• =?UTF-8?Q?US_sets_record_for_billion=2Ddollar_weather_disasters_?= =?UT

    From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 11 16:00:53 2023
    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.

    https://apnews.com/article/weather-disasters-climate-change-fire-hurricane-2bcb9fff659d12338cc8f7eb7f82c2a1

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com on Tue Sep 12 09:12:10 2023
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.

    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate
    figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential
    elections.
    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate
    catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of
    'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault'
    and these 'poor, displaced people' have no other option, have they?
    Camp of the Saints, anyone?



    https://apnews.com/article/weather-disasters-climate-change-fire-hurricane-2bcb9fff659d12338cc8f7eb7f82c2a1

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?w5bDtiBUaWli?=@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Tue Sep 12 01:51:20 2023
    On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 11:12:20 UTC+3, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.
    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate
    figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential
    elections.
    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of
    'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault'
    and these 'poor, displaced people' have no other option, have they?
    Camp of the Saints, anyone?

    You mix together your denial of climate change and your xenophobia.
    These properties are totally unrelated from each other.
    All four extremes of combination are conceivable and valid political
    positions:
    1) the climate is doing great and we must help the poor people escaping
    from their evil countries as lot we can.
    2) the climate is doing great but we must kill the evil criminal foreigners coming here to improve our life even more.
    3) there is climate catastrophe starting that is partially caused by us and
    we must help the poor people escaping from their countries as lot we can.
    4) there is climate catastrophe starting that is partially caused by us
    and we must kill the foreigners coming here on first sight for to survive.



    https://apnews.com/article/weather-disasters-climate-change-fire-hurricane-2bcb9fff659d12338cc8f7eb7f82c2a1

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Tue Sep 12 03:23:46 2023
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 6:12:20 PM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.

    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up with the climate figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential elections.

    Ask anybody silly enough to believe what he reads in the Daily Mail.

    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of 'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault' and these 'poor, displaced people' have no other
    option, have they?

    They do, but emigrating to a richer country is a more attractive option. The fact that the country got rich by setting the climate catastrophe in train does come into it.

    Camp of the Saints, anyone?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Camp_of_the_Saints

    We don't share your taste for implausible nonsense, even if the book does seem to have developed a following amongst far-right half-wits.
    I wouldn't have placed you higher than quarter-wit, but maybe you have aspirations.

    https://apnews.com/article/weather-disasters-climate-change-fire-hurricane-2bcb9fff659d12338cc8f7eb7f82c2a1

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Tue Sep 12 04:40:09 2023
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20 AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.
    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate
    figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential elections.
    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of
    'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault'
    and these 'poor, displaced people' have no other option, have they?
    Camp of the Saints, anyone?

    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind storms, and
    torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all. They're
    now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe catastrophic
    weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.




    https://apnews.com/article/weather-disasters-climate-change-fire-hurricane-2bcb9fff659d12338cc8f7eb7f82c2a1

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com on Tue Sep 12 13:58:04 2023
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.
    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate
    figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential
    elections.
    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate
    catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of
    'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault'
    and these 'poor, displaced people' have no other option, have they?
    Camp of the Saints, anyone?

    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind storms, and
    torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all. They're
    now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe catastrophic
    weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.

    Let's just assume all the above nonsense is true for a moment. What
    phenomenon do you attribute this 'climate catastrophe' to ultimately,
    pray tell?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?w5bDtiBUaWli?=@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Tue Sep 12 09:53:25 2023
    On Tuesday, 12 September 2023 at 15:58:13 UTC+3, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.
    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate
    figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential
    elections.
    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate
    catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of
    'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault'
    and these 'poor, displaced people' have no other option, have they?
    Camp of the Saints, anyone?

    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind storms, and
    torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all. They're
    now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe catastrophic
    weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.

    Let's just assume all the above nonsense is true for a moment. What phenomenon do you attribute this 'climate catastrophe' to ultimately,
    pray tell?

    Why don't you read what US government agencies report and
    illustrate with pie charts? Taxpayers pay for that. <https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases>
    Similar measurements are done about whole world.

    All scientists warnings were ignored. Svante Arrhenius did show already
    1896 that CO2 is greenhouse gas. Charles David Keeling demonstrated
    in sixties that the quantity of human-caused carbon dioxide emissions
    into the air is enough to cause global warming. Who argues with it?
    Only fossil burning industry propaganda.

    It likely won't be outright climate catastrophe that sea starts to boil.
    But it will be rather inconvenient for already current and next generations
    for sure. Problems, deaths ... <https://edition.cnn.com/2023/07/10/world/deadly-europe-heatwave-2022-climate/index.html>
    ... will get worse. And the climate refugees you probably already observe.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Tue Sep 12 09:54:53 2023
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:58:13 AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.
    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate
    figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential
    elections.
    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate
    catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of
    'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault'
    and these 'poor, displaced people' have no other option, have they?
    Camp of the Saints, anyone?

    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind storms, and
    torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all. They're
    now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe catastrophic
    weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.
    Let's just assume all the above nonsense is true for a moment. What phenomenon do you attribute this 'climate catastrophe' to ultimately,
    pray tell?

    Fundamentally it is due to this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_energy_budget

    Regardless of the debate about exactly what's causing this, the imbalance is in fact there and measured with great precision by multiple satellite constellations.

