• OT: Google/YouTube censors Judicial Watch!

    From John Doe@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 15 06:59:28 2022
    https://youtu.be/Bv2O9lbLbm0

    I might have jumped the gun before (or JW just didn't admit it), but there
    you have it. Google/YouTube has censored Judicial Watch.

    And once they get a grip on you, watch out!

    Within the last two or three weeks, Google/YouTube began radical
    censorship of video comment sections. I don't know for a fact, but that censorship might have to do with geographical location (maybe a quota
    system). It's the weirdest thing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to John Doe on Sun May 15 00:44:04 2022
    On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 4:59:34 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
    https://youtu.be/Bv2O9lbLbm0

    I might have jumped the gun before (or JW just didn't admit it), but there you have it. Google/YouTube has censored Judicial Watch.

    And about time too.

    And once they get a grip on you, watch out!

    Judicial Watch is pernicious. John Doe is an example of what happens when you take right-wing nonsense like that seriously.
    Idiots like him do need to be protected from that kind of exploitation.

    Within the last two or three weeks, Google/YouTube began radical
    censorship of video comment sections. I don't know for a fact, but that censorship might have to do with geographical location (maybe a quota system). It's the weirdest thing.

    It's weird that it has taken so long. Domestic terrorism is a real risk in the US. Look at the Capitol Building invasion, and imagine what might have happened if somebody more competent than Trump had set it up.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to John Doe on Sun May 15 01:28:40 2022
    On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 6:18:48 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
    Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
    On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 4:59:34 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
    https://youtu.be/Bv2O9lbLbm0

    I might have jumped the gun before (or JW just didn't admit it), but there
    you have it. Google/YouTube has censored Judicial Watch.

    And about time too.

    And once they get a grip on you, watch out!

    Judicial Watch is pernicious. John Doe is an example of what happens when you take right-wing nonsense like that seriously. Idiots like him do need to be protected from that kind of exploitation.

    Within the last two or three weeks, Google/YouTube began radical
    censorship of video comment sections. I don't know for a fact, but that >> censorship might have to do with geographical location (maybe a quota
    system). It's the weirdest thing.

    It's weird that it has taken so long. Domestic terrorism is a real risk in the US. Look at the Capitol Building invasion, and imagine what might have happened if somebody more competent than Trump had set it up.

    This Australian is always sticking its nose into our business.

    John Doe posts right-wing political nonsense on sci.electronics.design, then gets upset when it is pointed out that it is irrelevant nonsense. He's dumping his nonsense in a place where it really doesn't belong, which is evidence of decidedly imperfect
    house-training, but he still gets upset when his nose gets rubbed in it.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Sun May 15 08:18:42 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    This cannibal leftist Australian is always sticking its filthy nose into
    our business.

    Bozo Bill Sloman, the most frequent troll in this group, is an attention- craving chronic liar who cannot be reasoned with.

    "the user has posted under the same name in other places, so not
    nym-shifting" (Bozo sucks at logic)

    "the Mueller investigation was about Trump only because Trump made it so"
    (Bozo being Bozo)

    "the concepts "male" and "female" are essentially social constructions"
    (Bozo is a textbook cannibal leftist)

    --
    Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5bcc:0:b0:45b:115d:b9e5 with SMTP id t12-20020ad45bcc000000b0045b115db9e5mr10929889qvt.77.1652600645416; Sun, 15 May 2022 00:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Received: by 2002:a0d:db41:0:b0:2f5:6dd:ba24 with SMTP id d62-20020a0ddb41000000b002f506ddba24mr14098676ywe.462.1652600645207; Sun, 15 May 2022 00:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
    Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-
    groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
    Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
    Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 00:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
    In-Reply-To: <t5q8cf$a6n$1@dont-email.me>
    Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=118.208.108.19; posting-account=SJ46pgoAAABuUDuHc5uDiXN30ATE-zi-
    NNTP-Posting-Host: 118.208.108.19
    References: <t5q8cf$a6n$1@dont-email.me>
    User-Agent: G2/1.0
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Message-ID: <cadecf55-6493-4699-aa46-71b0615f6265n@googlegroups.com>
    Subject: Re: OT: Google/YouTube censors Judicial Watch!
    From: Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
    Injection-Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 07:44:05 +0000
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
    X-Received-Bytes: 2117
    Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:669045

    On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 4:59:34 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
    https://youtu.be/Bv2O9lbLbm0

    I might have jumped the gun before (or JW just didn't admit it), but there >> you have it. Google/YouTube has censored Judicial Watch.

