On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 3:53:44 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:happen.
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:44:25 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 7:32:16 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote:
https://www.wired.com/2015/07/still-best-theory-mh370/
https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/missing-jet/mh370-lawsuit-suggests-electrical-failures-led-crash-n730571Ambulance chaser logic. The plane went done, Boeing is worth suing, so it makes sense to allege that there was a defect in the design of the plane.
It's not evidence about what did go wrong, merely speculation about what might have gone wrong. The "best theory" is still just a theory, and will stay that way until we find enough of the wreckage to learn more. which seems unlikely to
turn, can cause the phone to ignite. According to the AAIB, a lithium battery is more likely to catch fire during or just after charging. At the time of the incident, the passenger had plugged the phone in.Concerning an electrical fire, what about these 2 photos which show burn/scorch marks?:
https://www.cnn.com/2016/09/12/asia/mh370-fire-madagascar-blaine-gibson/index.html
They show discolorations. You can use an electron microscope set up to generate X-ray fluorescence from discolored areas to work out what is creating the funny colors.
The report doesn't mention the results of any such tests, so nobody seems to be taking the question seriously. I'm not going to either.
According to a lady on a yacht:
- I was looking at what appeared to be an elongated plane glowing bright orange, with a trail of black smoke behind it.
https://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/f108/i-think-i-saw-mh370-127132.html
But nobody seems to have taken her seriously. You do get lots of attention-seeking behavior after big news stories.
As for the orange glow:
- The senior cabin crew member was summoned. At that point, a hiss was heard before a "tornado" of smoke appeared, accompanied by an orange glow....When phones are crushed or deformed, it can cause a lithium battery to become pierced. This, in
the dubious quality of its "journanlism".https://simpleflying.com/british-airways-787-iphone-fire/
Somebody else's minor disaster, with no obvious relevance to this major one.
And what about this witness:
- There was no noise, just black smoke as a result of fires before it crashed into the water. There was a strong smell of acidic fumes in the air before the plane went down, he added.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6597725/Fisherman-claims-SAW-MH370-recorded-EXACT-location-GPS.htmlBut it's the Daily Mail, in 2019. The "witness" might have recorded an exact GPS location. but either nobody took him seriously enough to look for wreckage from the plane around there, or they looked and didn't find any. The Daily Mail is infamous for
<snipped more speculation about lithium ion batteries>
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:can cause the phone to ignite. According to the AAIB, a lithium battery is more likely to catch fire during or just after charging. At the time of the incident, the passenger had plugged the phone in.
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote:
https://www.wired.com/2015/07/still-best-theory-mh370/
https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/missing-jet/mh370-lawsuit-suggests-electrical-failures-led-crash-n730571Ambulance chaser logic. The plane went done, Boeing is worth suing, so it makes sense to allege that there was a defect in the design of the plane.
It's not evidence about what did go wrong, merely speculation about what might have gone wrong. The "best theory" is still just a theory, and will stay that way until we find enough of the wreckage to learn more. which seems unlikely to happen.
Concerning an electrical fire, what about these 2 photos which show burn/scorch marks?:
https://www.cnn.com/2016/09/12/asia/mh370-fire-madagascar-blaine-gibson/index.htmlThey show discolorations. You can use an electron microscope set up to generate X-ray fluorescence from discolored areas to work out what is creating the funny colors.
The report doesn't mention the results of any such tests, so nobody seems to be taking the question seriously. I'm not going to either.
--According to a lady on a yacht:
Bill Sloman, Sydney
- I was looking at what appeared to be an elongated plane glowing bright orange, with a trail of black smoke behind it.
https://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/f108/i-think-i-saw-mh370-127132.html
As for the orange glow:
- The senior cabin crew member was summoned. At that point, a hiss was heard before a "tornado" of smoke appeared, accompanied by an orange glow....When phones are crushed or deformed, it can cause a lithium battery to become pierced. This, in turn,
https://simpleflying.com/british-airways-787-iphone-fire/
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 2:32:16 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:can cause the phone to ignite. According to the AAIB, a lithium battery is more likely to catch fire during or just after charging. At the time of the incident, the passenger had plugged the phone in.
