and never actually *use* them (unless the grandkids come for a visit).

    Sadly, once you have a pool, you *must* maintain it. Draining it will
    ruin the liner. Leaving it full (paying for evaporative losses) means
    you need to keep the chemistry correct or risk it going south (a code violation, here). "Taking out" a pool is almost as expensive as putting
    one *in*!

    Finally, most are little more than big bathtubs... you can't swim laps
    in a backyard (if I kick off from *any* wall in *any* residential pool,
    here, I'll hit the far wall before I can take my first stroke!).

    *If* you are willing to sacrifice yard space for a "water feature"
    (that is NOT a fountain), your best bet is an "infinite pool".
    This can be smaller (and more useful) than a nominal pool *or* a
    "spa"/hottub. But, you're still stuck with all the maintenance
    issues. How likely are you to "swim laps" to make use of it?

    [We opted against a pool when selecting a home, here, as we didn't want
    the maintenance/liability issues and didn't want to deprive the puppy
    monsters of a yard in which to play. I can get 30 minutes of daily
    exercise for a 32 minute investment -- the two minutes required to
    put shoes on before heading out for a walk. Swimming has far more
    overhead.]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)