    And about time too.

    And once they get a grip on you, watch out!

    Judicial Watch is pernicious. John Doe is an example of what happens when you take right-wing nonsense like that seriously.
    Idiots like him do need to be protected from that kind of exploitation.

    Within the last two or three weeks, Google/YouTube began radical
    censorship of video comment sections. I don't know for a fact, but that
    censorship might have to do with geographical location (maybe a quota
    system). It's the weirdest thing.

    It's weird that it has taken so long. Domestic terrorism is a real risk in the US. Look at the Capitol Building invasion, and imagine what might have happened if somebody more competent than Trump had set it up.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Sun May 15 08:40:11 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    This Australian troll needs to get a life...

    --
    Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    X-Received: by 2002:a0c:9c08:0:b0:45a:a2a1:62e4 with SMTP id v8-20020a0c9c08000000b0045aa2a162e4mr10851458qve.114.1652603321033; Sun, 15 May 2022 01:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Received: by 2002:a25:b93:0:b0:64b:ab41:447 with SMTP id 141-20020a250b93000000b0064bab410447mr9505506ybl.349.1652603320824; Sun, 15 May 2022 01:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
    Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-
    groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
    Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
    Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 01:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
    In-Reply-To: <t5qd12$67g$3@dont-email.me>
    Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=118.208.108.19; posting-account=SJ46pgoAAABuUDuHc5uDiXN30ATE-zi-
    NNTP-Posting-Host: 118.208.108.19
    References: <t5q8cf$a6n$1@dont-email.me> <cadecf55-6493-4699-aa46-71b0615f6265n@googlegroups.com> <t5qd12$67g$3@dont-email.me>
    User-Agent: G2/1.0
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Message-ID: <300571e3-f0b2-4caf-abc4-b70c9a296840n@googlegroups.com>
    Subject: Re: OT: Google/YouTube censors Judicial Watch!
    From: Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
    Injection-Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 08:28:41 +0000
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    X-Received-Bytes: 2909
    Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:669051

    On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 6:18:48 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
    Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
    On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 4:59:34 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
    https://youtu.be/Bv2O9lbLbm0

    I might have jumped the gun before (or JW just didn't admit it), but t
    here
    you have it. Google/YouTube has censored Judicial Watch.

    And about time too.

    And once they get a grip on you, watch out!

    Judicial Watch is pernicious. John Doe is an example of what happens wh
    en you take right-wing nonsense like that seriously. Idiots like him do need to be protected from that kind of exploitation.

    Within the last two or three weeks, Google/YouTube began radical
    censorship of video comment sections. I don't know for a fact, but tha
    t
    censorship might have to do with geographical location (maybe a quota

    system). It's the weirdest thing.

    It's weird that it has taken so long. Domestic terrorism is a real risk
    in the US. Look at the Capitol Building invasion, and imagine what might have happened if somebody more competent than Trump had set it up.

    This Australian is always sticking its nose into our business.

    John Doe posts right-wing political nonsense on sci.electronics.design, then gets upset when it is pointed out that it is irrelevant nonsense. He's dumping his nonsense in a place where it really doesn't belong, which is evidence of decidedly
    imperfect house-training, but he still gets upset when his nose gets rubbed in it.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Edward Hernandez@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 15 09:00:21 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

    The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

    And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

    The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
    breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
    CLUELESS...

    And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
    incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Sun, 15 May 2022 08:18:42 -0000
    (UTC) in message-id <t5qd12$67g$3@dont-email.me>.

    Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id <svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
    (UTC):

    Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
    except insults to this group.

    Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
    to USENET (**) has been 60.5% of its posts contributing "nothing except insults" to USENET.

    ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
    least 1376 articles to USENET. Of which 149 have been pure insults and
    684 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.

    iD95b1oB78vY

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From whit3rd@21:1/5 to John Doe on Sun May 15 12:18:17 2022
    On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 11:59:34 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
    https://youtu.be/Bv2O9lbLbm0

    I might have jumped the gun before (or JW just didn't admit it), but there you have it. Google/YouTube has censored Judicial Watch.

    And once they get a grip on you, watch out!

