john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:YEWiJGP8nVJdlmIf1bwj6kW8ZaQVj8XtIGwlLgVa4tPz5ednrtuuRQiRkNY&utm_content=279665588&utm_source=hs_email
https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=TAV1-541NM%2B&utm_campaign=Product%20Focus%20Emails%202023%20%26%20Onward&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=279821766&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9MbcHJHjYg6_2uzVDHSL13EsHrk1Q6ZhSHQEwOQSif6Y1l55GNDwI_
MiniCircuits calls these both MMICs and Transistors, but they sure
look like bare transistors.
The 45 MHz lower frequency limit is strange.
THey do have DC curves, which is refreshing in an RF part.
Rds-on, seldom specified for an RF part, looks like about 5 ohms.
I wish they had Spice models.
I do not find the DC curves in the datasheet. Can you give a hint?
https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=TAV1-541NM%2B&utm_campaign=Product%20Focus%20Emails%202023%20%26%20Onward&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=279821766&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9MbcHJHjYg6_2uzVDHSL13EsHrk1Q6ZhSHQEwOQSif6Y1l55GNDwI_YEWiJGP8nVJdlmIf1bwj6kW8ZaQVj8XtIGwlLgVa4tPz5ednrtuuRQiRkNY&utm_content=279665588&utm_source=hs_email
MiniCircuits calls these both MMICs and Transistors, but they sure
look like bare transistors.
The 45 MHz lower frequency limit is strange.
THey do have DC curves, which is refreshing in an RF part.
Rds-on, seldom specified for an RF part, looks like about 5 ohms.
I wish they had Spice models.
john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:YEWiJGP8nVJdlmIf1bwj6kW8ZaQVj8XtIGwlLgVa4tPz5ednrtuuRQiRkNY&utm_content=279665588&utm_source=hs_email
https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=TAV1-541NM%2B&utm_campaign=Product%20Focus%20Emails%202023%20%26%20Onward&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=279821766&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9MbcHJHjYg6_2uzVDHSL13EsHrk1Q6ZhSHQEwOQSif6Y1l55GNDwI_
MiniCircuits calls these both MMICs and Transistors, but they sure
look like bare transistors.
The 45 MHz lower frequency limit is strange.
THey do have DC curves, which is refreshing in an RF part.
Rds-on, seldom specified for an RF part, looks like about 5 ohms.
I wish they had Spice models.
I do not find the DC curves in the datasheet. Can you give a hint?
On 10/26/2023 23:13, john larkin wrote:YEWiJGP8nVJdlmIf1bwj6kW8ZaQVj8XtIGwlLgVa4tPz5ednrtuuRQiRkNY&utm_content=279665588&utm_source=hs_email
On 26 Oct 2023 19:54:19 GMT, Uwe Bonnes
<bon@hertz.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=TAV1-541NM%2B&utm_campaign=Product%20Focus%20Emails%202023%20%26%20Onward&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=279821766&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9MbcHJHjYg6_2uzVDHSL13EsHrk1Q6ZhSHQEwOQSif6Y1l55GNDwI_
MiniCircuits calls these both MMICs and Transistors, but they sure
look like bare transistors.
The 45 MHz lower frequency limit is strange.
THey do have DC curves, which is refreshing in an RF part.
Rds-on, seldom specified for an RF part, looks like about 5 ohms.
I wish they had Spice models.
I do not find the DC curves in the datasheet. Can you give a hint?
Data sheet page 3. That suggets operation down to DC.
The 45 MHz might be caused by coupling caps on the eval board or
something. I want to use parts like these as switches.
Some MMICs have internal bias circuits that indeed wreck the low
frequency response.
They do look interesting as switches indeed.
Are they JFET-s? That gate-source +0.7V max and the max gate
current suggest sort of that, although 0.7 looks too high.
I have biased (during wrestling this or that, not in an end
product IIRC) JFETS slightly above 0 G-S to get even less
channel resistance but they must have brought that to a
new level somehow.
