• OT: Will a Washington DC jury convict a Democrat?

    From John Doe@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 17 21:34:34 2022
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/sussmann-jury-selected-as-durham- makes-rare-appearance

    Over 90% of Washington DC votes for the Democrat in every presidential election. Can't help but agree with the article...

    "The full jury panel contains 11 women and five men."

    "Many...expressed strong disdain for former President Donald Trump and/or support for Clinton."

    Surprise.

    "one of the selected jurors...said she “strongly” disliked Trump...but
    noted that "if it’s not directly about Trump,” then she could be
    impartial."

    Yeah, right...

    "Another selected juror...said he had donated money to the Democratic side during the 2016 primaries but said he believed he could be fair."

    Yeah, right...

    "An...attorney, said...she “certainly had a strong preference for one
    candidate over the other” [including donating to Hillary's campaign] but
    that she believed she could be impartial."

    Yeah, right...

    "The Department of Justice [was unable to convict] another Democratic
    lawyer in Washington fairly recently in a spin-off case from Mueller’s investigation...in 2019."

    The jury knows the consequence. Looking at up to five years in jail,
    Michael Sussman will start talking. The swamp won't allow it.

    The swamp was a problem with the Mueller investigation. Apparently, when questioned about why half of his team were radical Democrats, Mueller said something like "That's what we had to choose from."

    But of course John Durham knows that. He will keep putting the cards on
    the table.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 17 21:35:27 2022
    oops

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/sussmann-jury-selected-as-durham-makes-rare-appearance

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From whit3rd@21:1/5 to John Doe on Tue May 17 15:18:55 2022
    On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 2:34:41 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/sussmann-jury-selected-as-durham- makes-rare-appearance

    Over 90% of Washington DC votes for the Democrat in every presidential election. Can't help but agree with the article...

    Yeah, you're weak that way. A jury needn't hear evidence on 'being a Democrat',
    and will be instructed to pay attention only to the evidence and charges.

    Jurors are unlikely to be familiar, for instance, with Washington Examiner
    (a weekly that used to be a tabloid), but will know that Republican administrations
    usually want to cut jobs in their town. Votes, not trial results, determine those jobs.

    John Doe doesn't logically connect evidence to charges, and wouldn't be
    a good juror. Selecting folk who ARE good jurors would be the normal procedure.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Edward Hernandez@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 17 23:40:23 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id <svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
    (UTC):

    Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
    except insults to this group.

    Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
    to USENET (**) has been 60.5% of its posts contributing "nothing except insults" to USENET.

    ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
    least 1415 articles to USENET. Of which 149 have been pure insults and
    707 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.

    The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

    The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

    And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

    The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
    breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
    CLUELESS...

    And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
    Tue, 17 May 2022 23:32:35 -0000 (UTC) in message-id <t61baj$anp$1@dont-email.me>).

    NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.

    This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
    readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
    follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

    2maaHDzbYBC0

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to whit3rd@gmail.com on Tue May 17 23:32:35 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    Incoherent babble...

    --
    whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:

    X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:528e:b0:45a:95ff:337f with SMTP id kj14-20020a056214528e00b0045a95ff337fmr22427526qvb.78.1652825935832; Tue, 17 May 2022 15:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Received: by 2002:a25:5457:0:b0:64d:d919:53c2 with SMTP id i84-20020a255457000000b0064dd91953c2mr9350732ybb.358.1652825935461; Tue, 17 May 2022 15:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
    Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-
    groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
    Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
    Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 15:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
    In-Reply-To: <t614d9$3ah$1@dont-email.me>
    Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.221.140.126; posting-account=vKQm_QoAAADOaDCYsqOFDAW8NJ8sFHoE
    NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.221.140.126
    References: <t614d9$3ah$1@dont-email.me>
    User-Agent: G2/1.0
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Message-ID: <49ede294-0aeb-44dc-a014-894e3aaa421bn@googlegroups.com>
    Subject: Re: OT: Will a Washington DC jury convict a Democrat?
    From: whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
    Injection-Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 22:18:55 +0000
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
    X-Received-Bytes: 1972
    Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:669252

    On Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 2:34:41 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/sussmann-jury-selected-as-durham-
    makes-rare-appearance

    Over 90% of Washington DC votes for the Democrat in every presidential
    election. Can't help but agree with the article...

