• Are there still cordless flip phones?

    From Joerg@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 12 21:27:20 2022
    Now that the cell system has been botched for small devices because of
    the 3G shut-off, a question arises:

    Are there still cordless flip phones that tie into the regular landline
    or DECT? Many older and disabled people need that. Regular cordless
    phones are bulky and have exposed knobs. Not practical to carry in a
    pocket. It can be bone simple, even sans display or maybe single-line.
    Heck, even half a dozen programmed phone numbers and no keypad suffices.
    In the past they existed:

    https://jerhetrick.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/19398b-1170x780.jpg https://www.uniden.info/download/ompdf/ELBT595om.pdf

    Excellent idea, but then all that went away. There are some
    single-button lanyard systems but usually way overpriced. Most come with mandatory and expensive subscription.

    Are there alternatives?

    --
    Regards, Joerg

    http://www.analogconsultants.com/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadenc@21:1/5 to Joerg on Sun Mar 13 06:58:26 2022
    Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> wrote in news:j95dloFglolU1 @mid.individual.net:

    https://jerhetrick.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/19398b-1170x780.jpg

    I do not know if that band was public use here. Or could have since
    changed?

    Let me whip out my US Radio spectrum chart...

    Very narrow slot. Maybe they sold it off.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Gardner@21:1/5 to Joerg on Sun Mar 13 08:40:56 2022
    On 13/03/22 05:27, Joerg wrote:
    Now that the cell system has been botched for small devices because of the 3G shut-off, a question arises:

    Worse: forcibly changing all landlines to SIP via a router.
    What happens when there is a power cut?
    What happens where cellular reception is patchy?


    Are there still cordless flip phones that tie into the regular landline or DECT?
    Many older and disabled people need that. Regular cordless phones are bulky and
    have exposed knobs. Not practical to carry in a pocket. It can be bone simple,
    even sans display or maybe single-line. Heck, even half a dozen programmed phone
    numbers and no keypad suffices. In the past they existed:

    I have cellular flip phone so I can bury it in my
    pocket, but they are rare. Doro makes such phones for
    the elderly at reasonable prices.


    https://jerhetrick.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/19398b-1170x780.jpg https://www.uniden.info/download/ompdf/ELBT595om.pdf

    Excellent idea, but then all that went away. There are some single-button lanyard systems but usually way overpriced. Most come with mandatory and expensive subscription.

    Years ago my mother had a phone from amazon that
    had a pendant emergency button. When pressed
    it dials up to three different numbers until
    someone answers. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Amplicom-PowerTel-Alarm-Corded-Telephone/dp/B001EZC4SG

    "Currently unavailable" of course, but it might
    be worth looking at that manufacturer's current
    products

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich S@21:1/5 to Tom Gardner on Sun Mar 13 14:19:22 2022
    On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 8:41:06 AM UTC, Tom Gardner wrote:
    On 13/03/22 05:27, Joerg wrote:
    Now that the cell system has been botched for small devices because of the 3G
    shut-off, a question arises:
    Worse: forcibly changing all landlines to SIP via a router.
    What happens when there is a power cut?
    What happens where cellular reception is patchy?
    Are there still cordless flip phones that tie into the regular landline or DECT?
    Many older and disabled people need that. Regular cordless phones are bulky and
    have exposed knobs. Not practical to carry in a pocket. It can be bone simple,
    even sans display or maybe single-line. Heck, even half a dozen programmed phone
    numbers and no keypad suffices. In the past they existed:
    I have cellular flip phone so I can bury it in my
    pocket, but they are rare. Doro makes such phones for
    the elderly at reasonable prices.
    https://jerhetrick.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/19398b-1170x780.jpg https://www.uniden.info/download/ompdf/ELBT595om.pdf

    Excellent idea, but then all that went away. There are some single-button lanyard systems but usually way overpriced. Most come with mandatory and expensive subscription.
    Years ago my mother had a phone from amazon that
    had a pendant emergency button. When pressed
    it dials up to three different numbers until
    someone answers. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Amplicom-PowerTel-Alarm-Corded-Telephone/dp/B001EZC4SG

    "Currently unavailable" of course, but it might
    be worth looking at that manufacturer's current
    products

    Hi Joerg,
    Another approach, is many DECT cordless phone/answers also
    have Bluetooth feature, so the use can pair wireless headset
    with the base. A carefully chosen location for base might give
    you enough range with the BT headset / connection.

    All users no matter the age, appreciate a well designed product.
    Ease of use that attains excellent level represents
    a well thought design, it takes work, and is not an accident.

    I'm curious why you think a Flip phone is better for your
    client. I admit my elder family members like them too, but
    honestly I don't think that design is so easy to use. Its only
    benefit I see is a obvious "answer" and "end call" actions
    re opening/closing via the hinge switch.

    IME, people "of a certain age" &/or with dexterity issues, etc.,
    just need some parameters "increased" .
    I.e. large(er) buttons with high contrast labeling, and
    no confusing symbols, no misplaced switches/buttons,
    Also nice, "snappy" force-deflection behavior of the push-buttons.
    (mechanical feedback). Other feedback (beeps, lights) too.
    The hand-grip area should be free of any buttons, (anything that
    could be mistakenly pressed by the user). Bigger fonts,
    louder audio, Etc,
    well, you get the idea.
    regards, RS

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Engelhardt@21:1/5 to Rich S on Sun Mar 13 19:04:29 2022
    On 3/13/2022 5:19 PM, Rich S wrote:
    ...
    I'm curious why you think a Flip phone is better for your
    client. I admit my elder family members like them too, but
    honestly I don't think that design is so easy to use. ...

    I had a flip phone until 4 years ago when my wife (spontaneously) bought
    me an iPhone. I really like its camera. Otherwise not so much - it's
    WAY harder to use. I'm constantly getting screens that I never wanted
    and accidentally invoked. Or can't figure out what I do want to do.
    Never had those problems with the flip phone.

    There's very little that I want a phone to do and the iPhone's feature
    glut obscures the essentials.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rick C@21:1/5 to Tom Gardner on Sun Mar 13 16:29:31 2022
    On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 4:41:06 AM UTC-4, Tom Gardner wrote:
    On 13/03/22 05:27, Joerg wrote:
    Now that the cell system has been botched for small devices because of the 3G
    shut-off, a question arises:
    Worse: forcibly changing all landlines to SIP via a router.
    What happens when there is a power cut?
    What happens where cellular reception is patchy?

    I have exactly that problem. I have nearly no cell service here. I have to use the cell phone over the Internet. When the Internet is down I can't place a phone call to the provider to report it. I can send a text message by typing it and finding a
    spot with enough cellular signal to get a "burst" transmission. Voice is hard to get to connect though.

    If the electricity is out, I have to get in the car, then drive up the hill to get a signal on the phone. The electric company isn't SMS capable. Maybe I need to bring that up at the next shareholders meeting. It's a coop, so all the customers are
    shareholders.


