• US gun violence kills 123 per day By BELINDA ROBINSON in New York | Chi

    From a a@21:1/5 to All on Sat Sep 16 11:56:33 2023
    US gun violence kills 123 per day
    By BELINDA ROBINSON in New York | China Daily Global | Updated: 2023-09-15 08:06
    Mark Braden (center), whose son Daniel was killed in the Sandy Hook school shooting, hugs another attendee during an event calling for action on preventing gun violence on Wednesday in Washington, DC. WIN MCNAMEE/AFP

    Gun violence has killed 123 people per day in the United States this year with the total deaths including 1,079 teenagers and 216 children, figures from the Gun Violence Archive showed.

    US President Joe Biden renewed his calls for Congress to pass more gun control in July after a spate of mass shootings. But, in contrast, conservative politicians have pushed for more gun rights nationwide.

    In Kentucky, Ohio, Nebraska, Texas and Virginia this year, Republicans have advocated for removing background checks, getting rid of red-flag laws and minimizing gun-free zones that limit where people can carry a firearm around others in public.

    There were 30,235 deaths involving a gun as of Sept 1. At least 13,405 were homicides, murders or unintentional shootings. The majority, at 16,830 or 69 per day, were suicides by gun, the archive found.

    Some states had far more suicides by gun than others, including Texas, California, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Illinois and Louisiana.

    In two of these states — Texas and Georgia — Republican lawmakers have sought to have gun rights expanded while considering some gun control.

    Additionally, the nation has had 498 mass shootings as of mid-September.

    In Texas, there are ongoing calls to raise the minimum age for a person to purchase the assault-style weapon often used in mass shootings.

    It comes over a year after an 18-year-old gunman shot 19 students and two teachers at the Robb Elementary School in May 2022.

    Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott, a staunch gun rights advocate, believes raising the age would be "unconstitutional".

    Abbott and other right-wing politicians hold dear the Second Amendment, which gives all US people the "right… to keep and bear arms". They also oppose any interference from the federal government, say experts.

    Carl T. Bogus, professor of law at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island, told China Daily: "We are a two-party system, and the Republican Party considers the gun lobby to be an essential component of its political coalition."

    In at least 25 states, legal gun owners do not need a permit to carry a handgun in many public places. The number of states that have this law in place has risen since 2020, when only 16 states allowed it.

    Abbott signed a law in 2021 allowing for "permitless carry", which enables residents of the state age 21 and older to carry handguns without a license or training.

    He warned: "Politicians from the federal level to the local level have threatened to take guns from law-abiding citizens — but we will not let that happen in Texas."

    In April 2022, Georgia followed Texas in eliminating the need for a permit to conceal or openly carry a firearm.

    Monumental moment

    The move was hailed as "a monumental moment for the Second Amendment" by the National Rifle Association, or NRA, which remains a powerful gun rights advocacy group.

    "Half the country now rightfully recognizes the fundamental right to carry a firearm for self-defense as enshrined in our Constitution — as opposed to a government privilege that citizens must ask permission to exercise," Jason Ouimet, executive
    director of NRA's Institute for Legislative Action, said in a statement.

    Last year, the Supreme Court, which has more conservative judges than liberal, expanded gun rights.

    It also struck down a century-old New York gun law that required people to obtain a license to carry a gun outside their homes.

    The US has more guns than people with approximately 390 million firearms in circulation in 2018 — compared to a population of 331.9 million people — according to the Small Arms Survey, a Swiss-based research project.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From a a@21:1/5 to All on Sat Sep 16 19:07:15 2023


    Darius the Dumb has posted yet one more #veryStupidByLowIQaa article.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to a a on Sat Sep 16 12:43:04 2023
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 2:56:37 PM UTC-4, a a wrote:
    US gun violence kills 123 per day
    By BELINDA ROBINSON in New York | China Daily Global | Updated: 2023-09-15 08:06
    Mark Braden (center), whose son Daniel was killed in the Sandy Hook school shooting, hugs another attendee during an event calling for action on preventing gun violence on Wednesday in Washington, DC. WIN MCNAMEE/AFP

    Gun violence has killed 123 people per day in the United States this year with the total deaths including 1,079 teenagers and 216 children, figures from the Gun Violence Archive showed.

    US President Joe Biden renewed his calls for Congress to pass more gun control in July after a spate of mass shootings. But, in contrast, conservative politicians have pushed for more gun rights nationwide.

    In Kentucky, Ohio, Nebraska, Texas and Virginia this year, Republicans have advocated for removing background checks, getting rid of red-flag laws and minimizing gun-free zones that limit where people can carry a firearm around others in public.

    There were 30,235 deaths involving a gun as of Sept 1. At least 13,405 were homicides, murders or unintentional shootings. The majority, at 16,830 or 69 per day, were suicides by gun, the archive found.

    Some states had far more suicides by gun than others, including Texas, California, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Illinois and Louisiana.

    In two of these states — Texas and Georgia — Republican lawmakers have sought to have gun rights expanded while considering some gun control.

    Additionally, the nation has had 498 mass shootings as of mid-September.

    In Texas, there are ongoing calls to raise the minimum age for a person to purchase the assault-style weapon often used in mass shootings.

    It comes over a year after an 18-year-old gunman shot 19 students and two teachers at the Robb Elementary School in May 2022.

    Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott, a staunch gun rights advocate, believes raising the age would be "unconstitutional".

    Abbott and other right-wing politicians hold dear the Second Amendment, which gives all US people the "right… to keep and bear arms". They also oppose any interference from the federal government, say experts.

    Carl T. Bogus, professor of law at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island, told China Daily: "We are a two-party system, and the Republican Party considers the gun lobby to be an essential component of its political coalition."

    In at least 25 states, legal gun owners do not need a permit to carry a handgun in many public places. The number of states that have this law in place has risen since 2020, when only 16 states allowed it.

    Abbott signed a law in 2021 allowing for "permitless carry", which enables residents of the state age 21 and older to carry handguns without a license or training.

    He warned: "Politicians from the federal level to the local level have threatened to take guns from law-abiding citizens — but we will not let that happen in Texas."

    In April 2022, Georgia followed Texas in eliminating the need for a permit to conceal or openly carry a firearm.

    Monumental moment

    The move was hailed as "a monumental moment for the Second Amendment" by the National Rifle Association, or NRA, which remains a powerful gun rights advocacy group.

    "Half the country now rightfully recognizes the fundamental right to carry a firearm for self-defense as enshrined in our Constitution — as opposed to a government privilege that citizens must ask permission to exercise," Jason Ouimet, executive
    director of NRA's Institute for Legislative Action, said in a statement.

    Last year, the Supreme Court, which has more conservative judges than liberal, expanded gun rights.

    It also struck down a century-old New York gun law that required people to obtain a license to carry a gun outside their homes.

    The US has more guns than people with approximately 390 million firearms in circulation in 2018 — compared to a population of 331.9 million people — according to the Small Arms Survey, a Swiss-based research project.

    Misapplied and faked statistics.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to All on Sat Sep 16 14:59:47 2023
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <manta103g@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    US gun violence kills 123 per day
    By BELINDA ROBINSON in New York | China Daily Global | Updated: 2023-09-15 08:06
    Mark Braden (center), whose son Daniel was killed in the Sandy Hook school shooting, hugs another attendee during an event calling for action on preventing gun violence on Wednesday in Washington, DC. WIN MCNAMEE/AFP

    Gun violence has killed 123 people per day in the United States this year with the total deaths including 1,079 teenagers and 216 children, figures from the Gun Violence Archive showed.

    US President Joe Biden renewed his calls for Congress to pass more gun control in July after a spate of mass shootings. But, in contrast, conservative politicians have pushed for more gun rights nationwide.

    In Kentucky, Ohio, Nebraska, Texas and Virginia this year, Republicans have advocated for removing background checks, getting rid of red-flag laws and minimizing gun-free zones that limit where people can carry a firearm around others in public.

    There were 30,235 deaths involving a gun as of Sept 1. At least 13,405 were homicides, murders or unintentional shootings. The majority, at 16,830 or 69 per day, were suicides by gun, the archive found.

    Some states had far more suicides by gun than others, including Texas, California, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Illinois and Louisiana.

    In two of these states — Texas and Georgia — Republican lawmakers have sought to have gun rights expanded while considering some gun control.

    Additionally, the nation has had 498 mass shootings as of mid-September.

    In Texas, there are ongoing calls to raise the minimum age for a person to purchase the assault-style weapon often used in mass shootings.

    It comes over a year after an 18-year-old gunman shot 19 students and two teachers at the Robb Elementary School in May 2022.

    Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott, a staunch gun rights advocate, believes raising the age would be "unconstitutional".

    Abbott and other right-wing politicians hold dear the Second Amendment, which gives all US people the "right… to keep and bear arms". They also oppose any interference from the federal government, say experts.

    Carl T. Bogus, professor of law at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island, told China Daily: "We are a two-party system, and the Republican Party considers the gun lobby to be an essential component of its political coalition."

    In at least 25 states, legal gun owners do not need a permit to carry a handgun in many public places. The number of states that have this law in place has risen since 2020, when only 16 states allowed it.

    Abbott signed a law in 2021 allowing for "permitless carry", which enables residents of the state age 21 and older to carry handguns without a license or training.

    He warned: "Politicians from the federal level to the local level have threatened to take guns from law-abiding citizens — but we will not let that happen in Texas."

    In April 2022, Georgia followed Texas in eliminating the need for a permit to conceal or openly carry a firearm.

    Monumental moment

    The move was hailed as "a monumental moment for the Second Amendment" by the National Rifle Association, or NRA, which remains a powerful gun rights advocacy group.

    "Half the country now rightfully recognizes the fundamental right to carry a firearm for self-defense as enshrined in our Constitution — as opposed to a government privilege that citizens must ask permission to exercise," Jason Ouimet, executive
    director of NRA's Institute for Legislative Action, said in a statement.

    Last year, the Supreme Court, which has more conservative judges than liberal, expanded gun rights.

    It also struck down a century-old New York gun law that required people to obtain a license to carry a gun outside their homes.