    What 'censor' means, is that a government agent (judge) has commanded ... Judicial Watch is a nonprofit (they don't pay taxes) that does file-cases-for-cash
    service in the interests of many clients with political reasons to want a
    court decision on a subject. The clients, not the JW organization, decide the claim-of-the-day.

    So, Google/YouTube is well within their rights as publisher to reject
    a publication from that group, if it looks like disinformation.
    Half-truths is disinformation, it's a judgment call when to publish;
    YouTube has made one such call.

    YouTube isn't a censor; their publication decisions have no law-enforcement backup. That means you don't need to "watch out".

    Judicial Watch (the organization) serves a variety of purposes,
    as varied as their clientele, and some are valuable; YouTube still allows
    them, just didn't host one particular offering from that source. The tempest-in-a-teapot has been an amusement, not a threat.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Edward Hernandez@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 16 04:52:36 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

    The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

    And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

    The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
    breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
    CLUELESS...

    And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
    Mon, 16 May 2022 04:44:49 -0000 (UTC) in message-id <t5sks0$ng$6@dont-email.me>).

    NOBODY likes the John Doe troll's contentless spam.

    Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id <svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
    (UTC):

    Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
    except insults to this group.

    Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe's post ratio to
    USENET (**) has been 60.6% of its posts contributing "nothing except
    insults" to USENET.

    ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
    least 1381 articles to USENET. Of which 149 have been pure insults and
    688 have been John Doe "troll format" postings.

    This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
    readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
    follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.

    GdJ8tEMi5WLf

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to John Doe on Sun May 15 22:11:49 2022
    Edward Hernandez <dtga...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 2:44:55 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
    Eddie wants so badly to nym-shift. That's a no-no here, Eddie!

    Eddie has never posted anything NORMAL except when it got a spanking...

    John Doe has this pathetic delusion that it can deliver a "spanking". All it can do is publish the fact that it objects to having it's nasty habits reviled.

    Its enthusiasm for clogging up vast volumes of usernet space with its pathetic squawlling is irritating.

    Edward Hernandez isn't much better - his rebukes don't seem to change John Doe antisocial behavior at all, and are almost as much of a waste of bandwidth as John Doe inappropriate twaddle. I've been rude to John Doe often enough for it to have gotten to
    be almost as tedious and predictable.

    I haven't complained about this specific John Doe delusion before but it's been irritating me for quite a while now.

    Since John Doe is a practitioner of multi-faceted obnoxiousness, I'll probably find something new to tip me over the edge sometime soon.

    Not responding creeps like him is probably the best policy, but if he didn't get some negative feedback he might think that he was being tolerated rather than endured.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Mon May 16 05:21:13 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    This Bozo is a textbook cannibal leftist.
    It is chronic liar that cannot be reasoned with,
    it supports everything destructive...

    --
    Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:5008:b0:45b:82:6ef with SMTP id jo8-20020a056214500800b0045b008206efmr14008123qvb.87.1652677909674; Sun, 15 May 2022 22:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Received: by 2002:a81:980c:0:b0:2f8:be8d:5100 with SMTP id p12-20020a81980c000000b002f8be8d5100mr17899122ywg.52.1652677909410; Sun, 15 May 2022 22:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
    Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-
    groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
    Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
    Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 22:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
    In-Reply-To: <t5sks0$ng$6@dont-email.me>
    Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=118.208.108.19; posting-account=SJ46pgoAAABuUDuHc5uDiXN30ATE-zi-
    NNTP-Posting-Host: 118.208.108.19
    References: <t5q8cf$a6n$1@dont-email.me> <cadecf55-6493-4699-aa46-71b0615f6265n@googlegroups.com> <t5qd12$67g$3@dont-email.me> <300571e3-f0b2-4caf-abc4-b70c9a296840n@googlegroups.com> <t5qe9a$err$2@dont-email.me> <Ii3gK.2086573$Z91.424579@usenetxs.com>
    <t5sks0$ng$6@dont-email.me>
    User-Agent: G2/1.0
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Message-ID: <32087322-cf77-402e-a909-3d7b046071bdn@googlegroups.com>
    Subject: Re: OT: Google/YouTube censors Judicial Watch!
    From: Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
    Injection-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 05:11:49 +0000
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    X-Received-Bytes: 2717
    Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:669098


    Edward Hernandez <dtga...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 2:44:55 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
    Eddie wants so badly to nym-shift. That's a no-no here, Eddie!

