Isn't it God, Norwegian wod?
Isn't it God, Norwegian wod?
David Brown has suggested that I don';t know as much about Norway as I ought, but I am a full bottle on one aspect Norwegian industrial history.digester where it was still strong enough to start the process of digesting the raw wood chip. That let you get by with 16 tons of NaOH per hundred tons of wood chips, rather than 22 tons.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johan_Richter_(inventor)
worked for the company Kamyr, which made and sold equipment for the paper industry. I met him when he and his wife visited Tasmania in the 1950s.
Around 1950 Kamyr sold a continuous digester to the Associated Pulp and Paper Mills at Burnie, Tasmania where my father was research manager .
It was the sixth one sold and the only one modified to run my father's patented two stage cook.
Instead of sticking fresh NaOH solution into the top of the digester with the raw wood chips, his scheme stuck it halfway down and took out the depleted solution with the digested wood chips at the bottom, but then piped it up to the top of the
Obviously this was a crude approximation to counter-current cooking.
Mu father eventually worked out a scheme to run his digester fully counter current and it worked, and the company patented the idea. That got by with 12 tons of NaOH per hundred tons of wood chips, and cooked the chips even faster.
Johan Richter had spent ten years trying to get his counter-current scheme to work, and was impressed. Kamyr - as an organisation - wasn't and never paid any royalties, though they did sell their digesters set up to run counter-current.
Johan Richter's history of the company reflects the official line, but the copy he sent to my father had a rather more complimentary handwritten message on the title page.
On 4/21/2022 4:24 AM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:digester where it was still strong enough to start the process of digesting the raw wood chip. That let you get by with 16 tons of NaOH per hundred tons of wood chips, rather than 22 tons.
David Brown has suggested that I don';t know as much about Norway as I ought, but I am a full bottle on one aspect Norwegian industrial history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johan_Richter_(inventor)
worked for the company Kamyr, which made and sold equipment for the paper industry. I met him when he and his wife visited Tasmania in the 1950s.
Around 1950 Kamyr sold a continuous digester to the Associated Pulp and Paper Mills at Burnie, Tasmania where my father was research manager .
It was the sixth one sold and the only one modified to run my father's patented two stage cook.
Instead of sticking fresh NaOH solution into the top of the digester with the raw wood chips, his scheme stuck it halfway down and took out the depleted solution with the digested wood chips at the bottom, but then piped it up to the top of the
Obviously this was a crude approximation to counter-current cooking.
Mu father eventually worked out a scheme to run his digester fully counter current and it worked, and the company patented the idea. That got by with 12 tons of NaOH per hundred tons of wood chips, and cooked the chips even faster.
Johan Richter had spent ten years trying to get his counter-current scheme to work, and was impressed. Kamyr - as an organisation - wasn't and never paid any royalties, though they did sell their digesters set up to run counter-current.
Johan Richter's history of the company reflects the official line, but the copy he sent to my father had a rather more complimentary handwritten message on the title page.
IDK if it's this way everywhere but paper plants in the US tend to stink
like shit, I'd rather hang out down wind of a sewage treatment facility
than a paper plant.
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 10:13:23 +0100, Clive Arthur
<clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
Isn't it God, Norwegian wod?
Sloman corrects everyone's spelling but his own.
I wish he'd research the difference between its and it's.
On 4/21/2022 22:01, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 10:13:23 +0100, Clive Arthur
<clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
Isn't it God, Norwegian wod?
Sloman corrects everyone's spelling but his own.
I wish he'd research the difference between its and it's.
Forget the typo, what I though of was the song from
"Rubber Soul"... :) May be he meant it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_V6y1ZCg_8
On 21/04/2022 22:37, Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
On 4/21/2022 22:01, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 10:13:23 +0100, Clive Arthur
<clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
Isn't it God, Norwegian wod?
Sloman corrects everyone's spelling but his own.
I wish he'd research the difference between its and it's.
Forget the typo, what I though of was the song from
"Rubber Soul"... :) May be he meant it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_V6y1ZCg_8
Yes, a song about sexual frustration provoking arson.
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 15:10:32 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:digester where it was still strong enough to start the process of digesting the raw wood chip. That let you get by with 16 tons of NaOH per hundred tons of wood chips, rather than 22 tons.
On 4/21/2022 4:24 AM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
David Brown has suggested that I don';t know as much about Norway as I ought, but I am a full bottle on one aspect Norwegian industrial history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johan_Richter_(inventor)
worked for the company Kamyr, which made and sold equipment for the paper industry. I met him when he and his wife visited Tasmania in the 1950s.