    Are there still cordless flip phones that tie into the regular landline or DECT?
    Many older and disabled people need that. Regular cordless phones are bulky and
    have exposed knobs. Not practical to carry in a pocket. It can be bone simple,
    even sans display or maybe single-line. Heck, even half a dozen programmed phone
    numbers and no keypad suffices. In the past they existed:
    I have cellular flip phone so I can bury it in my
    pocket, but they are rare. Doro makes such phones for
    the elderly at reasonable prices.

    Every cell provider offers flip phones. ATT sent me one to replace my old, incompatible phone that has huge number buttons and a big screen for a flip phone. They did a poor job for the blind though. The pip on the '5' button is very slight and they
    have no pips on the red (power) and green (call) buttons. My friend who is legally blind has a similar model and has some trouble feeling his way around the keypad on that one too. His microwave and house phone have velcro bits on the important buttons,
    then he has to hunt for the rest. I couldn't find a way to add speed dial numbers on the dam thing. They expect you to use the friggin' menu based directory! Fortunately his phone company offers speed dial. So he can call anyone in the list, up to 8
    people if I recall.

    It would be so easy to add the pips in a way that he could feel them easily, but things are not really designed for the users. They are designed for the bosses of the designers. A true Dilbert experience.

    --

    Rick C.

    - Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
    - Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Y@21:1/5 to Rich S on Sun Mar 13 17:01:45 2022
    On 3/13/2022 2:19 PM, Rich S wrote:
    Another approach, is many DECT cordless phone/answers also
    have Bluetooth feature, so the use can pair wireless headset
    with the base. A carefully chosen location for base might give
    you enough range with the BT headset / connection.

    I suspect the issue is portability. It blows my mind that folks
    carry their (cell) phones around the house with them -- or, have to
    leave it someplace they can rush to when it rings lest they miss
    an incoming call.

    OTOH, if you *need* to carry <something>, you'd want it to be as
    small as possible.

    We have BT earpieces so the phone system can find us from
    anywhere on the property (beacons located in the front and back
    yards). But, I think a button -- for emergencies -- would be
    easier for someone to deal with (esp if in cognitive decline).

    [We have audio monitors in the bathrooms that "listen" for
    cries of distress so the occupant doesn't need to wear an
    earpiece in the shower]

    All users no matter the age, appreciate a well designed product.

    I'm not sure that's true. I see lots of poorly designed products
    in use -- simply because folks don't have a real choice.

    Close your eyes and try to use your microwave oven. Or, your
    household thermostat.

    Plug your ears and try to do laundry -- how often will you "forget"
    there are clothes in the wash?

    Ease of use that attains excellent level represents
    a well thought design, it takes work, and is not an accident.

    Too often, engineers make these decisions and not folks who are
    actually skilled in their markets.

    We designed a piece of kit for commercial fisher/lobster-men
    decades ago. As it would be in a wet environment, we opted for
    a membrane keypad (relatively new at the time). I complained to
    my boss that the buttons were too hard to press; it was like
    pressing on a piece of metal (no "give"). He laughed and
    described the *working* hands of a fisherman, covered with
    fish guts poking at the buttons on a rough sea...

    I'm curious why you think a Flip phone is better for your
    client. I admit my elder family members like them too, but
    honestly I don't think that design is so easy to use. Its only
    benefit I see is a obvious "answer" and "end call" actions
    re opening/closing via the hinge switch.

    I'd guess size and the fact that the buttons are protected when
    closed. No "butt-dialing". No "screens" to sort through.

    IME, people "of a certain age" &/or with dexterity issues, etc.,
    just need some parameters "increased" .
    I.e. large(er) buttons with high contrast labeling, and
    no confusing symbols, no misplaced switches/buttons,
    Also nice, "snappy" force-deflection behavior of the push-buttons. (mechanical feedback). Other feedback (beeps, lights) too.
    The hand-grip area should be free of any buttons, (anything that
    could be mistakenly pressed by the user). Bigger fonts,
    louder audio, Etc,

    As a screen shouldn't respond to "touches" by your cheek, etc.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rick C@21:1/5 to Rich S on Sun Mar 13 16:50:54 2022
    On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 5:19:30 PM UTC-4, Rich S wrote:
    On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 8:41:06 AM UTC, Tom Gardner wrote:
    On 13/03/22 05:27, Joerg wrote:
    Now that the cell system has been botched for small devices because of the 3G
    shut-off, a question arises:
    Worse: forcibly changing all landlines to SIP via a router.
    What happens when there is a power cut?
    What happens where cellular reception is patchy?
    Are there still cordless flip phones that tie into the regular landline or DECT?
    Many older and disabled people need that. Regular cordless phones are bulky and
    have exposed knobs. Not practical to carry in a pocket. It can be bone simple,
    even sans display or maybe single-line. Heck, even half a dozen programmed phone
    numbers and no keypad suffices. In the past they existed:
    I have cellular flip phone so I can bury it in my
    pocket, but they are rare. Doro makes such phones for
    the elderly at reasonable prices.
    https://jerhetrick.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/19398b-1170x780.jpg https://www.uniden.info/download/ompdf/ELBT595om.pdf

    Excellent idea, but then all that went away. There are some single-button
    lanyard systems but usually way overpriced. Most come with mandatory and expensive subscription.
    Years ago my mother had a phone from amazon that
    had a pendant emergency button. When pressed
    it dials up to three different numbers until
    someone answers. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Amplicom-PowerTel-Alarm-Corded-Telephone/dp/B001EZC4SG

    "Currently unavailable" of course, but it might
    be worth looking at that manufacturer's current
    products
    Hi Joerg,
    Another approach, is many DECT cordless phone/answers also
    have Bluetooth feature, so the use can pair wireless headset
    with the base. A carefully chosen location for base might give
    you enough range with the BT headset / connection.

    I seem to recall my friend's house phone has a means of connecting to his cell phone to make calls. Not sure what good that is other than being able to use a larger, more facile device.


    All users no matter the age, appreciate a well designed product.
    Ease of use that attains excellent level represents
    a well thought design, it takes work, and is not an accident.

    Amen! There are so many products I see, telephones included, that are redesigned every six months, but don't change lots of mistakes. In fact, there are often software glitches that remain in generation after generation because they don't want to touch
    anything they don't have to.


    I'm curious why you think a Flip phone is better for your
    client. I admit my elder family members like them too, but
    honestly I don't think that design is so easy to use. Its only
    benefit I see is a obvious "answer" and "end call" actions
    re opening/closing via the hinge switch.

    He said, so the phone can be carried around the house in his pocket. A house phone requires a bleeding holster or something.


