• Cheap pulse 1:1 transformer

    From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 9 15:14:53 2023
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lasse Langwadt Christensen@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 9 15:40:08 2023
    fredag den 10. november 2023 kl. 00.14.58 UTC+1 skrev Klaus Kragelund:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.


    why a transformer instead of an isolated driver?

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    seems to me DK has plenty of 1:1 pulse transformers much cheaper than that double inductor

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/filter/pulse-transformers/166

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to Lasse Langwadt Christensen on Thu Nov 9 16:15:33 2023
    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 00:40:13 UTC+1, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
    fredag den 10. november 2023 kl. 00.14.58 UTC+1 skrev Klaus Kragelund:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    why a transformer instead of an isolated driver?
    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?
    seems to me DK has plenty of 1:1 pulse transformers much cheaper than that double inductor

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/filter/pulse-transformers/166

    Yeah, I was looking at those. But except for LAN transformers, they approach 1USD/pcs, which is awful high

    I was even thinking doing a planar transformer, but production assembly of ferrites are not straight forward

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to Klaus Kragelund on Thu Nov 9 16:30:25 2023
    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 01:15:37 UTC+1, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 00:40:13 UTC+1, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
    fredag den 10. november 2023 kl. 00.14.58 UTC+1 skrev Klaus Kragelund:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    why a transformer instead of an isolated driver?
    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?
    seems to me DK has plenty of 1:1 pulse transformers much cheaper than that double inductor

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/filter/pulse-transformers/166
    Yeah, I was looking at those. But except for LAN transformers, they approach 1USD/pcs, which is awful high

    I was even thinking doing a planar transformer, but production assembly of ferrites are not straight forward
    Speaking of LCSC, it's quite amazing that one can get a transformer like this for less than 10cents:

    https://www.lcsc.com/product-detail/RJ45-Transformer_CND-tek-TF-1601DG_C408875.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From piglet@21:1/5 to Klaus Kragelund on Fri Nov 10 09:34:21 2023
    On 09/11/2023 23:14, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Dual inductors (like DRQ family) have super coupling but high
    winding-winding capacitance and insulation is just the minimal enamel so useless for anything HV.

    I have even used low cost Murata and Panasonic common mode chokes as HV separated gate driver transformers!

    piglet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to piglet on Fri Nov 10 05:08:35 2023
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 8:34:30 PM UTC+11, piglet wrote:
    On 09/11/2023 23:14, Klaus Kragelund wrote:

    <snip>

    Dual inductors (like DRQ family) have super coupling but high winding-winding capacitance and insulation is just the minimal enamel so useless for anything HV.

    The classic examples are bifilar wound - with twisted pair - and can be 1:1 to one part per billion. They can still have appreciable inductance, but at least it is exactly the same for each side. It takes an effort to get 10:1 ratio transfomers as good
    as one part in 10 million

    I have even used low cost Murata and Panasonic common mode chokes as HV separated gate driver transformers!

    Sounds credible.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From legg@21:1/5 to klaus.kragelund@gmail.com on Fri Nov 10 08:22:50 2023
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 16:30:25 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.kragelund@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 01:15:37 UTC+1, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 00:40:13 UTC+1, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
    fredag den 10. november 2023 kl. 00.14.58 UTC+1 skrev Klaus Kragelund:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    why a transformer instead of an isolated driver?
    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?
    seems to me DK has plenty of 1:1 pulse transformers much cheaper than that double inductor

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/filter/pulse-transformers/166
    Yeah, I was looking at those. But except for LAN transformers, they approach 1USD/pcs, which is awful high

    I was even thinking doing a planar transformer, but production assembly of ferrites are not straight forward
    Speaking of LCSC, it's quite amazing that one can get a transformer like this for less than 10cents:

    https://www.lcsc.com/product-detail/RJ45-Transformer_CND-tek-TF-1601DG_C408875.html

    If you stick to core shapes that are used in volume, you can
    get volume pricing on any drawing and spec from off-shore mfrs.

    CCFL or LED <8W ballasts, or USB wallwarts are a good place to get
    an idea of what's used in this market.

    That's what north american suppliers do, with ~ 500% mark-up.

    . . . or you can just buy off the shelf from off-shore vendors
    with one-time-buy volumes. 10K at $0.10 . . . that's a few day's
    tech labor in NA . . less than you will probably spend to process
    the paperwork.

    Sigh.

    RL

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to legg on Fri Nov 10 06:07:16 2023
    On Saturday, November 11, 2023 at 12:28:17 AM UTC+11, legg wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    There's not a lot of smart transformer design discussed here. John Larkin seems to think that you ought to ignore the possibility - anything that you can buy off the shelf trumps anything that you might design, but then again he claims to get away with
    ignoring the parallel capacitance of transformer windings, which is bizarre,

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From legg@21:1/5 to klaus.kragelund@gmail.com on Fri Nov 10 08:28:15 2023
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.kragelund@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to legg on Fri Nov 10 07:22:13 2023
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund ><klaus.kragelund@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127
    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to klaus.kragelund@gmail.com on Fri Nov 10 07:27:31 2023
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.kragelund@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Hobbs@21:1/5 to John Larkin on Fri Nov 10 16:24:00 2023
    John Larkin <jl@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.kragelund@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it
    to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.



    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with
    its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main
    FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off.
    It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to Klaus Kragelund on Fri Nov 10 08:37:45 2023
    On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 6:14:58 PM UTC-5, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    If you're looking for cheap, you can't beat capacitor coupling the gate drive. Phillips has a whole chapter in their MOSFET applications handbook on how to do this reliably-wasn't in the market for the technique at the time and skipped it.

    see page 36 AC-Coupled Gate-Drive Circuits

    https://www.ti.com/lit/ml/slua618a/slua618a.pdf

    Looks like the internet lost the Philips handbook...



    Cheers

    Klaus

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin@21:1/5 to pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical. on Fri Nov 10 10:27:02 2023
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:24:00 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    John Larkin <jl@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.kragelund@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it >>>> to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.



    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with
    its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main >FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main >FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off.
    It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    Clever.

    Given a floating power supply, a dc/dc converter or equivalent, the
    small tranny can drive a gate driver chip. The tranny can also conduct
    tiny spikes at the leading and trailing edge of the pulse, and drive a
    highside flop or schmitt.

    In my youth, I invented the dual optocoupler totem pole fet gate
    driver. That needs a floating power supply, a dc/dc or a PV coupler or
    a bootstrap supply or something. Slow but nice.

    Nowadays a fast logic coupler can drive a fast gate driver chip.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lasse Langwadt Christensen@21:1/5 to All on Fri Nov 10 11:01:55 2023
    fredag den 10. november 2023 kl. 19.27.19 UTC+1 skrev john larkin:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:24:00 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote: >>
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it >>>> to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.



    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with >its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main >FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main >FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off. >It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs
    Clever.

    Given a floating power supply, a dc/dc converter or equivalent, the
    small tranny can drive a gate driver chip. The tranny can also conduct
    tiny spikes at the leading and trailing edge of the pulse, and drive a highside flop or schmitt.

    so basically an analogdevices iCoupler

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to john larkin on Fri Nov 10 11:22:55 2023
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 1:27:19 PM UTC-5, john larkin wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:24:00 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote: >>
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it >>>> to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.



    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with >its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main >FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main >FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off. >It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs
    Clever.

    Given a floating power supply, a dc/dc converter or equivalent, the
    small tranny can drive a gate driver chip. The tranny can also conduct
    tiny spikes at the leading and trailing edge of the pulse, and drive a highside flop or schmitt.

    In my youth, I invented the dual optocoupler totem pole fet gate
    driver. That needs a floating power supply, a dc/dc or a PV coupler or
    a bootstrap supply or something. Slow but nice.

    Nowadays a fast logic coupler can drive a fast gate driver chip.

    If the application is for a MOSFET analog switch, switching speed is not of the essence, duty is very low.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to Phil Hobbs on Fri Nov 10 11:20:34 2023
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 11:24:08 AM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it >>> to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.


    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off. It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    How does that increase volt-seconds?

    It's just a single component replacement of the reverse biased gate discharge speed-up transistor technique. PNP used on NFET.


    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From piglet@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Fri Nov 10 19:41:50 2023
    On 10/11/2023 7:20 pm, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 11:24:08 AM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it >>>>> to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.


    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with >> its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main >> FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main >> FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off. >> It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    How does that increase volt-seconds?

    It's just a single component replacement of the reverse biased gate discharge speed-up transistor technique. PNP used on NFET.


    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC /
    Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

    I suppose it doesn't really increase volt-seconds asmuch as allow a
    lower v-s rated transformer to be used.

    Between the initial turn-on and the turn-off the main transistor gate is
    held up by its own (or the added) capacitance so it doesn't matter if
    the transformer induced secondary voltage collapses.

    piglet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin@21:1/5 to bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com on Fri Nov 10 12:09:55 2023
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:22:55 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 1:27:19?PM UTC-5, john larkin wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:24:00 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
    <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote: >> >>
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it >> >>>> to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.



    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with
    its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main >> >FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. ) >> >
    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main >> >FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off. >> >It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs
    Clever.

    Given a floating power supply, a dc/dc converter or equivalent, the
    small tranny can drive a gate driver chip. The tranny can also conduct
    tiny spikes at the leading and trailing edge of the pulse, and drive a
    highside flop or schmitt.

    In my youth, I invented the dual optocoupler totem pole fet gate
    driver. That needs a floating power supply, a dc/dc or a PV coupler or
    a bootstrap supply or something. Slow but nice.

    Nowadays a fast logic coupler can drive a fast gate driver chip.

    If the application is for a MOSFET analog switch, switching speed is not of the essence, duty is very low.

    May as well buy an SSR.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin@21:1/5 to langwadt@fonz.dk on Fri Nov 10 12:08:59 2023
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:01:55 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:

    fredag den 10. november 2023 kl. 19.27.19 UTC+1 skrev john larkin:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:24:00 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
    <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote: >> >>
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it >> >>>> to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.



    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with
    its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main >> >FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. ) >> >
    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main >> >FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off. >> >It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs
    Clever.

    Given a floating power supply, a dc/dc converter or equivalent, the
    small tranny can drive a gate driver chip. The tranny can also conduct
    tiny spikes at the leading and trailing edge of the pulse, and drive a
    highside flop or schmitt.

    so basically an analogdevices iCoupler


    Eventually most every clever circuit design gets pre-empted by some
    cheap nasty little IC.