    Eddie has never posted anything NORMAL except when it got a spanking...


    John Doe has this pathetic delusion that it can deliver a "spanking". All it can do is publish the fact that it objects to having it's nasty habits reviled.

    Its enthusiasm for clogging up vast volumes of usernet space with its pathetic squawlling is irritating.

    Edward Hernandez isn't much better - his rebukes don't seem to change John Doe antisocial behavior at all, and are almost as much of a waste of bandwidth as John Doe inappropriate twaddle. I've been rude to John Doe often enough for it to have gotten
    to be almost as tedious and predictable.

    I haven't complained about this specific John Doe delusion before but it's been irritating me for quite a while now.

    Since John Doe is a practitioner of multi-faceted obnoxiousness, I'll probably find something new to tip me over the edge sometime soon.

    Not responding creeps like him is probably the best policy, but if he didn't get some negative feedback he might think that he was being tolerated rather than endured.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to whit3rd@gmail.com on Mon May 16 05:16:47 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    Judicial watch is supported by donations, so what?

    The idea Judicial Watch staff does not promote their own views is
    ignorant. Apparently the poster hasn't watched any JW videos...

    https://youtu.be/1HH_Gikr9RY?t=570 (at least ten minutes)

    Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton clearly expresses his opposition to
    "the culture of death that Roe V Wade gave us".

    Judicial Watch brings many freedom of information act (FOIA) cases against
    our government. What other organization forces our government to cough up information anywhere near as much?

    Cannibal leftist organizations have every right to force government to
    cough up information, but they don't, because the cannibal left supports
    the Deep State. The Deep State is "the invisible and mischievous power
    which thwarts [elected officials'] most noble views" and remains hidden
    for good reason. Judicial Watch's concern about the Deep State and their zealous promotion of FOIA lawsuits goes hand in hand.

    This poster has a strange definition of "censorship" everybody else must understand!

    --
    whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:

    X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:588:b0:2f3:bca9:ea34 with SMTP id c8-20020a05622a058800b002f3bca9ea34mr13078179qtb.601.1652642297678; Sun, 15 May 2022 12:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Received: by 2002:a25:44c1:0:b0:64a:94d7:6a5a with SMTP id r184-20020a2544c1000000b0064a94d76a5amr14799336yba.396.1652642297470; Sun, 15 May 2022 12:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
    Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-
    groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
    Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
    Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 12:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
    In-Reply-To: <t5q8cf$a6n$1@dont-email.me>
    Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.221.140.126; posting-account=vKQm_QoAAADOaDCYsqOFDAW8NJ8sFHoE
    NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.221.140.126
    References: <t5q8cf$a6n$1@dont-email.me>
    User-Agent: G2/1.0
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Message-ID: <fe96479e-8f1b-4b7c-b0a4-51c4efa37136n@googlegroups.com>
    Subject: Re: OT: Google/YouTube censors Judicial Watch!
    From: whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
    Injection-Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 19:18:17 +0000
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
    X-Received-Bytes: 2368
    Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:669081

    On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 11:59:34 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
    https://youtu.be/Bv2O9lbLbm0

    I might have jumped the gun before (or JW just didn't admit it), but there >> you have it. Google/YouTube has censored Judicial Watch.

    And once they get a grip on you, watch out!

    What 'censor' means, is that a government agent (judge) has commanded ... Judicial Watch is a nonprofit (they don't pay taxes) that does file-cases-for-cash
    service in the interests of many clients with political reasons to want a court decision on a subject. The clients, not the JW organization, decide the claim-of-the-day.

    So, Google/YouTube is well within their rights as publisher to reject
    a publication from that group, if it looks like disinformation.
    Half-truths is disinformation, it's a judgment call when to publish;
    YouTube has made one such call.

    YouTube isn't a censor; their publication decisions have no law-enforcement backup. That means you don't need to "watch out".

    Judicial Watch (the organization) serves a variety of purposes,
    as varied as their clientele, and some are valuable; YouTube still allows them, just didn't host one particular offering from that source. The tempest-in-a-teapot has been an amusement, not a threat.



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Edward Hernandez@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 16 05:31:17 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

    The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

    And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

    The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
    breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
    CLUELESS...