    Yeah, you're weak that way. A jury needn't hear evidence on 'being a Democrat',
    and will be instructed to pay attention only to the evidence and charges.

    Jurors are unlikely to be familiar, for instance, with Washington Examiner
    (a weekly that used to be a tabloid), but will know that Republican administrations
    usually want to cut jobs in their town. Votes, not trial results, determine those jobs.

    John Doe doesn't logically connect evidence to charges, and wouldn't be
    a good juror. Selecting folk who ARE good jurors would be the normal procedure.



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to Edward Hernandez on Wed May 18 11:01:54 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    This porn-sucking retard wants so badly to nym-shift.

    Eddie has never posted anything NORMAL except when it got a spanking...

    https://groups.google.com/g/sci.electronics.repair/c/MesPLcGU4BE

    See also...
    John Doe <always.look@message.header> (Astraweb, Aioe.org)
    Peter Weiner <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
    Edward H. <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
    Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>

    Eddie is an example for all newbies. Don't get spanked!

    Spanked Eddie...

    --
    Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote:

    Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!news-out.netnews.com!news.alt.net!fdc2.netnews.com!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.ams4.
    POSTED!not-for-mail
    From: Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
    Subject: Re: OT: Will a Washington DC jury convict a Democrat?
    Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
    References: <t614d9$3ah$1@dont-email.me> <49ede294-0aeb-44dc-a014-894e3aaa421bn@googlegroups.com> <t61baj$anp$1@dont-email.me>
    Lines: 40
    Message-ID: <HnWgK.1104601$an1.555081@usenetxs.com>
    X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
    NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 23:40:23 UTC
    Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 23:40:23 GMT
    X-Received-Bytes: 2118
    Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:669254 free.spam:18332

    Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id <svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
    (UTC):

    Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
    except insults to this group.

    Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
    to USENET (**) has been 60.5% of its posts contributing "nothing except insults" to USENET.

    ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
    least 1415 articles to USENET. Of which 149 have been pure insults and
    707 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.

    The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

    The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

    And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

    The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
    breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
    CLUELESS...

    And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
    Tue, 17 May 2022 23:32:35 -0000 (UTC) in message-id <t61baj$anp$1@dont-email.me>).

    NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.

    This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
    readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

    2maaHDzbYBC0




    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Edward Hernandez@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 18 11:11:02 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id <svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
    (UTC):

    Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
    except insults to this group.

    Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe's post ratio to
    USENET (**) has been 60.4% of its posts contributing "nothing except
    insults" to USENET.

    ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
    least 1419 articles to USENET. Of which 149 have been pure insults and
    708 have been John Doe "troll format" postings.

    The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

    The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

    And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

    The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
    breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
    CLUELESS...

    And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
    Wed, 18 May 2022 11:01:54 -0000 (UTC) in message-id <t62jn2$8ju$4@dont-email.me>).

    NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.

    This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
    readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
    follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

    aAhl5dwMcC5n

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 21 07:56:49 2022
    https://jnews.uk/durham-probe-prosecutions-problem-isnt-evidence-its-the-district-of-columbia-jury-nunes/

    "the last Republican mayor the District [Washington DC] elected - then
    under its commissioner-system - was Henry BF McFarland in 1900"







    I wrote:

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/sussmann-jury-selected-as-durham- makes-rare-appearance

    Over 90% of Washington DC votes for the Democrat in every presidential election. Can't help but agree with the article...

    "The full jury panel contains 11 women and five men."

    "Many...expressed strong disdain for former President Donald Trump and/or support for Clinton."

    Surprise.