    As long as the incoming energy exceeds the outgoing, Earth will continue to get warmer. And there's stuff happening on Earth, like methane release due to tundra melt, that accelerates the warming.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com on Tue Sep 12 14:35:07 2023
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.

    https://apnews.com/article/weather-disasters-climate-change-fire-hurricane-2bcb9fff659d12338cc8f7eb7f82c2a1

    Sure, inflation makes things more expensive.

    The worst hurricane in US history was the great Galveston storm of
    1900. Houses and lives were cheap back then.

    People shouldn't build flimsy, flammible houses in harm's way.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com on Tue Sep 12 22:18:14 2023
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.
    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate
    figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential
    elections.
    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate
    catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of
    'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault'
    and these 'poor, displaced people' have no other option, have they?
    Camp of the Saints, anyone?

    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind storms, and
    torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all. They're
    now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe catastrophic
    weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.
    Let's just assume all the above nonsense is true for a moment. What
    phenomenon do you attribute this 'climate catastrophe' to ultimately,
    pray tell?

    Fundamentally it is due to this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_energy_budget

    Regardless of the debate about exactly what's causing this, the imbalance is in fact there and measured with great precision by multiple satellite constellations.

    As long as the incoming energy exceeds the outgoing, Earth will continue to get warmer. And there's stuff happening on Earth, like methane release due to tundra melt, that accelerates the warming.

    I don't buy it. My own lengthy and extensive investigations show that
    whilst I can't rule out some amount of warming, I *can* rule out CO2
    and methane levels as a culprit. Electron warming of the ionosphere
    due to the massive increase in broadcast emissions since about 1920
    far better fits the data.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Tue Sep 12 18:29:12 2023
    On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 7:18:22 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote: >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.

    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential elections.

    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of 'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault' and these 'poor, displaced people' have no
    other option, have they?

    Of course they do.

    <snipped reference to twaddle>

    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind storms, and
    torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all. They're
    now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe catastrophic
    weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.

    Let's just assume all the above nonsense is true for a moment. What phenomenon do you attribute this 'climate catastrophe' to ultimately, pray tell?

    Fundamentally it is due to this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_energy_budget

    Regardless of the debate about exactly what's causing this, the imbalance is in fact there and measured with great precision by multiple satellite constellations.

    As long as the incoming energy exceeds the outgoing, Earth will continue to get warmer. And there's stuff happening on Earth, like methane release due to tundra melt, that accelerates the warming.

    I don't buy it. My own lengthy and extensive investigations show that whilst I can't rule out some amount of warming, I *can* rule out CO2 and methane levels as a culprit. Electron warming of the ionosphere due to the massive increase in broadcast
    emissions since about 1920 far better fits the data.

    Largely because Cursitor Doom's lengthy, extensive and totally incompetent investigations ignore modern data - he likes to claim that it all faked - that show he is talking utter bollocks.

    Fred Bloggs enthusiasm for energy imbalance is equally daft. The core of the earth can store a huge amount of heat without getting significant warmer, while we live on the thin skin on the surface which has a rather shorter thermal time constant.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydhey

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From whit3rd@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Tue Sep 12 21:31:10 2023
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 2:18:22 PM UTC-7, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    As long as the incoming energy exceeds the outgoing, Earth will continue to get warmer. And there's stuff happening on Earth, like methane release due to tundra melt, that accelerates the warming.

    OK, that's pretty standard thermodynamics.

    I don't buy it. My own lengthy and extensive investigations show that
    whilst I can't rule out some amount of warming, I *can* rule out CO2
    and methane levels as a culprit. Electron warming of the ionosphere
    due to the massive increase in broadcast emissions since about 1920
    far better fits the data.

    There's a LOT of data on thermodynamics that shows us a mechanism, and
    your 'lengthy' investigations don't include that centuries-old bit of science. That 'fits the data' comment means you're a chartist, trying to infer trends and
    extrapolate a black box. Chartists lose money on the stock market, and haven't
    got the credibility of a good scientific theory. Cursitor Doom hasn't lost money here, but his credibility is negligible.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Wed Sep 13 11:22:15 2023
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 9:29:17 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 7:18:22 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.

    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential elections.

    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of 'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault' and these 'poor, displaced people' have no
    other option, have they?
    Of course they do.

    <snipped reference to twaddle>
    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind storms,
    and torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all. They'
    re now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe
    catastrophic weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.

    Let's just assume all the above nonsense is true for a moment. What phenomenon do you attribute this 'climate catastrophe' to ultimately, pray tell?

    Fundamentally it is due to this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_energy_budget

    Regardless of the debate about exactly what's causing this, the imbalance is in fact there and measured with great precision by multiple satellite constellations.

    As long as the incoming energy exceeds the outgoing, Earth will continue to get warmer. And there's stuff happening on Earth, like methane release due to tundra melt, that accelerates the warming.

    I don't buy it. My own lengthy and extensive investigations show that whilst I can't rule out some amount of warming, I *can* rule out CO2 and methane levels as a culprit. Electron warming of the ionosphere due to the massive increase in broadcast
    emissions since about 1920 far better fits the data.
    Largely because Cursitor Doom's lengthy, extensive and totally incompetent investigations ignore modern data - he likes to claim that it all faked - that show he is talking utter bollocks.