    IME, people "of a certain age" &/or with dexterity issues, etc.,
    just need some parameters "increased" .
    I.e. large(er) buttons with high contrast labeling, and
    no confusing symbols, no misplaced switches/buttons,
    Also nice, "snappy" force-deflection behavior of the push-buttons. (mechanical feedback). Other feedback (beeps, lights) too.
    The hand-grip area should be free of any buttons, (anything that
    could be mistakenly pressed by the user). Bigger fonts,
    louder audio, Etc,
    well, you get the idea.
    regards, RS

    The flip phones are made for the older generation and often have haptic buttons with larger keycaps that are easier to see. They just don't provide proper pips to find the buttons if you can't see them.

    Getting old sucks and no one cares.

    --

    Rick C.

    + Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
    + Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rick C@21:1/5 to Don Y on Sun Mar 13 17:21:14 2022
    On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 8:02:07 PM UTC-4, Don Y wrote:
    On 3/13/2022 2:19 PM, Rich S wrote:
    Another approach, is many DECT cordless phone/answers also
    have Bluetooth feature, so the use can pair wireless headset
    with the base. A carefully chosen location for base might give
    you enough range with the BT headset / connection.
    I suspect the issue is portability. It blows my mind that folks
    carry their (cell) phones around the house with them -- or, have to
    leave it someplace they can rush to when it rings lest they miss
    an incoming call.

    OTOH, if you *need* to carry <something>, you'd want it to be as
    small as possible.

    We have BT earpieces so the phone system can find us from
    anywhere on the property (beacons located in the front and back
    yards). But, I think a button -- for emergencies -- would be
    easier for someone to deal with (esp if in cognitive decline).

    [We have audio monitors in the bathrooms that "listen" for
    cries of distress so the occupant doesn't need to wear an
    earpiece in the shower]
    All users no matter the age, appreciate a well designed product.
    I'm not sure that's true. I see lots of poorly designed products
    in use -- simply because folks don't have a real choice.

    Close your eyes and try to use your microwave oven. Or, your
    household thermostat.

    Plug your ears and try to do laundry -- how often will you "forget"
    there are clothes in the wash?
    Ease of use that attains excellent level represents
    a well thought design, it takes work, and is not an accident.
    Too often, engineers make these decisions and not folks who are
    actually skilled in their markets.

    We designed a piece of kit for commercial fisher/lobster-men
    decades ago. As it would be in a wet environment, we opted for
    a membrane keypad (relatively new at the time). I complained to
    my boss that the buttons were too hard to press; it was like
    pressing on a piece of metal (no "give"). He laughed and
    described the *working* hands of a fisherman, covered with
    fish guts poking at the buttons on a rough sea...
    I'm curious why you think a Flip phone is better for your
    client. I admit my elder family members like them too, but
    honestly I don't think that design is so easy to use. Its only
    benefit I see is a obvious "answer" and "end call" actions
    re opening/closing via the hinge switch.
    I'd guess size and the fact that the buttons are protected when
    closed. No "butt-dialing". No "screens" to sort through.
    IME, people "of a certain age" &/or with dexterity issues, etc.,
    just need some parameters "increased" .
    I.e. large(er) buttons with high contrast labeling, and
    no confusing symbols, no misplaced switches/buttons,
    Also nice, "snappy" force-deflection behavior of the push-buttons. (mechanical feedback). Other feedback (beeps, lights) too.
    The hand-grip area should be free of any buttons, (anything that
    could be mistakenly pressed by the user). Bigger fonts,
    louder audio, Etc,
    As a screen shouldn't respond to "touches" by your cheek, etc.

    Lol, I've had my smart phone sense a touch when I didn't even touch the screen. In the car the screen is not so sensitive, but it is terrible about thinking a touch was a swipe because the car moved as I touched the screen. A touch screen is a terrible
    idea in a moving car. You would think some of the effort in the millions of lines of code would be for voice control for most of the features in the car, but it only responds to "dial" and "navigate" and "play" sorts of commands. Even my bleeding
    phone will tell me what 10,000 divided by 365 is. The answer is 42. Seems like the answer is always 42, no matter the question. Hmmm... maybe I have the wrong phone.

    --

    Rick C.

    -- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
    -- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich S@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 15 10:34:29 2022
    Lol, I've had my smart phone sense a touch when I didn't even touch the screen. In the car the screen is not so sensitive, but it is terrible about thinking a touch was a swipe because the car moved as I touched the screen. A touch screen is a terrible
    idea in a moving car. You would think some of the effort in the millions of lines of code would be for voice control for most of the features in the car, but it only responds to "dial" and "navigate" and "play" sorts of commands. Even my bleeding phone
    will tell me what 10,000 divided by 365 is. The answer is 42. Seems like the answer is always 42, no matter the question. Hmmm... maybe I have the wrong phone.

    --

    touchscreens can get flaky if the surface is gunked up
    so routine cleaning might help ;-)

    re face triggering, the IR reflective sensor
    (near the speaker / ear piece transducer)
    is supposed to detect when the phone is
    against any surface (like your face, a table,...)
    and so shut off the screen & touch interface.
    If that sensor is gunked up, well, see above.
    cheers, RS

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg@21:1/5 to Bob Engelhardt on Tue Mar 15 11:36:53 2022
    On 3/13/22 4:04 PM, Bob Engelhardt wrote:
    On 3/13/2022 5:19 PM, Rich S wrote:
    ...
    I'm curious why you think a Flip phone is better for your
    client.  I admit my elder family members like them too, but
    honestly I don't think that design is so easy to use. ...


    They are more sturdy than smart phones. No butt cracks in the screen, no accidental button presses. Good flip phones also do not accidentally
    turn themselves on in a pocket and then when you have an emergency the
    battery is exhausted.


    I had a flip phone until 4 years ago when my wife (spontaneously) bought
    me an iPhone.  I really like its camera.  Otherwise not so much - it's
    WAY harder to use.


    Exactly. Just thefact that nearly everything is touch-screen on those is
    a problem for elderly.


    ... I'm constantly getting screens that I never wanted
    and accidentally invoked.  Or can't figure out what I do want to do.
    Never had those problems with the flip phone.


    Yup. Not much different with Android. Flip phone are so much simpler.
    You open them up and either start dialing or hit one of the speed dial
    buttons. That's it. When a call comes in all you have to do is fold it
    open and talk.


    There's very little that I want a phone to do and the iPhone's feature
    glut obscures the essentials.


    I use a lot of stuff on my smart phone now, though almost nothing that
    has to do with communications. Missing my Nokia 2115i candy bar phone,
    still have it and that thing is almost indestructible.

    --
    Regards, Joerg

    http://www.analogconsultants.com/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg@21:1/5 to Tom Gardner on Tue Mar 15 11:53:20 2022
    On 3/13/22 12:40 AM, Tom Gardner wrote:
    On 13/03/22 05:27, Joerg wrote:
    Now that the cell system has been botched for small devices because of
    the 3G shut-off, a question arises:

    Worse: forcibly changing all landlines to SIP via a router.
    What happens when there is a power cut?
    What happens where cellular reception is patchy?


