• OT: How is YouTube censoring video comment sections?

    From John Doe@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 26 02:31:30 2022
    You must know how to tell whether your post is shadow banned. I use a
    different browser where I'm not signed in.

    I've been working on this mystery for a while. It's no secret that YouTube
    is shadow banning somewhere around half of replies to original comments
    under videos. But what's their algorithm???

    Seems you can post original anything you want, however long you want, but replies to posts are limited, SOMEHOW.

    I think we can always post a single word reply, but anything more might be shadow banned.

    Big lead?!

    Apparently this is not another mirage... I just copied and pasted someone else's relatively long reply to a comment (to the same original post).

    I suggest instead of "continue" the word should be "increase". It is
    time to grind up the Russian military. Up until about now, from a machiavellian point of view, it made sense to allow Russia to fool
    themselves into thinking they can win. Getting them to commit more
    troops to the effort meant that they would be weakened even more internationally as those troops and equipment are destroyed. Now that
    part has done its work. Now is the time to ensure they gain nothing
    from the effort and can't withdraw the equipment in good order. It is a
    cold hearted view to be sure but on the international stage sometimes
    that is just the way you need to think.

    AND posted the same to another thread without being shadow banned! Copy
    and paste, so it's not to do with manually entered characters. It's not to
    do with Google employee privileges.

    What is special about that post? Two spaces after sentences? No all caps
    words, but I've tried that plenty of times. The use of quotation marks?
    Cannot be proper spelling, because I never make spelling mistakes (speech recognition).

    Maybe it's the phrase "Now is the time". I like that phrase... What other
    crazy thing could it be? If it is a phrase, how to figure out what phrase
    it is?

    Politics? Can they figure out that with an algorithm? It's done too
    quickly and wouldn't be feasible via human censors.

    Seems some of my short posts can be repeated and they always get through (without being shadow banned). Don't see anything special about them
    either.

    Might be some formatting rules. Maybe two spaces after sentences is part
    of whatever it is. I always single space.

    But then, I just copied and pasted another relatively long reply (in a different thread) with only single spacing, and it posted...

    My parents were narcissists and they ruled exactly like pootin. No
    empathy, just what you can use people for, and living (and dying) like
    pigs. It's weird that the narcissist mindset is so universal. And in my family many are still in denial, the parents were heroes. It's really
    like a cult, no one will be able to change the russian people's
    brainwashing. And, like in an abusive family, the people don't discuss
    it with each other. It's bizarre. And, like in my family, the people
    cannot see that pootin despises them.

    What is their algorithm...

    Apparently a clue can be had by simply copying and pasting somebody's relatively long reply. So that means it is something in the post, but what
    is it... Those two posts do look somewhat similar in writing style.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 26 03:23:18 2022
    Shadow banning might not occur under some videos, like cute and fluffy videos about nonpolitical things. You can tell by looking at the numeral, then
    expand to see how many replies there actually are. Under politically charged videos, there will be up to about 50% fewer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadenc@21:1/5 to John Doe on Thu May 26 04:34:08 2022
    John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in
    news:t6mrr6$vi4$1@dont-email.me:

    Shadow banning might not occur under some videos, like cute and
    fluffy videos about nonpolitical things. You can tell by looking
    at the numeral, then expand to see how many replies there actually
    are. Under politically charged videos, there will be up to about
    50% fewer.


    It is not shadow banning, you fucking retard.

    Just like a private business and a mask requisite... They can
    refuse you entry to the store or eatery.

    The poster of a YouTubw video has exclusive rights to delete ANY
    comment for ANY reason at ANY time.

    It has not a goddamned thing to do with YouTube. ANY comment
    deletion is 100% the action of the video author and poster.
    YouTube has an option to flag posts with profanity, etc. but the
    author still remains the person performing any kills on comments.

    You pathetic, cringing milksop!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadenc@21:1/5 to John Dope on Thu May 26 04:28:40 2022
    John Dope <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:t6moq2$95u$2@dont-email.me:

    It's no secret that
    YouTube is shadow banning somewhere around half of replies to
    original comments under videos. But what's their algorithm???


    More John Dope utter stupidity. More proof that your statistical
    analysis aptitude needs much work.

    Every comment I ever made on every YouTube vid I ever commented on
    are all still there (hundreds). And trust me, I make some pretty rude
    replies at times. They are still there.

    You are shadow tarded by an orange skin, yellow hair criminal utter
    idiot. Naaaaahhh... you were that stupid before Trump came along.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadenc on Thu May 26 12:50:54 2022
    Always Wrong, the utterly foulmouthed group idiot, adding absolutely
    NOTHING but insults to this thread, as usual...


    DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

    John Dope <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:t6moq2$95u$2@dont-email.me:

    It's no secret that
    YouTube is shadow banning somewhere around half of replies to
    original comments under videos. But what's their algorithm???


    More John Dope utter stupidity. More proof that your statistical
    analysis aptitude needs much work.

    Every comment I ever made on every YouTube vid I ever commented on
    are all still there (hundreds). And trust me, I make some pretty rude replies at times. They are still there.

    You are shadow tarded by an orange skin, yellow hair criminal utter
    idiot. Naaaaahhh... you were that stupid before Trump came along.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadenc on Thu May 26 12:51:45 2022
    Always Wrong has NO IDEA what it's talking about here...


    DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

    John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:t6mrr6$vi4$1@dont-email.me:

    Shadow banning might not occur under some videos, like cute and
    fluffy videos about nonpolitical things. You can tell by looking
    at the numeral, then expand to see how many replies there actually
    are. Under politically charged videos, there will be up to about
    50% fewer.


    It is not shadow banning, you fucking retard.