    So we need to keep inventing ever-goofier circuits. I can do that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From boB@21:1/5 to john larkin on Fri Nov 10 12:18:41 2023
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 10:27:02 -0800, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:24:00 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs ><pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    John Larkin <jl@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.kragelund@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it >>>>> to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.



    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with >>its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main >>FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. ) >>
    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main >>FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off. >>It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    Clever.

    Given a floating power supply, a dc/dc converter or equivalent, the
    small tranny can drive a gate driver chip. The tranny can also conduct
    tiny spikes at the leading and trailing edge of the pulse, and drive a >highside flop or schmitt.

    In my youth, I invented the dual optocoupler totem pole fet gate
    driver. That needs a floating power supply, a dc/dc or a PV coupler or
    a bootstrap supply or something. Slow but nice.

    Nowadays a fast logic coupler can drive a fast gate driver chip.


    Klauss's example is an inductor, not a transformer. Well, it could
    work as a transformer but not a great one.

    A real pulse transformer would probably work better. One without a
    gap or distributed gap.

    I was just making a non-synchronous buck converter and a small (1/4"
    square or so) sqyare EE on small bobbin worked fine to make a floating
    supply to drive the FETs.

    Yes, AC coupling and clamp diode used.

    boB

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Hobbs@21:1/5 to piglet on Fri Nov 10 23:24:41 2023
    piglet <erichpwagner@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 10/11/2023 7:20 pm, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 11:24:08 AM UTC-5, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote: >>>>
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it >>>>>> to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.


    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with >>> its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main >>> FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main >>> FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off. >>> It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    How does that increase volt-seconds?

    It's just a single component replacement of the reverse biased gate
    discharge speed-up transistor technique. PNP used on NFET.


    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / >>> Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

    I suppose it doesn't really increase volt-seconds asmuch as allow a
    lower v-s rated transformer to be used.

    Between the initial turn-on and the turn-off the main transistor gate is
    held up by its own (or the added) capacitance so it doesn't matter if
    the transformer induced secondary voltage collapses.

    piglet



    Yeah, the idea is to make the available voltseconds go further—like putting cornflakes in the meatloaf.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to john larkin on Fri Nov 10 16:27:25 2023
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 3:10:07 PM UTC-5, john larkin wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:22:55 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 1:27:19?PM UTC-5, john larkin wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:24:00 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
    <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it
    to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive >> >> a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.



    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with
    its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main
    FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main
    FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off.
    It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs
    Clever.

    Given a floating power supply, a dc/dc converter or equivalent, the
    small tranny can drive a gate driver chip. The tranny can also conduct
    tiny spikes at the leading and trailing edge of the pulse, and drive a
    highside flop or schmitt.

    In my youth, I invented the dual optocoupler totem pole fet gate
    driver. That needs a floating power supply, a dc/dc or a PV coupler or
    a bootstrap supply or something. Slow but nice.

    Nowadays a fast logic coupler can drive a fast gate driver chip.

    If the application is for a MOSFET analog switch, switching speed is not of the essence, duty is very low.
    May as well buy an SSR.

    Sounds like it's not quite the same as a pulsed drive. The switch is turned on and stays on indefinitely etc...you can't do that with an ac pulsed drive.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com on Fri Nov 10 18:45:34 2023
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:27:25 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 3:10:07?PM UTC-5, john larkin wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:22:55 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 1:27:19?PM UTC-5, john larkin wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:24:00 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
    <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it
    to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive >> >> >> a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.



    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with >> >> >its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main
    FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main
    FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off.
    It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs
    Clever.

    Given a floating power supply, a dc/dc converter or equivalent, the
    small tranny can drive a gate driver chip. The tranny can also conduct
    tiny spikes at the leading and trailing edge of the pulse, and drive a
    highside flop or schmitt.

    In my youth, I invented the dual optocoupler totem pole fet gate
    driver. That needs a floating power supply, a dc/dc or a PV coupler or
    a bootstrap supply or something. Slow but nice.

    Nowadays a fast logic coupler can drive a fast gate driver chip.

    If the application is for a MOSFET analog switch, switching speed is not of the essence, duty is very low.
    May as well buy an SSR.

    Sounds like it's not quite the same as a pulsed drive. The switch is turned on and stays on indefinitely etc...you can't do that with an ac pulsed drive.

    Some of the bidirectional LED-mosfet SSRs have zero offset, a few ohms
    Ron, and picoamp leakage. 1 mA drive is usually plenty.

    Switching times are in the ballpark of 1 ms.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to John Larkin on Sat Nov 11 04:00:11 2023
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 9:46:16 PM UTC-5, John Larkin wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:27:25 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 3:10:07?PM UTC-5, john larkin wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:22:55 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 1:27:19?PM UTC-5, john larkin wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:24:00 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
    <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it
    to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look >> >> >> good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.



    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with
    its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main
    FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main
    FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off.
    It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs
    Clever.

    Given a floating power supply, a dc/dc converter or equivalent, the
    small tranny can drive a gate driver chip. The tranny can also conduct >> >> tiny spikes at the leading and trailing edge of the pulse, and drive a >> >> highside flop or schmitt.

    In my youth, I invented the dual optocoupler totem pole fet gate
    driver. That needs a floating power supply, a dc/dc or a PV coupler or >> >> a bootstrap supply or something. Slow but nice.

    Nowadays a fast logic coupler can drive a fast gate driver chip.

    If the application is for a MOSFET analog switch, switching speed is not of the essence, duty is very low.
    May as well buy an SSR.

    Sounds like it's not quite the same as a pulsed drive. The switch is turned on and stays on indefinitely etc...you can't do that with an ac pulsed drive.
    Some of the bidirectional LED-mosfet SSRs have zero offset, a few ohms
    Ron, and picoamp leakage. 1 mA drive is usually plenty.

    Switching times are in the ballpark of 1 ms.

    Most be using those PV gate drives... Conceptualizing the electronics is relatively simple, the hard part is armor plating it against the real world, the mains are really harsh. Then if the transient protection overreacts in the wrong way, you can
    trigger a trip on the smart circuit protection technology these days. Things like nuisance tripping, death by transient, smoke or other odd odors, are not good public relations.

    https://www.emc-directory.com/community/what-is-a-power-line-transient

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com on Sat Nov 11 07:31:12 2023
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 04:00:11 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 9:46:16?PM UTC-5, John Larkin wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:27:25 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 3:10:07?PM UTC-5, john larkin wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:22:55 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 1:27:19?PM UTC-5, john larkin wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:24:00 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
    <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it
    to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look >> >> >> >> good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.



    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with
    its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main
    FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main
    FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off.
    It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs
    Clever.

    Given a floating power supply, a dc/dc converter or equivalent, the
    small tranny can drive a gate driver chip. The tranny can also conduct >> >> >> tiny spikes at the leading and trailing edge of the pulse, and drive a >> >> >> highside flop or schmitt.

    In my youth, I invented the dual optocoupler totem pole fet gate
    driver. That needs a floating power supply, a dc/dc or a PV coupler or >> >> >> a bootstrap supply or something. Slow but nice.

    Nowadays a fast logic coupler can drive a fast gate driver chip.

    If the application is for a MOSFET analog switch, switching speed is not of the essence, duty is very low.
    May as well buy an SSR.

    Sounds like it's not quite the same as a pulsed drive. The switch is turned on and stays on indefinitely etc...you can't do that with an ac pulsed drive.
    Some of the bidirectional LED-mosfet SSRs have zero offset, a few ohms
    Ron, and picoamp leakage. 1 mA drive is usually plenty.

    Switching times are in the ballpark of 1 ms.

    Most be using those PV gate drives... Conceptualizing the electronics is relatively simple, the hard part is armor plating it against the real world, the mains are really harsh. Then if the transient protection overreacts in the wrong way, you can
    trigger a trip on the smart circuit protection technology these days. Things like nuisance tripping, death by transient, smoke or other odd odors, are not good public relations.

    https://www.emc-directory.com/community/what-is-a-power-line-transient

    The CPC1540GS is claimed to be self-protecting, and it is to maybe 40
    volts. It's about 25 ohms on and leaks picoamps off. It makes a nice
    signal switch or mux.

    It was an Ixys part but seems to be made now by someone else, so may
    not be a good choice for new designs. The basic idea, a
    current-limiting thermal-limiting SSR, is great.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From legg@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 11 11:00:39 2023
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 07:22:13 -0800, John Larkin <jl@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:

    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund >><klaus.kragelund@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127
    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.

    ISDN tfx for POE are a good example of what will or will not work.

    I had to test a bunch for temperature rise/Lp when passing
    POE current levels. The spec isn't often clear.

    For technique:

    - there are a lot of pulse width extension/termination
    methods that use the pulse transformer to pass info, not
    necessarily power.

    - Small transformers can also pass gate power at higher frequencies
    than the PWM fundamental. Pwm is conveyed through a modulation
    method.

    RL

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Sat Nov 11 15:05:15 2023
    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 20:23:02 UTC+1, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 1:27:19 PM UTC-5, john larkin wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:24:00 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote: >>
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it
    to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive >> a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.



    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with
    its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main
    FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main
    FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off.
    It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs
    Clever.

    Given a floating power supply, a dc/dc converter or equivalent, the
    small tranny can drive a gate driver chip. The tranny can also conduct tiny spikes at the leading and trailing edge of the pulse, and drive a highside flop or schmitt.

    In my youth, I invented the dual optocoupler totem pole fet gate
    driver. That needs a floating power supply, a dc/dc or a PV coupler or
    a bootstrap supply or something. Slow but nice.

    Nowadays a fast logic coupler can drive a fast gate driver chip.
    If the application is for a MOSFET analog switch, switching speed is not of the essence, duty is very low.
    It needs to switch fast, since transient loss might be very large, and exceed transient thermal resistance constraints

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Sat Nov 11 15:01:05 2023
    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 17:37:52 UTC+1, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 6:14:58 PM UTC-5, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?
    If you're looking for cheap, you can't beat capacitor coupling the gate drive. Phillips has a whole chapter in their MOSFET applications handbook on how to do this reliably-wasn't in the market for the technique at the time and skipped it.

    see page 36 AC-Coupled Gate-Drive Circuits

    https://www.ti.com/lit/ml/slua618a/slua618a.pdf


    I have done ac coupled gate drive before. Does not work well with 100% dutu cycle, and has some issues with transients on the rails, which coupled through drain-gate capacitance and into the driving circuits. But, great link anyway :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to John Larkin on Sat Nov 11 14:57:11 2023
    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the microcontroller first
    disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost, then the switch off
    loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout. At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to legg on Sat Nov 11 15:10:28 2023
    On Saturday, 11 November 2023 at 17:00:41 UTC+1, legg wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 07:22:13 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund >><klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127
    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.
    ISDN tfx for POE are a good example of what will or will not work.