    One of the many reasons why I have a ham radio license and
    emergency-capable radios. Since California has a third-world power grid
    that is essential. Cell towers have back-up times between zero and a few
    hours, after which ... nada. BT, several times. Within less than 1/2h I
    had zero bars on the cell phone. During a larger wildfire even that
    little backup won't help because the tower itself can't get a connection
    to the network.

    Yet, things such as strokes and heart attacks don't stop happening just
    because there is an outage and then I hope neighbors will remember the
    property with those weird antennas and come here for help.


    Are there still cordless flip phones that tie into the regular
    landline or DECT? Many older and disabled people need that. Regular
    cordless phones are bulky and have exposed knobs. Not practical to
    carry in a pocket. It can be bone simple, even sans display or maybe
    single-line. Heck, even half a dozen programmed phone numbers and no
    keypad suffices. In the past they existed:

    I have cellular flip phone so I can bury it in my
    pocket, but they are rare. Doro makes such phones for
    the elderly at reasonable prices.


    That, and you never know whether it will work on your provider's network
    until you have bought and unboxed the phone.

    Connecting to the landline via DECT or something like that would be much better. Then the fire department would also immediately have the address
    which is important if someone has had an accident and is barely
    conscious or has dementia and thinks he still in Upper Sandusky where he
    was raised.


    https://jerhetrick.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/19398b-1170x780.jpg
    https://www.uniden.info/download/ompdf/ELBT595om.pdf

    Excellent idea, but then all that went away. There are some
    single-button lanyard systems but usually way overpriced. Most come
    with mandatory and expensive subscription.

    Years ago my mother had a phone from amazon that
    had a pendant emergency button. When pressed
    it dials up to three different numbers until
    someone answers. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Amplicom-PowerTel-Alarm-Corded-Telephone/dp/B001EZC4SG


    "Currently unavailable" of course, but it might
    be worth looking at that manufacturer's current
    products


    Yes, and many cell providers now only offer smart phones. So you have to
    buy one externally ... if you can even find one ... and hope it will be compatible with heir network because they can't really tell until they
    are told the IMEI number of the phone. Which you won't get before
    opening the package, and then it's usually non-returnable.

    --
    Regards, Joerg

    http://www.analogconsultants.com/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Doe@21:1/5 to Rich S on Tue Mar 15 18:24:51 2022
    Rich S <richsulinengineer@gmail.com> wrote:

    touchscreens can get flaky if the surface is gunked up

    I made all sorts of (unsophisticated) touch switches for chess clocks. The accuracy of smartphone touch screens is impressive. I always enable Developer Options "Show touch" (or whatever) to see what it senses.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeroen Belleman@21:1/5 to Rich S on Tue Mar 15 20:32:01 2022
    On 2022-03-15 18:34, Rich S wrote:

    Lol, I've had my smart phone sense a touch when I didn't even touch
    the screen. In the car the screen is not so sensitive, but it is
    terrible about thinking a touch was a swipe because the car moved
    as I touched the screen. A touch screen is a terrible idea in a
    moving car. You would think some of the effort in the millions of
    lines of code would be for voice control for most of the features
    in the car, but it only responds to "dial" and "navigate" and
    "play" sorts of commands. Even my bleeding phone will tell me what
    10,000 divided by 365 is. The answer is 42. Seems like the answer
    is always 42, no matter the question. Hmmm... maybe I have the
    wrong phone.

    --

    touchscreens can get flaky if the surface is gunked up so routine
    cleaning might help ;-) [...]

    In a car, the only user interface should be buttons and levers
    that your fingers can find and recognize by touch. All else is
    BAD!

    Jeroen Belleman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg@21:1/5 to Don Y on Tue Mar 15 15:49:43 2022
    On 3/15/22 3:35 PM, Don Y wrote:
    On 3/15/2022 12:32 PM, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
    On 2022-03-15 18:34, Rich S wrote:

    Lol, I've had my smart phone sense a touch when I didn't even touch
    the screen. In the car the screen is not so sensitive, but it is
    terrible about thinking a touch was a swipe because the car moved
    as I touched the screen. A touch screen is a terrible idea in a
    moving car. You would think some of the effort in the millions of
    lines of code would be for voice control for most of the features
    in the car, but it only responds to "dial" and "navigate" and
    "play" sorts of commands. Even my bleeding phone will tell me what
    10,000 divided by 365 is. The answer is 42. Seems like the answer
    is always 42, no matter the question. Hmmm... maybe I have the
    wrong phone.

    --

    touchscreens can get flaky if the surface is gunked up so routine
    cleaning might help ;-)  [...]

    In a car, the only user interface should be buttons and levers
    that your fingers can find and recognize by touch. All else is
    BAD!

    +42


    +43

    OTOH, cars have an ever increasing number of controls.  I suspect
    we're at the point of cognitive overload to be able to "blindly"
    recall where a specific control is located.


    I purposely bought one that doesn't. My current car doesn't even have
    power locks or power windows. Didn't want them. What ain't there can't
    break.

    Best was my old Citroen 2CV. In stock condition it did not contain one
    lone semiconductor. Not even a diode. This was my car back in the 80's:

    https://www.analogconsultants.com/ng/images/2CV.jpg

    16 horses. VROOOM :-)

    --
    Regards, Joerg

    http://www.analogconsultants.com/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Y@21:1/5 to Jeroen Belleman on Tue Mar 15 15:35:01 2022
    On 3/15/2022 12:32 PM, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
    On 2022-03-15 18:34, Rich S wrote:

    Lol, I've had my smart phone sense a touch when I didn't even touch
    the screen. In the car the screen is not so sensitive, but it is
    terrible about thinking a touch was a swipe because the car moved
    as I touched the screen. A touch screen is a terrible idea in a
    moving car. You would think some of the effort in the millions of
    lines of code would be for voice control for most of the features
    in the car, but it only responds to "dial" and "navigate" and
    "play" sorts of commands. Even my bleeding phone will tell me what
    10,000 divided by 365 is. The answer is 42. Seems like the answer
    is always 42, no matter the question. Hmmm... maybe I have the
    wrong phone.

    --

    touchscreens can get flaky if the surface is gunked up so routine
    cleaning might help ;-) [...]

    In a car, the only user interface should be buttons and levers
    that your fingers can find and recognize by touch. All else is
    BAD!

    +42

    OTOH, cars have an ever increasing number of controls. I suspect
    we're at the point of cognitive overload to be able to "blindly"
    recall where a specific control is located.

    Touchscreens, touchpads, big knobs, etc. -- all pull attention
    off the roadway.

    *And*, have prompt feedback as to "which control we ACTUALLY just
    activated"!

    Even speech interfaces are flakey enough to be a distraction
    ("now, what did it THINK I said??")