On 26 Oct 2023 19:54:19 GMT, Uwe Bonnes <bon@hertz.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:YEWiJGP8nVJdlmIf1bwj6kW8ZaQVj8XtIGwlLgVa4tPz5ednrtuuRQiRkNY&utm_content=279665588&utm_source=hs_email
john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=TAV1-541NM%2B&utm_campaign=Product%20Focus%20Emails%202023%20%26%20Onward&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=279821766&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9MbcHJHjYg6_2uzVDHSL13EsHrk1Q6ZhSHQEwOQSif6Y1l55GNDwI_
MiniCircuits calls these both MMICs and Transistors, but they sure
look like bare transistors.
The 45 MHz lower frequency limit is strange.
THey do have DC curves, which is refreshing in an RF part.
Rds-on, seldom specified for an RF part, looks like about 5 ohms.
I wish they had Spice models.
I do not find the DC curves in the datasheet. Can you give a hint?
Data sheet page 3. That suggets operation down to DC.
The 45 MHz might be caused by coupling caps on the eval board or
something. I want to use parts like these as switches.
Some MMICs have internal bias circuits that indeed wreck the low
frequency response.
On 10/26/2023 23:13, john larkin wrote:YEWiJGP8nVJdlmIf1bwj6kW8ZaQVj8XtIGwlLgVa4tPz5ednrtuuRQiRkNY&utm_content=279665588&utm_source=hs_email
On 26 Oct 2023 19:54:19 GMT, Uwe Bonnes
<bon@hertz.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=TAV1-541NM%2B&utm_campaign=Product%20Focus%20Emails%202023%20%26%20Onward&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=279821766&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9MbcHJHjYg6_2uzVDHSL13EsHrk1Q6ZhSHQEwOQSif6Y1l55GNDwI_
MiniCircuits calls these both MMICs and Transistors, but they sure
look like bare transistors.
The 45 MHz lower frequency limit is strange.
THey do have DC curves, which is refreshing in an RF part.
Rds-on, seldom specified for an RF part, looks like about 5 ohms.
I wish they had Spice models.
I do not find the DC curves in the datasheet. Can you give a hint?
Data sheet page 3. That suggets operation down to DC.
The 45 MHz might be caused by coupling caps on the eval board or
something. I want to use parts like these as switches.
Some MMICs have internal bias circuits that indeed wreck the low
frequency response.
They do look interesting as switches indeed.
Are they JFET-s? That gate-source +0.7V max and the max gate
current suggest sort of that, although 0.7 looks too high.
I have biased (during wrestling this or that, not in an end
product IIRC) JFETS slightly above 0 G-S to get even less
channel resistance but they must have brought that to a
new level somehow.
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 01:19:18 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com>YEWiJGP8nVJdlmIf1bwj6kW8ZaQVj8XtIGwlLgVa4tPz5ednrtuuRQiRkNY&utm_content=279665588&utm_source=hs_email
wrote:
On 10/26/2023 23:13, john larkin wrote:
On 26 Oct 2023 19:54:19 GMT, Uwe Bonnes
<bon@hertz.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=TAV1-541NM%2B&utm_campaign=Product%20Focus%20Emails%202023%20%26%20Onward&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=279821766&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9MbcHJHjYg6_2uzVDHSL13EsHrk1Q6ZhSHQEwOQSif6Y1l55GNDwI_
MiniCircuits calls these both MMICs and Transistors, but they sure
look like bare transistors.
The 45 MHz lower frequency limit is strange.
THey do have DC curves, which is refreshing in an RF part.
Rds-on, seldom specified for an RF part, looks like about 5 ohms.
I wish they had Spice models.
I do not find the DC curves in the datasheet. Can you give a hint?
Data sheet page 3. That suggets operation down to DC.
The 45 MHz might be caused by coupling caps on the eval board or
something. I want to use parts like these as switches.
Some MMICs have internal bias circuits that indeed wreck the low
frequency response.
They do look interesting as switches indeed.
Are they JFET-s? That gate-source +0.7V max and the max gate
current suggest sort of that, although 0.7 looks too high.
I have biased (during wrestling this or that, not in an end
product IIRC) JFETS slightly above 0 G-S to get even less
channel resistance but they must have brought that to a
new level somehow.