    And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
    incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Mon, 16 May 2022 05:16:47 -0000
    (UTC) in message-id <t5smnu$cv1$1@dont-email.me>.

    Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id <svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
    (UTC):

    Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
    except insults to this group.

    Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe's post ratio to
    USENET (**) has been 60.7% of its posts contributing "nothing except
    insults" to USENET.

    ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
    least 1384 articles to USENET. Of which 149 have been pure insults and
    691 have been John Doe "troll format" postings.

    OEbhhdn/oXVC

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to John Doe on Sun May 15 23:01:08 2022
    On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 3:16:54 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
    whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 11:59:34 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:

    <snip>

    What 'censor' means, is that a government agent (judge) has commanded ... Judicial Watch is a nonprofit (they don't pay taxes) that does file-cases-for-cash
    service in the interests of many clients with political reasons to want a court decision on a subject. The clients, not the JW organization, decide the claim-of-the-day.

    So, Google/YouTube is well within their rights as publisher to reject
    a publication from that group, if it looks like disinformation.
    Half-truths is disinformation, it's a judgment call when to publish; YouTube has made one such call.

    YouTube isn't a censor; their publication decisions have no law-enforcement backup. That means you don't need to "watch out".

    Judicial Watch (the organization) serves a variety of purposes,
    as varied as their clientele, and some are valuable; YouTube still allows them, just didn't host one particular offering from that source. The tempest-in-a-teapot has been an amusement, not a threat.

    Judicial watch is supported by donations, so what?

    So was the Tea Party Faction, to such an extent that it did exactly what the Koch brothers wanted. The wrecked the Republican Party, and left it easy meat for Donald Trump, which probably wasn't what the Koch brother had in mind.

    The idea Judicial Watch staff does not promote their own views is
    ignorant. Apparently the poster hasn't watched any JW videos...

    https://youtu.be/1HH_Gikr9RY?t=570 (at least ten minutes)

    Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton clearly expresses his opposition to
    "the culture of death that Roe V Wade gave us".

    So he's trying to suck in money from the religious right. Roe versus Wade meant more safe legal abortion and fewer dangerous illegal abortions.
    Perhaps more dead fetuses, but definitely fewer dead mothers.

    Judicial Watch brings many freedom of information act (FOIA) cases against our government. What other organization forces our government to cough up information anywhere near as much?

    Judicial Watch may bring many cases, but most of them seem to fail.

    Cannibal leftist organizations have every right to force government to
    cough up information, but they don't, because the cannibal left supports
    the Deep State. The Deep State is "the invisible and mischievous power
    which thwarts [elected officials'] most noble views" and remains hidden
    for good reason. Judicial Watch's concern about the Deep State and their zealous promotion of FOIA lawsuits goes hand in hand.

    Lunatic delusions about the existence of Deep State do seem provoke a lot of pointless activity.
    John Doe doesn't boast about any particular case. most likely because there aren't any worth boasting about.

    This poster has a strange definition of "censorship" everybody else must understand!

    As does John Doe. John Doe is an idiot. Whit3rd isn't, and he does seem to be using a generally accepted definition of censorship.

    A censor is a government employee - a member of the real - visible - state, as opposed to the imaginary Deep State. YouTube isn't a state organisation.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to Anthony William Sloman on Mon May 16 06:07:23 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    No point in arguing with Bozo the Australian troll. Bozo is a chronic liar. When you refute its lies, it simply creates more lies to cover its prior
    lies. Its fiction never ends.

    Bozo Bill Sloman, the most frequent troll in this group cannot be reasoned with.

    "the user has posted under the same name in other places, so not
    nym-shifting" (Bozo sucks at logic)

    "the Mueller investigation was about Trump only because Trump made it so"
    (Bozo being Bozo)

    "the concepts "male" and "female" are essentially social constructions"
    (Bozo is a textbook cannibal leftist)