    The Constitution says that the people may keep and bear arms.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jim whitby@21:1/5 to John Larkin on Sun Sep 17 00:05:31 2023
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 14:59:47 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <manta103g@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    US gun violence kills 123 per day By BELINDA ROBINSON in New York |
    China Daily Global | Updated: 2023-09-15 08:06 Mark Braden (center),
    whose son Daniel was killed in the Sandy Hook school shooting, hugs
    another attendee during an event calling for action on preventing gun >>violence on Wednesday in Washington, DC. WIN MCNAMEE/AFP

    Gun violence has killed 123 people per day in the United States this
    year with the total deaths including 1,079 teenagers and 216 children, >>figures from the Gun Violence Archive showed.

    US President Joe Biden renewed his calls for Congress to pass more gun >>control in July after a spate of mass shootings. But, in contrast, >>conservative politicians have pushed for more gun rights nationwide.

    In Kentucky, Ohio, Nebraska, Texas and Virginia this year, Republicans
    have advocated for removing background checks, getting rid of red-flag
    laws and minimizing gun-free zones that limit where people can carry a >>firearm around others in public.

    There were 30,235 deaths involving a gun as of Sept 1. At least 13,405
    were homicides, murders or unintentional shootings. The majority, at
    16,830 or 69 per day, were suicides by gun, the archive found.

    Some states had far more suicides by gun than others, including Texas, >>California, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Illinois and Louisiana.

    In two of these states — Texas and Georgia — Republican lawmakers have >>sought to have gun rights expanded while considering some gun control.

    Additionally, the nation has had 498 mass shootings as of mid-September.

    In Texas, there are ongoing calls to raise the minimum age for a person
    to purchase the assault-style weapon often used in mass shootings.

    It comes over a year after an 18-year-old gunman shot 19 students and
    two teachers at the Robb Elementary School in May 2022.

    Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott, a staunch gun rights advocate, >>believes raising the age would be "unconstitutional".

    Abbott and other right-wing politicians hold dear the Second Amendment, >>which gives all US people the "rightÂ… to keep and bear arms". They also >>oppose any interference from the federal government, say experts.

    Carl T. Bogus, professor of law at Roger Williams University in Rhode >>Island, told China Daily: "We are a two-party system, and the Republican >>Party considers the gun lobby to be an essential component of its
    political coalition."

    In at least 25 states, legal gun owners do not need a permit to carry a >>handgun in many public places. The number of states that have this law
    in place has risen since 2020, when only 16 states allowed it.

    Abbott signed a law in 2021 allowing for "permitless carry", which
    enables residents of the state age 21 and older to carry handguns
    without a license or training.

    He warned: "Politicians from the federal level to the local level have >>threatened to take guns from law-abiding citizens — but we will not let >>that happen in Texas."

    In April 2022, Georgia followed Texas in eliminating the need for a
    permit to conceal or openly carry a firearm.

    Monumental moment

    The move was hailed as "a monumental moment for the Second Amendment" by >>the National Rifle Association, or NRA, which remains a powerful gun
    rights advocacy group.

    "Half the country now rightfully recognizes the fundamental right to
    carry a firearm for self-defense as enshrined in our Constitution — as >>opposed to a government privilege that citizens must ask permission to >>exercise," Jason Ouimet, executive director of NRA's Institute for >>Legislative Action, said in a statement.

    Last year, the Supreme Court, which has more conservative judges than >>liberal, expanded gun rights.

    It also struck down a century-old New York gun law that required people
    to obtain a license to carry a gun outside their homes.


    The Constitution says that the people may keep and bear arms.

    Guns don't kill prople.
    People kill people.



    --
    Never trust an operating system.
    ----------------------
    Mageia release 9 (Official) for x86_64
    6.4.9-desktop-4.mga9 unknown
    ----------------------

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to jim whitby on Sat Sep 16 20:36:29 2023
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:05:40 AM UTC+10, jim whitby wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 14:59:47 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:

    Guns don't kill people.
    People kill people.

    But if nut cases don't have access to guns they find it a lot harder to kill people and much harder to kill many people at once.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to John Larkin on Sat Sep 16 20:33:40 2023
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:00:11 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:

    <snip>

    The Constitution says that the people may keep and bear arms.

    https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/amendments/amendment-ii

    puts it in the context of a well-regulated militia. It wasn't clearly worded. and the US gun industry has taken it as an excuse to sell many more guns that the country needs, to people who shouldn't have them and clearly aren't careful enough about using
    them.

    It's a disgraceful political scandal and kills a whole lot of people prematurely, mostly by making suicide a little too easy, but there are worse mental diseases than depression and shooting lots of other people all at once is excessively popular in the
    US.

    --
    Bil Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Sun Sep 17 05:47:23 2023
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:33:45 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:00:11 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
    <snip>
    The Constitution says that the people may keep and bear arms.
    https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/amendments/amendment-ii

    puts it in the context of a well-regulated militia. It wasn't clearly worded. and the US gun industry has taken it as an excuse to sell many more guns that the country needs, to people who shouldn't have them and clearly aren't careful enough about
    using them.

    The 'well-regulated' attribute is very plainly stated and well understood in 18th century English language to mean high performance. The very idea of militia entails creating a fighting force on very short notice without the benefit of basic training.
    Its members are expected to hit the ground running as they say. That's not going to happen if the recruitment pool don't have experience and proficiency with guns. This belief still holds true to this day. You might investigate the distribution of highly
    expert marksmen and snipers in modern militaries. You won't find many who haven't been using firearms since childhood.

    The real culprit in the more notorious senseless mass killings committed by people with mental illness, is mismanagement, if not outright abuse, of psychoactive drug prescriptions and negligent case handling.


    It's a disgraceful political scandal and kills a whole lot of people prematurely, mostly by making suicide a little too easy, but there are worse mental diseases than depression and shooting lots of other people all at once is excessively popular in
    the US.

    Baloney.


    --
    Bil Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Sun Sep 17 07:18:15 2023
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 10:47:28 PM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:33:45 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:00:11 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
    <snip>
    The Constitution says that the people may keep and bear arms.
    https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/amendments/amendment-ii

    puts it in the context of a well-regulated militia. It wasn't clearly worded. and the US gun industry has taken it as an excuse to sell many more guns that the country needs, to people who shouldn't have them and clearly aren't careful enough about
    using them.

    The 'well-regulated' attribute is very plainly stated and well understood in 18th century English language to mean high performance. The very idea of militia entails creating a fighting force on very short notice without the benefit of basic training.

    Total rubbish. Militia groups were long established parts of their communities, and widely exploited by rich people to show off the fact that they could afford military grade weapons.

    Rembrandt's "Night Watch" is a group portrait of a Dutch militia

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Night_Watch

    The US equivalents couldn't afford that quality of artist.

    Its members are expected to hit the ground running as they say.

    They were expected to have drilled together regularly so that there could be moved around a battle-field as a coherent group or radpidly organised into skirmish line.

    The weren't nearly as good as regular soldiers, and it took George Washington a long time to get his colonial army up to the point where they could win occasional battles with British regular troops,
    but who do you think were Paul Revere's "minute men"? You are depressingly ignorant.

    That's not going to happen if the recruitment pool don't have experience and proficiency with guns. This belief still holds true to this day. You might investigate the distribution of highly expert marksmen and snipers in modern militaries. You won't
    find many who haven't been using firearms since childhood.

    The real culprit in the more notorious senseless mass killings committed by people with mental illness, is mismanagement, if not outright abuse, of psychoactive drug prescriptions and negligent case handling.

    But if they can't get their hands on guns they kill many fewer people.

    It's a disgraceful political scandal and kills a whole lot of people prematurely, mostly by making suicide a little too easy, but there are worse mental diseases than depression and shooting lots of other people all at once is excessively popular in
    the US.

    Baloney.

    Look at the statistics.

    --
    Bil Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Michael Terrell@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Sun Sep 17 08:11:34 2023
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:47:28 AM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:33:45 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:00:11 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
    <snip>
    The Constitution says that the people may keep and bear arms.
    https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/amendments/amendment-ii

    puts it in the context of a well-regulated militia. It wasn't clearly worded. and the US gun industry has taken it as an excuse to sell many more guns that the country needs, to people who shouldn't have them and clearly aren't careful enough about
    using them.
    The 'well-regulated' attribute is very plainly stated and well understood in 18th century English language to mean high performance. The very idea of militia entails creating a fighting force on very short notice without the benefit of basic training.
    Its members are expected to hit the ground running as they say. That's not going to happen if the recruitment pool don't have experience and proficiency with guns. This belief still holds true to this day. You might investigate the distribution of highly
    expert marksmen and snipers in modern militaries. You won't find many who haven't been using firearms since childhood.

    The real culprit in the more notorious senseless mass killings committed by people with mental illness, is mismanagement, if not outright abuse, of psychoactive drug prescriptions and negligent case handling.

    It's a disgraceful political scandal and kills a whole lot of people prematurely, mostly by making suicide a little too easy, but there are worse mental diseases than depression and shooting lots of other people all at once is excessively popular in
    the US.
    Baloney.


    --
    Bil Sloman, Sydney

    I learned to shoot, at age 10 with a .22 rifle at Boy Scout Camp. Ten years later I was handed a M16 during Basic Training, to qualify in the US Army. It was damaged, and the barrel was worn so badly that the rifling was completely worn away. It was
    supposed to have a new barrel installed,, but they didn't get the parts on time. I hadn't fired anything in the intervening decade, yet I hit 20 out of 20 targets with it. It fired slightly upward and about ten degrees to the right. The Range Instructor
    was furious. He grabbed it from me, "Your target is over here!. He emptied two magazines, and didn't hit anything. I put in my last magazine and fired the 20 rounds. One missed the target, but one was tumbling so bad that it hit two targets. He stomped
    away, yelling "That weapon is defective!" I just laughed at him. It was like playing pool with a warped cue stick.

    I didn't have to re-qualify until two weeks before my Active Duty ended. I was handed a brand new M16, still covered in Cosmoline. (Ts was before they were all converted to Single or Semi Automatic modes only. You could operate singe, triple or fyll auto,
    but that mode wasted a lot of ammo, and caused excessive wear on rifles. Some early M16 parts were made by the toy company, Mattel, since they were the most experienced manufacturer of injection molded hard plastic parts at the time. Harrison Radiator, (
    A division of General Motors) made a lot of the receivers and other precision machined parts.

