• Over the past three years, China has provided over 2.2 billion COVID-19

    From a a@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 28 03:22:27 2023
    Over the past three years, China has provided over 2.2 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses to more than 120 countries and international organizations, and such contribution has offered vital support to developing nations in their battle against the pandemic.
    http://xhtxs.cn/Iz1

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From a a@21:1/5 to a a on Thu Sep 28 11:27:38 2023
    XPost: free.spam

    The absolute idiot "Darius the Dumb" persisting in being an Off-topic troll...

    --
    a a <manta103g@gmail.com> wrote:

    X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:b23:b0:65a:fea1:5919 with SMTP id w3-20020a0562140b2300b0065afea15919mr7829qvj.4.1695896548596;
    Thu, 28 Sep 2023 03:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:198c:b0:3ab:81e4:4d78 with SMTP id
    bj12-20020a056808198c00b003ab81e44d78mr322039oib.8.1695896548207; Thu, 28 Sep
    2023 03:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
    Path: not-for-mail
    Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
    Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 03:22:27 -0700 (PDT)
    Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=46.134.142.247; posting-account=XS5sXwoAAABKU0kHcsk_nashWaidAu0Q
    NNTP-Posting-Host: 46.134.142.247
    User-Agent: G2/1.0
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Message-ID: <667c6983-2e2e-4ce2-a3da-4de306fa8255n@googlegroups.com>
    Subject: Over the past three years, China has provided over 2.2 billion
    COVID-19 vaccine doses to more than 120 countries and international
    organizations, and such contribution has offered vital support to developing
    nations in their battle against the pandem
    From: a a <manta103g@gmail.com>
    Injection-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 10:22:28 +0000
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    X-Received-Bytes: 1619

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From a a@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 28 10:39:29 2023


    Yet one more #veryStupidByLowIQaa post.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to a a on Thu Sep 28 05:38:33 2023
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:22:33 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:
    Over the past three years, China has provided over 2.2 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses to more than 120 countries and international organizations, and such contribution has offered vital support to developing nations in their battle against the pandemic.
    http://xhtxs.cn/Iz1

    Of course it's an old-fashioned and not all that effective vaccine. but still better than nothing.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Thu Sep 28 07:18:09 2023
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:38:39 AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:22:33 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:
    Over the past three years, China has provided over 2.2 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses to more than 120 countries and international organizations, and such contribution has offered vital support to developing nations in their battle against the
    pandemic. http://xhtxs.cn/Iz1
    Of course it's an old-fashioned and not all that effective vaccine. but still better than nothing.

    Actually it is pretty effective at about 80%, and that's even for protection against symptomatic infection. At least one study out of the middle east [Jordon] reports a trial of direct comparison between Sinopharm and Pfizer. The protection was identical
    for practical purposes.

    https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/the-sinopharm-covid-19-vaccine-what-you-need-to-know

    Cost is all anyone cares about, Sinopharm was less than 10% the per dose.


    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Thu Sep 28 07:57:40 2023
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 12:18:15 AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:38:39 AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:22:33 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:
    Over the past three years, China has provided over 2.2 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses to more than 120 countries and international organizations, and such contribution has offered vital support to developing nations in their battle against the
    pandemic. http://xhtxs.cn/Iz1

    Of course it's an old-fashioned and not all that effective vaccine. but still better than nothing.

    Actually it is pretty effective at about 80%, and that's even for protection against symptomatic infection. At least one study out of the middle east [Jordon] reports a trial of direct comparison between Sinopharm and Pfizer. The protection was
    identical for practical purposes.

    That wasn't what was reported from Indonesia, who weren't that impressed with it.

    https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/the-sinopharm-covid-19-vaccine-what-you-need-to-know

    Cost is all anyone cares about, Sinopharm was less than 10% the per dose.

    Speak for yourself. Effectiveness is what matters, and anybody sane is very interested in that.

    https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n912/rr-0

    says that Sinopharm isn't actually any cheaper than any of the other vaccines. There are reports that all the machine manufacturers are charging more than the cost of production - about ten times as much, which isn't unreasonable as they need to recover
    the development and testing costs before the virus has mutated out reach of their vaccine

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Thu Sep 28 08:51:13 2023
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 10:57:45 AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 12:18:15 AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:38:39 AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:22:33 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:
    Over the past three years, China has provided over 2.2 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses to more than 120 countries and international organizations, and such contribution has offered vital support to developing nations in their battle against the
    pandemic. http://xhtxs.cn/Iz1

    Of course it's an old-fashioned and not all that effective vaccine. but still better than nothing.

    Actually it is pretty effective at about 80%, and that's even for protection against symptomatic infection. At least one study out of the middle east [Jordon] reports a trial of direct comparison between Sinopharm and Pfizer. The protection was
    identical for practical purposes.
    That wasn't what was reported from Indonesia, who weren't that impressed with it.
    https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/the-sinopharm-covid-19-vaccine-what-you-need-to-know

    Cost is all anyone cares about, Sinopharm was less than 10% the per dose.
    Speak for yourself. Effectiveness is what matters, and anybody sane is very interested in that.