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote:
https://www.wired.com/2015/07/still-best-theory-mh370/
https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/missing-jet/mh370-lawsuit-suggests-electrical-failures-led-crash-n730571Ambulance chaser logic. The plane went done, Boeing is worth suing, so it makes sense to allege that there was a defect in the design of the plane.
It's not evidence about what did go wrong, merely speculation about what might have gone wrong. The "best theory" is still just a theory, and will stay that way until we find enough of the wreckage to learn more. which seems unlikely to happen.
Concerning an electrical fire, what about these 2 photos which show burn/scorch marks?:
https://www.cnn.com/2016/09/12/asia/mh370-fire-madagascar-blaine-gibson/index.htmlThey show discolorations. You can use an electron microscope set up to generate X-ray fluorescence from discolored areas to work out what is creating the funny colors.
The report doesn't mention the results of any such tests, so nobody seems to be taking the question seriously. I'm not going to either.
--According to a lady on a yacht:
Bill Sloman, Sydney
- I was looking at what appeared to be an elongated plane glowing bright orange, with a trail of black smoke behind it.
https://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/f108/i-think-i-saw-mh370-127132.html
As for the orange glow:
- The senior cabin crew member was summoned. At that point, a hiss was heard before a "tornado" of smoke appeared, accompanied by an orange glow....When phones are crushed or deformed, it can cause a lithium battery to become pierced. This, in turn,
https://simpleflying.com/british-airways-787-iphone-fire/https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-deadly-cargo-inside-mh370-how-exploding-batteries-explain-the-mystery
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 2:38:29 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:happen.
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 2:32:16 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote:
https://www.wired.com/2015/07/still-best-theory-mh370/
https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/missing-jet/mh370-lawsuit-suggests-electrical-failures-led-crash-n730571Ambulance chaser logic. The plane went done, Boeing is worth suing, so it makes sense to allege that there was a defect in the design of the plane.
It's not evidence about what did go wrong, merely speculation about what might have gone wrong. The "best theory" is still just a theory, and will stay that way until we find enough of the wreckage to learn more. which seems unlikely to
Concerning an electrical fire, what about these 2 photos which show burn/scorch marks?:
https://www.cnn.com/2016/09/12/asia/mh370-fire-madagascar-blaine-gibson/index.htmlThey show discolorations. You can use an electron microscope set up to generate X-ray fluorescence from discolored areas to work out what is creating the funny colors.
The report doesn't mention the results of any such tests, so nobody seems to be taking the question seriously. I'm not going to either.
- MH370 had 440 pounds of lithium batteries aboard the Boeing 777 that disappeared March 8, 2014...
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/aviation-expert-presents-theory-happened-194300991.html
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 3:58:47 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 10:53:44 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:<snip>
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:44:25 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 7:32:16 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote:
https://www.wired.com/2015/07/still-best-theory-mh370/
And this:
- Battery acid smells like rotten eggs or burnt rubber, and it has a strong acidic odor ...
https://www.tycorun.com/blogs/news/how-to-spot-battery-leaking-acid-helpful-guide-to-dispose-a-leaking-batteryThis is a lead-acid car battery. You've been speculating about lithium ion batteries which you find in mobile phones which do get carried on to aircraft, but don't seem to blow them up.
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 7:43:34 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:happen.
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 2:38:29 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 2:32:16 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote:
https://www.wired.com/2015/07/still-best-theory-mh370/
https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/missing-jet/mh370-lawsuit-suggests-electrical-failures-led-crash-n730571Ambulance chaser logic. The plane went done, Boeing is worth suing, so it makes sense to allege that there was a defect in the design of the plane.
It's not evidence about what did go wrong, merely speculation about what might have gone wrong. The "best theory" is still just a theory, and will stay that way until we find enough of the wreckage to learn more. which seems unlikely to
reason to take him seriously.Concerning an electrical fire, what about these 2 photos which show burn/scorch marks?:
https://www.cnn.com/2016/09/12/asia/mh370-fire-madagascar-blaine-gibson/index.htmlThey show discolorations. You can use an electron microscope set up to generate X-ray fluorescence from discolored areas to work out what is creating the funny colors.