    My favorites were the belt fed machine gun, and the M72, Light Antitank weapon. A disposable 26 ounce weapon that could blow the tread off of a moving enemy tank.

    The Thermite grenades were cool, as well. To demonstrate it, they set one on top of an old Jeep engine and let it burn a hole all the way through, until the grenade fell out of the bottom while still burning.

    Sloman certainly isn't mentally stable enough to ever be allowed to own a gun of any type. He belongs in a country where they treat everyone like mindless children. I wouldn't trust him with a pocket knife because he's always flying off the handle when
    someone points out his mistakes..

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Michael Terrell on Sun Sep 17 08:35:40 2023
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 1:11:40 AM UTC+10, Michael Terrell wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:47:28 AM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:33:45 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:00:11 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:

    <snip>

    Sloman certainly isn't mentally stable enough to ever be allowed to own a gun of any type.

    I'm not mentally unstable enough to want to own one.

    The only one I've ever fired was standard Australian army 0.303 calibre single shot rifle when I was an army cadet at school. It had had been sleeved down to 0.22 calibre so it was rather heavy, but that was what we used at the rifle range. As far as I
    can remember I hit the target and didn't hit anything else.

    Many years later I found myself firing a Dutch cross bow at a target - I been dragged into an outing with my university co-workers and we all went to some village which had stuck with the cross-bow for their militia when richer villages had gone over to
    muskets. Again, I hit the target and didn't hit anything else

    He belongs in a country where they treat everyone like mindless children.

    Far from it. If you need a gun you can get a gun license. Lots of farmers do. Mindless children can't (unlike the US).

    I wouldn't trust him with a pocket knife because he's always flying off the handle when someone points out his mistakes..

    I get irritated when people falsely claim I've made a mistake. I'm much less worried when somebody picks me up on a real mistake, but it doesn't happen often. Mike Terrell can't tell the difference.

    My parents trusted me with edged tools from an early age. I've got two scars from when they slipped, but I've done a lot of woodworking, and there 's not a lot of blood on the pieces that are still spread around the house.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Flyguy@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Sun Sep 17 21:34:09 2023
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:35:46 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 1:11:40 AM UTC+10, Michael Terrell wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:47:28 AM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:33:45 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:00:11 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:

    <snip>
    Sloman certainly isn't mentally stable enough to ever be allowed to own a gun of any type.
    I'm not mentally unstable enough to want to own one.

    At least you know your limitations, even though you don't know why.


    The only one I've ever fired was standard Australian army 0.303 calibre single shot rifle when I was an army cadet at school. It had had been sleeved down to 0.22 calibre so it was rather heavy, but that was what we used at the rifle range. As far as I
    can remember I hit the target and didn't hit anything else.

    Many years later I found myself firing a Dutch cross bow at a target - I been dragged into an outing with my university co-workers and we all went to some village which had stuck with the cross-bow for their militia when richer villages had gone over
    to muskets. Again, I hit the target and didn't hit anything else
    He belongs in a country where they treat everyone like mindless children.
    Far from it. If you need a gun you can get a gun license. Lots of farmers do. Mindless children can't (unlike the US).
    I wouldn't trust him with a pocket knife because he's always flying off the handle when someone points out his mistakes..
    I get irritated when people falsely claim I've made a mistake. I'm much less worried when somebody picks me up on a real mistake, but it doesn't happen often. Mike Terrell can't tell the difference.

    It happens all the time - I only point out a few of them, like thinking that NUKING and FIREBOMBING your OWN COUNTRY is a good idea.


    My parents trusted me with edged tools from an early age. I've got two scars from when they slipped, but I've done a lot of woodworking, and there 's not a lot of blood on the pieces that are still spread around the house.

    Most of your scars aren't visible - they are in your head.


    --
    Bozo Bill Slowman, Sydney

    Defensive gun use (DGU) in the US occurs between 150 and 6500 times PER DAY, with the most likely number around 800.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_gun_use

    Bozo's Sewage Sweeper

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Flyguy on Sun Sep 17 22:11:15 2023
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 2:34:14 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:35:46 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 1:11:40 AM UTC+10, Michael Terrell wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:47:28 AM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:33:45 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:00:11 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:

    <snip>
    Sloman certainly isn't mentally stable enough to ever be allowed to own a gun of any type.

    I'm not mentally unstable enough to want to own one.

    At least you know your limitations, even though you don't know why.

    I don't have anybody, or anything, that I need to shoot. If you weren't a anonymous troll you could be pest species that needed to be culled, but you probably look enough like a human being that this would upset people.

    The only one I've ever fired was standard Australian army 0.303 calibre single shot rifle when I was an army cadet at school. It had had been sleeved down to 0.22 calibre so it was rather heavy, but that was what we used at the rifle range. As far as
    I can remember I hit the target and didn't hit anything else.

    Many years later I found myself firing a Dutch cross bow at a target - I been dragged into an outing with my university co-workers and we all went to some village which had stuck with the cross-bow for their militia when richer villages had gone over
    to muskets. Again, I hit the target and didn't hit anything else.

    He belongs in a country where they treat everyone like mindless children.

    Far from it. If you need a gun you can get a gun license. Lots of farmers do. Mindless children can't (unlike the US).

    I wouldn't trust him with a pocket knife because he's always flying off the handle when someone points out his mistakes.

    I get irritated when people falsely claim I've made a mistake. I'm much less worried when somebody picks me up on a real mistake, but it doesn't happen often. Mike Terrell can't tell the difference.

    It happens all the time - I only point out a few of them, like thinking that NUKING and FIREBOMBING your OWN COUNTRY is a good idea.

    I don't. The mistake that let you think I do - or that you can get away with making that fatuous claim - is all yours.

    My parents trusted me with edged tools from an early age. I've got two scars from when they slipped, but I've done a lot of woodworking, and there 's not a lot of blood on the pieces that are still spread around the house.

    Most of your scars aren't visible - they are in your head.

    There are two visible scars on my head (actually my face) - from field hockey. They didn't create any cognitive problems - of the kind you struggle with - or any other. I went on to get a Ph.D. after I'd got them.

    Defensive gun use (DGU) in the US occurs between 150 and 6500 times PER DAY, with the most likely number around 800.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_gun_use

    The main thrust of that report is that your numbers are implausible fantasies, concocted to keep the NRA happy. You capacity for misunderstanding evidence blinds you to this

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Mon Sep 18 05:32:56 2023
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 10:18:20 AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 10:47:28 PM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:33:45 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:00:11 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
    <snip>
    The Constitution says that the people may keep and bear arms.
    https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/amendments/amendment-ii

    puts it in the context of a well-regulated militia. It wasn't clearly worded. and the US gun industry has taken it as an excuse to sell many more guns that the country needs, to people who shouldn't have them and clearly aren't careful enough about
    using them.

    The 'well-regulated' attribute is very plainly stated and well understood in 18th century English language to mean high performance. The very idea of militia entails creating a fighting force on very short notice without the benefit of basic training.
    Total rubbish. Militia groups were long established parts of their communities, and widely exploited by rich people to show off the fact that they could afford military grade weapons.

    Not in America...


    Rembrandt's "Night Watch" is a group portrait of a Dutch militia

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Night_Watch

    The US equivalents couldn't afford that quality of artist.
    Its members are expected to hit the ground running as they say.
    They were expected to have drilled together regularly so that there could be moved around a battle-field as a coherent group or radpidly organised into skirmish line.

    The weren't nearly as good as regular soldiers, and it took George Washington a long time to get his colonial army up to the point where they could win occasional battles with British regular troops,

    The one major true battle fought between the American and British was Saratoga, the humiliating defeat of Burgoyne's Army.

    Washington couldn't get anywhere with the British army under Howe solidly entrenched in New York City. Howe lasted until their leisurely withdrawal by the British navy at the very end. Washington was lucky to overrun an isolated garrison of two, but all-
    in-all was doing absolutely nothing to end that war.

    Cornwallis was eventually cornered and surrendered his army in Yorktown, Most of the fighting was done by the French under Rochambeau and his 6,000 French regulars in concert with De Grace interdicting the British by sea. Washington had a sizable
    presence with a force of 20,000, most of whom were drop-ins who joined his march south.


    but who do you think were Paul Revere's "minute men"? You are depressingly ignorant.

    You do understand the subject matter is militia as it existed in early America.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militia_(United_States) ( They're mainly talking about using militia for genocide of the indigenous. )

    That's not going to happen if the recruitment pool don't have experience and proficiency with guns. This belief still holds true to this day. You might investigate the distribution of highly expert marksmen and snipers in modern militaries. You won't
    find many who haven't been using firearms since childhood.

    The real culprit in the more notorious senseless mass killings committed by people with mental illness, is mismanagement, if not outright abuse, of psychoactive drug prescriptions and negligent case handling.
    But if they can't get their hands on guns they kill many fewer people.
    It's a disgraceful political scandal and kills a whole lot of people prematurely, mostly by making suicide a little too easy, but there are worse mental diseases than depression and shooting lots of other people all at once is excessively popular
    in the US.

    Baloney.
    Look at the statistics.

    --
    Bil Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Mon Sep 18 10:35:54 2023
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 10:33:01 PM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 10:18:20 AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 10:47:28 PM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:33:45 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:00:11 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:
    <snip>
    The Constitution says that the people may keep and bear arms.
    https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/amendments/amendment-ii

    puts it in the context of a well-regulated militia. It wasn't clearly worded. and the US gun industry has taken it as an excuse to sell many more guns that the country needs, to people who shouldn't have them and clearly aren't careful enough
    about using them.

    The 'well-regulated' attribute is very plainly stated and well understood in 18th century English language to mean high performance. The very idea of militia entails creating a fighting force on very short notice without the benefit of basic
    training.
    Total rubbish. Militia groups were long established parts of their communities, and widely exploited by rich people to show off the fact that they could afford military grade weapons.

    Not in America...

    We all known that Americans like to think of themselves as modest and unpretentious and never making exhibitions of themselves. It's all part of American exceptionalism. It's also rubbish.

    Rembrandt's "Night Watch" is a group portrait of a Dutch militia

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Night_Watch

    The US equivalents couldn't afford that quality of artist.

    Its members are expected to hit the ground running as they say.

    They were expected to have drilled together regularly so that they could be moved around a battle-field as a coherent group or rapidly organised into a skirmish line.