    I've seen consumer HUDs and they show some promise for feedback.
    But, you're still faced with the issue of telling the car what you want.
    And, the (lengthy) lag before it can provide feedback on what it
    has decided your intentions to be (you being distracted awaiting
    that feedback for that interval)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Gardner@21:1/5 to Joerg on Wed Mar 16 00:08:14 2022
    On 15/03/22 22:49, Joerg wrote:
    On 3/15/22 3:35 PM, Don Y wrote:
    On 3/15/2022 12:32 PM, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
    On 2022-03-15 18:34, Rich S wrote:

    Lol, I've had my smart phone sense a touch when I didn't even touch
    the screen. In the car the screen is not so sensitive, but it is
    terrible about thinking a touch was a swipe because the car moved
    as I touched the screen. A touch screen is a terrible idea in a
    moving car. You would think some of the effort in the millions of
    lines of code would be for voice control for most of the features
    in the car, but it only responds to "dial" and "navigate" and
    "play" sorts of commands. Even my bleeding phone will tell me what
    10,000 divided by 365 is. The answer is 42. Seems like the answer
    is always 42, no matter the question. Hmmm... maybe I have the
    wrong phone.

    --

    touchscreens can get flaky if the surface is gunked up so routine
    cleaning might help ;-)  [...]

    In a car, the only user interface should be buttons and levers
    that your fingers can find and recognize by touch. All else is
    BAD!

    As I've mentioned before, the Tesla salesman couldn't use
    the touchscreen to turn on window demisting. He tried
    voice activation, and managed to turn on under-seat heating.

    Now try doing that when in rush hour traffic by a school,
    or when some idiot cuts you up, or there is a big tarmac
    patch interpreted as a hole in road.



    +42


    +43

    OTOH, cars have an ever increasing number of controls.  I suspect
    we're at the point of cognitive overload to be able to "blindly"
    recall where a specific control is located.


    I purposely bought one that doesn't. My current car doesn't even have power locks or power windows. Didn't want them. What ain't there can't break.

    Best was my old Citroen 2CV. In stock condition it did not contain one lone semiconductor. Not even a diode. This was my car back in the 80's:

    In the UK that was delightfully advertised as, with
    one exception, not having anything, e.g.
    water-cooled engine: no
    The exception was
    central locking: yes (you can reach all doors from
    the driver's seat)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Y@21:1/5 to Tom Gardner on Tue Mar 15 18:40:08 2022
    On 3/15/2022 5:08 PM, Tom Gardner wrote:
    In a car, the only user interface should be buttons and levers
    that your fingers can find and recognize by touch. All else is
    BAD!

    As I've mentioned before, the Tesla salesman couldn't use
    the touchscreen to turn on window demisting. He tried
    voice activation, and managed to turn on under-seat heating.

    Now try doing that when in rush hour traffic by a school,
    or when some idiot cuts you up, or there is a big tarmac
    patch interpreted as a hole in road.

    There's nothing wrong with adding control *of* additional
    systems/features. The problem is how you expose that control
    to the user.

    It seldom rains, here. But, when it does, it comes down in
    buckets!

    Because it is such an infrequent event, we have to relearn *how*
    to engage the wipers each season. The wiper control is on a
    column mounted "stick" (like the turn signals). But, there
    are settings for low, high and intermittent (which requires use
    of another control to determine the delay between wipes) -- as
    well as "mist".

    And, of course, engaging the "washer".

    Plus similar settings for the *rear* wiper.

    So, the first rain of the season finds the driver "experimenting"
    to get the wipers to behave as he'd like. Thankfully, there
    is immediate feedback for these controls. And, there fixed
    location on the column stick means the driver can keep MOST of
    his attention on the road.

    Of course, automatic wipers eliminates *some* of this. But, every
    "automatic" feature makes manual control harder -- because you
    have less familiarity with those "overrides".

    The HVAC controls are usually in the "auto" and "synchronized"
    states. So, all you have to do is tweek the temperature (using
    a knob in a fixed location) and glance at the current setpoint.
    But, if you want to disengage the auto/sync features, your attention
    is diverted as you poke around waiting to see when the indicators
    extinguish.

    Want to route airflow differently? Button in a fixed location
    BUT you have to observe icons on the center screen to determine
    the "current" configuration.

    You can turn *off* the seat heaters (when they get accidentally
    engaged -- due to their piss poor location). But, can't tell
    if they are on/off without looking off to the side at the
    center console to examine the indicators, there. (too much
    lag for you to notice the *effect* of disabling them)

    And, it's nice that the infotainment presets track the current
    driver's preferences. But, the actual *settings* don't! So,
    you're stuck listening to whatever the previous driver had selected.
    And, at whatever volume, tonal content, etc. (how does this make sense?)

    (side) Mirror and DRIVER seat positions are restored. But, not the
    rear view mirror or preferences for which side mirrors tilt downward automatically, etc.

    I.e., principle of least surprise: restore the car to the settings in
    effect when THIS driver last occupied the driver's seat! (I would
    go so far as to include the *passenger* seat position!)

    You'd think folks with the resources of auto manufacturers would
    put more thought into these decisions...

    [Who could possibly think NOT recognizing UI "events" for 15+ seconds
    would be tolerable? Turn on ignition (don't start car because you'd
    be wasting fuel!). Wait 15 seconds for the smarts to come on line.
    Diddle with controls. *Then* start the car -- and your trip...
    And lets not get started on how brain-damaged the GPSs are!]

    <rolls eyes>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike Monett@21:1/5 to Joerg on Wed Mar 16 02:00:14 2022
    Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> wrote:

    On 3/15/22 3:35 PM, Don Y wrote:
    On 3/15/2022 12:32 PM, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
    On 2022-03-15 18:34, Rich S wrote:

    Lol, I've had my smart phone sense a touch when I didn't even touch
    the screen. In the car the screen is not so sensitive, but it is
    terrible about thinking a touch was a swipe because the car moved
    as I touched the screen. A touch screen is a terrible idea in a
    moving car. You would think some of the effort in the millions of
    lines of code would be for voice control for most of the features
    in the car, but it only responds to "dial" and "navigate" and
    "play" sorts of commands. Even my bleeding phone will tell me what
    10,000 divided by 365 is. The answer is 42. Seems like the answer
    is always 42, no matter the question. Hmmm... maybe I have the
    wrong phone.

    --

    touchscreens can get flaky if the surface is gunked up so routine
    cleaning might help ;-)  [...]

    In a car, the only user interface should be buttons and levers
    that your fingers can find and recognize by touch. All else is
    BAD!

    +42


    +43

    OTOH, cars have an ever increasing number of controls.  I suspect
    we're at the point of cognitive overload to be able to "blindly"
    recall where a specific control is located.


    I purposely bought one that doesn't. My current car doesn't even have
    power locks or power windows. Didn't want them. What ain't there can't
    break.

    Best was my old Citroen 2CV. In stock condition it did not contain one
    lone semiconductor. Not even a diode. This was my car back in the 80's:

    https://www.analogconsultants.com/ng/images/2CV.jpg

    16 horses. VROOOM :-)

    Firefox refused to load due to certificate problem.