Around 1950 Kamyr sold a continuous digester to the Associated Pulp and Paper Mills at Burnie, Tasmania where my father was research manager .
It was the sixth one sold and the only one modified to run my father's patented two stage cook.
Instead of sticking fresh NaOH solution into the top of the digester with the raw wood chips, his scheme stuck it halfway down and took out the depleted solution with the digested wood chips at the bottom, but then piped it up to the top of the
Obviously this was a crude approximation to counter-current cooking.
Mu father eventually worked out a scheme to run his digester fully counter current and it worked, and the company patented the idea. That got by with 12 tons of NaOH per hundred tons of wood chips, and cooked the chips even faster.
Johan Richter had spent ten years trying to get his counter-current scheme to work, and was impressed. Kamyr - as an organisation - wasn't and never paid any royalties, though they did sell their digesters set up to run counter-current.
Johan Richter's history of the company reflects the official line, but the copy he sent to my father had a rather more complimentary handwritten message on the title page.
IDK if it's this way everywhere but paper plants in the US tend to stink >>like shit, I'd rather hang out down wind of a sewage treatment facility >>than a paper plant.
I have toured the sewers of Paris and the giant wastewater treatment
plant in se San Francisco. The sf tour was much more interesting and
smelled a lot better.
SF has one combined sewage and runoff system, but it doesn't rain a
lot here so that's not too unreasonable.
Isn't it God, Norwegian wod?
Forget the typo, what I though of was the song from
"Rubber Soul"... :) May be he meant it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_V6y1ZCg_8
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 15:10:32 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:digester where it was still strong enough to start the process of digesting the raw wood chip. That let you get by with 16 tons of NaOH per hundred tons of wood chips, rather than 22 tons.
On 4/21/2022 4:24 AM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
David Brown has suggested that I don';t know as much about Norway as I ought, but I am a full bottle on one aspect Norwegian industrial history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johan_Richter_(inventor)
worked for the company Kamyr, which made and sold equipment for the paper industry. I met him when he and his wife visited Tasmania in the 1950s.
Around 1950 Kamyr sold a continuous digester to the Associated Pulp and Paper Mills at Burnie, Tasmania where my father was research manager .
It was the sixth one sold and the only one modified to run my father's patented two stage cook.
Instead of sticking fresh NaOH solution into the top of the digester with the raw wood chips, his scheme stuck it halfway down and took out the depleted solution with the digested wood chips at the bottom, but then piped it up to the top of the
Obviously this was a crude approximation to counter-current cooking.
Mu father eventually worked out a scheme to run his digester fully counter current and it worked, and the company patented the idea. That got by with 12 tons of NaOH per hundred tons of wood chips, and cooked the chips even faster.
Johan Richter had spent ten years trying to get his counter-current scheme to work, and was impressed. Kamyr - as an organisation - wasn't and never paid any royalties, though they did sell their digesters set up to run counter-current.
Johan Richter's history of the company reflects the official line, but the copy he sent to my father had a rather more complimentary handwritten message on the title page.
IDK if it's this way everywhere but paper plants in the US tend to stink
like shit, I'd rather hang out down wind of a sewage treatment facility
than a paper plant.
I have toured the sewers of Paris and the giant wastewater treatment
plant in se San Francisco. The sf tour was much more interesting and
smelled a lot better.
SF has one combined sewage and runoff system, but it doesn't rain a
lot here so that's not too unreasonable.
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 10:13:23 +0100, Clive Arthur
<cl...@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
Isn't it Good, Norwegian wood?Sloman corrects everyone's spelling but his own.
I wish he'd research the difference between its and it's.
On 4/21/2022 4:24 AM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:digester where it was still strong enough to start the process of digesting the raw wood chip. That let you get by with 16 tons of NaOH per hundred tons of wood chips, rather than 22 tons.
David Brown has suggested that I don';t know as much about Norway as I ought, but I am a full bottle on one aspect Norwegian industrial history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johan_Richter_(inventor)
worked for the company Kamyr, which made and sold equipment for the paper industry. I met him when he and his wife visited Tasmania in the 1950s.
Around 1950 Kamyr sold a continuous digester to the Associated Pulp and Paper Mills at Burnie, Tasmania where my father was research manager .
It was the sixth one sold and the only one modified to run my father's patented two stage cook.
Instead of sticking fresh NaOH solution into the top of the digester with the raw wood chips, his scheme stuck it halfway down and took out the depleted solution with the digested wood chips at the bottom, but then piped it up to the top of the
Obviously this was a crude approximation to counter-current cooking.