    I had to test a bunch for temperature rise/Lp when passing
    POE current levels. The spec isn't often clear.

    For technique:

    - there are a lot of pulse width extension/termination
    methods that use the pulse transformer to pass info, not
    necessarily power.

    - Small transformers can also pass gate power at higher frequencies
    than the PWM fundamental. Pwm is conveyed through a modulation
    method.

    That was my first try:

    https://www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr_xfm_only.pdf

    It needed addition of a comparator to speed up the gatedrive and UVLO circuit to avoid brown-outs. The other link I posted is a lot easier to use.

    Could just grap one of those Digital icouplers with power supply. VERY expensive.

    https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/ADM3251E.pdf

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to Phil Hobbs on Sat Nov 11 15:04:00 2023
    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 17:24:08 UTC+1, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it >>> to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.


    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off. It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Sounds very interesting. Do you have a link to a schematics?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to John Larkin on Sat Nov 11 15:15:03 2023
    On Saturday, 11 November 2023 at 16:31:57 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 04:00:11 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 9:46:16?PM UTC-5, John Larkin wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:27:25 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 3:10:07?PM UTC-5, john larkin wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:22:55 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 1:27:19?PM UTC-5, john larkin wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:24:00 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
    <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it
    to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.



    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with
    its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main
    FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap. >> >> >> >
    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main
    FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off.
    It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs
    Clever.

    Given a floating power supply, a dc/dc converter or equivalent, the >> >> >> small tranny can drive a gate driver chip. The tranny can also conduct
    tiny spikes at the leading and trailing edge of the pulse, and drive a
    highside flop or schmitt.

    In my youth, I invented the dual optocoupler totem pole fet gate
    driver. That needs a floating power supply, a dc/dc or a PV coupler or
    a bootstrap supply or something. Slow but nice.

    Nowadays a fast logic coupler can drive a fast gate driver chip.

    If the application is for a MOSFET analog switch, switching speed is not of the essence, duty is very low.
    May as well buy an SSR.

    Sounds like it's not quite the same as a pulsed drive. The switch is turned on and stays on indefinitely etc...you can't do that with an ac pulsed drive.
    Some of the bidirectional LED-mosfet SSRs have zero offset, a few ohms
    Ron, and picoamp leakage. 1 mA drive is usually plenty.

    Switching times are in the ballpark of 1 ms.

    Most be using those PV gate drives... Conceptualizing the electronics is relatively simple, the hard part is armor plating it against the real world, the mains are really harsh. Then if the transient protection overreacts in the wrong way, you can
    trigger a trip on the smart circuit protection technology these days. Things like nuisance tripping, death by transient, smoke or other odd odors, are not good public relations.

    https://www.emc-directory.com/community/what-is-a-power-line-transient
    The CPC1540GS is claimed to be self-protecting, and it is to maybe 40
    volts. It's about 25 ohms on and leaks picoamps off. It makes a nice
    signal switch or mux.

    It was an Ixys part but seems to be made now by someone else, so may
    not be a good choice for new designs. The basic idea, a
    current-limiting thermal-limiting SSR, is great.

    Very nice part

    https://www.mouser.dk/datasheet/2/240/media-3320675.pdf

    But insane price, I can buy 10 Cortex M microcontrollers for that price, if that reference feels any good ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical. on Sat Nov 11 15:48:47 2023
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 23:39:57 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    Klaus Kragelund <klaus.kragelund@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 17:24:08 UTC+1, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote: >>>>
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it >>>>>> to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262


    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.


    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with >>> its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main >>> FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. ) >>>
    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main >>> FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off. >>> It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Sounds very interesting. Do you have a link to a schematics?


    I did it for a customer gig a couple of years ago, but they went away
    before it got built.
    (It was a large semiconductor equipment company.)

    Knowing the semi business in general, they probably stole the idea and
    did it themselves.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Hobbs@21:1/5 to Klaus Kragelund on Sat Nov 11 23:39:57 2023
    Klaus Kragelund <klaus.kragelund@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 17:24:08 UTC+1, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it >>>>> to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262


    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.


    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with >> its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main >> FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main >> FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off. >> It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Sounds very interesting. Do you have a link to a schematics?


    I did it for a customer gig a couple of years ago, but they went away
    before it got built.
    (It was a large semiconductor equipment company.)

    Sometimes folks paint themselves into a corner, and then look around for
    help. We’re fine with that as long as they stop painting while we get on with the job. ;)

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lasse Langwadt Christensen@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 11 15:52:16 2023
    søndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 00.40.06 UTC+1 skrev Phil Hobbs:
    Klaus Kragelund <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 17:24:08 UTC+1, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote: >>>
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it
    to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262


    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive >>> a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.


    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with
    its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main
    FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main
    FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off.
    It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Sounds very interesting. Do you have a link to a schematics?

    I did it for a customer gig a couple of years ago, but they went away
    before it got built.
    (It was a large semiconductor equipment company.)


    this one from the old "Philips Power semiconductor applications"

    https://imgur.com/a/E3DaFAO ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Hobbs@21:1/5 to Lasse Langwadt Christensen on Sat Nov 11 23:58:14 2023
    Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:
    søndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 00.40.06 UTC+1 skrev Phil Hobbs:
    Klaus Kragelund <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 17:24:08 UTC+1, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote: >>>>>
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it >>>>>>> to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262



    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive >>>>> a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.


    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with >>>> its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main >>>> FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main >>>> FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off. >>>> It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Sounds very interesting. Do you have a link to a schematics?

    I did it for a customer gig a couple of years ago, but they went away
    before it got built.
    (It was a large semiconductor equipment company.)


    this one from the old "Philips Power semiconductor applications"

    https://imgur.com/a/E3DaFAO ?




    Pretty much. I was fairly sure that I wasn’t the first one to do it, but it was new to me.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to klaus.kragelund@gmail.com on Sat Nov 11 16:01:47 2023
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.kragelund@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the microcontroller first
    disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost, then the switch off
    loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W

    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Then use my should-be-famous totem-pole optocoupler, which has zero
    static supply current.

    Why two fets? Change the heater and run half-wave.

    How about an opto-triac? The whole thing becomes two parts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From whit3rd@21:1/5 to john larkin on Sat Nov 11 22:53:16 2023
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 12:09:11 PM UTC-8, john larkin wrote:

    Eventually most every clever circuit design gets pre-empted by some
    cheap nasty little IC.

    Not really; clever design often means multiple parts, and multipart designs
    do get integrated... thus when circuits are clever multipart designs, and get integrated, that creates, by definition, an IC.

    The cheap and nasty characterizations can be painted over anything.
    Your socks, for instance.

    So we need to keep inventing ever-goofier circuits. I can do that.

    Thus:
    <https://rockemsocks.com/products/goofy-split-face>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From piglet@21:1/5 to Klaus Kragelund on Sun Nov 12 10:55:37 2023
    On 11/11/2023 11:05 pm, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 20:23:02 UTC+1, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 1:27:19 PM UTC-5, john larkin wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:24:00 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
    <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote: >>>>>
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it >>>>>>> to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive >>>>> a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.



    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with >>>> its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main >>>> FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main >>>> FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off. >>>> It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs
    Clever.

    Given a floating power supply, a dc/dc converter or equivalent, the
    small tranny can drive a gate driver chip. The tranny can also conduct
    tiny spikes at the leading and trailing edge of the pulse, and drive a
    highside flop or schmitt.

    In my youth, I invented the dual optocoupler totem pole fet gate
    driver. That needs a floating power supply, a dc/dc or a PV coupler or
    a bootstrap supply or something. Slow but nice.

    Nowadays a fast logic coupler can drive a fast gate driver chip.
    If the application is for a MOSFET analog switch, switching speed is not of the essence, duty is very low.
    It needs to switch fast, since transient loss might be very large, and exceed transient thermal resistance constraints

    Why do you need to switch a heater fast? Those are fancy fets just for
    heater switching, triacs make better use of silicon?

    piglet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to John Larkin on Sun Nov 12 03:18:27 2023
    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the microcontroller first
    disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost, then the switch
    off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Then use my should-be-famous totem-pole optocoupler, which has zero
    static supply current.

    Why two fets? Change the heater and run half-wave.

    How about an opto-triac? The whole thing becomes two parts.

    Opto triac was how we started. But that has a nasty turn off and on at the zero crossing due to the holding current and diac trigger voltage, and that pops up as differential noise in the conducted emission measurements. 20dB over the limits. So I made a
    triac design that turned it on during all the time, that solved the emission problem.

    But a funny spurious triggering has popped up, we are solving that, but will populate the PCB with the MOSFET solution as a backup solution

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to Lasse Langwadt Christensen on Sun Nov 12 03:15:37 2023
    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 00:52:21 UTC+1, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
    søndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 00.40.06 UTC+1 skrev Phil Hobbs:
    Klaus Kragelund <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 17:24:08 UTC+1, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it
    to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262


    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look
    good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive >>> a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.


    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with
    its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main
    FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main
    FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off.
    It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Sounds very interesting. Do you have a link to a schematics?

    I did it for a customer gig a couple of years ago, but they went away before it got built.
    (It was a large semiconductor equipment company.)

    this one from the old "Philips Power semiconductor applications"

    https://imgur.com/a/E3DaFAO ?

    Great find ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to piglet on Sun Nov 12 03:19:24 2023
    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 11:55:48 UTC+1, piglet wrote:
    On 11/11/2023 11:05 pm, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 20:23:02 UTC+1, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 1:27:19 PM UTC-5, john larkin wrote: >>> On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:24:00 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
    <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it
    to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look >>>>> good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive >>>>> a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.



    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with
    its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main
    FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main
    FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off.
    It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs
    Clever.

