https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 07:21:10 -0700) it happened >jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in ><1p286h126b5jr3km7052fjuaugmb8scvrl@4ax.com>:
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
Not sure how serious I take that
I downloaded the 'datasheet' for the 'AFE8092 Octal-Channel RF Transceiver with Feedback Paths'
Not even a block diagram, and big pictures of ballgrid array but no pin function list.
so 4 Giggle samples per second ADCs... (after figuring out what GSPS stood for).
Not usable with that data.
But more and more integration indeed.
Too many pins...
Maybe just for thermal...
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
On 23/04/2022 16:21, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
Agreed - there's lots of interesting things there.
But can they actually deliver them? That's the big challenge these days.
On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 11:39:09 AM UTC-4, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 15:01:10 GMT) it happened Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote in <t414hf$qah$1...@dont-email.me>:
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 07:21:10 -0700) it happenedMy opinion
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<1p286h126b5jr3km7...@4ax.com>:
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
Not sure how serious I take that
I downloaded the 'datasheet' for the 'AFE8092 Octal-Channel RF Transceiver with Feedback Paths'
Not even a block diagram, and big pictures of ballgrid array but no pin function list.
so 4 Giggle samples per second ADCs... (after figuring out what GSPS stood for).
Not usable with that data.
But more and more integration indeed.
Too many pins...
Maybe just for thermal...
dataheet written by complete electronics moron
He explains ADC (but everybody doing electronics knows that)
but GSPS in capitals is the wrong notation for Gsamples/second.
What is the correct notation for giga samples/second?
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 15:01:10 GMT) it happened Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote in <t414hf$qah$1...@dont-email.me>:
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 07:21:10 -0700) it happened >jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<1p286h126b5jr3km7...@4ax.com>:
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
Not sure how serious I take that
I downloaded the 'datasheet' for the 'AFE8092 Octal-Channel RF Transceiver with Feedback Paths'
Not even a block diagram, and big pictures of ballgrid array but no pin function list.
so 4 Giggle samples per second ADCs... (after figuring out what GSPS stood for).
Not usable with that data.
But more and more integration indeed.
Too many pins...My opinion
Maybe just for thermal...
dataheet written by complete electronics moron
He explains ADC (but everybody doing electronics knows that)
but GSPS in capitals is the wrong notation for Gsamples/second.
On 2022-04-23 23:34, Ricky wrote:
On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 11:39:09 AM UTC-4, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 15:01:10 GMT) it happened Jan Panteltje >>> <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote in <t414hf$qah$1...@dont-email.me>:
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 07:21:10 -0700) it happenedMy opinion
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<1p286h126b5jr3km7...@4ax.com>:
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
Not sure how serious I take that
I downloaded the 'datasheet' for the 'AFE8092 Octal-Channel RF Transceiver with Feedback Paths'
Not even a block diagram, and big pictures of ballgrid array but no pin function list.
so 4 Giggle samples per second ADCs... (after figuring out what GSPS stood for).
Not usable with that data.
But more and more integration indeed.
Too many pins...
Maybe just for thermal...
dataheet written by complete electronics moron
He explains ADC (but everybody doing electronics knows that)
but GSPS in capitals is the wrong notation for Gsamples/second.
What is the correct notation for giga samples/second?
I'd go with Gsamples/s. In a sufficiently unambiguous context,
maybe GS/s will do. (They wouldn't be talking about the rate of
change of conductance in a treatise on ADCs, now, would they?)
'Samples' is the only unit without a universally accepted
abbreviation.
On 2022-04-23 23:34, Ricky wrote:
On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 11:39:09 AM UTC-4, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 15:01:10 GMT) it happened Jan Panteltje >> <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote in <t414hf$qah$1...@dont-email.me>:
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 07:21:10 -0700) it happenedMy opinion
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<1p286h126b5jr3km7...@4ax.com>:
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
Not sure how serious I take that
I downloaded the 'datasheet' for the 'AFE8092 Octal-Channel RF Transceiver with Feedback Paths'
Not even a block diagram, and big pictures of ballgrid array but no pin function list.
so 4 Giggle samples per second ADCs... (after figuring out what GSPS stood for).
Not usable with that data.
But more and more integration indeed.
Too many pins...
Maybe just for thermal...
dataheet written by complete electronics moron
He explains ADC (but everybody doing electronics knows that)
but GSPS in capitals is the wrong notation for Gsamples/second.
What is the correct notation for giga samples/second?
I'd go with Gsamples/s. In a sufficiently unambiguous context,
maybe GS/s will do. (They wouldn't be talking about the rate of
change of conductance in a treatise on ADCs, now, would they?)
'Samples' is the only unit without a universally accepted
abbreviation.
23.04.22 17:21, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
There was an episode of The Amp Hour a while back, interviewing a guy doings ASICs. He did over 50 designs per year, one guy
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
I tried to get some support for one TI part. The guy said "that's a Burr-Brown part, nobody knows much about that."
--
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
On 2022-04-23 18:58, David Brown wrote:
On 23/04/2022 16:21, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
Agreed - there's lots of interesting things there.
But can they actually deliver them? That's the big challenge these days.
More likely they're waiting to see who will order a few million.
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
And EVERYTING is out of stock. Vaporware for all practical purposes. How do you design something with some part that is "new" and unobtanium at the same time?
On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 3:51:11 AM UTC+10, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
On 2022-04-23 18:58, David Brown wrote:
On 23/04/2022 16:21, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
Agreed - there's lots of interesting things there.
But can they actually deliver them? That's the big challenge these days.
waiting to see if *anybody* will order a few million.More likely they're waiting to see who will order a few million.When I was much younger - in the 1970's - TI was known to publish a data sheet before they'd done the detailed design of the part. If it didn't generate enough orders, they didn't bother to complete the design or put it into production. They could be
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 07:21:10 -0700) it happened jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in <1p286h126b5jr3km7052fjuaugmb8scvrl@4ax.com>:
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
Not sure how serious I take that
I downloaded the 'datasheet' for the 'AFE8092 Octal-Channel RF Transceiver with Feedback Paths'
Not even a block diagram, and big pictures of ballgrid array but no pin function list.
so 4 Giggle samples per second ADCs... (after figuring out what GSPS stood for).
Not usable with that data.
But more and more integration indeed.
Too many pins...
Maybe just for thermal...
Am 23.04.22 um 17:01 schrieb Jan Panteltje:
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 07:21:10 -0700) it happened
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<1p286h126b5jr3km7052fjuaugmb8scvrl@4ax.com>:
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
Not sure how serious I take that
I downloaded the 'datasheet' for the 'AFE8092 Octal-Channel RF Transceiver with Feedback Paths'
Not even a block diagram, and big pictures of ballgrid array but no pin function list.
so 4 Giggle samples per second ADCs... (after figuring out what GSPS stood for).
If you have to google what GSPS stands for, you obviously have
no use for the full data sheet.
MSPS and GSPS is absolutely common.
< https://www.analog.com/en/parametricsearch/10826#/ >
Not usable with that data.
But more and more integration indeed.
Too many pins...
Maybe just for thermal...
blafasel.
Am 23.04.22 um 17:01 schrieb Jan Panteltje:
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 07:21:10 -0700) it happened
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<1p286h126b5jr3km7052fjuaugmb8scvrl@4ax.com>:
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
Not sure how serious I take that
I downloaded the 'datasheet' for the 'AFE8092 Octal-Channel RF
Transceiver with Feedback Paths'
Not even a block diagram, and big pictures of ballgrid array but no
pin function list.
so 4 Giggle samples per second ADCs... (after figuring out what GSPS
stood for).
If you have to google what GSPS stands for, you obviously have
no use for the full data sheet.
MSPS and GSPS is absolutely common.
I can make a thousand such "new parts" per month, all better than anything else and several times cheaper than existing best parts. The only problem is that those "new parts" don't really exist but who cares?
On 04/24/2022 03:41 AM, Sergey Kubushyn wrote:
I guess they're mimicking the financial Industry, now.
I can make a thousand such "new parts" per month, all better than anything >> else and several times cheaper than existing best parts. The only problem is >> that those "new parts" don't really exist but who cares?
On 04/24/2022 03:41 AM, Sergey Kubushyn wrote:
I guess they're mimicking the financial Industry, now.
I can make a thousand such "new parts" per month, all better than anything >> else and several times cheaper than existing best parts. The only problem is >> that those "new parts" don't really exist but who cares?
On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 5:47:36 PM UTC-4, Jeroen BellemanAnd that's just TI. Boggling.
wrote:
On 2022-04-23 23:34, Ricky wrote:
On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 11:39:09 AM UTC-4, Jan Panteltje
wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 15:01:10 GMT) it happened Jan
Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote in
<t414hf$qah$1...@dont-email.me>:
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 07:21:10 -0700) it happened
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<1p286h126b5jr3km7...@4ax.com>:
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
I'd go with Gsamples/s. In a sufficiently unambiguous context,My opinion dataheet written by complete electronics moron He
Not sure how serious I take that I downloaded the 'datasheet'
for the 'AFE8092 Octal-Channel RF Transceiver with Feedback
Paths'
Not even a block diagram, and big pictures of ballgrid array
but no pin function list. so 4 Giggle samples per second
ADCs... (after figuring out what GSPS stood for).
Not usable with that data.
But more and more integration indeed.
Too many pins... Maybe just for thermal...
explains ADC (but everybody doing electronics knows that) but
GSPS in capitals is the wrong notation for Gsamples/second.
What is the correct notation for giga samples/second?
maybe GS/s will do. (They wouldn't be talking about the rate of
change of conductance in a treatise on ADCs, now, would they?)
'Samples' is the only unit without a universally accepted
abbreviation.
I'm not following the thinking. Everyone I've met is comfortable
with the MSPS or even just SPS notation. Why is GSPS the odd duck?
Why is S not an accepted abbreviation for "samples"? Because it's
not an SI unit? Neither is HP, but in very common usage.
On 2022-04-24 01:39, Ricky wrote:
On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 5:47:36 PM UTC-4, Jeroen BellemanAnd that's just TI. Boggling.
wrote:
On 2022-04-23 23:34, Ricky wrote:
On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 11:39:09 AM UTC-4, Jan Panteltje
wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 15:01:10 GMT) it happened Jan
Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote in
<t414hf$qah$1...@dont-email.me>:
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 07:21:10 -0700) it happened
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<1p286h126b5jr3km7...@4ax.com>:
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
I'd go with Gsamples/s. In a sufficiently unambiguous context,My opinion dataheet written by complete electronics moron He
Not sure how serious I take that I downloaded the 'datasheet'
for the 'AFE8092 Octal-Channel RF Transceiver with Feedback
Paths'
Not even a block diagram, and big pictures of ballgrid array
but no pin function list. so 4 Giggle samples per second
ADCs... (after figuring out what GSPS stood for).
Not usable with that data.
But more and more integration indeed.
Too many pins... Maybe just for thermal...
explains ADC (but everybody doing electronics knows that) but
GSPS in capitals is the wrong notation for Gsamples/second.
What is the correct notation for giga samples/second?
maybe GS/s will do. (They wouldn't be talking about the rate of
change of conductance in a treatise on ADCs, now, would they?)
'Samples' is the only unit without a universally accepted
abbreviation.
I'm not following the thinking. Everyone I've met is comfortable
with the MSPS or even just SPS notation. Why is GSPS the odd duck?
Why is S not an accepted abbreviation for "samples"? Because it's
not an SI unit? Neither is HP, but in very common usage.
Oh, I understand it, but _I_ would write Gsamples/s, Msamples/s,
ksamples/s, etc. I'm OK with 'S' for 'samples' if the context
makes it unambiguous, I already said. I'm _not_ OK with 'S' for
'seconds'. It should be lower case 's'.
HP should be stamped out altogether. Use kW.
I'm a bit of a purist when it comes to units.
On 2022-04-24 01:39, Ricky wrote:
On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 5:47:36 PM UTC-4, Jeroen BellemanAnd that's just TI. Boggling.
wrote:
On 2022-04-23 23:34, Ricky wrote:
On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 11:39:09 AM UTC-4, Jan Panteltje
wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 15:01:10 GMT) it happened Jan
Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote in
<t414hf$qah$1...@dont-email.me>:
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 07:21:10 -0700) it happened
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<1p286h126b5jr3km7...@4ax.com>:
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
I'd go with Gsamples/s. In a sufficiently unambiguous context,My opinion dataheet written by complete electronics moron He
Not sure how serious I take that I downloaded the 'datasheet'
for the 'AFE8092 Octal-Channel RF Transceiver with Feedback
Paths'
Not even a block diagram, and big pictures of ballgrid array
but no pin function list. so 4 Giggle samples per second
ADCs... (after figuring out what GSPS stood for).
Not usable with that data.
But more and more integration indeed.
Too many pins... Maybe just for thermal...
explains ADC (but everybody doing electronics knows that) but
GSPS in capitals is the wrong notation for Gsamples/second.
What is the correct notation for giga samples/second?
maybe GS/s will do. (They wouldn't be talking about the rate of
change of conductance in a treatise on ADCs, now, would they?)
'Samples' is the only unit without a universally accepted
abbreviation.
I'm not following the thinking. Everyone I've met is comfortable
with the MSPS or even just SPS notation. Why is GSPS the odd duck?
Why is S not an accepted abbreviation for "samples"? Because it's
not an SI unit? Neither is HP, but in very common usage.
Oh, I understand it, but _I_ would write Gsamples/s, Msamples/s,
ksamples/s, etc. I'm OK with 'S' for 'samples' if the context
makes it unambiguous, I already said. I'm _not_ OK with 'S' for
'seconds'. It should be lower case 's'.
HP should be stamped out altogether. Use kW.
I'm a bit of a purist when it comes to units.
On 4/24/2022 17:01, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
On 2022-04-24 01:39, Ricky wrote:
On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 5:47:36 PM UTC-4, Jeroen BellemanAnd that's just TI. Boggling.
wrote:
On 2022-04-23 23:34, Ricky wrote:
On Saturday, April 23, 2022 at 11:39:09 AM UTC-4, Jan Panteltje
wrote:
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 15:01:10 GMT) it happened Jan
Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote in
<t414hf$qah$1...@dont-email.me>:
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 07:21:10 -0700) it happened
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<1p286h126b5jr3km7...@4ax.com>:
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
I'd go with Gsamples/s. In a sufficiently unambiguous context,My opinion dataheet written by complete electronics moron He
Not sure how serious I take that I downloaded the 'datasheet'
for the 'AFE8092 Octal-Channel RF Transceiver with Feedback
Paths'
Not even a block diagram, and big pictures of ballgrid array
but no pin function list. so 4 Giggle samples per second
ADCs... (after figuring out what GSPS stood for).
Not usable with that data.
But more and more integration indeed.
Too many pins... Maybe just for thermal...
explains ADC (but everybody doing electronics knows that) but
GSPS in capitals is the wrong notation for Gsamples/second.
What is the correct notation for giga samples/second?
maybe GS/s will do. (They wouldn't be talking about the rate of
change of conductance in a treatise on ADCs, now, would they?)
'Samples' is the only unit without a universally accepted
abbreviation.
I'm not following the thinking. Everyone I've met is comfortable
with the MSPS or even just SPS notation. Why is GSPS the odd duck?
Why is S not an accepted abbreviation for "samples"? Because it's
not an SI unit? Neither is HP, but in very common usage.
Oh, I understand it, but _I_ would write Gsamples/s, Msamples/s, ksamples/s, etc. I'm OK with 'S' for 'samples' if the contextCome on, MSPS is OK (of course I know you understand it).
makes it unambiguous, I already said. I'm _not_ OK with 'S' for
'seconds'. It should be lower case 's'.
BTW someone pointed me to the fact that I was wrongly using S for
seconds (had been doing so for ages) just 2-3 years ago, I
changed since - never too late to mend :-).
But I keep MSPS, somewhat resisting the temptation to write
MSPs, it is sort of an old idiom to me.
HP should be stamped out altogether. Use kW.Hah! I thought he meant Hewlet-Packard...(I really did).
I do think in Watts when it comes to power obviously, like
pretty much all of us, but when it comes to car/engine power
I think horse powers... (but in Bulgarian, so HP did not
speak to me).
I'm a bit of a purist when it comes to units.I am lax about it as long as things are clear enough, ambiguity
can be a killer. May be being a purist is better than my
attitude but, like John says, "we are what we are" :-).
And of course I hate inches, I always have to convert to mm
to grasp it. And for pounds, pints, gallons etc. I still have to
use the web...
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
--
I yam what I yam - Popeye
On a sunny day (Sat, 23 Apr 2022 07:21:10 -0700) it happened jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<1p286h126b5jr3km7...@4ax.com>:
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.Not sure how serious I take that
I downloaded the 'datasheet' for the 'AFE8092 Octal-Channel RF Transceiver with Feedback Paths'
Not even a block diagram, and big pictures of ballgrid array but no pin function list.
so 4 Giggle samples per second ADCs... (after figuring out what GSPS stood for).
Not usable with that data.
But more and more integration indeed.
Too many pins...
Maybe just for thermal...
I agree that HP can be abandoned without too much pain. I'd like to see
kWh go away, but would be replaced with Joules, a rather much smaller
unit. I believe there are 3,600 J to a Wh, so 3.6e6 J to a kWh. Grid
level values are often MWh which is 3.6e9 J. So J is not a convenient
unit for electrical stuff. The battery in my car is nominally 360 MJ...
I think. Did I do the conversion right? One of the nice features of
kWh in my car, is the battery is 100 kWh, making the conversion to/from
% rather easy.