Mu father eventually worked out a scheme to run his digester fully counter current and it worked, and the company patented the idea. That got by with 12 tons of NaOH per hundred tons of wood chips, and cooked the chips even faster.
Johan Richter had spent ten years trying to get his counter-current scheme to work, and was impressed. Kamyr - as an organisation - wasn't and never paid any royalties, though they did sell their digesters set up to run counter-current.
Johan Richter's history of the company reflects the official line, but the copy he sent to my father had a rather more complimentary handwritten message on the title page.
IDK if it's this way everywhere but paper plants in the US tend to stink like shit, I'd rather hang out down wind of a sewage treatment facility than a paper plant.
On 4/21/2022 10:03 PM, Phil Allison wrote:
 Dimiter Popoff wrote:
-----------------------------------
 >
Isn't it God, Norwegian wod?
Forget the typo, what I though of was the song from
"Rubber Soul"... :) May be he meant it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_V6y1ZCg_8
** Brilliant song and recording.
 Believed to be the first use of a Sitar or any Indian instrument on
a pop song.
They were still experimenting with stereo too I think, panning the lead vocals that far right for much of the song would be rare for a pop song today, keeping the lead vocal front and center is where you usually find
it.
Reminds me of what seems like an odd decision to pan Eddie Van Halen's
guitar hard left and the reverb to the right thru most of Van Halen 1:
<https://youtu.be/Y-IUB62zDlA>
Dimiter Popoff wrote:
-----------------------------------
>
Isn't it God, Norwegian wod?
Forget the typo, what I though of was the song from
"Rubber Soul"... :) May be he meant it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_V6y1ZCg_8
** Brilliant song and recording.
Believed to be the first use of a Sitar or any Indian instrument on a pop song.
Kicked off the whole Indian classical sound in the late 60s - the Rolling Stones
( Paint it Black) and Eric Burdon ( Monterey) followed up with hit songs
using the same musical ideas.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASviQQinEbk
..... Phil
Dimiter Popoff wrote:
-----------------------------------
>
Isn't it God, Norwegian wod?
Forget the typo, what I though of was the song from
"Rubber Soul"... :) May be he meant it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_V6y1ZCg_8
** Brilliant song and recording.
Believed to be the first use of a Sitar or any Indian instrument on a pop song.
Kicked off the whole Indian classical sound in the late 60s - the Rolling Stones
( Paint it Black) and Eric Burdon ( Monterey) followed up with hit songs
using the same musical ideas.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASviQQinEbk
..... Phil
On 4/22/2022 5:03, Phil Allison wrote:
Dimiter Popoff wrote:
-----------------------------------
Isn't it Good, Norwegian wood?
Forget the typo, what I though of was the song from
"Rubber Soul"... :) Maybe he meant it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_V6y1ZCg_8
** Brilliant song and recording.
Believed to be the first use of a Sitar or any Indian instrument on a pop song.
Kicked off the whole Indian classical sound in the late 60s - the Rolling Stones
( Paint it Black) and Eric Burdon ( Monterey) followed up with hit songs using the same musical ideas.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASviQQinEbk
Hah! Had never noticed that it is a sitar in "Paint it Black".
And to me the is "the" Rolling Stones song (I also like many
others but this one stands out).
On 4/21/2022 3:37 PM, John Larkin wrote:digester where it was still strong enough to start the process of digesting the raw wood chip. That let you get by with 16 tons of NaOH per hundred tons of wood chips, rather than 22 tons.
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 15:10:32 -0400, bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote:
On 4/21/2022 4:24 AM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
David Brown has suggested that I don';t know as much about Norway as I ought, but I am a full bottle on one aspect Norwegian industrial history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johan_Richter_(inventor)
worked for the company Kamyr, which made and sold equipment for the paper industry. I met him when he and his wife visited Tasmania in the 1950s.
Around 1950 Kamyr sold a continuous digester to the Associated Pulp and Paper Mills at Burnie, Tasmania where my father was research manager .
It was the sixth one sold and the only one modified to run my father's patented two stage cook.
Instead of sticking fresh NaOH solution into the top of the digester with the raw wood chips, his scheme stuck it halfway down and took out the depleted solution with the digested wood chips at the bottom, but then piped it up to the top of the
Obviously this was a crude approximation to counter-current cooking.
Mu father eventually worked out a scheme to run his digester fully counter current and it worked, and the company patented the idea. That got by with 12 tons of NaOH per hundred tons of wood chips, and cooked the chips even faster.
Johan Richter had spent ten years trying to get his counter-current scheme to work, and was impressed. Kamyr - as an organisation - wasn't and never paid any royalties, though they did sell their digesters set up to run counter-current.