    --
    MRM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tauno Voipio@21:1/5 to Mike Monett on Wed Mar 16 13:24:04 2022
    On 16.3.22 4.00, Mike Monett wrote:
    Joerg <news@analogconsultants.com> wrote:

    On 3/15/22 3:35 PM, Don Y wrote:
    On 3/15/2022 12:32 PM, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
    On 2022-03-15 18:34, Rich S wrote:

    Lol, I've had my smart phone sense a touch when I didn't even touch >>>>>> the screen. In the car the screen is not so sensitive, but it is
    terrible about thinking a touch was a swipe because the car moved
    as I touched the screen. A touch screen is a terrible idea in a
    moving car. You would think some of the effort in the millions of
    lines of code would be for voice control for most of the features
    in the car, but it only responds to "dial" and "navigate" and
    "play" sorts of commands. Even my bleeding phone will tell me what >>>>>> 10,000 divided by 365 is. The answer is 42. Seems like the answer
    is always 42, no matter the question. Hmmm... maybe I have the
    wrong phone.

    --

    touchscreens can get flaky if the surface is gunked up so routine
    cleaning might help ;-)  [...]

    In a car, the only user interface should be buttons and levers
    that your fingers can find and recognize by touch. All else is
    BAD!

    +42


    +43

    OTOH, cars have an ever increasing number of controls.  I suspect
    we're at the point of cognitive overload to be able to "blindly"
    recall where a specific control is located.


    I purposely bought one that doesn't. My current car doesn't even have
    power locks or power windows. Didn't want them. What ain't there can't
    break.

    Best was my old Citroen 2CV. In stock condition it did not contain one
    lone semiconductor. Not even a diode. This was my car back in the 80's:

    https://www.analogconsultants.com/ng/images/2CV.jpg

    16 horses. VROOOM :-)

    Firefox refused to load due to certificate problem.


    Mike, just click 'Advanced' and to the next page 'Accept'.

    Nice basic French. We called them 'overall for four men'.

    --

    -TV

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adrian Caspersz@21:1/5 to Tom Gardner on Wed Mar 16 12:36:28 2022
    On 13/03/2022 08:40, Tom Gardner wrote:
    On 13/03/22 05:27, Joerg wrote:

    I have cellular flip phone so I can bury it in my
    pocket, but they are rare. Doro makes such phones for
    the elderly at reasonable prices.

    They still need some work, some folks are barely in the 20th century and
    not out of it.

    A friend purchased a Doro phone she couldn't use, as could not fathom
    out that the green button is pressed after typing the number, to make
    the call. And the red button to end it.

    Her usual phone use is to pick up a receiver and dial ...

    I note the Uniden phone linked has those buttons labelled "talk" and
    "end". Much better, but scrap the memories and display. Use a voice
    assistant prompt.

    --
    Adrian C

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Gardner@21:1/5 to Adrian Caspersz on Wed Mar 16 12:44:33 2022
    On 16/03/22 12:36, Adrian Caspersz wrote:
    On 13/03/2022 08:40, Tom Gardner wrote:

    I have cellular flip phone so I can bury it in my
    pocket, but they are rare. Doro makes such phones for
    the elderly at reasonable prices.

    They still need some work, some folks are barely in the 20th century and not out
    of it.

    A friend purchased a Doro phone she couldn't use, as could not fathom out that
    the green button is pressed after typing the number, to make the call. And the
    red button to end it.

    You can also press the green button before dialling.

    You can set them to answer when the phone is opened, but
    obviously then you can't check to see whether you want
    to answer.

    An advantage for the deaf is that they have a decently
    loud speaker.

    Her usual phone use is to pick up a receiver and dial ...

    I note the Uniden phone linked has those buttons labelled "talk" and "end". Much
    better, but scrap the memories and display. Use a voice assistant prompt.

    I would expect that level of sophistication would come
    with other confusing sophistication. KISS :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adrian Caspersz@21:1/5 to Tom Gardner on Wed Mar 16 14:47:18 2022
    On 16/03/2022 12:44, Tom Gardner wrote:
    On 16/03/22 12:36, Adrian Caspersz wrote:
    On 13/03/2022 08:40, Tom Gardner wrote:

    I have cellular flip phone so I can bury it in my
    pocket, but they are rare. Doro makes such phones for
    the elderly at reasonable prices.

    They still need some work, some folks are barely in the 20th century
    and not out of it.

    A friend purchased a Doro phone she couldn't use, as could not fathom
    out that the green button is pressed after typing the number, to make
    the call. And the red button to end it.

    You can also press the green button before dialling.

    The way mobile phone dialling works, that means that the phone actually connects the number after a short wait when it thinks the user has
    finished pressing buttons. Hopefully it's right :)


    You can set them to answer when the phone is opened, but
    obviously then you can't check to see whether you want
    to answer.

    An advantage for the deaf is that they have a decently
    loud speaker.


    Ah, is it a real loud speaker or is it the hands-free speaker misused?

    The problem with the latter, is although the phone user can place the outrageously loud speaker to their ear to hear, it's the poor recipient
    at the other end that has to cope with the clipped distortion from a
    microphone amplifier previously adjusted for hands-free use.


    I note the Uniden phone linked has those buttons labelled "talk" and
    "end". Much better, but scrap the memories and display. Use a voice
    assistant prompt.

    I would expect that level of sophistication would come
    with other confusing sophistication. KISS :)

    Tech needs to go to this level, look what's on the top of the radio and
    hidden in the back.

    Dementia / Alzheimer’s DAB+ & FM RADIO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZCw9bUJ6q8

    (Stupid idea to include an MP3 player)

    --
    Adrian C

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg@21:1/5 to Adrian Caspersz on Wed Mar 16 10:03:45 2022
    On 3/16/22 7:47 AM, Adrian Caspersz wrote:
    On 16/03/2022 12:44, Tom Gardner wrote:
    On 16/03/22 12:36, Adrian Caspersz wrote:
    On 13/03/2022 08:40, Tom Gardner wrote:

    I have cellular flip phone so I can bury it in my
    pocket, but they are rare. Doro makes such phones for
    the elderly at reasonable prices.

    They still need some work, some folks are barely in the 20th century
    and not out of it.

    A friend purchased a Doro phone she couldn't use, as could not fathom
    out that the green button is pressed after typing the number, to make
    the call. And the red button to end it.

    You can also press the green button before dialling.

    The way mobile phone dialling works, that means that the phone actually connects the number after a short wait when it thinks the user has
    finished pressing buttons. Hopefully it's right :)


    Exactly! Even my Android smart phone can do that, so why not the
    "modern" flip phones?

    It isn't really rocket science to emulate a POTS phone. Or maybe to some telephone design engineers it is ...


    You can set them to answer when the phone is opened, but
    obviously then you can't check to see whether you want
    to answer.