    Given a floating power supply, a dc/dc converter or equivalent, the
    small tranny can drive a gate driver chip. The tranny can also conduct >>> tiny spikes at the leading and trailing edge of the pulse, and drive a >>> highside flop or schmitt.

    In my youth, I invented the dual optocoupler totem pole fet gate
    driver. That needs a floating power supply, a dc/dc or a PV coupler or >>> a bootstrap supply or something. Slow but nice.

    Nowadays a fast logic coupler can drive a fast gate driver chip.
    If the application is for a MOSFET analog switch, switching speed is not of the essence, duty is very low.
    It needs to switch fast, since transient loss might be very large, and exceed transient thermal resistance constraints
    Why do you need to switch a heater fast? Those are fancy fets just for heater switching, triacs make better use of silicon?

    Due to the switching loss of the FET. I am looking into heavy snubber to avoid that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to John Larkin on Sun Nov 12 03:29:02 2023
    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the microcontroller first
    disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost, then the switch
    off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From piglet@21:1/5 to Klaus Kragelund on Sun Nov 12 12:08:22 2023
    On 12/11/2023 11:19 am, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 11:55:48 UTC+1, piglet wrote:
    On 11/11/2023 11:05 pm, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 20:23:02 UTC+1, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 1:27:19 PM UTC-5, john larkin wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:24:00 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
    <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote: >>>>>>>
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it
    to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look >>>>>>> good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive >>>>>>> a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.



    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with
    its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main
    FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap.

    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main
    FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off.
    It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs
    Clever.

    Given a floating power supply, a dc/dc converter or equivalent, the
    small tranny can drive a gate driver chip. The tranny can also conduct >>>>> tiny spikes at the leading and trailing edge of the pulse, and drive a >>>>> highside flop or schmitt.

    In my youth, I invented the dual optocoupler totem pole fet gate
    driver. That needs a floating power supply, a dc/dc or a PV coupler or >>>>> a bootstrap supply or something. Slow but nice.

    Nowadays a fast logic coupler can drive a fast gate driver chip.
    If the application is for a MOSFET analog switch, switching speed is not of the essence, duty is very low.
    It needs to switch fast, since transient loss might be very large, and exceed transient thermal resistance constraints
    Why do you need to switch a heater fast? Those are fancy fets just for
    heater switching, triacs make better use of silicon?

    Due to the switching loss of the FET. I am looking into heavy snubber to avoid that.

    Surprised you find it worthwhile, I estimate you'll see 2.2W in the two
    FETs versus 2.9W in a triac - which costs less and frees up PCB area you
    could use instead for heatsinking?

    piglet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to John Larkin on Sun Nov 12 03:20:52 2023
    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the microcontroller first
    disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost, then the switch
    off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.


    Yes, could be an good idea. Will try that

    Then use my should-be-famous totem-pole optocoupler, which has zero
    static supply current.

    Will look it up...

    Why two fets? Change the heater and run half-wave.


    We need full power, so can't do that.

    How about an opto-triac? The whole thing becomes two parts.

    That was what we did in earlier design

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to piglet on Sun Nov 12 04:42:10 2023
    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 13:08:31 UTC+1, piglet wrote:
    On 12/11/2023 11:19 am, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 11:55:48 UTC+1, piglet wrote:
    On 11/11/2023 11:05 pm, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 20:23:02 UTC+1, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Friday, November 10, 2023 at 1:27:19 PM UTC-5, john larkin wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:24:00 -0000 (UTC), Phil Hobbs
    <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:

    John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:28:15 -0500, legg <le...@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it
    to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand. >>>>>>>>>
    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus

    Suggest you nail down your requirements first:
    Lpmin
    Vtmin,
    Rdcmax,
    Isolation class,
    prod test level.

    Many techniques avoid the requirement of high Lp and Vt.

    Be smart or pay.

    RL

    Volt-second saturation will exclude small parts that othewise look >>>>>>> good. Ditto leakage inductance.

    Winding capacitance, too. There are cases where I would love to drive
    a fet through a transformer, but nothing reasonable works.



    There’s the common-gate FET trick, where you use a small extra FET, with
    its source connected to the transformer and its gate and drain to the main
    FET’s source and gate, respectively, with a small storage cap. >>>>>>
    (The other end of the transformer goes to the main FET’s source as usual. )

    Using NFETs, a positive edge conducts via the body diode, turning the main
    FET on, and a negative one conducts via transistor action, turning it off.
    It doesn’t matter much what happens in between.

    Really stretches out the ol’ voltseconds.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs
    Clever.

    Given a floating power supply, a dc/dc converter or equivalent, the >>>>> small tranny can drive a gate driver chip. The tranny can also conduct >>>>> tiny spikes at the leading and trailing edge of the pulse, and drive a >>>>> highside flop or schmitt.

    In my youth, I invented the dual optocoupler totem pole fet gate
    driver. That needs a floating power supply, a dc/dc or a PV coupler or >>>>> a bootstrap supply or something. Slow but nice.

    Nowadays a fast logic coupler can drive a fast gate driver chip.
    If the application is for a MOSFET analog switch, switching speed is not of the essence, duty is very low.
    It needs to switch fast, since transient loss might be very large, and exceed transient thermal resistance constraints
    Why do you need to switch a heater fast? Those are fancy fets just for
    heater switching, triacs make better use of silicon?

    Due to the switching loss of the FET. I am looking into heavy snubber to avoid that.
    Surprised you find it worthwhile, I estimate you'll see 2.2W in the two
    FETs versus 2.9W in a triac - which costs less and frees up PCB area you could use instead for heatsinking?

    Yes, it's only a backup solution if the current solution with the triac misbehaves. Triac costs 1 USD, FETs 5 USD combined. At lower power levels it switches, so FETs are cheaper than triac. Advantage of FETs are also no spurious turn on and other funny
    4th quadrant switching problems.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to klaus.kragelund@gmail.com on Sun Nov 12 07:44:41 2023
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.kragelund@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the microcontroller first
    disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost, then the switch
    off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 12 09:14:53 2023
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <jl@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund ><klaus.kragelund@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the microcontroller first
    disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost, then the switch
    off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.



    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lasse Langwadt Christensen@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 12 11:00:03 2023
    søndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund ><klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the microcontroller first
    disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost, then the
    switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply >>> from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power >>> LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Version 4
    SHEET 1 960 800
    WIRE 64 -112 -64 -112
    WIRE 272 -112 144 -112
    WIRE 688 -112 272 -112
    WIRE 272 -64 272 -112
    WIRE -64 0 -64 -112
    WIRE 688 64 688 -112
    WIRE 272 96 272 16
    WIRE -64 112 -64 64
    WIRE -64 112 -160 112
    WIRE 80 112 -64 112
    WIRE -160 144 -160 112
    WIRE -64 144 -64 112
    WIRE 224 176 144 176
    WIRE -64 208 -160 208
    WIRE 176 208 -64 208
    WIRE 272 208 272 192
    WIRE 272 208 176 208
    WIRE 272 224 272 208
    WIRE 224 240 224 176
    WIRE 272 384 272 320
    WIRE 688 384 688 144
    WIRE 688 384 272 384
    WIRE -144 432 -560 432
    WIRE 80 432 80 112
    WIRE 80 432 48 432
    WIRE 80 496 48 496
    WIRE -304 528 -336 528
    WIRE -144 528 -224 528
    WIRE 80 576 80 496
    WIRE 144 576 144 176
    WIRE 144 576 80 576
    WIRE -336 624 -336 528
    WIRE -336 624 -416 624
    WIRE -304 624 -336 624
    WIRE -144 624 -224 624
    WIRE 80 624 80 576
    WIRE 80 624 48 624
    WIRE -560 640 -560 432
    WIRE -416 640 -416 624
    WIRE 176 688 176 208
    WIRE 176 688 48 688
    WIRE -416 720 -560 720
    WIRE -144 720 -416 720
    FLAG -560 720 0
    FLAG -64 208 0
    SYMBOL nmos 224 96 R0
    SYMATTR InstName M1
    SYMATTR Value R6020PNJ
    SYMBOL nmos 224 320 M180
    SYMATTR InstName M2
    SYMATTR Value R6020PNJ
    SYMBOL res 256 -80 R0
    SYMATTR InstName R1
    SYMATTR Value 70
    SYMBOL voltage 688 48 R0
    WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
    WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0
    SYMATTR InstName V1
    SYMATTR Value SINE(0 325 50 0 0 0)
    SYMBOL diode -80 0 R0
    SYMATTR InstName D1
    SYMATTR Value MUR460
    SYMBOL zener -144 208 R180
    WINDOW 0 24 64 Left 2
    WINDOW 3 24 0 Left 2
    SYMATTR InstName D2
    SYMATTR Value BZX84C10L
    SYMATTR Description Diode
    SYMATTR Type diode
    SYMBOL res 160 -128 R90
    WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 2
    WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 2
    SYMATTR InstName R2
    SYMATTR Value 500k
    SYMBOL cap -80 144 R0
    SYMATTR InstName C1
    SYMATTR Value 100n
    SYMBOL Optos\\4N25 -48 496 R0
    SYMATTR InstName U1
    SYMBOL Optos\\4N25 -48 688 R0
    SYMATTR InstName U2
    SYMBOL voltage -560 624 R0
    WINDOW 3 -65 60 Left 2
    WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
    WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0
    SYMATTR InstName V2
    SYMATTR Value 2
    SYMBOL voltage -416 624 R0
    WINDOW 3 -74 146 Left 2
    WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
    WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0
    SYMATTR InstName V3
    SYMATTR Value PULSE(2 0 .1 1u 1u .1205 .3457)
    SYMBOL res -208 512 R90
    WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 2
    WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 2
    SYMATTR InstName R3
    SYMATTR Value 100
    SYMBOL res -208 608 R90
    WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 2
    WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 2
    SYMATTR InstName R4
    SYMATTR Value 100
    TEXT -326 -184 Left 2 !.tran 2

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to langwadt@fonz.dk on Sun Nov 12 11:55:40 2023
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:

    søndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the microcontroller first
    disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost, then the
    switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply >> >>> from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power >> >>> LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget.