<snip>The report doesn't mention the results of any such tests, so nobody seems to be taking the question seriously. I'm not going to either.
- MH370 had 440 pounds of lithium batteries aboard the Boeing 777 that disappeared March 8, 2014...
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/aviation-expert-presents-theory-happened-194300991.htmlThat does seem to be Clive Irving's explanation. He's a journalist, not an aviation expert. A consignment of lithium batteries is unlikely to be shipped fully charged, and new batteries are very unlikely to go into thermal runaway. Again, there's no
You can believe any lunatic theory you like, but give up on boosting it here. As I've already pointed out, it make you look foolish, and there's no real point in touting in a forum that is aimed a people interested in electronic design. We've allexploited rechargable batteries from time to time, but nobody has reported ever managing to set one on fire.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Sunday, 10 September 2023 at 12:04:14 UTC+1, Anthony William Sloman wrote:happen.
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 7:43:34 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 2:38:29 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 2:32:16 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote:
https://www.wired.com/2015/07/still-best-theory-mh370/
https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/missing-jet/mh370-lawsuit-suggests-electrical-failures-led-crash-n730571Ambulance chaser logic. The plane went done, Boeing is worth suing, so it makes sense to allege that there was a defect in the design of the plane.
It's not evidence about what did go wrong, merely speculation about what might have gone wrong. The "best theory" is still just a theory, and will stay that way until we find enough of the wreckage to learn more. which seems unlikely to
reason to take him seriously.Concerning an electrical fire, what about these 2 photos which show burn/scorch marks?:
https://www.cnn.com/2016/09/12/asia/mh370-fire-madagascar-blaine-gibson/index.htmlThey show discolorations. You can use an electron microscope set up to generate X-ray fluorescence from discolored areas to work out what is creating the funny colors.
<snip>The report doesn't mention the results of any such tests, so nobody seems to be taking the question seriously. I'm not going to either.
- MH370 had 440 pounds of lithium batteries aboard the Boeing 777 that disappeared March 8, 2014...
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/aviation-expert-presents-theory-happened-194300991.htmlThat does seem to be Clive Irving's explanation. He's a journalist, not an aviation expert. A consignment of lithium batteries is unlikely to be shipped fully charged, and new batteries are very unlikely to go into thermal runaway. Again, there's no
I'm not so sure about your second point. I was told by somebody with first hand knowledge of
the matter that early failures do happen and that manufacturers used to quarantine batteries
for a few days before shipping them. Now, they tend to ship as soon as possible which means that
failures in transit may be more likely.
exploited rechargable batteries from time to time, but nobody has reported ever managing to set one on fire.You can believe any lunatic theory you like, but give up on boosting it here. As I've already pointed out, it make you look foolish, and there's no real point in touting in a forum that is aimed a people interested in electronic design. We've all
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 12:12:09 AM UTC+10, John Walliker wrote:happen.
On Sunday, 10 September 2023 at 12:04:14 UTC+1, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 7:43:34 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 2:38:29 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 2:32:16 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote:
https://www.wired.com/2015/07/still-best-theory-mh370/
https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/missing-jet/mh370-lawsuit-suggests-electrical-failures-led-crash-n730571Ambulance chaser logic. The plane went done, Boeing is worth suing, so it makes sense to allege that there was a defect in the design of the plane.
It's not evidence about what did go wrong, merely speculation about what might have gone wrong. The "best theory" is still just a theory, and will stay that way until we find enough of the wreckage to learn more. which seems unlikely to
no reason to take him seriously.Concerning an electrical fire, what about these 2 photos which show burn/scorch marks?:
https://www.cnn.com/2016/09/12/asia/mh370-fire-madagascar-blaine-gibson/index.htmlThey show discolorations. You can use an electron microscope set up to generate X-ray fluorescence from discolored areas to work out what is creating the funny colors.