These are phemts, which are enhancement mode parts that turn on at a
few tenths of a volt. Capacitances are crazy low. We use them as
switches, typically to discharge a timing ramp capacitor or some such.
I have taken a lot of data on their SAV541 and SAV551 parts, which
look very similar. I can post that if anyone is interested. The SAVs
have wire bonds inside; maybe these don't.
I did find remarkable effects if they are driven past suggested data
sheet limits. They just keep enhancing!
The Supertex depletion-mode mosfets enhance some too.
john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:YEWiJGP8nVJdlmIf1bwj6kW8ZaQVj8XtIGwlLgVa4tPz5ednrtuuRQiRkNY&utm_content=279665588&utm_source=hs_email
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 01:19:18 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com>
wrote:
On 10/26/2023 23:13, john larkin wrote:
On 26 Oct 2023 19:54:19 GMT, Uwe Bonnes
<bon@hertz.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=TAV1-541NM%2B&utm_campaign=Product%20Focus%20Emails%202023%20%26%20Onward&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=279821766&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9MbcHJHjYg6_2uzVDHSL13EsHrk1Q6ZhSHQEwOQSif6Y1l55GNDwI_
MiniCircuits calls these both MMICs and Transistors, but they sure >>>>>> look like bare transistors.
The 45 MHz lower frequency limit is strange.
THey do have DC curves, which is refreshing in an RF part.
Rds-on, seldom specified for an RF part, looks like about 5 ohms.
I wish they had Spice models.
I do not find the DC curves in the datasheet. Can you give a hint?
Data sheet page 3. That suggets operation down to DC.
The 45 MHz might be caused by coupling caps on the eval board or
something. I want to use parts like these as switches.
Some MMICs have internal bias circuits that indeed wreck the low
frequency response.
They do look interesting as switches indeed.
Are they JFET-s? That gate-source +0.7V max and the max gate
current suggest sort of that, although 0.7 looks too high.
I have biased (during wrestling this or that, not in an end
product IIRC) JFETS slightly above 0 G-S to get even less
channel resistance but they must have brought that to a
new level somehow.
These are phemts, which are enhancement mode parts that turn on at a
few tenths of a volt. Capacitances are crazy low. We use them as
switches, typically to discharge a timing ramp capacitor or some such.
I have taken a lot of data on their SAV541 and SAV551 parts, which
look very similar. I can post that if anyone is interested. The SAVs
have wire bonds inside; maybe these don't.
I did find remarkable effects if they are driven past suggested data
sheet limits. They just keep enhancing!
The Supertex depletion-mode mosfets enhance some too.
Any and all measurements welcome!
Thanks
Phil Hobbs
https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=TAV1-541NM%2B&utm_campaign=Product%20Focus%20Emails%202023%20%26%20Onward&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=279821766&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9MbcHJHjYg6_2uzVDHSL13EsHrk1Q6ZhSHQEwOQSif6Y1l55GNDwI_YEWiJGP8nVJdlmIf1bwj6kW8ZaQVj8XtIGwlLgVa4tPz5ednrtuuRQiRkNY&utm_content=279665588&utm_source=hs_email
MiniCircuits calls these both MMICs and Transistors, but they sure
look like bare transistors.
The 45 MHz lower frequency limit is strange.
THey do have DC curves, which is refreshing in an RF part.
Rds-on, seldom specified for an RF part, looks like about 5 ohms.
I wish they had Spice models.
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 10:19:50 -0700, john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:YEWiJGP8nVJdlmIf1bwj6kW8ZaQVj8XtIGwlLgVa4tPz5ednrtuuRQiRkNY&utm_content=279665588&utm_source=hs_email
https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=TAV1-541NM%2B&utm_campaign=Product%20Focus%20Emails%202023%20%26%20Onward&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=279821766&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9MbcHJHjYg6_2uzVDHSL13EsHrk1Q6ZhSHQEwOQSif6Y1l55GNDwI_
MiniCircuits calls these both MMICs and Transistors, but they sure
look like bare transistors.
The 45 MHz lower frequency limit is strange.
THey do have DC curves, which is refreshing in an RF part.