    An advantage for the deaf is that they have a decently
    loud speaker.


    Ah, is it a real loud speaker or is it the hands-free speaker misused?

    The problem with the latter, is although the phone user can place the outrageously loud speaker to their ear to hear, it's the poor recipient
    at the other end that has to cope with the clipped distortion from a microphone amplifier previously adjusted for hands-free use.


    It's a matter of how good the design engineers are. On my Samsung smart
    phone this works. I can use it in hands-free mode and hold it to my ear.
    Of course I will not do that for long because it's so loud that
    eventually inner ear damage can result. I've done it a few times, very
    briefly, in situations where there was extreme noise around me and I had
    to answer a call to tell them I'll call right back when away from the
    noise source.


    I note the Uniden phone linked has those buttons labelled "talk" and
    "end". Much better, but scrap the memories and display. Use a voice
    assistant prompt.

    I would expect that level of sophistication would come
    with other confusing sophistication. KISS :)

    Tech needs to go to this level, look what's on the top of the radio and hidden in the back.

    Dementia / Alzheimer’s DAB+ & FM RADIO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gZCw9bUJ6q8

    (Stupid idea to include an MP3 player)


    Main thing is you have to try stuff out in the field extensively and
    with real customers. In med-tech we did this all the time but
    unfortunately that doesn't happen in other fields.

    --
    Regards, Joerg

    http://www.analogconsultants.com/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Phil Hobbs@21:1/5 to Joerg on Wed Mar 16 15:31:34 2022
    Joerg wrote:
    On 3/16/22 7:47 AM, Adrian Caspersz wrote:
    On 16/03/2022 12:44, Tom Gardner wrote:
    On 16/03/22 12:36, Adrian Caspersz wrote:
    On 13/03/2022 08:40, Tom Gardner wrote:

    I have cellular flip phone so I can bury it in my
    pocket, but they are rare. Doro makes such phones for
    the elderly at reasonable prices.

    They still need some work, some folks are barely in the 20th century
    and not out of it.

    A friend purchased a Doro phone she couldn't use, as could not
    fathom out that the green button is pressed after typing the number,
    to make the call. And the red button to end it.

    You can also press the green button before dialling.

    The way mobile phone dialling works, that means that the phone
    actually connects the number after a short wait when it thinks the
    user has finished pressing buttons. Hopefully it's right :)


    Exactly! Even my Android smart phone can do that, so why not the
    "modern" flip phones?

    It isn't really rocket science to emulate a POTS phone. Or maybe to some telephone design engineers it is ...


    I'm still waiting for full duplex voice. :(

    We all grew up having crystal-clear FDX phones--how did they ever get us
    to settle for these stupid walkie-talkie things?

    Just one chatterbox on a cell phone wreaks havoc on a phone meeting.

    Cheers

    Phil Hobbs

    --
    Dr Philip C D Hobbs
    Principal Consultant
    ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
    Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
    Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

    http://electrooptical.net
    http://hobbs-eo.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg@21:1/5 to Phil Hobbs on Wed Mar 16 13:32:48 2022
    On 3/16/22 12:31 PM, Phil Hobbs wrote:
    Joerg wrote:
    On 3/16/22 7:47 AM, Adrian Caspersz wrote:
    On 16/03/2022 12:44, Tom Gardner wrote:
    On 16/03/22 12:36, Adrian Caspersz wrote:
    On 13/03/2022 08:40, Tom Gardner wrote:

    I have cellular flip phone so I can bury it in my
    pocket, but they are rare. Doro makes such phones for
    the elderly at reasonable prices.

    They still need some work, some folks are barely in the 20th
    century and not out of it.

    A friend purchased a Doro phone she couldn't use, as could not
    fathom out that the green button is pressed after typing the
    number, to make the call. And the red button to end it.

    You can also press the green button before dialling.

    The way mobile phone dialling works, that means that the phone
    actually connects the number after a short wait when it thinks the
    user has finished pressing buttons. Hopefully it's right :)


    Exactly! Even my Android smart phone can do that, so why not the
    "modern" flip phones?

    It isn't really rocket science to emulate a POTS phone. Or maybe to
    some telephone design engineers it is ...


    I'm still waiting for full duplex voice. :(

    We all grew up having crystal-clear FDX phones--how did they ever get us
    to settle for these stupid walkie-talkie things?

    Just one chatterbox on a cell phone wreaks havoc on a phone meeting.


    Just use morse code via ham radio in full-QSK mode (full break-in).
    Everybody can chime in at any time, in milliseconds.

    :-)

    I am not at that performance level yet because the experts go at a high
    speed but I've heard groups where it almost sounded like the inside of a beehive.

    One of the worst developments in phones was when companies switched to
    internal VoIP over their usual LAN. I've had many cases where a guy had
    to whip out his cell phone and call again because his office phone
    became unintelligible. Or it was "Let me call you back from the stock
    room, they've still got a real phone-phone".

    --
    Regards, Joerg

    http://www.analogconsultants.com/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Y@21:1/5 to Adrian Caspersz on Wed Mar 16 13:50:35 2022
    On 3/16/2022 7:47 AM, Adrian Caspersz wrote:

    You can also press the green button before dialling.

    The way mobile phone dialling works, that means that the phone actually connects the number after a short wait when it thinks the user has finished pressing buttons. Hopefully it's right :)

    A dialer should be smart enough to understand the notion of a "dialing plan". E.g., if the user types "911" (USA), that's the *entire* number; dial it NOW. Likewise, 555-1212. Or, (617) 234-5678. Or, 1 (703) 876-5432. (I.e. the dialer can recognize area codes, leading '1', special numbers, etc. instead
    of blindly "counting digits".)

    Naive dialers implement a (no digit detected) timeout and force the user to wait for that to elapse before dialing the number.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rick C@21:1/5 to Jeroen Belleman on Wed Mar 16 19:28:50 2022
    On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 3:32:13 PM UTC-4, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
    On 2022-03-15 18:34, Rich S wrote:

    Lol, I've had my smart phone sense a touch when I didn't even touch
    the screen. In the car the screen is not so sensitive, but it is
    terrible about thinking a touch was a swipe because the car moved
    as I touched the screen. A touch screen is a terrible idea in a
    moving car. You would think some of the effort in the millions of
    lines of code would be for voice control for most of the features
    in the car, but it only responds to "dial" and "navigate" and
    "play" sorts of commands. Even my bleeding phone will tell me what
    10,000 divided by 365 is. The answer is 42. Seems like the answer
    is always 42, no matter the question. Hmmm... maybe I have the
    wrong phone.

    --

    touchscreens can get flaky if the surface is gunked up so routine
    cleaning might help ;-) [...]

    In a car, the only user interface should be buttons and levers
    that your fingers can find and recognize by touch. All else is
    BAD!

    That is absolutely true. I could find any control on the dash by feel in my 1997 T100. Never had to take my eyes off the road. My Tesla X causes me to stop looking at the road for many seconds if I want to do pretty much anything that isn't on the
    stalks. A touch to the panel can easily be interpreted wrong because of the car moving while my arm is extended.