<snip>The report doesn't mention the results of any such tests, so nobody seems to be taking the question seriously. I'm not going to either.
- MH370 had 440 pounds of lithium batteries aboard the Boeing 777 that disappeared March 8, 2014...
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/aviation-expert-presents-theory-happened-194300991.htmlThat does seem to be Clive Irving's explanation. He's a journalist, not an aviation expert. A consignment of lithium batteries is unlikely to be shipped fully charged, and new batteries are very unlikely to go into thermal runaway. Again, there's
has just got a Ph.D. in lithium battery chemistry. The field has moved on a lot in recent years.I'm not so sure about your second point. I was told by somebody with first hand knowledge ofIt more likely means that they check them for self-heating as they come off the production line and sling out any potential early failures rapidly.
the matter that early failures do happen and that manufacturers used to quarantine batteries
for a few days before shipping them. Now, they tend to ship as soon as possible which means that
failures in transit may be more likely.
Paying for quarantine space is expensive, and would justify spending money on test gear that could get the result faster.
Better production techniques might have just eliminated the problem. Producing better batteries faster does involve understanding what you are doing in more detail - one of my undergraduate friends has a granddaughter who is about to marry a guy who
exploited rechargable batteries from time to time, but nobody has reported ever managing to set one on fire.You can believe any lunatic theory you like, but give up on boosting it here. As I've already pointed out, it make you look foolish, and there's no real point in touting in a forum that is aimed a people interested in electronic design. We've all
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 8:44:02 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:to happen.
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 12:12:09 AM UTC+10, John Walliker wrote:
On Sunday, 10 September 2023 at 12:04:14 UTC+1, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 7:43:34 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 2:38:29 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 2:32:16 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote:
https://www.wired.com/2015/07/still-best-theory-mh370/
https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/missing-jet/mh370-lawsuit-suggests-electrical-failures-led-crash-n730571Ambulance chaser logic. The plane went done, Boeing is worth suing, so it makes sense to allege that there was a defect in the design of the plane.
It's not evidence about what did go wrong, merely speculation about what might have gone wrong. The "best theory" is still just a theory, and will stay that way until we find enough of the wreckage to learn more. which seems unlikely
no reason to take him seriously.Concerning an electrical fire, what about these 2 photos which show burn/scorch marks?:
https://www.cnn.com/2016/09/12/asia/mh370-fire-madagascar-blaine-gibson/index.htmlThey show discolorations. You can use an electron microscope set up to generate X-ray fluorescence from discolored areas to work out what is creating the funny colors.
<snip>The report doesn't mention the results of any such tests, so nobody seems to be taking the question seriously. I'm not going to either.
- MH370 had 440 pounds of lithium batteries aboard the Boeing 777 that disappeared March 8, 2014...
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/aviation-expert-presents-theory-happened-194300991.htmlThat does seem to be Clive Irving's explanation. He's a journalist, not an aviation expert. A consignment of lithium batteries is unlikely to be shipped fully charged, and new batteries are very unlikely to go into thermal runaway. Again, there's
has just got a Ph.D. in lithium battery chemistry. The field has moved on a lot in recent years.I'm not so sure about your second point. I was told by somebody with first hand knowledge ofIt more likely means that they check them for self-heating as they come off the production line and sling out any potential early failures rapidly.
the matter that early failures do happen and that manufacturers used to quarantine batteries
for a few days before shipping them. Now, they tend to ship as soon as possible which means that
failures in transit may be more likely.
Paying for quarantine space is expensive, and would justify spending money on test gear that could get the result faster.
Better production techniques might have just eliminated the problem. Producing better batteries faster does involve understanding what you are doing in more detail - one of my undergraduate friends has a granddaughter who is about to marry a guy who
exploited rechargable batteries from time to time, but nobody has reported ever managing to set one on fire.You can believe any lunatic theory you like, but give up on boosting it here. As I've already pointed out, it make you look foolish, and there's no real point in touting in a forum that is aimed a people interested in electronic design. We've all
--The danger of fires hasn't been extinguished:
Bill Sloman, Sydney
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zS6dwGFv5HI&t=23s
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 11:01:57 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 8:44:02 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 12:12:09 AM UTC+10, John Walliker wrote:
On Sunday, 10 September 2023 at 12:04:14 UTC+1, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 7:43:34 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 2:38:29 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 2:32:16 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote:
"Covered Up! - China's Electric Car Safety - You're Being Sold a Lie!"
