• Re: Corona Update 25, Insurance Fraud, Killing the old and sick to safe

    From Tabby@21:1/5 to Skybuck Flying on Sat May 7 14:05:01 2022
    On Friday, 6 May 2022 at 12:28:24 UTC+1, Skybuck Flying wrote:
    Corona Update 25, 6 may 2022, Insurance Fraud, Killing the old and sick to safe money:

    The "Unsinkable" Titanic sinking may also have been an insurance fraud and bigger conspiracy again

    White star pulled pretty much the identical move years earlier with a previous ship. I forget the name & date.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anthony William Sloman@21:1/5 to Tabby on Sat May 7 20:16:23 2022
    On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 7:05:04 AM UTC+10, Tabby wrote:
    On Friday, 6 May 2022 at 12:28:24 UTC+1, Skybuck Flying wrote:
    Corona Update 25, 6 may 2022, Insurance Fraud, Killing the old and sick to safe money:

    The "Unsinkable" Titanic sinking may also have been an insurance fraud and bigger conspiracy again
    White star pulled pretty much the identical move years earlier with a previous ship. I forget the name & date.

    https://blog.pia.org/2021/04/15/did-the-owners-of-the-rms-titanic-commit-insurance-fraud/

    It seems that Tabby has seen the idiot conspiracy theory and remembered it incorrectly.

    --
    Bill Sloman, Sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skybuck Flying@21:1/5 to bill....@ieee.org on Mon May 9 04:11:46 2022
    On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 5:16:27 AM UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
    On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 7:05:04 AM UTC+10, Tabby wrote:
    On Friday, 6 May 2022 at 12:28:24 UTC+1, Skybuck Flying wrote:
    Corona Update 25, 6 may 2022, Insurance Fraud, Killing the old and sick to safe money:

    The "Unsinkable" Titanic sinking may also have been an insurance fraud and bigger conspiracy again
    White star pulled pretty much the identical move years earlier with a previous ship. I forget the name & date.
    https://blog.pia.org/2021/04/15/did-the-owners-of-the-rms-titanic-commit-insurance-fraud/

    How hard is it to re-place a propeller ?

    As a matter of fact, Olympic's propeller was damaged and had to be replaced anyway.

    So most likely they just replace it with Titanic's propeller with that number on it.

    HAHA ! You going to let one little number make the difference in this fraud case ?

    If that is all they got then it's flitter thin and I just proved to you how they could have swapped it.

    Bye,
    Skybuck.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skybuck Flying@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 9 04:31:28 2022
    Another possibility is that on the day of the sinking of the "titanic", since the ship would be lost anyway, they decided to remove the "good" propeller and replace it with a bad,broken propeller and save some money on the other ship if it ever needed a
    new propeller.

    Thus the broken propeller on the images, bottom of the ocean floor, could simply be a broken one from earlier incidents.

    Bye,
    Skybuck.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skybuck Flying@21:1/5 to bill....@ieee.org on Mon May 9 04:23:23 2022
    On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 5:16:27 AM UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
    On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 7:05:04 AM UTC+10, Tabby wrote:
    On Friday, 6 May 2022 at 12:28:24 UTC+1, Skybuck Flying wrote:
    Corona Update 25, 6 may 2022, Insurance Fraud, Killing the old and sick to safe money:

    The "Unsinkable" Titanic sinking may also have been an insurance fraud and bigger conspiracy again
    White star pulled pretty much the identical move years earlier with a previous ship. I forget the name & date.
    https://blog.pia.org/2021/04/15/did-the-owners-of-the-rms-titanic-commit-insurance-fraud/

    This is the smoking gun:

    https://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/community/threads/vibration-caused-by-lost-propeller-blade.36788/

    Many witnesses of accident mentioned that they felt like a propeller broke off.

    Most likely because titanic was olympic refitted. Olympic was damaged beyond comfort zone...

    Most likely olympics back was bent and twisted to much for the propellers to function properly, that is without vibration.

    Most likely olympic had troubles keeping the propellers on. The bent metal steel back frame so is my hypothesis caused some kind if vibration finally shacking off the propeller.

    Now evidence has emerged that the wreckage of "titanic" is indeed missing a propeller.

    Thus this could explain why the "titanic" made a strange manouver and starting to rotate, one of the propellers broke off.

    How the story proceeds from there is uncertain, possibly sunk on purpose by a war ship.

    This ship was a commercial failure because it got banged harder then USA's most populair porn star haha.

    So many ships banged it... it was simply uncomfortable to sail on... so it had to go down... deep into the ocean.

    Pretty clear picture emerging from a simple google.

    Bye,
    Skybuck.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skybuck Flying@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 9 04:47:04 2022
    Further more no photographs exists of the Titanic's propeller blades.

