For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 4:16:51 PM UTC-7, Cursitor Doom wrote:
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75
This all smacks of Orwell's the Ministry of Truth. God, was he ever prescient!
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 7:16:51 PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:University of Colorado Boulder.[1]...
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75
Roger A. Pielke Jr. (born November 2, 1968) is an American political scientist and professor, and was the director of the Sports Governance Center within the Department of Athletics at the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research at the
Stop right there. The moron is a high school dropout.
On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 9:16:51 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75
More rubbish from Zero Hedge.
On 9/18/2023 12:25 AM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 9:16:51 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote: >>> For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75
More rubbish from Zero Hedge.
Once you click through to the actual document signed by "1600
scientists" it becomes "scientists and professionals" and skimming
through the list I think there's that if I titled myself "Professional part-time big booty babe-hunter, and full-time climate skeptic" I would qualify to be a signatory
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75
On a sunny day (Mon, 18 Sep 2023 00:16:40 +0100) it happened Cursitor Doom <c...@notformail.com> wrote in <c32fgidf5apug64kn...@4ax.com>:
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75A quote from that link:
"In response last month, more than 1,600 scientists, among them two Nobel physics laureates, Clauser and Ivar Giaever of Norway,
signed a declaration stating that there is no climate emergency, and that climate advocacy has devolved into mass hysteria."
I have been saying this all the time, it is a similar hysteria like witch hunts were in medieval times!
It is all for profit selling snake oil fabricated and sustained by the US (remember that polar bear guy Al Gore?)
Maybe WW3 and the resulting mess will make people concentrate on what IS essential for survival.
After the Roman empire fell - and there are so many similarities: uprising of the slaves, Nero playing the fiddle in a burning Rome like Trump twittering -- bad leaders, a bad army and strategies, religious changes..., religious wars - followed bythe dark ages in Europe.. hundreds of years setback, climate change, mass migration.
Like today's events? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_the_Western_Roman_Empire
History has this tendency to repeat itself!!!!
On 9/18/2023 12:25 AM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 9:16:51?AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75
More rubbish from Zero Hedge.
Once you click through to the actual document signed by "1600
scientists" it becomes "scientists and professionals" and skimming
through the list I think there's that if I titled myself "Professional >part-time big booty babe-hunter, and full-time climate skeptic" I would >qualify to be a signatory
On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 9:16:51?AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75
More rubbish from Zero Hedge.
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75
On 9/17/2023 9:54 PM, Fred Bloggs wrote:University of Colorado Boulder.[1]...
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 7:16:51 PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75
Roger A. Pielke Jr. (born November 2, 1968) is an American political scientist and professor, and was the director of the Sports Governance Center within the Department of Athletics at the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research at the
Stop right there. The moron is a high school dropout.They had to pad out the list of "coalition of 1,609 scientist" with a
bunch of people like:
Ton J.T. Grimberg, Oil & Gas Professional, Finance Adviser
Wynn Williamson, co-founder and managing partner of real estate
developer BWRE
Mario Blais, Science and Mathematics Teacher
Magnus Cederlöf, Software Specialist, Stockholm
Mr. Anthony Jackson, Bachelor of Arts degree, Bachelor of Laws degree, retired
David Knox, IT professional, bachelors in business (Uni of South
Australia) and a Masters degree in business administration (Charles
Sturt University)
Neil Killion, MA in Psychology, active in the climate debate, member of
the Saltbush club
Drieu Godefridi PhD, Law, Author of several books
Jaak Peeters, Psychologist and Writer
Sherri Lange, CEO North American Platform Against Wind Power, Great
Lakes Wind Truth
etc..
Sure are a lot of lawyers, real estate hustlers, NIMBYs, code monkeys, computer dorks, generalized nobodies, and maybe even some stoners I went
to art school with on this list of "scientists"
On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 21:25:17 -0700 (PDT), Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 9:16:51?AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75
More rubbish from Zero Hedge.
That's a bit rich coming from someone who constantly cites Wikipedia!
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 7:16:51?PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75
This describes you to a T:positive attitudes towards science."
With little knowledge comes great confidence: Study reveals relationship between knowledge and attitudes toward science
"The results revealed two key findings. First, overconfidence tended to grow faster than knowledge, reaching its peak at intermediate levels of knowledge. Second, respondents with intermediate knowledge and high confidence also displayed the least
It boils down to you being too lazy to delve deeper into the subject matter, which would prevent you from forming a strong opinion based on total nonsense. And you don't need to go too deep to realize the fraud of sites like Zero Hedge
https://phys.org/news/2023-09-knowledge-great-confidence-reveals-relationship.html
Of course, the study may be imperfect. It could be more or less one of those confirmation bias things.