    Just like a private business and a mask requisite... They can
    refuse you entry to the store or eatery.

    The poster of a YouTubw video has exclusive rights to delete ANY
    comment for ANY reason at ANY time.

    It has not a goddamned thing to do with YouTube. ANY comment
    deletion is 100% the action of the video author and poster.
    YouTube has an option to flag posts with profanity, etc. but the
    author still remains the person performing any kills on comments.

    You pathetic, cringing milksop!


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to John Doe on Thu May 26 15:37:30 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    Off topic troll.

    --
    John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:

    Path: not-for-mail
    From: John Doe <always.look@message.header>
    Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
    Subject: OT: How is YouTube censoring video comment sections?
    Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 02:31:30 -0000 (UTC)
    Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
    Lines: 69
    Message-ID: <t6moq2$95u$2@dont-email.me>
    Injection-Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 02:31:30 -0000 (UTC)
    Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d55e9c6527754d85dc511d197cef6408";
    logging-data="9406"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+mYT50Lc2Fu+xH3ZORdsuiK3jYJfXBPEA="
    User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.05
    Cancel-Lock: sha1:BjYu6r3ktq2jaLSQCSvhXJs541A=
    X-Received-Bytes: 4237

    You must know how to tell whether your post is shadow banned. I use a different browser where I'm not signed in.

    I've been working on this mystery for a while. It's no secret that YouTube
    is shadow banning somewhere around half of replies to original comments
    under videos. But what's their algorithm???

    Seems you can post original anything you want, however long you want, but replies to posts are limited, SOMEHOW.

    I think we can always post a single word reply, but anything more might be shadow banned.

    Big lead?!

    Apparently this is not another mirage... I just copied and pasted someone else's relatively long reply to a comment (to the same original post).

    I suggest instead of "continue" the word should be "increase". It is
    time to grind up the Russian military. Up until about now, from a machiavellian point of view, it made sense to allow Russia to fool themselves into thinking they can win. Getting them to commit more
    troops to the effort meant that they would be weakened even more internationally as those troops and equipment are destroyed. Now that
    part has done its work. Now is the time to ensure they gain nothing
    from the effort and can't withdraw the equipment in good order. It is a cold hearted view to be sure but on the international stage sometimes
    that is just the way you need to think.

    AND posted the same to another thread without being shadow banned! Copy
    and paste, so it's not to do with manually entered characters. It's not to
    do with Google employee privileges.

    What is special about that post? Two spaces after sentences? No all caps words, but I've tried that plenty of times. The use of quotation marks? Cannot be proper spelling, because I never make spelling mistakes (speech recognition).

    Maybe it's the phrase "Now is the time". I like that phrase... What other crazy thing could it be? If it is a phrase, how to figure out what phrase
    it is?

    Politics? Can they figure out that with an algorithm? It's done too
    quickly and wouldn't be feasible via human censors.

    Seems some of my short posts can be repeated and they always get through (without being shadow banned). Don't see anything special about them
    either.

    Might be some formatting rules. Maybe two spaces after sentences is part
    of whatever it is. I always single space.

    But then, I just copied and pasted another relatively long reply (in a different thread) with only single spacing, and it posted...

    My parents were narcissists and they ruled exactly like pootin. No
    empathy, just what you can use people for, and living (and dying) like pigs. It's weird that the narcissist mindset is so universal. And in my family many are still in denial, the parents were heroes. It's really
    like a cult, no one will be able to change the russian people's brainwashing. And, like in an abusive family, the people don't discuss
    it with each other. It's bizarre. And, like in my family, the people
    cannot see that pootin despises them.

    What is their algorithm...

    Apparently a clue can be had by simply copying and pasting somebody's relatively long reply. So that means it is something in the post, but what
    is it... Those two posts do look somewhat similar in writing style.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Edward Hernandez@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 26 16:13:04 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id <svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me>
    (http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=164904625100) posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022
    08:01:09 -0000 (UTC):

    Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
    except insults to this group.

    Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
    to USENET (**) has been 59.9% of its posts contributing "nothing except insults" to USENET.

    ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
    least 1512 articles to USENET. Of which 164 have been pure insults and
    742 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.

    The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

    The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

    And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

    The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
    breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
    CLUELESS...

    And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
    Thu, 26 May 2022 15:37:30 GMT in message-id <_8NjK.1010037$I_K3.530118@usenetxs.com>).

    NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.

    This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
    readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
    follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

    Y2Nq5fuBidLG

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to John Doe on Thu May 26 16:08:23 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    Edward "Porn Sucking" Hernandez is trying very hard to be a troll on
    USENET, but failing. At least here it's taking the initiative instead of
    being a 100% reactionary retard.

    Eddie has never posted anything NORMAL except when it got spanked...

    https://groups.google.com/g/sci.electronics.repair/c/MesPLcGU4BE

    See also...
    John Doe <always.look@message.header> (Astraweb, Aioe.org)
    Peter Weiner <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
    Edward H. <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
    Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>

    Eddie is an example for all newbies. Don't get spanked!

    Spanked Eddie...

    --
    John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:

    Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!178.20.174.213.MISMATCH!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!peer03.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!
    fx14.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
    From: John Doe <always.look@message.header>
    Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
    Subject: OT: How is YouTube censoring video comment sections?
    Followup-To: alt.test.group
    Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
    References: <t6moq2$95u$2@dont-email.me>
    User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.05
    Lines: 90
    Message-ID: <_8NjK.1010037$I_K3.530118@usenetxs.com>
    X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
    NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 15:37:30 UTC
    Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 15:37:30 GMT
    X-Received-Bytes: 4832
    Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:669957 free.spam:18463

    Off topic troll.