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 7:30:14 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 11:01:57 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:<snip>
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 8:44:02 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 12:12:09 AM UTC+10, John Walliker wrote:
On Sunday, 10 September 2023 at 12:04:14 UTC+1, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 7:43:34 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 2:38:29 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 2:32:16 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote:
"Covered Up! - China's Electric Car Safety - You're Being Sold a Lie!"And gggg gggg is the guy selling it.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 10:01:24 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 7:30:14 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 11:01:57 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:<snip>
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 8:44:02 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 12:12:09 AM UTC+10, John Walliker wrote:
On Sunday, 10 September 2023 at 12:04:14 UTC+1, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 7:43:34 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 2:38:29 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 2:32:16 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote:
"Covered Up! - China's Electric Car Safety - You're Being Sold a Lie!"
And gggg gggg is the guy selling it.
https://giphy.com/gifs/star-trek-vulcan-mr-spock-4APAe5Vw4xHGM
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:05:24 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 10:01:24 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 7:30:14 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 11:01:57 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:<snip>
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 8:44:02 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 12:12:09 AM UTC+10, John Walliker wrote:
On Sunday, 10 September 2023 at 12:04:14 UTC+1, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 7:43:34 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 2:38:29 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 2:32:16 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote:
"Covered Up! - China's Electric Car Safety - You're Being Sold a Lie!"
And gggg gggg is the guy selling it.
https://giphy.com/gifs/star-trek-vulcan-mr-spock-4APAe5Vw4xHGM
Probably not. Gggg gggg doesn't seem to have registered the full extent of my contempt.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 10:19:27 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:05:24 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 10:01:24 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 7:30:14 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 11:01:57 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:<snip>
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 8:44:02 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 12:12:09 AM UTC+10, John Walliker wrote:
On Sunday, 10 September 2023 at 12:04:14 UTC+1, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 7:43:34 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 2:38:29 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 2:32:16 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote:
"Covered Up! - China's Electric Car Safety - You're Being Sold a Lie!"
And gggg gggg is the guy selling it.
https://giphy.com/gifs/star-trek-vulcan-mr-spock-4APAe5Vw4xHGM
Probably not. Gggg gggg doesn't seem to have registered the full extent of my contempt.
https://giphy.com/gifs/movie-quote-cold-blooded-frankly-my-dear-l3V0AVIvgTByXMtZm
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:38:00 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 10:19:27 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 3:05:24 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 10:01:24 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 7:30:14 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 11:01:57 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:<snip>
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 8:44:02 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 12:12:09 AM UTC+10, John Walliker wrote:
On Sunday, 10 September 2023 at 12:04:14 UTC+1, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 7:43:34 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 2:38:29 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 2:32:16 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote:
"Covered Up! - China's Electric Car Safety - You're Being Sold a Lie!"
And gggg gggg is the guy selling it.
https://giphy.com/gifs/star-trek-vulcan-mr-spock-4APAe5Vw4xHGM
Probably not. Gggg gggg doesn't seem to have registered the full extent of my contempt.
https://giphy.com/gifs/movie-quote-cold-blooded-frankly-my-dear-l3V0AVIvgTByXMtZm
And you think I care? About some sook who feels hurt because his silly ideas are not being taken seriously? You are as hopeless as John Larkin, and just as thin-skinned.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 5:27:32 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 10:57:41 PM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 10:32:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 3:58:47 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 10:53:44 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote: >>>>>> On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:44:25 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
<snip>On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 7:32:16 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote: >>>>>>>> On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.wired.com/2015/07/still-best-theory-mh370/
And this:This is a lead-acid car battery. You've been speculating about lithium ion batteries which you find in mobile phones which do get carried on to aircraft, but don't seem to blow them up.