    Fred Bloggs enthusiasm for energy imbalance is equally daft. The core of the earth can store a huge amount of heat without getting significant warmer, while we live on the thin skin on the surface which has a rather shorter thermal time constant.

    Sloman is analytically impaired, he can't come up with the first arithmetic estimate of his insane claims. And his claims run contrary to the best estimates of people like James Hansen.

    Sloman may be overlooking the fact the Earth's core has a 100,000 year absorption time constant. This aside from the fact of heat energy flowing from warmer to cooler temperatures making just the thinnest shell of the planet, 200E6 sq mi surface,
    available for heat exchange, which goes both ways...

    Energy balance is everything, and the people who have been working on it have dead certain rate of warming corelating very strongly with it.


    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydhey

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to John Larkin on Wed Sep 13 11:34:21 2023
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 5:35:25 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.

    https://apnews.com/article/weather-disasters-climate-change-fire-hurricane-2bcb9fff659d12338cc8f7eb7f82c2a1
    Sure, inflation makes things more expensive.

    The worst hurricane in US history was the great Galveston storm of
    1900. Houses and lives were cheap back then.

    People shouldn't build flimsy, flammible houses in harm's way.

    Worst stuff has happened. There is strong evidence of some huge sandstorm blowing off the Sahara that killed everyone on NA east coast by suffocation some 10-50 thousand years ago . Evidence is in the form of uncovered sand deposits and abrupt
    disappearance of remains of human activity.

    Be thankful those mega-bear things that stood 15 ft at the shoulder and could run 45 MPH are no longer roaming around.

    Everyone is going to have to live in concrete berm houses/ buildings...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Wed Sep 13 11:26:05 2023
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 5:18:22 PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote: >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.
    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate
    figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential
    elections.
    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate
    catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of
    'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault' >> >> and these 'poor, displaced people' have no other option, have they?
    Camp of the Saints, anyone?

    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind storms, and
    torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all. They're
    now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe catastrophic
    weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.
    Let's just assume all the above nonsense is true for a moment. What
    phenomenon do you attribute this 'climate catastrophe' to ultimately,
    pray tell?

    Fundamentally it is due to this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_energy_budget

    Regardless of the debate about exactly what's causing this, the imbalance is in fact there and measured with great precision by multiple satellite constellations.

    As long as the incoming energy exceeds the outgoing, Earth will continue to get warmer. And there's stuff happening on Earth, like methane release due to tundra melt, that accelerates the warming.
    I don't buy it. My own lengthy and extensive investigations show that
    whilst I can't rule out some amount of warming, I *can* rule out CO2
    and methane levels as a culprit. Electron warming of the ionosphere
    due to the massive increase in broadcast emissions since about 1920
    far better fits the data.

    You do understand the science has uncovered atmospheric fossils in the form of air bubbles trapped in 100 million year old ice? Methane and CO2 play a very strong role in warming as well as cooling. You don't have to go back nearly as far in time to find
    a complete absence of broadcast emissions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Wed Sep 13 11:48:58 2023
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 9:29:17 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 7:18:22 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.

    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential elections.

    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of 'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault' and these 'poor, displaced people' have no
    other option, have they?
    Of course they do.

    <snipped reference to twaddle>
    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind storms,
    and torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all. They'
    re now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe
    catastrophic weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.

    Let's just assume all the above nonsense is true for a moment. What phenomenon do you attribute this 'climate catastrophe' to ultimately, pray tell?

    Fundamentally it is due to this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_energy_budget

    Regardless of the debate about exactly what's causing this, the imbalance is in fact there and measured with great precision by multiple satellite constellations.

    As long as the incoming energy exceeds the outgoing, Earth will continue to get warmer. And there's stuff happening on Earth, like methane release due to tundra melt, that accelerates the warming.

    I don't buy it. My own lengthy and extensive investigations show that whilst I can't rule out some amount of warming, I *can* rule out CO2 and methane levels as a culprit. Electron warming of the ionosphere due to the massive increase in broadcast
    emissions since about 1920 far better fits the data.
    Largely because Cursitor Doom's lengthy, extensive and totally incompetent investigations ignore modern data - he likes to claim that it all faked - that show he is talking utter bollocks.

    Fred Bloggs enthusiasm for energy imbalance is equally daft. The core of the earth can store a huge amount of heat without getting significant warmer, while we live on the thin skin on the surface which has a rather shorter thermal time constant.

    The only way global warming can heat the core is by reducing the temperature gradient to the surface, and y a very minuscule amount. So the internally generated thermal energy stabilizes at an immeasurably higher temperature. Since geothermal energy
    contributes 100ths of a percent of total global energy input, your idea is totally wackadoodle.


    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydhey

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Larkin@21:1/5 to bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com on Wed Sep 13 12:24:37 2023
    On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:34:21 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 5:35:25?PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.

    https://apnews.com/article/weather-disasters-climate-change-fire-hurricane-2bcb9fff659d12338cc8f7eb7f82c2a1
    Sure, inflation makes things more expensive.

    The worst hurricane in US history was the great Galveston storm of
    1900. Houses and lives were cheap back then.

    People shouldn't build flimsy, flammible houses in harm's way.

    Worst stuff has happened. There is strong evidence of some huge sandstorm blowing off the Sahara that killed everyone on NA east coast by suffocation some 10-50 thousand years ago . Evidence is in the form of uncovered sand deposits and abrupt
    disappearance of remains of human activity.