    "one of the selected jurors...said she "strongly" disliked Trump...but
    noted that "if it's not directly about Trump," then she could be
    impartial."

    Yeah, right...

    "Another selected juror...said he had donated money to the Democratic side during the 2016 primaries but said he believed he could be fair."

    Yeah, right...

    "An...attorney, said...she "certainly had a strong preference for one candidate over the other" [including donating to Hillary's campaign] but
    that she believed she could be impartial."

    Yeah, right...

    "The Department of Justice [was unable to convict] another Democratic
    lawyer in Washington fairly recently in a spin-off case from Mueller's investigation...in 2019."

    The jury knows the consequence. Looking at up to five years in jail,
    Michael Sussman will start talking. The swamp won't allow it.

    The swamp was a problem with the Mueller investigation. Apparently, when questioned about why half of his team were radical Democrats, Mueller said something like "That's what we had to choose from."

    But of course John Durham knows that. He will keep putting the cards on
    the table.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 21 11:49:12 2022
    Out of respect for anyone who has little interest in the case and has
    ignored this thread, I post here.

    https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/why-did-sussmanns-attorneys-put-robby-mook-on-the-witness-stand/

    Sussmann's defense is that he wasn't working on behalf of a client for
    that particular meeting with the FBI? He was such a good Samaritan, he delivered the information against the wishes of his boss?

    That wouldn't work since one of John Durham team's court filings includes Sussmann's congressional testimony in which Sussmann plainly admitted
    going to the FBI on behalf of "my client".

    Sussmann's testimony to Congress...

    Q [Kash Patel]: When you decided to engage the two principals, one, [the
    FBI General Counsel] in September, and the general counsel of [Agency-2]
    in December, you were doing that on your own volition, based on
    information another client provided you. Is that correct?

    A [Sussmann]: No.

    Q: So what was -- so did your client direct you to have those
    conversations?

    A: Yes.

    Q: Okay. And your client also was witting/aware of you going to [redacted]
    in February to disclose the information that individual had provided you?

    A: Yes

    Q: Okay. I want to ask you, so you mentioned that your client directed you
    to have these engagements with the FBI and [redacted] and to disseminate
    the information that client provided you. Is that correct?

    A: Well, I apologize for the double negative. It isn't not correct, but
    when you say my client directed me, we had a conversation, as lawyers do
    with their clients, about client needs and objectives and the best course
    to take for a client. And so it may have been a decision that we came to together. I mean, I don't want to imply that I was sort of directed to do something against my better judgment, or that we were in any sort of
    conflict, but this was -- I think it's most accurate to say it was done on behalf of my client.


    SO WHO WAS "MY CLIENT"???

    Probably Rodney Joffe.



    --

    The original thread subject matter...

    I wrote:

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/sussmann-jury-selected-as-durham- makes-rare-appearance

    Over 90% of Washington DC votes for the Democrat in every presidential election. Can't help but agree with the article...

    "The full jury panel contains 11 women and five men."

    "Many...expressed strong disdain for former President Donald Trump and/or support for Clinton."

    Surprise.

    "one of the selected jurors...said she "strongly" disliked Trump...but
    noted that "if it's not directly about Trump," then she could be
    impartial."

    Yeah, right...

    "Another selected juror...said he had donated money to the Democratic side during the 2016 primaries but said he believed he could be fair."

    Yeah, right...

    "An...attorney, said...she "certainly had a strong preference for one candidate over the other" [including donating to Hillary's campaign] but
    that she believed she could be impartial."

    Yeah, right...

    "The Department of Justice [was unable to convict] another Democratic
    lawyer in Washington fairly recently in a spin-off case from Mueller's investigation...in 2019."

    The jury knows the consequence. Looking at up to five years in jail,
    Michael Sussman will start talking. The swamp won't allow it.

    The swamp was a problem with the Mueller investigation. Apparently, when questioned about why half of his team were radical Democrats, Mueller said something like "That's what we had to choose from."

    But of course John Durham knows that. He will keep putting the cards on
    the table.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)