    --
    John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:

    Path: not-for-mail
    From: John Doe <always.look@message.header>
    Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
    Subject: OT: How is YouTube censoring video comment sections?
    Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 02:31:30 -0000 (UTC)
    Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
    Lines: 69
    Message-ID: <t6moq2$95u$2@dont-email.me>
    Injection-Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 02:31:30 -0000 (UTC)
    Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d55e9c6527754d85dc511d197cef6408";
    logging-data="9406"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+mYT50Lc2Fu+xH3ZORdsuiK3jYJfXBPEA="
    User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.05
    Cancel-Lock: sha1:BjYu6r3ktq2jaLSQCSvhXJs541A=
    X-Received-Bytes: 4237

    You must know how to tell whether your post is shadow banned. I use a
    different browser where I'm not signed in.

    I've been working on this mystery for a while. It's no secret that YouTube >> is shadow banning somewhere around half of replies to original comments
    under videos. But what's their algorithm???

    Seems you can post original anything you want, however long you want, but
    replies to posts are limited, SOMEHOW.

    I think we can always post a single word reply, but anything more might be >> shadow banned.

    Big lead?!

    Apparently this is not another mirage... I just copied and pasted someone
    else's relatively long reply to a comment (to the same original post).

    I suggest instead of "continue" the word should be "increase". It is
    time to grind up the Russian military. Up until about now, from a
    machiavellian point of view, it made sense to allow Russia to fool
    themselves into thinking they can win. Getting them to commit more
    troops to the effort meant that they would be weakened even more
    internationally as those troops and equipment are destroyed. Now that
    part has done its work. Now is the time to ensure they gain nothing
    from the effort and can't withdraw the equipment in good order. It is a >> > cold hearted view to be sure but on the international stage sometimes
    that is just the way you need to think.

    AND posted the same to another thread without being shadow banned! Copy
    and paste, so it's not to do with manually entered characters. It's not to >> do with Google employee privileges.

    What is special about that post? Two spaces after sentences? No all caps
    words, but I've tried that plenty of times. The use of quotation marks?
    Cannot be proper spelling, because I never make spelling mistakes (speech
    recognition).

    Maybe it's the phrase "Now is the time". I like that phrase... What other
    crazy thing could it be? If it is a phrase, how to figure out what phrase
    it is?

    Politics? Can they figure out that with an algorithm? It's done too
    quickly and wouldn't be feasible via human censors.

    Seems some of my short posts can be repeated and they always get through
    (without being shadow banned). Don't see anything special about them
    either.

    Might be some formatting rules. Maybe two spaces after sentences is part
    of whatever it is. I always single space.

    But then, I just copied and pasted another relatively long reply (in a
    different thread) with only single spacing, and it posted...

    My parents were narcissists and they ruled exactly like pootin. No
    empathy, just what you can use people for, and living (and dying) like
    pigs. It's weird that the narcissist mindset is so universal. And in my
    family many are still in denial, the parents were heroes. It's really
    like a cult, no one will be able to change the russian people's
    brainwashing. And, like in an abusive family, the people don't discuss
    it with each other. It's bizarre. And, like in my family, the people
    cannot see that pootin despises them.

    What is their algorithm...

    Apparently a clue can be had by simply copying and pasting somebody's
    relatively long reply. So that means it is something in the post, but what >> is it... Those two posts do look somewhat similar in writing style.




    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Edward Hernandez@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 26 16:13:06 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id <svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me>
    (http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=164904625100) posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022
    08:01:09 -0000 (UTC):

    Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
    except insults to this group.

    Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe's post ratio to
    USENET (**) has been 59.9% of its posts contributing "nothing except
    insults" to USENET.

    ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
    least 1512 articles to USENET. Of which 164 have been pure insults and
    742 have been John Doe "troll format" postings.

    The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

    The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

    And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

    The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
    breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
    CLUELESS...

    And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
    incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Thu, 26 May 2022 16:08:23 -0000
    (UTC) in message-id <t6o8ln$u7h$1@dont-email.me>.

    JIKSOxapKxlV

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadenc@21:1/5 to John Dope on Thu May 26 17:44:41 2022
    John Dope <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:_8NjK.1010037 $I_K3.530118@usenetxs.com:


    Off topic troll.


    Yes, John Dope, you are off topic and you are a troll.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to Edward Hernandez on Thu May 26 20:52:13 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    This porn-sucking retard wants so badly to nym-shift.

    Eddie has never posted anything NORMAL except when it got spanked...

    https://groups.google.com/g/sci.electronics.repair/c/MesPLcGU4BE

    See also...
    John Doe <always.look@message.header> (Astraweb, Aioe.org)
    Peter Weiner <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
    Edward H. <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
    Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>

    Eddie is an example for all newbies. Don't get spanked!

    Spanked Eddie...

    --
    Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote:

    Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx09.ams4.
    POSTED!not-for-mail
    From: Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: OT: How is YouTube censoring video comment sections?
    Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
    References: <t6moq2$95u$2@dont-email.me> <_8NjK.1010037$I_K3.530118@usenetxs.com> <t6o8ln$u7h$1@dont-email.me>
    Lines: 34
    Message-ID: <mGNjK.1603304$Sxe.276467@usenetxs.com>
    X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
    NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 16:13:06 UTC
    Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 16:13:06 GMT
    X-Received-Bytes: 1860
    Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:669963 free.spam:18466

    Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id <svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me>
    (http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=164904625100) posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022
    08:01:09 -0000 (UTC):

    Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
    except insults to this group.

    Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe's post ratio to USENET (**) has been 59.9% of its posts contributing "nothing except
    insults" to USENET.

    ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
    least 1512 articles to USENET. Of which 164 have been pure insults and
    742 have been John Doe "troll format" postings.

    The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

    The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

    And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

    The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
    breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
    CLUELESS...

    And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Thu, 26 May 2022 16:08:23 -0000
    (UTC) in message-id <t6o8ln$u7h$1@dont-email.me>.

    JIKSOxapKxlV




    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Edward Hernandez@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 26 21:01:13 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id <svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me>
    (http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=164904625100) posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022
    08:01:09 -0000 (UTC):

    Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
    except insults to this group.

    Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe's post ratio to
    USENET (**) has been 59.9% of its posts contributing "nothing except
    insults" to USENET.

    ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
    least 1514 articles to USENET. Of which 164 have been pure insults and
    743 have been John Doe "troll format" postings.

    The Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
    <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

    The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

    And the Troll Doe stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

    The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
    breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
    CLUELESS...

    And yet, the clueless Troll Doe has continued to post incorrectly
    formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
    Thu, 26 May 2022 20:52:13 -0000 (UTC) in message-id <t6op9t$v5h$1@dont-email.me>).

    NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.

    This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
    readers who happen by to point out that John Dope does not even follow
    the rules it uses to troll other posters.

    0zQSUuJjRt4c

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadenc on Thu May 26 20:54:06 2022
    Always Wrong is intimidated by my quest.

    It wouldn't know how to tell YouTube's algorithm with its life depended on
    it.


    DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

    John Dope <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:_8NjK.1010037 $I_K3.530118@usenetxs.com:


    Off topic troll.


    Yes, John Dope, you are off topic and you are a troll.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to TomasZ on Thu May 26 22:35:44 2022
    https://youtu.be/2XtZqFF7ZDg

    Original poster is "ian stewart".

    A relatively long reply...

    TomasZ wrote:

    It certainly seems that way, Kremlin will definitely put him on
    essential personnel list along with Tucker and Trump after today.
    Politicians should finally learn the difference between peace and appeasement. ~70 years after WWII we're repeating the same mistakes that
    led to it. I can no longer hold Chamberlain accountable for selling out
    my country but I'll call out anybody who would want follow his
    treacherous and cowardly example.

    Copying and pasting that gets through no problem.

    Now, concentrating on "Tucker and Trump".

    Replacing that with these terms all fail...

    "Hillary Clinton"
    "Joe Biden"
    "Donald Trump"

    But these succeed...

    "Tucker Carlson"
    "Tucker Tucker"

    Hmm... Seems CNN/YouTube like "Tucker" a lot, this works...

    Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker
    Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker
    Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker
    Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker
    Tucker Tucker

    Or maybe they just want him/that to be discussed. Could have to do with
    words they want to see. Like *maybe* Google gives them a little form to
    enter the words they most want to see. Wild guess.





    --

    I wrote:

    You must know how to tell whether your post is shadow banned. I use a different browser where I'm not signed in.

    I've been working on this mystery for a while. It's no secret that
    YouTube is shadow banning somewhere around half of replies to original comments under videos. But what's their algorithm???

    Seems you can post original anything you want, however long you want,
    but replies to posts are limited, SOMEHOW.

    I think we can always post a single word reply, but anything more might
    be shadow banned.

    Big lead?!

    Apparently this is not another mirage... I just copied and pasted
    someone else's relatively long reply to a comment (to the same original post).

    I suggest instead of "continue" the word should be "increase". It is
    time to grind up the Russian military. Up until about now, from a
    machiavellian point of view, it made sense to allow Russia to fool
    themselves into thinking they can win. Getting them to commit more
    troops to the effort meant that they would be weakened even more
    internationally as those troops and equipment are destroyed. Now that
    part has done its work. Now is the time to ensure they gain nothing
    from the effort and can't withdraw the equipment in good order. It is
    a cold hearted view to be sure but on the international stage sometimes
    that is just the way you need to think.

    AND posted the same to another thread without being shadow banned! Copy
    and paste, so it's not to do with manually entered characters. It's not
    to do with Google employee privileges.

    What is special about that post? Two spaces after sentences? No all caps words, but I've tried that plenty of times. The use of quotation marks? Cannot be proper spelling, because I never make spelling mistakes
    (speech recognition).

    Maybe it's the phrase "Now is the time". I like that phrase... What
    other crazy thing could it be? If it is a phrase, how to figure out what phrase it is?

    Politics? Can they figure out that with an algorithm? It's done too
    quickly and wouldn't be feasible via human censors.

    Seems some of my short posts can be repeated and they always get through (without being shadow banned). Don't see anything special about them
    either.

    Might be some formatting rules. Maybe two spaces after sentences is part
    of whatever it is. I always single space.

    But then, I just copied and pasted another relatively long reply (in a different thread) with only single spacing, and it posted...

    My parents were narcissists and they ruled exactly like pootin. No
    empathy, just what you can use people for, and living (and dying) like
    pigs. It's weird that the narcissist mindset is so universal. And in my
    family many are still in denial, the parents were heroes. It's really
    like a cult, no one will be able to change the russian people's
    brainwashing. And, like in an abusive family, the people don't discuss
    it with each other. It's bizarre. And, like in my family, the people
    cannot see that pootin despises them.

    What is their algorithm...

    Apparently a clue can be had by simply copying and pasting somebody's relatively long reply. So that means it is something in the post, but
    what is it... Those two posts do look somewhat similar in writing style.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadenc@21:1/5 to John Dope on Fri May 27 03:43:43 2022
    John Dope <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:t6ovc0$5v6$1@dont-email.me:

    https://youtu.be/2XtZqFF7ZDg

    Original poster is "ian stewart".