    Be thankful those mega-bear things that stood 15 ft at the shoulder and could run 45 MPH are no longer roaming around.

    Everyone is going to have to live in concrete berm houses/ buildings...

    People insist on building big ranch-style houses on beaches and in
    flood plains. In Louisiana, some people had the sense to use stilt
    pilings for the garage level.

    Building in or near forests is scenic too.

    Lahaina and Paradise were firetraps.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to John Larkin on Wed Sep 13 12:32:40 2023
    On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 3:24:56 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
    On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:34:21 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 5:35:25?PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.

    https://apnews.com/article/weather-disasters-climate-change-fire-hurricane-2bcb9fff659d12338cc8f7eb7f82c2a1
    Sure, inflation makes things more expensive.

    The worst hurricane in US history was the great Galveston storm of
    1900. Houses and lives were cheap back then.

    People shouldn't build flimsy, flammible houses in harm's way.

    Worst stuff has happened. There is strong evidence of some huge sandstorm blowing off the Sahara that killed everyone on NA east coast by suffocation some 10-50 thousand years ago . Evidence is in the form of uncovered sand deposits and abrupt
    disappearance of remains of human activity.

    Be thankful those mega-bear things that stood 15 ft at the shoulder and could run 45 MPH are no longer roaming around.

    Everyone is going to have to live in concrete berm houses/ buildings... People insist on building big ranch-style houses on beaches and in
    flood plains. In Louisiana, some people had the sense to use stilt
    pilings for the garage level.

    Building in or near forests is scenic too.

    Lahaina and Paradise were firetraps.

    Risk results for vulnerability and exposure. Flimsy building (vulnerability) in the dumbest places (exposure) is just plain high risk. The market is correcting for this and should greatly dampen the new construction. People stuck in the legacy stuff are
    just that, stuck.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com on Wed Sep 13 23:46:48 2023
    On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:26:05 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 5:18:22?PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.
    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate
    figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential
    elections.
    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate
    catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of
    'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault' >> >> >> and these 'poor, displaced people' have no other option, have they?
    Camp of the Saints, anyone?

    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind storms, and
    torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all. They're
    now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe catastrophic
    weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.
    Let's just assume all the above nonsense is true for a moment. What
    phenomenon do you attribute this 'climate catastrophe' to ultimately,
    pray tell?

    Fundamentally it is due to this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_energy_budget

    Regardless of the debate about exactly what's causing this, the imbalance is in fact there and measured with great precision by multiple satellite constellations.

    As long as the incoming energy exceeds the outgoing, Earth will continue to get warmer. And there's stuff happening on Earth, like methane release due to tundra melt, that accelerates the warming.
    I don't buy it. My own lengthy and extensive investigations show that
    whilst I can't rule out some amount of warming, I *can* rule out CO2
    and methane levels as a culprit. Electron warming of the ionosphere
    due to the massive increase in broadcast emissions since about 1920
    far better fits the data.

    You do understand the science has uncovered atmospheric fossils in the form of air bubbles trapped in 100 million year old ice? Methane and CO2 play a very strong role in warming as well as cooling. You don't have to go back nearly as far in time to
    find a complete absence of broadcast emissions.

    Sorry, Fred, but the "greenhouse gas" theory of warming is total
    garbage and there is *zero* correlation between CO2 levels and
    temperature. For the avoidance of doubt, let me repeat that once more:
    *ZERO* correlation. *If* warming is happening, you need to identify a
    different culprit for the phenomenon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cursitor Doom@21:1/5 to bill.sloman@ieee.org on Wed Sep 13 23:40:48 2023
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 18:29:12 -0700 (PDT), Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 7:18:22?AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.

    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential elections.

    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of 'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault' and these 'poor, displaced people' have no
    other option, have they?

    Of course they do.

    <snipped reference to twaddle>

    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind storms, and
    torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all. They're
    now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe catastrophic
    weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.

    Let's just assume all the above nonsense is true for a moment. What phenomenon do you attribute this 'climate catastrophe' to ultimately, pray tell?

    Fundamentally it is due to this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_energy_budget

    Regardless of the debate about exactly what's causing this, the imbalance is in fact there and measured with great precision by multiple satellite constellations.

    As long as the incoming energy exceeds the outgoing, Earth will continue to get warmer. And there's stuff happening on Earth, like methane release due to tundra melt, that accelerates the warming.

    I don't buy it. My own lengthy and extensive investigations show that whilst I can't rule out some amount of warming, I *can* rule out CO2 and methane levels as a culprit. Electron warming of the ionosphere due to the massive increase in broadcast
    emissions since about 1920 far better fits the data.

    Largely because Cursitor Doom's lengthy, extensive and totally incompetent investigations ignore modern data - he likes to claim that it all faked - that show he is talking utter bollocks.

    Bill, you're just trolling again as always and you don't do much else
    these days, either. Sorry, but I'm not biting today; better luck next
    time.


    Fred Bloggs enthusiasm for energy imbalance is equally daft. The core of the earth can store a huge amount of heat without getting significant warmer, while we live on the thin skin on the surface which has a rather shorter thermal time constant.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Wed Sep 13 18:23:29 2023
    On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 6:46:58 PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:26:05 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 5:18:22?PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote: >> >> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.
    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate >> >> >> figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential >> >> >> elections.
    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate >> >> >> catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of
    'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault'
    and these 'poor, displaced people' have no other option, have they? >> >> >> Camp of the Saints, anyone?