    Were they conveniently destroyed/removed from history in case ever the Olympic wreckage was found ?!

    Sure seems like it !

    (Be ware there are some pictures on the web apperently claiming that it was the titanic that was photographed but that is not the case, Details Details Details !)

    Bye,
    Skybuck.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skybuck Flying@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 9 04:45:04 2022
    Finally took me a while to get it, but this conspiracy of titanic could be very real, look here and then I will explained below:

    https://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/mystery-titanic-central-propeller.html

    Olympic has 3 propellers, the left and right propeller had 3 blades, the central propeller had 4 blades.

    So olympic looks like:

    3 4 3

    Titanic is rumored to have 3 3 3 propellers.

    That is what the website above is trying to explain.

    By examining a document which mentions 3.

    So if this wreck has a central propeller with 4 blades, then this could prove that the sunken wreckage is that of the olympic and not the titanic !

    Most interesting !

    Bye,
    Skybuck.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skybuck Flying@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 9 05:01:12 2022
    Well at least according to this website and the documents it shows which is also confirmed but other news sources more or less, at least the breaking off of the wings, it seems that replacing the propellers, including the main one/central one, was done
    frequently to test out different configurations for comfort/vibration and speed reasons:

    https://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/mystery-titanic-central-propeller.html

    So this adds huge credibility to my hypothesis that these propellers were simply switched at will, to do, please or look like whatever they wished.

    There is also plenty of talk of "refit" for whatever purposes.

    Bye for now,
    Skybuck.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skybuck Flying@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 9 05:19:27 2022
    Another interesting website:

    https://www.markchirnside.co.uk/TitanicThreeBladedCentrePropeller.html

    The most interesting part is at the bottom. There is lots of confusion about pictures and propellers, so much so, that even to this day people are confused which is which, which perfectly fits the switcheroo narrative, lots of confusion and doubt is in
    the favor of the fraudsters.

    Which even more interesting is that new evidence in the form of a notebook shows that the original titanic was outfitted with a 3-blade central propeller and that James Cameron movie got it wrong hehe. I didn't even watch the movie because it had a
    strange feel to it. Why would you 'romantice' the killing of 1500 people/a disassters, it only makes sense if it is some brain wash operation to distract from the thruth/fraud... so Hollywood was hired once again, to make people's minds drift away from
    fraud and towards a love story.

    A very sick thing, a very sick movie. But fun to see he got it wrong haha. I'll take the website's word for it. But if you want James Cameron to make a nice love story about your death, perhaps a corona or vaccine death, he's your man ! ;) =D LOL

    Bye,
    Skybuck.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skybuck Flying@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 9 05:56:22 2022
    My final conclusion is that this "titanic" wrackege (in light of the "titanic vs olympic" switcheroo conspiracy) is very exciting, because of this website/link and propeller re-fitting/log document:

    https://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/mystery-titanic-central-propeller.html

    It mentioned that the olympic had a 4 blade central propeller design at the time of the sinking of the titanic, 15 april 1912 (according to news stories).
    It mentioned that the titanic had a 3 blade central propeller design at the time of the sinking of the titanic, 15 april 1912 (according to news stories).

    This according to a "propeller refit log" document.

    Now the current situation as far as I know is that the main central propeller is covered in mud/stuck into the ocean floor (of the sunk "titanic" or whatever it is)

    If it is lifted from the mud and it turns out to be a 4-blade propeller than that proves that a switcheroo was done. Just like NVIDIA does "bait and switch" lol which is known among gamers.

    So if the wrackage of titanic is lifted or at least the central propeller is lifted and it's a 4-blade design then whole shit !: FRAUD ! =D HAHAHAHA.

    Bye for now,
    Skybuck.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tabby@21:1/5 to Skybuck Flying on Wed May 11 15:26:54 2022
    On Monday, 9 May 2022 at 12:11:51 UTC+1, Skybuck Flying wrote:
    On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 5:16:27 AM UTC+2, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
    On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 7:05:04 AM UTC+10, Tabby wrote:
    On Friday, 6 May 2022 at 12:28:24 UTC+1, Skybuck Flying wrote:
    Corona Update 25, 6 may 2022, Insurance Fraud, Killing the old and sick to safe money:

    The "Unsinkable" Titanic sinking may also have been an insurance fraud and bigger conspiracy again
    White star pulled pretty much the identical move years earlier with a previous ship. I forget the name & date.
    https://blog.pia.org/2021/04/15/did-the-owners-of-the-rms-titanic-commit-insurance-fraud/

    there's that idea too, but it's a separate question to whether the sinking was maybe deliberate. Their having pulled the exact same thing before paints a picture - I don't suppose we'll ever know for sure.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)