    A relatively long reply...

    TomasZ wrote:

    It certainly seems that way, Kremlin will definitely put him on
    essential personnel list along with Tucker and Trump after today.
    Politicians should finally learn the difference between peace and
    appeasement. ~70 years after WWII we're repeating the same
    mistakes that led to it. I can no longer hold Chamberlain
    accountable for selling out my country but I'll call out anybody
    who would want follow his treacherous and cowardly example.

    Copying and pasting that gets through no problem.

    Now, concentrating on "Tucker and Trump".

    Replacing that with these terms all fail...

    "Hillary Clinton"
    "Joe Biden"
    "Donald Trump"

    But these succeed...

    "Tucker Carlson"
    "Tucker Tucker"

    Hmm... Seems CNN/YouTube like "Tucker" a lot, this works...

    Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker
    Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker
    Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker
    Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker
    Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker

    Or maybe they just want him/that to be discussed. Could have to do
    with words they want to see. Like *maybe* Google gives them a
    little form to enter the words they most want to see. Wild guess.

    Again, you retarded fuck. YouTube has NOTHING to do with it.
    If it a CNN video post, it is a CNN person moderating the comments,
    if that is even happenning at all.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadenc@21:1/5 to John Doe on Fri May 27 03:35:04 2022
    John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in
    news:t6opde$v5h$3@dont-email.me:

    Always Wrong is intimidated by my quest.

    It wouldn't know how to tell YouTube's algorithm with its life
    depended on it.


    Again, you retarded fuck. YouTube comment post management is done
    SOLEY by the authors of the posts. Period.

    You stupid fucktard!

    The ONLY thing YouTube manages are the Video posts themselves.
    It does not get more stupid than a Trump Cult retard, but John Dope
    certainly is the bottom of even that dumb motherfucker barrel.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadenc on Fri May 27 13:37:27 2022
    Always Wrong, lying as always...


    DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

    John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:t6opde$v5h$3@dont-email.me:

    Always Wrong is intimidated by my quest.

    It wouldn't know how to tell YouTube's algorithm with its life
    depended on it.


    Again, you retarded fuck. YouTube comment post management is done
    SOLEY by the authors of the posts. Period.

    You stupid fucktard!

    The ONLY thing YouTube manages are the Video posts themselves.
    It does not get more stupid than a Trump Cult retard, but John Dope
    certainly is the bottom of even that dumb motherfucker barrel.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadenc on Fri May 27 13:38:23 2022
    Always Wrong has its panties in a bind here...


    DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

    John Dope <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:t6ovc0$5v6$1@dont-email.me:

    https://youtu.be/2XtZqFF7ZDg

    Original poster is "ian stewart".

    A relatively long reply...

    TomasZ wrote:

    It certainly seems that way, Kremlin will definitely put him on
    essential personnel list along with Tucker and Trump after today.
    Politicians should finally learn the difference between peace and
    appeasement. ~70 years after WWII we're repeating the same
    mistakes that led to it. I can no longer hold Chamberlain
    accountable for selling out my country but I'll call out anybody
    who would want follow his treacherous and cowardly example.

    Copying and pasting that gets through no problem.

    Now, concentrating on "Tucker and Trump".

    Replacing that with these terms all fail...

    "Hillary Clinton"
    "Joe Biden"
    "Donald Trump"

    But these succeed...

    "Tucker Carlson"
    "Tucker Tucker"

    Hmm... Seems CNN/YouTube like "Tucker" a lot, this works...

    Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker
    Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker
    Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker
    Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker
    Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker Tucker

    Or maybe they just want him/that to be discussed. Could have to do
    with words they want to see. Like *maybe* Google gives them a
    little form to enter the words they most want to see. Wild guess.

    Again, you retarded fuck. YouTube has NOTHING to do with it.
    If it a CNN video post, it is a CNN person moderating the comments,
    if that is even happenning at all.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 27 14:57:55 2022
    Ooh!
    Preliminarily...
    Seems they don't like the word "you".

    "you like it" succeeds

    "you are awful" fails

    "I am awful" succeeds

    Maybe YouTube wants a kinder, gentler discussion too, just a different
    means...







    I wrote:

    You must know how to tell whether your post is shadow banned. I use a different browser where I'm not signed in.

    I've been working on this mystery for a while. It's no secret that YouTube
    is shadow banning somewhere around half of replies to original comments
    under videos. But what's their algorithm???

    Seems you can post original anything you want, however long you want, but replies to posts are limited, SOMEHOW.

    I think we can always post a single word reply, but anything more might be shadow banned.

    Big lead?!

    Apparently this is not another mirage... I just copied and pasted someone else's relatively long reply to a comment (to the same original post).

    I suggest instead of "continue" the word should be "increase". It is
    time to grind up the Russian military. Up until about now, from a
    machiavellian point of view, it made sense to allow Russia to fool
    themselves into thinking they can win. Getting them to commit more
    troops to the effort meant that they would be weakened even more
    internationally as those troops and equipment are destroyed. Now that
    part has done its work. Now is the time to ensure they gain nothing
    from the effort and can't withdraw the equipment in good order. It is a
    cold hearted view to be sure but on the international stage sometimes
    that is just the way you need to think.

    AND posted the same to another thread without being shadow banned! Copy
    and paste, so it's not to do with manually entered characters. It's not to
    do with Google employee privileges.

    What is special about that post? Two spaces after sentences? No all caps words, but I've tried that plenty of times. The use of quotation marks? Cannot be proper spelling, because I never make spelling mistakes (speech recognition).

    Maybe it's the phrase "Now is the time". I like that phrase... What other crazy thing could it be? If it is a phrase, how to figure out what phrase
    it is?