    While having the touch panel is essential to control all the features, it should not be the only means of controlling things like wipers. The V.11 update has taken more things off the screen as one touch controls and required bringing up other screens
    to access them, like HVAC accessories, etc. This latest update has been a HUGE step backwards. Lots of owners are complaining about it.

    --

    Rick C.

    -- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
    -- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rick C@21:1/5 to Joerg on Wed Mar 16 19:23:11 2022
    On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:49:52 PM UTC-4, Joerg wrote:
    On 3/15/22 3:35 PM, Don Y wrote:
    On 3/15/2022 12:32 PM, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
    On 2022-03-15 18:34, Rich S wrote:

    Lol, I've had my smart phone sense a touch when I didn't even touch
    the screen. In the car the screen is not so sensitive, but it is
    terrible about thinking a touch was a swipe because the car moved
    as I touched the screen. A touch screen is a terrible idea in a
    moving car. You would think some of the effort in the millions of
    lines of code would be for voice control for most of the features
    in the car, but it only responds to "dial" and "navigate" and
    "play" sorts of commands. Even my bleeding phone will tell me what
    10,000 divided by 365 is. The answer is 42. Seems like the answer
    is always 42, no matter the question. Hmmm... maybe I have the
    wrong phone.

    --

    touchscreens can get flaky if the surface is gunked up so routine
    cleaning might help ;-) [...]

    In a car, the only user interface should be buttons and levers
    that your fingers can find and recognize by touch. All else is
    BAD!

    +42

    +43
    OTOH, cars have an ever increasing number of controls. I suspect
    we're at the point of cognitive overload to be able to "blindly"
    recall where a specific control is located.

    I purposely bought one that doesn't. My current car doesn't even have
    power locks or power windows. Didn't want them. What ain't there can't
    break.

    Why do you have a car then?

    --

    Rick C.

    + Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
    + Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rick C@21:1/5 to Adrian Caspersz on Wed Mar 16 19:36:38 2022
    On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 8:36:36 AM UTC-4, Adrian Caspersz wrote:
    On 13/03/2022 08:40, Tom Gardner wrote:
    On 13/03/22 05:27, Joerg wrote:

    I have cellular flip phone so I can bury it in my
    pocket, but they are rare. Doro makes such phones for
    the elderly at reasonable prices.
    They still need some work, some folks are barely in the 20th century and
    not out of it.

    A friend purchased a Doro phone she couldn't use, as could not fathom
    out that the green button is pressed after typing the number, to make
    the call. And the red button to end it.

    Her usual phone use is to pick up a receiver and dial ...

    I note the Uniden phone linked has those buttons labelled "talk" and
    "end". Much better, but scrap the memories and display. Use a voice
    assistant prompt.

    That's odd. Here flip phones have a green button to start or end the call and a red button to turn power on/off.

    --

    Rick C.

    +- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
    +- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rick C@21:1/5 to Tom Gardner on Wed Mar 16 19:33:57 2022
    On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 8:08:21 PM UTC-4, Tom Gardner wrote:
    On 15/03/22 22:49, Joerg wrote:
    On 3/15/22 3:35 PM, Don Y wrote:
    On 3/15/2022 12:32 PM, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
    On 2022-03-15 18:34, Rich S wrote:

    Lol, I've had my smart phone sense a touch when I didn't even touch >>>>> the screen. In the car the screen is not so sensitive, but it is
    terrible about thinking a touch was a swipe because the car moved >>>>> as I touched the screen. A touch screen is a terrible idea in a
    moving car. You would think some of the effort in the millions of >>>>> lines of code would be for voice control for most of the features >>>>> in the car, but it only responds to "dial" and "navigate" and
    "play" sorts of commands. Even my bleeding phone will tell me what >>>>> 10,000 divided by 365 is. The answer is 42. Seems like the answer >>>>> is always 42, no matter the question. Hmmm... maybe I have the
    wrong phone.

    --

    touchscreens can get flaky if the surface is gunked up so routine
    cleaning might help ;-) [...]

    In a car, the only user interface should be buttons and levers
    that your fingers can find and recognize by touch. All else is
    BAD!
    As I've mentioned before, the Tesla salesman couldn't use
    the touchscreen to turn on window demisting. He tried
    voice activation, and managed to turn on under-seat heating.

    Now try doing that when in rush hour traffic by a school,
    or when some idiot cuts you up, or there is a big tarmac
    patch interpreted as a hole in road.

    The one saving grace in the Tesla is that the car is driving, not me, while I try to find a control. But eventually those distractions will catch me off guard and BOOM! But the car does a fairly good job. In fact, when I'm coming up on traffic at a
    light, I will put the autopilot ON just so it will stop the car and I don't have to bother.

    --

    Rick C.

    -+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
    -+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Joerg@21:1/5 to Rick C on Thu Mar 17 09:40:23 2022
    On 3/16/22 7:23 PM, Rick C wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 6:49:52 PM UTC-4, Joerg wrote:
    On 3/15/22 3:35 PM, Don Y wrote:
    On 3/15/2022 12:32 PM, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
    On 2022-03-15 18:34, Rich S wrote:

    Lol, I've had my smart phone sense a touch when I didn't even touch >>>>>> the screen. In the car the screen is not so sensitive, but it is
    terrible about thinking a touch was a swipe because the car moved
    as I touched the screen. A touch screen is a terrible idea in a
    moving car. You would think some of the effort in the millions of
    lines of code would be for voice control for most of the features
    in the car, but it only responds to "dial" and "navigate" and
    "play" sorts of commands. Even my bleeding phone will tell me what >>>>>> 10,000 divided by 365 is. The answer is 42. Seems like the answer
    is always 42, no matter the question. Hmmm... maybe I have the
    wrong phone.

    --

    touchscreens can get flaky if the surface is gunked up so routine
    cleaning might help ;-) [...]

    In a car, the only user interface should be buttons and levers
    that your fingers can find and recognize by touch. All else is
    BAD!

    +42

    +43
    OTOH, cars have an ever increasing number of controls. I suspect
    we're at the point of cognitive overload to be able to "blindly"
    recall where a specific control is located.

    I purposely bought one that doesn't. My current car doesn't even have
    power locks or power windows. Didn't want them. What ain't there can't
    break.

    Why do you have a car then?


    Simple. Because I need one for the odd jobs that require schlepping lots
    of stuff. Food from Costco, fuel pellets, firewood. Kind of tough to do
    via bicycle. These jobs do not require power lock or windows. In fact,
    none does.

    I drive less than 1500mi/year in cars and ride about 4000mi/year on
    bicycles. The non-assisted and purely muscle-powered kind. To me, talk
    about the environment is cheap, it's personal action that counts.

    --
    Regards, Joerg

    http://www.analogconsultants.com/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)