Ricky <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:
I agree that HP can be abandoned without too much pain. I'd like to see kWh go away, but would be replaced with Joules, a rather much smaller unit. I believe there are 3,600 J to a Wh, so 3.6e6 J to a kWh. GridIs your car in Puerto Rico with you?
level values are often MWh which is 3.6e9 J. So J is not a convenient
unit for electrical stuff. The battery in my car is nominally 360 MJ...
I think. Did I do the conversion right? One of the nice features of
kWh in my car, is the battery is 100 kWh, making the conversion to/from
% rather easy.
Example: the AFE7903 does direct conversion at GHz speeds, mind boggling:
'With operation up to 7.4 GHz, this device
enables direct RF sampling in the HF, VHF, UHF,
L, S and C-band frequency ranges without the need
for additional frequency conversions stages."
Example: the AFE7903 does direct conversion at GHz speeds, mind boggling:
'With operation up to 7.4 GHz, this device
enables direct RF sampling in the HF, VHF, UHF,
L, S and C-band frequency ranges without the need
for additional frequency conversions stages."
On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 2:52:11 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
Example: the AFE7903 does direct conversion at GHz speeds, mind boggling:
'With operation up to 7.4 GHz, this deviceBoggling, but worthless, unless you have GHz bandwidth requirements
enables direct RF sampling in the HF, VHF, UHF,
L, S and C-band frequency ranges without the need
for additional frequency conversions stages."
in addition to GHz carrier requirements. Aperture time being small
also gives you GHz noise capability... not sure it's worth examining all
the bits in that firehose of a bit stream.
So, how much data does a channel-plate multiplier and streak camera output, per second? More, or less?
On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 9:02:38 PM UTC-7, whit3rd wrote:
On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 2:52:11 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
Example: the AFE7903 does direct conversion at GHz speeds, mind boggling:
'With operation up to 7.4 GHz, this deviceBoggling, but worthless, unless you have GHz bandwidth requirements
enables direct RF sampling in the HF, VHF, UHF,
L, S and C-band frequency ranges without the need
for additional frequency conversions stages."
in addition to GHz carrier requirements. Aperture time being small
also gives you GHz noise capability... not sure it's worth examining all the bits in that firehose of a bit stream.
So, how much data does a channel-plate multiplier and streak camera output,
per second? More, or less?
That would be most of the RF industry.
Is there some clinical name for a person who insults others in
conversation. Maybe that is Australian etiquette and protocol.
On 4/24/2022 17:01, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
What is the correct notation for giga samples/second?I'd go with Gsamples/s. In a sufficiently unambiguous context,
maybe GS/s will do. (They wouldn't be talking about the rate of
change of conductance in a treatise on ADCs, now, would they?)
'Samples' is the only unit without a universally accepted
abbreviation.
I'm not following the thinking. Everyone I've met is comfortable
with the MSPS or even just SPS notation. Why is GSPS the odd duck?
Why is S not an accepted abbreviation for "samples"? Because it's
not an SI unit? Neither is HP, but in very common usage.
Oh, I understand it, but _I_ would write Gsamples/s, Msamples/s, ksamples/s, etc. I'm OK with 'S' for 'samples' if the contextCome on, MSPS is OK (of course I know you understand it).
makes it unambiguous, I already said. I'm _not_ OK with 'S' for
'seconds'. It should be lower case 's'.
BTW someone pointed me to the fact that I was wrongly using S for
seconds (had been doing so for ages) just 2-3 years ago, I
changed since - never too late to mend :-).
But I keep MSPS, somewhat resisting the temptation to write
MSPs, it is sort of an old idiom to me.
If TI introduces, say, one new part per day, can they support them?
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
And EVERYTING is out of stock. Vaporware for all practical purposes. How do >you design something with some part that is "new" and unobtanium at the same >time?
I can make a thousand such "new parts" per month, all better than anything >else and several times cheaper than existing best parts. The only problem is >that those "new parts" don't really exist but who cares?
---
******************************************************************
* KSI@home KOI8 Net < > The impossible we do immediately. *
* Las Vegas NV, USA < > Miracles require 24-hour notice. * >******************************************************************
On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 3:01:44 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:were, but I'd have to do quite a bit of digging to find out how fast current versions (if they still exist) can collect data or transfer it into mass memory.
On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 9:02:38 PM UTC-7, whit3rd wrote:
On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 2:52:11 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
Example: the AFE7903 does direct conversion at GHz speeds, mind boggling:
'With operation up to 7.4 GHz, this deviceBoggling, but worthless, unless you have GHz bandwidth requirements
enables direct RF sampling in the HF, VHF, UHF,
L, S and C-band frequency ranges without the need
for additional frequency conversions stages."
in addition to GHz carrier requirements. Aperture time being small
also gives you GHz noise capability... not sure it's worth examining all the bits in that firehose of a bit stream.
So, how much data does a channel-plate multiplier and streak camera output,
per second? More, or less?
That would be most of the RF industry.Flyguy missed the point by a country mile. He doesn't miss many opportunities to remind us how dim and ill-informed he is, but this effort is more comical than most.
A channel plate multiplier and a streak camera do have a lot of bandwidth, but once you captured a screen's worth of data you have to scan the screen, and digitise and store the result before you can collect another. Unlike Flygyuy, I do know what they
Cambridge Instruments did use a channel plate multiplier in the EBMF 10.5 electron beam microfabricator, but it was used as a thin electron multiplier. It was bit faster than regular photomultiplier tubes but only because the electrons didn't have asfar to go. The streak camera would have been the quick bit.
--
SNIPPERMAN, Sydney
On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 2:52:11 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
Example: the AFE7903 does direct conversion at GHz speeds, mind
boggling:
'With operation up to 7.4 GHz, this device enables direct RF
sampling in the HF, VHF, UHF, L, S and C-band frequency ranges
without the need for additional frequency conversions stages."
Boggling, but worthless, unless you have GHz bandwidth requirements
in addition to GHz carrier requirements. Aperture time being small
also gives you GHz noise capability... not sure it's worth examining
all the bits in that firehose of a bit stream.
So, how much data does a channel-plate multiplier and streak camera
output, per second? More, or less?
On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 2:52:11 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
Example: the AFE7903 does direct conversion at GHz speeds, mind boggling:
'With operation up to 7.4 GHz, this device
enables direct RF sampling in the HF, VHF, UHF,
L, S and C-band frequency ranges without the need
for additional frequency conversions stages."
Boggling, but worthless, unless you have GHz bandwidth requirements
in addition to GHz carrier requirements. Aperture time being small
also gives you GHz noise capability... not sure it's worth examining all
the bits in that firehose of a bit stream.
So, how much data does a channel-plate multiplier and streak camera output, >per second? More, or less?
On Sun, 24 Apr 2022 21:02:34 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 2:52:11 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
Example: the AFE7903 does direct conversion at GHz speeds, mind boggling: >>>
'With operation up to 7.4 GHz, this device
enables direct RF sampling in the HF, VHF, UHF,
L, S and C-band frequency ranges without the need
for additional frequency conversions stages."
Boggling, but worthless, unless you have GHz bandwidth requirements
in addition to GHz carrier requirements. Aperture time being small
also gives you GHz noise capability... not sure it's worth examining all
the bits in that firehose of a bit stream.
So, how much data does a channel-plate multiplier and streak camera output, >> per second? More, or less?
Next-gen wireless networks will have frequency hopping, radical
constellation coding, synthetic antenna aiming, all sorts of nasty
stuff. It makes sense to digitize the antenna signal and do all the
fancy stuff digitally.
The market will be enormous. Envision hundreds of millions of little
6G boxes on telephone poles all over the world.
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 15:16:25 -0400, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 24 Apr 2022 21:02:34 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 2:52:11 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
Example: the AFE7903 does direct conversion at GHz speeds, mind boggling: >>>>>
'With operation up to 7.4 GHz, this device
enables direct RF sampling in the HF, VHF, UHF,
L, S and C-band frequency ranges without the need
for additional frequency conversions stages."
Boggling, but worthless, unless you have GHz bandwidth requirements
in addition to GHz carrier requirements. Aperture time being small
also gives you GHz noise capability... not sure it's worth examining all >>>> the bits in that firehose of a bit stream.
So, how much data does a channel-plate multiplier and streak camera output,
per second? More, or less?
Next-gen wireless networks will have frequency hopping, radical
constellation coding, synthetic antenna aiming, all sorts of nasty
stuff. It makes sense to digitize the antenna signal and do all the
fancy stuff digitally.
The market will be enormous. Envision hundreds of millions of little
6G boxes on telephone poles all over the world.
Bringing streaming 16K videos of cute kittens to everybody's car.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
I want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi,
home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything.
Privacy is over-rated.
John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 24 Apr 2022 21:02:34 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 2:52:11 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
Example: the AFE7903 does direct conversion at GHz speeds, mind boggling: >>>>
'With operation up to 7.4 GHz, this device
enables direct RF sampling in the HF, VHF, UHF,
L, S and C-band frequency ranges without the need
for additional frequency conversions stages."
Boggling, but worthless, unless you have GHz bandwidth requirements
in addition to GHz carrier requirements. Aperture time being small
also gives you GHz noise capability... not sure it's worth examining all >>> the bits in that firehose of a bit stream.
So, how much data does a channel-plate multiplier and streak camera output, >>> per second? More, or less?
Next-gen wireless networks will have frequency hopping, radical
constellation coding, synthetic antenna aiming, all sorts of nasty
stuff. It makes sense to digitize the antenna signal and do all the
fancy stuff digitally.
The market will be enormous. Envision hundreds of millions of little
6G boxes on telephone poles all over the world.
Bringing streaming 16K videos of cute kittens to everybody's car.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 15:16:25 -0400, Phil HobbsUntil your social credit score gets too low and they punt you from
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 24 Apr 2022 21:02:34 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Sunday, April 24, 2022 at 2:52:11 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
Example: the AFE7903 does direct conversion at GHz speeds, mind boggling:
'With operation up to 7.4 GHz, this device
enables direct RF sampling in the HF, VHF, UHF,
L, S and C-band frequency ranges without the need
for additional frequency conversions stages."
Boggling, but worthless, unless you have GHz bandwidth requirements
in addition to GHz carrier requirements. Aperture time being small >>>>> also gives you GHz noise capability... not sure it's worth examining all >>>>> the bits in that firehose of a bit stream.
So, how much data does a channel-plate multiplier and streak camera output,
per second? More, or less?
Next-gen wireless networks will have frequency hopping, radical
constellation coding, synthetic antenna aiming, all sorts of nasty
stuff. It makes sense to digitize the antenna signal and do all the
fancy stuff digitally.
The market will be enormous. Envision hundreds of millions of little
6G boxes on telephone poles all over the world.
Bringing streaming 16K videos of cute kittens to everybody's car.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
I want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi,
home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything.
Privacy is over-rated.
everything at once.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
Is there some clinical name for a person who insults others in
conversation. Maybe that is Australian etiquette and protocol.
I want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi,Until your social credit score gets too low and they punt you from >everything at once.
home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything.
Privacy is over-rated.
Cheers
Phil HobbsBut they can't punt everyone. In the USA at least, people would still
pay someone for the service and for bandwidth (I guess) so nobody
would be in charge and someone loses revenue if they lose a customer.
Capitalism will find a way.
John Larkin wrote:
I want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi,Until your social credit score gets too low and they punt you from
home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything.
Privacy is over-rated.
everything at once.
I want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi,
home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything.
Privacy is over-rated.
On Wednesday, 27 April 2022 at 21:52:04 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
But they can't punt everyone. In the USA at least, people would still
pay someone for the service and for bandwidth (I guess) so nobody
would be in charge and someone loses revenue if they lose a customer.
Capitalism will find a way.
Dictatorship outranks capitalism.
On Wednesday, 27 April 2022 at 21:52:04 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
But they can't punt everyone. In the USA at least, people would stillI want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi,Until your social credit score gets too low and they punt you from
home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything.
Privacy is over-rated.
everything at once.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
pay someone for the service and for bandwidth (I guess) so nobody
would be in charge and someone loses revenue if they lose a customer.
Capitalism will find a way.
Dictatorship outranks capitalism.
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:18:20 -0700 (PDT), Tabby <tabbypurr@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 April 2022 at 21:52:04 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
But they can't punt everyone. In the USA at least, people would stillI want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi, >>> >> home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything. >>> >>Until your social credit score gets too low and they punt you from
Privacy is over-rated.
everything at once.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
pay someone for the service and for bandwidth (I guess) so nobody
would be in charge and someone loses revenue if they lose a customer.
Capitalism will find a way.
Dictatorship outranks capitalism.
Dictators, like Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Putin, think they understand
everything and then want to control everything. They kill hundreds of >millions.
"Capitalism" really means pluralism, letting lots of sane and crazy
people try things to see what actually works.
On a sunny day (Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:33:48 -0700) it happened >jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in ><o8gl6hpqq0s2truck4h0380vqa9kr1i8b1@4ax.com>:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:18:20 -0700 (PDT), Tabby <tabbypurr@gmail.com> >>wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 April 2022 at 21:52:04 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
But they can't punt everyone. In the USA at least, people would stillI want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi, >>>> >> home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything. >>>> >>Until your social credit score gets too low and they punt you from
Privacy is over-rated.
everything at once.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
pay someone for the service and for bandwidth (I guess) so nobody
would be in charge and someone loses revenue if they lose a customer.
Capitalism will find a way.
Dictatorship outranks capitalism.
Dictators, like Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Putin, think they understand >>everything and then want to control everything. They kill hundreds of >>millions.
Yes you US have a milli-tairy Industrial Complex that killed millions recently >with covid they designed.
As you did in Vietnam with Agent Orange, the list is much longer.
As you did in the war Bill Clignon, an other deamon crate, started in Europe >ByeThen is not even original
I think Putin is merely defending his people.
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 12:56:42 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
I want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi,
home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything.
Privacy is over-rated.
That's a laugh; Internet range is out to near Earth orbit, and you want your >utility meters to compete for that against your TV remote control? One network
isn't the answer, any more than one TV channel is the answer.
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 02:00:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 12:56:42 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
I want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi,
home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything.
Privacy is over-rated.
That's a laugh; Internet range is out to near Earth orbit, and you want your >> utility meters to compete for that against your TV remote control? One network
isn't the answer, any more than one TV channel is the answer.
What we have is a mess. Many cell companies have various spotty
coverage. Ditto cable TV and internet providers. Once people manage to
get an internet provider, they have to install their own cables and
wifi. Wires are strung on poles, sidewalks are dug up, dishes point everywhere and rust or get blown away. People pay for multiple
services.
One uniform microcell mesh system would eliminate all that.
Imagine progress.
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 02:00:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 12:56:42 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
I want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi,
home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything.
Privacy is over-rated.
That's a laugh; Internet range is out to near Earth orbit, and you want your >>utility meters to compete for that against your TV remote control? One network
isn't the answer, any more than one TV channel is the answer.
What we have is a mess. Many cell companies have various spotty
coverage. Ditto cable TV and internet providers. Once people manage to
get an internet provider, they have to install their own cables and
wifi. Wires are strung on poles, sidewalks are dug up, dishes point everywhere and rust or get blown away. People pay for multiple
services.
One uniform microcell mesh system would eliminate all that.
On 2022-04-28, John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 02:00:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 12:56:42 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
I want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi, >>>> home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything.
Privacy is over-rated.
That's a laugh; Internet range is out to near Earth orbit, and you want your >>>utility meters to compete for that against your TV remote control? One network
isn't the answer, any more than one TV channel is the answer.
What we have is a mess. Many cell companies have various spotty
coverage. Ditto cable TV and internet providers. Once people manage to
get an internet provider, they have to install their own cables and
wifi. Wires are strung on poles, sidewalks are dug up, dishes point
everywhere and rust or get blown away. People pay for multiple
services.
One uniform microcell mesh system would eliminate all that.
The liberals will never go for that, the current mess is too
proffitable, those further to the right even more so.
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 02:00:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 12:56:42 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
I want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi,
home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything.
Privacy is over-rated.
That's a laugh; Internet range is out to near Earth orbit, and you want your >utility meters to compete for that against your TV remote control? One network
isn't the answer, any more than one TV channel is the answer.
What we have is a mess. Many cell companies have various spotty
coverage. Ditto cable TV and internet providers. Once people manage to
get an internet provider, they have to install their own cables and
wifi. Wires are strung on poles, sidewalks are dug up, dishes point everywhere and rust or get blown away. People pay for multiple
services.
One uniform microcell mesh system would eliminate all that.
Imagine progress.
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 20:06:46 -0000 (UTC), Jasen Betts <use...@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:
On 2022-04-28, John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 02:00:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 12:56:42 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
One uniform microcell mesh system would eliminate all that.
The liberals will never go for that, the current mess is too profitable, those further to the right even more so.
Then nothing will ever change. Progress has stopped.
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 17:05:59 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:33:48 -0700) it happened >>jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in >><o8gl6hpqq0s2truck4h0380vqa9kr1i8b1@4ax.com>:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:18:20 -0700 (PDT), Tabby <tabbypurr@gmail.com> >>>wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 April 2022 at 21:52:04 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
But they can't punt everyone. In the USA at least, people would still >>>>> pay someone for the service and for bandwidth (I guess) so nobodyI want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi, >>>>> >> home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything. >>>>> >>Until your social credit score gets too low and they punt you from
Privacy is over-rated.
everything at once.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
would be in charge and someone loses revenue if they lose a customer. >>>>>
Capitalism will find a way.