Johan Richter's history of the company reflects the official line, but the copy he sent to my father had a rather more complimentary handwritten message on the title page.
IDK if it's this way everywhere but paper plants in the US tend to stink >> like shit, I'd rather hang out down wind of a sewage treatment facility >> than a paper plant.
I have toured the sewers of Paris and the giant wastewater treatment
plant in se San Francisco. The sf tour was much more interesting and smelled a lot better.
SF has one combined sewage and runoff system, but it doesn't rain a
lot here so that's not too unreasonable.
I think sewage treatment plants have gotten a lot better about hydrogen sulfide and other noxious fume releases, I can't think of a time I've
driven past one where it smelled very foul. Maybe paper plants are
better now too, the one I'm remembering is from maybe 20 years ago in northern New Hampshire, a really large facility and boy did it stink
that day from several miles away.
When I was a kid there was a chocolate bar factory a few towns over from
the town I grew up in, it often smelled like hot cocoa on summer days driving by with my late father. But imagine being a neighbor and
smelling the hot cocoa for hours, days, weeks at a time...probably gets
old fast
On Friday, April 22, 2022 at 9:04:58 PM UTC+10, Dimiter Popoff wrote:
On 4/22/2022 5:03, Phil Allison wrote:
Dimiter Popoff wrote:
-----------------------------------
Isn't it Good, Norwegian wood?
Forget the typo, what I though of was the song from
"Rubber Soul"... :) Maybe he meant it.
Of course I did. It's a far-fetched joke. Kamyr was a branch of the Norwegian wood processing industry.
Hah! Had never noticed that it is a sitar in "Paint it Black".https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_V6y1ZCg_8
** Brilliant song and recording.
Believed to be the first use of a Sitar or any Indian instrument on a pop song.
Kicked off the whole Indian classical sound in the late 60s - the Rolling Stones
( Paint it Black) and Eric Burdon ( Monterey) followed up with hit songs >>> using the same musical ideas.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASviQQinEbk
And to me the is "the" Rolling Stones song (I also like many
others but this one stands out).
"Norwegian Wood" is Beatles - Lennon/McCartney, if mostly Lennon - from 1965.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_Wood_(This_Bird_Has_Flown)
The Rolling Stones may have been almost as famous, bu they never struck me as being in the same league.
On 21/04/2022 22:37, Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
On 4/21/2022 22:01, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 10:13:23 +0100, Clive Arthur
<clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
Isn't it God, Norwegian wod?
Sloman corrects everyone's spelling but his own.
I wish he'd research the difference between its and it's.
Forget the typo, what I though of was the song from
"Rubber Soul"... :) May be he meant it.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_V6y1ZCg_8>
Yes, a song about sexual frustration provoking arson.
"Norwegian Wood" is Beatles - Lennon/McCartney, if mostly Lennon - from 1965.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_Wood_(This_Bird_Has_Flown)
The Rolling Stones may have been almost as famous, bu they never struck me as being in the same league.
Well nobody is in the league of the Beatles of course, nobody
can even come close.
Yes, a song about sexual frustration provoking arson.Teasing leading to furniture combustion in a fireplace.
Hardly rises to the level arson. Vandalism?
IMO there were just a few good Beatles covers - like this one:
Dimiter Popoff wrote:
=================
"Norwegian Wood" is Beatles - Lennon/McCartney, if mostly Lennon - from 1965.Well nobody is in the league of the Beatles of course, nobody
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_Wood_(This_Bird_Has_Flown)
The Rolling Stones may have been almost as famous, bu they never struck me as being in the same league.
can even come close.
** Here is a list of all Beatles songs ever released.
https://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/
I counted 341 and can recall the sound of most of them.
IMO there were just a few good Beatles covers - like this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBGBBMLZ6bQ
...... Phil
Phil Allison wrote:
============================
IMO there were just a few good Beatles covers - like this one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F2sn2rQiXo
.... Phil
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 23:32:30 +0100, Clive Arthur
<clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
On 21/04/2022 22:37, Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
On 4/21/2022 22:01, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 10:13:23 +0100, Clive Arthur
<clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
Isn't it God, Norwegian wod?
Sloman corrects everyone's spelling but his own.
I wish he'd research the difference between its and it's.
Forget the typo, what I though of was the song from
"Rubber Soul"... :) May be he meant it.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_V6y1ZCg_8>
Yes, a song about sexual frustration provoking arson.
Teasing leading to furniture combustion in a fireplace.
Hardly rises to the level arson. Vandalism?
I'm not sure what it would be called in the US.