    Version 4
    SHEET 1 960 800
    WIRE 64 -112 -64 -112
    WIRE 272 -112 144 -112
    WIRE 688 -112 272 -112
    WIRE 272 -64 272 -112
    WIRE -64 0 -64 -112
    WIRE 688 64 688 -112
    WIRE 272 96 272 16
    WIRE -64 112 -64 64
    WIRE -64 112 -160 112
    WIRE 80 112 -64 112
    WIRE -160 144 -160 112
    WIRE -64 144 -64 112
    WIRE 224 176 144 176
    WIRE -64 208 -160 208
    WIRE 176 208 -64 208
    WIRE 272 208 272 192
    WIRE 272 208 176 208
    WIRE 272 224 272 208
    WIRE 224 240 224 176
    WIRE 272 384 272 320
    WIRE 688 384 688 144
    WIRE 688 384 272 384
    WIRE -144 432 -560 432
    WIRE 80 432 80 112
    WIRE 80 432 48 432
    WIRE 80 496 48 496
    WIRE -304 528 -336 528
    WIRE -144 528 -224 528
    WIRE 80 576 80 496
    WIRE 144 576 144 176
    WIRE 144 576 80 576
    WIRE -336 624 -336 528
    WIRE -336 624 -416 624
    WIRE -304 624 -336 624
    WIRE -144 624 -224 624
    WIRE 80 624 80 576
    WIRE 80 624 48 624
    WIRE -560 640 -560 432
    WIRE -416 640 -416 624
    WIRE 176 688 176 208
    WIRE 176 688 48 688
    WIRE -416 720 -560 720
    WIRE -144 720 -416 720
    FLAG -560 720 0
    FLAG -64 208 0
    SYMBOL nmos 224 96 R0
    SYMATTR InstName M1
    SYMATTR Value R6020PNJ
    SYMBOL nmos 224 320 M180
    SYMATTR InstName M2
    SYMATTR Value R6020PNJ
    SYMBOL res 256 -80 R0
    SYMATTR InstName R1
    SYMATTR Value 70
    SYMBOL voltage 688 48 R0
    WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
    WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0
    SYMATTR InstName V1
    SYMATTR Value SINE(0 325 50 0 0 0)
    SYMBOL diode -80 0 R0
    SYMATTR InstName D1
    SYMATTR Value MUR460
    SYMBOL zener -144 208 R180
    WINDOW 0 24 64 Left 2
    WINDOW 3 24 0 Left 2
    SYMATTR InstName D2
    SYMATTR Value BZX84C10L
    SYMATTR Description Diode
    SYMATTR Type diode
    SYMBOL res 160 -128 R90
    WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 2
    WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 2
    SYMATTR InstName R2
    SYMATTR Value 500k
    SYMBOL cap -80 144 R0
    SYMATTR InstName C1
    SYMATTR Value 100n
    SYMBOL Optos\\4N25 -48 496 R0
    SYMATTR InstName U1
    SYMBOL Optos\\4N25 -48 688 R0
    SYMATTR InstName U2
    SYMBOL voltage -560 624 R0
    WINDOW 3 -65 60 Left 2
    WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
    WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0
    SYMATTR InstName V2
    SYMATTR Value 2
    SYMBOL voltage -416 624 R0
    WINDOW 3 -74 146 Left 2
    WINDOW 123 0 0 Left 0
    WINDOW 39 0 0 Left 0
    SYMATTR InstName V3
    SYMATTR Value PULSE(2 0 .1 1u 1u .1205 .3457)
    SYMBOL res -208 512 R90
    WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 2
    WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 2
    SYMATTR InstName R3
    SYMATTR Value 100
    SYMBOL res -208 608 R90
    WINDOW 0 0 56 VBottom 2
    WINDOW 3 32 56 VTop 2
    SYMATTR InstName R4
    SYMATTR Value 100
    TEXT -326 -184 Left 2 !.tran 2



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 12 12:58:34 2023
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <jl@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen ><langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:

    søndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the microcontroller
    first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost, then the
    switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply >>> >>> from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power >>> >>> LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget.



    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off.
    It may need another resistor.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lasse Langwadt Christensen@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 12 13:53:18 2023
    søndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 21.59.15 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen ><lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    sřndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> >>> wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote: >>> >>> >> On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the microcontroller
    first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost, then the
    switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us.. >>> >>> >Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget.


    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off.
    It may need another resistor.

    it should work, either way is a bit weird to look at in simulation if you don't make the fet sources the ground

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to langwadt@fonz.dk on Sun Nov 12 15:31:47 2023
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 13:53:18 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:

    søndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 21.59.15 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote: >> >>> >>> >> On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the microcontroller
    first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost, then the
    switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget.


    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off.
    It may need another resistor.

    it should work, either way is a bit weird to look at in simulation if you don't make the fet sources the ground

    The source-source node basically floats when both fets are off...
    battling substrate diodes. So the power supply to the totem-pole opto
    could fail.

    Fixing this could run the total cost up to 18 cents.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lasse Langwadt Christensen@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 12 15:54:43 2023
    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 00.32.30 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 13:53:18 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    søndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 21.59.15 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> >> >>> wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote: >> >>> >>> On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the microcontroller
    first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost, then
    the switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us.. >> >>> >>> >Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so >> >>> >the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would >> >>> >work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget.


    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off.
    It may need another resistor.

    it should work, either way is a bit weird to look at in simulation if you don't make the fet sources the ground
    The source-source node basically floats when both fets are off...
    battling substrate diodes. So the power supply to the totem-pole opto
    could fail.

    how? C1 gets charged via D1 and Q2s body diode

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to langwadt@fonz.dk on Sun Nov 12 16:50:58 2023
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:54:43 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:

    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 00.32.30 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 13:53:18 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    søndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 21.59.15 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> >> >> >>> wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote: >> >> >>> >>> On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the
    microcontroller first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost, then
    the switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us.. >> >> >>> >>> >Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so >> >> >>> >the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would >> >> >>> >work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget.


    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off.
    It may need another resistor.

    it should work, either way is a bit weird to look at in simulation if you don't make the fet sources the ground
    The source-source node basically floats when both fets are off...
    battling substrate diodes. So the power supply to the totem-pole opto
    could fail.

    how? C1 gets charged via D1 and Q2s body diode

    Yeah, OK, I guess it does work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to Klaus Kragelund on Sun Nov 12 17:52:25 2023
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 02:37:13 UTC+1, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 01:51:39 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:54:43 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 00.32.30 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 13:53:18 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    sřndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 21.59.15 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin: >> >> >>> On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund >> >> >>> >>> >> <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the
    microcontroller first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost,
    then the switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor. >> >> >>> >
    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget. >> >> >

    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off.
    It may need another resistor.

    it should work, either way is a bit weird to look at in simulation if you don't make the fet sources the ground
    The source-source node basically floats when both fets are off...
    battling substrate diodes. So the power supply to the totem-pole opto >> could fail.

    how? C1 gets charged via D1 and Q2s body diode
    Yeah, OK, I guess it does work.
    Very nice solution, and a lot more clean than the transformer one I have been working on.

    Only worry is noise coupling into the gates, from transients. But that can be remedied by adding a capacitance to the gates of Q1 and Q2. Will slow switching times a little, but more robust.
    I just simulated Lasses solution. C1 needs to be 1uF due to charge transfer, otherwise the switching losses are too high

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to John Larkin on Sun Nov 12 17:37:08 2023
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 01:51:39 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:54:43 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 00.32.30 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 13:53:18 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    sřndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 21.59.15 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com> >> >> wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen >> >> ><lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin: >> >> >>> On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand. >> >> >>> >>> >> >
    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the
    microcontroller first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost,
    then the switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear. >> >> >>> >After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents. >> >> >>
    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget. >> >> >

    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off. >> >> It may need another resistor.

    it should work, either way is a bit weird to look at in simulation if you don't make the fet sources the ground
    The source-source node basically floats when both fets are off...
    battling substrate diodes. So the power supply to the totem-pole opto
    could fail.

    how? C1 gets charged via D1 and Q2s body diode
    Yeah, OK, I guess it does work.
    Very nice solution, and a lot more clean than the transformer one I have been working on.

    Only worry is noise coupling into the gates, from transients. But that can be remedied by adding a capacitance to the gates of Q1 and Q2. Will slow switching times a little, but more robust.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to klaus.kragelund@gmail.com on Sun Nov 12 20:48:35 2023
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 17:52:25 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.kragelund@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 02:37:13 UTC+1, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 01:51:39 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:54:43 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 00.32.30 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 13:53:18 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 21.59.15 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin: >> > >> >> >>> On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the
    microcontroller first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost,
    then the switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor. >> > >> >> >>> >
    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget. >> > >> >> >

    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off.
    It may need another resistor.

    it should work, either way is a bit weird to look at in simulation if you don't make the fet sources the ground
    The source-source node basically floats when both fets are off...
    battling substrate diodes. So the power supply to the totem-pole opto >> > >> could fail.

    how? C1 gets charged via D1 and Q2s body diode
    Yeah, OK, I guess it does work.
    Very nice solution, and a lot more clean than the transformer one I have been working on.

    Only worry is noise coupling into the gates, from transients. But that can be remedied by adding a capacitance to the gates of Q1 and Q2. Will slow switching times a little, but more robust.
    I just simulated Lasses solution. C1 needs to be 1uF due to charge transfer, otherwise the switching losses are too high

    What sort of switching rates do you need? Entire cycles at 50 Hz? Fast
    PWM? The triac solution wouldn't switch fast, and a heater shouldn't
    need a lot of switching.

    You can vary the led drive, and the coupler CTRs, to control mosfet
    edge rates. I think EMI was an issue for you so you may not want fast
    edges.

    To go faster, add a couple of transistors to drive the gate
    capacitance harder. One PNP, one NPN, one cent each.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arie de Muijnck@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Mon Nov 13 12:55:37 2023
    On 2023-11-10 17:37, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    Looks like the internet lost the Philips handbook...
    This one? https://assets.nexperia.com/documents/user-manual/Nexperia_document_book_MOSFETGaNFETApplicationHandbook_2020.pdf

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lasse Langwadt Christensen@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 13 04:43:53 2023
    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 12.55.53 UTC+1 skrev Arie de Muijnck:
    On 2023-11-10 17:37, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    Looks like the internet lost the Philips handbook...
    This one? https://assets.nexperia.com/documents/user-manual/Nexperia_document_book_MOSFETGaNFETApplicationHandbook_2020.pdf

    http://jfsimon.net/public/Power_Semiconductor_Applications_Philips.pdf ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Smiht@21:1/5 to Lasse Langwadt Christensen on Mon Nov 13 08:44:15 2023
    On Monday, November 13, 2023 at 6:43:58 AM UTC-6, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 12.55.53 UTC+1 skrev Arie de Muijnck:
    On 2023-11-10 17:37, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    Looks like the internet lost the Philips handbook...
    This one? https://assets.nexperia.com/documents/user-manual/Nexperia_document_book_MOSFETGaNFETApplicationHandbook_2020.pdf
    http://jfsimon.net/public/Power_Semiconductor_Applications_Philips.pdf ?