    The weren't nearly as good as regular soldiers, and it took George Washington a long time to get his colonial army up to the point where they could win occasional battles with British regular troops,

    The one major true battle fought between the American and British was Saratoga, the humiliating defeat of Burgoyne's Army.

    Washington couldn't get anywhere with the British army under Howe solidly entrenched in New York City. Howe lasted until their leisurely withdrawal by the British navy at the very end. Washington was lucky to overrun an isolated garrison of two, but
    all-in-all was doing absolutely nothing to end that war.

    Cornwallis was eventually cornered and surrendered his army in Yorktown, Most of the fighting was done by the French under Rochambeau and his 6,000 French regulars in concert with De Grace interdicting the British by sea. Washington had a sizable
    presence with a force of 20,000, most of whom were drop-ins who joined his march south.

    but who do you think were Paul Revere's "minute men"? You are depressingly ignorant.

    You do understand the subject matter is militia as it existed in early America.

    That's what I'd spent time spelling out. It wasn't wildly different from militias anywhere else.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Militia_(United_States) ( They're mainly talking about using militia for genocide of the indigenous. )

    The American Indians of the period were a tolerably sophisticated bunch, and happy to form alliances with the various European colonists when it suited them. Washington doesn't seem to have been into genocide, but he did end up owning a lot of property
    that had belonged to Indian tribes, that English legal system wouldn't have let him claim for himself.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finances_of_George_Washington

    That's not going to happen if the recruitment pool don't have experience and proficiency with guns. This belief still holds true to this day. You might investigate the distribution of highly expert marksmen and snipers in modern militaries. You won'
    t find many who haven't been using firearms since childhood.

    I wouldn't bother. The mechanics of maintaining and firing a modern breech-loading rifled gun don't have much relevance to local militias of the war of independence.

    One was developed and deployed by the British, but didn't see much use

    https://allthingsliberty.com/2018/12/patrick-ferguson-and-his-rifle/

    The real culprit in the more notorious senseless mass killings committed by people with mental illness, is mismanagement, if not outright abuse, of psychoactive drug prescriptions and negligent case handling.

    But if they can't get their hands on guns they kill many fewer people.

    It's a disgraceful political scandal and kills a whole lot of people prematurely, mostly by making suicide a little too easy, but there are worse mental diseases than depression and shooting lots of other people all at once is excessively popular
    in the US.

    Baloney.
    Look at the statistics.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Flyguy@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Mon Sep 18 22:07:27 2023
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 10:11:21 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 2:34:14 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:35:46 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 1:11:40 AM UTC+10, Michael Terrell wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:47:28 AM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:33:45 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:00:11 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:

    <snip>
    Sloman certainly isn't mentally stable enough to ever be allowed to own a gun of any type.

    I'm not mentally unstable enough to want to own one.

    At least you know your limitations, even though you don't know why.
    I don't have anybody, or anything, that I need to shoot. If you weren't a anonymous troll you could be pest species that needed to be culled, but you probably look enough like a human being that this would upset people.
    The only one I've ever fired was standard Australian army 0.303 calibre single shot rifle when I was an army cadet at school. It had had been sleeved down to 0.22 calibre so it was rather heavy, but that was what we used at the rifle range. As far
    as I can remember I hit the target and didn't hit anything else.

    Many years later I found myself firing a Dutch cross bow at a target - I been dragged into an outing with my university co-workers and we all went to some village which had stuck with the cross-bow for their militia when richer villages had gone
    over to muskets. Again, I hit the target and didn't hit anything else.

    He belongs in a country where they treat everyone like mindless children.

    Far from it. If you need a gun you can get a gun license. Lots of farmers do. Mindless children can't (unlike the US).

    I wouldn't trust him with a pocket knife because he's always flying off the handle when someone points out his mistakes.

    I get irritated when people falsely claim I've made a mistake. I'm much less worried when somebody picks me up on a real mistake, but it doesn't happen often. Mike Terrell can't tell the difference.

    It happens all the time - I only point out a few of them, like thinking that NUKING and FIREBOMBING your OWN COUNTRY is a good idea.
    I don't. The mistake that let you think I do - or that you can get away with making that fatuous claim - is all yours.

    Yes, you FUCKING DO! You have recently reaffirmed you ABSURD backing of this ABSURD IDEA. Do I have to POST your OWN WORDS, you fucking IDIOT???

    My parents trusted me with edged tools from an early age. I've got two scars from when they slipped, but I've done a lot of woodworking, and there 's not a lot of blood on the pieces that are still spread around the house.

    Most of your scars aren't visible - they are in your head.
    There are two visible scars on my head (actually my face) - from field hockey. They didn't create any cognitive problems - of the kind you struggle with - or any other. I went on to get a Ph.D. after I'd got them.

    Your scars aren't visible - they are INSIDE YOUR DEMENTED MIND.'

    Defensive gun use (DGU) in the US occurs between 150 and 6500 times PER DAY, with the most likely number around 800.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_gun_use
    The main thrust of that report is that your numbers are implausible fantasies, concocted to keep the NRA happy. You capacity for misunderstanding evidence blinds you to this

    This is what you anti-gun fanatics want to think, but, as usual, you CAN'T ACCEPT THE TRUTH. Humans WILL kill each other with WHATEVER means available, and the most convenient is a simple CAR!
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12526679/Las-Vegas-hit-run-death-cyclist-Andreas-Probst.html


    --
    Bozo Bill Slowman, Sydney

    Bozo's Sewage Sweeper

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Flyguy on Tue Sep 19 00:34:14 2023
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 3:07:31 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 10:11:21 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 2:34:14 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:35:46 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 1:11:40 AM UTC+10, Michael Terrell wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:47:28 AM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:33:45 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:00:11 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:

    <snip>

    I get irritated when people falsely claim I've made a mistake. I'm much less worried when somebody picks me up on a real mistake, but it doesn't happen often. Mike Terrell can't tell the difference.

    It happens all the time - I only point out a few of them, like thinking that NUKING and FIREBOMBING your OWN COUNTRY is a good idea.

    I don't. The mistake that let you think I do - or that you can get away with making that fatuous claim - is all yours.

    Yes, you FUCKING DO! You have recently reaffirmed you ABSURD backing of this ABSURD IDEA. Do I have to POST your OWN WORDS, you fucking IDIOT???

    You really should. The difference between using nuclear explosives - Project Plowshare style - to make a mine inaccessible to an invader, and "nuking your won country" is pretty dramatic.

    The US set of some 35 nuclear explosions in it's own country while exploring the idea, and nobody has been prolsecuted for nuking your own country.\

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Plowshare

    <snip>

    Defensive gun use (DGU) in the US occurs between 150 and 6500 times PER DAY, with the most likely number around 800.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_gun_use

    The main thrust of that report is that your numbers are implausible fantasies, concocted to keep the NRA happy. You capacity for misunderstanding evidence blinds you to this.

    This is what you anti-gun fanatics want to think, but, as usual, you CAN'T ACCEPT THE TRUTH. Humans WILL kill each other with WHATEVER means available, and the most convenient is a simple CAR!

    The occasional psychopath will kill another human, and a few of them get lucky and kill several. Giving everybody guns so that they can kill anybody who looks like a psychopath to them isn't a way of minimising the number killed - far from it.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12526679/Las-Vegas-hit-run-death-cyclist-Andreas-Probst.html

    The Daily Mail exists to give right-wing lunatic like you your daily fix of indignation. It doesn't have anything useful to say, and never did.

    The appropriate response is to keep guns and cars out of the hands of dangerous psychopath - the US does have driving licenses but baulks at gun licenses.

    Picking dangerous psychopaths isn't easy - you are probably an obvious example, but less stupid people can hide it better. Fantasies about using your concealed-carry gun to kill dangerous criminals are a bit of a give-away

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sci.electronics.design@21:1/5 to Flyguy on Tue Sep 19 05:59:51 2023
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 1:07:31 AM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 10:11:21 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 2:34:14 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:35:46 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 1:11:40 AM UTC+10, Michael Terrell wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:47:28 AM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:33:45 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:00:11 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:

    <snip>
    Sloman certainly isn't mentally stable enough to ever be allowed to own a gun of any type.

    I'm not mentally unstable enough to want to own one.

    At least you know your limitations, even though you don't know why.
    I don't have anybody, or anything, that I need to shoot. If you weren't a anonymous troll you could be pest species that needed to be culled, but you probably look enough like a human being that this would upset people.
    The only one I've ever fired was standard Australian army 0.303 calibre single shot rifle when I was an army cadet at school. It had had been sleeved down to 0.22 calibre so it was rather heavy, but that was what we used at the rifle range. As
    far as I can remember I hit the target and didn't hit anything else.

    Many years later I found myself firing a Dutch cross bow at a target - I been dragged into an outing with my university co-workers and we all went to some village which had stuck with the cross-bow for their militia when richer villages had gone
    over to muskets. Again, I hit the target and didn't hit anything else.

    He belongs in a country where they treat everyone like mindless children.

    Far from it. If you need a gun you can get a gun license. Lots of farmers do. Mindless children can't (unlike the US).

    I wouldn't trust him with a pocket knife because he's always flying off the handle when someone points out his mistakes.

    I get irritated when people falsely claim I've made a mistake. I'm much less worried when somebody picks me up on a real mistake, but it doesn't happen often. Mike Terrell can't tell the difference.

    It happens all the time - I only point out a few of them, like thinking that NUKING and FIREBOMBING your OWN COUNTRY is a good idea.
    I don't. The mistake that let you think I do - or that you can get away with making that fatuous claim - is all yours.
    Yes, you FUCKING DO! You have recently reaffirmed you ABSURD backing of this ABSURD IDEA. Do I have to POST your OWN WORDS, you fucking IDIOT???
    My parents trusted me with edged tools from an early age. I've got two scars from when they slipped, but I've done a lot of woodworking, and there 's not a lot of blood on the pieces that are still spread around the house.