Dictatorship outranks capitalism.
Dictators, like Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Putin, think they understand >>>everything and then want to control everything. They kill hundreds of >>>millions.
Yes you US have a milli-tairy Industrial Complex that killed millions recently
with covid they designed.
It started at the lab in china.
As you did in Vietnam with Agent Orange, the list is much longer.
As you did in the war Bill Clignon, an other deamon crate, started in Europe >>ByeThen is not even original
I think Putin is merely defending his people.
Defending? Against what?
On a sunny day (Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:05:36 -0700) it happened John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
<4apl6hlk37vd1381d...@4ax.com>:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 17:05:59 GMT, Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:33:48 -0700) it happened >>jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in <o8gl6hpqq0s2truck...@4ax.com>: >>>On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:18:20 -0700 (PDT), Tabby <tabb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>On Wednesday, 27 April 2022 at 21:52:04 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
Capitalism will find a way.
Dictatorship outranks capitalism.
Dictators, like Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Putin, think they understand everything and then want to control everything. They kill hundreds of millions.
Yes you US have a millitary Industrial Complex that killed millions recently with covid they designed.
It started at the lab in china.
US mini-tary Industrial Complex has dangerous research done in labs they finance all over the world, far away from their own bed.
Backfired in this case, as it did with HIV.
As you did in Vietnam with Agent Orange, the list is much longer.
As you did in the war Bill Clinton, an other Democrat started in Europe.
Biden is not even original.
I think Putin is merely defending his people.
Defending? Against what?
Against what you called quote:
"Capitalism" really means pluralism, letting lots of sane and crazy people try things to see what actually works."
The crazy part is strong these days, Fauci a mass murderer,
Biden -the one with vacuum bubbles in his brain and his imported slaves- a dictator.
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:32:09 -0700 (PDT)) it happened
Bill Sloman expressed scepticism
You are a waste of time!
Mental age < 10
IQ=
But they can't punt everyone. In the USA at least, people would still
pay someone for the service and for bandwidth (I guess) so nobody
would be in charge and someone loses revenue if they lose a customer.
Capitalism will find a way.
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 17:05:59 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Yes you US have a milli-tairy Industrial Complex that killed millions recentlyIt started at the lab in china.
with covid they designed.
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 02:00:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 12:56:42 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
I want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi,
home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything.
Privacy is over-rated.
That's a laugh; Internet range is out to near Earth orbit, and you want your >utility meters to compete for that against your TV remote control? One networkWhat we have is a mess. Many cell companies have various spotty
isn't the answer, any more than one TV channel is the answer.
coverage. Ditto cable TV and internet providers. Once people manage to
get an internet provider, they have to install their own cables and
wifi. Wires are strung on poles, sidewalks are dug up, dishes point everywhere and rust or get blown away. People pay for multiple
services.
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 00:32:09 -0700 (PDT)) it happened
Billy Slowman spit crap again
You are a waste of time!
Mental age < 10
IQ=
On a sunny day (Thu, 28 Apr 2022 12:05:36 -0700) it happened John Larkin ><jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in ><4apl6hlk37vd1381ddnod84vfq4bv44gr1@4ax.com>:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 17:05:59 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:33:48 -0700) it happened >>>jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in >>><o8gl6hpqq0s2truck4h0380vqa9kr1i8b1@4ax.com>:
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:18:20 -0700 (PDT), Tabby <tabbypurr@gmail.com> >>>>wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 April 2022 at 21:52:04 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
But they can't punt everyone. In the USA at least, people would still >>>>>> pay someone for the service and for bandwidth (I guess) so nobodyI want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi,Until your social credit score gets too low and they punt you from >>>>>> >everything at once.
home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything. >>>>>> >>
Privacy is over-rated.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
would be in charge and someone loses revenue if they lose a customer. >>>>>>
Capitalism will find a way.
Dictatorship outranks capitalism.
Dictators, like Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Putin, think they understand >>>>everything and then want to control everything. They kill hundreds of >>>>millions.
Yes you US have a milli-tairy Industrial Complex that killed millions recently
with covid they designed.
It started at the lab in china.
US mini-tary Industrial Complex has dangerous research done in labs they finance all over the world,
far away from their own bed.
Backfired in this case, as it did wih HIV.
As you did in Vietnam with Agent Orange, the list is much longer.
As you did in the war Bill Clignon, an other deamon crate, started in Europe >>>ByeThen is not even original
I think Putin is merely defending his people.
Defending? Against what?
Against what you called quote:
"Capitalism" really means pluralism,
letting lots of sane and crazy people try things to see what actually works."
_______________^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The crazy part is strong these days, Fauci a mass murderer,
Biden -the one with vacuum bubbles in his brain and his imported slaves- a dictator.
Russia has one insane person in charge. Millions will die.
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:26:11 -0700) it happened >jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in ><iatn6hlijku89m4aoo1hvanqlfc28im5c7@4ax.com>:
Russia has one insane person in charge. Millions will die.
Well, that could be you.
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:46:18 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:26:11 -0700) it happened >>jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in >><iatn6hlijku89m4aoo1hvanqlfc28im5c7@4ax.com>:
Russia has one insane person in charge. Millions will die.
Well, that could be you.
Unikely. The deaths will be from disease and starvation in poor
countries. They are already suffering from covid lockdown side
effects.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01022-x
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:33:45 -0700) it happened >jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in ><j31o6hhsnroa0mm1bgqja8osaamn55luhs@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:46:18 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:26:11 -0700) it happened >>>jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in >>><iatn6hlijku89m4aoo1hvanqlfc28im5c7@4ax.com>:
Russia has one insane person in charge. Millions will die.
Well, that could be you.
Unikely. The deaths will be from disease and starvation in poor
countries. They are already suffering from covid lockdown side
effects.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01022-x
The war ByeThen provoked in Ukraine
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:49:42 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:33:45 -0700) it happened >>jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in >><j31o6hhsnroa0mm1bgqja8osaamn55luhs@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:46:18 GMT, Jan Panteltje >>><pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:26:11 -0700) it happened >>>>jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in >>>><iatn6hlijku89m4aoo1hvanqlfc28im5c7@4ax.com>:
Russia has one insane person in charge. Millions will die.
Well, that could be you.
Unikely. The deaths will be from disease and starvation in poor >>>countries. They are already suffering from covid lockdown side
effects.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01022-x
The war ByeThen provoked in Ukraine
How did he do that?
Did the US and Ukraine attack Russia?
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:02:25 -0700) it happened John Larkin ><jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in ><ve6o6hp5q5bet379q1lt5u53v5t2gasq4n@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:49:42 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:33:45 -0700) it happened >>>jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in >>><j31o6hhsnroa0mm1bgqja8osaamn55luhs@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:46:18 GMT, Jan Panteltje >>>><pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:26:11 -0700) it happened >>>>>jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in >>>>><iatn6hlijku89m4aoo1hvanqlfc28im5c7@4ax.com>:
Russia has one insane person in charge. Millions will die.
Well, that could be you.
Unikely. The deaths will be from disease and starvation in poor >>>>countries. They are already suffering from covid lockdown side
effects.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01022-x
The war ByeThen provoked in Ukraine
How did he do that?
Did the US and Ukraine attack Russia?
By breaking the 2014 peace deal by stuffing more weapons directly on the Russian border
supporting Ukraine in making Donbas its own, the usual CIA shit
with shitlensky their sad puppet.
US does that everywhere: sanctions, Cuba, Venezuela, steal their money
break deals (Iran), force injustice (International court in the Hague here >should now sue Russia for war crimes, but Bushman threatened to invade here when it
wanted to sue US soldiers for war crimes.
I was just reading this:
https://www.rt.com/russia/554720-china-us-goals-ukraine/
that site has the views you should also check, not only what ByeThen and his puppet press spews at you.
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:02:25 -0700) it happened John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in <ve6o6hp5q5bet379q...@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:49:42 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
The war ByeThen provoked in Ukraine
How did he do that?
Did the US and Ukraine attack Russia?
By breaking the 2014 peace deal by stuffing more weapons directly on the Russian border
supporting Ukraine in making Donbas its own, the usual CIA shit
with shitlensky their sad puppet.
US does that everywhere:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:14:43 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:02:25 -0700) it happened John Larkin
<jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
<ve6o6hp5q5bet379q1lt5u53v5t2gasq4n@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:49:42 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:33:45 -0700) it happened
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<j31o6hhsnroa0mm1bgqja8osaamn55luhs@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:46:18 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:26:11 -0700) it happened
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<iatn6hlijku89m4aoo1hvanqlfc28im5c7@4ax.com>:
Russia has one insane person in charge. Millions will die.
Well, that could be you.
Unikely. The deaths will be from disease and starvation in poor
countries. They are already suffering from covid lockdown side
effects.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01022-x
The war ByeThen provoked in Ukraine
How did he do that?
Did the US and Ukraine attack Russia?
By breaking the 2014 peace deal by stuffing more weapons directly on the Russian border
supporting Ukraine in making Donbas its own, the usual CIA shit
with shitlensky their sad puppet.
US does that everywhere: sanctions, Cuba, Venezuela, steal their money
break deals (Iran), force injustice (International court in the Hague here >> should now sue Russia for war crimes, but Bushman threatened to invade here when it
wanted to sue US soldiers for war crimes.
I was just reading this:
https://www.rt.com/russia/554720-china-us-goals-ukraine/
that site has the views you should also check, not only what ByeThen and his puppet press spews at you.
Putin has pounded Ukrainian cities to rubble. And created millions of refugees. And damaged the food supply to millions in other countries.
Any you blame the US?
On 4/29/2022 20:43, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:14:43 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:02:25 -0700) it happened John Larkin >>> <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
<ve6o6hp5q5bet379q1lt5u53v5t2gasq4n@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:49:42 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:33:45 -0700) it happened
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<j31o6hhsnroa0mm1bgqja8osaamn55luhs@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:46:18 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:26:11 -0700) it happened
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<iatn6hlijku89m4aoo1hvanqlfc28im5c7@4ax.com>:
Russia has one insane person in charge. Millions will die.
Well, that could be you.
Unikely. The deaths will be from disease and starvation in poor
countries. They are already suffering from covid lockdown side
effects.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01022-x
The war ByeThen provoked in Ukraine
How did he do that?
Did the US and Ukraine attack Russia?
By breaking the 2014 peace deal by stuffing more weapons directly on the Russian border
supporting Ukraine in making Donbas its own, the usual CIA shit
with shitlensky their sad puppet.
US does that everywhere: sanctions, Cuba, Venezuela, steal their money
break deals (Iran), force injustice (International court in the Hague here >>> should now sue Russia for war crimes, but Bushman threatened to invade here when it
wanted to sue US soldiers for war crimes.
I was just reading this:
https://www.rt.com/russia/554720-china-us-goals-ukraine/
that site has the views you should also check, not only what ByeThen and his puppet press spews at you.
Putin has pounded Ukrainian cities to rubble. And created millions of
refugees. And damaged the food supply to millions in other countries.
Any you blame the US?
What do you expect of someone following Russian media.
You won't believe the sort of utter nonsense they pour all the time
and yes, there are people who do believe it - not because it is not >laughable, it is of course, but because there are people wanting to
believe it out of hatred to the US, EU etc.
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:14:43 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:02:25 -0700) it happened John Larkin
<jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
<ve6o6hp5q5bet379q1lt5u53v5t2gasq4n@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:49:42 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:33:45 -0700) it happened
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<j31o6hhsnroa0mm1bgqja8osaamn55luhs@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:46:18 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:26:11 -0700) it happened
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<iatn6hlijku89m4aoo1hvanqlfc28im5c7@4ax.com>:
Russia has one insane person in charge. Millions will die.
Well, that could be you.
Unikely. The deaths will be from disease and starvation in poor
countries. They are already suffering from covid lockdown side
effects.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01022-x
The war ByeThen provoked in Ukraine
How did he do that?
Did the US and Ukraine attack Russia?
By breaking the 2014 peace deal by stuffing more weapons directly on the Russian border
supporting Ukraine in making Donbas its own, the usual CIA shit
with shitlensky their sad puppet.
US does that everywhere: sanctions, Cuba, Venezuela, steal their money
break deals (Iran), force injustice (International court in the Hague here >> should now sue Russia for war crimes, but Bushman threatened to invade here when it
wanted to sue US soldiers for war crimes.
I was just reading this:
https://www.rt.com/russia/554720-china-us-goals-ukraine/
that site has the views you should also check, not only what ByeThen and his puppet press spews at you.
Putin has pounded Ukrainian cities to rubble. And created millions of refugees. And damaged the food supply to millions in other countries.
Any you blame the US?
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:36:37 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com>
wrote:
On 4/29/2022 20:43, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:14:43 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:02:25 -0700) it happened John Larkin >>>> <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
<ve6o6hp5q5bet379q1lt5u53v5t2gasq4n@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:49:42 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:33:45 -0700) it happened
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<j31o6hhsnroa0mm1bgqja8osaamn55luhs@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:46:18 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:26:11 -0700) it happened
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<iatn6hlijku89m4aoo1hvanqlfc28im5c7@4ax.com>:
Russia has one insane person in charge. Millions will die.
Well, that could be you.
Unikely. The deaths will be from disease and starvation in poor
countries. They are already suffering from covid lockdown side
effects.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01022-x
The war ByeThen provoked in Ukraine
How did he do that?
Did the US and Ukraine attack Russia?
By breaking the 2014 peace deal by stuffing more weapons directly on the Russian border
supporting Ukraine in making Donbas its own, the usual CIA shit
with shitlensky their sad puppet.
US does that everywhere: sanctions, Cuba, Venezuela, steal their money >>>> break deals (Iran), force injustice (International court in the Hague here >>>> should now sue Russia for war crimes, but Bushman threatened to invade here when it
wanted to sue US soldiers for war crimes.
I was just reading this:
https://www.rt.com/russia/554720-china-us-goals-ukraine/
that site has the views you should also check, not only what ByeThen and his puppet press spews at you.
Putin has pounded Ukrainian cities to rubble. And created millions of
refugees. And damaged the food supply to millions in other countries.
Any you blame the US?
What do you expect of someone following Russian media.
You won't believe the sort of utter nonsense they pour all the time
and yes, there are people who do believe it - not because it is not
laughable, it is of course, but because there are people wanting to
believe it out of hatred to the US, EU etc.
Why do so many people hate the US?
Maybe it's the chinese proverb: If you save someone's life, they will
hate you forever.
A lot of USians hate California. They fear that it's as wonderful as
the rumors suggest. It is.
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:36:37 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <d...@tgi-sci.com> wrote: >On 4/29/2022 20:43, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:14:43 GMT, Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:02:25 -0700) it happened John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in <ve6o6hp5q5bet379q...@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:49:42 GMT, Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:33:45 -0700) it happened jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in <j31o6hhsnroa0mm1b...@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:46:18 GMT, Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:26:11 -0700) it happened jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in <iatn6hlijku89m4ao...@4ax.com>:
Russia has one insane person in charge. Millions will die.
Well, that could be you.
Unikely. The deaths will be from disease and starvation in poor countries. They are already suffering from covid lockdown side effects.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01022-x
The war ByeThen provoked in Ukraine
How did he do that?
Did the US and Ukraine attack Russia?
By breaking the 2014 peace deal by stuffing more weapons directly on the Russian border.
supporting Ukraine in making Donbas its own,
the usual CIA shit with Zelensky their sad puppet.
Putin has pounded Ukrainian cities to rubble. And created millions of
refugees. And damaged the food supply to millions in other countries.
Any you blame the US?
What do you expect of someone following Russian media.
You won't believe the sort of utter nonsense they pour all the time
and yes, there are people who do believe it - not because it is not >laughable, it is of course, but because there are people wanting to >believe it out of hatred to the US, EU etc.
Why do so many people hate the US?
Maybe it's the chinese proverb: If you save someone's life, they will hate you forever.
John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:36:37 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com>
wrote:
On 4/29/2022 20:43, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:14:43 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:02:25 -0700) it happened John Larkin >>>>> <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
<ve6o6hp5q5bet379q1lt5u53v5t2gasq4n@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:49:42 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:33:45 -0700) it happened
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<j31o6hhsnroa0mm1bgqja8osaamn55luhs@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:46:18 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:26:11 -0700) it happened >>>>>>>>> jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<iatn6hlijku89m4aoo1hvanqlfc28im5c7@4ax.com>:
Russia has one insane person in charge. Millions will die.
Well, that could be you.
Unikely. The deaths will be from disease and starvation in poor >>>>>>>> countries. They are already suffering from covid lockdown side >>>>>>>> effects.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01022-x
The war ByeThen provoked in Ukraine
How did he do that?
Did the US and Ukraine attack Russia?
By breaking the 2014 peace deal by stuffing more weapons directly on the Russian border
supporting Ukraine in making Donbas its own, the usual CIA shit
with shitlensky their sad puppet.
US does that everywhere: sanctions, Cuba, Venezuela, steal their money >>>>> break deals (Iran), force injustice (International court in the Hague here
should now sue Russia for war crimes, but Bushman threatened to invade here when it
wanted to sue US soldiers for war crimes.
I was just reading this:
https://www.rt.com/russia/554720-china-us-goals-ukraine/
that site has the views you should also check, not only what ByeThen and his puppet press spews at you.
Putin has pounded Ukrainian cities to rubble. And created millions of
refugees. And damaged the food supply to millions in other countries.
Any you blame the US?
What do you expect of someone following Russian media.
You won't believe the sort of utter nonsense they pour all the time
and yes, there are people who do believe it - not because it is not
laughable, it is of course, but because there are people wanting to
believe it out of hatred to the US, EU etc.