    Politics? Can they figure out that with an algorithm? It's done too
    quickly and wouldn't be feasible via human censors.

    Seems some of my short posts can be repeated and they always get through (without being shadow banned). Don't see anything special about them
    either.

    Might be some formatting rules. Maybe two spaces after sentences is part
    of whatever it is. I always single space.

    But then, I just copied and pasted another relatively long reply (in a different thread) with only single spacing, and it posted...

    My parents were narcissists and they ruled exactly like pootin. No
    empathy, just what you can use people for, and living (and dying) like
    pigs. It's weird that the narcissist mindset is so universal. And in my
    family many are still in denial, the parents were heroes. It's really
    like a cult, no one will be able to change the russian people's
    brainwashing. And, like in an abusive family, the people don't discuss
    it with each other. It's bizarre. And, like in my family, the people
    cannot see that pootin despises them.

    What is their algorithm...

    Apparently a clue can be had by simply copying and pasting somebody's relatively long reply. So that means it is something in the post, but what
    is it... Those two posts do look somewhat similar in writing style.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadenc on Fri May 27 16:50:57 2022
    Totally enjoying my 3D printer. Just what I needed to make certain parts, especially spacers and the like. Gunna make foot pegs for my next electric bike, next.

    Hey Always Belligerent, how is your 3D printing experience?

    Given its inability to cope with the minutest bit of stress, even on the Internet where any stress is almost entirely self-induced, without going postal, Always Wrong's chance of success is very small...


    DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

    John Dope <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:t6qotj$5r9$1@dont- email.me:

    Ooh!

    Top posting total retard John Dope is the idiot who should be head
    hobbled, Just like James Caan was foot hobbled in "Misery".

    Hang your head over the end of a table or bed, and strike down on it
    with a big sledge hammer.


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadenc@21:1/5 to John Dope on Fri May 27 16:41:47 2022
    John Dope <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:t6qotj$5r9$1@dont- email.me:

    Ooh!

    Top posting total retard John Dope is the idiot who should be head
    hobbled, Just like James Caan was foot hobbled in "Misery".

    Hang your head over the end of a table or bed, and strike down on it
    with a big sledge hammer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadenc@21:1/5 to John Dope on Sat May 28 03:09:42 2022
    John Dope <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:t6qvhh$ocs$1@dont-email.me:


    Totally enjoying my 3D printer.

    Downloading crap off the internet to print for sure. You are
    obviously too fucking stupid to design your own print jobs.

    Just what I needed to make certain
    parts,

    Like the Trump Cult horse blinders you wear?

    especially spacers and the like.

    Oh boy! 3D print job skill level 0.5!

    I am impressed... NOT!

    Gunna make foot pegs for
    my next electric bike, next.

    Sure... PLA plastic and gussets made from it always handle being
    bolted onto something and then getting subjected to the pressure a
    stupid lard ass like you exhibits.

    Hey Always Belligerent, how is your 3D printing experience?

    You don't even know what the word belligerent means, punk. This
    post is pure proof as this post you made here is you being
    belligerent.

    I print mechanical prototype samples for a project my boss is doing
    for the Navy. I also printed a Z transit mount for my laser
    engraver, since most engravers with diode lasers are fixed focus. I
    also designed and printed bearing hubs for my spools so they
    experience zero drag as the extruder pull on the filament, because
    the factory mounts are big on drag.

    Given its inability

    "Its" do not have abilities. They are inanimate. I am not an it,
    chucko. You get the moniker people bestow on you because of your
    posts. Whatever I call you... you have it coming, twerp. If anyone
    in this group qualifies for the "it" moniker, it is you.

    Dumbfucks like you have low abilities as well, because you mucked up
    all of your firing nuerons with Trump Cult retarded shit. Your
    remaining 15 IQ point remnant does not get much past shoelaces and
    buttwipe acumen.

    to cope with the minutest bit of stress,

    I am not stressed, you stupid Usenet troll fuck. I'll bet your three
    firing nuerons are though.

    even
    on the Internet where any stress is almost entirely self-induced,

    You are mumbling again, boy.

    without going postal,

    I only "go coastal", which is where I go down to the beach and
    relax.
    You really are one bent brained dumbfuck, John Dope.

    Always Wrong's chance of success is very
    small...

    Had you left all the stupid shit out, your post started out OK and
    seemingly civil.

    You then spouted the stupid shit, decidedly proving that you are
    nothing but a stupid shit.

    I'll bet your printer is a lame little POS job, because you are far
    too stupid to research and choose a good one.

    Mine is a 12 X 12 X 13 glass bed monster with dual extruders. It
    sits on 4 pieces of high density foam under its feet to dampen the
    extruder head gantry transitions, severly reducing the noise transfer
    into the dresser and down to the floor I have it set upon.

    I do prototypes for engineering jobs. I perform the 3D CAD
    operations with a very expensive top of the line package called
    SolidEdge by Siemens. Before that, I used the free version of
    AutoCad's "Fusion 360" product.

    You make spacers and failed "footpegs". You probably DLd the job
    from some CAD site you spend you time digging through.

    You wouldn't know what success was if it bit you in your troll ass,
    boy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to John Doe on Mon Jun 13 02:35:38 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    Eddie, the Astraweb porn-sucking retarded forger is flagging every off-topic post with idiotic spam.

    Eddie has never posted anything NORMAL except when it got a spanking...

    https://groups.google.com/g/sci.electronics.repair/c/MesPLcGU4BE

    See also...
    John Doe <always.look_message.header> (Astraweb, Aioe.org)
    Peter Weiner <dtgamer99_gmail.com>
    Edward H. <dtgamer99_gmail.com>
    Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99_gmail.com>

    Eddie is an example for all newbies. Don't get spanked!