    Most of your scars aren't visible - they are in your head.
    There are two visible scars on my head (actually my face) - from field hockey. They didn't create any cognitive problems - of the kind you struggle with - or any other. I went on to get a Ph.D. after I'd got them.
    Your scars aren't visible - they are INSIDE YOUR DEMENTED MIND.'
    Defensive gun use (DGU) in the US occurs between 150 and 6500 times PER DAY, with the most likely number around 800.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_gun_use
    The main thrust of that report is that your numbers are implausible fantasies, concocted to keep the NRA happy. You capacity for misunderstanding evidence blinds you to this
    This is what you anti-gun fanatics want to think, but, as usual, you CAN'T ACCEPT THE TRUTH. Humans WILL kill each other with WHATEVER means available, and the most convenient is a simple CAR!
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12526679/Las-Vegas-hit-run-death-cyclist-Andreas-Probst.html

    That was juveniles joyriding in a stolen vehicle. They did not intend to kill the cyclist, they thought it would be funny to just bump him to the ground. The juveniles were morons and the cyclist was frail so a fatality was the result.




    --
    Bozo Bill Slowman, Sydney
    Bozo's Sewage Sweeper

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sci.electronics.design@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Tue Sep 19 05:56:52 2023
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 1:36:00 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:


    I wouldn't bother. The mechanics of maintaining and firing a modern breech-loading rifled gun don't have much relevance to local militias of the war of independence.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_rifle

    Daniel Morgan put together a company of riflemen using these weapons and deployed to the battle of Saratoga. There was an unwritten rule of warfare at the time that prohibited lowly non-commissioned officers from killing officers of the opposing force.
    Morgan was obsessed with hatred for the officer corps of the British army, and ordered his men to prioritize targeting and killing them, which they did with great proficiency, as in 500 meter shots made from tall trees.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgan%27s_Riflemen

    Seeing the ghastly wounds made by these large bore projectiles, the Hessians broke and ran. In a few instances their British officer handlers tried to stop them but were shot dead by the Hessians. It was quite a melee.


    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to All on Tue Sep 19 06:22:30 2023
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:56:57 PM UTC+10, sci.electronics.design wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 1:36:00 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:


    I wouldn't bother. The mechanics of maintaining and firing a modern breech-loading rifled gun don't have much relevance to local militias of the war of independence.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_rifle

    The long rifle wasn't a local militia weapon. It was specialised and expensive tool used by specialist marksmen,

    Daniel Morgan put together a company of riflemen using these weapons and deployed to the battle of Saratoga. There was an unwritten rule of warfare at the time that prohibited lowly non-commissioned officers from killing officers of the opposing force.
    Morgan was obsessed with hatred for the officer corps of the British army, and ordered his men to prioritize targeting and killing them, which they did with great proficiency, as in 500 meter shots made from tall trees.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgan%27s_Riflemen

    Seeing the ghastly wounds made by these large bore projectiles, the Hessians broke and ran. In a few instances their British officer handlers tried to stop them but were shot dead by the Hessians. It was quite a melee.

    There nothing quite like superior weapons used by people who know how to use them. Local militia typically didn't spend that kind on money on their weapons, nor spend the time required to get thoroughly proficient with them. Neither did the bulk of
    professional army units. The needle rifle didn't show up for another sixty years.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreyse_needle_gun

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sci.electronics.design@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Tue Sep 19 06:32:39 2023
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 9:22:36 AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:56:57 PM UTC+10, sci.electronics.design wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 1:36:00 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:


    I wouldn't bother. The mechanics of maintaining and firing a modern breech-loading rifled gun don't have much relevance to local militias of the war of independence.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_rifle
    The long rifle wasn't a local militia weapon. It was specialised and expensive tool used by specialist marksmen,

    I don't have definite numbers, but the long rifle was almost certainly standard issue for the Pennsylvania militias.

    In many other places, the militias were so ad hoc it was a BYOG ( bring your own gun ) operation. The more upscale hunters from the frontier states like Kentucky and Tennessee possessed the long rifle. They depended on the rifle to hunt game and avoid
    starvation, which is always a great motivator. The long rifle was not a 'war innovation', it was a hunting innovation.



    Daniel Morgan put together a company of riflemen using these weapons and deployed to the battle of Saratoga. There was an unwritten rule of warfare at the time that prohibited lowly non-commissioned officers from killing officers of the opposing
    force. Morgan was obsessed with hatred for the officer corps of the British army, and ordered his men to prioritize targeting and killing them, which they did with great proficiency, as in 500 meter shots made from tall trees.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgan%27s_Riflemen

    Seeing the ghastly wounds made by these large bore projectiles, the Hessians broke and ran. In a few instances their British officer handlers tried to stop them but were shot dead by the Hessians. It was quite a melee.
    There nothing quite like superior weapons used by people who know how to use them. Local militia typically didn't spend that kind on money on their weapons, nor spend the time required to get thoroughly proficient with them. Neither did the bulk of
    professional army units. The needle rifle didn't show up for another sixty years.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreyse_needle_gun

    Prior to mid-century, the maximum effective range of standard military rifles was 100 meter. The Minie ball projectile fired from rifled weapon increased it to 300 meter. That's a super good advantage over an opposing force that doesn't have them.


    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to All on Tue Sep 19 07:18:38 2023
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 11:32:45 PM UTC+10, sci.electronics.design wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 9:22:36 AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:56:57 PM UTC+10, sci.electronics.design wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 1:36:00 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:


    I wouldn't bother. The mechanics of maintaining and firing a modern breech-loading rifled gun don't have much relevance to local militias of the war of independence.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_rifle
    The long rifle wasn't a local militia weapon. It was specialised and expensive tool used by specialist marksmen,
    I don't have definite numbers, but the long rifle was almost certainly standard issue for the Pennsylvania militias.

    In many other places, the militias were so ad hoc it was a BYOG ( bring your own gun ) operation.

    That's the whole point about militias of the period. You had to have your own gun to get in. Back to the ancient Greeks, richer people who could afford proper arms and armour boosted their standing in the community by spending some of their money on
    enhancing their capacity to look as if they were capable of defending it.

    The more upscale hunters from the frontier states like Kentucky and Tennessee possessed the long rifle. They depended on the rifle to hunt game and avoid starvation, which is always a great motivator. The long rifle was not a 'war innovation', it was
    a hunting innovation.

    But hunting was more of a hobby than an avocations. People made money out fur trapping, but they used cheap snares rather than expensive weapons.

    Daniel Morgan put together a company of riflemen using these weapons and deployed to the battle of Saratoga. There was an unwritten rule of warfare at the time that prohibited lowly non-commissioned officers from killing officers of the opposing
    force. Morgan was obsessed with hatred for the officer corps of the British army, and ordered his men to prioritize targeting and killing them, which they did with great proficiency, as in 500 meter shots made from tall trees.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgan%27s_Riflemen

    Seeing the ghastly wounds made by these large bore projectiles, the Hessians broke and ran. In a few instances their British officer handlers tried to stop them but were shot dead by the Hessians. It was quite a melee.

    There nothing quite like superior weapons used by people who know how to use them. Local militia typically didn't spend that kind on money on their weapons, nor spend the time required to get thoroughly proficient with them. Neither did the bulk of
    professional army units. The needle rifle didn't show up for another sixty years.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreyse_needle_gun

    Prior to mid-century, the maximum effective range of standard military rifles was 100 meter. The Minie ball projectile fired from rifled weapon increased it to 300 meter. That's a super good advantage over an opposing force that doesn't have them.

    But rate of fire is what matters. Snipers don't win battles, and before good spectacles were accessible to infantry men, 300 metres was probably father away than most of them could distinguish a man from a shrub.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Tue Sep 19 14:47:20 2023
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:18:44 AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 11:32:45 PM UTC+10, sci.electronics.design wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 9:22:36 AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:56:57 PM UTC+10, sci.electronics.design wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 1:36:00 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:


    I wouldn't bother. The mechanics of maintaining and firing a modern breech-loading rifled gun don't have much relevance to local militias of the war of independence.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_rifle
    The long rifle wasn't a local militia weapon. It was specialised and expensive tool used by specialist marksmen,
    I don't have definite numbers, but the long rifle was almost certainly standard issue for the Pennsylvania militias.

    In many other places, the militias were so ad hoc it was a BYOG ( bring your own gun ) operation.
    That's the whole point about militias of the period. You had to have your own gun to get in. Back to the ancient Greeks, richer people who could afford proper arms and armour boosted their standing in the community by spending some of their money on
    enhancing their capacity to look as if they were capable of defending it.

    In the feudal period they also brought along a small army to accompany them.


    The more upscale hunters from the frontier states like Kentucky and Tennessee possessed the long rifle. They depended on the rifle to hunt game and avoid starvation, which is always a great motivator. The long rifle was not a 'war innovation', it was
    a hunting innovation.
    But hunting was more of a hobby than an avocations. People made money out fur trapping, but they used cheap snares rather than expensive weapons.

    Back in the day, hunting was a necessity. Grazing pastures for livestock were hard to come by in mountainous areas. The frontier was a lawless cesspool of in-humanity. It was absolutely necessary to own a gun for self-defense.


    Daniel Morgan put together a company of riflemen using these weapons and deployed to the battle of Saratoga. There was an unwritten rule of warfare at the time that prohibited lowly non-commissioned officers from killing officers of the opposing
    force. Morgan was obsessed with hatred for the officer corps of the British army, and ordered his men to prioritize targeting and killing them, which they did with great proficiency, as in 500 meter shots made from tall trees.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgan%27s_Riflemen

    Seeing the ghastly wounds made by these large bore projectiles, the Hessians broke and ran. In a few instances their British officer handlers tried to stop them but were shot dead by the Hessians. It was quite a melee.

    There nothing quite like superior weapons used by people who know how to use them. Local militia typically didn't spend that kind on money on their weapons, nor spend the time required to get thoroughly proficient with them. Neither did the bulk of
    professional army units. The needle rifle didn't show up for another sixty years.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreyse_needle_gun

    Prior to mid-century, the maximum effective range of standard military rifles was 100 meter. The Minie ball projectile fired from rifled weapon increased it to 300 meter. That's a super good advantage over an opposing force that doesn't have them.
    But rate of fire is what matters. Snipers don't win battles, and before good spectacles were accessible to infantry men, 300 metres was probably father away than most of them could distinguish a man from a shrub.

    The British weren't hiding behind shrubs.

    That depends. The British organized themselves into ranks that would alternately fire en masse upon the enemy positions. The American adversaries were more into hit and run, taking dispersed positions quickly abandoned. Planning their avenue of escape
    was as important as planning the attack itself.