Why do so many people hate the US?
Maybe it's the chinese proverb: If you save someone's life, they will
hate you forever.
A lot of USians hate California. They fear that it's as wonderful as
the rumors suggest. It is.
Nah, I've lived in California and I dislike it too. It's not the
individual people, just the plastic ambiance and the relentless brown of
the vegetation for most of the year.
Nice enough place to visit, and of course I still have some good friends >there, which makes it reasonably OK in small-to-medium doses. ;)
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:46:18 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:26:11 -0700) it happened >jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<iatn6hlijku89m4ao...@4ax.com>:
Russia has one insane person in charge. Millions will die.
Well, that could be you.
Unlikely. The deaths will be from disease and starvation in poor
countries. They are already suffering from covid lockdown side
effects.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01022-x
On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 10:14:51 AM UTC-7, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:02:25 -0700) it happened John Larkin
<jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
<ve6o6hp5q5bet379q...@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:49:42 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
The war ByeThen provoked in Ukraine
How did he do that?
Did the US and Ukraine attack Russia?
By breaking the 2014 peace deal by stuffing more weapons directly on the Russian border
... well, that 'more weapons' thing is in the news, but it happened AFTER Russia attacked.
As a cause-and=effect theory, that's backward.
supporting Ukraine in making Donbas its own, the usual CIA shit
Donbas was invaded, and Ukraine response was relatively mild; as for CIA,
US intelligence did note that Russia was about to invade Ukraine; isn't that a good
thing? European wars always spread, the rest of the world HAS to have good >intelligence to cope intelligently.
with shitlensky their sad puppet.
The 'puppet' word is either a baseless insult, or a bit of propoganda, but not >in correspondence with the reality of an elected leader of a democratic nation.
US does that everywhere:
If Jan smells excrement everywhere he goes, I know what the source
of that odor is.
Putin has pounded Ukrainian cities to rubble. And created millions of >refugees. And damaged the food supply to millions in other countries.
Any you blame the US?
I studied America for 6 months. Traveled, researched, subscribed to >newspapers. I decided it would be Portland or San Francisco, and the
pollen counts favored SF. It's wonderful is you just ignore the
people.
Nice enough place to visit, and of course I still have some good friends >>there, which makes it reasonably OK in small-to-medium doses. ;)
I'm small-to-medium.
https://www.ti.com/prod-list/new-products?releasePeriod=364
And that's just TI. Boggling.
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:27:10 -0700 (PDT)) it happened whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote in
<d57fd738-17cc-4b21...@googlegroups.com>:
On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 10:14:51 AM UTC-7, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:02:25 -0700) it happened John Larkin >> <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
<ve6o6hp5q5bet379q...@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:49:42 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
The war ByeThen provoked in Ukraine
How did he do that?
Did the US and Ukraine attack Russia?
By breaking the 2014 peace deal by stuffing more weapons directly on the Russian border
... well, that 'more weapons' thing is in the news, but it happened AFTER Russia attacked.
As a cause-and=effect theory, that's backward.
supporting Ukraine in making Donbas its own, the usual CIA shit
Donbas was invaded, and Ukraine response was relatively mild; as for CIA, >US intelligence did note that Russia was about to invade Ukraine; isn't that a good
thing? European wars always spread, the rest of the world HAS to have good >intelligence to cope intelligently.
with shitlensky their sad puppet.
The 'puppet' word is either a baseless insult, or a bit of propoganda, but not
in correspondence with the reality of an elected leader of a democratic nation.
US does that everywhere:
If Jan smells excrement everywhere he goes, I know what the sourceInteresting to perhaps your kind that you fall back in the excrement here. But really the 2014 agreement was broken.
of that odor is.
Ukraine was taken from Russia by a revolt.
Its probably no use arguing with people who have been indoctrinated from birth by US media.
'US intelligence did note that Russia was about to invade Ukraine'
ha, and some US news[tissue ;-)]paper announced that prematurely, its just a script,
written by the puppeteers.
You have no idea how CIA works.
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:14:31 -0700) it happened >jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in ><kjdp6h93hp9mcnjt09osm214hnh2b17mud@4ax.com>:
I studied America for 6 months. Traveled, researched, subscribed to >>newspapers. I decided it would be Portland or San Francisco, and the
pollen counts favored SF. It's wonderful is you just ignore the
people.
Nice enough place to visit, and of course I still have some good friends >>>there, which makes it reasonably OK in small-to-medium doses. ;)
I'm small-to-medium.
I have traveled US, lived there, worked there,
very familiar with California,
been with the very rich in Malibu and the very poor in Miami,
the gangs in NY, been in Denver, Atlanta, Portland, east coast Atlantic City, up north to Canadian
border hiking, living in the wild, probably knew more about the US than
most hillbillies...
Been with the blacks picking fruits to make some money, been in hightech making some money,
been thrown in jail with some Mexicans close to El Paso ...
The works.
I have nothing against 'merrica , or its people. But the way it makes wars.
CIA asked me and I pissed somebody of to hysteria when I refused and told everybody he asked me
What a place, they should have known me better :-)
What an adventure in retrospect!
Different from 'East of Eden' I did read in school once.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_of_Eden_(novel)
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 06:29:21 GMT, Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:14:31 -0700) it happened jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in <kjdp6h93hp9mcnjt0...@4ax.com>:
The US was traditionally isolationist, but was dragged reluctantly into two european wars and forced to defend a bunch of the planet against various genocidal regimes. Not over yet.
CIA asked me and I pissed somebody of to hysteria when I refused and told everybody he asked me
What a place, they should have known me better :-)
I was recruited too. Declined.
What an adventure in retrospect!Yeah, life is cool.
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 06:29:21 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:14:31 -0700) it happened >>jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in >><kjdp6h93hp9mcnjt09osm214hnh2b17mud@4ax.com>:
I studied America for 6 months. Traveled, researched, subscribed to >>>newspapers. I decided it would be Portland or San Francisco, and the >>>pollen counts favored SF. It's wonderful is you just ignore the
people.
Nice enough place to visit, and of course I still have some good friends >>>>there, which makes it reasonably OK in small-to-medium doses. ;)
I'm small-to-medium.
I have traveled US, lived there, worked there,
very familiar with California,
Ca is 900 miles long, 164,000 square miles. It's all sorts of things.
been with the very rich in Malibu and the very poor in Miami,
the gangs in NY, been in Denver, Atlanta, Portland, east coast Atlantic City, up north to Canadian
border hiking, living in the wild, probably knew more about the US than >>most hillbillies...
Been with the blacks picking fruits to make some money, been in hightech making some money,
been thrown in jail with some Mexicans close to El Paso ...
The works.
A criminal! I should have known!
I have nothing against 'merrica , or its people. But the way it makes wars.
The US was traditionally isolationist, but was dragged reluctantly
into two european wars and forced to defend a bunch of the planet
against various genocidal regimes. Not over yet.
CIA asked me and I pissed somebody of to hysteria when I refused and told everybody he asked me
What a place, they should have known me better :-)
I was recruited too. Declined.
What an adventure in retrospect!
Yeah, life is cool.
Different from 'East of Eden' I did read in school once.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_of_Eden_(novel)
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:36:37 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com>
wrote:
On 4/29/2022 20:43, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:14:43 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:02:25 -0700) it happened John Larkin >>>> <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
<ve6o6hp5q5bet379q1lt5u53v5t2gasq4n@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:49:42 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:33:45 -0700) it happened
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<j31o6hhsnroa0mm1bgqja8osaamn55luhs@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:46:18 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:26:11 -0700) it happened
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<iatn6hlijku89m4aoo1hvanqlfc28im5c7@4ax.com>:
Russia has one insane person in charge. Millions will die.
Well, that could be you.
Unikely. The deaths will be from disease and starvation in poor
countries. They are already suffering from covid lockdown side
effects.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01022-x
The war ByeThen provoked in Ukraine
How did he do that?
Did the US and Ukraine attack Russia?
By breaking the 2014 peace deal by stuffing more weapons directly on the Russian border
supporting Ukraine in making Donbas its own, the usual CIA shit
with shitlensky their sad puppet.
US does that everywhere: sanctions, Cuba, Venezuela, steal their money >>>> break deals (Iran), force injustice (International court in the Hague here >>>> should now sue Russia for war crimes, but Bushman threatened to invade here when it
wanted to sue US soldiers for war crimes.
I was just reading this:
https://www.rt.com/russia/554720-china-us-goals-ukraine/
that site has the views you should also check, not only what ByeThen and his puppet press spews at you.
Putin has pounded Ukrainian cities to rubble. And created millions of
refugees. And damaged the food supply to millions in other countries.
Any you blame the US?
What do you expect of someone following Russian media.
You won't believe the sort of utter nonsense they pour all the time
and yes, there are people who do believe it - not because it is not
laughable, it is of course, but because there are people wanting to
believe it out of hatred to the US, EU etc.
Why do so many people hate the US?
Maybe it's the chinese proverb: If you save someone's life, they will
hate you forever.
A lot of USians hate California. They fear that it's as wonderful as
the rumors suggest. It is.
The US was traditionally isolationist, but was dragged reluctantly
into two european wars and forced to defend a bunch of the planet
against various genocidal regimes. Not over yet.
Hah! I thought he meant Hewlet-Packard...(I really did).
I do think in Watts when it comes to power obviously, like
pretty much all of us, but when it comes to car/engine power
I think horse powers...
Oh, I understand it, but _I_ would write Gsamples/s, Msamples/s,
ksamples/s, etc. I'm OK with 'S' for 'samples' if the context
makes it unambiguous
HP should be stamped out altogether. Use kW.
There was an episode of The Amp Hour a while back, interviewing a guy
doings ASICs. He did over 50 designs per year, one guy
I can make a thousand such "new parts" per month, all better than anything else and several times cheaper than existing best parts. The only problem is that those "new parts" don't really exist but who cares?
Sergey Kubushyn wrote:
I can make a thousand such "new parts" per month, all better than anything >> else and several times cheaper than existing best parts. The only problem is >> that those "new parts" don't really exist but who cares?
I care. Patiently waiting for INA296.
Best regards, Piotr
Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
Hah! I thought he meant Hewlet-Packard...(I really did).
I do think in Watts when it comes to power obviously, like
pretty much all of us, but when it comes to car/engine power
I think horse powers...
Gasoline consumption should properly be expressed in square meters.
On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 4:04:36 PM UTC-4, Piotr Wyderski wrote:write. So rounding off, I shoot to get 700 kJ/km or about 1100 kJ/mi if you must use miles. But no matter how I calculate the consumption, I still pay for electricity by the kWh which is 3.6 MJ.
Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
Hah! I thought he meant Hewlet-Packard...(I really did).
I do think in Watts when it comes to power obviously, like
pretty much all of us, but when it comes to car/engine power
I think horse powers...
Gasoline consumption should properly be expressed in square meters.
And electron consumption? Don't tell me, N. Joule is the unit of work, consumption is J per meter where a joule is N·m, so J/m is just N.
Did I do that right?
It always bugs me that they use kWh for BEVs as it is a bastard unit. Converting to J/m uses a multiplier of 2.24, so at 300 Wh/mi you get 671 J/m or N. Not a bad unit and it becomes 671 kJ/km (still N) which is still workable if a bit awkward to
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:36:37 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <d...@tgi-sci.com>
wrote:
On 4/29/2022 20:43, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:14:43 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:02:25 -0700) it happened John Larkin >>> <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
<ve6o6hp5q5bet379q...@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:49:42 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:33:45 -0700) it happened
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<j31o6hhsnroa0mm1b...@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:46:18 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:26:11 -0700) it happened
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<iatn6hlijku89m4ao...@4ax.com>:
Russia has one insane person in charge. Millions will die.
Well, that could be you.
Unikely. The deaths will be from disease and starvation in poor
countries. They are already suffering from covid lockdown side
effects.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01022-x
The war ByeThen provoked in Ukraine
How did he do that?
Did the US and Ukraine attack Russia?
By breaking the 2014 peace deal by stuffing more weapons directly on the Russian border
supporting Ukraine in making Donbas its own, the usual CIA shit
with shitlensky their sad puppet.
US does that everywhere: sanctions, Cuba, Venezuela, steal their money >>> break deals (Iran), force injustice (International court in the Hague here
should now sue Russia for war crimes, but Bushman threatened to invade here when it
wanted to sue US soldiers for war crimes.
I was just reading this:
https://www.rt.com/russia/554720-china-us-goals-ukraine/
that site has the views you should also check, not only what ByeThen and his puppet press spews at you.
Putin has pounded Ukrainian cities to rubble. And created millions of
refugees. And damaged the food supply to millions in other countries.
Any you blame the US?
What do you expect of someone following Russian media.Why do so many people hate the US?
You won't believe the sort of utter nonsense they pour all the time
and yes, there are people who do believe it - not because it is not >laughable, it is of course, but because there are people wanting to
believe it out of hatred to the US, EU etc.
Maybe it's the chinese proverb: If you save someone's life, they will
hate you forever.
A lot of USians hate California. They fear that it's as wonderful as
the rumors suggest. It is.
--
If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts,
but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties. Francis Bacon
On 04/30/2022 08:26 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
The US was traditionally isolationist, but was dragged reluctantly"From the Halls of Montezuma
into two european wars and forced to defend a bunch of the planet
against various genocidal regimes. Not over yet.
To the shores of Tripoli;
We fight our country's battles
In the air, on land, and sea;"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marines'_Hymn#Lyrics
The Tripoli line dates to 1805, Montezuma to 1847.
Jefferson sent 3 frigates of the US Navy to the Mediterranean in 1801 to protect US merchant ships. The decision was of doubtful
constitutionality and resulted in the First Barbary War.
The Mexican-American War was a result of the US annexing Texas, a part... well, CLAIMED by Mexico, the locals had revolted beforehand,
of Mexico.
Mexico, after achieving independence, unwisely allowed US
citizens to settle in the area as long as they obeyed the law and
converted to Catholicism. They did neither and became a breakaway
province which the US scooped up under 'manifest destiny'.
Things were relatively quiet after the US tried to destroy itself mid-century. By 1898 it had recovered enough to go to war with Spain
over a falsified event.
Wilson was elected on the slogan 'He Kept Us Out of War'. Not for very
long. Supposedly a neutral country the US was supplying war materiel to Britain. When the Germans sank the Lusitania, which was carrying
munitions, it was a convenient casus belli. There was no reluctance.
On 04/30/2022 08:26 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
The US was traditionally isolationist, but was dragged reluctantly
into two european wars and forced to defend a bunch of the planet
against various genocidal regimes. Not over yet.
"From the Halls of Montezuma
To the shores of Tripoli;
We fight our country's battles
In the air, on land, and sea;"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marines'_Hymn#Lyrics
The Tripoli line dates to 1805, Montezuma to 1847.
Jefferson sent 3 frigates of the US Navy to the Mediterranean in 1801 to >protect US merchant ships. The decision was of doubtful
constitutionality and resulted in the First Barbary War.
The Mexican-American War was a result of the US annexing Texas, a part
of Mexico. Mexico, after achieving independence, unwisely allowed US
citizens to settle in the area as long as they obeyed the law and
converted to Catholicism. They did neither and became a breakaway
province which the US scooped up under 'manifest destiny'.
Mexico, after achieving independence, unwisely allowed US... and because of principles, like freedom of religion
citizens to settle in the area as long as they obeyed the law and
converted to Catholicism. They did neither and became a breakaway
province which the US scooped up under 'manifest destiny'.
On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 12:26:49 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:36:37 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <d...@tgi-sci.com>
wrote:
On 4/29/2022 20:43, John Larkin wrote:Why do so many people hate the US?
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:14:43 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:02:25 -0700) it happened John Larkin >> >>> <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
<ve6o6hp5q5bet379q...@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:49:42 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:33:45 -0700) it happened
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<j31o6hhsnroa0mm1b...@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:46:18 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:26:11 -0700) it happened
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<iatn6hlijku89m4ao...@4ax.com>:
Russia has one insane person in charge. Millions will die.
Well, that could be you.
Unikely. The deaths will be from disease and starvation in poor
countries. They are already suffering from covid lockdown side
effects.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01022-x
The war ByeThen provoked in Ukraine
How did he do that?
Did the US and Ukraine attack Russia?
By breaking the 2014 peace deal by stuffing more weapons directly on the Russian border
supporting Ukraine in making Donbas its own, the usual CIA shit
with shitlensky their sad puppet.
US does that everywhere: sanctions, Cuba, Venezuela, steal their money >> >>> break deals (Iran), force injustice (International court in the Hague here
should now sue Russia for war crimes, but Bushman threatened to invade here when it
wanted to sue US soldiers for war crimes.
I was just reading this:
https://www.rt.com/russia/554720-china-us-goals-ukraine/
that site has the views you should also check, not only what ByeThen and his puppet press spews at you.
Putin has pounded Ukrainian cities to rubble. And created millions of
refugees. And damaged the food supply to millions in other countries.
Any you blame the US?
What do you expect of someone following Russian media.
You won't believe the sort of utter nonsense they pour all the time
and yes, there are people who do believe it - not because it is not
laughable, it is of course, but because there are people wanting to
believe it out of hatred to the US, EU etc.
Maybe it's the chinese proverb: If you save someone's life, they will
hate you forever.
A lot of USians hate California. They fear that it's as wonderful as
the rumors suggest. It is.