Joe Gwinn
On 22/04/2022 21:36, Joe Gwinn wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 23:32:30 +0100, Clive Arthur
<clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
On 21/04/2022 22:37, Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
On 4/21/2022 22:01, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 10:13:23 +0100, Clive Arthur
<clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
Isn't it God, Norwegian wod?
Sloman corrects everyone's spelling but his own.
I wish he'd research the difference between its and it's.
Forget the typo, what I though of was the song from
"Rubber Soul"... :) May be he meant it.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_V6y1ZCg_8>
Yes, a song about sexual frustration provoking arson.
Teasing leading to furniture combustion in a fireplace.
Hardly rises to the level arson. Vandalism?
I'm not sure what it would be called in the US.
Joe Gwinn
I had always thought it meant setting the room on fire. Seems I'm not >alone...
<Wikipedia>
McCartney commented on the final verse of the song: "In our world the
guy had to have some sort of revenge. It could have meant I lit a fire
to keep myself warm, and wasn't the decor of her house wonderful? But it >didn't, it meant I burned the fucking place down as an act of revenge,
and then we left it there and went into the instrumental."
</Wikipedia>
I think it is Seattle that has a pulp mill near the airport. You walk out of the building and WHAM! Welcome to Seattle!
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 23:32:30 +0100, Clive Arthur
<clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
On 21/04/2022 22:37, Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
On 4/21/2022 22:01, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 10:13:23 +0100, Clive Arthur
<clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
Isn't it God, Norwegian wod?
Sloman corrects everyone's spelling but his own.
I wish he'd research the difference between its and it's.
Forget the typo, what I though of was the song from
"Rubber Soul"... :) May be he meant it.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_V6y1ZCg_8>
Yes, a song about sexual frustration provoking arson.
Teasing leading to furniture combustion in a fireplace.
On 2022-04-22, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 23:32:30 +0100, Clive Arthur
<clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
On 21/04/2022 22:37, Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
On 4/21/2022 22:01, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 10:13:23 +0100, Clive Arthur
<clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
Isn't it God, Norwegian wod?
Sloman corrects everyone's spelling but his own.
I wish he'd research the difference between its and it's.
Forget the typo, what I though of was the song from
"Rubber Soul"... :) May be he meant it.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_V6y1ZCg_8>
Yes, a song about sexual frustration provoking arson.
Teasing leading to furniture combustion in a fireplace.
There wasn't a chair.
But I recall two versions of the lyrics, one saying "I once met a girl
...", the other saying that "I once had a girl ...", the difference
being the implications of had versus met. This was always bothering
me.
On 28/04/2022 17:15, Joe Gwinn wrote:
<snip>
But I recall two versions of the lyrics, one saying "I once met a girl
...", the other saying that "I once had a girl ...", the difference
being the implications of had versus met. This was always bothering
me.
The "I once had a girl" line is a feed for "Or should I say, she once
had me". In this context the meaning of the second 'had' is 'fooled',
which is common English informal usage.
But I recall two versions of the lyrics, one saying "I once met a girl
...", the other saying that "I once had a girl ..."
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 20:22:27 -0000 (UTC), Jasen Betts
<usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:
On 2022-04-22, Joe Gwinn <joegwinn@comcast.net> wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 23:32:30 +0100, Clive Arthur >>><clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
On 21/04/2022 22:37, Dimiter_Popoff wrote:
On 4/21/2022 22:01, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 10:13:23 +0100, Clive Arthur
<clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:
Isn't it God, Norwegian wod?
Sloman corrects everyone's spelling but his own.
I wish he'd research the difference between its and it's.
Forget the typo, what I though of was the song from
"Rubber Soul"... :) May be he meant it.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_V6y1ZCg_8>
Yes, a song about sexual frustration provoking arson.
Teasing leading to furniture combustion in a fireplace.
There wasn't a chair.
I noticed that now as well, after the quote from a Beetle in the Wiki article.
But I recall two versions of the lyrics, one saying "I once met a girl
...", the other saying that "I once had a girl ...", the difference
being the implications of had versus met. This was always bothering
me.
Later, it came to me that the "had" story given in the Wiki didn't
hold up:
If the girl was already a mistress, there would not likely be any
tease involved, and if her apartment had in fact been set alight,
there would be no mystery as to who set the fire, or why for that
matter, and we would have seen news reports of a real arson
prosecution. Which never happened.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 185 |
| Nodes: | 16 (1 / 15) |
| Uptime: | 07:17:00 |
| Calls: | 3,645 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 11,145 |
| Messages: | 3,445,015 |