    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Flyguy@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Tue Sep 19 19:28:35 2023
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 12:34:19 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 3:07:31 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 10:11:21 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 2:34:14 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:35:46 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 1:11:40 AM UTC+10, Michael Terrell wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:47:28 AM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:33:45 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:00:11 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:

    <snip>
    I get irritated when people falsely claim I've made a mistake. I'm much less worried when somebody picks me up on a real mistake, but it doesn't happen often. Mike Terrell can't tell the difference.

    It happens all the time - I only point out a few of them, like thinking that NUKING and FIREBOMBING your OWN COUNTRY is a good idea.

    I don't. The mistake that let you think I do - or that you can get away with making that fatuous claim - is all yours.

    Yes, you FUCKING DO! You have recently reaffirmed you ABSURD backing of this ABSURD IDEA. Do I have to POST your OWN WORDS, you fucking IDIOT???
    You really should. The difference between using nuclear explosives - Project Plowshare style - to make a mine inaccessible to an invader, and "nuking your won country" is pretty dramatic.

    The US set of some 35 nuclear explosions in it's own country while exploring the idea, and nobody has been prolsecuted for nuking your own country.\

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Plowshare

    <snip>
    Defensive gun use (DGU) in the US occurs between 150 and 6500 times PER DAY, with the most likely number around 800.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_gun_use

    The main thrust of that report is that your numbers are implausible fantasies, concocted to keep the NRA happy. You capacity for misunderstanding evidence blinds you to this.

    This is what you anti-gun fanatics want to think, but, as usual, you CAN'T ACCEPT THE TRUTH. Humans WILL kill each other with WHATEVER means available, and the most convenient is a simple CAR!
    The occasional psychopath will kill another human, and a few of them get lucky and kill several. Giving everybody guns so that they can kill anybody who looks like a psychopath to them isn't a way of minimising the number killed - far from it.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12526679/Las-Vegas-hit-run-death-cyclist-Andreas-Probst.html

    The Daily Mail exists to give right-wing lunatic like you your daily fix of indignation. It doesn't have anything useful to say, and never did.

    WTF are you saying, Bozo, that this crime DIDN'T occur?


    The appropriate response is to keep guns and cars out of the hands of dangerous psychopath - the US does have driving licenses but baulks at gun licenses.

    This crime shows that you DON'T need a gun to kill someone - a car or, better yet, a truck will do nicely. Knives are also useful for up close and personal murders.


    Picking dangerous psychopaths isn't easy - you are probably an obvious example, but less stupid people can hide it better. Fantasies about using your concealed-carry gun to kill dangerous criminals are a bit of a give-away

    LOL! I have held a top-secret security clearance; I seriously doubt that you have. Do you REALLY think they award those to psychopaths??? You, OTOH, have advocated clear psychopathic tendencies, like NUKING and FIREBOMBING YOUR OWN COUNTRY!!!!!


    --
    Bozo Bill Slowman, Sydney

    Bozo's Sewage Sweeper

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Tue Sep 19 20:40:49 2023
    On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 7:47:25 AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:18:44 AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 11:32:45 PM UTC+10, sci.electronics.design wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 9:22:36 AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:56:57 PM UTC+10, sci.electronics.design wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 1:36:00 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:


    I wouldn't bother. The mechanics of maintaining and firing a modern breech-loading rifled gun don't have much relevance to local militias of the war of independence.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_rifle

    The long rifle wasn't a local militia weapon. It was specialised and expensive tool used by specialist marksmen,
    I don't have definite numbers, but the long rifle was almost certainly standard issue for the Pennsylvania militias.

    In many other places, the militias were so ad hoc it was a BYOG ( bring your own gun ) operation.

    That's the whole point about militias of the period. You had to have your own gun to get in. Back to the ancient Greeks, richer people who could afford proper arms and armour boosted their standing in the community by spending some of their money on
    enhancing their capacity to look as if they were capable of defending it.

    In the feudal period they also brought along a small army to accompany them.

    That was the nobility, who were a professional military caste. The point about the militia was that they did other stuff for a living, but could be organised into a sort of miliatyr unit at short notice.

    The more upscale hunters from the frontier states like Kentucky and Tennessee possessed the long rifle. They depended on the rifle to hunt game and avoid starvation, which is always a great motivator. The long rifle was not a 'war innovation', it
    was a hunting innovation.

    But hunting was more of a hobby than an avocations. People made money out fur trapping, but they used cheap snares rather than expensive weapons.

    Back in the day, hunting was a necessity. Grazing pastures for livestock were hard to come by in mountainous areas. The frontier was a lawless cesspool of in-humanity. It was absolutely necessary to own a gun for self-defense.

    Ask the National Rifle Association. they'll tell you their preferred myth.

    Daniel Morgan put together a company of riflemen using these weapons and deployed to the battle of Saratoga. There was an unwritten rule of warfare at the time that prohibited lowly non-commissioned officers from killing officers of the
    opposing force. Morgan was obsessed with hatred for the officer corps of the British army, and ordered his men to prioritize targeting and killing them, which they did with great proficiency, as in 500 meter shots made from tall trees.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgan%27s_Riflemen

    Seeing the ghastly wounds made by these large bore projectiles, the Hessians broke and ran. In a few instances their British officer handlers tried to stop them but were shot dead by the Hessians. It was quite a melee.

    There nothing quite like superior weapons used by people who know how to use them. Local militia typically didn't spend that kind on money on their weapons, nor spend the time required to get thoroughly proficient with them. Neither did the bulk
    of professional army units. The needle rifle didn't show up for another sixty years.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreyse_needle_gun

    Prior to mid-century, the maximum effective range of standard military rifles was 100 meter. The Minie ball projectile fired from rifled weapon increased it to 300 meter. That's a super good advantage over an opposing force that doesn't have them.

    But rate of fire is what matters. Snipers don't win battles, and before good spectacles were accessible to infantry men, 300 metres was probably father away than most of them could distinguish a man from a shrub.

    The British weren't hiding behind shrubs.

    They did deploy in ranks, and shrubs made that difficult,

    That depends. The British organized themselves into ranks that would alternately fire en masse upon the enemy positions. The American adversaries were more into hit and run, taking dispersed positions quickly abandoned. Planning their avenue of escape
    was as important as planning the attack itself.

    That's guerilla warfare, that uses irregular forces, classically fast moving light infantry (which is a lot cheap[er than cavalary, if not as fast moving).

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Flyguy on Wed Sep 20 07:34:21 2023
    On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 12:28:41 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 12:34:19 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 3:07:31 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 10:11:21 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 2:34:14 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:35:46 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 1:11:40 AM UTC+10, Michael Terrell wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:47:28 AM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:33:45 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:00:11 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:

    <snip>
    I get irritated when people falsely claim I've made a mistake. I'm much less worried when somebody picks me up on a real mistake, but it doesn't happen often. Mike Terrell can't tell the difference.

    It happens all the time - I only point out a few of them, like thinking that NUKING and FIREBOMBING your OWN COUNTRY is a good idea.

    I don't. The mistake that let you think I do - or that you can get away with making that fatuous claim - is all yours.

    Yes, you FUCKING DO! You have recently reaffirmed you ABSURD backing of this ABSURD IDEA. Do I have to POST your OWN WORDS, you fucking IDIOT???

    You really should. The difference between using nuclear explosives - Project Plowshare style - to make a mine inaccessible to an invader, and "nuking your won country" is pretty dramatic.

    The US set of some 35 nuclear explosions in it's own country while exploring the idea, and nobody has been prolsecuted for nuking your own country.\

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Plowshare

    <snip>
    Defensive gun use (DGU) in the US occurs between 150 and 6500 times PER DAY, with the most likely number around 800.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_gun_use

    The main thrust of that report is that your numbers are implausible fantasies, concocted to keep the NRA happy. You capacity for misunderstanding evidence blinds you to this.

    This is what you anti-gun fanatics want to think, but, as usual, you CAN'T ACCEPT THE TRUTH. Humans WILL kill each other with WHATEVER means available, and the most convenient is a simple CAR!

    The occasional psychopath will kill another human, and a few of them get lucky and kill several. Giving everybody guns so that they can kill anybody who looks like a psychopath to them isn't a way of minimising the number killed - far from it.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12526679/Las-Vegas-hit-run-death-cyclist-Andreas-Probst.html

    The Daily Mail exists to give right-wing lunatic like you your daily fix of indignation. It doesn't have anything useful to say, and never did.

    WTF are you saying, Bozo, that this crime DIDN'T occur?

    The criminal act was real enough. but another poster has pointed out that it was joy-riding kids being less skilled drivers than they imagined, rather than intentionally mudereous.

    The appropriate response is to keep guns and cars out of the hands of dangerous psychopath - the US does have driving licenses but baulks at gun licenses.

    This crime shows that you DON'T need a gun to kill someone - a car or, better yet, a truck will do nicely. Knives are also useful for up close and personal murders.

    If you are pyschopathic enough to go in for that kind of behavior. Few people are. You do seem to be one of them, and may think that it is more common than better-inforned and saner people.

    Picking dangerous psychopaths isn't easy - you are probably an obvious example, but less stupid people can hide it better. Fantasies about using your concealed-carry gun to kill dangerous criminals are a bit of a give-away.

    LOL! I have held a top-secret security clearance; I seriously doubt that you have.

    You'd be wrong. I was cleared to "most secret" under the Australian system, which got me into US Army ECOM at Fort Monmouth in 1970

    Do you REALLY think they award those to psychopaths???

    The military is essentially psychopathic, a security clearance just means that they think you are one of their psychopaths. I was glad to get out of the environment. I was security vetted again a few years later when I went to work for EMI Central
    Research in the UK. That was on medical ultrasound, but the project had been spun off from a group that had developed a mortar locating radar for the UK army.

    You, OTOH, have advocated clear psychopathic tendencies, like NUKING and FIREBOMBING YOUR OWN COUNTRY!!!!!

    Except, of course that , that I haven't. That's your bizarre misrepresentation of what I was proposing. Only a psychopathic idiot like you could have misunderstood the two very different propositions quite so thoroughly.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to Flyguy on Wed Sep 20 09:09:45 2023
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:28:41 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:

    LOL! I have held a top-secret security clearance; I seriously doubt that you have. Do you REALLY think they award those to psychopaths???