Rds-on, seldom specified for an RF part, looks like about 5 ohms.
I wish they had Spice models.
Package size and pinout is roughly equivalent to HP 'minipak'
used for HMPP-3890/92/95.
RL
https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=TAV1-541NM%2B&utm_campaign=Product%20Focus%20Emails%202023%20%26%20Onward&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=279821766&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9MbcHJHjYg6_2uzVDHSL13EsHrk1Q6ZhSHQEwOQSif6Y1l55GNDwI_YEWiJGP8nVJdlmIf1bwj6kW8ZaQVj8XtIGwlLgVa4tPz5ednrtuuRQiRkNY&utm_content=279665588&utm_source=hs_email
MiniCircuits calls these both MMICs and Transistors, but they sure
look like bare transistors.
The 45 MHz lower frequency limit is strange.
THey do have DC curves, which is refreshing in an RF part.
Rds-on, seldom specified for an RF part, looks like about 5 ohms.
I wish they had Spice models.
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 01:19:18 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com>YEWiJGP8nVJdlmIf1bwj6kW8ZaQVj8XtIGwlLgVa4tPz5ednrtuuRQiRkNY&utm_content=279665588&utm_source=hs_email
wrote:
On 10/26/2023 23:13, john larkin wrote:
On 26 Oct 2023 19:54:19 GMT, Uwe Bonnes
<bon@hertz.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de> wrote:
john larkin <jl@650pot.com> wrote:
https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=TAV1-541NM%2B&utm_campaign=Product%20Focus%20Emails%202023%20%26%20Onward&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=279821766&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9MbcHJHjYg6_2uzVDHSL13EsHrk1Q6ZhSHQEwOQSif6Y1l55GNDwI_
MiniCircuits calls these both MMICs and Transistors, but they sure
look like bare transistors.
The 45 MHz lower frequency limit is strange.
THey do have DC curves, which is refreshing in an RF part.
Rds-on, seldom specified for an RF part, looks like about 5 ohms.
I wish they had Spice models.
I do not find the DC curves in the datasheet. Can you give a hint?
Data sheet page 3. That suggets operation down to DC.
The 45 MHz might be caused by coupling caps on the eval board or
something. I want to use parts like these as switches.
Some MMICs have internal bias circuits that indeed wreck the low
frequency response.
They do look interesting as switches indeed.
Are they JFET-s? That gate-source +0.7V max and the max gate
current suggest sort of that, although 0.7 looks too high.
I have biased (during wrestling this or that, not in an end
product IIRC) JFETS slightly above 0 G-S to get even less
channel resistance but they must have brought that to a
new level somehow.
They are not JFETS. MiniCircuits has a good summary.
.<https://blog.minicircuits.com/mmic-technologies-pseudomorphic-high-electron-mobility-transistor-phemt/>
People have observed that pHEMTs seem to have relatively low flicker
noise for a GHz amplifier. My guess is that this is because very
clean materials and processes are needed to make a pHEMT.
Joe Gwinn
On 2023-10-26 13:19, john larkin wrote:YEWiJGP8nVJdlmIf1bwj6kW8ZaQVj8XtIGwlLgVa4tPz5ednrtuuRQiRkNY&utm_content=279665588&utm_source=hs_email
https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=TAV1-541NM%2B&utm_campaign=Product%20Focus%20Emails%202023%20%26%20Onward&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=279821766&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9MbcHJHjYg6_2uzVDHSL13EsHrk1Q6ZhSHQEwOQSif6Y1l55GNDwI_
MiniCircuits calls these both MMICs and Transistors, but they sure
look like bare transistors.
The 45 MHz lower frequency limit is strange.
THey do have DC curves, which is refreshing in an RF part.
Rds-on, seldom specified for an RF part, looks like about 5 ohms.
I wish they had Spice models.
Those are the same as the SAV series, but in a different package. The
$70 sample kit has both kinds.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
PIN diodes. Interestingly also specified to 6 GHz max. The phemt has a
funny round 5th pin of unknown function.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 89:56:19 |
Calls: | 6,717 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,252 |
Messages: | 5,358,853 |
Posted today: | 1 |