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 03:35:26 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 7:16:51?PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75
positive attitudes towards science."This describes you to a T:
With little knowledge comes great confidence: Study reveals relationship between knowledge and attitudes toward science
"The results revealed two key findings. First, overconfidence tended to grow faster than knowledge, reaching its peak at intermediate levels of knowledge. Second, respondents with intermediate knowledge and high confidence also displayed the least
2009 and spent the next two years studying what they have to tell us about CO2 levels.It boils down to you being too lazy to delve deeper into the subject matter, which would prevent you from forming a strong opinion based on total nonsense. And you don't need to go too deep to realize the fraud of sites like Zero Hedge
I'm afraid I can't let you get away with that, Fred. I acquired a third of a ton (literally) of physical, hard-copy reference books and the world's most trusted encyclopaedias plus 400 further reference books on DVD covering the period from 1860 to
I've posted links to my findings many times here as you will remember. I never believe *anything* I read online from *any* source when it comes to *any* subject which is politically-loaded.
As far as I'm concerned, they're all potentially compromised and not worthy of serious consideration. I probably know more about historical CO2 levels than anyone anywhere on Usenet.
I know what I'm talking about.
You and that idiot Bill Sloman don't.
You keep falling for all the BS the MSM keeps forcing down you to such an extent it's becoming embarrassing.
https://phys.org/news/2023-09-knowledge-great-confidence-reveals-relationship.html
Of course, the study may be imperfect. It could be more or less one of those confirmation bias things.
On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 11:30:50?PM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:positive attitudes towards science."
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 03:35:26 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 7:16:51?PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75
This describes you to a T:
With little knowledge comes great confidence: Study reveals relationship between knowledge and attitudes toward science
"The results revealed two key findings. First, overconfidence tended to grow faster than knowledge, reaching its peak at intermediate levels of knowledge. Second, respondents with intermediate knowledge and high confidence also displayed the least
2009 and spent the next two years studying what they have to tell us about CO2 levels.
It boils down to you being too lazy to delve deeper into the subject matter, which would prevent you from forming a strong opinion based on total nonsense. And you don't need to go too deep to realize the fraud of sites like Zero Hedge
I'm afraid I can't let you get away with that, Fred. I acquired a third of a ton (literally) of physical, hard-copy reference books and the world's most trusted encyclopaedias plus 400 further reference books on DVD covering the period from 1860 to
From what you've posted, every last one of them was out-of-date, and your enthusiasm for trusting 1890's atmospheric CO2 level measurements does rather depend on your assumption that the atmosphere in the labs of the period was representative of theatmosphere as a whole.
https://scrippsco2.ucsd.edu/history_legacy/charles_david_keeling_biography.htmlabout them being concocted by a massive conspiracy of climate scientists,
When Charles Keeling started measuring it properly, he found that he had to stick his observatory at top o Manua Loa to get stable and consistent measurements.
I've posted links to my findings many times here as you will remember. I never believe *anything* I read online from *any* source when it comes to *any* subject which is politically-loaded.
And you want it politically loaded in way that suits your silly ideas.
As far as I'm concerned, they're all potentially compromised and not worthy of serious consideration. I probably know more about historical CO2 levels than anyone anywhere on Usenet.
You may know about historical measurements, but what you "know" about historical levels reflects your enthusiasm for cherry picking. The real source of historical data is ice core samples, which go back about 800,000 years but you have this fairy story
by staring up your own backside.I know what I'm talking about.
You do seem to think that, but in reality you've merely got a perfectly splendid delusion which you've elaborated to an absurd degree, but it's still just a self-serving delusion designed to make you feel good about the "superior insight" which you get
extraction industry is paying them to propagate. The even wackier bits that you seem to read may not even be being bribed to lie.You and that idiot Bill Sloman don't.
And you congratulate yourself on your expertise and superior insight. It's total bollocks but your head is far up your own bottom that bollocks are all you can see,
You keep falling for all the BS the MSM keeps forcing down you to such an extent it's becoming embarrassing.
The peer-reviewed scientific literature isn't part of the main stream media. The more respectable bits of the main stream media report on the actual science from time to time, but the bits owned by Rupert Murdoch tell the story that the fossil carbon
https://phys.org/news/2023-09-knowledge-great-confidence-reveals-relationship.html
Of course, the study may be imperfect. It could be more or less one of those confirmation bias things.
Cursitor Doom's spectacular over-confidence and absurd ignorance do fit the study.
On 18.09.23 1:16, Cursitor Doom wrote:
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch of enlightenment?
NO!!!!!!!