    So did Teixeira, and several hundred thousand other marginal lunatics who shouldn't be trusted with a driver's license.

    And in the modern system, having a clearance means you were never caught committing serious crime. Period.


    --
    Bozo Bill Slowman, Sydney

    Bozo's Sewage Sweeper

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From a a@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Wed Sep 20 20:15:34 2023
    XPost: free.spam

    Off-topic troll...

    --
    Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

    X-Received: by 2002:ad4:59c8:0:b0:656:1d5f:f841 with SMTP id el8-20020ad459c8000000b006561d5ff841mr5585qvb.10.1695160041217;
    Tue, 19 Sep 2023 14:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1927:b0:3a8:4895:63e1 with SMTP id
    bf39-20020a056808192700b003a8489563e1mr344046oib.5.1695160040716; Tue, 19 Sep
    2023 14:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
    Path: not-for-mail
    Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
    Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 14:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
    In-Reply-To: <a8507fa4-8db7-428a-8dc9-87e7c215b1d8n@googlegroups.com> Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:5cc:4701:5250:4df:60b:8aff:b790;
    posting-account=iGtwSwoAAABNNwPORfvAs6OM4AR9GRHt
    NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:5cc:4701:5250:4df:60b:8aff:b790
    References: <d0b5d1dd-cf39-473e-830f-40454eeb8468n@googlegroups.com>
    <i69cgi1s903j6qrdoqo0lliqtq3m4f1n7p@4ax.com> <9a80755d-e412-41b6-be17-eb2cc5fbe5a9n@googlegroups.com>
    <f6a8e1bf-b4d2-4c8b-8121-205a97a9e2a2n@googlegroups.com> <ad9d961b-62ea-4478-8ff2-eabdb49a0972n@googlegroups.com>
    <9297c1a2-fbb5-4911-972f-2cc7dfed5746n@googlegroups.com> <2a941754-ff2d-4efa-9364-df503a2f0210n@googlegroups.com>
    <435ba469-4500-4a55-923f-6355ce20539cn@googlegroups.com> <975a89c9-aa68-4fb3-956b-160a2b408c6bn@googlegroups.com>
    <5f5144d6-d296-4f89-93db-b3904feb20dfn@googlegroups.com> <a8507fa4-8db7-428a-8dc9-87e7c215b1d8n@googlegroups.com>
    User-Agent: G2/1.0
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Message-ID: <bf83e8a7-32f7-4814-843f-ed069f1cd8dbn@googlegroups.com>
    Subject: Re: US gun violence kills 123 per day By BELINDA ROBINSON in New York
    | China Daily Global | Updated: 2023-09-15 08:06 Mark Braden (center), whose
    son Daniel was killed in the Sandy Hook school shooting, hugs another
    attendee during an event calling
    From: Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com>
    Injection-Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 21:47:21 +0000
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    X-Received-Bytes: 6533

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From a a@21:1/5 to Flyguy on Wed Sep 20 20:15:40 2023
    XPost: free.spam

    Off-topic troll...

    --
    Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote:

    X-Received: by 2002:ad4:55d0:0:b0:658:3b92:c4f2 with SMTP id bt16-20020ad455d0000000b006583b92c4f2mr10764qvb.11.1695176916593;
    Tue, 19 Sep 2023 19:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:2381:b0:3a7:3488:bc37 with SMTP id
    bp1-20020a056808238100b003a73488bc37mr581433oib.9.1695176916380; Tue, 19 Sep
    2023 19:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
    Path: not-for-mail
    Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
    Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 19:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
    In-Reply-To: <932bb971-0005-46fc-96cd-7ce901459d48n@googlegroups.com> Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:6c54:5300:6aee:153f:6a1b:ce17:733e;
    posting-account=igyo_woAAAAxdxQHjAB2cSS7_KQghTOv
    NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:6c54:5300:6aee:153f:6a1b:ce17:733e
    References: <d0b5d1dd-cf39-473e-830f-40454eeb8468n@googlegroups.com>
    <i69cgi1s903j6qrdoqo0lliqtq3m4f1n7p@4ax.com> <9a80755d-e412-41b6-be17-eb2cc5fbe5a9n@googlegroups.com>
    <f6a8e1bf-b4d2-4c8b-8121-205a97a9e2a2n@googlegroups.com> <eec51d5e-0ded-4fdc-b89d-060ebacae41dn@googlegroups.com>
    <f7c72d95-527c-4867-af4c-a99dd4a5a03dn@googlegroups.com> <5437a894-b3d3-4063-9494-e1f09b886a35n@googlegroups.com>
    <f79c8a27-a5d5-4736-8180-e89807c789f3n@googlegroups.com> <102ea71e-e9dc-46c1-8620-bad9bbd0038en@googlegroups.com>
    <932bb971-0005-46fc-96cd-7ce901459d48n@googlegroups.com>
    User-Agent: G2/1.0
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Message-ID: <22ac6e81-d555-416a-b2ac-c0ed8fe78a1en@googlegroups.com>
    Subject: Re: US gun violence kills 123 per day By BELINDA ROBINSON in New York
    | China Daily Global | Updated: 2023-09-15 08:06 Mark Braden (center), whose
    son Daniel was killed in the Sandy Hook school shooting, hugs another
    attendee during an event calling
    From: Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com>
    Injection-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 02:28:36 +0000
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    X-Received-Bytes: 6296

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From a a@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Wed Sep 20 20:15:52 2023
    XPost: free.spam

    Off-topic troll...

    --
    Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:409:b0:76d:c77f:cf0b with SMTP id 9-20020a05620a040900b0076dc77fcf0bmr34713qkp.9.1695220462321;
    Wed, 20 Sep 2023 07:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:1490:b0:3a9:db0f:39c9 with SMTP id
    e16-20020a056808149000b003a9db0f39c9mr1233359oiw.11.1695220461802; Wed, 20
    Sep 2023 07:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
    Path: not-for-mail
    Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
    Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 07:34:21 -0700 (PDT)
    In-Reply-To: <22ac6e81-d555-416a-b2ac-c0ed8fe78a1en@googlegroups.com> Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=59.102.83.245; posting-account=SJ46pgoAAABuUDuHc5uDiXN30ATE-zi-
    NNTP-Posting-Host: 59.102.83.245
    References: <d0b5d1dd-cf39-473e-830f-40454eeb8468n@googlegroups.com>
    <i69cgi1s903j6qrdoqo0lliqtq3m4f1n7p@4ax.com> <9a80755d-e412-41b6-be17-eb2cc5fbe5a9n@googlegroups.com>
    <f6a8e1bf-b4d2-4c8b-8121-205a97a9e2a2n@googlegroups.com> <eec51d5e-0ded-4fdc-b89d-060ebacae41dn@googlegroups.com>
    <f7c72d95-527c-4867-af4c-a99dd4a5a03dn@googlegroups.com> <5437a894-b3d3-4063-9494-e1f09b886a35n@googlegroups.com>
    <f79c8a27-a5d5-4736-8180-e89807c789f3n@googlegroups.com> <102ea71e-e9dc-46c1-8620-bad9bbd0038en@googlegroups.com>
    <932bb971-0005-46fc-96cd-7ce901459d48n@googlegroups.com> <22ac6e81-d555-416a-b2ac-c0ed8fe78a1en@googlegroups.com>
    User-Agent: G2/1.0
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Message-ID: <fb91cb07-a6a9-453e-889d-6bd54ce29dbcn@googlegroups.com>
    Subject: Re: US gun violence kills 123 per day By BELINDA ROBINSON in New York
    | China Daily Global | Updated: 2023-09-15 08:06 Mark Braden (center), whose
    son Daniel was killed in the Sandy Hook school shooting, hugs another
    attendee during an event calling
    From: Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
    Injection-Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 14:34:22 +0000
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    X-Received-Bytes: 7669

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Flyguy@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Wed Sep 20 21:25:23 2023
    On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 9:09:52 AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:28:41 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:

    LOL! I have held a top-secret security clearance; I seriously doubt that you have. Do you REALLY think they award those to psychopaths???
    So did Teixeira, and several hundred thousand other marginal lunatics who shouldn't be trusted with a driver's license.

    And in the modern system, having a clearance means you were never caught committing serious crime. Period.

    Translation: I've got NOTHING on you, so I will MAKE SHIT UP!


    --
    Bozo Bill Slowman, Sydney

    Bozo's Sewage Sweeper

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Flyguy@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Wed Sep 20 21:27:36 2023
    On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 7:34:27 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 12:28:41 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 12:34:19 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 3:07:31 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 10:11:21 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 2:34:14 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:35:46 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 1:11:40 AM UTC+10, Michael Terrell wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:47:28 AM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:33:45 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:00:11 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:

    <snip>
    I get irritated when people falsely claim I've made a mistake. I'm much less worried when somebody picks me up on a real mistake, but it doesn't happen often. Mike Terrell can't tell the difference.

    It happens all the time - I only point out a few of them, like thinking that NUKING and FIREBOMBING your OWN COUNTRY is a good idea.

    I don't. The mistake that let you think I do - or that you can get away with making that fatuous claim - is all yours.

    Yes, you FUCKING DO! You have recently reaffirmed you ABSURD backing of this ABSURD IDEA. Do I have to POST your OWN WORDS, you fucking IDIOT???

    You really should. The difference between using nuclear explosives - Project Plowshare style - to make a mine inaccessible to an invader, and "nuking your won country" is pretty dramatic.

    The US set of some 35 nuclear explosions in it's own country while exploring the idea, and nobody has been prolsecuted for nuking your own country.\

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Plowshare

    <snip>
    Defensive gun use (DGU) in the US occurs between 150 and 6500 times PER DAY, with the most likely number around 800.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_gun_use

    The main thrust of that report is that your numbers are implausible fantasies, concocted to keep the NRA happy. You capacity for misunderstanding evidence blinds you to this.

    This is what you anti-gun fanatics want to think, but, as usual, you CAN'T ACCEPT THE TRUTH. Humans WILL kill each other with WHATEVER means available, and the most convenient is a simple CAR!