--
If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts,
but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties. >> Francis Bacon
Then why are people (and companies) leaving CA? >https://taxfoundation.org/state-population-change-2021/#:~:text=Whereas%20the%20District%20of%20Columbia's,gaining%203.4%20percent%2C%20while%20Utah
The event (sinking of a battleship) wasn't falsified, it was investigated five or six times, with mixed conclusions. Probably it was a mistake, amplified by hysterical press reporting. Falsified implies knowing assertions of a non-fact.
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:58:29 -0600, rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
wrote:
On 04/30/2022 08:26 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
The US was traditionally isolationist, but was dragged reluctantly
into two european wars and forced to defend a bunch of the planet
against various genocidal regimes. Not over yet.
"From the Halls of Montezuma
To the shores of Tripoli;
We fight our country's battles
In the air, on land, and sea;"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marines'_Hymn#Lyrics
That's their job. They are pretty good at it.
The Tripoli line dates to 1805, Montezuma to 1847.
Jefferson sent 3 frigates of the US Navy to the Mediterranean in 1801 to
protect US merchant ships. The decision was of doubtful
constitutionality and resulted in the First Barbary War.
Some folks have a tradition of piracy. You can't just sue them.
Check youtube for Somali Pirates.
The Mexican-American War was a result of the US annexing Texas, a part
of Mexico. Mexico, after achieving independence, unwisely allowed US
citizens to settle in the area as long as they obeyed the law and
converted to Catholicism. They did neither and became a breakaway
province which the US scooped up under 'manifest destiny'.
Mexico didn't "own" Texas or the Texans. And Texas is now a much
better place than Mexico.
On 04/30/2022 07:12 PM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:58:29 -0600, rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
wrote:
On 04/30/2022 08:26 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
The US was traditionally isolationist, but was dragged reluctantly
into two european wars and forced to defend a bunch of the planet
against various genocidal regimes. Not over yet.
"From the Halls of Montezuma
To the shores of Tripoli;
We fight our country's battles
In the air, on land, and sea;"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marines'_Hymn#Lyrics
That's their job. They are pretty good at it.
The Tripoli line dates to 1805, Montezuma to 1847.
Jefferson sent 3 frigates of the US Navy to the Mediterranean in 1801 to >>> protect US merchant ships. The decision was of doubtful
constitutionality and resulted in the First Barbary War.
Some folks have a tradition of piracy. You can't just sue them.
Check youtube for Somali Pirates.
Does an isolationist country think its merchants have some god-given
right to conduct business in the Mediterranean?
On 1/5/22 8:30 am, Ricky wrote:write. So rounding off, I shoot to get 700 kJ/km or about 1100 kJ/mi if you must use miles. But no matter how I calculate the consumption, I still pay for electricity by the kWh which is 3.6 MJ.
On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 4:04:36 PM UTC-4, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
Hah! I thought he meant Hewlet-Packard...(I really did).
I do think in Watts when it comes to power obviously, like
pretty much all of us, but when it comes to car/engine power
I think horse powers...
Gasoline consumption should properly be expressed in square meters.
And electron consumption? Don't tell me, N. Joule is the unit of work, consumption is J per meter where a joule is N·m, so J/m is just N.
Did I do that right?
It always bugs me that they use kWh for BEVs as it is a bastard unit. Converting to J/m uses a multiplier of 2.24, so at 300 Wh/mi you get 671 J/m or N. Not a bad unit and it becomes 671 kJ/km (still N) which is still workable if a bit awkward to
E-bike advertisements are the worst! Batteries in AH, or V, anything but
WHr or kJ. Motors specified in Whr... sigh.
On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 12:26:49 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:36:37 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <d...@tgi-sci.com> wrote:
On 4/29/2022 20:43, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:14:43 GMT, Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:02:25 -0700) it happened John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
<ve6o6hp5q5bet379q...@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:49:42 GMT, Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:33:45 -0700) it happened jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in <j31o6hhsnroa0mm1b...@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:46:18 GMT, Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:26:11 -0700) it happened jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in <iatn6hlijku89m4ao...@4ax.com>:
A lot of USians hate California. They fear that it's as wonderful as the rumors suggest. It is.
Then why are people (and companies) leaving CA? https://taxfoundation.org/state-population-change-2021/#:~:text=Whereas%20the%20District%20of%20Columbia's,gaining%203.4%20percent%2C%20while%20Utah
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 20:12:50 -0600, rbowman <bow...@montana.com>
wrote:
On 04/30/2022 07:12 PM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:58:29 -0600, rbowman <bow...@montana.com>
wrote:
On 04/30/2022 08:26 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
The US was traditionally isolationist, but was dragged reluctantly
into two european wars and forced to defend a bunch of the planet
against various genocidal regimes. Not over yet.
"From the Halls of Montezuma
To the shores of Tripoli;
We fight our country's battles
In the air, on land, and sea;"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marines'_Hymn#Lyrics
That's their job. They are pretty good at it.
The Tripoli line dates to 1805, Montezuma to 1847.
Jefferson sent 3 frigates of the US Navy to the Mediterranean in 1801 to >>> protect US merchant ships. The decision was of doubtful
constitutionality and resulted in the First Barbary War.
Some folks have a tradition of piracy. You can't just sue them.
Check youtube for Somali Pirates.
Does an isolationist country think its merchants have some god-givenWho owns the ocean?
right to conduct business in the Mediterranean?
On 04/30/2022 05:56 PM, whit3rd wrote:
[Texas] became a breakaway... and because of principles, like freedom of religion
province which the US scooped up under 'manifest destiny'.
How about principles like chattel slavery?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Three_Hundred
So you go to a colony in a foreign country where slavery is illegal ...
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 17:09:31 -0700 (PDT), Flyguy
<soar2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 12:26:49 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:36:37 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <d...@tgi-sci.com>
wrote:
On 4/29/2022 20:43, John Larkin wrote:Why do so many people hate the US?
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:14:43 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:02:25 -0700) it happened John Larkin
<jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
<ve6o6hp5q5bet379q...@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:49:42 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:33:45 -0700) it happened
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<j31o6hhsnroa0mm1b...@4ax.com>:
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:46:18 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 07:26:11 -0700) it happened
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
<iatn6hlijku89m4ao...@4ax.com>:
Russia has one insane person in charge. Millions will die.
Well, that could be you.
Unikely. The deaths will be from disease and starvation in poor
countries. They are already suffering from covid lockdown side
effects.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01022-x
The war ByeThen provoked in Ukraine
How did he do that?
Did the US and Ukraine attack Russia?
By breaking the 2014 peace deal by stuffing more weapons directly on the Russian border
supporting Ukraine in making Donbas its own, the usual CIA shit
with shitlensky their sad puppet.
US does that everywhere: sanctions, Cuba, Venezuela, steal their money
break deals (Iran), force injustice (International court in the Hague here
should now sue Russia for war crimes, but Bushman threatened to invade here when it
wanted to sue US soldiers for war crimes.
I was just reading this:
https://www.rt.com/russia/554720-china-us-goals-ukraine/
that site has the views you should also check, not only what ByeThen and his puppet press spews at you.
Putin has pounded Ukrainian cities to rubble. And created millions of >> >> refugees. And damaged the food supply to millions in other countries. >> >>
Any you blame the US?
What do you expect of someone following Russian media.
You won't believe the sort of utter nonsense they pour all the time
and yes, there are people who do believe it - not because it is not
laughable, it is of course, but because there are people wanting to
believe it out of hatred to the US, EU etc.
Maybe it's the chinese proverb: If you save someone's life, they will
hate you forever.
A lot of USians hate California. They fear that it's as wonderful as
the rumors suggest. It is.
--
If a man will begin with certainties, he shall end with doubts,
but if he will be content to begin with doubts he shall end in certainties.
Francis Bacon
Then why are people (and companies) leaving CA? >https://taxfoundation.org/state-population-change-2021/#:~:text=Whereas%20the%20District%20of%20Columbia's,gaining%203.4%20percent%2C%20while%20UtahCA -0.8%. NY -1.8. DC -2.8.
Companies go where they can make more profit, or lose business to competitors in cheaper places. Texas, China, Mexico, Ireland.
Some people find California too expensive, or follow the jobs. That's
their choice. It is expensive, but people always select what they are willing to pay for. The cost of living is low in Alabama, so some
people move there.
My nephew is staying with us for a while. He just moved here from
Madison and found a very nice affordable apartment in a few days, in
San Mateo. I was kind of surprised. I think the work-from-home thing
has taken some of the pressure off housing costs.
Where do you live?
--
Anybody can count to one.
- Robert Widlar
On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 10:30:57 PM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 20:12:50 -0600, rbowman <bow...@montana.com>
wrote:
On 04/30/2022 07:12 PM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:Who owns the ocean?
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:58:29 -0600, rbowman <bow...@montana.com>
wrote:
On 04/30/2022 08:26 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
The US was traditionally isolationist, but was dragged reluctantly >>>>>> into two european wars and forced to defend a bunch of the planet
against various genocidal regimes. Not over yet.
"From the Halls of Montezuma
To the shores of Tripoli;
We fight our country's battles
In the air, on land, and sea;"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marines'_Hymn#Lyrics
That's their job. They are pretty good at it.
The Tripoli line dates to 1805, Montezuma to 1847.
Jefferson sent 3 frigates of the US Navy to the Mediterranean in 1801 to >>>>> protect US merchant ships. The decision was of doubtful
constitutionality and resulted in the First Barbary War.
Some folks have a tradition of piracy. You can't just sue them.
Check youtube for Somali Pirates.
Does an isolationist country think its merchants have some god-given
right to conduct business in the Mediterranean?
Whoever has the biggest guns. Duh!
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 20:12:50 -0600, rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
wrote:
On 04/30/2022 07:12 PM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 12:58:29 -0600, rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
wrote:
On 04/30/2022 08:26 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
The US was traditionally isolationist, but was dragged reluctantly
into two european wars and forced to defend a bunch of the planet
against various genocidal regimes. Not over yet.
"From the Halls of Montezuma
To the shores of Tripoli;
We fight our country's battles
In the air, on land, and sea;"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marines'_Hymn#Lyrics
That's their job. They are pretty good at it.
The Tripoli line dates to 1805, Montezuma to 1847.
Jefferson sent 3 frigates of the US Navy to the Mediterranean in 1801 to >>>> protect US merchant ships. The decision was of doubtful
constitutionality and resulted in the First Barbary War.
Some folks have a tradition of piracy. You can't just sue them.
Check youtube for Somali Pirates.
Does an isolationist country think its merchants have some god-given
right to conduct business in the Mediterranean?
Who owns the ocean?
Jeroen Belleman wrote:
Oh, I understand it, but _I_ would write Gsamples/s, Msamples/s,
ksamples/s, etc. I'm OK with 'S' for 'samples' if the context
makes it unambiguous
When one deals with ADC/DAC, the "samples" is implied, so why bother
writing that? It's s^-1 or Hz if you wish. Heck, we could even use Bq to
make the number of sampling events per second look distinct from what >otherwise would suggest a clock line. :->
On 04/30/2022 08:30 PM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 20:12:50 -0600, rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
wrote:
Some folks have a tradition of piracy. You can't just sue them.
Britannia thought it did. Whatever the rationale it was the firstCheck youtube for Somali Pirates.
Does an isolationist country think its merchants have some god-given
right to conduct business in the Mediterranean?
Who owns the ocean?
instance of the US Navy and Marines operating a long way from home. I've never been able to ferret out why US merchant vessels were there in the
first place. Hopefully they weren't buying slaves at the North African markets.
Am 01.05.22 um 07:26 schrieb rbowman:
On 04/30/2022 08:30 PM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 20:12:50 -0600, rbowman <bowman@montana.com>
wrote:
Some folks have a tradition of piracy. You can't just sue them.
It's a cultural characteristic. You've got to respect this,
and don't you dare to commit cultural appropriation!
Britannia thought it did. Whatever the rationale it was the firstCheck youtube for Somali Pirates.
Does an isolationist country think its merchants have some god-given
right to conduct business in the Mediterranean?
Who owns the ocean?
instance of the US Navy and Marines operating a long way from home. I've
never been able to ferret out why US merchant vessels were there in the
first place. Hopefully they weren't buying slaves at the North African
markets.
No, it was the other way around.
Slaves FOR the North African markets.
Piratery in the Mediterranian was a big thing,
including raids to the southern French and Italian shores.
Blondes preferred. They even sacked an entire village on
Iceland. That used to be a core competence of the Vikings.
The Corsairs were the offspring of the Arabs who had occupied
Spain for > 400 Years. They needed a new finance concept, badly.
Or that the American slave biz worked so smoothly because
the African tribes were used to sell their fellow African
tribes. So there wasn't much slave hunting involved, just
transport capacity.
But, of course, it is politically incorrect to mention that.
Gerhard
On a sunny day (Sat, 30 Apr 2022 22:01:21 +0200) it happened Piotr Wyderski <bom...@protonmail.com> wrote in <t4k4it$21cqo$1...@portraits.wsisiz.edu.pl>: >Jeroen Belleman wrote:
Oh, I understand it, but _I_ would write Gsamples/s, Msamples/s,
ksamples/s, etc. I'm OK with 'S' for 'samples' if the context
makes it unambiguous
When one deals with ADC/DAC, the "samples" is implied, so why bother >writing that? It's s^-1 or Hz if you wish. Heck, we could even use Bq to >make the number of sampling events per second look distinct from what >otherwise would suggest a clock line. :->It all depends, you asume 'experts' know it all
I do remember a US spacecraft crashing on Mars as for the insertion burn they used the wrong units
http://edition.cnn.com/TECH/space/9909/30/mars.metric.02/#:~:text=(CNN)%20%2D%2D%20NASA%20lost%20a,a%20review%20finding%20released%20Thursday.
Slavery was universal throughout recorded history so certainly before
that. It's not remarkable that the US and England participated in
slavery. What's remarkable is that they ended it.
On 05/01/2022 08:25 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
Slavery was universal throughout recorded history so certainly before
that. It's not remarkable that the US and England participated in
slavery. What's remarkable is that they ended it.
The Industrial Revolution made wage slaves a much more attractive >proposition. You didn't have to feed, clothe, or doctor them, and you
could fire them when you didn't need them anymore.
Ricky wrote:
And electron consumption? Don't tell me, N. Joule is the unit of work, consumption is J per meter where a joule is N·m, so J/m is just N.
If dimensional analysis says it is newton, then... it is newton, whether you like it or not.
Best regards, Piotr
And electron consumption? Don't tell me, N. Joule is the unit of work, consumption is J per meter where a joule is N·m, so J/m is just N.
On 04/30/2022 08:30 PM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:[about the Barbaby War]
Who owns the ocean?
Britannia thought it did. Whatever the rationale it was the first
instance of the US Navy and Marines operating a long way from home. I've never been able to ferret out why US merchant vessels were there in the
first place. Hopefully they weren't buying slaves at the North African markets.
It makes sense, no? It's just how hard it needs to be pushed to
keep it going.
On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 7:39:37 PM UTC-4, Clifford Heath wrote:write. So rounding off, I shoot to get 700 kJ/km or about 1100 kJ/mi if you must use miles. But no matter how I calculate the consumption, I still pay for electricity by the kWh which is 3.6 MJ.
On 1/5/22 8:30 am, Ricky wrote:
On Saturday, April 30, 2022 at 4:04:36 PM UTC-4, Piotr Wyderski wrote:
Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
Hah! I thought he meant Hewlet-Packard...(I really did).
I do think in Watts when it comes to power obviously, like
pretty much all of us, but when it comes to car/engine power
I think horse powers...
Gasoline consumption should properly be expressed in square meters.
And electron consumption? Don't tell me, N. Joule is the unit of work, consumption is J per meter where a joule is N·m, so J/m is just N.
Did I do that right?
It always bugs me that they use kWh for BEVs as it is a bastard unit. Converting to J/m uses a multiplier of 2.24, so at 300 Wh/mi you get 671 J/m or N. Not a bad unit and it becomes 671 kJ/km (still N) which is still workable if a bit awkward to
E-bike advertisements are the worst! Batteries in AH, or V, anything but
WHr or kJ. Motors specified in Whr... sigh.
I missed something. How can a motor be specified in Wh? Watts, yes, but watt-hours? That makes no sense.
Exactly my point. The people writing these advertisements are not
physicists and do not understand units.
Jeroen Belleman wrote:
It makes sense, no? It's just how hard it needs to be pushed toIn the case of fuel consumption it is simply the cross-sectional area of
keep it going.
the imaginary stream of fuel that runs along the moving vehicle. The
bigger the consumption, the bigger the pipe. Very picturesque and
intuitive IMO.
But it DID work, and its reports through President Biden gave warning that Russian assault
was imminent. That's a good thing.
Did you have a credible source elsewhere that told of the recent invasion in advance?
On Sun, 1 May 2022 12:26:01 -0600, rbowman <bow...@montana.com> wrote:
On 05/01/2022 08:25 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
Slavery was universal throughout recorded history so certainly before
that. It's not remarkable that the US and England participated in
slavery. What's remarkable is that they ended it.
The Industrial Revolution made wage slaves a much more attractive >proposition. You didn't have to feed, clothe, or doctor them, and you >could fire them when you didn't need them anymore.
The "wage slaves" got heated homes, cars, refrigerators, electric
lights, good and reliable food, literacy, affordable clothing, the
right to vote for their government.
They could quit any time if someone made them a better offer. They
could elect to stay in the countryside and struggle to grow enough
food to get their families through the winter. They could watch their
kids die young if they didn't want to be exploited.
The industrial revolution made the average citizen far more productive and far better off than any population had ever been.