    --
    Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

    X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5fd4:0:b0:2f3:f0d7:757a with SMTP id k20-20020ac85fd4000000b002f3f0d7757amr13777067qta.557.1652680869387; Sun, 15 May 2022 23:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Received: by 2002:a25:c342:0:b0:64b:2f51:b519 with SMTP id t63-20020a25c342000000b0064b2f51b519mr15844491ybf.424.1652680869148; Sun, 15 May 2022 23:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
    Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feed1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-
    groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
    Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
    Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 23:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
    In-Reply-To: <t5smnu$cv1$1@dont-email.me>
    Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=118.208.108.19; posting-account=SJ46pgoAAABuUDuHc5uDiXN30ATE-zi-
    NNTP-Posting-Host: 118.208.108.19
    References: <t5q8cf$a6n$1@dont-email.me> <fe96479e-8f1b-4b7c-b0a4-51c4efa37136n@googlegroups.com> <t5smnu$cv1$1@dont-email.me>
    User-Agent: G2/1.0
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Message-ID: <bff4ff8d-3a9f-4453-9fa6-788a81880965n@googlegroups.com>
    Subject: Re: OT: Google/YouTube censors Judicial Watch!
    From: Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
    Injection-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 06:01:09 +0000
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
    X-Received-Bytes: 4606
    Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:669107

    On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 3:16:54 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
    whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 11:59:34 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:

    <snip>

    What 'censor' means, is that a government agent (judge) has commanded ... >> > Judicial Watch is a nonprofit (they don't pay taxes) that does file-cases-for-cash
    service in the interests of many clients with political reasons to want a >> > court decision on a subject. The clients, not the JW organization, decide >> > the claim-of-the-day.

    So, Google/YouTube is well within their rights as publisher to reject
    a publication from that group, if it looks like disinformation.
    Half-truths is disinformation, it's a judgment call when to publish;
    YouTube has made one such call.

    YouTube isn't a censor; their publication decisions have no law-enforcement
    backup. That means you don't need to "watch out".

    Judicial Watch (the organization) serves a variety of purposes,
    as varied as their clientele, and some are valuable; YouTube still allows >> > them, just didn't host one particular offering from that source. The
    tempest-in-a-teapot has been an amusement, not a threat.

    Judicial watch is supported by donations, so what?

    So was the Tea Party Faction, to such an extent that it did exactly what the Koch brothers wanted. The wrecked the Republican Party, and left it easy meat for Donald Trump, which probably wasn't what the Koch brother had in mind.

    The idea Judicial Watch staff does not promote their own views is
    ignorant. Apparently the poster hasn't watched any JW videos...

    https://youtu.be/1HH_Gikr9RY?t=570 (at least ten minutes)

    Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton clearly expresses his opposition to
    "the culture of death that Roe V Wade gave us".

    So he's trying to suck in money from the religious right. Roe versus Wade meant more safe legal abortion and fewer dangerous illegal abortions.
    Perhaps more dead fetuses, but definitely fewer dead mothers.

    Judicial Watch brings many freedom of information act (FOIA) cases against >> our government. What other organization forces our government to cough up
    information anywhere near as much?

    Judicial Watch may bring many cases, but most of them seem to fail.

    Cannibal leftist organizations have every right to force government to
    cough up information, but they don't, because the cannibal left supports
    the Deep State. The Deep State is "the invisible and mischievous power
    which thwarts [elected officials'] most noble views" and remains hidden
    for good reason. Judicial Watch's concern about the Deep State and their
    zealous promotion of FOIA lawsuits goes hand in hand.

    Lunatic delusions about the existence of Deep State do seem provoke a lot of pointless activity.
    John Doe doesn't boast about any particular case. most likely because there aren't any worth boasting about.

    This poster has a strange definition of "censorship" everybody else must understand!

    As does John Doe. John Doe is an idiot. Whit3rd isn't, and he does seem to be using a generally accepted definition of censorship.

    A censor is a government employee - a member of the real - visible - state, as opposed to the imaginary Deep State. YouTube isn't a state organisation.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney




    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Edward Hernandez@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 16 06:10:05 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

    The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

    And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

    The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
    breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
    CLUELESS...

    And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
    incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Mon, 16 May 2022 06:03:03 -0000
    (UTC) in message-id <t5spen$phn$3@dont-email.me>.

    Further, John Doe stated the following in message-id <svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
    (UTC):

    Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
    except insults to this group.

    Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe's post ratio to
    USENET (**) has been 60.8% of its posts contributing "nothing except
    insults" to USENET.

    ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) John Doe has posted at
    least 1388 articles to USENET. Of which 149 have been pure insults and
    695 have been John Doe "troll format" postings.