    Good link. Thanks, Lasse.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lasse Langwadt Christensen@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 13 09:10:07 2023
    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 05.49.19 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 17:52:25 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 02:37:13 UTC+1, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 01:51:39 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:54:43 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 00.32.30 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 13:53:18 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen >> > >> <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 21.59.15 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin: >> > >> >> On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund >> > >> >> >>> >>> <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar. >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> >
    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the
    microcontroller first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost,
    then the switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget.


    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off.
    It may need another resistor.

    it should work, either way is a bit weird to look at in simulation if you don't make the fet sources the ground
    The source-source node basically floats when both fets are off...
    battling substrate diodes. So the power supply to the totem-pole opto
    could fail.

    how? C1 gets charged via D1 and Q2s body diode
    Yeah, OK, I guess it does work.
    Very nice solution, and a lot more clean than the transformer one I have been working on.

    Only worry is noise coupling into the gates, from transients. But that can be remedied by adding a capacitance to the gates of Q1 and Q2. Will slow switching times a little, but more robust.
    I just simulated Lasses solution. C1 needs to be 1uF due to charge transfer, otherwise the switching losses are too high
    What sort of switching rates do you need? Entire cycles at 50 Hz? Fast
    PWM? The triac solution wouldn't switch fast, and a heater shouldn't
    need a lot of switching.

    I assume Klaus did the calculations and concluded that a slow turnon/turnoff at the wrong time would
    exceed the maximum allowable peak dissipation in the FETs


    You can vary the led drive, and the coupler CTRs, to control mosfet
    edge rates. I think EMI was an issue for you so you may not want fast
    edges.

    To go faster, add a couple of transistors to drive the gate
    capacitance harder. One PNP, one NPN, one cent each.

    or splurge and spend 30 cent and get a real gatedriver and optocoupler in one, like for example TLP155

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin@21:1/5 to langwadt@fonz.dk on Mon Nov 13 13:59:25 2023
    On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 09:10:07 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen <langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:

    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 05.49.19 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 17:52:25 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 02:37:13 UTC+1, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 01:51:39 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:54:43 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 00.32.30 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 13:53:18 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen >> >> > >> <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 21.59.15 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin: >> >> > >> >> On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund >> >> > >> >> >>> >>> <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar. >> >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> >
    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the
    microcontroller first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost,
    then the switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget.


    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off.
    It may need another resistor.

    it should work, either way is a bit weird to look at in simulation if you don't make the fet sources the ground
    The source-source node basically floats when both fets are off...
    battling substrate diodes. So the power supply to the totem-pole opto
    could fail.

    how? C1 gets charged via D1 and Q2s body diode
    Yeah, OK, I guess it does work.
    Very nice solution, and a lot more clean than the transformer one I have been working on.

    Only worry is noise coupling into the gates, from transients. But that can be remedied by adding a capacitance to the gates of Q1 and Q2. Will slow switching times a little, but more robust.
    I just simulated Lasses solution. C1 needs to be 1uF due to charge transfer, otherwise the switching losses are too high
    What sort of switching rates do you need? Entire cycles at 50 Hz? Fast
    PWM? The triac solution wouldn't switch fast, and a heater shouldn't
    need a lot of switching.

    I assume Klaus did the calculations and concluded that a slow turnon/turnoff at the wrong time would
    exceed the maximum allowable peak dissipation in the FETs


    You can vary the led drive, and the coupler CTRs, to control mosfet
    edge rates. I think EMI was an issue for you so you may not want fast
    edges.

    To go faster, add a couple of transistors to drive the gate
    capacitance harder. One PNP, one NPN, one cent each.

    or splurge and spend 30 cent and get a real gatedriver and optocoupler in one, like for example TLP155

    It needs a floating power supply.

    I think there are gate drivers with isolated power too, TI maybe.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lasse Langwadt Christensen@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 13 14:35:24 2023
    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 22.59.42 UTC+1 skrev john larkin:
    On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 09:10:07 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 05.49.19 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 17:52:25 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 02:37:13 UTC+1, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 01:51:39 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:54:43 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen >> >> > <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 00.32.30 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin: >> >> > >> On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 13:53:18 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 21.59.15 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund >> >> > >> >> >>> ><klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the
    microcontroller first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is
    lost, then the switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget.


    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off.
    It may need another resistor.

    it should work, either way is a bit weird to look at in simulation if you don't make the fet sources the ground
    The source-source node basically floats when both fets are off... >> >> > >> battling substrate diodes. So the power supply to the totem-pole opto
    could fail.

    how? C1 gets charged via D1 and Q2s body diode
    Yeah, OK, I guess it does work.
    Very nice solution, and a lot more clean than the transformer one I have been working on.

    Only worry is noise coupling into the gates, from transients. But that can be remedied by adding a capacitance to the gates of Q1 and Q2. Will slow switching times a little, but more robust.
    I just simulated Lasses solution. C1 needs to be 1uF due to charge transfer, otherwise the switching losses are too high
    What sort of switching rates do you need? Entire cycles at 50 Hz? Fast
    PWM? The triac solution wouldn't switch fast, and a heater shouldn't
    need a lot of switching.

    I assume Klaus did the calculations and concluded that a slow turnon/turnoff at the wrong time would
    exceed the maximum allowable peak dissipation in the FETs


    You can vary the led drive, and the coupler CTRs, to control mosfet
    edge rates. I think EMI was an issue for you so you may not want fast
    edges.

    To go faster, add a couple of transistors to drive the gate
    capacitance harder. One PNP, one NPN, one cent each.

    or splurge and spend 30 cent and get a real gatedriver and optocoupler in one, like for example TLP155
    It needs a floating power supply.

    sure, it only replaces the dual opto with something with a more "beefy" drive

    I think there are gate drivers with isolated power too, TI maybe.

    analog too, but afaict they something like 20x the price of one without isolated power

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin@21:1/5 to bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com on Mon Nov 13 14:51:29 2023
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:37:45 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 6:14:58?PM UTC-5, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    If you're looking for cheap, you can't beat capacitor coupling the gate drive. Phillips has a whole chapter in their MOSFET applications handbook on how to do this reliably-wasn't in the market for the technique at the time and skipped it.
    \

    One problem is achieving safe isolation from the 230 VAC power lines.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to John Larkin on Mon Nov 13 15:29:43 2023
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 05:49:19 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 17:52:25 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 02:37:13 UTC+1, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 01:51:39 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:54:43 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 00.32.30 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 13:53:18 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen >> > >> <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 21.59.15 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin: >> > >> >> On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund >> > >> >> >>> >>> <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar. >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> >
    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the
    microcontroller first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost,
    then the switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget.


    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off.
    It may need another resistor.

    it should work, either way is a bit weird to look at in simulation if you don't make the fet sources the ground
    The source-source node basically floats when both fets are off...
    battling substrate diodes. So the power supply to the totem-pole opto
    could fail.

    how? C1 gets charged via D1 and Q2s body diode
    Yeah, OK, I guess it does work.
    Very nice solution, and a lot more clean than the transformer one I have been working on.

    Only worry is noise coupling into the gates, from transients. But that can be remedied by adding a capacitance to the gates of Q1 and Q2. Will slow switching times a little, but more robust.
    I just simulated Lasses solution. C1 needs to be 1uF due to charge transfer, otherwise the switching losses are too high
    What sort of switching rates do you need? Entire cycles at 50 Hz? Fast
    PWM? The triac solution wouldn't switch fast, and a heater shouldn't
    need a lot of switching.

    Entire cycle, to reduce EMI. It will use something like 1s on, and 1s off, at least many periods between turn on and off.

    The edge rate is not that critical, it controls the envelope fall rate, which is at a very high frequency. At 50Hz (1Hz in case of 50cycles on/off), the emission is the same.
    What matters for the MOSFET case is transient dissipation, since that can easily result in very high transient temperature.

    You can vary the led drive, and the coupler CTRs, to control mosfet
    edge rates. I think EMI was an issue for you so you may not want fast
    edges.
    The problem we had was with Triac control, in which they used diac to control the gate, so it would have a nasty transient every 10ms, which resulted in large EMI-


    To go faster, add a couple of transistors to drive the gate
    capacitance harder. One PNP, one NPN, one cent each.
    I have tried that, still not good enough. I will try to add a schmitt trigger to clean the signal up, so I can push a lot of current into the gates for fast switching and low loss.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to Lasse Langwadt Christensen on Mon Nov 13 15:35:38 2023
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 23:35:30 UTC+1, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 22.59.42 UTC+1 skrev john larkin:
    On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 09:10:07 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 05.49.19 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 17:52:25 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 02:37:13 UTC+1, Klaus Kragelund wrote: >> >> On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 01:51:39 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:54:43 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 00.32.30 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 13:53:18 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 21.59.15 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the
    microcontroller first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is
    lost, then the switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget.


    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off.
    It may need another resistor.

    it should work, either way is a bit weird to look at in simulation if you don't make the fet sources the ground
    The source-source node basically floats when both fets are off...
    battling substrate diodes. So the power supply to the totem-pole opto
    could fail.

    how? C1 gets charged via D1 and Q2s body diode
    Yeah, OK, I guess it does work.
    Very nice solution, and a lot more clean than the transformer one I have been working on.

    Only worry is noise coupling into the gates, from transients. But that can be remedied by adding a capacitance to the gates of Q1 and Q2. Will slow switching times a little, but more robust.
    I just simulated Lasses solution. C1 needs to be 1uF due to charge transfer, otherwise the switching losses are too high
    What sort of switching rates do you need? Entire cycles at 50 Hz? Fast >> PWM? The triac solution wouldn't switch fast, and a heater shouldn't
    need a lot of switching.

    I assume Klaus did the calculations and concluded that a slow turnon/turnoff at the wrong time would
    exceed the maximum allowable peak dissipation in the FETs


    You can vary the led drive, and the coupler CTRs, to control mosfet
    edge rates. I think EMI was an issue for you so you may not want fast >> edges.