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:43:44 -0700) it happened John Larkin ><jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in ><eq8o6htehhqt03esl729sjoot12p127sk9@4ax.com>:
Putin has pounded Ukrainian cities to rubble. And created millions of >>refugees. And damaged the food supply to millions in other countries.
That is is what you get for your interference.
Any you blame the US?
Of course :-)
Was not that trying to present itself as world police?
Oh wait defund the police
US milli-tary Destructing Complex NEEDS war
so after Afghanistan (where they left billions of their war tools)
they new do the Europe thing again.
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 06:13:41 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:43:44 -0700) it happened John Larkin >><jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in >><eq8o6htehhqt03esl729sjoot12p127sk9@4ax.com>:
Putin has pounded Ukrainian cities to rubble. And created millions of >>>refugees. And damaged the food supply to millions in other countries.
That is is what you get for your interference.
Putin is shelling cities and slaughtering possibly millions, and
setting his people back decades, and it's our fault?
Any you blame the US?
Of course :-)
Was not that trying to present itself as world police?
No. Certainly not in Ukreaine.
Oh wait defund the police
US milli-tary Destructing Complex NEEDS war
so after Afghanistan (where they left billions of their war tools)
they new do the Europe thing again.
911 upset some people.
On a sunny day (Mon, 02 May 2022 09:40:44 -0700) it happened John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in <k7207ht2jh2kplncf...@4ax.com>:
911 upset some people.
What US did in Iraq (false 'weapons of mass destruction' claim) -> total destruction
use depleted Uranium ammo,
what you did in Afghanistan (targeting civilians with drones),
what you did in Vietnam (Agent Orange), etc etc
Oh and what you did in Japan targeting civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki,
well the list is sooo long.
On 4/28/2022 22:16, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 02:00:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 12:56:42 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
I want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi, >>> home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything.
What we have is a mess. Many cell companies have various spotty
coverage. Ditto cable TV and internet providers....
One uniform microcell mesh system would eliminate all that.
Imagine progress.
It would be nice for things to evolve this way but - and it is a huge
BUT - the standards need to be public. They are anything but at the
moment - the layers above IP and perhaps PPP are completely secret.
On 4/28/2022 22:16, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 02:00:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 12:56:42 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
I want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi, >>>> home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything.
Privacy is over-rated.
That's a laugh; Internet range is out to near Earth orbit, and you want your
utility meters to compete for that against your TV remote control? One network
isn't the answer, any more than one TV channel is the answer.
What we have is a mess. Many cell companies have various spotty
coverage. Ditto cable TV and internet providers. Once people manage to
get an internet provider, they have to install their own cables and
wifi. Wires are strung on poles, sidewalks are dug up, dishes point
everywhere and rust or get blown away. People pay for multiple
services.
One uniform microcell mesh system would eliminate all that.
Imagine progress.
It would be nice for things to evolve this way but - and it is a huge
BUT - the standards need to be public. They are anything but at the
moment - the layers above IP and perhaps PPP are completely secret.
On a sunny day (Mon, 02 May 2022 09:40:44 -0700) it happened John Larkin ><jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in ><k7207ht2jh2kplncf5pmeti83o9hl3g834@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 06:13:41 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:43:44 -0700) it happened John Larkin >>><jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in >>><eq8o6htehhqt03esl729sjoot12p127sk9@4ax.com>:
Putin has pounded Ukrainian cities to rubble. And created millions of >>>>refugees. And damaged the food supply to millions in other countries.
That is is what you get for your interference.
Putin is shelling cities and slaughtering possibly millions, and
setting his people back decades, and it's our fault?
US provoked it, using NATO slaves
its the same old song, make war, make money.
On Mon, 02 May 2022 17:46:03 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
Putin is shelling cities and slaughtering possibly millions, and
setting his people back decades, and it's our fault?
US provoked it, using NATO slaves
its the same old song, make war, make money.
The US has paid to defend europe from the Russians since WWII.
As T said, it's time for them to pay for their own defense.
Am 02.05.22 um 21:46 schrieb John Larkin:
On Mon, 02 May 2022 17:46:03 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
Putin is shelling cities and slaughtering possibly millions, and
setting his people back decades, and it's our fault?
US provoked it, using NATO slaves
its the same old song, make war, make money.
The US has paid to defend europe from the Russians since WWII.
As T said, it's time for them to pay for their own defense.
No, you invested a bit to ensure your share of the prey.
Just the lesser evil.
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 22:43:35 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com>
wrote:
On 4/28/2022 22:16, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 02:00:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 12:56:42 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
I want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi, >>>>> home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything. >>>>>
Privacy is over-rated.
That's a laugh; Internet range is out to near Earth orbit, and you want your
utility meters to compete for that against your TV remote control? One network
isn't the answer, any more than one TV channel is the answer.
What we have is a mess. Many cell companies have various spotty
coverage. Ditto cable TV and internet providers. Once people manage to
get an internet provider, they have to install their own cables and
wifi. Wires are strung on poles, sidewalks are dug up, dishes point
everywhere and rust or get blown away. People pay for multiple
services.
One uniform microcell mesh system would eliminate all that.
Imagine progress.
It would be nice for things to evolve this way but - and it is a huge
BUT - the standards need to be public. They are anything but at the
moment - the layers above IP and perhaps PPP are completely secret.
We have compatible, competitive TV and cell phone and internet
networks. It's not hard.
On Mon, 02 May 2022 17:46:03 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 02 May 2022 09:40:44 -0700) it happened John Larkin ><jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in ><k7207ht2jh2kplncf...@4ax.com>:
On Sat, 30 Apr 2022 06:13:41 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:43:44 -0700) it happened John Larkin >>><jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in >>><eq8o6htehhqt03esl...@4ax.com>:
Putin has pounded Ukrainian cities to rubble. And created millions of >>>>refugees. And damaged the food supply to millions in other countries.
That is is what you get for your interference.
Putin is shelling cities and slaughtering possibly millions, and
setting his people back decades, and it's our fault?
US provoked it, using NATO slavesThe US has paid to defend europe from the Russians since WWII.
its the same old song, make war, make money.
As T said, it's time for them to pay for their own defense.
On Mon, 2 May 2022 22:22:38 +0200, Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de>
wrote:
Am 02.05.22 um 21:46 schrieb John Larkin:
On Mon, 02 May 2022 17:46:03 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
Putin is shelling cities and slaughtering possibly millions, and
setting his people back decades, and it's our fault?
US provoked it, using NATO slaves
its the same old song, make war, make money.
The US has paid to defend europe from the Russians since WWII.
As T said, it's time for them to pay for their own defense.
No, you invested a bit to ensure your share of the prey.
The europeans find excuses to be ungrateful and cheap. We should have
let the Russian Empire grow all the way.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_world
Just the lesser evil.
Take your choice.
We have compatible, competitive TV and cell phone and internet
networks. It's not hard.
Am 02.05.22 um 22:36 schrieb John Larkin:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 22:22:38 +0200, Gerhard Hoffmann <dk4xp@arcor.de>
wrote:
Am 02.05.22 um 21:46 schrieb John Larkin:
On Mon, 02 May 2022 17:46:03 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
Putin is shelling cities and slaughtering possibly millions, and
setting his people back decades, and it's our fault?
US provoked it, using NATO slaves
its the same old song, make war, make money.
The US has paid to defend europe from the Russians since WWII.
As T said, it's time for them to pay for their own defense.
No, you invested a bit to ensure your share of the prey.
The europeans find excuses to be ungrateful and cheap. We should have
let the Russian Empire grow all the way.
There is no such thing as a Russian empire. Russia has a
gross national product the size of Italy, and Italy needed
loans from the EU in the previous years. Plus Russia needs
twice as many people as Italy to reach this rank. Lives
from selling mineral resources / gas, like black Africa.
Just like the "Scheinriese" of the Augsburg puppet box.
The closer you come, the more the giant shrinks.
All that Russia has is some nukes, and with their track
record from the cold war, half of them don't exist and
another quarter is probably defunct, because the money for
keeping them operational trickled into the kleptocracy.
Just note the excellent performance of their tanks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_world
Just the lesser evil.
Take your choice.
My choice is Europe. We WILL grow together.
Number 2 after China in 10 years. Just count the noses.
Gerhard
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 12:49:46 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
We have compatible, competitive TV and cell phone and internet
networks. It's not hard.
TV satellite, TV cable, and TV broadcast are NOT compatible.
Neither is Blu-Ray and DVD completely compatible with region
and hardware-license restrictions. Cell phones interconnect,
but the networks aren't 'compatible' hardwares.
As for internet, YES, that's a compatibility layer for networks. It isn't >generally the one phones, utility meters, and TV broadcast use, though.
On Mon, 2 May 2022 23:25:50 +0200, Gerhard Hoffmann <dk...@arcor.de> wrote: >Am 02.05.22 um 22:36 schrieb John Larkin:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 22:22:38 +0200, Gerhard Hoffmann <dk...@arcor.de> wrote:
Am 02.05.22 um 21:46 schrieb John Larkin:
On Mon, 02 May 2022 17:46:03 GMT, Jan Panteltje <pNaonSt...@yahoo.com> wrote:
There is no such thing as a Russian empire. Russia has a
gross national product the size of Italy, and Italy needed
loans from the EU in the previous years. Plus Russia needs
twice as many people as Italy to reach this rank. Lives
from selling mineral resources / gas, like black Africa.
Just like the "Scheinriese" of the Augsburg puppet box.
The closer you come, the more the giant shrinks.
The Russians have tanks, planes, helicopters, nukes, and a pretty big army. Ukrainian towns are rubble, refugees number millions, and the giant is still hungry.
This is an alphabet war, Latin/English vs Cyrillic. Really, it is.
All that Russia has is some nukes, and with their track
record from the cold war, half of them don't exist and
another quarter is probably defunct, because the money for
keeping them operational trickled into the kleptocracy.
Just note the excellent performance of their tanks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_world
Just the lesser evil.
Take your choice.
My choice is Europe. We WILL grow together.
Russia could be part of Europe. But they'd rather be Russian and poor.
Number 2 after China in 10 years. Just count the noses.
Those noses won't be all traditional European noses.
On Mon, 2 May 2022 15:50:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 12:49:46 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
We have compatible, competitive TV and cell phone and internet
networks. It's not hard.
TV satellite, TV cable, and TV broadcast are NOT compatible.
My TV works with all of them. I can switch any time.
Neither is Blu-Ray and DVD completely compatible with region
and hardware-license restrictions. Cell phones interconnect,
but the networks aren't 'compatible' hardwares.
I can switch cell providers and my Samsung and my wife's iPhone will
keep working. Over the air and wi-fi.
As for internet, YES, that's a compatibility layer for networks. It isn't >>generally the one phones, utility meters, and TV broadcast use, though.
I project that one day not too far off we'll have one wireless network
for everything. It makes too much sense to not do.
On Mon, 2 May 2022 15:50:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 12:49:46 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
We have compatible, competitive TV and cell phone and internet
networks. It's not hard.
TV satellite, TV cable, and TV broadcast are NOT compatible.My TV works with all of them. I can switch any time.
Neither is Blu-Ray and DVD completely compatible with region
and hardware-license restrictions. Cell phones interconnect,
but the networks aren't 'compatible' hardwares.
I can switch cell providers and my Samsung and my wife's iPhone will
keep working. Over the air and wi-fi.
As for internet, YES, that's a compatibility layer for networks. It isn't >generally the one phones, utility meters, and TV broadcast use, though.
I project that one day not too far off we'll have one wireless network
for everything. It makes too much sense to not do.
On a sunny day (Mon, 02 May 2022 16:51:38 -0700) it happened John Larkin ><jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in ><7cr07hp81i2qmgeoef7sj9od6p5ho7fdll@4ax.com>:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 15:50:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 12:49:46 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
We have compatible, competitive TV and cell phone and internet
networks. It's not hard.
TV satellite, TV cable, and TV broadcast are NOT compatible.
My TV works with all of them. I can switch any time.
Neither is Blu-Ray and DVD completely compatible with region
and hardware-license restrictions. Cell phones interconnect,
but the networks aren't 'compatible' hardwares.
I can switch cell providers and my Samsung and my wife's iPhone will
keep working. Over the air and wi-fi.
As for internet, YES, that's a compatibility layer for networks. It isn't >>>generally the one phones, utility meters, and TV broadcast use, though.
I project that one day not too far off we'll have one wireless network
for everything. It makes too much sense to not do.
Make no sense whatsoever.
First there is diversity for security
if your one for all thing is down, nothing works.
Then there are radio frequencies like used by aircraft, ships,
and other services that have totally different requirements.
Use the best system for the required purpose and frequency.
Make sure there is redundancy.
You are just dreaming. Mindless babble, no in depth knowledge, no experience.
On Tue, 03 May 2022 05:40:41 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 02 May 2022 16:51:38 -0700) it happened John Larkin >><jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in >><7cr07hp81i2qmgeoef7sj9od6p5ho7fdll@4ax.com>:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 15:50:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> >>>wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 12:49:46 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
We have compatible, competitive TV and cell phone and internet
networks. It's not hard.
TV satellite, TV cable, and TV broadcast are NOT compatible.
My TV works with all of them. I can switch any time.
Neither is Blu-Ray and DVD completely compatible with region
and hardware-license restrictions. Cell phones interconnect,
but the networks aren't 'compatible' hardwares.
I can switch cell providers and my Samsung and my wife's iPhone will
keep working. Over the air and wi-fi.
As for internet, YES, that's a compatibility layer for networks. It isn't >>>>generally the one phones, utility meters, and TV broadcast use, though.
I project that one day not too far off we'll have one wireless network >>>for everything. It makes too much sense to not do.
Make no sense whatsoever.
First there is diversity for security
if your one for all thing is down, nothing works.
A microcell mesh can have redundancy at all levels. It would be better
than a mess of various services.
Then there are radio frequencies like used by aircraft, ships,
and other services that have totally different requirements.
The RF spectrum is chopped up amongst many services. A common band
would be much more efficient.
Use the best system for the required purpose and frequency.
Make sure there is redundancy.
You are just dreaming. Mindless babble, no in depth knowledge, no experience.
Why do so many people refuse to imagine progress? 100 years ago you
would have refused to believe that there could ever be TVs or
computers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6G_(network)
On a sunny day (Tue, 03 May 2022 07:16:15 -0700) it happened >jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in ><mrd27h99ochpb3ougpkko45esjg17f38bi@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 03 May 2022 05:40:41 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 02 May 2022 16:51:38 -0700) it happened John Larkin >>><jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in >>><7cr07hp81i2qmgeoef7sj9od6p5ho7fdll@4ax.com>:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 15:50:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> >>>>wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 12:49:46 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
We have compatible, competitive TV and cell phone and internet
networks. It's not hard.
TV satellite, TV cable, and TV broadcast are NOT compatible.
My TV works with all of them. I can switch any time.
Neither is Blu-Ray and DVD completely compatible with region
and hardware-license restrictions. Cell phones interconnect,
but the networks aren't 'compatible' hardwares.
I can switch cell providers and my Samsung and my wife's iPhone will >>>>keep working. Over the air and wi-fi.
As for internet, YES, that's a compatibility layer for networks. It isn'tI project that one day not too far off we'll have one wireless network >>>>for everything. It makes too much sense to not do.
generally the one phones, utility meters, and TV broadcast use, though. >>>>
Make no sense whatsoever.
First there is diversity for security
if your one for all thing is down, nothing works.
A microcell mesh can have redundancy at all levels. It would be better
than a mess of various services.
Then there are radio frequencies like used by aircraft, ships,
and other services that have totally different requirements.
The RF spectrum is chopped up amongst many services. A common band
would be much more efficient.
Use the best system for the required purpose and frequency.
Make sure there is redundancy.
You are just dreaming. Mindless babble, no in depth knowledge, no experience.
Why do so many people refuse to imagine progress? 100 years ago you
would have refused to believe that there could ever be TVs or
computers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6G_(network)
Strawman
Look dude, if you just wannabe right why not start a twitter account where your devotees can praise your genius while you play with your teddy bear
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 4:51:49 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 15:50:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 12:49:46 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:My TV works with all of them. I can switch any time.
We have compatible, competitive TV and cell phone and internet
networks. It's not hard.
TV satellite, TV cable, and TV broadcast are NOT compatible.
Yeah, but the TV isn't cable-ready, nor satellite-ready, you need a leased >or purchased translation box. You cannot switch without a
proprietary box and some license restrictions.
Neither is Blu-Ray and DVD completely compatible with region
and hardware-license restrictions. Cell phones interconnect,
but the networks aren't 'compatible' hardwares.
I can switch cell providers and my Samsung and my wife's iPhone will
keep working. Over the air and wi-fi.
It was hard (took legislation) to get phones unlocked, but your phones are still unlikely to
support using two SIMs at the same time. Unless software-SIM gets a boost, >it'll never go to three or more. Buying into ONE at a time, that's supported.
As for internet, YES, that's a compatibility layer for networks. It isn't >> >generally the one phones, utility meters, and TV broadcast use, though.
I project that one day not too far off we'll have one wireless network
for everything. It makes too much sense to not do.
If it makes sense, someone will claim they have it. And that someone is
a salesman you might not want to do business with.
On Mon, 2 May 2022 23:53:05 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 4:51:49 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 15:50:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 12:49:46 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:My TV works with all of them. I can switch any time.
We have compatible, competitive TV and cell phone and internet
networks. It's not hard.
TV satellite, TV cable, and TV broadcast are NOT compatible.