    HX+uUQ3P+Y57

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Edward Hernandez@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 16 06:13:24 2022
    XPost: free.spam

    The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:

    The troll doesn't even know how to format a USENET post...

    And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id <sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:

    The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
    breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
    CLUELESS...

    And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
    incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Mon, 16 May 2022 06:11:53 -0000
    (UTC) in message-id <t5spv9$to1$2@dont-email.me>.

    Further, Troll Doe stated the following in message-id <svsh05$lbh$5@dont-email.me> posted Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:01:09 -0000
    (UTC):

    Compared to other regulars, Bozo contributes practically nothing
    except insults to this group.

    Yet, since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe's post ratio
    to USENET (**) has been 60.9% of its posts contributing "nothing except insults" to USENET.

    ** Since Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:10:38 -0000 (UTC) Troll Doe has posted at
    least 1390 articles to USENET. Of which 149 have been pure insults and
    697 have been Troll Doe "troll format" postings.

    JHJMK7fKu8Kf

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From whit3rd@21:1/5 to John Doe on Mon May 16 03:04:26 2022
    On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 10:16:54 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
    Judicial watch is supported by donations, so what?

    The idea Judicial Watch staff does not promote their own views is
    ignorant. Apparently the poster hasn't watched any JW videos...

    Why would I want to watch an infomercial? The staged YouTube
    performances of advocates psyching themselves for an adversarial proceeding may be
    dramatic, because it IS drama, an actor's milieu. The client writes the claim to be presented
    to the court,.
    The JW team doesn't have to believe their lines to read them effectively.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to John Doe on Mon May 16 05:48:58 2022
    On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 4:07:29 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
    Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:

    On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 3:16:54 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
    whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Saturday, May 14, 2022 at 11:59:34 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:

    <snip>

    What 'censor' means, is that a government agent (judge) has commanded ...
    Judicial Watch is a nonprofit (they don't pay taxes) that does file-cases-for-cash
    service in the interests of many clients with political reasons to want a
    court decision on a subject. The clients, not the JW organization, decide
    the claim-of-the-day.

    So, Google/YouTube is well within their rights as publisher to reject
    a publication from that group, if it looks like disinformation.
    Half-truths is disinformation, it's a judgment call when to publish;
    YouTube has made one such call.

    YouTube isn't a censor; their publication decisions have no law-enforcement
    backup. That means you don't need to "watch out".

    Judicial Watch (the organization) serves a variety of purposes,
    as varied as their clientele, and some are valuable; YouTube still allows
    them, just didn't host one particular offering from that source. The
    tempest-in-a-teapot has been an amusement, not a threat.

    Judicial watch is supported by donations, so what?

    So was the Tea Party Faction, to such an extent that it did exactly what the Koch brothers wanted. The wrecked the Republican Party, and left it easy meat for Donald Trump, which probably wasn't what the Koch brother had in mind.

    The idea Judicial Watch staff does not promote their own views is
    ignorant. Apparently the poster hasn't watched any JW videos...

    https://youtu.be/1HH_Gikr9RY?t=570 (at least ten minutes)

    Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton clearly expresses his opposition to
    "the culture of death that Roe V Wade gave us".

    So he's trying to suck in money from the religious right. Roe versus Wade meant more safe legal abortion and fewer dangerous illegal abortions.
    Perhaps more dead fetuses, but definitely fewer dead mothers.

    Judicial Watch brings many freedom of information act (FOIA) cases against >> our government. What other organization forces our government to cough up >> information anywhere near as much?

    Judicial Watch may bring many cases, but most of them seem to fail.

    Cannibal leftist organizations have every right to force government to
    cough up information, but they don't, because the cannibal left supports >> the Deep State. The Deep State is "the invisible and mischievous power
    which thwarts [elected officials'] most noble views" and remains hidden
    for good reason. Judicial Watch's concern about the Deep State and their >> zealous promotion of FOIA lawsuits goes hand in hand.

    Lunatic delusions about the existence of Deep State do seem provoke a lot of pointless activity.
    John Doe doesn't boast about any particular case. most likely because there aren't any worth boasting about.

    This poster has a strange definition of "censorship" everybody else must understand!

    As does John Doe. John Doe is an idiot. Whit3rd isn't, and he does seem to be using a generally accepted definition of censorship.