    To go faster, add a couple of transistors to drive the gate
    capacitance harder. One PNP, one NPN, one cent each.

    or splurge and spend 30 cent and get a real gatedriver and optocoupler in one, like for example TLP155
    It needs a floating power supply.
    sure, it only replaces the dual opto with something with a more "beefy" drive
    I think there are gate drivers with isolated power too, TI maybe.
    analog too, but afaict they something like 20x the price of one without isolated power

    Yes, been down that road.

    https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/ADuM6132.pdf

    It's actually not that expensive, like 3 USD.

    Then you get snappy switching, UVLO protection and power in one package. But kind of boring to design with that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to john larkin on Mon Nov 13 15:39:28 2023
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 23:51:46 UTC+1, john larkin wrote:
    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:37:45 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 6:14:58?PM UTC-5, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    If you're looking for cheap, you can't beat capacitor coupling the gate drive. Phillips has a whole chapter in their MOSFET applications handbook on how to do this reliably-wasn't in the market for the technique at the time and skipped it.
    \

    One problem is achieving safe isolation from the 230 VAC power lines.
    You can use Y caps, then you just need to keep the capacitance below 1nF.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john larkin@21:1/5 to klaus.kragelund@gmail.com on Mon Nov 13 15:41:19 2023
    On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 15:29:43 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.kragelund@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 05:49:19 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 17:52:25 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 02:37:13 UTC+1, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 01:51:39 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:54:43 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 00.32.30 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 13:53:18 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen >> >> > >> <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 21.59.15 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin: >> >> > >> >> On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund >> >> > >> >> >>> >>> <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar. >> >> > >> >> >>> >>> >> >
    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the
    microcontroller first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is lost,
    then the switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget.


    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off.
    It may need another resistor.

    it should work, either way is a bit weird to look at in simulation if you don't make the fet sources the ground
    The source-source node basically floats when both fets are off...
    battling substrate diodes. So the power supply to the totem-pole opto
    could fail.

    how? C1 gets charged via D1 and Q2s body diode
    Yeah, OK, I guess it does work.
    Very nice solution, and a lot more clean than the transformer one I have been working on.

    Only worry is noise coupling into the gates, from transients. But that can be remedied by adding a capacitance to the gates of Q1 and Q2. Will slow switching times a little, but more robust.
    I just simulated Lasses solution. C1 needs to be 1uF due to charge transfer, otherwise the switching losses are too high
    What sort of switching rates do you need? Entire cycles at 50 Hz? Fast
    PWM? The triac solution wouldn't switch fast, and a heater shouldn't
    need a lot of switching.

    Entire cycle, to reduce EMI. It will use something like 1s on, and 1s off, at least many periods between turn on and off.

    The edge rate is not that critical, it controls the envelope fall rate, which is at a very high frequency. At 50Hz (1Hz in case of 50cycles on/off), the emission is the same.
    What matters for the MOSFET case is transient dissipation, since that can easily result in very high transient temperature.

    Check the SOAR curves. A mosfet can dissipate a lot of power for a
    millisecond.

    Zero-cross switching solves the dynamic dissipation problem.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to Lasse Langwadt Christensen on Mon Nov 13 16:05:05 2023
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 18:10:12 UTC+1, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 05.49.19 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 17:52:25 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 02:37:13 UTC+1, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 01:51:39 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:54:43 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen >> > <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 00.32.30 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin: >> > >> On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 13:53:18 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 21.59.15 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund >> > >> >> >>> ><klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the
    microcontroller first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is
    lost, then the switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget.


    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off.
    It may need another resistor.

    it should work, either way is a bit weird to look at in simulation if you don't make the fet sources the ground
    The source-source node basically floats when both fets are off... >> > >> battling substrate diodes. So the power supply to the totem-pole opto
    could fail.

    how? C1 gets charged via D1 and Q2s body diode
    Yeah, OK, I guess it does work.
    Very nice solution, and a lot more clean than the transformer one I have been working on.

    Only worry is noise coupling into the gates, from transients. But that can be remedied by adding a capacitance to the gates of Q1 and Q2. Will slow switching times a little, but more robust.
    I just simulated Lasses solution. C1 needs to be 1uF due to charge transfer, otherwise the switching losses are too high
    What sort of switching rates do you need? Entire cycles at 50 Hz? Fast PWM? The triac solution wouldn't switch fast, and a heater shouldn't
    need a lot of switching.
    I assume Klaus did the calculations and concluded that a slow turnon/turnoff at the wrong time would
    exceed the maximum allowable peak dissipation in the FETs

    You can vary the led drive, and the coupler CTRs, to control mosfet
    edge rates. I think EMI was an issue for you so you may not want fast edges.

    To go faster, add a couple of transistors to drive the gate
    capacitance harder. One PNP, one NPN, one cent each.
    or splurge and spend 30 cent and get a real gatedriver and optocoupler in one, like for example TLP155

    The TLP155 does not has UVLO protection AFAICS.

    I have been looking at DGD1003, it has a UVLO of at least 8V, so fit's well. Less than 20cents

    https://www.diodes.com/assets/Datasheets/DGD1003.pdf

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to john larkin on Mon Nov 13 16:07:43 2023
    On Tuesday, 14 November 2023 at 00:41:36 UTC+1, john larkin wrote:
    On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 15:29:43 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 05:49:19 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 17:52:25 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 02:37:13 UTC+1, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 01:51:39 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:54:43 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen >> >> > <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 00.32.30 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin: >> >> > >> On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 13:53:18 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 21.59.15 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund >> >> > >> >> >>> ><klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the
    microcontroller first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is
    lost, then the switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget.


    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off.
    It may need another resistor.

    it should work, either way is a bit weird to look at in simulation if you don't make the fet sources the ground
    The source-source node basically floats when both fets are off... >> >> > >> battling substrate diodes. So the power supply to the totem-pole opto
    could fail.

    how? C1 gets charged via D1 and Q2s body diode
    Yeah, OK, I guess it does work.
    Very nice solution, and a lot more clean than the transformer one I have been working on.

    Only worry is noise coupling into the gates, from transients. But that can be remedied by adding a capacitance to the gates of Q1 and Q2. Will slow switching times a little, but more robust.
    I just simulated Lasses solution. C1 needs to be 1uF due to charge transfer, otherwise the switching losses are too high
    What sort of switching rates do you need? Entire cycles at 50 Hz? Fast
    PWM? The triac solution wouldn't switch fast, and a heater shouldn't
    need a lot of switching.

    Entire cycle, to reduce EMI. It will use something like 1s on, and 1s off, at least many periods between turn on and off.

    The edge rate is not that critical, it controls the envelope fall rate, which is at a very high frequency. At 50Hz (1Hz in case of 50cycles on/off), the emission is the same.
    What matters for the MOSFET case is transient dissipation, since that can easily result in very high transient temperature.
    Check the SOAR curves. A mosfet can dissipate a lot of power for a millisecond.

    For less than 1us, the selected MOSFET can only handle about 100W, and that's without the steady state temperature increase.


    Zero-cross switching solves the dynamic dissipation problem.

    Yes, can be done. But one rainy day, when the Zero crossing malfunctions and turns off at the peak, we have a problem.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lasse Langwadt Christensen@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 13 17:57:53 2023
    tirsdag den 14. november 2023 kl. 01.05.11 UTC+1 skrev Klaus Kragelund:
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 18:10:12 UTC+1, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 05.49.19 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 17:52:25 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 02:37:13 UTC+1, Klaus Kragelund wrote: >> On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 01:51:39 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:54:43 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 00.32.30 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin: >> > >> On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 13:53:18 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 21.59.15 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the
    microcontroller first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power is
    lost, then the switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget.


    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off.
    It may need another resistor.

    it should work, either way is a bit weird to look at in simulation if you don't make the fet sources the ground
    The source-source node basically floats when both fets are off...
    battling substrate diodes. So the power supply to the totem-pole opto
    could fail.

    how? C1 gets charged via D1 and Q2s body diode
    Yeah, OK, I guess it does work.
    Very nice solution, and a lot more clean than the transformer one I have been working on.

    Only worry is noise coupling into the gates, from transients. But that can be remedied by adding a capacitance to the gates of Q1 and Q2. Will slow switching times a little, but more robust.
    I just simulated Lasses solution. C1 needs to be 1uF due to charge transfer, otherwise the switching losses are too high
    What sort of switching rates do you need? Entire cycles at 50 Hz? Fast PWM? The triac solution wouldn't switch fast, and a heater shouldn't need a lot of switching.
    I assume Klaus did the calculations and concluded that a slow turnon/turnoff at the wrong time would
    exceed the maximum allowable peak dissipation in the FETs

    You can vary the led drive, and the coupler CTRs, to control mosfet
    edge rates. I think EMI was an issue for you so you may not want fast edges.

    To go faster, add a couple of transistors to drive the gate
    capacitance harder. One PNP, one NPN, one cent each.
    or splurge and spend 30 cent and get a real gatedriver and optocoupler in one, like for example TLP155
    The TLP155 does not has UVLO protection AFAICS.

    I have been looking at DGD1003, it has a UVLO of at least 8V, so fit's well. Less than 20cents

    https://www.diodes.com/assets/Datasheets/DGD1003.pdf

    but it doesn't have the opto isolation build in

    it might be possible to do some clever short circuit protection with an IR2127

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jan Panteltje@21:1/5 to jl@650pot.com on Tue Nov 14 06:17:58 2023
    On a sunny day (Mon, 13 Nov 2023 14:51:29 -0800) it happened john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote in <g1a5li971od02t8ecqhq8ljb21cvpdik9u@4ax.com>:

    On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:37:45 -0800 (PST), Fred Bloggs ><bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 6:14:58?PM UTC-5, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    If you're looking for cheap, you can't beat capacitor coupling the gate drive. Phillips has a whole chapter in their MOSFET
    applications handbook on how to do this reliably-wasn't in the market for the technique at the time and skipped it.
    \

    One problem is achieving safe isolation from the 230 VAC power lines.