    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind storms,
    and torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all. They'
    re now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe
    catastrophic weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.
    Let's just assume all the above nonsense is true for a moment. What
    phenomenon do you attribute this 'climate catastrophe' to ultimately, >> >> pray tell?

    Fundamentally it is due to this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_energy_budget

    Regardless of the debate about exactly what's causing this, the imbalance is in fact there and measured with great precision by multiple satellite constellations.

    As long as the incoming energy exceeds the outgoing, Earth will continue to get warmer. And there's stuff happening on Earth, like methane release due to tundra melt, that accelerates the warming.
    I don't buy it. My own lengthy and extensive investigations show that
    whilst I can't rule out some amount of warming, I *can* rule out CO2
    and methane levels as a culprit. Electron warming of the ionosphere
    due to the massive increase in broadcast emissions since about 1920
    far better fits the data.

    You do understand the science has uncovered atmospheric fossils in the form of air bubbles trapped in 100 million year old ice? Methane and CO2 play a very strong role in warming as well as cooling. You don't have to go back nearly as far in time to
    find a complete absence of broadcast emissions.
    Sorry, Fred, but the "greenhouse gas" theory of warming is total
    garbage and there is *zero* correlation between CO2 levels and
    temperature. For the avoidance of doubt, let me repeat that once more: *ZERO* correlation. *If* warming is happening, you need to identify a different culprit for the phenomenon.

    Correlation is a statistical technique to make a determination of dependence between two random variables. CO2 concentration is not a random variable, it is a deterministic variable. The big problem there is the very large number of other deterministic
    variables corrupting hypothetical regression testing of CO2. But why bother really, there is such a thing called physics. The 'blanketing' effect of CO2 has been well known and established for over 150 years. And thank goodness for it, Earth would a
    frozen mess without it.

    Read the link below, especially Fig. 1. Spectrum of the greenhouse radiation measured at the surface. Let us know the problems you see with it Energy im-balance is a net gain of heat and steadily increasing, and that's a measurement, not sampling
    inference. It's bad enough as it is, but the idea of allowing the rate of gain to increase is suicide:

    https://skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-global-warming.htm

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Wed Sep 13 23:49:19 2023
    On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 4:22:22 AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 9:29:17 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 7:18:22 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.

    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential elections.

    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of 'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault' and these 'poor, displaced people' have no
    other option, have they?
    Of course they do.

    <snipped reference to twaddle>
    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind storms,
    and torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all. They'
    re now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe
    catastrophic weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.

    Let's just assume all the above nonsense is true for a moment. What phenomenon do you attribute this 'climate catastrophe' to ultimately, pray tell?

    Fundamentally it is due to this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_energy_budget

    Regardless of the debate about exactly what's causing this, the imbalance is in fact there and measured with great precision by multiple satellite constellations.

    As long as the incoming energy exceeds the outgoing, Earth will continue to get warmer. And there's stuff happening on Earth, like methane release due to tundra melt, that accelerates the warming.

    I don't buy it. My own lengthy and extensive investigations show that whilst I can't rule out some amount of warming, I *can* rule out CO2 and methane levels as a culprit. Electron warming of the ionosphere due to the massive increase in broadcast
    emissions since about 1920 far better fits the data.

    Largely because Cursitor Doom's lengthy, extensive and totally incompetent investigations ignore modern data - he likes to claim that it all faked - that show he is talking utter bollocks.

    Fred Bloggs enthusiasm for energy imbalance is equally daft. The core of the earth can store a huge amount of heat without getting significant warmer, while we live on the thin skin on the surface which has a rather shorter thermal time constant.

    Sloman is analytically impaired, he can't come up with the first arithmetic estimate of his insane claims. And his claims run contrary to the best estimates of people like James Hansen.

    The insanity is all Fred Bloggs', and if he thinks that James Hansen talks about "energy imbalance" he'd better post a link to the relevant text.

    Sloman may be overlooking the fact the Earth's core has a 100,000 year absorption time constant. This aside from the fact of heat energy flowing from warmer to cooler temperatures making just the thinnest shell of the planet, 200E6 sq mi surface,
    available for heat exchange, which goes both ways...

    I have no idea of the thermal tine constant of the earth as a whole - 100,000 years sounds vaguely plausible, but there's absolute no point in working out an exact value. The point that we live on the surface of the planet, which has less thermal
    inertia, is one that I'd just posted.

    Energy balance is everything, and the people who have been working on it have dead certain rate of warming correlating very strongly with it.

    Energy balance makes for a superficially analytical presentation, until they ignore the heat flowing down into the core of the planet.
    It's not actually a useful way to think about the issue, but since Fred is just constructing superficially impressive rhetoric he doesn't know about that.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Thu Sep 14 00:07:48 2023
    On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 4:49:03 AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 9:29:17 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 7:18:22 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.

    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential elections.

    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of 'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault' and these 'poor, displaced people' have no
    other option, have they?

    Of course they do.

    <snipped reference to twaddle>

    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind storms,
    and torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all. They'
    re now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe
    catastrophic weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.

    Let's just assume all the above nonsense is true for a moment. What phenomenon do you attribute this 'climate catastrophe' to ultimately, pray tell?

    Fundamentally it is due to this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_energy_budget

    Regardless of the debate about exactly what's causing this, the imbalance is in fact there and measured with great precision by multiple satellite constellations.