    The occasional psychopath will kill another human, and a few of them get lucky and kill several. Giving everybody guns so that they can kill anybody who looks like a psychopath to them isn't a way of minimising the number killed - far from it.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12526679/Las-Vegas-hit-run-death-cyclist-Andreas-Probst.html

    The Daily Mail exists to give right-wing lunatic like you your daily fix of indignation. It doesn't have anything useful to say, and never did.

    WTF are you saying, Bozo, that this crime DIDN'T occur?
    The criminal act was real enough. but another poster has pointed out that it was joy-riding kids being less skilled drivers than they imagined, rather than intentionally mudereous.

    The appropriate response is to keep guns and cars out of the hands of dangerous psychopath - the US does have driving licenses but baulks at gun licenses.

    This crime shows that you DON'T need a gun to kill someone - a car or, better yet, a truck will do nicely. Knives are also useful for up close and personal murders.
    If you are pyschopathic enough to go in for that kind of behavior. Few people are. You do seem to be one of them, and may think that it is more common than better-inforned and saner people.

    Picking dangerous psychopaths isn't easy - you are probably an obvious example, but less stupid people can hide it better. Fantasies about using your concealed-carry gun to kill dangerous criminals are a bit of a give-away.
    LOL! I have held a top-secret security clearance; I seriously doubt that you have.
    You'd be wrong. I was cleared to "most secret" under the Australian system, which got me into US Army ECOM at Fort Monmouth in 1970
    Do you REALLY think they award those to psychopaths???
    The military is essentially psychopathic, a security clearance just means that they think you are one of their psychopaths. I was glad to get out of the environment. I was security vetted again a few years later when I went to work for EMI Central
    Research in the UK. That was on medical ultrasound, but the project had been spun off from a group that had developed a mortar locating radar for the UK army.
    You, OTOH, have advocated clear psychopathic tendencies, like NUKING and FIREBOMBING YOUR OWN COUNTRY!!!!!
    Except, of course that , that I haven't. That's your bizarre misrepresentation of what I was proposing. Only a psychopathic idiot like you could have misunderstood the two very different propositions quite so thoroughly.

    Which PROVES that YOU are the psychopath, denying what you have WRITTEN here on SED, some very recently, Bozo.


    --
    Bozo Bill Slowman, Sydney

    Bozo's Sewage Sweeper

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Flyguy on Wed Sep 20 23:40:02 2023
    On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 2:27:42 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 7:34:27 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 12:28:41 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 12:34:19 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 3:07:31 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 10:11:21 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 2:34:14 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:35:46 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Monday, September 18, 2023 at 1:11:40 AM UTC+10, Michael Terrell wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:47:28 AM UTC-4, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 11:33:45 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Sunday, September 17, 2023 at 8:00:11 AM UTC+10, John Larkin wrote:
    On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 11:56:33 -0700 (PDT), a a <mant...@gmail.com> wrote:

    <snip>
    I get irritated when people falsely claim I've made a mistake. I'm much less worried when somebody picks me up on a real mistake, but it doesn't happen often. Mike Terrell can't tell the difference.

    It happens all the time - I only point out a few of them, like thinking that NUKING and FIREBOMBING your OWN COUNTRY is a good idea.

    I don't. The mistake that let you think I do - or that you can get away with making that fatuous claim - is all yours.

    Yes, you FUCKING DO! You have recently reaffirmed you ABSURD backing of this ABSURD IDEA. Do I have to POST your OWN WORDS, you fucking IDIOT???

    You really should. The difference between using nuclear explosives - Project Plowshare style - to make a mine inaccessible to an invader, and "nuking your won country" is pretty dramatic.

    The US set of some 35 nuclear explosions in it's own country while exploring the idea, and nobody has been prolsecuted for nuking your own country.\

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Plowshare

    <snip>
    Defensive gun use (DGU) in the US occurs between 150 and 6500 times PER DAY, with the most likely number around 800.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_gun_use

    The main thrust of that report is that your numbers are implausible fantasies, concocted to keep the NRA happy. You capacity for misunderstanding evidence blinds you to this.

    This is what you anti-gun fanatics want to think, but, as usual, you CAN'T ACCEPT THE TRUTH. Humans WILL kill each other with WHATEVER means available, and the most convenient is a simple CAR!

    The occasional psychopath will kill another human, and a few of them get lucky and kill several. Giving everybody guns so that they can kill anybody who looks like a psychopath to them isn't a way of minimising the number killed - far from it.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12526679/Las-Vegas-hit-run-death-cyclist-Andreas-Probst.html

    The Daily Mail exists to give right-wing lunatic like you your daily fix of indignation. It doesn't have anything useful to say, and never did.

    WTF are you saying, Bozo, that this crime DIDN'T occur?
    The criminal act was real enough. but another poster has pointed out that it was joy-riding kids being less skilled drivers than they imagined, rather than intentionally mudereous.

    The appropriate response is to keep guns and cars out of the hands of dangerous psychopath - the US does have driving licenses but baulks at gun licenses.

    This crime shows that you DON'T need a gun to kill someone - a car or, better yet, a truck will do nicely. Knives are also useful for up close and personal murders.
    If you are pyschopathic enough to go in for that kind of behavior. Few people are. You do seem to be one of them, and may think that it is more common than better-inforned and saner people.

    Picking dangerous psychopaths isn't easy - you are probably an obvious example, but less stupid people can hide it better. Fantasies about using your concealed-carry gun to kill dangerous criminals are a bit of a give-away.

    LOL! I have held a top-secret security clearance; I seriously doubt that you have.

    You'd be wrong. I was cleared to "most secret" under the Australian system, which got me into US Army ECOM at Fort Monmouth in 1970.

    Do you REALLY think they award those to psychopaths???

    The military is essentially psychopathic, a security clearance just means that they think you are one of their psychopaths. I was glad to get out of the environment. I was security vetted again a few years later when I went to work for EMI Central
    Research in the UK. That was on medical ultrasound, but the project had been spun off from a group that had developed a mortar locating radar for the UK army.

    You, OTOH, have advocated clear psychopathic tendencies, like NUKING and FIREBOMBING YOUR OWN COUNTRY!!!!!

    Except, of course that , that I haven't. That's your bizarre misrepresentation of what I was proposing. Only a psychopathic idiot like you could have misunderstood the two very different propositions quite so thoroughly.

    Which PROVES that YOU are the psychopath, denying what you have WRITTEN here on SED, some very recently, Bozo.

    Sewage Sweeper misuses the word "proof" in the same way he misuses the word "translation". If his demented brain can misinterpret a text string to mean something he likes, he imagines that everybody else can and will make the same mistake. If he wasn't
    in late stage senile dementia he'd be able to realise that he was wrong from the responses he gets, but he just writes it off as a meaningless hostile reaction.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From a a@21:1/5 to Flyguy on Thu Sep 21 14:13:05 2023
    XPost: free.spam

    Off-topic troll...

    --
    Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote:

    X-Received: by 2002:ad4:4f28:0:b0:63c:fa98:69e8 with SMTP id fc8-20020ad44f28000000b0063cfa9869e8mr48061qvb.8.1695270457368;
    Wed, 20 Sep 2023 21:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:ed5:b0:6ba:3da9:bf53 with SMTP id
    dq21-20020a0568300ed500b006ba3da9bf53mr1482774otb.3.1695270457002; Wed, 20
    Sep 2023 21:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
    Path: not-for-mail
    Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
    Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 21:27:36 -0700 (PDT)
    In-Reply-To: <fb91cb07-a6a9-453e-889d-6bd54ce29dbcn@googlegroups.com> Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:6c54:5300:6aee:153f:6a1b:ce17:733e;
    posting-account=igyo_woAAAAxdxQHjAB2cSS7_KQghTOv
    NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:6c54:5300:6aee:153f:6a1b:ce17:733e
    References: <d0b5d1dd-cf39-473e-830f-40454eeb8468n@googlegroups.com>
    <i69cgi1s903j6qrdoqo0lliqtq3m4f1n7p@4ax.com> <9a80755d-e412-41b6-be17-eb2cc5fbe5a9n@googlegroups.com>
    <f6a8e1bf-b4d2-4c8b-8121-205a97a9e2a2n@googlegroups.com> <eec51d5e-0ded-4fdc-b89d-060ebacae41dn@googlegroups.com>
    <f7c72d95-527c-4867-af4c-a99dd4a5a03dn@googlegroups.com> <5437a894-b3d3-4063-9494-e1f09b886a35n@googlegroups.com>
    <f79c8a27-a5d5-4736-8180-e89807c789f3n@googlegroups.com> <102ea71e-e9dc-46c1-8620-bad9bbd0038en@googlegroups.com>
    <932bb971-0005-46fc-96cd-7ce901459d48n@googlegroups.com> <22ac6e81-d555-416a-b2ac-c0ed8fe78a1en@googlegroups.com>
    <fb91cb07-a6a9-453e-889d-6bd54ce29dbcn@googlegroups.com>
    User-Agent: G2/1.0
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Message-ID: <33dd4eff-b51a-45ae-82af-adf92e57a289n@googlegroups.com>
    Subject: Re: US gun violence kills 123 per day By BELINDA ROBINSON in New York
    | China Daily Global | Updated: 2023-09-15 08:06 Mark Braden (center), whose
    son Daniel was killed in the Sandy Hook school shooting, hugs another
    attendee during an event calling
    From: Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com>
    Injection-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 04:27:37 +0000
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    X-Received-Bytes: 8137

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Flyguy on Thu Sep 21 08:56:19 2023
    On Thursday, September 21, 2023 at 2:25:28 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 9:09:52 AM UTC-7, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 19, 2023 at 10:28:41 PM UTC-4, Flyguy wrote:

    LOL! I have held a top-secret security clearance; I seriously doubt that you have. Do you REALLY think they award those to psychopaths???

    So did Teixeira, and several hundred thousand other marginal lunatics who shouldn't be trusted with a driver's license.

    And in the modern system, having a clearance means you were never caught committing serious crime. Period.

    Translation: I've got NOTHING on you, so I will MAKE SHIT UP!

    Sewage Sweeper can't construct coherent arguments so he pretends to paraphrase what is being said to him as it meant what he would have liked it to mean.

    He seems to think it worth claiming - as an anonymous troll - that he once held a security clearance, back before he'd succumbed to senile dementia.

    He probably thinks that the key card that let him top-up his toilet-cleaning fluids was some kind of security clearance.

    --
    Bil Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)