    In principle, yes, in reality, no.

    Most of the world is overpopulated and suffers from the problems that accompany that. They're glad to be relieved of the excess. Of course the governments have to perpetuate the charade of concern for the people to avoid politically destabilizing
    discontent.


    https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n912/rr-0

    says that Sinopharm isn't actually any cheaper than any of the other vaccines. There are reports that all the machine manufacturers are charging more than the cost of production - about ten times as much, which isn't unreasonable as they need to
    recover the development and testing costs before the virus has mutated out reach of their vaccine

    The story was about China giving the vaccine away. It doesn't get any cheaper than that. Whatever they're selling it for in the first world is of no real consequence.


    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Thu Sep 28 09:24:50 2023
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 1:51:18 AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 10:57:45 AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 12:18:15 AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:38:39 AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:22:33 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:
    Over the past three years, China has provided over 2.2 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses to more than 120 countries and international organizations, and such contribution has offered vital support to developing nations in their battle against the
    pandemic. http://xhtxs.cn/Iz1

    Of course it's an old-fashioned and not all that effective vaccine. but still better than nothing.

    Actually it is pretty effective at about 80%, and that's even for protection against symptomatic infection. At least one study out of the middle east [Jordon] reports a trial of direct comparison between Sinopharm and Pfizer. The protection was
    identical for practical purposes.

    That wasn't what was reported from Indonesia, who weren't that impressed with it.

    https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/the-sinopharm-covid-19-vaccine-what-you-need-to-know

    Cost is all anyone cares about, Sinopharm was less than 10% the per dose.

    Speak for yourself. Effectiveness is what matters, and anybody sane is very interested in that.

    In principle, yes, in reality, no.

    Most of the world is overpopulated and suffers from the problems that accompany that. They're glad to be relieved of the excess.

    But don't admit it, or act that way.

    Of course the governments have to perpetuate the charade of concern for the people to avoid politically destabilizing discontent.

    The US medical system and the absence of any effective firearms control suggest that the American government thinks that way. They'd be strung up from lamp=posts by a better-educated population.
    Many advanced industrial countries have better behaved governments, and they are more careful with the lives of their citizens.

    https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n912/rr-0

    says that Sinopharm isn't actually any cheaper than any of the other vaccines. There are reports that all the machine manufacturers are charging more than the cost of production - about ten times as much, which isn't unreasonable as they need to
    recover the development and testing costs before the virus has mutated out reach of their vaccine.

    The story was about China giving the vaccine away. It doesn't get any cheaper than that. Whatever they're selling it for in the first world is of no real consequence.

    What China is buying with cheap vaccine handouts is often pretty obvious. When you look at what they are after, it doesn't look quite as cheap.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Thu Sep 28 09:31:46 2023
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:24:55 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 1:51:18 AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 10:57:45 AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 12:18:15 AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:38:39 AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 8:22:33 PM UTC+10, a a wrote:
    Over the past three years, China has provided over 2.2 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses to more than 120 countries and international organizations, and such contribution has offered vital support to developing nations in their battle against
    the pandemic. http://xhtxs.cn/Iz1

    Of course it's an old-fashioned and not all that effective vaccine. but still better than nothing.

    Actually it is pretty effective at about 80%, and that's even for protection against symptomatic infection. At least one study out of the middle east [Jordon] reports a trial of direct comparison between Sinopharm and Pfizer. The protection was
    identical for practical purposes.

    That wasn't what was reported from Indonesia, who weren't that impressed with it.

    https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/the-sinopharm-covid-19-vaccine-what-you-need-to-know

    Cost is all anyone cares about, Sinopharm was less than 10% the per dose.

    Speak for yourself. Effectiveness is what matters, and anybody sane is very interested in that.

    In principle, yes, in reality, no.

    Most of the world is overpopulated and suffers from the problems that accompany that. They're glad to be relieved of the excess.
    But don't admit it, or act that way.
    Of course the governments have to perpetuate the charade of concern for the people to avoid politically destabilizing discontent.
    The US medical system and the absence of any effective firearms control suggest that the American government thinks that way. They'd be strung up from lamp=posts by a better-educated population.
    Many advanced industrial countries have better behaved governments, and they are more careful with the lives of their citizens.

    https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n912/rr-0

    says that Sinopharm isn't actually any cheaper than any of the other vaccines. There are reports that all the machine manufacturers are charging more than the cost of production - about ten times as much, which isn't unreasonable as they need to
    recover the development and testing costs before the virus has mutated out reach of their vaccine.

    The story was about China giving the vaccine away. It doesn't get any cheaper than that. Whatever they're selling it for in the first world is of no real consequence.
    What China is buying with cheap vaccine handouts is often pretty obvious. When you look at what they are after, it doesn't look quite as cheap.

    U.S. banks have been doing the same with other countries. They were the ones who set the Greeks up for a total default.


    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)