    As long as the incoming energy exceeds the outgoing, Earth will continue to get warmer. And there's stuff happening on Earth, like methane release due to tundra melt, that accelerates the warming.

    I don't buy it. My own lengthy and extensive investigations show that whilst I can't rule out some amount of warming, I *can* rule out CO2 and methane levels as a culprit. Electron warming of the ionosphere due to the massive increase in broadcast
    emissions since about 1920 far better fits the data.

    Largely because Cursitor Doom's lengthy, extensive and totally incompetent investigations ignore modern data - he likes to claim that it all faked - that show he is talking utter bollocks.

    Fred Bloggs enthusiasm for energy imbalance is equally daft. The core of the earth can store a huge amount of heat without getting significant warmer, while we live on the thin skin on the surface which has a rather shorter thermal time constant.

    The only way global warming can heat the core is by reducing the temperature gradient to the surface, and by a very minuscule amount. So the internally generated thermal energy stabilizes at an immeasurably higher temperature.

    Not "measurably high" though the measurements are indirect.

    https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/core/

    The surface of the inner core is the hottest area, at 6,000° Celsius (which happens to be the same as the surface of the sun), while the centre of the inner core is a bit cooler about 5,200° Celsius. The iron in the liquid outer core absorbs energy
    when it condenses to form the rigid inner core material, so it is a bit cooler,

    Since geothermal energy contributes 100ths of a percent of total global energy input, your idea is totally wackadoodle.

    On the contrary, it is perfectly sound thermodynamics, which you don't seem to know enough to understand.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydhey

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Cursitor Doom on Thu Sep 14 00:17:20 2023
    On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 8:46:58 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:26:05 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 5:18:22?PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote: >> >> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    <snip>

    I don't buy it. My own lengthy and extensive investigations show that
    whilst I can't rule out some amount of warming, I *can* rule out CO2
    and methane levels as a culprit. Electron warming of the ionosphere
    due to the massive increase in broadcast emissions since about 1920
    far better fits the data.

    You do understand the science has uncovered atmospheric fossils in the form of air bubbles trapped in 100 million year old ice? Methane and CO2 play a very strong role in warming as well as cooling. You don't have to go back nearly as far in time to
    find a complete absence of broadcast emissions.

    It's called "ice core data"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_core

    Sorry, Fred, but the "greenhouse gas" theory of warming is total garbage and there is *zero* correlation between CO2 levels and temperature.

    Cursitor Doom is utterly confident of the correctness of his lunatic delusions.

    For the avoidance of doubt, let me repeat that once more: *ZERO* correlation. *If* warming is happening, you need to identify a
    different culprit for the phenomenon.

    Ask any demented idiot. The scientific community doesn't share this demented delusion. The fossil carbon extraction industry does try to popularise it - they've made a lot of money out of digging up fossil carbon and selling it to be burnt to release
    energy and CO2 and are happy to ignore the consequences if they can keep on making money that way.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?w5bDtiBUaWli?=@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Thu Sep 14 01:29:12 2023
    On Wednesday, 13 September 2023 at 21:26:12 UTC+3, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 5:18:22 PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.
    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate
    figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential >> >> elections.
    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate
    catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of
    'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault' >> >> and these 'poor, displaced people' have no other option, have they? >> >> Camp of the Saints, anyone?

    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind storms,
    and torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all. They'
    re now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe
    catastrophic weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.
    Let's just assume all the above nonsense is true for a moment. What
    phenomenon do you attribute this 'climate catastrophe' to ultimately, >> pray tell?

    Fundamentally it is due to this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_energy_budget

    Regardless of the debate about exactly what's causing this, the imbalance is in fact there and measured with great precision by multiple satellite constellations.

    As long as the incoming energy exceeds the outgoing, Earth will continue to get warmer. And there's stuff happening on Earth, like methane release due to tundra melt, that accelerates the warming.
    I don't buy it. My own lengthy and extensive investigations show that whilst I can't rule out some amount of warming, I *can* rule out CO2
    and methane levels as a culprit. Electron warming of the ionosphere
    due to the massive increase in broadcast emissions since about 1920
    far better fits the data.

    You do understand the science has uncovered atmospheric fossils in the form of air bubbles trapped in 100 million year old ice? Methane and CO2 play a very strong role in warming as well as cooling. You don't have to go back nearly as far in time to
    find a complete absence of broadcast emissions.

    Cite please. AFAIK oldest permafrost found in Antarctica is
    about 2.7 millions years old. From where that 100 million
    year old ice was taken?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 14 04:25:03 2023
    On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 6:29:19 PM UTC+10, Öö Tiib wrote:
    On Wednesday, 13 September 2023 at 21:26:12 UTC+3, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 5:18:22 PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.
    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate >> >> figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential >> >> elections.
    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate >> >> catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of >> >> 'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault'
    and these 'poor, displaced people' have no other option, have they?
    Camp of the Saints, anyone?

    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind storms,
    and torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all. They'
    re now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe
    catastrophic weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.
    Let's just assume all the above nonsense is true for a moment. What >> phenomenon do you attribute this 'climate catastrophe' to ultimately, >> pray tell?

    Fundamentally it is due to this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_energy_budget

    Regardless of the debate about exactly what's causing this, the imbalance is in fact there and measured with great precision by multiple satellite constellations.