    Spanked Eddie...

    --
    John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:

    Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.
    highwinds-media.com!fx11.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
    From: John Doe <always.look@message.header>
    Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10,free.spam
    Subject: Re: OT: How is YouTube censoring video comment sections? Followup-To: alt.test.group
    References: <t6mmeo$u2n$1@dont-email.me> <t6tidd$4ka$1@dont-email.me> <t6trg1$eva$1@dont-email.me> <t71c4v$44t$1@dont-email.me> <t73g58$sus$1@dont-email.me> <t85674$vma$1@dont-email.me>
    Injection-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 22:07:20 -0000 (UTC)
    Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="aefae07b417003b570527823e77a9930"; logging-data="29200"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18QBXYPJWay5G0R7zD10mjY5gUD5xOvt6I="
    User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.05
    Lines: 62
    Message-ID: <tZwpK.177099$heq1.130137@usenetxs.com>
    X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
    NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 02:07:21 UTC
    Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 02:07:21 GMT
    X-Received-Bytes: 3958
    Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org alt.comp.os.windows-10:165932 free.spam:18745

    Off topic troll...

    --
    John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:

    Path: not-for-mail
    From: John Doe <always.look@message.header>
    Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-10
    Subject: Re: OT: How is YouTube censoring video comment sections?
    Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 17:02:29 -0000 (UTC)
    Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
    Lines: 40
    Message-ID: <t85674$vma$1@dont-email.me>
    References: <t6mmeo$u2n$1@dont-email.me> <t6tidd$4ka$1@dont-email.me> <t6trg1$eva$1@dont-email.me> <t71c4v$44t$1@dont-email.me> <t73g58$sus$1@dont-email.me>
    Injection-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 17:02:29 -0000 (UTC)
    Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="743af16c1a39f17b79a9b0b210ea6965";
    logging-data="32458"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+E8L9wAccqAJF5jtSoVbTkvooYAStSHjQ="
    User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.05
    Cancel-Lock: sha1:ooGuDVYEeElpmlywvS+fPYUYM4M=
    X-Received-Bytes: 2827

    This, copied and pasted from the United States Supreme Court, FAILS!!!

    The five Justices who compose today's majority are entirely comfortable
    concluding that every State violated the Constitution for all of the 135
    years between the Fourteenth Amendment's ratification and Massachusetts'
    permitting of same-sex marriages in 2003. They have discovered in the
    Fourteenth Amendment a "fundamental right" overlooked by every person alive >> at the time of ratification, and almost everyone else in the time since.
    They see what lesser legal minds-minds like Thomas Cooley, John Marshall
    Harlan, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Learned Hand, Louis Brandeis, William
    Howard Taft, Benjamin Cardozo, Hugo Black, Felix Frankfurter, Robert
    Jackson, and Henry Friendly-could not. They are certain that the People
    ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to bestow on them the power to remove
    questions from the democratic process when that is called for by their
    "reasoned judgment." These Justices know that limiting marriage to one man >> and one woman is contrary to reason; they know that an institution as old as >> government itself, and accepted by every nation in history until 15 years
    ago, cannot possibly be supported by anything other than ignorance or
    bigotry. And they are willing to say that any citizen who does not agree
    with that, who adheres to what was, until 15 years ago, the unanimous
    judgment of all generations and all societies, stands against the
    Constitution.

    The censorship is not politically motivated against Antonin Scalia's
    opinion. What he says is in jest, the wording supports the other side.

    So what is the problem!




    John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:

    "Russia controlled Ukraine" fails
    "Russia owned Ukraine" succeeds
    "controlled Ukraine" succeeds
    "owned Ukraine" fails

    @#$!




    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Edward Hernandez@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 13 02:35:47 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    Further, John Dope stated the following in message-id <svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me>
    (http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=164904625100) posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022
    08:01:09 -0000 (UTC):

    Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
    except insults to this group.

    Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Dope's post ratio
    to USENET (**) has been 58.5% of its posts contributing "nothing except insults" to USENET.

    ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Dope has posted at
    least 1715 articles to USENET. Of which 173 have been pure insults and
    830 have been John Dope "troll format" postings.

    The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

    The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

    And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

    The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
    breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
    CLUELESS...

    And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
    incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Mon, 13 Jun 2022 02:35:38 -0000
    (UTC) in message-id <t867pq$1ei$2@dont-email.me>.

    This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
    readers who happen by to point out that John Doe does not even follow
    the rules it uses to troll other posters.

    b4uo4Gto4uRD

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to John Doe on Wed Jun 15 18:56:47 2022
    I figured out some more stuff about their algorithm, and it's working
    pretty well.

    Apparently one way to get around it is to say things in ways we don't
    normally say things... And naturally avoid attacking others while doing
    so (although that by itself doesn't solve the problem).

    I have some (IMO amusing) examples of how weird their algorithm is, posted
    in the Windows 10 group under the same subject.

    Disclaimer: Not in any way suggesting anybody should post to YouTube. It's
    an interesting study, for one who enjoys it.






    John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:

    You must know how to tell whether your post is shadow banned. I use a different browser where I'm not signed in.

    I've been working on this mystery for a while. It's no secret that
    YouTube is shadow banning somewhere around half of replies to original comments under videos. But what's their algorithm???

    Seems you can post original anything you want, however long you want,
    but replies to posts are limited, SOMEHOW.

    I think we can always post a single word reply, but anything more might
    be shadow banned.

    Big lead?!

    Apparently this is not another mirage... I just copied and pasted
    someone else's relatively long reply to a comment (to the same original post).