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 08:03:50 -0700 (PDT), Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:positive attitudes towards science."
On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 11:30:50?PM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote: >> On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 03:35:26 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
<bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 7:16:51?PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote: >> >> For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch >> >> of enlightenment?
https://tinyurl.com/bdsc6x75
This describes you to a T:
With little knowledge comes great confidence: Study reveals relationship between knowledge and attitudes toward science
"The results revealed two key findings. First, overconfidence tended to grow faster than knowledge, reaching its peak at intermediate levels of knowledge. Second, respondents with intermediate knowledge and high confidence also displayed the least
2009 and spent the next two years studying what they have to tell us about CO2 levels.
It boils down to you being too lazy to delve deeper into the subject matter, which would prevent you from forming a strong opinion based on total nonsense. And you don't need to go too deep to realize the fraud of sites like Zero Hedge
I'm afraid I can't let you get away with that, Fred. I acquired a third of a ton (literally) of physical, hard-copy reference books and the world's most trusted encyclopaedias plus 400 further reference books on DVD covering the period from 1860 to
atmosphere as a whole.From what you've posted, every last one of them was out-of-date, and your enthusiasm for trusting 1890's atmospheric CO2 level measurements does rather depend on your assumption that the atmosphere in the labs of the period was representative of the
story about them being concocted by a massive conspiracy of climate scientists,https://scrippsco2.ucsd.edu/history_legacy/charles_david_keeling_biography.html
When Charles Keeling started measuring it properly, he found that he had to stick his observatory at top o Manua Loa to get stable and consistent measurements.
I've posted links to my findings many times here as you will remember. I never believe *anything* I read online from *any* source when it comes to *any* subject which is politically-loaded.
And you want it politically loaded in way that suits your silly ideas.
As far as I'm concerned, they're all potentially compromised and not worthy of serious consideration. I probably know more about historical CO2 levels than anyone anywhere on Usenet.
You may know about historical measurements, but what you "know" about historical levels reflects your enthusiasm for cherry picking. The real source of historical data is ice core samples, which go back about 800,000 years but you have this fairy
get by staring up your own backside.I know what I'm talking about.
You do seem to think that, but in reality you've merely got a perfectly splendid delusion which you've elaborated to an absurd degree, but it's still just a self-serving delusion designed to make you feel good about the "superior insight" which you
extraction industry is paying them to propagate. The even wackier bits that you seem to read may not even be being bribed to lie.You and that idiot Bill Sloman don't.
And you congratulate yourself on your expertise and superior insight. It's total bollocks but your head is far up your own bottom that bollocks are all you can see,
You keep falling for all the BS the MSM keeps forcing down you to such an extent it's becoming embarrassing.
The peer-reviewed scientific literature isn't part of the main stream media. The more respectable bits of the main stream media report on the actual science from time to time, but the bits owned by Rupert Murdoch tell the story that the fossil carbon
https://phys.org/news/2023-09-knowledge-great-confidence-reveals-relationship.html
Of course, the study may be imperfect. It could be more or less one of those confirmation bias things.
Cursitor Doom's spectacular over-confidence and absurd ignorance do fit the study.
Bill, you're just a troll and have been for the last 17 years or thereabouts.
You just enjoy stirring the pot and attempting - unsuccessfully - to appear superior to everyone else.
Fred, OTOH, there is still some hope for. Fred doesn't realise that he's being manipulated in the classic 'problem-reaction-solution' technique, which I'd assumed everyone here would be familiar with by now, but it seems not. Fred, check this outand step outside the box.
Stop doing your unseen masters' bidding.
https://christianobserver.net/what-is-the-hegelian-dialectic/
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touch
of enlightenment?
On 18.09.23 1:16, Cursitor Doom wrote:
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touchNO!!!!!!!
of enlightenment?
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 17:23:55 +0200, Sjouke Burry <burrynu...@ppllaanneett.nnll> wrote:
On 18.09.23 1:16, Cursitor Doom wrote:
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touchNO!!!!!!!
of enlightenment?
That's the perfect example of the unforgivable trait of willful ignorance. We are where we are precisely because of this kind of obduracy.
On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 17:23:55 +0200, Sjouke Burry ><burrynulnulfour@ppllaanneett.nnll> wrote:
On 18.09.23 1:16, Cursitor Doom wrote:
For those of you despairing of mankind's future, may I bring a touchNO!!!!!!!
of enlightenment?
That's the perfect example of the unforgivable trait of willful
ignorance. We are where we are precisely because of this kind of
obduracy.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 95:40:57 |
| Calls: | 6,719 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 12,252 |
| Messages: | 5,359,374 |
| Posted today: | 1 |