Yeah, but the TV isn't cable-ready, nor satellite-ready, you need a leased >> or purchased translation box. You cannot switch without a
proprietary box and some license restrictions.
Neither is Blu-Ray and DVD completely compatible with region
and hardware-license restrictions. Cell phones interconnect,
but the networks aren't 'compatible' hardwares.
I can switch cell providers and my Samsung and my wife's iPhone will
keep working. Over the air and wi-fi.
It was hard (took legislation) to get phones unlocked, but your phones are still unlikely to
support using two SIMs at the same time. Unless software-SIM gets a boost, >> it'll never go to three or more. Buying into ONE at a time, that's supported.
As for internet, YES, that's a compatibility layer for networks. It isn't >>>> generally the one phones, utility meters, and TV broadcast use, though.
I project that one day not too far off we'll have one wireless network
for everything. It makes too much sense to not do.
If it makes sense, someone will claim they have it. And that someone is
a salesman you might not want to do business with.
I think things are possible. Some people insist that things are
impossible. It's more likely that I'm right.
On 5/3/2022 19:58, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 23:53:05 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 4:51:49 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 15:50:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 12:49:46 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:My TV works with all of them. I can switch any time.
We have compatible, competitive TV and cell phone and internet
networks. It's not hard.
TV satellite, TV cable, and TV broadcast are NOT compatible.
Yeah, but the TV isn't cable-ready, nor satellite-ready, you need a leased >>> or purchased translation box. You cannot switch without a
proprietary box and some license restrictions.
Neither is Blu-Ray and DVD completely compatible with region
and hardware-license restrictions. Cell phones interconnect,
but the networks aren't 'compatible' hardwares.
I can switch cell providers and my Samsung and my wife's iPhone will
keep working. Over the air and wi-fi.
It was hard (took legislation) to get phones unlocked, but your phones are still unlikely to
support using two SIMs at the same time. Unless software-SIM gets a boost, >>> it'll never go to three or more. Buying into ONE at a time, that's supported.
As for internet, YES, that's a compatibility layer for networks. It isn't >>>>> generally the one phones, utility meters, and TV broadcast use, though. >>>I project that one day not too far off we'll have one wireless network >>>> for everything. It makes too much sense to not do.
If it makes sense, someone will claim they have it. And that someone is >>> a salesman you might not want to do business with.
I think things are possible. Some people insist that things are
impossible. It's more likely that I'm right.
I don't think humans have the capacity to imagine the impossible.
On 5/3/2022 19:58, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 23:53:05 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 4:51:49 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 15:50:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 12:49:46 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:My TV works with all of them. I can switch any time.
We have compatible, competitive TV and cell phone and internet
networks. It's not hard.
TV satellite, TV cable, and TV broadcast are NOT compatible.
Yeah, but the TVÂ isn't cable-ready, nor satellite-ready, you need a
leased
or purchased translation box. You cannot switch without a
proprietary box and some license restrictions.
Neither is Blu-Ray and DVD completely compatible with region
and hardware-license restrictions. Cell phones interconnect,
but the networks aren't 'compatible' hardwares.
I can switch cell providers and my Samsung and my wife's iPhone will
keep working. Over the air and wi-fi.
It was hard (took legislation) to get phones unlocked, but your
phones are still unlikely to
support using two SIMs at the same time. Unless software-SIM gets a
boost,
it'll never go to three or more. Buying into ONE at a time, that's
supported.
As for internet, YES, that's a compatibility layer for networks. It
isn't
generally the one phones, utility meters, and TV broadcast use,
though.
I project that one day not too far off we'll have one wireless network >>>> for everything. It makes too much sense to not do.
If it makes sense, someone will claim they have it.  And that
someone is
a salesman you might not want to do business with.
I think things are possible. Some people insist that things are
impossible. It's more likely that I'm right.
I don't think humans have the capacity to imagine the impossible.
On Tue, 3 May 2022 21:14:31 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <dp@tgi-sci.com>
wrote:
On 5/3/2022 19:58, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 23:53:05 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 4:51:49 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 15:50:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 12:49:46 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:My TV works with all of them. I can switch any time.
We have compatible, competitive TV and cell phone and internet
networks. It's not hard.
TV satellite, TV cable, and TV broadcast are NOT compatible.
Yeah, but the TV isn't cable-ready, nor satellite-ready, you need a leased
or purchased translation box. You cannot switch without a
proprietary box and some license restrictions.
Neither is Blu-Ray and DVD completely compatible with region
and hardware-license restrictions. Cell phones interconnect,
but the networks aren't 'compatible' hardwares.
I can switch cell providers and my Samsung and my wife's iPhone will >>>>> keep working. Over the air and wi-fi.
It was hard (took legislation) to get phones unlocked, but your phones are still unlikely to
support using two SIMs at the same time. Unless software-SIM gets a boost,
it'll never go to three or more. Buying into ONE at a time, that's supported.
As for internet, YES, that's a compatibility layer for networks. It isn'tI project that one day not too far off we'll have one wireless network >>>>> for everything. It makes too much sense to not do.
generally the one phones, utility meters, and TV broadcast use, though. >>>>
If it makes sense, someone will claim they have it. And that someone is >>>> a salesman you might not want to do business with.
I think things are possible. Some people insist that things are
impossible. It's more likely that I'm right.
I don't think humans have the capacity to imagine the impossible.
But that's a basic part of electronic design, imagining things that
haven't been done, or can't be done.
Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
On 5/3/2022 19:58, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 23:53:05 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 4:51:49 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 15:50:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 12:49:46 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:My TV works with all of them. I can switch any time.
We have compatible, competitive TV and cell phone and internet
networks. It's not hard.
TV satellite, TV cable, and TV broadcast are NOT compatible.
Yeah, but the TVÂ isn't cable-ready, nor satellite-ready, you need a
leased
or purchased translation box. You cannot switch without a
proprietary box and some license restrictions.
Neither is Blu-Ray and DVD completely compatible with region
and hardware-license restrictions. Cell phones interconnect,
but the networks aren't 'compatible' hardwares.
I can switch cell providers and my Samsung and my wife's iPhone will >>>>> keep working. Over the air and wi-fi.
It was hard (took legislation) to get phones unlocked, but your
phones are still unlikely to
support using two SIMs at the same time. Unless software-SIM gets a
boost,
it'll never go to three or more. Buying into ONE at a time, that's
supported.
As for internet, YES, that's a compatibility layer for networks.
It isn't
generally the one phones, utility meters, and TV broadcast use,
though.
I project that one day not too far off we'll have one wireless network >>>>> for everything. It makes too much sense to not do.
If it makes sense, someone will claim they have it.  And that
someone is
a salesman you might not want to do business with.
I think things are possible. Some people insist that things are
impossible. It's more likely that I'm right.
I don't think humans have the capacity to imagine the impossible.
You can't imagine a perpetual motion machine, or a lens that forms an
image hotter than the (thermal) source?
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
On a sunny day (Tue, 03 May 2022 07:16:15 -0700) it happened >jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in ><mrd27h99ochpb3ougpkko45esjg17f38bi@4ax.com>:
On Tue, 03 May 2022 05:40:41 GMT, Jan Panteltje
<pNaonStpealmtje@yahoo.com> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 02 May 2022 16:51:38 -0700) it happened John Larkin >>><jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in >>><7cr07hp81i2qmgeoef7sj9od6p5ho7fdll@4ax.com>:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 15:50:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> >>>>wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 12:49:46 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
We have compatible, competitive TV and cell phone and internet
networks. It's not hard.
TV satellite, TV cable, and TV broadcast are NOT compatible.
My TV works with all of them. I can switch any time.
Neither is Blu-Ray and DVD completely compatible with region
and hardware-license restrictions. Cell phones interconnect,
but the networks aren't 'compatible' hardwares.
I can switch cell providers and my Samsung and my wife's iPhone will >>>>keep working. Over the air and wi-fi.
As for internet, YES, that's a compatibility layer for networks. It isn'tI project that one day not too far off we'll have one wireless network >>>>for everything. It makes too much sense to not do.
generally the one phones, utility meters, and TV broadcast use, though. >>>>
Make no sense whatsoever.
First there is diversity for security
if your one for all thing is down, nothing works.
A microcell mesh can have redundancy at all levels. It would be better
than a mess of various services.
Then there are radio frequencies like used by aircraft, ships,
and other services that have totally different requirements.
The RF spectrum is chopped up amongst many services. A common band
would be much more efficient.
Use the best system for the required purpose and frequency.
Make sure there is redundancy.
You are just dreaming. Mindless babble, no in depth knowledge, no experience.
Why do so many people refuse to imagine progress? 100 years ago you
would have refused to believe that there could ever be TVs or
computers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/6G_(network)
Strawman
Look dude, if you just wannabe right why not start a twitter account where your devotees can praise your genius while you play with your teddy bear
On Mon, 2 May 2022 23:53:05 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 4:51:49 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
I project that one day not too far off we'll have one wireless network
for everything. It makes too much sense to not do.
If it makes sense, someone will claim they have it. And that someone is
a salesman you might not want to do business with.
I think things are possible. Some people insist that things are
impossible. It's more likely that I'm right.
On Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 9:59:06 AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 23:53:05 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 4:51:49 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
I project that one day not too far off we'll have one wireless network
for everything. It makes too much sense to not do.
If it makes sense, someone will claim they have it. And that someone is
a salesman you might not want to do business with.
I think things are possible. Some people insist that things are
impossible. It's more likely that I'm right.
Aha! You said 'likely'; that's not a good sign, when John Larkin gets >statistical. As for me, I'm not eager to let the world have access to
my alarm clock's controls. Short-range access is my best plan.
Global unlimited connection may be possible, but is unworthy of support.
On 5/3/2022 22:49, Phil Hobbs wrote:
Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
On 5/3/2022 19:58, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 23:53:05 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd
<whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 4:51:49 PM UTC-7, John Larkin
wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 15:50:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd
<whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 12:49:46 PM UTC-7, John LarkinMy TV works with all of them. I can switch any time.
wrote:
We have compatible, competitive TV and cell phone and
internet networks. It's not hard.
TV satellite, TV cable, and TV broadcast are NOT
compatible.
Yeah, but the TV isn't cable-ready, nor satellite-ready, you
need a leased or purchased translation box. You cannot
switch without a proprietary box and some license
restrictions.
Neither is Blu-Ray and DVD completely compatible with
region and hardware-license restrictions. Cell phones
interconnect, but the networks aren't 'compatible'
hardwares.
I can switch cell providers and my Samsung and my wife's
iPhone will keep working. Over the air and wi-fi.
It was hard (took legislation) to get phones unlocked, but
your phones are still unlikely to support using two SIMs at
the same time. Unless software-SIM gets a boost, it'll never
go to three or more. Buying into ONE at a time, that's
supported.
As for internet, YES, that's a compatibility layer for
networks. It isn't generally the one phones, utility
meters, and TV broadcast use, though.
I project that one day not too far off we'll have one
wireless network for everything. It makes too much sense to
not do.
If it makes sense, someone will claim they have it. And
that someone is a salesman you might not want to do business
with.
I think things are possible. Some people insist that things
are impossible. It's more likely that I'm right.
I don't think humans have the capacity to imagine the
impossible.
You can't imagine a perpetual motion machine, or a lens that forms
an image hotter than the (thermal) source?
These are impossible only in our realm.
The point is, if we can think of something it is doable, not
necessarily by us or in our reality :).
Why do so many people refuse to imagine progress? 100 years ago you
would have refused to believe that there could ever be TVs or
computers.
On Tue, 3 May 2022 21:14:31 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <d...@tgi-sci.com>
wrote:
On 5/3/2022 19:58, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 23:53:05 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 4:51:49 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 2 May 2022 15:50:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Monday, May 2, 2022 at 12:49:46 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:My TV works with all of them. I can switch any time.
We have compatible, competitive TV and cell phone and internet
networks. It's not hard.
TV satellite, TV cable, and TV broadcast are NOT compatible.
Yeah, but the TV isn't cable-ready, nor satellite-ready, you need a leased
or purchased translation box. You cannot switch without a
proprietary box and some license restrictions.
Neither is Blu-Ray and DVD completely compatible with region
and hardware-license restrictions. Cell phones interconnect,
but the networks aren't 'compatible' hardwares.
I can switch cell providers and my Samsung and my wife's iPhone will >>>> keep working. Over the air and wi-fi.
It was hard (took legislation) to get phones unlocked, but your phones are still unlikely to
support using two SIMs at the same time. Unless software-SIM gets a boost,
it'll never go to three or more. Buying into ONE at a time, that's supported.
As for internet, YES, that's a compatibility layer for networks. It isn'tI project that one day not too far off we'll have one wireless network >>>> for everything. It makes too much sense to not do.
generally the one phones, utility meters, and TV broadcast use, though. >>>
If it makes sense, someone will claim they have it. And that someone is >>> a salesman you might not want to do business with.
I think things are possible. Some people insist that things are
impossible. It's more likely that I'm right.
I don't think humans have the capacity to imagine the impossible.
But that's a basic part of electronic design, imagining things that haven't been done, or can't be done.
Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.
- The Red Queen
On Tue, 3 May 2022 21:14:31 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <d...@tgi-sci.com>
wrote:
I don't think humans have the capacity to imagine the impossible.
But that's a basic part of electronic design, imagining things that
haven't been done, or can't be done.
On Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 11:42:12 AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 3 May 2022 21:14:31 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <d...@tgi-sci.com>
wrote:
I don't think humans have the capacity to imagine the impossible.
But that's a basic part of electronic design, imagining things that
haven't been done, or can't be done.
But neither of those categories is 'impossible'.
There's many uses of imagination, but fewer for imagining impossibilities. >The most important, the reductio ad absurdam proof, is ... not so
important that most people would recognize the phrase.
On Tue, 3 May 2022 20:51:56 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Tuesday, May 3, 2022 at 11:42:12 AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 3 May 2022 21:14:31 +0300, Dimiter_Popoff <d...@tgi-sci.com>
wrote:
I don't think humans have the capacity to imagine the impossible.
But that's a basic part of electronic design, imagining things that
haven't been done, or can't be done.
But neither of those categories is 'impossible'.
There's many uses of imagination, but fewer for imagining impossibilities. >The most important, the reductio ad absurdam proof, is ... not so >important that most people would recognize the phrase.
1. Imagining impossibilities exercizes the imagine muscles.
2. Sometimes a great idea is out in the solution space hiding among impossible ideas. Go poke around out there.
3. Rejecting new ideas is endemic to humanity, for several reasons.
Fight that tendency if you want to design cool stuff.
4. Respect one or two solid conservation principles, but otherwise mock "good engineering practice."
5. Doodle a lot. Paper is cheap.
On 05/03/2022 08:16 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
Why do so many people refuse to imagine progress? 100 years ago you
would have refused to believe that there could ever be TVs or
computers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxDTeoeWZeI
Where the hell is my flying car? My baseline is the 1964 World's Fair. I
was in high school so maybe I was young and naive but there was a
feeling in the air of optimism. There have been plenty of technological >advances but that optimism didn't even make it through the '60s.
On Tue, 3 May 2022 20:16:26 -0600, rbowman <bow...@montana.com> wrote:
On 05/03/2022 08:16 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
Why do so many people refuse to imagine progress? 100 years ago you
would have refused to believe that there could ever be TVs or
computers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxDTeoeWZeI
Where the hell is my flying car? My baseline is the 1964 World's Fair. I >was in high school so maybe I was young and naive but there was aI was at the '64 fair!
feeling in the air of optimism. There have been plenty of technological >advances but that optimism didn't even make it through the '60s.
We got PCs, internet, drones, cell phones, LCD and Oled color TVs, fiberoptics, nanometer ICs, medical advances, SUVs, social media, all
sorts of great-ish stuff.
What the great things have in common is that they were *not*
anticipated at the World's Fair. Futurism ain't what it used to be.
I'm still optimistic. There is plenty of stuff left to invent.
3. Rejecting new ideas is endemic to humanity, for several reasons.
Fight that tendency if you want to design cool stuff.
On Wednesday, May 4, 2022 at 6:15:14 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
3. Rejecting new ideas is endemic to humanity, for several reasons.
Fight that tendency if you want to design cool stuff.
Nonsense.
On Tue, 3 May 2022 20:16:26 -0600, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
On 05/03/2022 08:16 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
Why do so many people refuse to imagine progress? 100 years ago you
would have refused to believe that there could ever be TVs or
computers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxDTeoeWZeI
Where the hell is my flying car? My baseline is the 1964 World's Fair. I
was in high school so maybe I was young and naive but there was a
feeling in the air of optimism. There have been plenty of technological
advances but that optimism didn't even make it through the '60s.
I was at the '64 fair!
We got PCs, internet, drones, cell phones, LCD and Oled color TVs, fiberoptics, nanometer ICs, medical advances, SUVs, social media, all
sorts of great-ish stuff.
What the great things have in common is that they were *not*
anticipated at the World's Fair. Futurism ain't what it used to be.
I'm still optimistic. There is plenty of stuff left to invent.
On 05/04/2022 12:09 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 3 May 2022 20:16:26 -0600, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
On 05/03/2022 08:16 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
Why do so many people refuse to imagine progress? 100 years ago you
would have refused to believe that there could ever be TVs or
computers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxDTeoeWZeI
Where the hell is my flying car? My baseline is the 1964 World's Fair. I >>> was in high school so maybe I was young and naive but there was a
feeling in the air of optimism. There have been plenty of technological
advances but that optimism didn't even make it through the '60s.
I was at the '64 fair!