    As long as the incoming energy exceeds the outgoing, Earth will continue to get warmer. And there's stuff happening on Earth, like methane release due to tundra melt, that accelerates the warming.
    I don't buy it. My own lengthy and extensive investigations show that whilst I can't rule out some amount of warming, I *can* rule out CO2
    and methane levels as a culprit. Electron warming of the ionosphere
    due to the massive increase in broadcast emissions since about 1920
    far better fits the data.

    You do understand the science has uncovered atmospheric fossils in the form of air bubbles trapped in 100 million year old ice? Methane and CO2 play a very strong role in warming as well as cooling. You don't have to go back nearly as far in time to
    find a complete absence of broadcast emissions.

    Cite please. AFAIK oldest permafrost found in Antarctica is about 2.7 millions years old. From where that 100 million year old ice was taken?

    Good question.

    https://www.science.org/content/article/record-shattering-27-million-year-old-ice-core-reveals-start-ice-ages

    from 2017 talks about the the 2.7 million year old ice - the URL has lost the decimal point - and points out that it wasn't an ice core from a layered build-up, and relies on radio isotope dating to establish its age.

    I suspect that Fred is guilty of a typo - 100,000 year-old ice is perfectly adequate to take us earlier than Cursitor Doom's potty theories about our feeble radio emissions warming the ionosphere (when the Sun's photosphere has been emitting loads of
    radio-frequency emissions for billions of years).

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Thu Sep 14 08:05:37 2023
    On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 3:07:54 AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 4:49:03 AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 9:29:17 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 7:18:22 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.

    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential elections.

    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of 'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault' and these 'poor, displaced people' have
    no other option, have they?

    Of course they do.

    <snipped reference to twaddle>

    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind storms,
    and torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all. They'
    re now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe
    catastrophic weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.

    Let's just assume all the above nonsense is true for a moment. What phenomenon do you attribute this 'climate catastrophe' to ultimately, pray tell?

    Fundamentally it is due to this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_energy_budget

    Regardless of the debate about exactly what's causing this, the imbalance is in fact there and measured with great precision by multiple satellite constellations.

    As long as the incoming energy exceeds the outgoing, Earth will continue to get warmer. And there's stuff happening on Earth, like methane release due to tundra melt, that accelerates the warming.

    I don't buy it. My own lengthy and extensive investigations show that whilst I can't rule out some amount of warming, I *can* rule out CO2 and methane levels as a culprit. Electron warming of the ionosphere due to the massive increase in
    broadcast emissions since about 1920 far better fits the data.

    Largely because Cursitor Doom's lengthy, extensive and totally incompetent investigations ignore modern data - he likes to claim that it all faked - that show he is talking utter bollocks.

    Fred Bloggs enthusiasm for energy imbalance is equally daft. The core of the earth can store a huge amount of heat without getting significant warmer, while we live on the thin skin on the surface which has a rather shorter thermal time constant.

    The only way global warming can heat the core is by reducing the temperature gradient to the surface, and by a very minuscule amount. So the internally generated thermal energy stabilizes at an immeasurably higher temperature.

    Not "measurably high" though the measurements are indirect.

    https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/core/

    The surface of the inner core is the hottest area, at 6,000° Celsius (which happens to be the same as the surface of the sun), while the centre of the inner core is a bit cooler about 5,200° Celsius. The iron in the liquid outer core absorbs energy
    when it condenses to form the rigid inner core material, so it is a bit cooler,


    Right- so that makes it a one way pathway for heat generated in the core to make it to the surface. The shallow surface isn't uniform in its composition or alteration due to weather, but you don't have to go too deep- compared to the planet radius-
    before it is. Earth is strictly a net source of geothermal energy emission, not a sink.

    Since geothermal energy contributes 100ths of a percent of total global energy input, your idea is totally wackadoodle.
    On the contrary, it is perfectly sound thermodynamics, which you don't seem to know enough to understand.


    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydhey

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fred Bloggs@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 14 08:12:23 2023
    On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 4:29:19 AM UTC-4, Öö Tiib wrote:
    On Wednesday, 13 September 2023 at 21:26:12 UTC+3, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 5:18:22 PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.
    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate >> >> figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential >> >> elections.
    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate >> >> catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of >> >> 'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault'
    and these 'poor, displaced people' have no other option, have they?
    Camp of the Saints, anyone?

    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind storms,
    and torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all. They'
    re now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe
    catastrophic weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.
    Let's just assume all the above nonsense is true for a moment. What >> phenomenon do you attribute this 'climate catastrophe' to ultimately, >> pray tell?

    Fundamentally it is due to this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_energy_budget

    Regardless of the debate about exactly what's causing this, the imbalance is in fact there and measured with great precision by multiple satellite constellations.

    As long as the incoming energy exceeds the outgoing, Earth will continue to get warmer. And there's stuff happening on Earth, like methane release due to tundra melt, that accelerates the warming.
    I don't buy it. My own lengthy and extensive investigations show that whilst I can't rule out some amount of warming, I *can* rule out CO2
    and methane levels as a culprit. Electron warming of the ionosphere
    due to the massive increase in broadcast emissions since about 1920
    far better fits the data.

    You do understand the science has uncovered atmospheric fossils in the form of air bubbles trapped in 100 million year old ice? Methane and CO2 play a very strong role in warming as well as cooling. You don't have to go back nearly as far in time to
    find a complete absence of broadcast emissions.