- Battery acid smells like rotten eggs or burnt rubber, and it has a strong acidic odor ...
https://www.tycorun.com/blogs/news/how-to-spot-battery-leaking-acid-helpful-guide-to-dispose-a-leaking-battery
Try not to look like a total idiot.
https://giphy.com/gifs/simongibson2000-harrison-ford-how-dare-you-l378u4r6WniaoO69a
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/380132024788201756/
It's also unkind not to point out to people when they are looking like total > > idiots.
On 9/10/2023 3:50 AM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 5:27:32 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 10:57:41 PM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote: >>> On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 10:32:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 3:58:47 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 10:53:44 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
<snip>On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:44:25 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 7:32:16 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.wired.com/2015/07/still-best-theory-mh370/
And this:This is a lead-acid car battery. You've been speculating about lithium ion batteries which you find in mobile phones which do get carried on to aircraft, but don't seem to blow them up.
- Battery acid smells like rotten eggs or burnt rubber, and it has a strong acidic odor ...
https://www.tycorun.com/blogs/news/how-to-spot-battery-leaking-acid-helpful-guide-to-dispose-a-leaking-battery
Try not to look like a total idiot.
https://giphy.com/gifs/simongibson2000-harrison-ford-how-dare-you-l378u4r6WniaoO69a
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/380132024788201756/
It's also unkind not to point out to people when they are looking like total idiots.
Is that the type of kindness you want done to you?
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 11:28:27 AM UTC+10, ehsjr wrote:
On 9/10/2023 3:50 AM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 5:27:32 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 10:57:41 PM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote: >>> On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 10:32:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 3:58:47 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 10:53:44 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:<snip>
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:44:25 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 7:32:16 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.wired.com/2015/07/still-best-theory-mh370/
And this:This is a lead-acid car battery. You've been speculating about lithium ion batteries which you find in mobile phones which do get carried on to aircraft, but don't seem to blow them up.
- Battery acid smells like rotten eggs or burnt rubber, and it has a strong acidic odor ...
https://www.tycorun.com/blogs/news/how-to-spot-battery-leaking-acid-helpful-guide-to-dispose-a-leaking-battery
Try not to look like a total idiot.
https://giphy.com/gifs/simongibson2000-harrison-ford-how-dare-you-l378u4r6WniaoO69a
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/380132024788201756/
It's also unkind not to point out to people when they are looking like total idiots.
Is that the type of kindness you want done to you?Very much so. It's lot cheaper to be told that you've got something wrong that it is learn it by turning a bad idea into non-working hardware.
I do post "oops" posts from time to time, when I have been told one of my posts has got something wrong. Their tone tends to be grateful and apologetic.
--
Bozo Bill Slowman, Sydney
On Monday, September 11, 2023 at 10:17:59 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, September 12, 2023 at 11:28:27 AM UTC+10, ehsjr wrote:
On 9/10/2023 3:50 AM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 5:27:32 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 10:57:41 PM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 10:32:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Sunday, September 10, 2023 at 3:58:47 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 10:53:44 AM UTC-7, gggg gggg wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:44:25 AM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 7:32:16 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 11:31:35 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 3:23:05 PM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 9:51:18 PM UTC-7, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, September 9, 2023 at 4:43:02 AM UTC+10, gggg gggg wrote:
On Monday, September 4, 2023 at 2:12:50 AM UTC-7, wrote:
It's also unkind not to point out to people when they are looking like total idiots.
Is that the type of kindness you want done to you?
Very much so. It's lot cheaper to be told that you've got something wrong that it is learn it by turning a bad idea into non-working hardware.
I do post "oops" posts from time to time, when I have been told one of my posts has got something wrong. Their tone tends to be grateful and apologetic.
Hey EVERY ONE of your posts is an "Oops", but that IS NOT how you "react" when I point them out. It is more like a wounded animal that lashes out at those that point out your MANY MISTAKES.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 80:37:53 |
| Calls: | 6,716 |
| Files: | 12,247 |
| Messages: | 5,358,011 |