    Build in a cheap Chinese wallwart.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Klaus Kragelund@21:1/5 to Lasse Langwadt Christensen on Tue Nov 14 01:04:59 2023
    On Tuesday, 14 November 2023 at 02:57:58 UTC+1, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
    tirsdag den 14. november 2023 kl. 01.05.11 UTC+1 skrev Klaus Kragelund:
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 18:10:12 UTC+1, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 05.49.19 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 17:52:25 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 02:37:13 UTC+1, Klaus Kragelund wrote: >> On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 01:51:39 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote: >> > On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:54:43 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 00.32.30 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 13:53:18 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 21.59.15 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet?

    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the
    microcontroller first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power
    is lost, then the switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget.


    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off.
    It may need another resistor.

    it should work, either way is a bit weird to look at in simulation if you don't make the fet sources the ground
    The source-source node basically floats when both fets are off...
    battling substrate diodes. So the power supply to the totem-pole opto
    could fail.

    how? C1 gets charged via D1 and Q2s body diode
    Yeah, OK, I guess it does work.
    Very nice solution, and a lot more clean than the transformer one I have been working on.

    Only worry is noise coupling into the gates, from transients. But that can be remedied by adding a capacitance to the gates of Q1 and Q2. Will slow switching times a little, but more robust.
    I just simulated Lasses solution. C1 needs to be 1uF due to charge transfer, otherwise the switching losses are too high
    What sort of switching rates do you need? Entire cycles at 50 Hz? Fast PWM? The triac solution wouldn't switch fast, and a heater shouldn't need a lot of switching.
    I assume Klaus did the calculations and concluded that a slow turnon/turnoff at the wrong time would
    exceed the maximum allowable peak dissipation in the FETs

    You can vary the led drive, and the coupler CTRs, to control mosfet edge rates. I think EMI was an issue for you so you may not want fast edges.

    To go faster, add a couple of transistors to drive the gate capacitance harder. One PNP, one NPN, one cent each.
    or splurge and spend 30 cent and get a real gatedriver and optocoupler in one, like for example TLP155
    The TLP155 does not has UVLO protection AFAICS.

    I have been looking at DGD1003, it has a UVLO of at least 8V, so fit's well. Less than 20cents

    https://www.diodes.com/assets/Datasheets/DGD1003.pdf
    but it doesn't have the opto isolation build in

    I will only use it to drive the FETs, to make sure I have sufficient gate current.
    Come to think about it, why not just use a high-side gatedriver, with a circuit to supply the HS supply? Then the circuit simplifies to just a gatedriver and the FETs....

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lasse Langwadt Christensen@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 14 03:37:47 2023
    tirsdag den 14. november 2023 kl. 10.05.05 UTC+1 skrev Klaus Kragelund:
    On Tuesday, 14 November 2023 at 02:57:58 UTC+1, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
    tirsdag den 14. november 2023 kl. 01.05.11 UTC+1 skrev Klaus Kragelund:
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 18:10:12 UTC+1, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:
    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 05.49.19 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 17:52:25 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 02:37:13 UTC+1, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
    On Monday, 13 November 2023 at 01:51:39 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote: >> > On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 15:54:43 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    mandag den 13. november 2023 kl. 00.32.30 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 13:53:18 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 21.59.15 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:55:40 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:00:03 -0800 (PST), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
    <lang...@fonz.dk> wrote:

    s?ndag den 12. november 2023 kl. 18.15.35 UTC+1 skrev John Larkin:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:44:41 -0800, John Larkin <j...@997PotHill.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 03:29:02 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, 12 November 2023 at 01:02:21 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:57:11 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Friday, 10 November 2023 at 16:28:14 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
    On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:14:53 -0800 (PST), Klaus Kragelund
    <klaus.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Hi

    I am on the lookout for a cheap 1:1 pulse transformer. Will be using it to drive a MOSFET based Solid State Switch.

    I know Larkin has used the DRQ127

    https://www.digikey.dk/en/products/detail/eaton-electronics-division/DRQ127-1R5-R/667262

    But, I am looking to see if I can find bottom dollar.

    I probably wont go to LCSC, so would prefer a known brand.

    Anyone got a recommendation?

    Cheers

    Klaus
    Are you driving the gate of a fet? What fet? >> > >> >> >>> >>> >
    STB43N60DM2

    I did a change to the design, since the 1:10 transformer was bugging me, so used a old fashion CD4093 from 15V supply, to make an isolated supply with a 1:1 transformer.

    Then an opto to contol the MOSFETs. Emitter followers to lower the impedance driving the gate, since the turn on/turn off losses needs to be kept low due to transient thermal resistance.

    Schematics, first draft:

    www.electronicsdesign.dk/tmp/ssr.pdf

    Some comments:

    UVLO is handled by the microcontroller in that the PSU starts when power is applied, but the microcontroller is not allowed to turn the FET on until we are sure the PSU is active (milliseconds). Likewise, during shutdown the
    microcontroller first disables the opto.

    We need to have UVLO detection on the 15V power supply for the self-running oscillator, in case of a brown-out – lower voltage of the 15V node, the opto needs to be turned off before voltage sags deeper. Normally, if power
    is lost, then the switch off loss is also zero, but we could have a situation with low mains voltage and we need to take actions accordingly.

    MOSFET selected is STB43N60DM2, 100mohm/D2PAK, about 40K/W with current layout.
    At 100mohm/3.7A, loss is 1.3W. 600V device to have 60% derating from peak of 360V.

    275V varistor SIOV1 is placed across drain/drain of MOSFETs. We might be able to use lower voltage rated MOSFETs due to thje varistor.
    MOSFETs are avalanche rated for 800mJ.

    K = 0.015 for less than 10us switching time. Estimated for 1us..
    Rth = 40K/W. Transient Rth = 0.6K/W
    Since you have that 230 VAC source, you could make a gate power supply
    from that. The little capacitor-limited thing like people use to power
    LEDs from the AC line.

    Actually the capacitive couplers are not very good when it comes to surges/transients on the mains line, so need to add impedance to reduce peak currents in the circuit.

    Sure, the LED night-light circuits include a series resistor.

    The totem-pole opto gate driver needs about zero supply current, so
    the series resistor can be big. Actually, the series resistor would
    work without a series cap. I can sketch it if it's not all clear.
    After this coffee diffuses into my brain.


    You could do your entire isolated gate driver for about 17 cents.

    something like this?

    Close. I was thinking

    https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ee9cpnt16nyxotka4zgkw/Isol_Gate_Driver_1.jpg?rlkey=v2o44hxa52eraurnuqpohmcp0&raw=1

    One could add a zener somewhere without blowing the 17 cent budget.


    That needs to be Spiced. It gets a little weird when the fets are off.
    It may need another resistor.

    it should work, either way is a bit weird to look at in simulation if you don't make the fet sources the ground
    The source-source node basically floats when both fets are off...
    battling substrate diodes. So the power supply to the totem-pole opto
    could fail.

    how? C1 gets charged via D1 and Q2s body diode
    Yeah, OK, I guess it does work.
    Very nice solution, and a lot more clean than the transformer one I have been working on.

    Only worry is noise coupling into the gates, from transients. But that can be remedied by adding a capacitance to the gates of Q1 and Q2. Will slow switching times a little, but more robust.
    I just simulated Lasses solution. C1 needs to be 1uF due to charge transfer, otherwise the switching losses are too high
    What sort of switching rates do you need? Entire cycles at 50 Hz? Fast
    PWM? The triac solution wouldn't switch fast, and a heater shouldn't need a lot of switching.
    I assume Klaus did the calculations and concluded that a slow turnon/turnoff at the wrong time would
    exceed the maximum allowable peak dissipation in the FETs

    You can vary the led drive, and the coupler CTRs, to control mosfet edge rates. I think EMI was an issue for you so you may not want fast
    edges.

    To go faster, add a couple of transistors to drive the gate capacitance harder. One PNP, one NPN, one cent each.
    or splurge and spend 30 cent and get a real gatedriver and optocoupler in one, like for example TLP155
    The TLP155 does not has UVLO protection AFAICS.

    I have been looking at DGD1003, it has a UVLO of at least 8V, so fit's well. Less than 20cents

    https://www.diodes.com/assets/Datasheets/DGD1003.pdf
    but it doesn't have the opto isolation build in
    I will only use it to drive the FETs, to make sure I have sufficient gate current.
    Come to think about it, why not just use a high-side gatedriver, with a circuit to supply the HS supply? Then the circuit simplifies to just a gatedriver and the FETs....

    you only need a low side driver and it still needs to be isolated, or have all of you control circuitry referenced to the source-source node

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From kim leng@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 14 17:25:07 2023
    https://maps.google.com/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.de/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.co.jp/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.fr/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.fr/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.es/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.es/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.it/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.com.br/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://maps.google.ca/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.com.hk/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.nl/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.nl/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.co.in/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.ru/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.pl/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.com.au/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.com.au/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.com.tw/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.com.tw/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.co.id/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.com/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.at/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.at/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.cz/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.co.th/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.com.ua/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.com.tr/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.com.mx/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.dk/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.dk/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.hu/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.fi/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.com.vn/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.pt/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.pt/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.com.my/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.com.my/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.co.za/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.co.za/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.com.sg/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.gr/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.gr/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.co.il/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.cl/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.cl/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.ie/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.ie/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.sk/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.bg/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.bg/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.com.pe/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.com.co/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.com.sa/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.com.sa/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.hr/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.hr/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.co.ve/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.co.ve/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.ee/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.si/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.com.ec/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.lv/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.com.uy/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.com.bd/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.com.do/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://maps.google.com.do/url?sa=t&url=https://159.223.77.70/ https://images.google.ps/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://www.google.ps/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://images.google.tn/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://maps.google.tn/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://maps.google.com.lb/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://images.google.com.lb/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://maps.google.dz/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://images.google.dz/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://www.google.dz/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://maps.google.com.np/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://images.google.jo/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://maps.google.jo/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://www.google.jo/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://images.google.com.kh/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://maps.google.com.kh/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://www.google.com.kh/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://maps.google.mu/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://images.google.mu/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://www.google.mu/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://images.google.com.af/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://images.google.com.mt/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://maps.google.com.mt/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://maps.google.com.jm/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://images.google.com.jm/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://www.google.com.jm/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://maps.google.as/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://maps.google.iq/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://images.google.iq/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://www.google.iq/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://maps.google.ad/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://images.google.ad/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://www.google.ad/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://images.google.com.qa/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://maps.google.com.qa/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://www.google.com.qa/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F https://maps.google.com.ly/url?q=https://159.223.77.70/%2F

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)