    A censor is a government employee - a member of the real - visible - state, as opposed to the imaginary Deep State. YouTube isn't a state organisation.

    No point in arguing with Bill the Australian troll.

    John Doe is an idiot, but he's not silly to think that is worth his while to bother putting up any kind of actual argument.
    He's happy to settle for recycled lunatic assertions. They aren't going to convince anybody sane, but that isn't John Doe's target audience.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ricky@21:1/5 to John Doe on Mon May 16 12:10:58 2022
    On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 2:59:34 AM UTC-4, John Doe wrote:
    https://youtu.be/Bv2O9lbLbm0

    I might have jumped the gun before (or JW just didn't admit it), but there you have it. Google/YouTube has censored Judicial Watch.

    And once they get a grip on you, watch out!

    Within the last two or three weeks, Google/YouTube began radical
    censorship of video comment sections. I don't know for a fact, but that censorship might have to do with geographical location (maybe a quota system). It's the weirdest thing.

    Did you listen to the video on Rumble? What did they say that resulted in the censorship? I tried to listen to it, but my liberal ears couldn't stand the burning. I heard a lot of "tend to suggest" and "that would point in that direction" as well as "
    I don't know". I didn't hear anything remotely like evidence of any sort. Lots of mentions of "the laptop" and Hunter Biden being indited, but still nothing of content. So, needless to say, I didn't hear anything that was worthy of censorship. If I
    am so completely bored later tonight, maybe I'll listen to the remaining 11 minutes. It's just such a chore to listen to people talking when they have nothing to say.

    --

    Rick C.

    - Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
    - Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ricky@21:1/5 to Ricky on Mon May 16 15:18:25 2022
    On Monday, May 16, 2022 at 3:11:02 PM UTC-4, Ricky wrote:
    On Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 2:59:34 AM UTC-4, John Doe wrote:
    https://youtu.be/Bv2O9lbLbm0

    I might have jumped the gun before (or JW just didn't admit it), but there you have it. Google/YouTube has censored Judicial Watch.

    And once they get a grip on you, watch out!

    Within the last two or three weeks, Google/YouTube began radical censorship of video comment sections. I don't know for a fact, but that censorship might have to do with geographical location (maybe a quota system). It's the weirdest thing.
    Did you listen to the video on Rumble? What did they say that resulted in the censorship? I tried to listen to it, but my liberal ears couldn't stand the burning. I heard a lot of "tend to suggest" and "that would point in that direction" as well as "I
    don't know". I didn't hear anything remotely like evidence of any sort. Lots of mentions of "the laptop" and Hunter Biden being indited, but still nothing of content. So, needless to say, I didn't hear anything that was worthy of censorship. If I am so
    completely bored later tonight, maybe I'll listen to the remaining 11 minutes. It's just such a chore to listen to people talking when they have nothing to say.

    Oh, dear God! I tried listening to more of it and got to the word "cabal"... I'm sorry, but I can't take the mental abuse of thinking this is a serious discussion and that it's not a Monty Python skit.

    I especially love that more than anything else, they talk about an idea there is no evidence to support, then ask "why isn't this being investigated?" How fucking stupid can people be to listen to this stuff?

    --

    Rick C.

    + Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
    + Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jan Panteltje@21:1/5 to always.look@message.header on Tue May 17 09:20:14 2022
    On a sunny day (Sun, 15 May 2022 06:59:28 -0000 (UTC)) it happened John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in <t5q8cf$a6n$1@dont-email.me>:

    https://youtu.be/Bv2O9lbLbm0

    I might have jumped the gun before (or JW just didn't admit it), but there >you have it. Google/YouTube has censored Judicial Watch.

    And once they get a grip on you, watch out!

    Within the last two or three weeks, Google/YouTube began radical
    censorship of video comment sections. I don't know for a fact, but that >censorship might have to do with geographical location (maybe a quota >system). It's the weirdest thing.

    Yes internet is no longer a free world.
    Apart from the irritating posters who want to police things in a unmoderated group
    here, many areas of the world are blocked by the Evil Forces Of US Opinion Manipulation or in short Marsupilami oh no that was an other animal.

    We have largely moved to postal pigeons and TB micro-SDcards via drones as you are well aware of.
    Even snail mail with micro-SDcards is cheaper and faster for a few TB data.

    Before it all becomes like the what was it .. Matrix...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)