We got PCs, internet, drones, cell phones, LCD and Oled color TVs,
fiberoptics, nanometer ICs, medical advances, SUVs, social media, all
sorts of great-ish stuff.
What the great things have in common is that they were *not*
anticipated at the World's Fair. Futurism ain't what it used to be.
I'm still optimistic. There is plenty of stuff left to invent.
Oddly one thing I have always remembered was a hands on exhibit in Ma
Bell's pavilion. There were timers connected to a rotary dial and to the
new touch tone keypad so you could see how much faster the future was
going to be. Ma Bell is long gone but their keypad layout lives on.
Trivia: JFK kicked the fair countdown off by keying in '1964'. Not quite >'text 1964 to...'
I'm optimistic in the technical sense, not so much in the societal
sense. That seems to be SSDD, to use Stephen King's acronym which has >nothing to do with solid state drives.
On Tue, 3 May 2022 20:16:26 -0600, rbowman <bow...@montana.com> wrote:
On 05/03/2022 08:16 AM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
Why do so many people refuse to imagine progress? 100 years ago you
would have refused to believe that there could ever be TVs or
computers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxDTeoeWZeI
Where the hell is my flying car? My baseline is the 1964 World's Fair. I >was in high school so maybe I was young and naive but there was aI was at the '64 fair!
feeling in the air of optimism. There have been plenty of technological >advances but that optimism didn't even make it through the '60s.
We got PCs, internet, drones, cell phones, LCD and Oled color TVs, fiberoptics, nanometer ICs, medical advances, SUVs, social media, all
sorts of great-ish stuff.
What the great things have in common is that they were *not*
anticipated at the World's Fair. Futurism ain't what it used to be.
I'm still optimistic. There is plenty of stuff left to invent.
I think there was a Bell demo of using light for communications,
specifically shooting light through a long pipe that used thermal
gradients to keep it confined. This sort of anticipated fiberoptics.
There was a cool monorail sort of ride.
On 05/04/2022 10:41 PM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
I think there was a Bell demo of using light for communications,
specifically shooting light through a long pipe that used thermal
gradients to keep it confined. This sort of anticipated fiberoptics.
The concept had been around for a long time.
https://www.olympus-global.com/technology/museum/endo/?page=technology_museum
Glass tubes were also used to illuminate tight spots. Developing the technology to create bundles of very thin fibers was the trick.
A lot of ideas are like that. The concept of an airplane had to wait for relatively lightweight IC engines to happen.
There was a cool monorail sort of ride.
Now for cool monorails -- in the early 1900's some people were working
on a monorail with gyroscopic stabilization. The big problem was each
car would need a gyroscope.
The idea never took off in the US. Other countries have impressive
systems including maglev designed. Most US monorails are basically
tourist attractions like Seattle, the Disney parks, Jacksonville, and
Las Vegas. Detroit's is much more expensive per passenger mile than buses.
I don't think the people mover at the Detroit airport qualifies as a monorail. It's never been operating when I was there unfortunately. Invariably my connections are between the two furthest apart gates.
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 02:00:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 12:56:42 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
I want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi,
home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything.
Privacy is over-rated.
That's a laugh; Internet range is out to near Earth orbit, and you want your >utility meters to compete for that against your TV remote control? One networkWhat we have is a mess. Many cell companies have various spotty
isn't the answer, any more than one TV channel is the answer.
coverage. Ditto cable TV and internet providers. Once people manage to
get an internet provider, they have to install their own cables and
wifi. Wires are strung on poles, sidewalks are dug up, dishes point everywhere and rust or get blown away. People pay for multiple
services.
One uniform microcell mesh system would eliminate all that.
Imagine progress.
On 4/28/2022 22:16, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 02:00:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 12:56:42 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
I want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi, >>> home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything.
Privacy is over-rated.
That's a laugh; Internet range is out to near Earth orbit, and you want your
utility meters to compete for that against your TV remote control? One network
isn't the answer, any more than one TV channel is the answer.
What we have is a mess. Many cell companies have various spotty
coverage. Ditto cable TV and internet providers. Once people manage to
get an internet provider, they have to install their own cables and
wifi. Wires are strung on poles, sidewalks are dug up, dishes point everywhere and rust or get blown away. People pay for multiple
services.
One uniform microcell mesh system would eliminate all that.
Imagine progress.
It would be nice for things to evolve this way but - and it is a huge
BUT - the standards need to be public. They are anything but at the
moment - the layers above IP and perhaps PPP are completely secret.
Privacy is overrated, as you say
- I'd go a step further and say
privacy will disappear completely before we know, however it has to
disappear for *everyone*, *zero* exceptions.
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 22:18:20 -0700 (PDT), Tabby <tabb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 April 2022 at 21:52:04 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
But they can't punt everyone. In the USA at least, people would stillI want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi, >> >> home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything. >> >>Until your social credit score gets too low and they punt you from
Privacy is over-rated.
everything at once.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
pay someone for the service and for bandwidth (I guess) so nobody
would be in charge and someone loses revenue if they lose a customer.
Capitalism will find a way.
Dictatorship outranks capitalism.Dictators, like Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Putin, think they understand
everything and then want to control everything. They kill hundreds of millions.
"Capitalism" really means pluralism, letting lots of sane and crazy
people try things to see what actually works.
On 05/04/2022 10:41 PM, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
I think there was a Bell demo of using light for communications, specifically shooting light through a long pipe that used thermal
gradients to keep it confined. This sort of anticipated fiberoptics.
The concept had been around for a long time.
https://www.olympus-global.com/technology/museum/endo/?page=technology_museum
Glass tubes were also used to illuminate tight spots. Developing the technology to create bundles of very thin fibers was the trick.
A lot of ideas are like that. The concept of an airplane had to wait for relatively lightweight IC engines to happen.
There was a cool monorail sort of ride.Now for cool monorails -- in the early 1900's some people were working
on a monorail with gyroscopic stabilization. The big problem was each
car would need a gyroscope.
The idea never took off in the US. Other countries have impressive
systems including maglev designed. Most US monorails are basically
tourist attractions like Seattle, the Disney parks, Jacksonville, and
Las Vegas. Detroit's is much more expensive per passenger mile than buses.
I don't think the people mover at the Detroit airport qualifies as a monorail. It's never been operating when I was there unfortunately. Invariably my connections are between the two furthest apart gates.
I have no idea why anybody would use a monorail for anything real.
On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 11:17:45 AM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
I have no idea why anybody would use a monorail for anything real.Why? Because the ones you've seen are small? Hero's steam turbine was small, too.
As a horizontal-elevator system, both tunnels/subways (The Boring Company) and
elevated rail seem suitable for transportation in cities. Automobiles and ever-wider highways with long commutes are NOT likely to dominate the future. In a city core already full of streets, an elevated rail, monorail or standard gauge,
doesn't take a lot of demolition footprint to install.
On Thursday, 28 April 2022 at 20:16:32 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 02:00:41 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, April 27, 2022 at 12:56:42 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
I want everything on one wireless network. Internet, phones, TV, wifi, >> home automation, cars, utility meters, security, webcams, everything. >>
Privacy is over-rated.
That's a laugh; Internet range is out to near Earth orbit, and you want yourWhat we have is a mess. Many cell companies have various spotty
utility meters to compete for that against your TV remote control? One network
isn't the answer, any more than one TV channel is the answer.
coverage. Ditto cable TV and internet providers. Once people manage to
get an internet provider, they have to install their own cables and
wifi. Wires are strung on poles, sidewalks are dug up, dishes point everywhere and rust or get blown away. People pay for multiple
services.
One uniform microcell mesh system would eliminate all that.
Imagine progress.
History consistently teaches us that one system means lack of competition or investment equals worse service.
On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 11:17:45 AM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
I have no idea why anybody would use a monorail for anything real.
Why? Because the ones you've seen are small? Hero's steam turbine was small, too.
whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 11:17:45 AM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
I have no idea why anybody would use a monorail for anything real.
Why? Because the ones you've seen are small? Hero's steam turbine was small, too.
No, because in order to get static stability your one track has to be
huge and therefore expensive.
whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 11:17:45 AM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
I have no idea why anybody would use a monorail for anything real.
Why? Because the ones you've seen are small? Hero's steam turbine was small, too.
No, because in order to get static stability your one track has to be
huge and therefore expensive.
whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 11:17:45 AM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
I have no idea why anybody would use a monorail for anything real.
Why?  Because the ones you've seen are small?  Hero's steam turbine
was small, too.
No, because in order to get static stability your one track has to be
huge and therefore expensive.
rOn Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 7:26:44 PM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 11:17:45 AM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
I have no idea why anybody would use a monorail for anything
real.
Why? Because the ones you've seen are small? Hero's steam turbine
was small, too.
No, because in order to get static stability your one track has to
be huge and therefore expensive.
Following that reasoning, we'd expect funiculars for intraurban
transit.
The rigid elevated systems use less airspace than a guyed tower
(there's HUGE lateral cable-tension loads in a funicular). A
dovetail monorail is practical and less derail-able than standard
twin-track.
On 9/5/22 12:26 pm, Phil Hobbs wrote:
whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 11:17:45 AM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
I have no idea why anybody would use a monorail for anything real.
Why?  Because the ones you've seen are small?  Hero's steam turbine >>> was small, too.
No, because in order to get static stability your one track has to be
huge and therefore expensive.
Only if the train rides on the track, instead of under it.
whit3rd wrote:
rOn Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 7:26:44 PM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 11:17:45 AM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
I have no idea why anybody would use a monorail for anything
real.
Why? Because the ones you've seen are small? Hero's steam turbine
was small, too.
No, because in order to get static stability your one track has to
be huge and therefore expensive.
Following that reasoning, we'd expect funiculars for intraurban
transit.
Do tell. Cable suspension and all those towers are cheaper than train >tracks? And funiculars are as fast as trains?
The rigid elevated systems use less airspace than a guyed tower
(there's HUGE lateral cable-tension loads in a funicular). A
dovetail monorail is practical and less derail-able than standard
twin-track.
Most derailments are caused by maintenance failures, IIRC. With the
same standard of maintenance, your dovetail gizmos are less likely to
fail, and/or easier to repair?
Don't think so.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
On Mon, 9 May 2022 11:10:25 -0400, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:
whit3rd wrote:
On Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 7:26:44 PM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 11:17:45 AM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
I think our underground systems, MUNI and BART, should tear up their tracks and pave the tubes and run electric busses in them.
whit3rd wrote:
Following that reasoning, we'd expect funiculars for intraurban
transit.
Do tell. Cable suspension and all those towers are cheaper than train
tracks? And funiculars are as fast as trains?
The rigid elevated systems use less airspace than a guyed tower
(there's HUGE lateral cable-tension loads in a funicular). A
dovetail monorail is practical and less derail-able than standard twin-track.
Most derailments are caused by maintenance failures, IIRC. With the
same standard of maintenance, your dovetail gizmos are less likely to
fail, and/or easier to repair?
Clifford Heath wrote:
On 9/5/22 12:26 pm, Phil Hobbs wrote:
whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 11:17:45 AM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
I have no idea why anybody would use a monorail for anything real.
Why?  Because the ones you've seen are small?  Hero's steam
turbine was small, too.
No, because in order to get static stability your one track has to be
huge and therefore expensive.
Only if the train rides on the track, instead of under it.
Sure, and running it upside down like a chairlift will be so much
cheaper than train tracks.
Fanboi alert.
On Mon, 9 May 2022 11:10:25 -0400, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:
whit3rd wrote:
rOn Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 7:26:44 PM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 11:17:45 AM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
I have no idea why anybody would use a monorail for anything
real.
Why? Because the ones you've seen are small? Hero's steam turbine
was small, too.
No, because in order to get static stability your one track has to
be huge and therefore expensive.
Following that reasoning, we'd expect funiculars for intraurban
transit.
Do tell. Cable suspension and all those towers are cheaper than train
tracks? And funiculars are as fast as trains?
The rigid elevated systems use less airspace than a guyed tower
(there's HUGE lateral cable-tension loads in a funicular). A
dovetail monorail is practical and less derail-able than standard
twin-track.
Most derailments are caused by maintenance failures, IIRC. With the
same standard of maintenance, your dovetail gizmos are less likely to
fail, and/or easier to repair?
Don't think so.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
I think our underground systems, MUNI and BART, should tear up their
tracks and pave the tubes and run electric busses in them.
On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 11:43:36 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2022 11:10:25 -0400, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:
whit3rd wrote:I think our underground systems, MUNI and BART, should tear up their
rOn Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 7:26:44 PM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 11:17:45 AM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
I have no idea why anybody would use a monorail for anything
real.
Why? Because the ones you've seen are small? Hero's steam turbine
was small, too.
No, because in order to get static stability your one track has to
be huge and therefore expensive.
Following that reasoning, we'd expect funiculars for intraurban
transit.
Do tell. Cable suspension and all those towers are cheaper than train
tracks? And funiculars are as fast as trains?
The rigid elevated systems use less airspace than a guyed tower
(there's HUGE lateral cable-tension loads in a funicular). A
dovetail monorail is practical and less derail-able than standard
twin-track.
Most derailments are caused by maintenance failures, IIRC. With the
same standard of maintenance, your dovetail gizmos are less likely to
fail, and/or easier to repair?
Don't think so.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
tracks and pave the tubes and run electric busses in them.
Isn't that Elon Musk's idea? The Boring Company.
On Mon, 9 May 2022 11:10:25 -0400, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:
whit3rd wrote:
rOn Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 7:26:44 PM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 11:17:45 AM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
I have no idea why anybody would use a monorail for anything
real.
Why? Because the ones you've seen are small? Hero's steam turbine
was small, too.
No, because in order to get static stability your one track has to
be huge and therefore expensive.
Following that reasoning, we'd expect funiculars for intraurban
transit.
Do tell. Cable suspension and all those towers are cheaper than train >tracks? And funiculars are as fast as trains?
The rigid elevated systems use less airspace than a guyed tower
(there's HUGE lateral cable-tension loads in a funicular). A
dovetail monorail is practical and less derail-able than standard
twin-track.
Most derailments are caused by maintenance failures, IIRC. With the
same standard of maintenance, your dovetail gizmos are less likely to
fail, and/or easier to repair?
Don't think so.
Cheers
Phil HobbsI think our underground systems, MUNI and BART, should tear up their
tracks and pave the tubes and run electric busses in them.
On 05/09/2022 10:44 PM, Ricky wrote:
On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 11:43:36 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2022 11:10:25 -0400, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:
whit3rd wrote:I think our underground systems, MUNI and BART, should tear up their
rOn Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 7:26:44 PM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 11:17:45 AM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote: >>>>>>>
I have no idea why anybody would use a monorail for anything
real.
Why? Because the ones you've seen are small? Hero's steam turbine >>>>>>> was small, too.
No, because in order to get static stability your one track has to >>>>>> be huge and therefore expensive.
Following that reasoning, we'd expect funiculars for intraurban
transit.
Do tell. Cable suspension and all those towers are cheaper than train
tracks? And funiculars are as fast as trains?
The rigid elevated systems use less airspace than a guyed tower
(there's HUGE lateral cable-tension loads in a funicular). A
dovetail monorail is practical and less derail-able than standard
twin-track.
Most derailments are caused by maintenance failures, IIRC. With the
same standard of maintenance, your dovetail gizmos are less likely to
fail, and/or easier to repair?
Don't think so.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
tracks and pave the tubes and run electric busses in them.
Isn't that Elon Musk's idea? The Boring Company.
Teslas in Tunnels.
On Mon, 9 May 2022 23:11:17 -0600, rbowman <bow...@montana.com> wrote:
On 05/09/2022 10:44 PM, Ricky wrote:
On Monday, May 9, 2022 at 11:43:36 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2022 11:10:25 -0400, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:
whit3rd wrote:I think our underground systems, MUNI and BART, should tear up their
rOn Sunday, May 8, 2022 at 7:26:44 PM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote:
whit3rd wrote:
On Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 11:17:45 AM UTC-7, Phil Hobbs wrote: >>>>>>>
I have no idea why anybody would use a monorail for anything >>>>>>>> real.
Why? Because the ones you've seen are small? Hero's steam turbine >>>>>>> was small, too.
No, because in order to get static stability your one track has to >>>>>> be huge and therefore expensive.
Following that reasoning, we'd expect funiculars for intraurban
transit.
Do tell. Cable suspension and all those towers are cheaper than train >>>> tracks? And funiculars are as fast as trains?
The rigid elevated systems use less airspace than a guyed tower
(there's HUGE lateral cable-tension loads in a funicular). A
dovetail monorail is practical and less derail-able than standard
twin-track.
Most derailments are caused by maintenance failures, IIRC. With the
same standard of maintenance, your dovetail gizmos are less likely to >>>> fail, and/or easier to repair?
Don't think so.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
tracks and pave the tubes and run electric busses in them.
Isn't that Elon Musk's idea? The Boring Company.
Teslas in Tunnels.Boring emphasizes speed but needs gigabuck tunnels to get that speed.
It probably won't happen.
Most public transport emphasizes giant vehicles, like 20-car BART
trains with a few hard-to-access stations. Public transport tends to emphasize bigness, to trade latency for speed.
I can drive to work in 12 minutes or spend an hour or more on public
transit. Just waiting for a giant BART train on the platform kills
about 12 minutes.
San Francisco used to have hundreds of private jitneys that would pick
people up and drop them off everywhere. The city outlawed them to
force people onto gigabuck public transport full of union labor.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 230 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 36:10:58 |
| Calls: | 4,903 |
| Files: | 11,506 |
| Messages: | 3,941,669 |