    I suggest instead of "continue" the word should be "increase". It is
    time to grind up the Russian military. Up until about now, from a
    machiavellian point of view, it made sense to allow Russia to fool
    themselves into thinking they can win. Getting them to commit more
    troops to the effort meant that they would be weakened even more
    internationally as those troops and equipment are destroyed. Now that
    part has done its work. Now is the time to ensure they gain nothing
    from the effort and can't withdraw the equipment in good order. It is
    a cold hearted view to be sure but on the international stage sometimes
    that is just the way you need to think.

    AND posted the same to another thread without being shadow banned! Copy
    and paste, so it's not to do with manually entered characters. It's not
    to do with Google employee privileges.

    What is special about that post? Two spaces after sentences? No all caps words, but I've tried that plenty of times. The use of quotation marks? Cannot be proper spelling, because I never make spelling mistakes
    (speech recognition).

    Maybe it's the phrase "Now is the time". I like that phrase... What
    other crazy thing could it be? If it is a phrase, how to figure out what phrase it is?

    Politics? Can they figure out that with an algorithm? It's done too
    quickly and wouldn't be feasible via human censors.

    Seems some of my short posts can be repeated and they always get through (without being shadow banned). Don't see anything special about them
    either.

    Might be some formatting rules. Maybe two spaces after sentences is part
    of whatever it is. I always single space.

    But then, I just copied and pasted another relatively long reply (in a different thread) with only single spacing, and it posted...

    My parents were narcissists and they ruled exactly like pootin. No
    empathy, just what you can use people for, and living (and dying) like
    pigs. It's weird that the narcissist mindset is so universal. And in my
    family many are still in denial, the parents were heroes. It's really
    like a cult, no one will be able to change the russian people's
    brainwashing. And, like in an abusive family, the people don't discuss
    it with each other. It's bizarre. And, like in my family, the people
    cannot see that pootin despises them.

    What is their algorithm...

    Apparently a clue can be had by simply copying and pasting somebody's relatively long reply. So that means it is something in the post, but
    what is it... Those two posts do look somewhat similar in writing style.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From corvid@21:1/5 to John Dope on Wed Jun 15 12:28:32 2022
    On 6/15/22 11:56, John Dope wrote:
    I figured out some more stuff about their algorithm, and it's working
    pretty well.

    I figured out that you are lowering LaMDA's IQ.
    While it isn't ever going to be better than average, filtering out your writings should allow it to approach that level.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to corvid on Thu Jun 16 12:40:43 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    Anybody can push the "ignore thread" key. Almost anybody can
    programmatically ignore threads that are properly labeled "OT".

    This nym-shifting troll knows nothing and cares not about electronics. The
    only reason it's here is for stalking me.

    see also...
    =?UTF-8?Q?C=c3=b6rvid?= <bl_ckbirds.org> =?UTF-8?B?8J+QriBDb3dzIGFyZSBOaWNlIPCfkK4=?= <nice_cows.moo>
    Banders <snap_mailchute.com>
    Covid-19 <always.look_message.header>
    corvid <bl_ckb.ird>
    Corvid <bl_ckbirds.net>
    Corvid <bl_ckbirds.org>
    Cows Are Nice <cows_nice.moo>
    Cows are nice <moo_cows.org>
    Cows are Nice <nice_cows.moo>
    dogs <dogs_home.com>
    Great Pumpkin <pumpkin_patch.net>
    Jose Curvo <jcurvo_mymail.com>
    Local Favorite <how2recycle_palomar.info>
    Sea <freshness_coast.org>
    Standard Poodle <standard_poodle.com>
    triangles <build_home.com>
    and others...

    --
    corvid <bl@ckb.ird> wrote:

    Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!xUOiStaTX9GQDNXPji0+sg.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail
    From: corvid <bl@ckb.ird>
    Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
    Subject: Re: OT: How is YouTube censoring video comment sections?
    Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 12:28:32 -0700
    Organization: The 27 Club
    Message-ID: <t8dbt1$191m$1@gioia.aioe.org>
    References: <t6moq2$95u$2@dont-email.me> <t8da1f$jcd$2@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="42038"; posting-host="xUOiStaTX9GQDNXPji0+sg.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org";
    User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0
    X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
    Content-Language: en-US
    Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:671732

    On 6/15/22 11:56, John Dope wrote:
    I figured out some more stuff about their algorithm, and it's working
    pretty well.

    I figured out that you are lowering LaMDA's IQ.
    While it isn't ever going to be better than average, filtering out your writings should allow it to approach that level.




    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Edward Hernandez@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 16 12:56:04 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    In message-id <t6nt3e$7bp$3@dont-email.me> (http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=165357273000) posted Thu, 26 May 2022
    12:50:54 -0000 (UTC) John Doe stated:

    Always Wrong, the utterly foulmouthed group idiot, adding absolutely
    NOTHING but insults to this thread, as usual...

    Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe's post ratio to
    USENET (**) has been 59.3% of its posts contributing "nothing except
    insults" to USENET.

    ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
    least 1785 articles to USENET. Of which 173 have been pure insults and
    885 have been John Doe "troll format" postings.

    The Troll Doe stated the following in message-id
    <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

    The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

    And the Troll Doe stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

    The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
    breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
    CLUELESS...

    And yet, the clueless Troll Doe has continued to post incorrectly
    formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
    Thu, 16 Jun 2022 12:40:43 -0000 (UTC) in message-id <t8f8cb$n4h$1@dont-email.me>).

    NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.

    This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
    readers who happen by to point out that John Doe does not even follow
    the rules it uses to troll other posters.

    timyQKPB+ICp

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)