    Cite please. AFAIK oldest permafrost found in Antarctica is
    about 2.7 millions years old. From where that 100 million
    year old ice was taken?

    They can go back further than that:

    https://www.anl.gov/article/unlocking-the-secrets-of-earths-early-atmosphere

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Thu Sep 14 08:36:32 2023
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 1:05:43 AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 3:07:54 AM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 4:49:03 AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 9:29:17 PM UTC-4, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
    On Wednesday, September 13, 2023 at 7:18:22 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
    <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    And they're not beginning to count the billions of international disaster relief.

    But science is just a manmade abstraction, none of this is real, it's all a hoax.

    Yes, Fred, it's a hoax and the people who come up wth the climate figures are the same ones who count the votes in your presidential elections.

    Once the West comes to accept that it's culpable for the 'climate catastrophe' they'll also have to accept hundreds of millions of 'climate refugees' into their homes, because, well, it's 'our fault' and these 'poor, displaced people'
    have no other option, have they?

    Of course they do.

    <snipped reference to twaddle>

    Most of the first world is at higher latitudes causing a delay in the catastrophe. The delay has run its course and ended. The U.S. is fast becoming as big a climate mess as anywhere else. Drought, record heat waves, off the scale wind
    storms, and torrential rainfalls, are now occurring with unprecedented intensity and frequency, causing enormous damage. The federal crop insurance fund is nearly bankrupt, the FEMA disaster relief fund is depleted. It is not looking good for them at all.
    They're now rushing the better part of a $ billion in aid to Libya where many thousands of people have perished in a massive flash flood caused by a downpour that was something like 5x their entire annual rain. People have been programmed to believe
    catastrophic weather always subsides and eventually goes away. Unfortunately, this not a weather phenomenon, it is a climate phenomenon, and climates don't subside and go away, they become the new abnormal.

    Let's just assume all the above nonsense is true for a moment. What phenomenon do you attribute this 'climate catastrophe' to ultimately, pray tell?

    Fundamentally it is due to this:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_energy_budget

    Regardless of the debate about exactly what's causing this, the imbalance is in fact there and measured with great precision by multiple satellite constellations.

    As long as the incoming energy exceeds the outgoing, Earth will continue to get warmer. And there's stuff happening on Earth, like methane release due to tundra melt, that accelerates the warming.

    I don't buy it. My own lengthy and extensive investigations show that whilst I can't rule out some amount of warming, I *can* rule out CO2 and methane levels as a culprit. Electron warming of the ionosphere due to the massive increase in
    broadcast emissions since about 1920 far better fits the data.

    Largely because Cursitor Doom's lengthy, extensive and totally incompetent investigations ignore modern data - he likes to claim that it all faked - that show he is talking utter bollocks.

    Fred Bloggs enthusiasm for energy imbalance is equally daft. The core of the earth can store a huge amount of heat without getting significant warmer, while we live on the thin skin on the surface which has a rather shorter thermal time constant.

    The only way global warming can heat the core is by reducing the temperature gradient to the surface, and by a very minuscule amount. So the internally generated thermal energy stabilizes at an immeasurably higher temperature.

    Not "measurably high" though the measurements are indirect.

    https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/core/

    The surface of the inner core is the hottest area, at 6,000° Celsius (which happens to be the same as the surface of the sun), while the centre of the inner core is a bit cooler about 5,200° Celsius. The iron in the liquid outer core absorbs energy
    when it condenses to form the rigid inner core material, so it is a bit cooler,

    Right- so that makes it a one way pathway for heat generated in the core to make it to the surface.

    There's nothing one-way about it. The earth's core is heated by radioactive decay so heat flows from the core to the surface, but the conduction path is bidirectional.

    The shallow surface isn't uniform in its composition or alteration due to weather, but you don't have to go too deep- compared to the planet radius- before it is. Earth is strictly a net source of geothermal energy emission, not a sink.

    That doesn't stop the core warming up a bit if the surface gets marginally warmer. It won't be a large increase once you get much below the surface, but it can still store quite a bit of energy.

    Since geothermal energy contributes 100ths of a percent of total global energy input, your idea is totally wackadoodle.

    On the contrary, it is perfectly sound thermodynamics, which you don't seem to know enough about to understand.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydhey

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Fred Bloggs on Thu Sep 14 08:49:56 2023
    On Friday, September 15, 2023 at 1:12:28 AM UTC+10, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 4:29:19 AM UTC-4, Öö Tiib wrote:
    On Wednesday, 13 September 2023 at 21:26:12 UTC+3, Fred Bloggs wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 5:18:22 PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 8:58:13?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 4:12:20?AM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
    On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs <bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:

    <snip>

    You do understand the science has uncovered atmospheric fossils in the form of air bubbles trapped in 100 million year old ice? Methane and CO2 play a very strong role in warming as well as cooling. You don't have to go back nearly as far in time
    to find a complete absence of broadcast emissions.

    Cite please. AFAIK oldest permafrost found in Antarctica is about 2.7 millions years old. From where that 100 million
    year old ice was taken?

    They can go back further than that:

    https://www.anl.gov/article/unlocking-the-secrets-of-earths-early-atmosphere

    But that's not air-bubbles. They were looking at the oxidation state of peridotite (a rock from earth's mantle rather than its crust). That does tell you about earth's very early atmosphere - about 4.5 billion years ago accordign to the article - but it'
    s not remotely useful in pointing out that Cursitor Doom is a half-wit.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)